The Goldilocks Procedure with and without Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Obese Patients: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for complications in breast reconstruction. Thus, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in obese women may be controversial. The authors analyzed obese patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy using Wise-pattern incisions (Goldilocks procedure) and compared outcomes between two groups: Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction and Goldilocks only. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher who underwent the Goldilocks procedure at the Mayo Clinic Health System from 2012 to 2019. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. Minor complications (partial-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, or tissue expander/implant malposition) and major complications (full-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, capsular contracture, tissue expander/implant explantation, or unplanned reoperation or readmission) were compared between groups. Patient-reported outcomes using BREAST-Q questionnaires were also assessed. RESULTS: One hundred five patients (181 breasts) were included. Mean ± SEM age and body mass index were 57.1 ± 10.4 years and 37.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks-only group and 51.5 ± 1.1 years and 35.5 ± 0.4 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group, respectively. Median follow-up time was 15.1 months (interquartile range, 10.0 to 28.6 months). Overall, 96 breasts underwent the Goldilocks-only procedure and 85 Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction. Multivariable analyses revealed a higher rate of minor complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.83; 95 percent CI, 1.22 to 7.02) and major complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.26; 95 percent CI, 1.25 to 4.24) in the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group compared with the Goldilocks-only group, at any given time. Patient satisfaction was not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Goldilocks procedure is a feasible breast reconstructive option in obese patients; however, when it is performed with immediate breast reconstruction, it is associated with higher rates of complications. For patients with a body mass index of 40 kg/m2 or greater, the authors recommend the Goldilocks-only procedure or delayed reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Evaluation of sonographic detectability of different markers within an in vitro simulation model of the axilla.

PURPOSE: Clip-marking of axillary lymph nodes with initial biopsy-confirmed metastasis is required for targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which includes sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and selective localization and removal of the clipped targeted lymph node. There have been several studies which examined the feasibility of TAD in routine clinical use. In this context, the optimal clip visualisation was noted as one of the crucial limiting factors. We, therefore, evaluated the sonographic detectability of 10 different commercially available markers within an in vitro model simulating the anatomical composition of the axilla. METHODS: In this standardised model consisting of porcine fat with 30 mm thickness, the visibility of a total of ten markers was analysed in all 3 planes (parallel, diagonal, orthograde) with wire guidance and then classified into either "visibility good", "visibility moderate" or "visibility poor" with regard to the alignment of the transducer. Additionally, "real-life conditions" were simulated, in which the markers were searched without any wires guidance. RESULTS: It was observed that, while not all markers are detectable in fatty tissue, markers with spherical shape (non-embedded Inconel or Nitinol) or rectangular-shaped Titanium markers with embedded material have a clear advantage. 3D-shaped markers can always be detected in all three axes, which is of particular importance in the axilla with its pyramid shape and fatty tissue. CONCLUSION: The shape and the embedding of the material play a crucial role for visibility and efficacy of the marker, as reliable marking of suspicious and pathological axillary lymph nodes is essential for TAD.

Low-cost, safe, and effective smoke evacuation device for surgical procedures in the COVID-19 age.

BACKGROUND: Smoke is generated by energy-based surgical instruments. The airborne by-products may have potential health implications. METHODS: We developed a simple way to use de conventional surgical evacuator coupled with de electrosurgical pen attached to a 14G bladder catheter for open surgery. It was used in ten prospective patients with breast cancer. RESULTS: We notice a high reduction in surgical smoke during all breast surgery. A questionnaire was used for all participants of the surgery to answer the impression that they had about the device. The subjective impression was that the surgical smoke in contact whit the surgical team was reduced by more than 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical smoke is the gaseous by-product produced by heat-generating devices in various surgical procedures. Surgical smoke may contain chemicals particles, bacteria, and viruses that are harmful and increase the risk of infection for surgeons and all the team in the operation room due to long term exposure of smoke mainly in coronavirus disease 2019 age. The adapted device described is a very simple and cheaper way to use smoke evacuators attached with the monopolar electrosurgical pen to reduce smoke exposure to the surgical team worldwide.

Initial results of a novel technique of clipped node localization in breast cancer patients postneoadjuvant chemotherapy: Skin Mark clipped Axillary nodes Removal Technique (SMART trial).

PURPOSE: Removal of clipped nodes can improve sentinel node biopsy accuracy in breast cancer patients post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, the current methods of clipped node localization have limitations. We evaluated the feasibility of a novel clipped node localization and removal technique by preoperative skin marking of clipped nodes and removal by the Skin Mark clipped Axillary nodes Removal Technique (SMART), with the secondary aim of assessing the ultrasound visibility of the various clips in the axillary nodes after NACT. METHODS: Invasive breast cancer patients with histologically metastatic axillary nodes, going for NACT, and ≤3 sonographically abnormal axillary nodes were recruited. All abnormal nodes had clips inserted. Patients with M1 disease were excluded. Post-NACT, patients underwent SMART and axillary lymph node dissection. Specimen radiography and pathological analyses were performed to confirm the clipped node presence. Success, complication rates of SMART, and ultrasound visibility of the various clips were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-five clipped nodes in 14 patients underwent SMART without complications. The UltraCor Twirl, hydroMARK, UltraClip Dual Trigger, and UltraClip were removed in 13/13 (100%), 7/9 (77.8%), 1/2 (50.0%), and 0/1 (0%), respectively (P = .0103) with UltraCor Twirl having the best ultrasound visibility and removal rate. Removal of three clipped nodes in the same patient (P = .0010) and deeply seated clipped nodes (P = .0167) were associated with SMART failure. CONCLUSION: Skin Mark clipped Axillary nodes Removal Technique is feasible for removing clipped nodes post-NACT, with 100% observed success rate, using the UltraCor Twirl marker in patients with <3 not deeply seated clipped nodes. Larger studies are needed for validation.

[The comparative study of endoscope versus open surgery on nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using prosthesis implantation].

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy between endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediat reconstruction using prosthesis implantation and open surgery. Methods: Totally 189 early-stage breast cancer patients admitted at Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University from January 2013 to December 2017 were enrolled. Among them, 104 patients underwent endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with immediat reconstruction using prosthesis implantation (endoscopic group), with an age of (41.7±6.1) years (range: 25 to 51 years), and 85 patients underwent traditional open surgery (open group), with an age of (41.6±7.7) years (range: 27 to 67 years). The operative duration, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the volume of drainage in 3 days after surgery, postoperative complications and patients' satisfaction of breast reconstruction were compared between the two groups using t test, Mann-Whitney U test, χ(2) test or non-parametric test. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, the rates of recurrence and overall survival between the two groups (P>0.05). The operative duration (sentinel lymph node biopsy: (178± 80) minutes vs. (198±42) minutes, t=-2.082, P=0.039; axillary lymph node dissection: (204±79) minutes vs. (233±49) minutes, t=-2.952, P=0.004), the volume of drainage in three days postoperative ((183±141)ml vs. (237±104) ml, t=- 2.938, P=0.004) in the open group were lower than endoscopic group. The volume of intraoperative blood loss in the endoscopic group was lower than that in the open group ((87±64) ml vs. (62± 36) ml, t=3.210, P=0.002). Patients' satisfaction of breast reconstruction in the endoscopic group was higher than that in the open group. Conclusions: Both endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with immediat reconstruction using prosthesis implantation and open surgery are safe in oncology. Endoscopic surgery maybe more suitable alternative in breast reconstruction for early-stage breast cancer patients.

A novel finite element model-based navigation system-supported workflow for breast tumor excision.

In the case of female breast cancer, a breast-conserving excision is often desirable. This surgery is based on preoperatively gathered MRI, mammography, and sonography images. These images are recorded in multiple patient positions, e. g., 2D mammography images in standing position with a compressed breast and 3D MRI images in prone position. In contrast, the surgery happens in supine or beach chair position. Due to these different perspectives and the flexible, thus challenging, breast tissue, the excision puts high demands on the physician. Therefore, this publication presents a novel eight-step excision support workflow that can be used to include information captured preoperatively through medical imaging based on a finite element (FE) model. In addition, an indoor positioning system is integrated in the workflow in order to track surgical devices and the sonography transducer during surgery. The preoperative part of the navigation system-supported workflow is outlined exemplarily based on first experimental results including 3D scans of a patient in different patient positions and her MRI images. Graphical Abstract Finite Element model based navigation system supported workflow for breast tumor excision is based on eight steps and allows inclusion of information from medical images recorded in multiple patient positions.

Radioactive seed vs wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: A single institution review.

The aim of this study was to compare wire localization (WL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) for nonpalpable breast lesions with regard to margin status, re-excision rate, procedure length, and complications related to localization. A retrospective review of the electronic health records at a single institution was performed. There was no difference in re-excision rate, margin positivity, volume of tissue removed, and complication rate for RSL vs WL (P = 0.9934, P = 0.9934, P = 0.6645, and P = 0.4716 respectively). The only difference was a longer OR time, RSL = 104.408 minutes vs WL = 82.386 minutes. (P = 0.0163). RSL and WL are comparable techniques for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Late Shoulder-Arm Morbidity Using Ultrasound Scalpel in Axillary Dissection for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess whether the use of the harmonic scalpel (HS) in axillary dissection would reduce long-term shoulder-arm morbidity compared to traditional instruments (TIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis on 180 patients who underwent standard axillary dissection for breast cancer between 2007 and 2015 was carried out. All patients were evaluated for postoperative pain, impairment of shoulder-arm mobility, seroma formation in axilla, frozen shoulder, and lymphedema. RESULTS: HS procedure on average was 50% shorter compared to the TI technique. HS reduced by 4.5 times the risk of axillary seroma. TIs were associated with 4 times higher risk of developing a painful frozen shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the HS was associated with reduced costs and a positive long-term effect on shoulder-arm morbidity. Axillary seromas are not the only reason of later postoperative shoulder-arm morbidity: other mechanisms are hypothesized in the onset of this very disabling disorder.

Evaluation of Acellular Dermal Matrix Efficacy in Prosthesis-Based Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although many studies have examined the safety of acellular dermal matrix in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction, few studies have evaluated efficacy. This study examined initial tissue expander fill volume as a marker of efficacy, comparing patients after staged prosthetic breast reconstruction assisted with acellular dermal matrix versus breast reconstruction not assisted with acellular dermal matrix. Number of fill visits and time interval to implant exchange were examined as secondary endpoints. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was conducted to identify consecutive staged prosthetic reconstruction cases over 12 years. RESULTS: Mean initial tissue expander fill volume was significantly higher in the acellular dermal matrix group compared with the non-acellular dermal matrix group (180.8 ± 150.0 versus 45.8 ± 74.4; p = 0.00). Normalizing for final implant size, the acellular dermal matrix group exhibited significantly higher perioperative fill (0.33 ± 0.24 versus 0.11 ± 0.16; p = 0.00). A collinear trend was observed between acellular dermal matrix use and direct-to-implant reconstruction procedures during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that acellular dermal matrix use is more efficacious in achieving greater initial fill volume, fewer visits for expansion, and a shorter time interval to implant exchange compared with non-acellular dermal matrix procedures. The authors also describe a collinear relationship between acellular dermal matrix use and transition to direct-to-implant procedures at their institution. This work serves as a framework for future studies evaluating acellular dermal matrix efficacy, and guides innovation of biomaterials to support breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Breast Lesion Excision System in the diagnosis and treatment of intraductal papillomas - A feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of Breast Lesion Excision System (BLES) in the treatment of intraductal papillomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with a needle biopsy -based suspicion of an intraductal papilloma who consequently underwent a BLES procedure at Helsinki University Hospital between 2011 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study. The purpose of the BLES procedure was either to excise the entire lesion or in few cases to achieve better sampling. RESULTS: In total, 74 patients underwent 80 BLES procedures. Pathological diagnosis after the BLES biopsy confirmed an intraductal papilloma without atypia in 43 lesions, whereas 10 lesions were upgraded to high-risk lesions (HRL) with either atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ. Five cases were upgraded to malignancy, two were invasive ductal carcinomas and three were ductal carcinoma in situ. Additionally, 18 lesions were diagnosed as other benign lesions. Four procedures failed. Complete excision with BLES was achieved in 19 out of 43 intraductal papillomas, 6 out of 10 HRL and two out of five malignant lesions. No major complications occurred. The BLES procedure was adequate in the management of the 71 breast lesions. CONCLUSION: The BLES procedure is an acceptable method for the management of small benign and high-risk breast lesions such as intraductal papillomas in selected patients. Thus, a great amount of diagnostic surgical biopsies can be avoided.

Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Prepectoral and Partial Subpectoral Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic breast reconstruction with prepectoral placement may confer clinical advantages compared with subpectoral placement. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare clinical outcomes following 2-stage reconstruction following prepectoral and partial subpectoral placement of tissue expanders and implants. METHODS: A retrospective review of 39 (prepectoral) and 50 (partial subpectoral) patients was completed. Acellular dermal matrix was used in all patients. Mean age was 50.4 and 49.2 years, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) > 30 was noted in 15.4% of prepectoral and 18% of partial subpectoral patients. Radiation therapy was delivered to 38.5% of prepectoral patients and to 22% of partial subpectoral patients. Mean follow-up was 8.7 and 13 months for the prepectoral cohort and partial subpectoral cohorts. RESULTS: The percentage of patients having at least 1 adverse event was 20.5% in the prepectoral and 22% in the partial subpectoral cohorts. The incidence of surgical-site infection and seroma was 8.1% and 4.8%, respectively, for the prepectoral cohort and 4.8% and 2.4%, respectively, for the partial subpectoral cohorts. Device explantation was 6.5% for the prepectoral and 7.2% for the partial subpectoral patients. Explantation did not occur in patients who had radiation or who had a BMI > 30. Four patients (6 breasts-7.2%) required conversion from partial subpectoral to prepectoral because of animation deformity. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral reconstruction is a viable alternative to partial subpectoral reconstruction. Proper patient selection is an important variable. Prepectoral reconstruction can be safely performed in patients with a BMI < 40 and in patients having postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: The Breast Surgeon's Perspective.

Prepectoral breast reconstruction has been reemerging as a technique for postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction. Due to its advantage in eliminating animation deformity, shortening length of hospital stay and decreasing the amount of narcotics used for pain control, the technique has been embraced by patients and surgeons alike. The authors examined the breast surgeon's perspective regarding prepectoral reconstruction taking into consideration oncologic criteria, breast cancer recurrence, surgical technique, and the team approach to patient care.

Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix has gained widespread acceptance in immediate expander/implant reconstruction because of perceived benefits, including improved expansion dynamics and superior aesthetic results. Although previous investigators have evaluated its risks, few studies have assessed the impact of acellular dermal matrix on other outcomes, including patient-reported measures. METHODS: The Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study used a prospective cohort design to evaluate patients undergoing postmastectomy reconstruction from 10 centers and 58 participating surgeons between 2012 and 2015. The analysis focused on women undergoing immediate tissue expander reconstruction following mastectomies for cancer treatment or prophylaxis. Medical records and patient-reported outcome data, using the BREAST-Q and Numeric Pain Rating Scale instruments, were reviewed. Bivariate analyses and mixed-effects regression models were applied. RESULTS: A total of 1297 patients were evaluated, including 655 (50.5 percent) with acellular dermal matrix and 642 (49.5 percent) without acellular dermal matrix. Controlling for demographic and clinical covariates, no significant differences were seen between acellular dermal matrix and non-acellular dermal matrix cohorts in overall complications (OR, 1.21; p = 0.263), major complications (OR, 1.43; p = 0.052), wound infections (OR, 1.49; p = 0.118), or reconstructive failures (OR, 1.55; p = 0.089) at 2 years after reconstruction. There were also no significant differences between the cohorts in the time to expander/implant exchange (p = 0.78). No significant differences were observed in patient-reported outcome scores, including satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, physical well-being, and postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, prospective analysis, the authors found no significant acellular dermal matrix effects on complications, time to exchange, or patient-reported outcome in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction. Further studies are needed to develop criteria for more selective use of acellular dermal matrix in these patients. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Mastectomy technique using a self-designed self-retaining retractor system.

Mastectomy is one of the most common procedures for treating breast cancer. It is often performed by a breast surgeon with an assistant holding the retractor to provide adequate tension for dissection of the skin flap. However, the technique is highly dependent on the retraction from the assistant. We herein describe a novel technique using a self-retained retractor system with a specially designed retractor ring and elastic stay hooks to allow adequate and constant tension of retraction throughout the entire mastectomy procedure. This new technique was introduced at our breast center in 2008, and the skin flap necrosis rate and time required for skin flap dissection remain comparable to those in other regions. The retractor ring costs less than $200 USD, and the disposable elastic hooks cost around $50 USD. In conclusion, this new technique is simple, versatile, and effective.

A Randomized Prospective Comparison of Patient-Assessed Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes with Radioactive Seed Localization versus Wire Localization.

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) has emerged as an alternative to wire localization (WL) in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer. Few studies have prospectively evaluated patient satisfaction and outcomes with RSL. We report the results of a randomized trial comparing RSL to WL in our community hospital. We prospectively enrolled 135 patients with nonpalpable breast cancer between 2011 and 2014. Patients were randomized to RSL or WL. Patients rated the pain and the convenience of the localization on a 5-point Likert scale. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Of 135 patients enrolled, 10 were excluded (benign pathology, palpable cancer, mastectomy, and previous ipsilateral cancer) resulting in 125 patients. Seventy patients (56%) were randomized to RSL and 55 (44%) to WL. Fewer patients in the RSL group reported moderate to severe pain during the localization procedure compared to the WL group (12% versus 26%, respectively, p = 0.058). The overall convenience of the procedure was rated as very good to excellent in 85% of RSL patients compared to 44% of WL patients (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the volume of the main specimen (p = 0.67), volume of the first surgery (p = 0.67), or rate of positive margins (p = 0.53) between groups. RSL resulted in less severe pain and higher convenience compared to WL, with comparable excision volume and positive margin rates. High patient satisfaction with RSL provides another incentive for surgeons to strongly consider RSL as an alternative to WL.

Comparison of postoperative pain in diathermy and conventional scalpel Skin incision after mastectomy in Ibadan, Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: Pain control is a challenge after surgery. Inadequate control of acute postoperative pain in mastectomy patients may lead to chronic post mastectomy pain syndrome. The study aimed to compare the effect of diathermy incision with scalpel incision on the severity of acute postoperative pain after mastectomy. METHOD: Sixty three females had mastectomy under general anaesthesia. Thirty two patients had skin incisions made with scalpel while 31 patients with diathermy. Both groups received intraoperative Fentanyl and Tramadol. Tramadol was also employed as postoperative analgesic while Paracetamol was given as the rescue analgesic. The outcome measures were pain scores using visual analogue score (VAS) and analgesic consumption within the twenty four hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean VAS in the diathermy group versus scalpel group at 6th, 12, 18th and 24th hour post operatively were 11.84 +/- 6.15 mm versus 16.18 +/- 8.5 mm (p=0.001), 11.10 +/- 4.26 mm versus 15.84 +/- 5.12 mm (p=0.001), 11.07 +/- 4.15 mm versus 17.32 +/- 6.01 mm (p=0.001), 10.6 +/- 8.08 mm versus 19.19 +/- 8.7 mm (p = 0.001) respectively. The mean dose of Tramadol was 264 +/- 84 mg in the diathermy group versus 278 +/- 64 mg in the scalpel group p=0.189, three patients required rescue analgesic (paracetamol) in the diathermy group mean dose 1.5.7 +/- 0.54 g versus 7 patients in the scalpel group, mean dose 1.67 +/- 0.58 g p=0.75. CONCLUSION: Diathermy can contribute to reduction in the acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing mastectomy.