Distinct patterns of metabolic motor cortex activity for phantom and residual limb pain in people with amputations: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

BACKGROUND: Phantom pain limb (PLP) has gained more attention due to the large number of people with amputations around the world and growing knowledge of the pain process, although its mechanisms are not completely understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to understand, in patients with amputations, the association between PLP and residual limb pain (RLP), and the brain metabolic response in cortical motor circuits, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). METHODS: Sixty participants were recruited from the rehabilitation program in São Paulo, Brazil. Included patients were aged over 18 years, with traumatic unilateral lower-limb amputation, with PLP for at least 3 months after full recovery from amputation surgery. PLP and RLP levels were measured using visual analogue scales. fNIRS was performed during motor execution and motor mirror tasks for 20 s. In order to highlight possible variables related to variation in pain measures, univariate linear regression analyses were performed for both experimental conditions, resulting in four fNIRS variables (two hemispheres x two experimental conditions). Later, in order to test the topographic specificity of the models, eight multivariate regression analyses were performed (two pain scales x two experimental conditions x two hemispheres), including the primary motor cortex (PMC) related channel as an independent variable as well as five other channels related to the premotor area, supplementary area, and somatosensory cortex. All models were controlled for age, sex, ethnicity, and education. RESULTS: We found that: i) there is an asymmetric metabolic activation during motor execution and mirror task between hemispheres (with a predominance that is ipsilateral to the amputated limb), ii) increased metabolic response in the PMC ipsilateral to the amputation is associated with increased PLP (during both experimental tasks), while increased metabolic response in the contralateral PMC is associated with increased RLP (during the mirror motor task only); ii) increased metabolic activity of the ipsilateral premotor region is associated with increased PLP during the motor mirror task; iii) RLP was only associated with higher metabolic activity in the contralateral PMC and lower metabolic activity in the ipsilateral inferior frontal region during motor mirror task, but PLP was associated with higher metabolic activity during both tasks. CONCLUSION: These results suggest there is both task and region specificity for the association between the brain metabolic response and the two different types of post-amputation pain. The metabolic predominance that is ipsilateral to the amputated limb during both tasks was associated with higher levels of PLP, suggesting a cortical motor network activity imbalance due to potential interhemispheric compensatory mechanisms. The present work contributes to the understanding of the underlying topographical patterns in the motor-related circuits associated with pain after amputations.

[Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Mirror Therapy on Phantom Limb Pain in Amputees].

Objective: To investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on phantom limb pain (PLP) in amputees, and to compare the therapeutic effect with that of mirror therapy (MT). Methods: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. The evaluators were blinded, while the subjects and the therapists were unblinded. Subjects were randomly assigned to either the rTMS group or the MT group with a computer-generated random number table. From June 2018 to December 2020, from out of 45 amputee patients screened for the study, 30 who met the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. All patients were recruited from the Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University. In the end, 4 patients withdrew from the study and 26 patients (12 in the rTMS group and 14 in the MT group) completed the prescribed treatment and evaluation. The rTMS group was given rTMS (1 Hz, 15 min, 5 d/week) for 2 weeks in addition to conventional rehabilitation therapy, while the MT group received MT (corresponding movements of limbs, 15 min, 5 d/week) for 2 weeks in addition to conventional rehabilitation therapy. PLP was evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN-4). Subjects were assessed before treatment ( t 0), immediately after the completion of the treatment ( t 1) and 3 months after the completion of the treatment ( t 2). Results: The mean age of the 26 patients was 39.73±12.64. There were 15 males and 11 females. According to the reported description of the characteristics of the PLP by the patients, the characteristics with the highest incidence were tingling, stabbing, numbing, electric shocks and burning in descending order. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PLP characteristics between the two groups ( P>0.05). The two groups had comparable baseline data, showing no significant difference in VAS and DN-4 between the two groups at t 0 ( P>0.05). At t 1 and t 2, the VAS and DN-4 scores were decreased from those of t 0, showing statistically significant difference in both groups ( P<0.01 for both scores). In the rTMS group, there was no significant difference between VAS and DN-4 scores at t 1 and those at t 2 ( P>0.05). In the MT group, the VAS and DN-4 scores at t 2 were significantly lower than those of t 1 ( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the rTMS group and MT group in the changes in pain measurements, i.e., VAS and DN-4 scores, before and after the intervention ( P>0.05). The 26 patients who completed the experiment showed no dizziness, headache, or other abnormalities during the study. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could improve PLP in amputees, and the improvement effect was comparable to that of mirror therapy.

Strategies for graded motor imagery for clients with phantom limb pain and cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with amputations often experience phantom limb pain (PLP) that can limit their participation in rehabilitation, prosthesis training, desired activities, and roles. One nonpharmacological rehabilitation intervention for PLP is graded motor imagery (GMI). There are several components to GMI, including right/left discrimination or laterality, motor imagery, sensory retraining, and mirror therapy. Successful implementation of GMI requires a range of cognitive skills, such as attention span, working memory, abstract reasoning, and planning. For individuals with PLP who concurrently display cognitive impairments, GMI protocols can be adapted using strategies derived from clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this technical clinical report was to discuss the application of clinically implemented cognitive compensation techniques to GMI instruction. STUDY DESIGN: Not applicable. METHODS: Clinical expert opinion to explore adaptations for GMI. TECHNIQUE: Graded motor imagery can be an effective tool for pain treatment; however, some clients may need greater clinician support due to existing cognitive difficulties. RESULTS: For clients to be successful, active engagement in learning about and implementing GMI techniques is necessary. CONCLUSIONS: When serving the lifetime amputation care needs of patients with cognitive deficits, we find that targeted learning strategies and accommodations can be helpful when introducing GMI concepts and skill development. Enhanced patient education techniques support client learning.

A scoping review of current non-pharmacological treatment modalities for phantom limb pain in limb amputees.

PURPOSE: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a chronic neuropathic pain condition of a missing limb following amputation. Pain management is multi-modal, including various non-pharmacological therapies. The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the evidence surrounding current non-pharmacological treatment modalities for PLP and provide insight into their clinical feasibility. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted using four databases (Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, and CINAHL) following the PRISMA-ScR method. Results from papers meeting the inclusion criteria were charted to summarize findings, demographics, and use of neuroimaging. RESULTS: A total of 3387 papers were identified, and full texts of 142 eligible papers were assessed. Eleven treatment modalities for PLP were identified with varying levels of evidence. Overall, there were 25 RCTs, 58 case reports, and 59 a combination of pilot, quasi-experimental, observational, and other study designs. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, the evidence surrounding most treatment modalities is limited and only a fraction of studies are supported by strong evidence. The findings of this review demonstrated a clear need to conduct more rigorous research with diverse study designs to better understand which modalities provide the most benefit and to incorporate neuroimaging to better determine the neural correlates of PLP and mechanisms of various treatments.Implications for RehabilitationPhantom limb pain (PLP) is a prevalent and debilitating condition following amputation and health care professionals should incorporate an evidence-based pain management protocol into their rehabilitation program.There exist a number of different non-pharmacological therapies to address PLP, however the scientific rigor and levels of evidence vary across modalities.Prescription of interventions for PLP should consider individual patient differences, accessibility to the patient, and quite possibly, a multi-modal approach, particularly for those who also experience residual limb pain.Imagery-based therapies provide the highest level of current evidence based on robust and large randomized control trials, are readily accessible, and are thus most recommended for relief of PLP.

Virtual Reality Treatment Displaying the Missing Leg Improves Phantom Limb Pain: A Small Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a common and in some cases debilitating consequence of upper- or lower-limb amputation for which current treatments are inadequate. OBJECTIVE: This small clinical trial tested whether game-like interactions with immersive VR activities can reduce PLP in subjects with transtibial lower-limb amputation. METHODS: Seven participants attended 5-7 sessions in which they engaged in a visually immersive virtual reality experience that did not require leg movements (Cool! TM), followed by 10-12 sessions of targeted lower-limb VR treatment consisting of custom games requiring leg movement. In the latter condition, they controlled an avatar with 2 intact legs viewed in a head-mounted display (HTC Vive TM). A motion-tracking system mounted on the intact and residual limbs controlled the movements of both virtual extremities independently. RESULTS: All participants except one experienced a reduction of pain immediately after VR sessions, and their pre session pain levels also decreased over the course of the study. At a group level, PLP decreased by 28% after the treatment that did not include leg movements and 39.6% after the games requiring leg motions. Both treatments were successful in reducing PLP. CONCLUSIONS: This VR intervention appears to be an efficacious treatment for PLP in subjects with lower-limb amputation.

Neural interfacing architecture enables enhanced motor control and residual limb functionality postamputation.

Despite advancements in prosthetic technologies, patients with amputation today suffer great diminution in mobility and quality of life. We have developed a modified below-knee amputation (BKA) procedure that incorporates agonist-antagonist myoneural interfaces (AMIs), which surgically preserve and couple agonist-antagonist muscle pairs for the subtalar and ankle joints. AMIs are designed to restore physiological neuromuscular dynamics, enable bidirectional neural signaling, and offer greater neuroprosthetic controllability compared to traditional amputation techniques. In this prospective, nonrandomized, unmasked study design, 15 subjects with AMI below-knee amputation (AB) were matched with 7 subjects who underwent a traditional below-knee amputation (TB). AB subjects demonstrated significantly greater control of their residual limb musculature, production of more differentiable efferent control signals, and greater precision of movement compared to TB subjects (P < 0.008). This may be due to the presence of greater proprioceptive inputs facilitated by the significantly higher fascicle strains resulting from coordinated muscle excursion in AB subjects (P < 0.05). AB subjects reported significantly greater phantom range of motion postamputation (AB: 12.47 ± 2.41, TB: 10.14 ± 1.45 degrees) when compared to TB subjects (P < 0.05). Furthermore, AB subjects also reported less pain (12.25 ± 5.37) than TB subjects (17.29 ± 10.22) and a significant reduction when compared to their preoperative baseline (P < 0.05). Compared with traditional amputation, the construction of AMIs during amputation confers the benefits of enhanced physiological neuromuscular dynamics, proprioception, and phantom limb perception. Subjects' activation of the AMIs produces more differentiable electromyography (EMG) for myoelectric prosthesis control and demonstrates more positive clinical outcomes.

Functional rehabilitation of a person with transfemoral amputation through guided motor imagery: a case study.

Background: Motor imagery (MI) is a mental technique, absent of physical movement, to foster movement patterns and relieve pain via a training model enacting the brain before the body. This case study assessed MI's efficacy in decreasing phantom limb pain and attaining functional gait and balance after lower extremity amputation. Description: The participant was a 71-year-old female with a transfemoral amputation seven years prior. She required a standard walker for ambulation. The participant underwent three sessions per week for four weeks of MI intervention, with immediate, post-test, and 1-week retention testing involving subjective and functional assessments. Intervention sessions involved quiet sitting with eyes closed while listening to the MI script. The scripts focused on functional movement patterns and tasks that were relevant to the participant, such as walking, balancing, and reaching. Each session's script focused on a different task. These scripts guided her through proper action and biomechanics of the skills to imagine herself moving safely and functionally. Outcomes: Short Form Berg Balance Scale and Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment scores demonstrated clinically important and sustained improvement. Further, the participant reported decreased phantom limb pain and could walk a short distance independently for the first time in seven years. Discussion: MI is a time- and cost-effective, low-risk treatment option that decreased phantom pain and improved balance and functional gait in an individual with an amputation. The use of MI as an intervention for the rehabilitation of persons with amputation must be further examined.

BCI training to move a virtual hand reduces phantom limb pain: A randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether training with a brain-computer interface (BCI) to control an image of a phantom hand, which moves based on cortical currents estimated from magnetoencephalographic signals, reduces phantom limb pain. METHODS: Twelve patients with chronic phantom limb pain of the upper limb due to amputation or brachial plexus root avulsion participated in a randomized single-blinded crossover trial. Patients were trained to move the virtual hand image controlled by the BCI with a real decoder, which was constructed to classify intact hand movements from motor cortical currents, by moving their phantom hands for 3 days ("real training"). Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and after training, and at follow-up for an additional 16 days. As a control, patients engaged in the training with the same hand image controlled by randomly changing values ("random training"). The 2 trainings were randomly assigned to the patients. This trial is registered at UMIN-CTR (UMIN000013608). RESULTS: VAS at day 4 was significantly reduced from the baseline after real training (mean [SD], 45.3 [24.2]-30.9 [20.6], 1/100 mm; p = 0.009 < 0.025), but not after random training (p = 0.047 > 0.025). Compared to VAS at day 1, VAS at days 4 and 8 was significantly reduced by 32% and 36%, respectively, after real training and was significantly lower than VAS after random training (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Three-day training to move the hand images controlled by BCI significantly reduced pain for 1 week. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that BCI reduces phantom limb pain.

Management of Post-Amputation Pain.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of amputation and post-amputation pain (PAP) is rising. There are two main types of PAP: residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP), with an estimated 95% of people with amputations experiencing one or both. Medical Management: The majority of chronic PAP is due to phantom limb pain, which is neurogenic in nature. Common medications used include tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, and opioids. Newer studies are evaluating alternative drugs such as ketamine and local anesthetics. Rehabilitation Management: Mirror visual feedback and cognitive behavioral therapy are often effective adjunct therapies and have minimal adverse effects. Surgical Management: Neuromodulatory treatment and surgery for neuromas have been found to help select patients with PAP. CONCLUSION: PAP is a complex condition with mechanisms that can be located at the residual limb, spinal cord, and brain - or a combination. This complex pain can be difficult to treat. The mainstays of treatment are largely medical, but several surgical options are also being studied.

Direct evidence of EEG coherence in alleviating phantom limb pain by virtual referred sensation: Case report.

Virtual reality (VR) systems have been integrated into rehabilitation techniques for phantom limb pain (PLP). In this case report, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze corticocortical coherence between the bilateral sensorimotor cortices during vibrotactile stimulation in conjunction with VR rehabilitation in two PLP patients. As a result, we observed PLP alleviation and increased alpha wave coherence during VR rehabilitation when stimulation was delivered to the cheek and shoulder (referred sensation areas) of the affected side. Vibrotactile stimulation with VR rehabilitation may enhance the awareness and movement of the phantom hand.

Visual responsiveness in sensorimotor cortex is increased following amputation and reduced after mirror therapy.

Phantom limb pain (PLP) following amputation, which is experienced by the vast majority of amputees, has been reported to be relieved with daily sessions of mirror therapy. During each session, a mirror is used to view the reflected image of the intact limb moving, providing visual feedback consistent with the movement of the missing/phantom limb. To investigate potential neural correlates of the treatment effect, we measured brain responses in volunteers with unilateral leg amputation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a four-week course of mirror therapy. Mirror therapy commenced immediately following baseline scans, which were repeated after approximately two and four week intervals. We focused on responses in the region of sensorimotor cortex corresponding to primary somatosensory and motor representations of the missing leg. At baseline, prior to starting therapy, we found a strong and unexpected response in sensorimotor cortex of amputees to visually presented images of limbs. This response was stronger for images of feet compared to hands and there was no such response in matched controls. Further, this response to visually presented limbs was no longer present at the end of the four week mirror therapy treatment, when perceived phantom limb pain was also reduced. A similar pattern of results was also observed in extrastriate and parietal regions typically responsive to viewing hand actions, but not in regions corresponding to secondary somatosensory cortex. Finally, there was a significant correlation between initial visual responsiveness in sensorimotor cortex and reduction in PLP suggesting a potential marker for predicting efficacy of mirror therapy. Thus, enhanced visual responsiveness in sensorimotor cortex is associated with PLP and modulated over the course of mirror therapy.

Feasibility of a traditional and teletreatment approach to mirror therapy in patients with phantom limb pain: a process evaluation performed alongside a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the delivery, acceptance and experiences regarding a traditional and teletreatment approach to mirror therapy as delivered in a randomized controlled trial. DESIGN: Mixed methods, prospective study. SETTING: Rehabilitation centres, hospital and private practices. SUBJECTS: Adult patients with phantom pain following lower limb amputation and their treating physical and occupational therapists. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 4 weeks of traditional mirror therapy (n = 51), followed by 6 weeks of teletreatment (n = 26) or 6 weeks of self-delivered mirror therapy (n = 25). MAIN MEASURES: Patient files, therapist logs, log files teletreatment, acceptance questionnaire and interviews with patients and their therapists. RESULTS: In all, 51 patients and 10 therapists participated in the process evaluation. Only 16 patients (31%) received traditional mirror therapy according to the clinical framework during the first 4 weeks. Between weeks 5 and 10, the teletreatment was used by 14 patients (56%) with sufficient dose. Teletreatment usage decreased from a median number of 31 (weeks 5-10) to 19 sessions (weeks 11-24). Satisfactory teletreatment user acceptance rates were found with patients demonstrating higher scores (e.g. regarding the usefulness to control pain) than therapists. Potential barriers for implementation of the teletreatment perceived by patients and therapists were related to insufficient training and support as well as the frequency of technical problems. CONCLUSION: Traditional mirror therapy and the teletreatment were not delivered as intended in the majority of patients. Implementation of the teletreatment in daily routines was challenging, and more research is needed to evaluate user characteristics that influence adherence and how technology features can be optimized to develop tailored implementation strategies.

VITA-an everyday virtual reality setup for prosthetics and upper-limb rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, there are some 95 000 people in Europe suffering from upper-limb impairment. Rehabilitation should be undertaken right after the impairment occurs and should be regularly performed thereafter. Moreover, the rehabilitation process should be tailored specifically to both patient and impairment. APPROACH: To address this, we have developed a low-cost solution that integrates an off-the-shelf virtual reality (VR) setup with our in-house developed arm/hand intent detection system. The resulting system, called VITA, enables an upper-limb disabled person to interact in a virtual world as if her impaired limb were still functional. VITA provides two specific features that we deem essential: proportionality of force control and interactivity between the user and the intent detection core. The usage of relatively cheap commercial components enables VITA to be used in rehabilitation centers, hospitals, or even at home. The applications of VITA range from rehabilitation of patients with musculodegenerative conditions (e.g. ALS), to treating phantom-limb pain of people with limb-loss and prosthetic training. MAIN RESULTS: We present a multifunctional system for upper-limb rehabilitation in VR. We tested the system using a VR implementation of a standard hand assessment tool, the Box and Block test and performed a user study on this standard test with both intact subjects and a prosthetic user. Furthermore, we present additional applications, showing the versatility of the system. SIGNIFICANCE: The VITA system shows the applicability of a combination of our experience in intent detection with state-of-the art VR system for rehabilitation purposes. With VITA, we have an easily adaptable experimental tool available, which allows us to quickly and realistically simulate all kind of real-world problems and rehabilitation exercises for upper-limb impaired patients. Additionally, other scenarios such as prostheses simulations and control modes can be quickly implemented and tested.

A comparison of the effects of mirror therapy and phantom exercises on phantom limb pain

Background/aim: Although mirror therapy (MT) and phantom exercises (PE) have been shown to reduce pain, the efficacy of these methods in terms of pain, quality of life (QoL), and psychological status (PS) has not been investigated and compared to date. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any difference between MT and PE in the treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP). Materials and methods: Forty unilateral transtibial amputees (aged 18­45 years) participated in this study. The subjects were randomly divided into 'MT group' and 'PE group'. QoL was assessed using Short-Form 36 (SF-36), psychological status using the Beck depression inventory (BDI), and pain intensity using a visual analog scale (VAS), before and at the end of the program, and on the 3rd and 6th months thereafter. Results: All assessments for all parameters improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.05). Comparison of the two groups revealed a significant difference in changes for VAS and BDI in all measurements, and in pre- and posttreatment scores for all SF-36 parameters (except for Role-Emotional) in favor of the MT group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: While pain intensity decreased and QoL and PS improved in both the MT and PE groups, these improvements were greater in the MT group.

Managing limb pain using virtual reality: a systematic review of clinical and experimental studies.

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of virtual representation of body parts on pain perception in patients with pain and in pain-free participants exposed to experimentally induced pain.Methods: Databases searched: Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Studies investigating participants with clinical pain or those who were pain free and exposed to experimentally induced pain were analysed separately.Results: Eighteen clinical studies and seven experimental studies were included. Randomised controlled clinical trials showed no significant difference between intervention and control groups for pain intensity. Clinical studies with a single group pretest-posttest design showed a reduction in pain after intervention. In the studies including a sample of pain free participants exposed to experimentally induced pain there was an increase in pain threshold when the virtual arm was collocated with the real arm, when it moved in synchrony with the real arm, and when the colour of the stimulated part of the virtual arm became blue. Observing a virtual arm covered with iron armour reduced pain.Conclusions: The use of virtual representations of body parts to reduce pain is promising. However, due to the poor methodological quality and limitations of primary studies, we could not find conclusive evidence.Implications for rehabilitationVirtual reality has been increasingly used in the rehabilitation of painful and dysfunctional limbs.Virtual reality can be used to distract attention away from acute pain and may also provide corrective psychological and physiological environments.Virtual representation of body parts has been used to provide a corrective re-embodiment of painful dysmorphic body parts, and primary research shows promising results.

Characteristics of Phantom Limb Pain Alleviated with Virtual Reality Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: Neurorehabilitation techniques using virtual reality (VR) systems have recently become widespread as a rehabilitation method for restoring phantom limb movement and alleviating phantom limb pain (PLP). However, analgesic effects have varied between studies, possibly because of differences in the characteristics of PLP between patients (e.g., cramping, burning, shooting). We aimed to reveal the relationship between VR effects and PLP characteristics using an exploratory factor analysis. METHODS: PLP characteristics of 19 patients were measured using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and all PLP patients performed the VR rehabilitation protocol for 20 minutes. During VR rehabilitation, mirror-reversed computer graphic images of an intact arm (the virtual phantom limb) were presented to patients via a head-mounted display, inducing the perception of voluntary execution of movements of their phantom limb when intending bimanual movements. RESULTS: VR rehabilitation significantly restored movement representation (P < 0.0001) quantified using the bimanual coupling effect and significantly alleviated PLP intensity (P < 0.0001). The factor analysis revealed that PLP characteristics could be divided into two factors: "somatosensory-related pain characteristics" and "kinesthesia-related pain characteristics." PLP alleviation via VR rehabilitation was significantly correlated with "kinesthesia-related pain characteristics" (r = 0.47, P = 0.02) but not "somatosensory-related pain characteristics" (r = 0.22, P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: The current findings indicate that VR rehabilitation may be particularly effective for PLP associated with distorted phantom limb movement and body representations (e.g., clamping, gnawing), compared with typical neuropathic sensations (e.g., shooting, burning, dysesthesia).

Terapia do espelho em pacientes amputados por câncer com dor e sensação de membro fantasma ­ estudo piloto / [Mirror therapy in cancer amputee patients with pain and sensation of phantom limb - pilot study]

Introduction: Feeling and phantom pain are common sequelae after amputation of a limb from the body. Its etiology is not fully elucidated but is considered as a type of sensation and neuropathic pain perceived in the lost portion of the amputated limb caused by pathology in the central neurons with probable influences of peripheral and psychological mechanisms. The prevalence of phantom pain can be observed with variation of 26% and 80% of cancer patients who underwent this procedure. Alternative interventions called non-pharmacological therapies such as Mirror Therapy have increased attention for the treatment of sensation and phantom pain. The mirror image of normal body parts can help to reorganize and integrate the mismatch between proprioception and visual feedback of the amputated limb and may contribute to future appropriate interventions of this phenomenon. Objective: Investigate the effects of Mirror Therapy in cancer amputated patients with phantom limb pain and sensation. Materials and methods: A pilot study was designed as a randomized clinical trial with eight patients from 12 years of age, with reports of pain and phantom sensation after amputation of limb due to cancer, which were followed up in the adult and pediatric physiotherapy sectors, among May to November 2018, from 30 days of surgery, at a referral center for cancer treatment. The patients in the study were randomized into two groups, the Control Group (n=5), who underwent standard physiotherapy (exercises and braces of the stump) and the Mirror Therapy group (n=3) the Mirror Therapy. Results: Preliminary findings evaluating the initial effectiveness of Mirror Therapy in cancer patients are reported here. At the end of the study, three patients reported decreased drug use and the characteristics of phantom and phantom pain. Conclusion: Although the results were inconclusive, other studies with a larger population and robust methods of analysis encourage a broader investigation in the oncological population in order to improve and make appropriate adjustments in the evaluation and treatment of the therapy used.

Relieving phantom limb pain with multimodal sensory-motor training.

OBJECTIVE: The causes for the disabling condition of phantom limb pain (PLP), affecting 85% of amputees, are so far unknown, with few effective treatments available. Sensory feedback based strategies to normalize the motor commands to control the phantom limb offer important targets for new effective treatments as the correlation between phantom limb motor control and sensory feedback from the motor intention has been identified as a possible mechanism for PLP development. APPROACH: Ten upper-limb amputees, suffering from chronic PLP, underwent 16 days of intensive training on phantom-limb movement control. Visual and tactile feedback, driven by muscular activity at the stump, was provided with the aim of reducing PLP intensity. MAIN RESULTS: A 32.1% reduction of PLP intensity was obtained at the follow-up (6 weeks after the end of the training, with an initial 21.6% reduction immediately at the end of the training) reaching clinical effectiveness for chronic pain reduction. Multimodal sensory-motor training on phantom-limb movements with visual and tactile feedback is a new method for PLP reduction. SIGNIFICANCE: The study results revealed a substantial reduction in phantom limb pain intensity, obtained with a new training protocol focused on improving phantom limb motor output using visual and tactile feedback from the stump muscular activity executed to move the phantom limb.

Mirror therapy for phantom limb and stump pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial in landmine amputees in Cambodia.

Background and aims The aim of the study was to examine the effect of mirror and tactile therapy on phantom and stump pain in patients with traumatic amputations, with particular reference to amputees in low-income communities. Methods The study was conducted with an open, randomized, semi-crossover case-control design in rural Cambodia. A study sample of 45 landmine victims with trans-tibial amputations was allocated to three treatment arms; mirror therapy, tactile therapy, and combined mirror-and-tactile therapy. Non-responders from the mono-therapy interventions were crossed over to the alternative intervention. The intervention consisted of 5 min of treatment every morning and evening for 4 weeks. Endpoint estimates of phantom limb pain (PLP), stump pain, and physical function were registered 3 months after the treatment. Results All three interventions were associated with more that 50% reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS)-rated PLP and stump pain. Combined mirror-tactile treatment had a significantly better effect on PLP and stump pain than mirror or tactile therapy alone. The difference between the three treatment arms were however slight, and hardly of clinical relevance. After treatment, the reduction of pain remained unchanged for an observation period of 3 months. Conclusions The study documents that a 4-week treatment period with mirror and/or tactile therapy significantly reduces PLP and stump pain after trans-tibial amputations. Implications The article reports for the first time a randomized controlled trial of mirror therapy in a homogenous sample of persons with traumatic amputations. The findings are of special relevance to amputees in low-resource communities.

High-density peripheral nerve cuffs restore natural sensation to individuals with lower-limb amputations.

OBJECTIVE: Sensory input in lower-limb amputees is critically important to maintaining balance, preventing falls, negotiating uneven terrain, responding to unexpected perturbations, and developing the confidence required for societal participation and public interactions in unfamiliar environments. Despite noteworthy advances in robotic prostheses for lower-limb amputees, such as microprocessor knees and powered ankles, natural somatosensory feedback from the lost limb has not yet been incorporated in current prosthetic technologies. APPROACH: In this work, we report eliciting somatic sensation with neural stimulation delivered by chronically-implanted, non-penetrating nerve cuff electrodes in two transtibial amputees. High-density, flexible, 16-contact nerve cuff electrodes were surgically implanted for the selective activation of sensory fascicles in the nerves of the posterior thigh above the knee. Electrical pulses at safe levels were delivered to the nerves by an external stimulator via percutaneous leads attached to the cuff electrodes. MAIN RESULTS: The neural stimulation was perceived by participants as sensation originating from the missing limb. We quantitatively and qualitatively ascertained the intensity, modality as well as the location and stability of the perceived sensations. Stimulation through individual contacts within the nerve cuffs evoked repeatable sensations of various modalities and at discrete locations projected to the missing toes, foot and ankle, as well as in the residual limb. In addition, we observed a high overlap in reported locations between distal versus proximal cuffs suggesting that the same sensory responses could be elicited from more proximal points on the nerve. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on these findings, the high-density cuff technology is suitable for restoring natural sensation to lower-limb amputees and could be utilized in developing a neuroprosthesis with natural sensory feedback. The overlap in reported locations between proximal and distal cuffs indicates that our approach might be applicable to transfemoral amputees where distal muscles and branches of sciatic nerve are not available.