[System-immanent incentives in the remuneration for psychiatry and psychosomatics : Analysis exemplified by treatment of alcohol-related disorders]. / Systemimmanente Anreize im PEPP : Analyse am Beispiel der Behandlung alkoholbezogener Störungen.

BACKGROUND: The German fixed rate remuneration system in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) has been criticized by many specialty associations because negative effects on mental healthcare are expected through economic incentives. OBJECTIVE: Through analysis of performance data in the treatment of alcohol dependency at the Evangelical Hospital Bielefeld (Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld, EvKB) from 2014 and various simulations, the incentives of the PEPP (version 2015) were analyzed and its potential impact on patient care was evaluated. METHODS: Groups of cases were created based on the clinical data. Various parameters were evaluated, such as duration of treatment, PEPP coding, loss of income by merging cases and case remuneration. Additionally, changes in the duration of treatment, the intensity of treatment and the intensity of care were simulated. RESULTS: In the simulations a reduction in the duration of treatment by 16.1 % led to additional revenues of 1.9 % per treatment day. The calculated additional costs of 1:1 care and intensive nursing care were not completely covered by the additional revenues, whereas psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment programs showed positive profit contributions. Complicated cases with increased merging of cases showed lower revenues but with above average expenditure of efforts. CONCLUSION: The current version of the PEPP leads to misdirected incentives in patient care. This is caused, for example, by the fact that higher profit contributions can be realized in some patient groups and intensive nursing care of patients is insufficiently represented. It is not clear whether these incentives will persist or can be compensated in subsequent versions of the system.

[Analysis and Assessment of Modifications of the PEPP System Introduced by the PEPP Catalogue 2015]. / Analyse und Beurteilung der Veränderungen des PEPP-Systems durch den Entgeltkatalog 2015.

PURPOSE: In 2015 the remuneration system for psychiatric and psychosomatic stationary treatments will be revised. The remuneration for a case is calculated by the product of base rate, a cost weight and the number of days of treatment. The cost weight varies depending on the number of days of treatment. This paper surveys the incentives, the casemix structure and the consistency of the modified PEPP system. METHODS: Under the assumption of a profit-maximising supplier it is possible to define the economically optimal length of stay by comparing marginal revenues and marginal costs. Therefore a revenue function is derived from the new structure of the PEPP system. Since the determination of the marginal revenues is not mathematically possible, the revenues per additional day of treatment are calculated. On that basis it is possible to determine the economically optimal length of stay and to assess the consistency of the system changes. RESULTS: In an early stage of treatment the revenues per additional day of treatment are degressive. After a defined amount of days these additional revenues stay constant, which will be relevant for the majority of the cases. It is economically optimal for the hospitals to treat patients as long as possible, if the marginal costs lie or sink below these constant revenues per additional day of treatment. Furthermore the system changes result in a more complex casemix structure and the calculation of the cost weights is partially inconsistent, since the marginal revenues do not monotonically decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The modifications lead to a reduction of degressive elements in the PEPP system, which might also be accompanied by a decrease of economically induced pressure on length of stay. The inconsistent calculation of the cost weights and the more complicated casemix structure can be viewed critically.

[Normative-empirical determination of personnel requirements in psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy]. / Normativ-empirische Bestimmung des Personalbedarfs in der Psychosomatischen Medizin und Psychotherapie.

OBJECTIVES: There is a high degree of misallocated medical care for patients with somatoform disorders and patients with concomitant mental diseases. This complex of problems could be reduced remarkably by integrating psychosomatic departments into hospitals with maximum medical care. Admitting a few big psychosomatic specialist clinics into the calculation basis decreased the Day-Mix Index (DMI). The massive reduction of the calculated costs per day leads to a gap in funding resulting in a loss of the necessary personnel requirements - at least in university psychosomatic departments. The objective of this article is therefore to empirically verify the reference numbers of personnel resources calculated on the basis of the new German lump-sum reimbursement system in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP). METHODS: The minute values of the reference numbers of Heuft (1999) are contrasted with the minute values of the PEPP reimbursement system in the years 2013 and 2014, as calculated by the Institute for Payment Systems in Hospitals (InEK). RESULTS: The minute values derived from the PEPP data show a remarkable convergence with the minute values of Heuft's reference numbers (1999). CONCLUSIONS: A pure pricing system like the PEPP reimbursement system as designed so far threatens empirically verifiable and qualified personnel requirements of psychosomatic departments. In order to ensure the necessary therapy dosage and display it in minute values according to the valid OPS procedure codes, the minimum limit of the reference numbers is mandatory to maintain the substance of psychosomatic care. Based on the present calculation, a base rate of at least 285 e has to be politically demanded. Future developments in personnel costs have to be refinanced at 100 %.

[Concept of budget-based remuneration system for the fields of psychiatry and psychotherapy, psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy, child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy]. / Konzept eines budgetbasierten Entgeltsystems für die Fachgebiete Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie.

A new remuneration system is currently being developed for the hospital care of people with mental disorders. Last year, because of sharp criticism the option phase of the planned Flat-rate Charges in Psychiatry and Psychosomatics (Pauschalierende Entgelte Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik, PEPP) was extended by 2 years. During this time the Federal Ministry of Health wants to look for alternatives and possible starting points for the further development of care. Now, 16 scientific professional associations and organisations have presented a joint concept for a sustainable solution: the budget-based remuneration system. The system is suitable for ensuring that people with mental disorders are treated according to their particular needs and for promoting the appropriate further development of regional care in all treatment settings. It corresponds with the objectives as formulated in Section 17d of the Hospital Finance Act (Krankenhausfinanzierungsgesetz, KHG) and translates the PEPP system, which is currently being developed and focusses on average prices, into a performance-oriented, transparent budgetary system. The fundamental principle is the separation of the individual hospitals' budgeting on the basis of evidence-based, feature- and performance-related modules and billing in the form of advance payments from the agreed budget.

[Introduction of performance- and day-based lump-sum remuneration for stationary psychiatric and psychosomatic treatments in Germany--analysis of incentives of the PEPP system]. / Leistungs- und tagesbezogene pauschale Vergütung in der stationären psychiatrischen und psychosomatischen Versorgung - Eine Analyse der Anreizwirkungen des PEPP-Systems.

PURPOSE: This paper surveys the effects of day-based lump-sum remuneration as defined by the PEPP system on the patients' length of stay and compares its incentives to the mechanisms of the German DRG system and the former remunera-tion system for stationary psychiatric and psychosomatic treatments. METHODS: The analysis identifies the economically optimal length of stay defined as the profit maximising duration of treatment by comparing marginal revenues and marginal costs. Since it is economically optimal to extend the treatment until the marginal costs exceed the marginal revenues, psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities are incentivised to minimise the time gap between average duration of treatment as expected duration of treatment and the economically optimal length of stay. RESULTS: Compared to the German DRG system, which provides a strong incentive to reduce length of stay, the incentives set by the PEPP system imply either a reduction or an extension of treatment duration depending on the underlying cost function. If a degressive cost function is assumed, which is typical for treatments of psychiatric and psychosomatic illnesses, the economically optimal duration of treatment will be at the last upper boundary of the interval of the marginal revenue function in which the average marginal revenues exceed the average marginal costs. It is also feasible that it is economically optimal to treat the patient for as long as possible. The hospital is incentivised to extend or reduce the time of treatment to this point in time. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals are able to increase their profits by reducing or extending time of treatment. Therefore these facilities have to justify the extent of treatment to the health insurance companies. Since the incentives of the PEPP system and the DRG system diverge, the results of research on supply induced demand in the DRG system cannot be transferred to the discussion about the effects of the introduction of the PEPP system. As long as the average duration of treatment as expected duration of treatment deviates from the economically optimal length of stay, policy makers should consider the options of adaptations, i. e., increase of time intervals or calculating cost weights based on variable costs combined with separate remuneration of fixed costs. The TEPP system and PEPPplus are already being discussed as adaptions or additions.

[The new payment system in psychiatry - do elderly people belong to the losers? An analysis on the basis of the VIPP1 data base]. / Das neue Entgeltsystem in der Psychiatrie - gehören ältere Patienten zu den Verlierern? Eine Analyse auf der Grundlage der VIPP-Datenbank.

The development of the lump-sum reimbursement System in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) (Klimke et al., 2014) is being negatively considered - also in gerontopsychiatry.Thus it is reasonable to make a timely analysis of the effects of PEPP on health-care structures. For this two analyses have been carried out. On the one hand the day mix index of elderly patients (> 64 years) was compared with that of younger ones (> 17 years, < 65 years). On the other hand younger and older were included in the analysis with regard to the available treatment minutes in exact daily classifications according to the PsychPV. It is seen that evaluation of the individual day was markedly higher for gerontopsychiatric patients not only in inpatient (difference > 0.1) but also in outpatient (difference > 0.07) setting. The exact daily classifications according to PsychPV, however, were markedly poorer for the elderly patients. Thus, on the basis of routine data of VIPP projects, a clear change can be seen in favour of the elderly patient under PEPP conditions as compared to financing according to PsychPV. However, concern remains that the ageing population and modernisation of therapy are not being sufficiently taken into account. The new reimbursement system merely regulates the distribution of available resources; if these resources are too low nothing will change by the PEPP-System.

[Reimbursement in psychiatry and psychosomatics: proof of concept for a system based on daily costs]. / Vergütungssystem für Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik: Studie zur Machbarkeit eines tageskostenbasierten Entgeltsystems.

BACKGROUND: In Germany a new reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics is under development. Based on total costs of each case from selected hospitals and day clinics, in 2013 the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) proposed to reimburse the hospital costs daily with step-wise decreasing remuneration, mainly depending on the ICD-10 diagnosis, duration of stay and some complicating factors (PEPP grouper). It is controversial whether this degressive system will result in an inadequate remuneration of patients with longer duration of severe symptoms, such as suicidality in depression or autoaggressive behavior in borderline personality disorder and will eventually lead to advantages for acutely ill patients with short duration of stay compared to chronically ill patients. OBJECTIVES: This study formulated and tested an alternative remuneration system (proof of concept) mainly based on an analysis of daily cost data instead of the total costs of each case. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is based on 147,749 treatment days from 4,633 cases of patients with psychotic disorders (PEPP-PA03) in 6 hospitals. As possible cost separating factors the study analyzed days with and without intensive psychiatric care, 1 to 1 care, psychological diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acute crisis intervention, age at admission, the first days of treatment and day of discharge. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Nearly all factors tested were shown to be statistically significant in separating daily hospital costs. Based on these findings an alternative calculation algorithm (TEPPconcret), which grouped the cases with respect to age, intensive care, 1 to 1 care, treatment days 1-4 and day of discharge, was formulated and tested. For psychotic disorders TEPPconcret with a basic rate complemented by daily add-on payments depending on the effort involved, is a serious alternative to the PEPP system and awaits further evaluation.

[The new reimbursement for psychiatry and psychosomatics - challenges, opportunities and risks of the new financing system]. / Das neue Entgeltsystem für Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik - Herausforderungen, Chancen und Risiken einer neuen Leistungsvergütung.

With the implementation of §â€Š17 d KHG which provides for the introduction of a new, much more performance-based and transparent reimbursement system for psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals, the Federal Ministry of Health sends the psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities in Germany into a previously unexplored area. Since 2013, there is the possibility of voluntary participation in the new system. Valid from 2015, every other institution will have to deal with the new challenges, opportunities and risks coming along with the structural changes, even though this fact will not have any impact on the individual hospital revenue budget until the end of 2016. There is still some time left to get used to the new system. This paper summarises the key data on the new reimbursement system and explains its content as well as how it works. In addition to that this paper goes into the classification system and clarifies what is essential for a solid preparation. Finally, it comments on the most common criticisms emerging since 2009. How the new system will develop remains to be seen. The fact that it will evolve seems to be certain in terms of a "learning system". It is up to all parties to promote the learning process so as to make effective use of existing potential and keep risks to a minimum.

[Is there adequate care for patients with psychosomatic disorders in Austria? Analysis of the need and a proposal for a model of quality assurance in Austrian psychosomatic medicine]. / Werden in Osterreich Patienten mit psychosomatischen Storungen ausreichend versorgt? Eine Bedarfserhebung mit Losungsvorschlag zur Qualitats-sicherung fur die Psychosomatische Medizin in Osterreich.

INTRODUCTION: Quality assurance in psychosomatic medicine in Austria is currently based on a voluntary continuing medical education programme in psychosocial, psychosomatic and psychotherapeutic medicine. It is questionable whether psychosomatic care can be sufficiently provided in this manner. In addition, a broadly based proposal to create a subspecialty in psychosomatic medicine in order to facilitate quality assurance, is investigated. METHODS: The necessity to reorganize psychosomatic care was explored through semi-structured qualitative interviews with experts. Data-based analyses probed the labour market of the proposed subspecialty, and the literature was reviewed to look into the cost-benefit ratio of psychosomatic treatment. RESULTS: All experts expressed a need to restructure psychosomatic care in Austria. Examples exist for psychosomatic treatment with an efficient cost-benefit relation in diverse medical settings. CONCLUSION: Establishing a subspecialty in Psychosomatic Medicine seems feasible and could contribute to increased quality assurance and the nationwide provision of psychosomatic care.

Introduction of DRG-based reimbursement in inpatient psychosomatics--an examination of cost homogeneity and cost predictors in the treatment of patients with eating disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Various western countries are focusing on the introduction of reimbursement based on diagnosis-related groups (DRG) in inpatient mental health. The aim of this study was to analyze if psychosomatic inpatients treated for eating disorders could be reimbursed by a common per diem rate. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for patient selection (n=256) were (1) a main diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN) or eating disorder-related obesity (OB), (2) minimum length of hospital stay of 2 days, (3) and treatment at Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany during the years 2006-2009. Cost calculation was executed from the hospital's perspective, mainly using micro-costing. Generalized linear models with Gamma error distribution and log link function were estimated with per diem costs as dependent variable, clinical and patient variables as well as treatment year as independent variables. RESULTS: Mean costs/case for AN amounted to 5,251€, 95% CI [4407-6095], for BN to 3,265€, 95% CI [2921-3610] and for OB to 3,722€, 95% CI [4407-6095]. Mean costs/day over all patients amounted to 208€, 95% CI [198-218]. The diagnosis AN predicted higher costs in comparison to OB (p=.0009). A co-morbid personality disorder (p=.0442), every one-unit increase in BMI in OB patients (p=.0256), every one-unit decrease in BMI in AN patients (p=.0002) and every additional life year in BN patients (p=.0455) predicted increased costs. CONCLUSION: We see a need for refinements to take into account considerable variations in treatment costs between patients with eating disorders due to diagnosis, BMI, co-morbid personality disorder and age.

[Do the New German OPS codes map the relevant therapeutic activities in psychiatric clinics?]. / Abbildung des psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutischen Leistungsspektrums durch die aktuellen OPS-Komplexcodes.

OBJECTIVE: Actual codes for operations and procedures (OPS) in psychiatry and psychosomatics should map cost separating therapeutic activities so far defined in Germany by the normative specifications of the psychiatry staff enactment (PsychPV). OPS codes should also allow re-estimating underlying therapy times. METHOD: Therapeutic activities of the PsychPV fulfilling the minimal criteria of the OPS definition were classified as multiples of a therapeutic 25 minute unit. RESULTS: Therapeutic activities of the PsychPV are mapped to OPS complex codes in a variable degree (psychiatrists 35 %, psychologists 42 %, nurses 43 %, special therapists 59 %). CONCLUSION: Actual OPS codes are inappropriate for identifying relevant cost-separating factors in the therapy of psychiatric in-patients. They cannot assure in their actual form the standards given by the PsychPV and need substantial revision.

Psychosomatic approach is the new medicine tailored for patient personality with a focus on ethics, economy, and quality.

Over the last 40 years the proliferation of the biopsychosocial (BPS) model across clinical and theoretical research has shown that psychosocial factors can be shown to be causes, co-factors, or sequelae of many illnesses. Scientific presuppositions about the BPS model have been grounded firmly in psychobiological, psycho-behavioural, sociobiological, and socio-behavioural processes. According to the allostatic load model, stressful factors can be psychological ones or any other factor that is able to modify the stress-response system; these might include genetic factors or life experiences. Personality profiles, in particular, seem to be predictive of responses to different stressors. Stress responses preceding or following illness are clearly related, from a psychobiological point of view, to different personality traits, which themselves correlate to specific defence mechanisms. Neural processes underlying these mechanisms interact with the biological substrate of somatic illnesses. Recent advances in brain imaging with regard to neurobiological and behavioural interactions of empathy and alexithymia support the crucial role of the (psycho) therapeutic relationship across the whole of medical practice. Psychotherapies operate as biological factors on mind, brain, and body; indeed it is necessary to reconsider the doctor-patient relationship as a psychotherapeutic process. The basic methodological triad of observation (outer viewing), introspection (inner viewing), and dialogue (inter viewing) becomes essential in medical practice and in scientific research. Psychoanalytic processes such as transference, resistance, the therapeutic alliance, and attachment have been reconsidered from a neuroscientific perspective and reconceived as moments of meeting of the procedural memory and are therefore considered relevant to the relationship with patients in primary care. Indeed, they are useful to an ethical approach to understanding the meaning of illness, and they also influence the results of treatment projects. Because all these aspects impact upon illness duration and quality of life, affecting both the individual concerned and his or her family, the economic consequences of this psychosomatic approach are important in both general and specialist medicine. Medicine is becoming, and will become even more in the future, an integrated science; human illness and the maintenance of good health may be better understood if all medical disciplines are considered as a whole. The domain of psychosomatic medicine has now extended to coincide with that of medical practice. There is increasing evidence, not only in psychiatry, but in all medical fields, that care of the mental well-being of a person is essential for effective care of the body. Not only mens sana in corpore sano, but also corpus sanus in mente sana.

[The hospital financing frame regulation, psychiatric OPS figures and new reimbursement ordinance for psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy as well as psychiatry and psychotherapy]. / Das Krankenhausfinanzierungsrahmengesetz (KHRG), die Psych-OPS-Ziffern und die neue Entgeltregelung für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie sowie Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

In March 2009 the "Krankenhausfinanzierungsrahmengesetz (KHRG)" (Hospital Finance Law) came into force. For this reason, new procedures covering psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic und psychiatric-psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment had to be developed. This paper presents the new Psych-Procedures (Psych-OPS) together with first instructions on coding procedures.