Real-Life Management of Children and Adolescents with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: The Italian Experience.

BACKGROUND: To date, no data on the adherence to specific guidelines for children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) have been reported. METHODS: Since 2001, guidelines for treatment with imatinib mesylate (IM) and monitoring in patients younger than 18 years with CP-CML have been shared with 9 pediatric referral centers (P centers) and 4 reference centers for adults and children/adolescents (AP centers) in Italy. In this study, the adherence to these guidelines was analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with a median age of 11.4 years and 23 patients with a median age of 11.0 years were managed at 9 P and at 4 AP centers, respectively. Evaluations of bone marrow (BM) and/or peripheral blood (PB) were available for more than 90% of evaluable patients. Cytogenetics and molecular monitoring of PB were more consistently performed in AP centers, whereas molecular analysis of BM was carried out more frequently in P centers. Before 2009, some patients who responded to IM underwent a transplantation, contrary to the guidelines' recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that having specific guidelines is an important tool for an optimal management of childhood CP-CML, together with exchange of knowledge and proactive discussions within the network.

Management of Advanced-Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia represents the poster child of successful precision medicine in cancer, with amazing survival results achieved with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in many patients with chronic-phase disease. Unfortunately, however, this good news has not extended to patients in blast crisis, for whom survival has not clearly been improved with TKIs. During his presentation at the NCCN 21st Annual Conference, Jerald P. Radich, MD, briefly explored the biology behind advanced-stage disease and several of the molecular findings in disease progression. He also reviewed some of the therapeutic options in advanced disease, emphasizing that transplantation, although fraught with some difficulties, offers the best long-term prognosis for patients in blast crisis.

Can chronic myeloid leukaemia in children and adolescents be successfully treated without haematopoietic stem cell transplant? A single centre experience.

We analysed the long-term outcome of 35 children and adolescents (<20 years at diagnosis) with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in chronic phase: 20 patients had received interferon-alpha and/or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 15 underwent a haematopoietic stem cell transplant. The 10-year survival probabilities were similar in transplanted and non-transplanted patients (73·3% vs. 72·1%, respectively), whereas the survival probability was significantly lower in patients diagnosed before 1999 compared to those diagnosed afterwards (62·1% vs. 100%, P = 0·0384). The availability of TKIs and the standardized molecular monitoring have significantly improved treatment, management and outcome in children and adolescents with CML.

Is there a best TKI for chronic phase CML?

The development of BCR/ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) over the past 20 years has dramatically improved the outcomes for patients with every stage of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Clinicians now have access to 5 oral, generally well-tolerated, and highly effective TKIs. How should these agents be used for an individual patient to ensure the best possible duration and quality-of-life, to avoid treatment-related complications, and potentially to achieve a cure at an affordable cost? Because CML patients may need to continue TKI therapy indefinitely, the long-term safety of each treatment option must be considered. Evidence-based care requires an understanding of the optimal use of these drugs, their specific early and late toxicities, the prognostic significance of achieving treatment milestones, and the critical importance of molecular monitoring. Efficacy is important, but treatment choice does not depend only on efficacy. Choosing among various treatment options is informed by understanding the distinct benefits and risks of each agent, along with careful consideration of patient-specific factors, such as risk status, age, and comorbidities.

Pretransplantation use of the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors has no negative impact on the HCT outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was a standard therapy in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). As a result of the effective therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), HCT was shifted to defined clinical situations. We present the results of observational prospective analysis of 28 CML patients undergoing HCT after exposure to, at least, two lines of TKI (including dasatinib and/or nilotinib), with respect to response, overall survival (OS), treatment toxicity, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and progression/relapse incidence. RESULTS: All the patients but one engrafted with median time 19 days. OS for patients in CP1 and CP2/accelerated phase (AcP) were 92.9 and 85.7 %, respectively. Six patients allotransplanted in blast crisis (BC) CML died early after HCT. Eighteen patients achieved deep molecular remission (MR(4.5) or MR(4.0)). Relapse incidence was 29.6 %. Median time to progression (TTP) differs significantly depending on the CML phase prior to HCT, the best response achieved after HCT and development of chronic GvHD. NRM yielded the values 7.1, 12.5, and 50 % in CP1, CP2/AcP, and BC, respectively. Fatal outcome, due to veno-occlusive disease (VOD), was observed in two (7 %) patients. In five (17.9 %) patients, mild or moderate VOD was observed with no negative impact of preceding therapy with TKI2. Acute GvHD was diagnosed in 25.9 % of patients, while chronic GvHD developed in 42.9 % of individuals. CONCLUSION: Pretransplantation therapy with TKI2 in CP CML is safe and reasonable. In BC, the optimal approach before HCT is to reduce the leukemic burden and achieve subsequent CP.

Management of advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

The management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in accelerated or blast phase (advanced phase) remains a significant challenge despite the introduction of very effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The biology of advanced-phase CML is complex and engages several pathways that are not optimally targeted by TKIs. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only potentially curative therapy, but the effectiveness of this conventional approach is limited. New strategies are required to improve the outlook for these patients.

Firstline treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients should be based on a holistic approach.

New selective and more potent drugs for the cure of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients are now available: physicians in some countries must decide the best option, selecting one of the drugs available. What the main prognostic factors are in order to make this selection remains a matter of discussion. Introducing a 'holistic approach' for the first time in chronic myeloid leukemia, as practiced in other diseases, and looking at the patient in a complete picture, considering several variables, such as comorbidities, age, concomitant drugs, lifestyle and patient expectations, may be of help to understand, patient by patient, the best therapeutic strategy.

First-line treatment of newly diagnosed elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: current and emerging strategies.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a disease of the hematopoietic stem cell characterized by a median age at diagnosis of 60-65 years according to most epidemiologic registries. Prior to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, older age was considered an adverse prognostic factor and was included in two of the most used scoring systems for CML, the Sokal score and the Euro score. Moreover, older age was generally considered a limitation for the use of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, given the higher toxicity observed. After the introduction of TKIs, age lost much of its prognostic impact in patients in chronic phase (CP), and the EUTOS score, developed in patients treated with imatinib, did not identify age as a risk variable. However, most CML patients require life-long treatment; therefore, as patients age while taking a TKI, the complexity of the management of elderly patients may increase over time. To date, imatinib, the first TKI introduced, and two second-generation TKIs, nilotinib and dasatinib, have been approved in most Western countries for the first-line treatment of CML. These drugs differ in terms of efficacy, safety, and costs; therefore, knowledge of their characteristics is extremely relevant for optimal management of elderly CML patients. We reviewed the impact of age on the first-line treatment of CP CML patients in the TKI era, considering the epidemiology of the disease, the role of comorbidities, and analyzing data from population-based studies and clinical trials.

Prognostic factors for outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The aim of this study was to estimate the prognostic factors for the outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in chronic phase (CP) in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Ninety-seven patients who underwent allogeneic SCT in CP were analyzed. Forty-seven were TKI-naïve at the time of transplant, and 50 received TKI(s) treatment before transplantation. After a median follow-up of 115.8 months, the 4-year overall survival and event-free survival were 80.4 and 58.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that there were no differences in survival outcomes based on prior TKI therapy. Older age was a prognostic factor for higher treatment-related mortality (TRM), and the type of graft source and younger age were associated with relapse, but prior TKI therapy and disease status at the time of transplant were not associated with either TRM or relapse. Additionally, a major molecular response at 1 month and an MR(4.5) at 3 months were important predictors of favorable long-term outcomes. This study demonstrates the prognostic factors for the outcomes of allogeneic SCT in CP CML and shows that survival outcomes were not affected by the administration of long-term multi-TKI treatment prior to transplantation.

Outcome of allotransplants in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia following imatinib failure: prognosis revisited.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of allotransplants in patients with chronic -phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who progressed to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) following imatinib failure, especially those without preceding suboptimal response, remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and five patients with newly-diagnosed CML-CP were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-six patients received first-line imatinib therapy, 26 received interferon followed by imatinib, and 13 received front-line allotransplants. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in overall survival (p=0.57) and blast-free survival (p=0.25) between different first-line therapies. Among 66 imatinib-treated patients, 18 (27.3%) developed imatinib failure, 14 (21.2%) progressed to AP/BP, including eight without preceding suboptimal response. Compared to front-line allotransplant, patients with imatinib failure had a significantly worse overall survival after allotransplants (p=0.015), mainly due to an increase of treatment-related mortality. CONCLUSION: Early recognition of imatinib-treated patients who should receive an allotransplant is important rather than waiting until imatinib failure with disease progression.

How I treat newly diagnosed chronic phase CML.

The progress made in the understanding of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) since the recognition of a common chromosomal abnormality to the introduction of ever more effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors is unprecedented in cancer. The expected survival for patients diagnosed with CML today, if properly managed, is probably similar to that of the general population. When managing patients with CML the goal is to achieve the best long-term outcome and we should base the treatment decisions on the data available. The results from cytogenetic and molecular analyses have to be interpreted judiciously and all available treatment options integrated into the treatment plan properly. The availability of several treatment options in CML is an asset, but the temptation of rapid succession of treatment changes because of perceived suboptimal response or for adverse events that could be managed needs to be avoided. Any decision to change therapy needs to weigh the expected long-term outcome with the current option versus the true expectations with any new option, particularly as it relates to irreversible outcomes, such as transformation to blast phase and death. In this manuscript, we discuss the treatment approach that has helped us manage successfully a large CML population.

Utility values for chronic myelogenous leukemia chronic phase health states from the general public in the United Kingdom.

This study estimated time trade-off preference values associated with the four chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) chronic phase-related health states (i.e. untreated, hematologic response, cytogenetic response and molecular response) among members of the general public in the UK (n = 241). All four health states were associated with decreases in preference values from full health. The molecular response to treatment was the most preferred health state (mean utility of 0.94). The second-most preferred health state was cytogenetic response followed by hematologic response (mean utilities were 0.89 and 0.80, respectively). The least preferred health state was untreated chronic phase CML (mean utility of 0.72). The utility values for each state were significantly different from one another (p < 0.001). This study demonstrated and quantified the impact that more robust treatment responses have on the health-related quality of life of patients with chronic phase CML.

Long-term follow-up of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase developing sudden blast phase on imatinib therapy.

Sudden blast phase (SBP) is a rare event that occurs in an unpredictable fashion amongst patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who otherwise appear to be responding satisfactorily to imatinib (IM) treatment. We investigated the incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment outcome and long-term follow-up of 213 patients with chronic phase CML treated with IM according to the European LeukemiaNet guidelines. Nine patients, eight of whom received IM as first-line therapy, developed SBP (4.2% of the total). They tended to have low or intermediate risk Sokal scores at diagnosis, a predominance of the lymphoid phenotype and a short interval from "optimal" response to the development of BP. Five of the nine patients with SBP are alive in complete molecular remission; however, all of them underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The cumulative incidence of SBP for the patients who received IM as first-line therapy was 5.9% and the 2-year overall survival of the nine patients who developed SBP was 56%. Despite the improved outcome for patients with SBP receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and transplant, many of these patients are not salvaged with these therapies. This illustrates the need to develop predictive models to identify patients early whose response to TKI therapy will not be durable and hopefully prevent the transformation to advanced disease.

The clinical significance of achieving different levels of cytogenetic response in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after failure to front-line therapy: is complete cytogenetic response the only desirable endpoint?

UNLABELLED: Many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have failed initial therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor achieve a cytogenetic response that is not complete (ie, partial or minor). This study analyzes the clinical benefit of such responses and identifies value in achieving such responses. Patients with less than complete cytogenetic response to second -line therapy or beyond should be considered to have benefit from therapy and the value of this considered in the context of which alternative options are available. BACKGROUND: Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) is the gold standard for response to therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) because it is associated with a survival benefit. However, patients who have failed initial therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) frequently achieve only partial or minor cytogenetic responses. The clinical benefit of such responses is unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of all 165 consecutive patients treated in clinical trials with TKI as second-line therapy or beyond after failure to prior imatinib therapy. RESULTS: A CCyR was achieved with second-line TKI therapy or beyond in 52% of patients, whereas 7% achieved a partial cytogenetic response (PCyR), 14% a minor cytogenetic response (mCyR), 14% complete hematologic response (CHR) only, and 17% no response. The 3-year survival probability was 98% for those with CCyR, compared to 83% with PCyR, 83% for mCyR, 76% for CHR, and 71% for no response. Survival free from transformation rates at 3 years were 93%, 73%, 84%, 88%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CCyR is associated with the greatest survival benefit among patients treated with second-line therapy or beyond and remains the optimal cytogenetic goal of therapy. However, patients with partial and minor cytogenetic response derive a benefit compared to patients who have no response. This benefit should be recognized and evaluated against any alternative option available to a given patient before a change in therapy is recommended.

Long-term outcomes of HLA-matched sibling compared with mismatched related and unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia: a single institution experience in China.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). In this study, the long-term outcomes of HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) with mismatched related donor (MRD) and unrelated donor (URD) transplantation for CML in the first chronic phase (CML-CP1) using different graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens according to donor source and the degree of HLA matching were compared. The data of 91 patients with CML-CP1 were analyzed with respect to GVHD, overall survival (OS), and transplant-related mortality (TRM). The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 25.5% in the MSD and 40.5% in the MRD/URD group (P = 0.133). The 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was not different between the MSD and the MRD/URD groups, while extensive chronic GVHD was different between the two groups (31.9% vs. 10.8%, P = 0.023). The 5-year cumulative relapse rate was not different between the MSD and the MRD/URD groups, while TRM was different between the two groups (6.6% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.010). The 5-year cumulative OS was 90.9%, 71.5%, and 85.4% in the MSD, the MRD/URD, and the HLA allele-matched URD transplantation, respectively (MSD vs. MRD/URD, P = 0.013; MSD vs. HLA allele-matched URD, P = 0.437). In conclusion, survival in HLA allele-matched URD is equivalent to MSD, but in MRD and mismatched URD is inferior to MSD in patients with CML-CP1 undergoing allo-HSCT using different GVHD prophylaxis regimens according to donor source and degree of HLA matching. Patients undergoing MRD/URD transplantation have an equal quality of life as patients undergoing MSD transplantation.

Comparative analysis of BU and CY versus CY and TBI in full intensity unrelated marrow donor transplantation for AML, CML and myelodysplasia.

We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes in 1593 T-replete unrelated donor (URD) marrow transplant recipients with AML, MDS and CML who received myeloablative conditioning regimens of either BU and CY (BuCy), standard-dose Cy/TBI (1000-1260 cGy) or high-dose Cy/TBI (1320-1500 cGy). Subjects were drawn from patients transplanted between 1991 and 1999 facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program. Patients who received high-dose Cy/TBI regimens were slightly younger, more likely to receive a mismatched transplant and to have intermediate or advanced disease compared with patients in the BuCy or standard-dose TBI group. Neutrophil recovery was significantly higher in the standard-dose CY/TBI group compared with the high-dose Cy/TBI or BuCy group. Patients who received the high-dose Cy/TBI regimen had an increased risk of developing grades III-IV aGVHD when compared with the control group who received BuCy (P = 0.011). OS, disease-free survival (DFS), TRM and relapse were not significantly different between any of the regimens. We conclude that BuCy, standard-dose and high-dose Cy/TBI regimens have equivalent efficacy profiles for OS, DFS, TRM and relapse risk in patients undergoing T-replete URD marrow transplantation for AML, CML and MDS.