Adrenocorticotropic Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Microadenoma Presenting with Acute Psychosis, Delirium and Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity.

Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary adenomas are known to be associated with behavioural changes but acute presentation including psychosis and delirium are less common. We report the case of a 42-year-old female patient with a known medical history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, presenting with acute onset behavioural changes suggestive of psychosis to a tertiary care centre in Muscat, Oman in 2022. Further evaluation revealed an ACTH dependent Cushing's disease with a pituitary microadenoma. The patient was admitted for endoscopic resection of the adenoma. During the peri-operative period, she experienced worsening of psychosis in addition to delirium. She also developed episodes of unresponsiveness, posturing, severe diaphoresis and dyspnoea accompanied by tachycardia and hypertension which were managed with midazolam and levetiracetam. A seizure work-up and computed tomography brain scan were unremarkable. At follow-up, she showed full resolution of symptoms with good blood pressure and glycaemic control.

The Adverse Effects of Commonly Prescribed Antiseizure Medications in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic screening can help identify antiseizure medication (ASM)-associated adverse events (AEs) that may preclude patients from reaching effective doses or completing adequate trial periods. The Adverse Event Profile (AEP) is a self-completed instrument to identify the frequency of common AEs associated with ASM use. This study aimed to compare the AE profile of commonly used ASMs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. METHODS: The Human Epilepsy Project is a prospective, international, observational study investigating markers of treatment response in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Participants were enrolled within 4 months of treatment initiation. Adult participants on levetiracetam, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or oxcarbazepine monotherapy who completed the AEP and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview at enrollment were included. Multivariable generalized linear and penalized logistic regression models assessed differences in total and itemized marginal AEP scores and dichotomized responses ("never/rarely" vs "sometimes/always"). RESULTS: A total of 225 adults initiated on levetiracetam (n = 132, 59%), lamotrigine (n = 55, 24%), carbamazepine (n = 19, 8.4%), or oxcarbazepine (n = 19, 8.4%) were included. There were no significant differences in AEP total scores between ASMs. Patients with depression (adjusted marginal score ratio [aMSR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39, p = 0.001) and anxiety (aMSR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = 0.007) had worse AEP total scores than those without. After adjusting for depression and anxiety, levetiracetam users were >3 times more likely to report feelings of aggression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.07-10.7, p = 0.038) and almost half as likely to experience unsteadiness (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.99, p = 0.047) than lamotrigine users. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine had the highest rates of discontinuation (42.1%, each), followed by levetiracetam (34.8%) and lamotrigine (16.4%). Levetiracetam users had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone (18%), and lamotrigine had the lowest (5%). DISCUSSION: Systematic screening for AEs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy on ASM monotherapy showed that those with comorbid psychiatric conditions report greater AEs overall, irrespective of ASM. Levetiracetam was associated with >3-fold risk of psychiatric AEs and half the risk of experiencing unsteadiness than lamotrigine. Levetiracetam had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone, while lamotrigine had the lowest.

Cognitive outcomes after fetal exposure to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproate or levetiracetam monotherapy: Data from the EURAP neurocognitive extension protocol.

PURPOSE: Prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications (ASMs) has been associated with an increased risk of major malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, with the latter being mainly associated with valproate (VPA). Our aim was to compare neurocognitive outcome at age 6-7 years in children exposed prenatally to lamotrigine (LTG), carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA) or levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy. METHODS: Eligible mother-child pairs were identified from the observational prospective multinational EURAP cohort study. Assessor-blinded testing was conducted at age 6-7 years using WISC-III and NEPSY-II. Verbal IQ (VIQ), performance IQ (PIQ), full scale IQ (FSIQ) and performance in neuropsychological tasks were compared across ASM groups by ANOVA. Scores were adjusted for maternal IQ, paternal education, maternal epilepsy type and child sex. RESULTS: Of 169 children enrolled in the study, 162 (LTG n = 80, CBZ n = 37, VPA n = 27, LEV n = 18) had sufficient data from WISC-III, NEPSY-II or both, and were included in the analyses. Observed (unadjusted) PIQ and FSIQ did not differ across exposure groups, but a difference was identified for VIQ (P<0.05), with children exposed to VPA having lower scores than children exposed to LEV (P<0.05) and children from all groups combined (P<0.01). Adjusted VIQ, PIQ and FSIQ scores did not differ significantly across groups, but VPA-exposed children had borderline significantly lower adjusted VIQ scores than children from all groups combined (P=0.051). VPA-exposed children had lower scores in comprehension of instructions before and after adjustment for confounding variables than children exposed to LTG (P<0.001), LEV (P<0.01) or children from all groups combined (p < 0.001). The VPA-exposed group also had lower scores in immediate and delayed memory for faces compared to children exposed to CBZ (P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively) and LTG (P<0.05 and P<0.02, respectively), and children from all groups combined (P<0.02 and P<0.001, respectively). LEV-exposed children had lower scores in delayed memory for names than children exposed to LTG (P<0.001), CBZ (P<0.001), VPA (P<0.05) and children from all groups combined (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous reports, our results provide evidence for an adverse effect of prenatal exposure to valproate on verbal development. Our finding of relatively weaker performance of VPA-exposed children compared to other ASM exposures in both comprehension of instructions and face memory also suggest that children of mothers treated with VPA are at increased risk for compromised memory functions or altered processing of socially relevant information.

Antiseizure Medications in Adult Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of any antiseizure medication on the incidence of early post-traumatic seizures among adult patients with traumatic brain injury. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS were searched from inception to October 2023. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials of adult patients with traumatic brain injury evaluating any antiseizure medication compared with either placebo or another agent. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Our main outcome of interest was the occurrence of early seizures (i.e., within 7 d); secondary outcomes included late-seizures and all-cause mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to derive risk ratios (RRs) alongside 95% credible intervals (CrIs). We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to rate the certainty in our findings. Overall, ten individual randomized controlled trials (1851 participants) were included. Compared with placebo, phenytoin (RR, 0.28; 95% CrI, 0.13-0.57; moderate certainty) and levetiracetam (RR, 0.20; 95% CrI, 0.07-0.60; moderate certainty) were associated with a reduction in the risk of early seizures. Carbamazepine may be associated with a reduced risk of early seizures, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR, 0.41; 95% CrI, 0.12-1.27; very low certainty). Valproic acid may result in little to no difference in the risk of early seizures, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR, 0.97; 95% CrI, 0.16-9.00; very low certainty). The evidence is very uncertain about the impact of any antiseizure medication on the risk of late seizures or all-cause mortality at longest reported follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Phenytoin or levetiracetam reduce the risk of early seizures among adult patients with traumatic brain injury. Further research is needed to evaluate required duration of therapy and long-term safety profiles.

Effect of Levetiracetam on Oxidant-Antioxidant Activity during Long-Term Temporal Lobe Epilepsy in Rats.

Epilepsy is a disorder characterized by a predisposition to generate seizures. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure drug that has demonstrated oxidant-antioxidant effects during the early stages of epilepsy in several animal models. However, the effect of LEV on oxidant-antioxidant activity during long-term epilepsy has not been studied. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the effects of LEV on the concentrations of five antioxidant enzymes and on the levels of four oxidant stress markers in the hippocampus of rats with temporal lobe epilepsy at 5.7 months after status epilepticus (SE). The results revealed that superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was significantly greater in the epileptic group (EPI) than in the control (CTRL), CTRL + LEV and EPI + LEV groups. No significant differences were found among the groups' oxidant markers. However, the ratios of SOD/hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), SOD/glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and SOD/GPx + catalase (CAT) were greater in the EPI group than in the CTRL and EPI + LEV groups. Additionally, there was a positive correlation between SOD activity and GPx activity in the EPI + LEV group. LEV-mediated modulation of the antioxidant system appears to be time dependent; at 5.7 months after SE, the role of LEV may be as a stabilizer of the redox state.

Evaluation of levetiracetam loading dose in adult patients with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus.

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency defined as continued seizure activity greater than five minutes or recurrent seizure activity without return to baseline. Benzodiazepine-refractory SE is continuous seizure activity despite treatment with a benzodiazepine. Treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE includes levetiracetam with loading doses ranging from 20 mg/kg to 60 mg/kg up to a maximum dose of 4500 mg. While levetiracetam has minimal adverse effects, there is currently a lack of studies directly comparing the safety and efficacy of various loading doses of levetiracetam. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three loading doses of levetiracetam in the setting of benzodiazepine-refractory SE. METHODS: This was a single center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with benzodiazepine-refractory SE who were treated with levetiracetam from April 1, 2016, to August 31, 2023. Patients with documented hypersensitivity to levetiracetam, those who were pregnant or incarcerated and patients who received an alternative antiepileptic drug (AED) prior to levetiracetam were excluded. Patients with other identifiable causes of SE including hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia or who were post cardiac arrest were also excluded. Patients were divided into three arms based on loading dose of levetiracetam administered (≤20 mg/kg [LEVlow], 21--39 mg/kg [LEVmed] or ≥40 mg/kg [LEVhigh]). The primary endpoint was the rate of seizure termination, defined as the lack of need for an additional AED within 60 min following levetiracetam administration. Secondary outcomes included the rate of intubation, and recurrent seizure activity 60 min to 24 h post seizure termination as defined by positive EEG results or need for an additional AED. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the influence of adequate loading doses of benzodiazepines, and outpatient levetiracetam use. RESULTS: Overall, 740 patients were screened for inclusion, with 218 patients being included in the primary analysis. Patients were divided into three groups with an average levetiracetam loading dose of 14.5 mg/kg in the LEVlow group, 28.8 mg/kg in the LEVmed group, and 48.8 mg/kg in the LEVhigh group. There was no difference in rates of seizure termination at 60 min (92.9% LEVlow vs 89.3% LEVmed vs 84.7% LEVhigh; p = 0.377). Additionally, no difference was found in rates of recurrent seizure activity between 60 min and 24 h post levetiracetam loading dose (32.1% LEVlow vs 32.0% LEVmed vs 28.8% LEVhigh; p = 0.899). However, the LEVhigh group did have a higher rate of intubation (45.8%) compared to the LEVmed (28.2%) and LEVlow (26.8%) group (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: The loading of levetiracetam did not result in a statistically significant difference in rate of seizure termination at 60 min nor did it appear to impact the rate of recurrent seizures at 24 h. However, we did find higher rates of intubation in patients who received levetiracetam >40 mg/kg. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal loading dose of levetiracetam in benzodiazepine-refractory SE.

A comparison of the antiepileptogenic efficacy of two rationally chosen multitargeted drug combinations in a rat model of posttraumatic epilepsy.

Post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a recurrent and often drug-refractory seizure disorder caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI). No single drug treatment prevents PTE, but preventive drug combinations that may prophylax against PTE have not been studied. Based on a systematic evaluation of rationally chosen drug combinations in the intrahippocampal kainate (IHK) mouse model of acquired epilepsy, we identified two multi-targeted drug cocktails that exert strong antiepileptogenic effects. The first, a combination of levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate, only partially prevented spontaneous recurrent seizures in the model. We therefore added atorvastatin (ATV) to the therapeutic cocktail (TC) to increase efficacy, forming "TC-001". The second cocktail - a combination of LEV, ATV, and ceftriaxone, termed "TC-002" - completely prevented epilepsy in the mouse IHK model. In the present proof-of-concept study, we tested whether the two drug cocktails prevent epilepsy in a rat PTE model in which recurrent electrographic seizures develop after severe rostral parasagittal fluid percussion injury (FPI). Following FPI, rats were either treated over 3-4 weeks with vehicle or drug cocktails, starting either 1 or 4-6 h after the injury. Using mouse doses of TC-001 and TC-002, no significant antiepileptogenic effect was obtained in the rat PTE model. However, when using allometric scaling of drug doses to consider the differences in body surface area between mice and rats, PTE was prevented by TC-002. Furthermore, the latter drug cocktail partially prevented the loss of perilesional cortical parvalbumin-positive GABAergic interneurons. Plasma and brain drug analysis showed that these effects of TC-002 occurred at clinically relevant levels of the individual TC-002 drug components. In silico analysis of drug-drug brain protein interactions by the STITCH database indicated that TC-002 impacts a larger functional network of epilepsy-relevant brain proteins than each drug alone, providing a potential network pharmacology explanation for the observed antiepileptogenic and neuroprotective effects observed with this combination.

Levetiracetam versus carbamazepine monotherapy in the management of pediatric focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Levetiracetam (LEV) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are effective monotherapies for focal epilepsy in children. However, the best drug remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing LEV and CBZ monotherapy in the management of pediatric focal epilepsy (PFE). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 2024 comparing LEV and CBZ monotherapy in PFE. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.2, heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB-2 tool. Risk Ratios (RR) with p < 0.05 were considered significant. The outcomes of interest were seizure freedom, any adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, dermatologic adverse events, and the frequency of at least one seizure, defined as the proportion of patients experiencing one or more seizures during the treatment period. Four RCTs comprising 381 children with a mean age of 7.32 to 9.28 years were included, of whom 186 (48.8%) received LEV monotherapy. There was no significant difference between groups (RR: 1.15; 95% CI 0.88-1.50; p = 0.31; I2 = 90%) regarding seizure freedom. The frequency of at least one seizure (RR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.97; p = 0.03; I2 = 8%) and dermatologic adverse events (RR: 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) were both significantly lower in the LEV group. There were no significant differences in the presence of any adverse events (RR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.33-1.01; p = 0.05; I2 = 36%) or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (RR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.13-3.42; p = 0.63; I2 = 30%).Conclusion: In monotherapy, LEV was more advantageous than CBZ for PFE, with a lower frequency of seizures and fewer dermatological adverse events. However, both drugs are equally effective in achieving seizure freedom, adverse events without specification, and those that lead to treatment discontinuation. Our findings have important implications for clinical practice and decision-making in this condition.

The Effect of Levetiracetam and Valproic Acid Treatment on Anger and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Clinical Features in Children and Adolescents with Epilepsy: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antiseizure medications (ASMs) can potentially trigger psychobehavioral adverse events associated with the onset or exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms such as irritability, aggression, and hyperactivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of levetiracetam and valproic acid on changes in clinical features of anger, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). The purpose was to furnish guidance on rational drug selection in children and adolescents with epilepsy to minimize psychiatric comorbidity in the treatment of epilepsy. METHOD: This was a prospective, observational, cohort study involving treatment-naïve children aged 7-18 years with newly diagnosed generalized or focal epilepsy who were prescribed levetiracetam or valproic acid as monotherapy for a 6-month period and regularly followed up. Psychiatric assessment was conducted at the time of the new epilepsy diagnosis and at the six-month follow-up. These assessments were performed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Current and Lifetime Version (DSM-5), a structured psychiatric interview, as well as the State-Trait Anger Expression Style Inventory and Turgay DSM-IV Based Disruptive Behaviour Disorders Screening and Rating Scale. Anger subscores, ADHD symptoms, change in diagnosis, focal and generalized epilepsy groups, continuous seizures and seizure-free periods before and 6 months after treatment with valproic acid and levetiracetam were compared. RESULTS: A total of 50 children, 25 in the valproic acid group and 25 in the levetiracetam group, with a mean age of 11.92 ± 3.08 years, were included in the study. There was a statistically significant increase in the ADHD subscale score post-treatment among patients receiving levetiracetam (p = 0.045) and valproic acid (p = 0.034) compared with pre-treatment. The change in both anger-in and anger-out expression scores with treatment was significantly higher in patients receiving levetiracetam (p = 0.035) compared with those receiving valproic acid (p = 0.026). Statistically, there was a significant difference in the diagnostic criteria of the levetiracetam group pre- and post-treatment (p = 0.026). The proportion of patients in whom the diagnostic criteria for ADHD+ODD were fulfilled increased from 16% before treatment to 48% after treatment, a statistically significant increase (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: This study found an increase in internalized anger features and ADHD symptom severity in children with epilepsy treated with valproic acid and levetiracetam. In those prescribed levetiracetam, there was a statistically significant rise in the proportion meeting the diagnostic criteria for ADHD + ODD. Our research is one of the first to prospectively examine the psychiatric assessment of children diagnosed with epilepsy. The remarkable results demonstrate changes in psychiatric diagnoses associated with the treatment of levetiracetam and valproic acid. Furthermore, a considerable rise in ADHD symptoms was observed in those treated with valproic acid.

Efficiency and safety of high-dose undiluted intravenous push levetiracetam loading doses compared to intravenous infusion in seizing patients: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous (IV) push (IVP) is an alternative administration method for levetiracetam, but evidence evaluating it compared to IV piggyback (IVPB) for loading doses in acutely seizing patients is limited, particularly in patients with status epilepticus (SE). This study aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of IVP versus IVPB levetiracetam loading doses. METHODS: This was a single-center sequential retrospective study conducted in adult (≥18 years) patients who received an IV levetiracetam loading dose (>2000 mg or ≥20 mg/kg) for acute or suspected seizure. The primary outcome was time to administration, compared between doses given as IVP versus IVPB. Secondary outcomes included rates of adverse events (AEs), rescue benzodiazepine or antiseizure medication administration, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission between groups. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included; 116 received IVP and 130 received IVPB loading doses. Median age was 56 years; most patients were male (62%) and White (60%) and had witnessed seizures (67%). Doses were administered for SE in 32 (27.5%) and 46 (35.4%) patients in the IVP and IVPB arms, respectively. Median time to administration was shorter in the IVP group (12 vs. 38 min, p < .001). Bradycardia (1.7% vs. 2.3%, p = .99), hypotension (7.8% vs. 12%, p = .30), sedation (6% vs. 12.3%, p = .09), intubation (10% vs. 8%, p = .37), ICU admission (32% vs. 39%, p = .31), and rescue medication administration (8.6% vs. 14.6% p = .10) were similar between groups. In SE patients, IVP was associated with shorter time to administration (12 vs. 44 min, p = .003) and lower odds of ICU admission after adjustment for age, dose, Status Epilepticus Severity Score, and seizure history (adjusted odds ratio = .23, 95% confidence interval = .06-.81). SIGNIFICANCE: IVP reduced time to levetiracetam administration versus IVPB and was not associated with more AEs. Rescue agent use, intubation, and ICU admission were similar between arms, but IVP may reduce ICU admissions in SE patients. Prospective studies should assess the effectiveness of IVP versus IVPB.

Lamotrigine vs levetiracetam in female patients of childbearing age with juvenile absence epilepsy: A Bayesian reanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: Women of childbearing age with juvenile absence epilepsy (JAE) face treatment challenges due to limited access to safe and effective anti-seizure medications (ASMs). In a previous study we compared the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG) in women with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), highlighting a superiority of LEV in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. In this study, we specifically reanalyzed, through a Bayesian approach and by expanding the previously published cohort, the comparative effectiveness of these ASMs as initial monotherapy in JAE. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, comparative effectiveness study on women of childbearing age diagnosed with JAE and prescribed LEV or LTG as the initial ASM. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) Bayesian Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate treatment failure (TF) due to ineffectiveness and ASM retention. The patients' center of provenance and year of prescription were considered as random effect factors. Posterior probabilities and relative log-risk distribution were computed, and the distribution of posterior draws was analyzed to assess the evidence supporting LTG superiority over LEV. RESULTS: Of 123 patients, those treated with LTG (n = 67) demonstrated lower TF and higher ASM retention than those treated with LEV (n = 56), with the IPTW-weighted Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model showing a 99.2% posterior probability of LTG being superior on TF and a 99.5% probability on ASM retention. Additional analyses on ≥50% and ≥75% seizure reduction through IPTW-weighted Bayesian logistic regression largely confirmed these findings, whereas the two ASMs did not show evident differences in terms of seizure freedom. The two ASMs showed comparable safety profiles, with only a minority of patients discontinuing treatment due to side effects. SIGNIFICANCE: Bayesian reanalysis supports LTG as first-line monotherapy for JAE in women of childbearing age, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment strategies in women with IGE. This study underscores the value of Bayesian methods in refining clinical research and treatment decisions.

Is there any concern of insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunctions with antiseizure medications? A prospective comparative study of valproate vs. levetiracetam.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of insulin resistance and its association with change in serum anti-seizure medication (ASM) level and their pharmacokinetic, body composition and metabolic hormones after six months of levetiracetam (LEV) exposure in persons with epilepsy (PWE) in comparison to valproate (VPA). METHODS: This prospective-longitudinal study included clinically diagnosed PWE on VPA or LEV monotherapy (for<3 months). At enrolment, body weight/composition, BMI were measured and blood samples were collected for assessing metabolic dysfunctions by estimation of serum insulin, insulin resistance [in terms of Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)], leptin, adiponectin, lipid profile along with ASMs level. Subjects were followed up for six months and all the above parameters were reassessed. RESULTS: A total of 150 PWE were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 105 number of subjects were enrolled (n = 35 in VPA and n = 70 in LEV group). Out of them, 92 subjects (n = 32 in VPA; n = 60 in LEV) completed six months follow-up. After six months, serum insulin level increased significantly in VPA group compared to baseline p < 0.001). Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR>2.5) was observed in 14.28 % of PWE in VPA group. Significantly higher percentage-change in body-weight (p = 0.003), leptin and decreased adiponectin were found in VPA-group compared to baseline ((p = 0.003, 0.02, 0.001, <0.001, respectively). These changes were independent of serum level or pharmacokinetic of VPA. On the other hand, no such changes were observed in LEV-group despite increased serum LEV level and altered pharmacokinetic parameters after six months. CONCLUSION: Six months treatment with VPA resulted in insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunctions in PWE. These alterations were not correlated with change in VPA serum level. These changes were not observed in LEV therapy suggesting its better safety profile. This may be considered while prescribing the ASM like VPA and LEV in adult patients with obesity or insulin resistance and diabetes.

Clinical characteristics and treatment approach of established New-Onset status epilepticus (eNOSE): A Real-World multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION: Status Epilepticus (SE) can occur in patients without a previous epilepsy diagnosis, a condition identified as "new-onset status epilepticus" (NOSE). Treatment with benzodiazepine may fail in NOSE termination, requiring anti-seizure medication (ASM) employment. The term "established NOSE" (eNOSE) is generally employed in this context. This study aims to describe the main clinical characteristics of a large sample of patients suffering from eNOSE, compare the ASM efficacy, and explore the risk factors associated with ASM treatment unresponsiveness and eNOSE-associated mortality. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with eNOSE were retrospectively selected between January 2016 and December 2022. We reviewed demographics, clinical data, diagnostic work-up, and treatment. We considered the last ASM introduced before the eNOSE termination as effective. RESULTS: 123 patients were included (age: 67.9 ± 17.3). eNOSE acute etiology was mostly reported. In the overall cohort, phenytoin showed the highest response rate (p = 0.01). In the pairwise comparisons, valproate was superior to levetiracetam (p = 0.02) but not to lacosamide (p = 0.50). Phenytoin had a significantly higher resolution rate than levetiracetam (p = 0.001) but not lacosamide (p = 0.14). Thirty patients were refractory to ASM treatment. No predictors of refractoriness were identified. Thirty-nine patients died. Age and GCS were identified as eNOSE-related mortality risk factors. CONCLUSION: eNOSE frequently has an acute etiology with several associated syndromes. Phenytoin is more effective in managing eNOSE, even though lacosamide, valproate, and levetiracetam can represent further therapeutic options. Age and GCS are the main risk factors for eNOSE-associated mortality.

Trends in prescription of anti-seizure medications in Japan between 2018 and 2021: A retrospective study using the National Database Open Data Japan.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to analyze anti-seizure medication (ASM) prescription trends in Japan, particularly among older adults and women of childbearing age, to inform future treatment strategies and optimize ASM selection criteria. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Database Open Data Japan for fiscal years (FY) 2018-2021, covering prescriptions across sex and 5-year age groups. We conducted data imputation for prescriptions under 1,000 units to maintain anonymity, calculated the estimated number of patients using standard adult maintenance doses, and adjusted for pediatric dosing using Augsberger's formula. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed a 7.6% increase in ASM usage, with a notable shift from older to newer ASMs, such as levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG). LEV and LTG prescriptions increased by 26.7% and 15.0% from FY 2018 to FY 2021, respectively, whereas older ASMs such as phenytoin, declined. Sex-specific analysis showed a higher LTG prescription rate among women, especially in adolescent and young adult cohorts, where the female-to-male prescription ratio increased from 1.65 to 1.85. Valproate (VPA) and LEV accounted for 57.0% of ASM prescriptions in older adults. The number of inpatient LTG prescriptions was notably lower than that of outpatient LTG prescriptions across age groups. Pediatric use of generics was lower than that in other age groups. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that newer ASMs are being used increasingly, with a significant proportion of VPA continuously prescribed among women of childbearing age. In older adults, VPA and LEV accounted for more than half of the ASM prescriptions. These findings are crucial for developing future treatment strategies and improving the ASM selection criteria.

An international study to investigate and optimise the safety of discontinuing valproate in young men and women with epilepsy: Protocol.

Valproate is the most effective treatment for idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Currently, its use is restricted in women of childbearing potential owing to high teratogenicity. Recent evidence extended this risk to men's offspring, prompting recommendations to restrict use in everybody aged <55 years. This study will evaluate mortality and morbidity risks associated with valproate withdrawal by emulating a hypothetical randomised-controlled trial (called a "target trial") using retrospective observational data. The data will be drawn from ~250m mainly US patients in the TriNetX repository and ~60m UK patients in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). These will be scanned for individuals aged 16-54 years with epilepsy and on valproate who either continued, switched to lamotrigine or levetiracetam, or discontinued valproate between 2014-2024, creating four groups. Randomisation to these groups will be emulated by baseline confounder adjustment using g-methods. Mortality and morbidity outcomes will be assessed and compared between groups over 1-10 years, employing time-to-first-event and recurrent events analyses. A causal prediction model will be developed from these data to aid in predicting the safest alternative antiseizure medications. Together, these findings will optimise informed decision-making about valproate withdrawal and alternative treatment selection, providing immediate and vital information for patients, clinicians and regulators.

A Comparison of Pre- and Post-Treatment Cranial MRI Characteristics in Patients with Pediatric Epilepsy Receiving Levetiracetam.

Background and Objectives: This study was performed for the purpose of assessing whether antiepileptic levetiracetam treatment produces a change in brain volumes in children with epilepsy. To that end, we compared the volumes of the basal ganglia (caudate nucleus, putamen, globus, hip-pocampus, and thalamus) at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after treatment (months 18-24) in pediatric epilepsy patients using levetiracetam. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study involved a volumetric comparison of patients presenting to the Balikesir University Medical Faculty pediatric neurology clinic between 01.08.2019 and 01.11.2023 and diagnosed with epilepsy, and who underwent cranial MRI before and 18-24 months after treatment at the radiology department. The demographic and clinical characteristics (age, sex, family history of epilepsy, type of epilepsy, and EEG features (normal, abnormal, epileptiform)) of the patients included in the study were recorded. Results: The comparison of basal ganglia volumes at cranial MRI before and at months 18-24 of treatment revealed significant differences in the left caudate nucleus, right putamen, left putamen, left globus pallidus, right thalamus, left thalamus, and right hippocampal regions. Conclusions: In conclusion, differing findings are encountered at cranial imaging in patients with epilepsy, depending on the seizure frequency, activity, and the type of antiepileptic drugs used. This study compared basal ganglia volumes on cranial MRIs taken before and 18-24 months after treatment in pediatric epilepsy patients using levetiracetam. A significant increase was observed in the volumes of basal ganglia (caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, hippocampus, and thalamus) on the MRIs of pediatric epilepsy patients using levetiracetam.

Perfil de prescripción de levetiracetam en niños menores de cuatro años atendidos en un hospital de alta complejidad de Chile / Levetiracetam prescription profile in children younger than 4 years treated at a tertiary care hospital in Chile

Introducción. El levetiracetam (LEV) es un antiepiléptico aprobado por el Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile como terapia concomitante en crisis epilépticas en niños mayores de cuatro años. Sin embargo, es ampliamente indicado desde el periodo neonatal, lo que hace necesario evaluar su utilización fuera de ficha técnica. Objetivo. Determinar el perfil de prescripción-indicación de LEV en el tratamiento de las crisis epilépticas en menores de cuatro años en un hospital de alta complejidad del sur de Chile. Población y método. Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo. Se revisaron las historias clínicas de quienes iniciaron tratamiento con LEV entre 2014 y 2019, y se recopilaron datos sobre variables sociodemográficas, farmacológicas y clínicas. El análisis se basó en la descripción del perfil de los pacientes, prescripción, seguimiento y seguridad. Resultados. Se incluyeron 68 pacientes: 40 (58,8 %) de sexo masculino, 49 (72,1 %) con edad gestacional ≥ 37 semanas. La etiología principal de la epilepsia fue de tipo estructural (35,3 %); el LEV se utilizó principalmente en niños diagnosticados con malformación del sistema nervioso central (17,6 %) y predominó la monoterapia (55,9 %). En el 50 % se usó LEV para crisis focales. Cinco niños (7,3 %) presentaron trastornos de tipo psiquiátrico clasificados como probables reacciones adversas al medicamento. Conclusión. El LEV se utilizó en niños con diferentes diagnósticos con baja frecuencia de eventos adversos. El perfil de utilización varió en los diferentes grupos etarios. Es necesario identificar en futuros estudios la efectividad especialmente en el recién nacido y en epilepsias refractarias.

Introduction. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiepileptic drug approved by the Chilean Institute of Public Health as concomitant therapy for epileptic seizures in children older than 4 years of age. However, it is widely prescribed from the neonatal period, which makes it necessary to evaluate its off-label use. Objective. To determine the prescription-indication profile of LEV in the treatment of epileptic seizures in children younger than 4 years in a tertiary care hospital in southern Chile. Population and method. Observational, descriptive, and retrospective study. The medical records of patients who started treatment with LEV between 2014 and 2019 were reviewed, and data on sociodemographic, pharmacological, and clinical variables were collected. The analysis was based on the description of the profile of patients, prescriptions, follow-up, and safety. Results. A total of 68 patients were included: 40 (58.8%) were males, 49 (72.1%) were born at a gestational age ≥ 37 weeks. The main etiology of epilepsy was structural (35.3%); LEV was mostly used in children diagnosed with central nervous system malformation (17.6%), and monotherapy was the prevailing dosage (55.9%). LEV was used for focal seizures in 50% of cases. Five children (7.3%) had psychiatric disorders, classified as probable adverse drug reactions. Conclusion. LEV was used in children with various diagnoses, with a low rate of adverse events. The profile of drug use varied in the different age groups. Future studies are needed to identify effectiveness, especially in newborn infants and patients with refractory epilepsy.

Levetiracetam Prevents Neurophysiological Changes and Preserves Cognitive Function in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Transactivator of Transcription Transgenic Mouse Model of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) affects nearly half of the 39 million people living with HIV. HAND symptoms range from subclinical cognitive impairment to dementia; the mechanisms that underlie HAND remain unclear and there is no treatment. The HIV protein transactivator of transcription (TAT) is thought to contribute to HAND because it persists in the central nervous system and elicits neurotoxicity in animal models. Network hyperexcitability is associated with accelerated cognitive decline in neurodegenerative disorders. Here we show that the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) attenuated aberrant excitatory synaptic transmission, protected synaptic plasticity, reduced seizure susceptibility, and preserved cognition in inducible TAT (iTAT) transgenic male mice. iTAT mice had an increased frequency of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents in hippocampal slice recordings and impaired long-term potentiation, a form of synaptic plasticity that underlies learning and memory. Two-week administration of LEV by osmotic minipump prevented both impairments. Kainic acid administered to iTAT mice induced a higher maximum behavioral seizure score, longer seizure duration, and shorter latency to first seizure, consistent with a lower seizure threshold. LEV treatment prevented these in vivo signs of hyperexcitability. Lastly, in the Barnes maze, iTAT mice required more time to reach the goal, committed more errors, and received lower cognitive scores relative to iTAT mice treated with LEV. Thus, TAT expression drives functional deficits, suggesting a causative role in HAND. As LEV not only prevented aberrant synaptic activity in iTAT mice but also prevented cognitive dysfunction, it may provide a promising pharmacological approach to the treatment of HAND. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Approximately half of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) also suffer from HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND), for which there is no treatment. The HIV protein transactivator of transcription (TAT) causes toxicity that is thought to contribute to HAND. Here, the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) prevented synaptic and cognitive impairments in a TAT-expressing mouse. LEV is widely used to treat seizures and is well-tolerated in humans, including those with HIV. This study supports further investigation of LEV-mediated neuroprotection in HAND.