Analytical method development and comparability study for AmBisome® and generic Amphotericin B liposomal products.

Liposomal Amphotericin B, known as AmBisome®, is a life-saving antifungal product that sold $407 million in 2019. AmBisome® has a rather complex physical structure in that Amphotericin B (AmpB) forms a stable ionic complex with the lipid bilayer to maintain AmBisome®'s low toxicity and high stability in systemic circulation. Failed attempts to reproduce AmBisome®'s precise structure has resulted in faster drug release and higher toxicity both in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we established several analytical methodologies to quantify liposomal AmpB components, characterize thermal properties of the liposome, and determine particle size distribution, AmpB aggregation state, and drug release kinetics. We applied these methodologies together with in vitro hemolytic potential and antifungal activity tests to characterize multiple lots of AmBisome® and two generic products approved in India, Phosome® and Amphonex®. We also used Fungizone®, a micellar AmpB formulation, and "leaky" AmpB liposomes as negative controls. Our results showed that Phosome® and Amphonex® were both similar to AmBisome®, while Fungizone® and 'leaky" liposomes exhibited differences in both thermal properties and AmpB aggregation state, leading to faster drug release and higher toxicity. Due to the increased interest of the pharmaceutical industry in making generic AmBisome® and the lack of standard analytical methods to characterize liposomal AmpB products, the methodologies described here are valuable for the development of generic liposomal AmpB products.

Comparative analysis of docetaxel: physical and chemical characterisation of Taxotère® and generics.

Several cases of fatal enterocolitis have been described in association with the use of docetaxel (DTX), and this increase in adverse events has been concomitant with a change in formulation. Indeed in 2010, a new DTX-based presentation has been introduced in the form of a single ready-to-use vial by Sanofi-Aventis, presentation also used for generics. In this study, different available formulations were compared (Sanofi 2 vials, Sanofi 1 vial, Accord Healthcare, Kabi, Hospira) in terms of composition compliance with control specifications and simulated micelle behaviour to try to determine what could be the potential causes of this problem. This work had permitted to show that all the tested products complied with specifications in terms of dosage and purity. Variations in the composition of polysorbate 80 (PS80) have been observed but are probably too small to be responsible for the toxicity found in patients. However, we identified a difference in micelle size and release kinetics probably because of doubling concentration of ethanol in new formulation. As a result, we emphasised the importance in the case of DTX of conducting bioequivalence studies as expected in European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance to ensure patient safety, even though these formulation changes might seem minor. Therefore, further studies are needed to explore the potential role of ethanol, PS80 and the unbound fraction of DTX in the development of enterocolitis in patients treated with DTX.

[Valsartan contamination]. / Vervuiling van valsartan.

In early July 2018, it became known that a number of generic preparations containing the active substance valsartan could be carcinogenic. This news took caregivers and patients by surprise. Initially, a recall was initiated at the pharmacy level. A few weeks later, the recall was expanded to the patient level. The source of the contamination was a factory of the Chinese company Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical, where the active ingredient valsartan is produced. It was found that batches from that factory had contained too high a concentration of N-nitrosodimethylamine since as early as 2012. The EMA estimates that if 5000 patients took the maximum dose of 320 mg of tainted valsartan tablets every day in the period from July 2012 to July 2018, there will be one extra case of cancer. The valsartan contamination raises the question of whether or not the Dutch authorities involved responded adequately. It has become clear from the contamination of valsartan that good and timely communication is important.

Generic oncology drugs: are they all safe?

Although the availability of generic oncology drugs allows access to contemporary care and reduces costs, there is international variability in the safety of this class of drugs. In this Series paper, we review clinical, policy, safety, and regulatory considerations for generic oncology drugs focusing on the USA, Canada, the European Union (EU), Japan, China, and India. Safety information about generic formulations is reviewed from one agent in each class, for heavy metal drugs (cisplatin), targeted agents (imatinib), and cytotoxic agents (docetaxel). We also review regulatory reports from Japan and the USA, countries with the largest pharmaceutical expenditures. Empirical studies did not identify safety concerns in the USA, Canada, the EU, and Japan, where regulations and enforcement are strong. Although manufacturing problems for generic pharmaceuticals exist in India, where 40% of all generic pharmaceuticals used in the USA are manufactured, increased inspections and communication by the US Food and Drug Administration are occurring, facilitating oversight and enforcement. No safety outbreaks among generic oncology drugs were reported in developed countries. For developing countries, oversight is less intensive, and concerns around drug safety still exist. Regulatory agencies should collaboratively develop procedures to monitor the production, shipment, storage, and post-marketing safety of generic oncology drugs. Regulatory agencies for each country should also aim towards identical definitions of bioequivalence, the cornerstone of regulatory approval.

A toxicity assessment of 30 pharmaceuticals using Aliivibrio fischeri: a comparison of the acute effects of different formulations.

Considerable quantities of different classes of drugs are consumed annually worldwide. These drugs, once disposed, often remain stable, even after conventional or advanced treatments. Although there have been a number of studies on the potential harm caused by drugs when released into the environment, few studies have investigated the toxicity of pharmaceutical excipients. In the present study, the acute toxicity of 30 drugs was tested to Aliivibrio fischeri. Ten different active ingredients were investigated, each in three distinct formulations: generic, similar and reference (brand drug). The aim of the study was to evaluate the harmful potential of drugs frequently sold in drugstores and to assess the contribution of excipients towards the observed acute toxicity. Within the 10 drugs evaluated, only one, dexchlorpheniramine maleate, was not toxic in any formulation. The toxicities of the three formulations were often different, even though the active ingredient has been the same. For some drugs, such as diazepam, glibenclamide, metformin, nimesulide, hydrochlorothiazide and simvastatin, only one or two of the three formulations tested were toxic to A. fischeri. These results highlight the toxicological potential of drug excipients, but not exclusively the toxicity of the active ingredients.

Is sunitinib a Narrow Therapeutic Index Drug? - A systematic review and in vitro toxicology-analysis of Sunitinib vs. Imatinib in cells from different tissues.

Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs (NTIDs) are characterized by a small range between therapeutic and toxicological effect. Missing international harmonized definition for NTIDs the EMA does not even have a definition of NTIDs in contrast to the U.S. FDA, Health Canada, and the Japanese NIHS. Sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), indicated for the treatment of certain cancer types, will be running off-patent soon. Falling into the category of NTID would have a major impact on regulatory requirements for generic applications. Our analyses of metadata revealed numerous arguments in favor of a NTID designation. We used in vitro experiments to also give initial experimental answers. Five cell types of different tissue origin were examined for determination of IC50-values in cell viability assays. For comparison, the first-in-class TKI Imatinib was used as reference non-NTID drug. In addition, apoptotic proteins were investigated with respect to their expression and phosphorylation status. These in vitro experiments showed systematically higher toxicity of Sunitinib compared to Imatinib and a different expression and phosphorylation pattern of apoptotic proteins. In vitro data can only give preliminary results and further experiments with clinical blood samples and tumor biopsies are needed to finally clarify NTID status of Sunitinib.

Biodistribution and predictive hepatic gene expression of intravenous iron sucrose.

INTRODUCTION: We have examined iron biodistribution and hepatic gene expression in rats following administration of the generic Iron Sucrose Azad (ISA) or the reference iron sucrose drug Venofer®. METHODS: ISA and Venofer® were administered intravenously to normal, non-anemic, male rats at 15 mg/kg (a supra-therapeutic dose-level). To evaluate biodistribution, tissue iron levels were determined over 28 days for plasma, liver, spleen, bone marrow, heart, kidney, lung and stomach using a validated ICP-MS method. Hepatic gene expression was evaluated by microarray analysis of mRNA from samples taken 24 h after drug administration. RESULTS: Iron concentration/time profiles for plasma and tissues were quantitatively similar for ISA and Venofer. Following administration, circulating iron levels briefly exceeded transferrin binding capacity and there was a transient increase in hepatic iron. Bone marrow iron levels remained elevated throughout the study. No increases in tissue iron levels were observed in the heart, stomach or lungs. Spleen iron levels increased over the course of the study in treated and control rats. Small, transient increases were recorded in the kidneys of treated rats. The effects of ISA and Venofer® on hepatic gene transcription were similar. Principal components analysis showed that there was no systematic effect of either treatment on transcriptional profiles. Only a small number of genes showed significant modulation of expression. No transcriptional pattern matches with toxicity pathways were found in the ToxFX database for either treatment. No modulation of key genes in apoptosis, inflammation or oxidative stress pathways was detected. DISCUSSION: These findings demonstrated that the biodistribution of administered iron is essentially similar for Iron Sucrose Azad and Venofer®, that iron sucrose partitions predominantly into the liver, spleen and bone marrow, and that hepatic gene expression studies did not provide any evidence of toxicity in animals treated at a supra-therapeutic dose-level.

Renal toxicity caused by brand-name versus generic cisplatin: a comparative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A generic cisplatin formulation has replaced the brand-name formulation since November 2003 in our hospital. We retrospectively assessed the renal toxicity caused by the brand-name and generic cisplatin formulations. METHODS: The medical records of patients with thoracic malignancy who were treated at our hospital between November 2000 and April 2008 were reviewed. In total, 1296 eligible patients received 80 mg/m(2) of cisplatin: 499 patients were treated with the brand-name cisplatin formulation before November 2003 (Group 1) and 797 patients were treated with the generic formulation after November 2003 (Group 2). We compared the maximum serum creatinine level after chemotherapy in the two groups. RESULTS: The patient characteristics, including age, sex and performance status, and pretreatment serum creatinine levels were well balanced between the two groups. More patients received four cycles of chemotherapy in Group 2 (P < 0.0001). The median (range) of the maximum serum creatinine levels during all the chemotherapy cycles were 1.1 (0.5-4.1) mg/dl and 1.1 (0.5-4.4) mg/dl in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.0237). The incidence of grade 0 serum creatinine elevations decreased from 47% to 39%, while that of grade 1 serum creatinine elevations increased from 32% to 41% (P = 0.0094). The incidence rates of grade 2 or 3 serum creatinine elevations were similar (21 vs. 20%). The time to serum creatinine elevation was also similar in Groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.161). CONCLUSION: Although grade 1 maximum serum creatinine level was more common in the generic cisplatin formulation group, this was attributed to the larger number of patients receiving four cycles of chemotherapy in this group.

Characterising vancomycin's immunotoxic profile using Swiss and CFW mice as an experimental model.

Immunotoxicology can lead to determining the adverse effects of different compounds on the immune system. Sometimes, many drugs (especially antibiotics) induce immune alterations, mainly auto-immunity. This study was aimed at determining vancomycin's immunotoxic effect by comparing the original molecule to two of the most used copies. Thirty-two mice from two murine strains (Swiss and CFW) were treated with three antibiotic formulations for studying its effect on splenic lymphoid and peripheral blood cell populations by using haemograms, flow cytometry and blastogenesis assays. The results indicated that vancomycin produces neutropenia and lymphocytosis in peripheral populations and that it induces a selective immunomodulatory effect on splenocyte sub-populations, depending on formulation and the strain so treated.

Decreased renal accumulation and toxicity of a new VCM formulation in rats with chronic renal failure.

We previously reported that MEEK, a generic product of vancomycin hydrochloride (VCM), was less nephrotoxic than a conventional preparation (S-VCM) in normal rats at a nephrotoxic dose (400 mg/kg) of VCM.(1)) To infer the clinical significance of this finding, we compared the risk of nephrotoxicity of these two formulations in rats with chronic renal failure in this study. MEEK or S-VCM was given intravenously to two weeks post-5/6 nephrectomy rats, and the pharmacokinetic profile of VCM and pathological evaluation were compared. There were no differences at the daily clinical dose (40 mg/kg), but at the twice the daily clinical dose (80 mg/kg), the mean plasma concentration of VCM was higher after S-VCM administration than after MEEK and the CL(tot) and CL(r) decreased to approximately 60% of those after MEEK. The renal tissue concentration of VCM was 1.5-fold higher at 24hr after S-VCM administration than after MEEK. Pathologically, no marked differences between the findings were observed at 24hr after administration of each formulation. These findings suggest that MEEK reduces renal damage caused by VCM and prevents the iatrogenic aggravation of nephrotoxicity. These results hold out hope that MEEK will permit high-dose administration of VCM, while revealing clinical significance of the nephrotoxicity-reduction by MEEK.

Comparative in vitro study of oesophageal adhesiveness of different commercial formulations containing alendronate.

Cases of oesophageal irritation have been reported in patients ingesting alendronate with little liquid or reclining shortly after taking the medication. Pill-induced oesophagitis principally occurs because of adherence of ingested tablets to the epithelial surface. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the oesophageal bioadhesive characteristics of alendronate generics marketed in Europe, the proprietary Fosamax((R)), one negative and two positive polymer controls. A texture analyser was used for qualitative analysis and to determine the maximal detachment force and the adhesion work developed by each formulation on porcine oesophageal mucosa. Fosamax showed few or no bioadhesive characteristics, but the detachment of few tablets powder particles in some of the experiments does not preclude the potential risk of oesophageal lesions. The 10-mg generic Teva tablets had bioadhesive characteristics similar to a positive control. Other generic formulations (Alenat, Stada, Aliud, Ratiopharm showed "cleavage" rupture, leaving a large piece of the tablet mass attached to the mucosa. The bioadhesive characteristics seem to be related to the inactive ingredients: the presence of adhesive polymers such as HPC or very active disintegration agents, such as sodium croscarmellose. The demonstrated differences in adhesiveness suggest that differences in oesophageal tolerance between Fosamax tablets and generics of sodium alendronate may exist.