Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.878
Filtrar
1.
Skin Therapy Lett ; 29(5): 1-9, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39353178

RESUMO

Pain management is an important aspect of dermatologic procedures, which are typically performed on awake patients in outpatient settings. The first-line modalities for procedural analgesia during most dermatologic procedures are topical and injectable local anesthetics, such as lidocaine. However, in some medical and cosmetic dermatologic procedures, pain cannot be effectively managed with local anesthetics due to procedure-specific lack of efficacy, large treatment surface areas, high dosage requirements, allergies, or other contraindications. In these circumstances, methoxyflurane inhalers may be highly beneficial. Methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) has demonstrated efficacy for providing pain relief in randomized controlled trials in patients who presented to emergency departments with acute trauma-related pain, as well as in patients undergoing painful procedures for other medical indications. The limited side effect profile, ease of patient self-administration, rapid onset and quick resolution of central nervous system effects following cessation makes methoxyflurane an ideal choice for analgesia during outpatient dermatologic procedures. This review provides an overview of the supporting evidence for methoxyflurane inhalers and clinical commentary on potential indications for methoxyflurane use in dermatology.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios , Metoxiflurano , Humanos , Metoxiflurano/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Administração por Inalação , Analgesia/métodos
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 68(10): 1306-1318, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39327650

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many prehospital emergency patients receive suboptimal treatment for their moderate to severe pain. Various factors may contribute. We aim to systematically review literature pertaining to prehospital emergency adult patients with acute pain and the pain-reducing effects, adverse events (AEs), and safety issues associated with inhaled analgetic agents compared with other prehospital analgesic agents. METHODS: As part of an initiative from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, we conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42018114399), applying the PRISMA guidelines, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), and Cochrane methods, searching the Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, PubMed, and EMBASE databases (updated March 2024). Inclusion criteria were the use of inhaled analgesic agents in adult patients with acute pain in the prehospital emergency care setting. All steps were performed by minimum of two individual researchers. The primary outcome was pain reduction; secondary outcomes were speed of onset, duration of effect, and relevant AEs. RESULTS: We included seven studies (56,535 patients in total) that compared inhaled agents (methoxyflurane [MF] and nitrous oxide [N2O]) to other drugs or placebo. Study designs were randomized controlled trial (1; n = 60), randomized non-blinded study (1; n = 343), and randomized open-label study (1; n = 270). The remaining were prospective or retrospective observational studies. The evidence according to GRADE was of low or very low quality. No combined meta-analysis was possible. N2O may reduce pain compared to placebo, but not compared to intravenous (IV) paracetamol, and may be less effective compared to morphine and MF. MF may reduce pain compared to paracetamol, ketoprofen, tramadol, and fentanyl. Both agents may be associated with marked but primarily mild AEs. CONCLUSION: We found low-quality evidence suggesting that both MF and N2O are safe and may have a role in the management of pain in the prehospital setting. There is low-quality evidence to support MF as a short-acting single analgesic or as a bridge to IV access and the administration of other analgesics. There may be occupational health issues regarding the prehospital use of N2O.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Analgésicos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Humanos , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Administração por Inalação , Óxido Nitroso/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Dor/métodos
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 302: 206-210, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39303369

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Penthrox® (methoxyflurane) is a convenient, portable, self-administered disposable single-use handheld inhaler licenced as an emergency, rapid-onset, short-acting, analgesic in adult trauma patients. Outpatient hysteroscopy is one of the commonest procedures in contemporary gynecology but it can be associated with significant pain leading to poor patient experience and failed procedures. We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of Penthrox® in women undergoing outpatient hysteroscopic procedures and its potential efficacy to reduce pain and improve patient experience. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study on women undergoing hysteroscopy or other intrauterine procedures, such as coil fitting, endometrial biopsy, polypectomy, endometrial ablation and manual vacuum aspiration in an outpatient setting. Women were offered Penthrox® inhalers for pain control, instructed how to use it and asked to record the intra-procedural pain they expected and actually experienced using a 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale. The acceptability, side effects and ease of use of the Penthrox® device were also recorded. RESULTS: 122/146 (83.6 %) women chose to use Penthrox®. 116 out of the 122 (95.1 %) underwent an intrauterine procedure, including 59 hysteroscopic polypectomies and 34 global endometrial ablations. The average pain expected during the procedure was 6.0 (SD = 2.8) and the pain experienced during the procedure was 5.1 (SD = 2.8). The intended procedure was completed in 117 (96 %) women. Penthrox® was considered easy to use by 118 (97 %) women and 111 (91 %) would use it again, although 22 (18 %) women would prefer general anaesthesia in the future. No adverse events occurred but 88 (72 %) women reported mild, self-limiting side effects. CONCLUSION: Penthrox® appears safe, feasible and acceptable as a pain relief option during outpatient hysteroscopy and other intrauterine procedures. The effectiveness of Penthrox® should be evaluated against conventional pain control in an adequately powered multicentre randomised controlled trial.


Assuntos
Histeroscopia , Metoxiflurano , Humanos , Feminino , Histeroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Metoxiflurano/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Administração por Inalação , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Dor Processual/prevenção & controle , Dor Processual/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Idoso
4.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 68(6): 705-713, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38923825

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Procedural sedation and pain management in interventional radiology (IR) are of critical importance to successful outcomes but remain under-researched. Methoxyflurane has been previously used in some minor procedures with several advantages including rapid onset and offset and a good safety profile. The purpose of this study was to evaluate methoxyflurane for procedures in IR. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed between October 2021 and November 2022. Patients presenting for portacath insertion, portacath removal or solid organ biopsy were randomised to either methoxyflurane or placebo. Three hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled in total. Patients were supplied with one Penthrox inhaler containing either 3 mL methoxyflurane or placebo. The primary endpoints of the study were change in pain and anxiety scores compared with baseline, measured on a standardised visual analogue scale (VAS) pre-procedure, at 5-min intervals during the procedure and post-procedure. Baselines scores were controlled for in the statistical analysis. Safety analysis was also performed. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-nine patients received methoxyflurane and 145 received placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The methoxyflurane group had lower pain and anxiety scores throughout the procedure (P < 0.001) with 2.5 times less pain (VAS 1.08/10) and 1.6 times less anxiety (VAS 0.97/10) on average. Lower post-procedure pain (mean 0.72 vs 1.44; P < 0.001) and anxiety (mean 0.55 vs 1.13; P = 0.008) were also observed with methoxyflurane. There were no drug or major procedure-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that methoxyflurane provides safe and effective analgesia and anxiolysis for some procedures in IR.


Assuntos
Metoxiflurano , Medição da Dor , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Ansiedade , Idoso , Radiologia Intervencionista , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Adulto
5.
Br Dent J ; 236(9): 680-682, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730155

RESUMO

Nitrous oxide is a widely used and well-established form of inhalation sedation in dentistry. Its properties have a wide margin of safety and allow for anxious, paediatric and adult patients to receive dental treatment with minimal impact upon discharge. Nitrous oxide has drawbacks, however, including its environmental impact and need for specialist equipment. Methoxyflurane is another drug which could prove to be an alternative to nitrous oxide. Methoxyflurane's use has proved popular within emergency medicine in Australia and New Zealand for its potent analgesic effects and recognition of its anxiolytic effect. As a result, its use in invasive outpatient procedures has now become popular. Unfortunately, there is very limited evidence of its use within dentistry as a form of inhalation sedation and analgesic. A wider evidence base should be established, as methoxyflurane could prove to be an effective and environmentally friendly alternative to nitrous oxide.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Metoxiflurano , Óxido Nitroso , Humanos , Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/administração & dosagem , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Isoflurano/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Metoxiflurano/farmacologia , Óxido Nitroso/administração & dosagem
6.
Can J Urol ; 31(1): 11802-11808, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401260

RESUMO

Minimally invasive surgery techniques (MIST) have become newly adopted in urological care.  Given this, new analgesic techniques are important in optimizing patient outcomes and resource management. Rezum treatment (RT) for BPH has emerged as a new MIST with excellent patient outcomes, including improving quality of life (QoL) and International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSSs), while also preserving sexual function.  Currently, the standard analgesic approach for RT involves a peri-prostatic nerve block (PNB) using a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or systemic sedation anesthesia.  The TRUS approach is invasive, uncomfortable, and holds a risk of infection.  Additionally, alternative methods such as, inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox), nitric oxide, general anesthesia, as well as intravenous (IV) sedation pose safety risks or mandate the presence of an anesthesiology team.  Transurethral intraprostatic anesthesia (TUIA) using the Schelin Catheter (ProstaLund, Lund, Sweden) (SC) provides a new, non-invasive, and efficient technique for out-patient, office based Rezum procedures.  Through local administration of an analgesic around the prostate base, the SC has been shown to reduce pain, procedure times, and bleeding during MISTs.  Herein, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of TUIA via the SC in a cohort of 10 patients undergoing in-patient RT for BPH.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Bloqueio Nervoso , Hiperplasia Prostática , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Metoxiflurano , Catéteres , Analgésicos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Br Dent J ; 236(2): 124-129, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278910

RESUMO

Methoxyflurane (MOF) as an agent for dental sedation has been used safely in Australasia for decades. The drug is now licensed for relief of pain associated with trauma and is being used during several medical outpatient procedures in the stead of traditional intravenous agents for sedation in the UK. Our aim was to analyse the safety and feasibility of the introduction of MOF as a drug for dental sedation in the UK community setting and assess its environmental impact. A literature review was conducted for available studies and a research audit of medical histories of patients that received nitrous oxide sedation in the previous year was carried out to assess suitability for MOF administration. The published literature shows MOF to be a safe drug for administration in the dental environment and local patients receiving nitrous oxide sedation are medically suitable for MOF administration. The advantages of considering MOF sedation are its environmental benefit and patient acceptability.


Assuntos
Anestesia Dentária , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Humanos , Óxido Nitroso/efeitos adversos , Metoxiflurano/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Anestesia Dentária/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Dentária/métodos , Sedação Consciente/métodos
8.
Emerg Med J ; 41(2): 69-75, 2024 Jan 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37770121

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The NHS has the target of reducing its carbon emission by 80% by 2032. Part of its strategy is using pharmaceuticals with a less harmful impact on the environment. Nitrous oxide is currently used widely within the NHS. Nitrous oxide, if released into the atmosphere, has a significant environmental impact. Methoxyflurane, delivered through the Penthrox 'green whistle' device, is a short-acting analgesic and is thought to have a smaller environmental impact compared with nitrous oxide. METHODS: Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of all products and processes involved in the manufacture and use of Penthrox, using data from the manufacturer, online sources and LCIA inventory Ecoinvent. These data were analysed in OpenLCA. Impact data were compared with existing data on nitrous oxide and morphine sulfate. RESULTS: This LCIA found that Penthrox has a climate change effect of 0.84 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). Raw materials and the production process contributed to majority of the impact of Penthrox across all categories with raw materials accounting for 34.40% of the total climate change impact. Penthrox has a climate change impact of 117.7 times less CO2e compared with Entonox. 7 mg of 100 mg/100 mL of intravenous morphine sulfate had a climate change effect of 0.01 kg CO2e. CONCLUSIONS: This LCIA has shown that the overall 'cradle-to-grave' environmental impact of Penthrox device is better than nitrous oxide when looking specifically at climate change impact. The climate change impact for an equivalent dose of intravenous morphine was even lower. Switching to the use of inhaled methoxyflurane instead of using nitrous oxide in certain clinical situations could help the NHS to reach its carbon emission reduction target.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Humanos , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Óxido Nitroso , Morfina , Dor , Meio Ambiente
9.
Can J Urol ; 30(6): 11741-11746, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104332

RESUMO

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) is a common modality used during urological procedures that require real-time visualization of the prostate, such as prostate biopsy and peri-prostatic nerve blocks (PNB) for surgical procedures. Current practice for TRUS-guided PNB requires use of costly, fixed, and non-portable ultrasound machinery that can often limit workflow. The Clarius endocavity EC7 probe, a digital, handheld and pocket-sized endocavity ultrasound (US) device, is an alternative, portable technology which was recently shown to accurately visualize and measure prostate dimensions and volume. Moreover, in recent years, there has been a renaissance of office-based treatments for minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). More specifically, the Rezum procedure has been demonstrated to offer men a short, outpatient therapy with excellent 5-year outcomes in durability and preservation of antegrade ejaculation. While other anesthetic techniques have been described for Rezum, including inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox), nitrous oxide, IV sedation and general anesthesia (which often mandate the presence of an anesthesiology team), US-guided local blocks offer the urologist an independent method for pain management. While most urologists may not have direct access to expensive, cart-based ultrasound systems, point of care ultrasound (POCUS) technology, such as Clarius (Vancouver, BC, Canada) and Butterfly (Butterfly Network, Inc, Guilford, CT, USA), can provide high-resolution imaging in combination with smart phone technology. Herein, we sought to describe the technique for using Clarius EC7 for TRUS-guided PNB and its use in urological application with the Rezum BPH procedure.


Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso , Hiperplasia Prostática , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagem , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Ultrassonografia , Metoxiflurano
10.
Trials ; 24(1): 571, 2023 Sep 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37670364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital pain management has traditionally been performed with intravenous (IV) morphine, but oligoanalgesia remain a recognized problem. Pain reduction is essential for patient satisfaction and is regarded as a measure of successful treatment. We aim to establish whether non-invasive methods such as inhalation of methoxyflurane is non-inferior to intranasal fentanyl or non-inferior to the well-known IV morphine in the pre-hospital treatment of acute pain. METHOD/DESIGN: The PreMeFen study is a phase three, three-armed, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial to compare three regimens of analgesics: inhalation of methoxyflurane and intranasal (IN) fentanyl versus IV morphine. It is an open-label trial with a 1:1:1 randomization to the three treatment groups. The primary endpoint is the change in pain numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) from baseline to 10 min after start of investigational medicinal product administration (IMP). The non-inferiority margin was set to 1.3, and a sample size of 270 patients per protocol (90 in each treatment arm) will detect this difference with 90% power. DISCUSSION: We chose a study design with comparison of analgesic regimens rather than fixed doses because of the substantial differences in drug characteristics and for the results to be relevant to inform policymakers in the pre-hospital setting. We recognize that easier administration of analgesics will lead to better pain management for many patients if the regimens are as good as the existing, and hence, we chose a non-inferiority design. The primary endpoint, the change in pain (NRS) after 10 min, is set to address the immediate need of pain reduction for patients with acute prehospital pain. On a later stage, more analgesic methods are often available. PreMeFen is a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing three analgesic regimens aiming to establish whether inhalation of methoxyflurane or intranasal fentanyl is as good as IV morphine for fast reduction of acute pain in the prehospital setting.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Humanos , Fentanila , Morfina , Metoxiflurano , Hospitais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
11.
BMC Emerg Med ; 23(1): 100, 2023 08 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37649004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Low-dose analgesic methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) was approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate to severe pain in conscious adults with trauma in 2015. A comparative post-authorisation safety study (PASS) was conducted to assess the risk of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity with methoxyflurane during routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a comparative hybrid prospective-retrospective cohort study. The comparative cohorts consisted of adults who were given methoxyflurane (methoxyflurane cohort) or another analgesic (concurrent cohort) routinely used for moderate to severe trauma and associated pain in the emergency setting (ambulance and Emergency Department) in the UK between December 2016 and November 2018. Hepatic and renal events were captured in the ensuing 12 weeks. A blinded clinical adjudication committee assessed events. A historical comparator cohort (non-concurrent cohort) was identified from patients with fractures in the English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) accident and emergency database from November 2013 and November 2015 (before commercial launch of methoxyflurane). Hepatic and renal events were captured in the ensuing 12 weeks via linkage with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and HES hospital admissions databases. RESULTS: Overall, 1,236, 1,101 and 45,112 patients were analysed in the methoxyflurane, concurrent and non-concurrent comparator cohorts respectively. There was no significant difference in hepatic events between the methoxyflurane and concurrent cohorts (1.9% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.079) or between the methoxyflurane and non-concurrent cohorts (1.9% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.192). Renal events were significantly less common in the methoxyflurane cohort than in the concurrent cohort (2.3% vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001). For methoxyflurane versus non-concurrent cohort the lower occurrence of renal events (2.3% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.070) was not statistically significant. Multivariable adjustment did not change these associations. CONCLUSIONS: Methoxyflurane administration was not associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity compared with other routinely administered analgesics and was associated with a reduced risk of nephrotoxicity compared with other routinely administered analgesics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study registered in the EU PAS Register (ENCEPP/SDPP/13040).


Assuntos
Analgesia , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Nefropatias , Metoxiflurano , Metoxiflurano/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Analgesia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Emergências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/epidemiologia , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Risco , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Incidência
12.
Lancet Planet Health ; 7(7): e622-e629, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438003

RESUMO

There is increasing concern within the health-care community about the role care delivery plays in environmental degradation, sparking research into how to reduce pollution from clinical practice. Inhaled anaesthetics is a particular research area of interest for two reasons. First, several gases are potent greenhouse gases, and waste gas is mostly emitted directly to the environment. Second, there are options to reduce gas waste and substitute medications and procedures with fewer embodied emissions while delivering high-quality care. Performance improvements are contingent on a proper understanding of the emission estimates and climate metrics used to ensure consistent application in guiding mitigation strategies and accounting at various scales. We review the current literature on the environmental impact and the estimation of the potential climate forcing of common inhaled anaesthetic drugs: desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, methoxyflurane, and nitrous oxide.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios , Isoflurano , Clima , Metoxiflurano , Sevoflurano , Gases
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37372694

RESUMO

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to overcrowding in many emergency departments (EDs). The present single-center, prospective, interventional study (conducted at Bichat University Medical Center (Paris, France)) was designed to assess the impact of self-administered, inhaled, low-dose methoxyflurane on trauma pain in a pre-ED fast-track zone dedicated to the management of lower-acuity non-COVID-19 patients. In the first phase of the study, the control group consisted of patients with mild-to-moderate trauma pain, for whom the triage nurse initiated pain management (based on the World Health Organization (WHO)'s analgesic ladder). In the second phase, the intervention group consisted of similar patients who self-administered methoxyflurane as an adjuvant to the standard analgesic ladder. The primary endpoint was the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score (from 0 to 10) recorded at different time points during the patient's care (T0: arrival in the ED, T1: exit from the triage box, T2: in the radiology department, T3: clinical examination, and T4: discharge from the ED). The level of agreement between the NPRS and the WHO analgesic ladder was assessed by the calculation of Cohen's kappa. Pairwise comparisons of continuous variables were performed with Student's t-test or a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Changes over time in the NPRS were analyzed in an analysis of variance (with Scheffe's post hoc test if a pairwise comparison was significant) or a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis H test. In all, 268 and 252 patients were included in the control and intervention groups, respectively. The two groups had similar characteristics. The level of agreement between the NPRS score and the analgesic ladder was high in both the control and intervention groups (Cohen's kappa: 0.74 and 0.70, respectively). The NPRS score decreased significantly between T0 and T4 in both groups (p < 0.001), but the decrease between T2 and T4 was significantly greater in the intervention group (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients still in pain on discharge was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (p = 0.001). In conclusion, a combination of self-administered methoxyflurane and the WHO analgesic ladder improves pain management in the ED.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Anestésicos Inalatórios , COVID-19 , Autogestão , Humanos , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Manejo da Dor , Anestésicos Inalatórios/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico
14.
Emerg Med Australas ; 35(5): 786-791, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37127293

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of sublingual ketamine wafers administered by volunteer emergency medical technicians (EMTs) for pain management to patients in rural Western Australia (WA). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients older than 12 years who were attended by volunteer EMTs in Esperance, Lancelin and Kalbarri, WA and received analgesic medications from 2018 to 2021. Patients who received ketamine wafers with/without other analgesics were compared to (i) patients who received only oral paracetamol and (ii) patients who received inhalational methoxyflurane without ketamine wafers with/without paracetamol. RESULTS: The present study included 826 patients, among whom 149 patients received ketamine wafer with/without other analgesics, 82 paracetamol only and 595 methoxyflurane with/without paracetamol. Patients who received ketamine wafers were younger (median age 49 years vs 54 years for the paracetamol group vs 58 years for the methoxyflurane group), required a longer median transport interval (56 min vs 20 min vs 8 min), trauma-related (73% vs 35% vs 54%), and presented higher median initial pain score (9 vs 3 vs 8 out of 10) than those who received paracetamol and those who received methoxyflurane, respectively. Eight in the ketamine wafers group (5.4%) had a record of nausea/vomiting after the administration of ketamine wafers. CONCLUSIONS: Sublingual ketamine wafer was administered by volunteer EMTs without any evidence of major adverse events in rural WA and deemed useful as an additional pain management option when long transport to hospital was needed. No other symptoms that may be associated with the use of ketamine were recorded.


Assuntos
Auxiliares de Emergência , Ketamina , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ketamina/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Austrália Ocidental , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos
15.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(4): 232, 2023 Mar 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36961562

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Self-administered methoxyflurane, also known as Penthrox, at a sub-anesthetic dose is a short-term, fast-acting, and safe analgesic that may provide suitable pain relief for cancer patients. This review aims to compile the existing evidence on methoxyflurane and its efficacy in reducing pain during cancer-related procedures. METHODS: A literature search was conducted through OVID Medline and Embase. The search was limited to articles published between 2012 and 2021 and studies were included if they assessed the efficacy of methoxyflurane to reduce pain in cancer-related procedures. All types of cancer were included. RESULTS: The literature search yielded seven studies published between 2012 and 2021. The studies analyzed assessed methoxyflurane use in prostate biopsy, colonoscopy, removal of brachytherapy rods, and bone marrow biopsy. Various research designs were employed, including three randomized controlled trials, two prospective observational studies, one retrospective, and one non-randomized controlled trial. In all, methoxyflurane has a demonstrated ability to reduce pain in these procedures. CONCLUSION: In the limited studies available in evaluating the efficacy of methoxyflurane for reducing procedural pain during cancer-related procedures, all have demonstrated clinical equivalency or superiority. Pain relief appears to be equivalent however methoxyflurane overcomes the standard limitations of respiratory sedation and has demonstrated quicker procedural recovery times than traditional sedation methods. The accumulated data to date supports the use of methoxyflurane which can supplement or supplant current methods of analgesia in cancer-related procedures.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios , Dor do Câncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Anestésicos Inalatórios/uso terapêutico , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Dor do Câncer/etiologia , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados como Assunto
16.
Int Emerg Nurs ; 68: 101275, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36989874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methoxyflurane (MTX) is an inhalation agent that has several potential benefits for limiting various types of pain in ambulance care. AIM: To elucidate how ambulance nurses experience the characteristics of MTX in an ambulance care setting. METHOD: This cross-sectional study applied a mixed-methods approach, using a questionnaire together with complementary interviews. The questionnaire survey was analyzed using descriptive statistics (10-point Likert scale and question index values [Q-IV], range: 0-1.0). The interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis. Study results were reported following the STROBE statement. RESULTS: The ambulance nurses' overall general satisfaction with the MTX concept had a median of 7.0 (IQR 5-8), corresponding to a mean Q-IV of 0.84 (very good experience). The qualitative part was divided into three categories: sense of security, patient participation, and general usefulness. The results revealed varying experiences of usefulness, including pain-relieving effect and the possibility of patient participation. The perceived strong odor of MTX seemed to concern the ambulance nurses and their patients. CONCLUSION: In general, MTX was experienced as a safe and effective analgesic. However, the experiences of the overall usefulness varied, particularly since the product had a perceived strong odor. Increasing knowledge of using MTX, could likely increase the overall usefulness.


Assuntos
Ambulâncias , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Humanos , Manejo da Dor , Suécia , Metoxiflurano , Estudos Transversais , Dor
17.
Can J Urol ; 30(1): 11448-11452, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36779953

RESUMO

Penthrox is a portable handheld inhaler that delivers a low dose of methoxyflurane - an anesthetic with analgesic effects, rapid onset of action, and a favorable side-effect profile. It has been widely used for acute pain management in Australia for the past 40 years. Currently, it is approved for use in over 55 countries, including Canada. Prospective randomized studies highlight Penthrox analgesic effectiveness and safety profile for emergency, prehospital and outpatient settings. In addition, the use of multimodal analgesia, specifically Penthrox, can play an important role in the analgesic management of urological procedures, such as prostatic biopsies and office-based minimally invasive surgical therapies. Herein readers will familiarize themselves with Penthrox, significant studies, and technique used for outpatient urological procedures.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios , Urologia , Humanos , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Inalatórios/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Analgésicos
18.
Respir Med ; 207: 107119, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36642343

RESUMO

Pleural diseases are common and frequently result in disabling symptoms, impaired health-related quality of life and hospitalisation. Both diagnosis and management often require pleural procedures and despite a variety of pain control strategies available for clinicians to employ, many procedures are still complicated by pain and discomfort. This can interfere with procedure success and can limit patient satisfaction. This review examines the evidence for pain control strategies for people undergoing non-surgical pleural procedures. A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify published studies examining different pain control strategies including pharmacological (sedatives, paravertebral blocks, erector spinae blocks, intrapleural anaesthesia, epidural anaesthesia, local anaesthetic, methoxyflurane, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], opioids) and non-pharmacological measures (transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation [TENS], cold application and changes to the intervention or technique). Current literature is limited by heterogeneous study design, small participant numbers and use of different endpoints. Strategies that were more effective than placebo or standard care at improving pain included intrapleural local anaesthesia, paravertebral blocks, NSAIDs, small-bore intercostal catheters (ICC), cold application and TENS. Inhaled methoxyflurane, thoracic epidural anaesthesia and erector spinae blocks may also be useful approaches but require further evaluation to determine their roles in routine non-surgical pleural procedures. Future research should utilise reliable and repeatable study designs and reach consensus in endpoints to allow comparability between findings and thus provide the evidence-base to achieve standardisation of pain management approaches.


Assuntos
Manejo da Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Metoxiflurano , Dor , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico
19.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 105(S2): S22-S27, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35950512

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Methoxyflurane is an historical anaesthetic agent that has undergone a renaissance with the introduction of a smaller dose in a handheld 'Penthrox' device. The benefits of Penthrox include its ease of use, with disposable individual packets, and the need for less monitoring and staff, when compared with deeper sedation. The literature acknowledges its use for analgesia and in the management of anterior shoulder dislocation but in no other procedural orthopaedic circumstance. METHODS: Following institutional approval, we undertook a retrospective review of all incidences of Penthrox use to facilitate minor procedures within a 2-month period starting 24 March 2020. Time to procedure and success were recorded using the surrogate markers of patient attendance and x-Ray occurrence times. RESULTS: Some 101 Penthrox doses were given to 89 patients over 97 unique episodes between 24 March and 26 May 2020. No complications were recorded following the use of Penthrox during this period. Patient demographics were explored. Fracture manipulations and casting (n=54) had a 100% success rate in achieving adequate and safe reduction. Joint dislocations (n=34) were treated with varying success. Native elbow dislocations were reduced most successfully (4/4, 100%). Native shoulder dislocations were seen in 17 patients and successful relocation was seen in 11 cases, giving a success rate of 65%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, outside anterior shoulder dislocations, to report on the efficacy of Penthrox within emergent orthopaedic scenarios. We have demonstrated Penthrox to be a safe tool for helping to manage trauma procedures in the emergency department.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Inalatórios , Fraturas Ósseas , Luxações Articulares , Metoxiflurano , Metoxiflurano/administração & dosagem , Metoxiflurano/uso terapêutico , COVID-19 , Pandemias , Anestésicos Inalatórios/uso terapêutico , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Luxações Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxações Articulares/tratamento farmacológico , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Raios X , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Reino Unido
20.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(8): 987-992, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35895001

RESUMO

Background: Treatment of acute traumatic pain is a core task for mountain rescue services. Intravenous access, however, is often difficult, and the vast majority of missions are carried out without a physician at the scene. The spectrum of analgesics available for use by non-physician personnel is limited. Inhaled analgesics, such as methoxyflurane, might prove useful, but currently no data exist on their application by non-physicians in the alpine setting.Methods: This prospective observational alpine field study was conducted over a period of 15 months. Patients suffering traumatic injuries with moderate to severe pain (pain score ≥ 5) after downhill bike accidents in the Tyrol mountains (1,362 m to 2,666 m above sea level) were enrolled. Teams of four mountain rescue service members, one of them a trained EMT, treated the patients with 3 ml of methoxyflurane by inhaler. We measured efficacy as reduction in pain from baseline to 15 minutes after treatment on a numerical rating scale. Safety was assessed by change in vital signs or occurrence of side-effects. Sample-size calculations were based on the efficacy outcome and yielded a need for 20 patients at a power of 0.8.Results: From June 29, 2020 to September 30, 2021, a total of 20 patients (two females; mean age 37 years) were included. The mean initial pain score was 7.2 (SD 1.0) points. After 15 minutes, pain was significantly reduced by a mean of 2.9 (SD 1.4) points. No major adverse events or relevant changes in vital signs were observed.Conclusion: The use of methoxyflurane by EMTs during alpine rescue operations in our study proved to be safe and efficient. We observed no reduction in the efficacy of the inhaler device at moderate altitude.


Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Metoxiflurano/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Medição da Dor , Dor Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Aguda/diagnóstico , Analgésicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA