Return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament surgery with hamstring or patella tendon autograft - a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: In orthopaedics, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions are among the most common surgical interventions. Two methods are preferably used: autografts from the hamstring tendon (HT) or patella tendon (PT). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare these two methods when returning to sports. METHODS: Eleven studies were included based on a literature search conducted in PubMed. The primary outcome was return to preinjury sport level in athletes. Post-operative results such as the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the Tegner Activity Score and KT-1000 arthrometry and autograft re-rupture rates were analysed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis showed no significant difference in return to preinjury sports level at a two-year follow-up between patients operated with hamstring or patella autograft. Considering the secondary outcomes, no significant differences were recorded in Lysholm score, IKDC score or re-rupture rate. The Tegner Activity Scale demonstrated a significantly higher activity level in the PT group than in the HT group (OR 0.79, p = 0.003). At the two-year follow-up, the KT-1000 arthrometer analysis also showed a significant difference in laxity, which was higher for the HT autografts (OR -0.31, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant differences between hamstring and patella autografts. Even so, the choice of method when operated for ACL rupture remains crucial for the individual and should be a weighted decision made jointly by the patient and the physician.

Eighteen-year outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient reported outcomes and radiographic arthritic changes of transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstrings (HS) auto-grafts at a minimum of 15-year follow-up. METHODS: Ninety-four patients (51 of the HS group, 43 of BPTB group) who were operated between the years 2000 to 2005 in two tertiary referral hospitals were contacted and invited to a retrospective evaluation. The interview included subjective outcomes using the Lysholm knee scoring questionnaire, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Tegner activity level scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and patients' satisfaction scale. Knee examination included measurements of motion and stability. Knee radiographs were evaluated for osteoarthritic changes according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score. RESULTS: The average evaluation time from surgery was 18.6 years. Subjectively, there was no significant difference between groups except for a better post-operative level of activity and satisfaction in the HS group. Objectively, there was no significant difference between groups in knee stability and range of motion. Most patients had grade KL ≤ 1 radiographic osteoarthritits changes and there was no significant difference between groups. Recurrent complete tear of the reconstructed graft occurred in 3 patients of each group. In both groups 84% had no further surgery while the indications for further surgery were mostly a meniscal tear or tibial hardware removal. CONCLUSIONS: Very long-term outcomes and clinical stability of transtibial HS or BPTB graft ACL reconstruction are good with low rate of graft failure and radiographic osteoarthritis.

Unsupervised Machine Learning of the Combined Danish and Norwegian Knee Ligament Registers: Identification of 5 Distinct Patient Groups With Differing ACL Revision Rates.

BACKGROUND: Most clinical machine learning applications use a supervised learning approach using labeled variables. In contrast, unsupervised learning enables pattern detection without a prespecified outcome. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to apply unsupervised learning to the combined Danish and Norwegian knee ligament register (KLR) with the goal of detecting distinct subgroups. It was hypothesized that resulting groups would have differing rates of subsequent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) revision. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: K-prototypes clustering was performed on the complete case KLR data. After performing the unsupervised learning analysis, the authors defined clinically relevant characteristics of each cluster using variable summaries, surgeons' domain knowledge, and Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis. RESULTS: Five clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (revision rate, 9.9%) patients were young (mean age, 22 years; SD, 6 years), received hamstring tendon (HT) autograft (91%), and had lower baseline Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sport and Recreation (Sports) scores (mean, 25.0; SD, 15.6). Cluster 2 (revision rate, 6.9%) patients received HT autograft (89%) and had higher baseline KOOS Sports scores (mean, 67.2; SD, 16.5). Cluster 3 (revision rate, 4.7%) patients received bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft (94%) and had higher baseline KOOS Sports scores (mean, 65.8; SD, 16.4). Cluster 4 (revision rate, 4.1%) patients received BPTB or QT autograft (88%) and had low baseline KOOS Sports scores (mean, 20.5; SD, 14.0). Cluster 5 (revision rate, 3.1%) patients were older (mean age, 42 years; SD, 7 years), received HT autograft (89%), and had low baseline KOOS Sports scores (mean, 23.4; SD, 17.6). CONCLUSION: Unsupervised learning identified 5 distinct KLR patient subgroups and each grouping was associated with a unique ACLR revision rate. Patients can be approximately classified into 1 of the 5 clusters based on only 3 variables: age, graft choice (HT, BPTB, or QT autograft), and preoperative KOOS Sports subscale score. If externally validated, the resulting groupings may enable quick risk stratification for future patients undergoing ACLR in the clinical setting. Patients in cluster 1 are considered high risk (9.9%), cluster 2 patients medium risk (6.9%), and patients in clusters 3 to 5 low risk (3.1%-4.7%) for revision ACLR.

Regional healing trajectory of the patellar tendon after bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Graft site morbidities after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) negatively impacts rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to establish tendon structural properties 1-month after BPTB autograft harvest compared to the uninvolved patellar tendon, and subsequently to quantify the healing trajectory of the patellar tendon over the course of rehabilitation. Patellar tendon morphology (ultrasound) and mechanical properties (continuous shear wave elastography) from 3 regions of the tendon (medial, lateral, central) were measured in 34 participants at 1 month, 3-4 months, and 6-9 months after ACLR. Mixed models were used to compare tendon structure between limbs at 1 month, and quantify healing over 3 timepoints. The involved patellar tendon had increased cross-sectional area and thickness in all regions 1-month after ACLR. Thickness reduced uniformly over time. Possible tendon elongation was observed and remained stable over time. Tendon viscosity was uniform across the three regions in the involved limb while the medial region had higher viscosity in the uninvolved limb, and shear modulus was elevated in all three regions at 1 month. Viscosity and shear modulus in only the central region reduced over time. Statement of Clinical Significance: The entire patellar tendon, and not just the central third, is altered after graft harvest. Tendon structure starts to normalize over time, but alterations remain especially in the central third at the time athletes are returning to sport. Early rehabilitation consisting of tendon loading protocols may be necessary to optimize biologic healing at the graft site tendon.

Editorial Commentary: Quadriceps Tendon Is a Better Graft Than Hamstring for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Over the last 12 years identification of specific risk factors (age, activity level, and laxity) for failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have led to comparisons of the patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring (HS) tendon grafts. The PT has proved superior in most of these studies. During this same time period, there has been increased clinical/research interest in the quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction. This has led to direct comparison to the HS and QT autografts. Again, the HS tendon appears inferior in measured outcomes to the quadriceps tendon. Increased laxity measurements seem to correlate with the decreased evidence of radiographic healing on magnetic resonance imaging. If this is the case, it may indeed be the final nail in the coffin for HS graft use in young at-risk athletic populations.

Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Are Statistically Fragile: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To assess the statistical fragility of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of hamstring tendon autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were queried for RCTs published since 2010 comparing autograft type (bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon) in ACL reconstruction surgery. The fragility index (FI) and reverse FI (rFI) were determined for significant and nonsignificant outcomes, respectively, as the number of outcome reversals required to change statistical significance. The fragility quotient (FQ) and reverse FQ, representing fragility as a proportion of the study population, were calculated by dividing the FI and rFI, respectively, by the sample size. RESULTS: We identified 19 RCTs reporting 55 total dichotomous outcomes. The median FI of the 55 total outcomes was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-7), meaning a median of 5 outcome event reversals would alter the outcomes' significance. Five outcomes were reported as statistically significant with a median FI of 4 (IQR, 2-6), meaning a median of 4 outcome event reversals would change outcomes to be nonsignificant. Fifty outcomes were reported as nonsignificant with a median rFI of 5 (IQR, 4-7), meaning a median of 5 outcome event reversals would change outcomes to be significant. The FQ and reverse FQ for significant and nonsignificant outcomes were 0.025 (IQR, 0.018-0.045) and 0.082 (IQR, 0.041-0.106), respectively. For 61.8% of outcomes, patients lost to follow-up exceeded the corresponding FI or rFI. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial statistical fragility in recent RCTs on autograft choice in ACL reconstruction surgery given that altering a few outcome events is sufficient to reverse study findings. For over half of outcomes, maintaining patients lost to follow-up may have been sufficient to reverse study conclusions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We recommend co-reporting FIs and P values to provide a more comprehensive representation of a study's conclusions when conducting an RCT.

Outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in an all-female soccer player cohort with mean 4.8-year follow up.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose is to compare functional outcomes, return to soccer rates, and revision rates in an all-female soccer player cohort undergoing quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft ACLR versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft ACLR. METHODS: Female soccer players who sustained an ACL rupture and underwent primary anatomic, single-bundle ACLR with BPTB autograft or QT autograft were included. Demographic and surgical characteristics were collected. Outcomes of interest included Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Marx score, return to soccer rates, and failure rates. RESULTS: Data on 23 patients undergoing BPTB autograft ACLR and 14 undergoing QT autograft ACLR was available. Average age was 18.7 years, and average follow up was 4.8 years. Overall, 76 â€‹% (28/37) returned to soccer and 5.4 â€‹% (2/37) underwent revision ACLR. No major significant differences were found in demographic or surgical characteristics. No differences were found in postoperative IKDC scores, preoperative, postoperative, or change from pre-to postoperative Marx activity scores, or pre-and postoperative Tegner scores between the groups. QT autograft ACLR patients had significantly less change in Tegner scores pre-to postoperatively compared to the BTPB autograft ACLR group (0.6 â€‹± â€‹1.2 versus 2.1 â€‹± â€‹1.8; p â€‹= â€‹0.02). Both groups had similar rates of return to soccer [78 â€‹% (18/23) BPTB autograft ACLR versus 71 â€‹% (10/14) QT autograft ACLR; p â€‹= â€‹0.64] and rates of revision (8.7 % (2/23) BPTB autograft ACLR; 0 % (0/14) QT autograft ACLR. CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest that BPTB autograft ACLR and QT autograft ACLR produce comparable, successful functional and return to soccer outcomes in this all-female soccer player cohort study. Larger, prospective studies are needed to improve the strength of conclusions and provide more information on the optimal graft choice for female soccer players. Surgeons can use the results of this study to counsel female soccer players on expected outcomes after ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Strength symmetry after autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative isometric quadriceps strength indices (QI%) and hamstring strength limb symmetry indices (HI%) between partial thickness quadriceps tendon (pQT), full thickness quadriceps tendon (fQT), and bone-patellar-tendon bone (BPTB) autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Patients with primary ACLR with pQT, fQT, or BPTB autograft with the documentation of quantitative postoperative strength assessments between 2016 and 2021 were included. Isometric Biodex data, including QI% and HI% (calculated as the percentage of involved to uninvolved limb strength) were collected between 5 and 8 months and between 9 and 15 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 124 and 51 patients had 5-8- and 9-15-month follow-up strength data, respectively. No significant difference was detected between groups for sex. However, patients undergoing fQT were found to be older than those undergoing BPTB (24.6±7 vs 20.2±5; â€‹p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the number of concomitant meniscus repairs between the groups (pQT vs. fQT vs. BPTB). No significant differences were detected in median (min-max) QI% between pQT, fQT, and BPTB 5-8 months [87 â€‹% (44%-130 â€‹%), 84 â€‹% (44%-110 â€‹%), 82 â€‹% (37%-110 â€‹%) or 9-15 months [89 â€‹% (50%-110 â€‹%), 89 â€‹% (67%-110 â€‹%), and 90 â€‹% (74%-140 â€‹%)] postoperatively. Similarly, no differences were detected in median HI% between the groups 5-8 months or 9-15 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The study was unable to detect differences in the recovery of quadriceps strength between patients undergoing ACLR with pQT, fQT, and BPTB autografts at 5-8 months and 9-15-months postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Editorial Commentary: Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Shows Advantages and Disadvantages.

A quadriceps tendon autograft is becoming an increasingly popular graft option for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. The biomechanical properties of a QT autograft are favorable compared to a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or a doubled hamstring (HS) autograft. A QT autograft is associated with less donor site morbidity, such as anterior knee pain and difficulty with kneeling, than a BPTB autograft, and short-term studies have shown comparable clinical results when compared to a BPTB or a HS autograft. However, if harvested with a bone block, a QT autograft carries a higher risk of patellar fracture than a BPTB autograft. Other potential disadvantages include persistent quadriceps weakness, and registry data have shown a higher revision rate compared to a BPTB or HS ACL reconstruction, which is thought to be due to a high learning curve, leading to higher revision rates in low volume centers. Finally, a graft-fixation construct with good time 0 biomechanical characteristics may only be successful in the long term if the graft heals effectively. Time will tell.

Evaluation of Serum Albumin-Coated Bone Allograft for Bone Regeneration: A Seven-Year Follow-Up Study of 26 Cases.

We have previously reported that serum albumin-coated bone allograft (BoneAlbumin, BA) is an effective bone substitute. It improves bone regeneration at the patellar and tibial donor sites six months after harvesting bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). In the present study, we examined these donor sites seven years after implantation. The study group (N = 10) received BA-enhanced autologous cancellous bone at the tibial and BA alone at the patellar site. The control group (N = 16) received autologous cancellous bone at the tibial and blood clot at the patellar site. We evaluated subcortical density, cortical thickness, and bone defect volume via CT scans. At the patellar site, subcortical density was significantly higher in the BA group at both time points. There was no significant difference in cortical thickness between the two groups at either donor site. The control group's bone defect significantly improved and reached the BA group's values at both sites by year seven. Meanwhile, the bone defects in the BA group did not change significantly and were comparable to the six-month measurements. No complications were observed. There are two limitations in this study: The number of patients recruited is small, and the randomization of the patients could have improved the quality of the study as the control group patients were older compared to the study group patients. Our 7-year results seem to demonstrate that BA is a safe and effective bone substitute that supports faster regeneration of donor sites and results in good-quality bone tissue at the time of ACLR with BPTB autografts. However, studies with a larger number of patients are required to definitively confirm the preliminary results of our study.

Editorial Commentary: What to Reinforce When You Have a Small Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft? Focus on the Anterolateral Side!

Many surgeons performing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have encountered the problem of harvesting small hamstring grafts. For this situation, several options are available such as harvesting contralateral hamstring tendons, reinforce the ACL graft with allografts, take a bone-patellar tendon-bone or quadriceps graft or add an anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Recent studies have shown that the presence of a lateral extra-articular procedure might be more important than the thickness of an isolated ACL graft, which is reassuring news. Current evidence suggests that both anterolateral ligament reconstruction and modified Lemaire tenodesis are similar biomechanically and clinically and could solve the problem of small-diameter hamstring ACL autografts.

Differences in collagen types in the semitendinosus, quadriceps, and patellar tendons: A report using samples from an 11-year-old patient.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the differences in the proportions of types I and type III collagen in the semitendinosus tendon (ST), quadriceps tendon (QT), and patellar tendon (PT), which are frequently used as autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Orthopedic surgeons diagnosed habitual dislocation of the left patella and surgically treated an 11-year-old boy. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, medial patellar tibial ligament reconstruction, and arthroscopic lateral release were performed simultaneously. Tissue samples obtained during treatment that were no longer necessary were used as samples for this study. The samples were fixed, paraffin-embedded, and immunostained for type I and type III collagen. Stained samples were observed under a confocal microscope and evaluated visually and quantitatively to determine the percentages of type I and type III collagen. RESULTS: Visually, the ST had a higher percentage of type III collagen than the PT and QT. The QT and PT were similar in appearance; both consisted mostly of collagen type I. Quantitative evaluation using images showed that the PT comprised 100% type I collagen. The QT comprised 1% type III collagen. The ST comprised 34% type III collagen. CONCLUSION: In this patient, the QT and PT had higher percentages of type I collagen, which is considered physically strong. Type III collagen, which is considered physically weak, was most common in the ST. These factors may be associated with the high re-injury rates after ACL reconstruction using the ST for physically immature patients.

Preoperative ultrasound can accurately predict the diameter of double-stranded peroneus longus tendon autografts.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the correlation between the intraoperative diameter of double-stranded peroneus longus tendon (2PLT) and length of the PLT autograft and preoperative ultrasound (US) measurements, as well as radiographic and anthropometric measurements. The hypothesis was that US can accurately predict the diameter of 2PLT autografts during operation. METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent ligament reconstruction with 2PLT autografts were included. Preoperative US was used to calculate the in situ PLT cross-sectional area (CSA) at seven levels (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 cm proximal to the harvest start point). Femoral width, notch width, notch height, maximum patellar length, and patellar tendon length were determined on preoperative radiographs. Intraoperative measurements of PLT were made, including all fiber lengths of PLT and diameters of 2PLT using sizing tubes calibrated to 0.5 mm. RESULTS: CSA at 1 cm proximal to the harvest site had the highest correlation with the diameter of 2PLT (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). Calf length had the highest correlation with PLT length (r = 0.65, P < 0.001). The diameter of the 2PLT autografts could be predicted by the following formula: 4.6 + 0.2 × [sonographic CSA of PLT at 1 cm level]; the length of PLT could be predicted by the following formula: 5.6 + 0.5 × Calf length. CONCLUSION: The diameter of 2PLT and length of PLT autografts can be accurately predicted by preoperative US and calf length measurements, respectively. Accurate preoperative prediction of the diameter and length of autologous grafts can provide the most suitable and individualized graft for patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction for Chronic Patellar Tendon Tears.

OBJECTIVES: Reconstruction for a chronic patellar tendon rupture in a native knee is an uncommon surgical procedure. Although there have been case series investigating patient-reported outcomes, there is no systematic review of these studies to date. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the literature on this procedure to better understand its outcomes, complications, and surgical technique options. METHODS: A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify studies that reported outcomes and techniques of patellar tendon reconstruction for chronic disruption in native knees. Searches were conducted through MEDLINE using PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and clinicaltrials.gov. RESULTS: Ten studies with 103 patients and 105 knees were included. Results for nonnative (arthroplasty) knees were excluded. The mean patient age was 40.3 years, and the mean postsurgical follow-up time was 53.8 months. Of the 105 knees, 75% received a hamstring tendon graft, whereas 13% received a bone-tendon-bone graft and 7% received a whole extensor mechanism allograft. The mean preoperative range of motion was 113.8°, which improved to 126.0° postoperatively. The mean preoperative Lysholm score was 58.6, which improved to 86.0 postoperatively; 100% of patients returned to their normal work activities and 76% returned to their prior level of physical activity. There were no major complications reported in any of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic patellar tendon disruption in a native knee is an uncommon injury that can result in significant limitations for patients. Although more research is needed to better elucidate which graft is best, outcomes after patellar tendon reconstruction for chronic tears appear to be satisfactory with current techniques.

Graft choices for paediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: State of the art.

The paediatric population is at particularly high risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries due to high rates of sports participation. Other risk factors for ACL injuries in children include but are not limited to being female, generalised ligamentous laxity, a high body mass index (BMI), and poor neuromuscular control. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is commonly done to treat ACL injuries and allow for return to sports and daily activities. ACL repair is another option with ongoing techniques being developed. The high rates of graft failure in children reported in recent publications on ACL repair are very concerning. Special consideration must be taken in ACLR in the skeletally immature patient due to the risk of growth-related complications, such as limb deformity or growth arrest, that can arise from drilling across or disrupting the physis. Graft choices for paediatric ACLR include iliotibial band (ITB) over the top and over the front, hamstring autograft, bone patellar tendon bone (BTB) autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, and allograft. Factors for each graft choice to consider include graft size, graft failure rates, donor site morbidity, requirement for bony tunnels, the post-op rehabilitation process, and return to sport outcomes. Each graft has its benefits and disadvantages for the individual patient, depending on age, skeletal maturity, and goals for recovery. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is another option to consider with paediatric ACLR because LET has been shown to decrease the re-rupture rate in adult ACLR. After surgery, patient follow-up until at least the growth plates are closed is important. This article aims to provide an overview and comparison of the various graft types to aid in the graft choice decision making process for paediatric ACLR.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using a Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Autograft and that Using a Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Autograft.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft and that using a double-bundle hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. METHODS: Consecutive cases of revision ACLRs were reviewed. The Lysholm knee scale and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were recorded at the final follow-up. The pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity measurement using an arthrometer were evaluated before revision ACLR and at final follow-up. Contralateral knee laxity was also evaluated, and side-to-side differences noted. The Lysholm knee scale, KOOS, the pivot shift test, Lachman test, and anterior knee laxity were compared between HT versus BPTB autograft recipient groups using the Mann-Whitney test or the t-test. RESULTS: Forty-one patients who underwent revision ACLR and followed up for at least 2 years were included. The graft source was a BPTB autograft in 23 patients (BPTB group) and a double-bundle HT autograft in 18 patients (HT group). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 44 ± 28 months in the BPTB group and 36 ± 18 in the HT group (p = 0.38). The HT group had significantly higher KOOS in the pain subscale (less pain) than the BPTB group at the final follow-up (BPTB group 84.2 vs. HT group 94.4; p = 0.02). The BPTB group showed significantly smaller side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity (superior stability) than the HT group (0.3 vs. 2.6 mm; p < 0.01). The percentage of patients with residual anterior knee laxity in the BPTB group was significantly lower than that in the HT group (9.5% vs. 46.7%; odds ratio, 8.3; p = 0.02). STUDY DESIGN: This was a level 3 retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Revision ACLR with a BPTB autograft was associated with superior results regarding restoration of knee joint stability as compared with that with a double-bundle HT autograft, whereas double-bundle HT autograft was superior to BPTB autograft in terms of patient-reported outcomes of pain. The rest of the patient-reported outcomes were equal between the two groups.

Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps, hamstring and patellar tendon autografts leads to similar functional outcomes but hamstring graft has a higher tendency of graft failure.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes, and graft failure in revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT), Hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, 97 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction (40 patients received a QT, 26 an HT and 31 a BPTB graft) met the inclusion criteria. Pre-injury and at 2-year postoperatively patients were evaluated for patient-reported functional outcomes; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level and VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain; and graft failure. Patient-reported outcomes and graft failure were compared between the QT, HT and BPTB groups. The patients with graft failure were not included for outcome analysis at 2-years of follow-up. RESULTS: All three revision groups with QT, HT and BPTB autograft did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, time from injury to surgery, concomitant injuries and single-stage or double-stage procedures (n.s.). No significant difference was found in the pre-injury patient-reported outcome; Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity and VAS for pain (n.s.) between the three groups. At the 2-year follow-up functional outcomes improved in all three groups and all the patients returned to pre-injury activity level; however, no significant difference was found in functional outcomes at the 2-year follow-up between the three groups (n.s.). Graft failure occurred in 4 (10%), 5 (19%) and 3 (10%) patients of QT, HT and BPTB groups, respectively. However, the rate of failure did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: All three autografts (QT, HT and BPTB) demonstrated satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in revision ACL reconstruction. Compared with QT and BPTB grafts, HT graft showed a higher tendency for failure rates. With the increasing incidence of revision ACL reconstruction, surgeons should be aware of all the available graft options. The findings of this study will assist the surgeons in the graft selection for revision ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Long-term results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft with a minimum follow-up of 10 years-a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: A lot of research addresses superiority of the two commonly used autografts bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, without getting to consensus. While there are numerous studies and reviews on short- to mid-term follow-up, not much literature is available on long-term follow-up. As patients suffering ACL injuries are often of young age and high athletic activity, it is crucial to have the best evidence possible for graft choice to minimize consequences, like osteoarthritis later on. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of the online databases, PubMed and Embase, was carried out last on 31st March 2022 for studies comparing BPTB and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts for ACL reconstruction in human patients with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The methodological quality of each study has been evaluated using the modified Coleman Methodology Score. Results on the three variables patient-oriented outcomes, clinical testing and measurements and radiographic outcomes were gathered and are presented in this review. RESULTS: Of 1299 records found, nine studies with a total of 1833 patients were identified and included in this systematic review. The methodological quality of the studies ranged from a Coleman Score of 63-88. Many studies reported no or only few statistically significant differences. Significant results in favour of BPTB were found for activity levels and for instrumented laxity testing with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Better outcomes for HT were found in IKDC-SKF, the KOOS, donor site morbidity, pivot shift test, radiographic osteoarthritis (IKDC C or D) and contralateral ACL rupture. No studies presented significant differences in terms of Lysholm Score or Tegner Activity Score, Lachman test, single-legged hop test, deficits in range of motion, osteoarthritis using the Kellgren and Lawrence classification or graft rupture. CONCLUSION: We cannot recommend one graft to be superior, since both grafts show disadvantages in the long-term follow-up. Considering the limitation of our systematic review of no quantitative analysis, we cannot draw further conclusions from the many insignificant results presented by individual studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.