Assessment of intraocular lens tilt and decentration after femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgery at 12 months and beyond.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt following femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional surgery using swept-source anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (SS-ASOCT). METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, all patients underwent FLACS or conventional cataract surgery. Those with a minimum of 12-months follow-up since surgery were included. Patients with surgical complications were excluded. Demographics, preoperative ocular measurements (axial length, anterior chamber depth), and postoperative measurements [corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), autorefraction, keratometry, IOL type] were collected. Postoperative IOL tilt and decentration were compared using SS-ASOCT between patients with FLACS and conventional cataract surgery. Subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze tilt and decentration by haptic type (single-piece vs. three-piece). RESULTS: A total of 188 eyes were included [110 (58.5%) in the FLACS group and 78 (41.5%) in the conventional group]. No differences were observed between the FLACS and conventional groups regarding preoperative parameters. FLACS resulted in less IOL decentration compared to conventional cataract surgery (170 µm vs. 240 µm, p = 0.002). No statistically significant differences were observed between the FLACS and conventional groups in the magnitude and axis of IOL tilt. Both groups had a trend of IOL tilt toward the inferotemporal aspects. Moreover, no difference regarding postoperative CDVA, spherical equivalent, and keratometric astigmatism was observed. CONCLUSIONS: FLACS resulted in significantly better long-term IOL centration than conventional surgery with manual capsulotomy. No significant difference in IOL tilt or postoperative CDVA was observed between FLACS and conventional cataract surgery.

Outcomes of retropupillary iris claw lens implantation in patients with intraocular lens dislocation and low (less than 1000 cells/mm2) corneal endothelial cell density.

BACKGROUND: Posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation is a common complication of cataract surgery. Dislocated IOLs often require surgical intervention due to the potentially severe risks of leaving this condition untreated. If a patient with extremely low corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) presents with IOL dislocation, the surgeon faces a crucial dilemma of choosing the most optimal surgical treatment option. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (R-IOL) implantation in patients with IOL dislocation and extremely low (< 1000 cells/mm2) ECD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of nine patients (all men) whose pre-operative ECD was < 1000 cells/mm2 and who underwent R-IOL implantation due to intraocular subluxation or total dislocation into the vitreous cavity between 2014 and 2020. We evaluated corneal endothelial function and visual outcomes after surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this study. The mean age at diagnosis was 64.89 ± 7.15 years (range 57-76 years), and the follow-up duration was 37.93 ± 23.72 months (range 18.07-89.07 months). No patients developed bullous keratopathy during follow-up. Compared to the initial ECD, corneal thickness (CT), coefficient variation of cell area (CV) and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX), there was no statistically significant decrease in the ECD, CV, and HEX at last follow-up (P = 0.944, 0.778, 0.445, 0.443). There was significant improvement in the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at the last follow-up (average 0.13 logMAR, 20/27 Snellen) compared to the pre-operative mean UDVA (average 1.09 logMAR, 20/250 Snellen) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: R-IOL implantation did not result in a statistically significant decline in corneal endothelial function in patients with preoperatively low ECD, and it significantly improved the mean UDVA postoperatively. R-IOL implantation appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for intraocular lens dislocation in patients with low ECD (< 1000 cells/mm²); however, long-term follow-up studies are warranted to corroborate these findings.

Postoperative Visual Function of Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Versus Monofocal Lenses.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt, as well as age, on postoperative visual function (corrected distance visual acuity [CDVA] and contrast sensitivity) by comparing an extended depth-of-focus IOL using higher order aspheric optics against a monofocal IOL from the same platform. METHODS: This retrospective observational study targeted patients without other eye diseases who underwent surgery to implant the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue or the monofocal IOL Tecnis OptiBlue 1-Piece (J&J Vision) during cataract surgery from November 2021 to December 2022. The effects of age, axial length, IOL decentration, tilt, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) on the postoperative 5 m CDVA and area under log contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF) under photopic and scotopic conditions were evaluated within 3 months of surgery. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in postoperative CDVA between the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue group (n = 61 eyes) and the Tecnis OptiBlue 1-Piece group (n = 35 eyes), but AULCSF was significantly better in the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue group for photopic (1.58 ± 0.13 vs 1.46 ± 0.18; P = .002) and scotopic (1.71 ± 0.11 vs 1.59 ± 0.19; P = .002) eyes. Multivariate analysis showed a negative correlation between AULCSF and IOL decentration and age in the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue group (P < .01), with no significant correlation with tilt, axial length, and corneal HOAs. CONCLUSIONS: The Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue yielded significantly better contrast sensitivity under photopic and scotopic conditions than the Tecnis OptiBlue 1-Piece. However, it is important to consider the effects of IOL decentration and age when evaluating the contrast sensitivity of the Tecnis Eyhance OptiBlue. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e499-e505.].

Influence of Ocular Biometric Parameters on Intraocular Lens Position: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of ocular biometric parameters on intraocular lens (IOL) tilt and decentration after cataract surgery. METHODS: Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were screened for inclusion in this prospective cohort study. Tilt and decentration of the crystalline lens and IOL were measured using the CASIA2 (Tomey). Anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were preoperatively measured by the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of ocular biometric parameters on IOL tilt and decentration after cataract surgery. RESULTS: In total, 191 eyes of 120 patients were included. Age was positively correlated with IOL tilt, whereas ACD and AL were negatively correlated with IOL tilt. A strong positive correlation was found between preoperative crystalline lenses and postoperative IOLs in tilt magnitude (r = 0.769, P < .001) and tilt direction (r = 0.688, P < .001). A positive correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative lens decentration magnitude and decentration direction. Greater postoperative IOL tilt and decentration were significantly associated with greater preoperative crystalline lens tilt (P < .001) and decentration (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: IOL tilt was greater in older patients. Shorter AL and shallower ACD contributed to greater IOL tilt. The tilt and decentration of the IOL will be greater in patients with greater tilt and decentration of the crystalline lens. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e438-e444.].

Intraocular lens tilt and decentration after primary and delayed implantation in phacovitrectomy for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tilt and decentration of intraocular lenses (IOLs) in eyes that underwent phacovitrectomy for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 63 patients with macula-off RRD who underwent phacovitrectomy were enrolled and divided into a primary implantation group (group A) and a delayed implantation group (group B) according to the time of IOL implantation. Routine ocular examinations, including optometry, were performed, and the IOL tilt and decentration were measured. Postoperative refractive prediction error and IOL tilt and decentration were compared between the two groups, and the relevant factors of IOL positions were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean spherical refractive prediction error (MSE) was - 0.53 ± 0.39 D in group A and - 0.09 ± 0.55 in group B. The mean absolute spherical refractive prediction error (MASE) was 0.61 ± 0.23 D in group A and 0.50 ± 0.22 D in group B. The difference in MSE ( t = -3.623, P < 0.05) but not in MASE (t = 1.866, P = 0.067) between the two groups was significant. The mean IOL tilt and mean decentration were 8.54° ±3.65° and 0.55 ± 0.18 mm in group A and 10.62° ±3.29° and 0.66 ± 0.14 mm, respectively, in Group B. Differences in tilt ( t = -2.373, P < 0.05) and decentration ( t = -2.698, P < 0.05) between the two groups were both significant. In group B, the mean time interval between phacovitrectomy and IOL implantation (T V-I ) was 25.2 ± 6.9 weeks, and the absolute values of both IOL tilt and decentration were positively correlated with T V-I . CONCLUSION: In phacovitrectomy for macula-off RRD repair, primary IOL implantation leads to a postoperative myopic shift, while delayed IOL implantation may cause greater IOL tilt and decentration.

Capsular Tension Ring Implantation for Intraocular Lens Decentration and Tilt in Highly Myopic Eyes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Capsular tension rings (CTRs) can support weak zonules and inhibit capsular shrinkage, thus potentially reducing intraocular lens (IOL) decentration and tilt. However, it has been debated whether CTRs can reduce IOL decentration and tilt in highly myopic eyes and whether CTR implantation is necessary for all highly myopic eyes. Objective: To evaluate the influence of CTR implantation on IOL decentration and tilt in highly myopic eyes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted between November 2021 and September 2023 at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. Patients with cataract and an axial length (AL) of 26 mm or longer were enrolled. Interventions: Participants were stratified into 3 groups based on the AL (stratum 1, 26 mm ≤ AL <28 mm; stratum 2, 28 mm ≤ AL <30mm; stratum 3, AL ≥30 mm), and further randomly assigned to the CTR group (a C-loop IOL combined with a CTR) or the control group (only a C-loop IOL) within each stratum. Main Outcomes and Measures: IOL decentration at 3 months after cataract surgery was evaluated using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Results: A total of 186 eyes of 186 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.3 [10.9] years; 118 female [63.4%]) were randomized into the CTR group (93 [50%]) or control group (93 [50%]), with 87 eyes (93.6%) and 92 eyes (98.9%) completing follow-up at 3 months, respectively. The CTR group showed smaller IOL decentration (0.19 mm vs 0.23 mm; difference, -0.04 mm; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01 mm; P = .02) and tilt at 3 months, and lower proportions of clinically significant IOL decentration (≥0.4 mm) and tilt (≥7°) at 3 months compared with the control group. Similar results were only found in eyes with an AL of 30 mm or longer (IOL decentration: 0.20 mm vs 0.28 mm; difference, -0.08 mm; 95% CI, -0.14 to -0.02 mm; P = .01). Additionally, the CTR group showed a smaller change in IOL decentration from 1 week to 3 months, higher prediction accuracy, and better visual quality and patient satisfaction in this stratum. No differences were observed between the CTR and control groups in eyes with an AL less than 30 mm. Conclusions and Relevance: CTR implantation reduced C-loop IOL decentration and tilt, increased position stability, and improved visual quality in eyes with an AL of 30 mm or longer. These findings support use of CTR implantation in eyes with an AL of 30 mm or longer and implanted with C-loop IOLs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05161520.

Rotational stability of toric intraocular lenses by lens model and haptic design: systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Rotational stability is key for optimizing postoperative visual outcomes because even a small degree of rotation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL) from its target axis can result in a significant reduction in astigmatic correction. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the rotational stability of toric IOLs of different lens models and haptic designs. All published studies and clinical trials that investigate postoperative rotation of toric IOLs were searched and evaluated. Quality of studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies scale. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed in R4.3.1 software with subgroup analysis performed based on lens model and haptic design. 51 published studies of 4863 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean absolute rotation of all toric IOLs was 2.36 degrees (95% CI, 2.08-2.64). Postoperative rotation is dependent on many aspects of lens material and design. Modern commercially available toric IOLs exhibit exceptional rotational stability.

Effect of decentration and tilt on the in vitro optical quality of monofocal and trifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the effect of decentration and tilt on the optical quality of monofocal and trifocal intraocular lenses (IOL). METHODS: Optical quality of a monofocal IOL (AcrySof IQ SN60WF; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., USA) and a trifocal IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., USA) was assessed using an in vitro optical bench (OptiSpheric IOL R&D; Trioptics GmbH, Germany). At apertures of 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm, modulation transfer function (MTF) at spatial frequency of 50 lp/mm, MTF curve and the United States Air Force (USAF) resolution test chart of the two IOLs were measured and compared at their focus with different degrees of decentration and tilt. Optical quality at infinity, 60 cm and 40 cm and the through-focus MTF curves were compared when the two IOLs were centered at apertures of 3.0 mm and 4.5 mm. Spectral transmittance of the two IOLs was measured by the UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV 3300 PC; MAPADA, China). RESULTS: The SN60WF and the PanOptix filtered blue light from 400 to 500 nm. Both IOLs at the far focus and the PanOptix at the intermediate focus showed a decrease in optical quality with increasing decentration and tilt. The PanOptix demonstrated enhanced optical quality compared to the previous gradient at the near focus at a decentration range of 0.3-0.7 mm with a 3.0 mm aperture, and 0.5 mm with a 4.5 mm aperture, whereas other conditions exhibited diminished optical quality with increasing decentration and tilt at the focus of both IOLs. When the two IOLs were centered, the SN60WF had better optical quality at infinity, while the PanOptix had better optical quality at 60 cm and 40 cm defocus. The optical quality of the SN60WF exceeded that of the PanOptix at far focus, with a 3 mm aperture decentration up to 0.7 mm and a 4.5 mm aperture decentration up to 0.3 mm; this observation held true for all tilts, irrespective of aperture size. As both decentration and tilt increased, the optical quality of the SN60WF deteriorated more rapidly than that of the PanOptix at the far focal point. CONCLUSIONS: The SN60WF showed a decrease in optical quality with increasing decentration and tilt. Optical quality of the PanOptix at the near focus increased in some decentration conditions and decreased in some conditions, while it showed a decrease at the other focuses with increasing decentration. While tilt only had a negative effect on optical quality. When both IOLs were centered, the PanOptix provided a wider range of vision, while the SN60WF provided better far distance vision. At the far focus, the SN60WF has better resistance to tilt than the PanOptix, but the optical quality degrades more quickly when decentered and tilted.

Observation on the tilt and decentration of multifocal intraocular lens with optic capture in Berger space for pediatric cataract.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to observe the tilt and decentration of multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with optic capture in Berger space within 2 years after pediatric cataract surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. The implantation of multifocal IOL (Tecnis ZMB00) with optic capture in Berger space was performed on 33 patients (48 eyes) with pediatric cataract at Qingdao Eye Hospital. Tilt and decentration of IOL was measured using Scheimpflug system (Pentacam) at 1 month and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: All the multifocal IOLs were successfully implanted in Berger space with optic capture and no visually significant complications were detected during the follow-up. The mean tilt of IOLs was 2.779° ± 0.950° in the vertical plane and 2.399° ± 0.898° in the horizontal plane at 1 month postoperatively, and the mean length of the decentration was 0.207 ± 0.081 mm in vertical plane and 0.211 ± 0.090 mm in the horizontal plane. Compared with 1 month after surgery, the angle of tilt decreased by a mean of 0.192° and decentration increased by a mean of 0.014 mm at the vertical meridian at 2 years postoperatively (P = 0.37 and P = 0.27, respectively), meanwhile, tilt increased by 0.265° and decentration increased by 0.012 mm at the horizontal meridian (P = 0.11 and P = 0.22, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up results suggest the tilt and decentration of multifocal IOL implantation with optic capture in Berger space remain stable in an acceptable range within 2 years after cataract surgery in children above the age of 5. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qingdao Eye Hospital, and registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR identifier: 1900023155).

Tolerance to decentration of biaspheric intraocular lenses with refractive phase-ring extended depth of focus and diffractive trifocal designs.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the in vitro tolerance to decentration of biaspheric intraocular lens (IOLs) with refractive phase-ring extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) and diffractive trifocal designs. METHODS: This experimental study was carried out at the Department of Optics and Optometry and Vision Science, University of Valencia, Spain. The modulation transfer function (MTF) of the ETLIO130C EDOF and the TFLIO130C trifocal IOLs (AST Products Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) were determined at different levels of decentration for a given wavelength and pupil diameter using the PMTF optical bench (Lambda-X Ophthalmics, Nivelles, Belgium). The modulation transfer function (MTF) curves, the through-focus MTF curves, and the Strehl ratios were measured at 3-mm pupil aperture for 0.25-, 0.50- and 0.75-mm decentration. RESULTS: The optical design of the trifocal TFLIO130C IOL is robust to small decentrations, with virtually no change in MTF response for 0.25 mm decentration. For greater decentration levels, the MTF response is slightly reduced with increasing decentration. The ETLIO130C EDOF design is robust to decentration, as the MTF response is only minimally affected when increasing the decentration up to 0.75 mm. CONCLUSIONS: MTF responses are slightly reduced with greater levels of decentration, but the range of focus provided by both trifocal and EDOF designs are preserved. The effects for average levels of decentration reported in the literature are minimum for both IOL designs.

Predicting intraocular lens tilt using a machine learning concept.

PURPOSE: To use a combination of partial least squares regression and a machine learning approach to predict intraocular lens (IOL) tilt using preoperative biometry data. SETTING: Kepler University Clinic Linz, Linz, Austria. DESIGN: Prospective single-center study. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography, autorefraction, and subjective refraction were performed at baseline and 8 weeks after cataract surgery. In analysis I, only 1 eye per patient was included and a tilt prediction model was generated. In analysis II, a pairwise comparison between right and left eyes was performed. RESULTS: In analysis I, 50 eyes of 50 patients were analyzed. Difference in amount, orientation, and vector from preoperative to postoperative lens tilt was -0.13 degrees, 2.14 degrees, and 1.20 degrees, respectively. A high predictive power (variable importance for projection [VIP]) for postoperative tilt prediction was found for preoperative tilt (VIP = 2.2), pupil decentration (VIP = 1.5), lens thickness (VIP = 1.1), axial eye length (VIP = 0.9), and preoperative lens decentration (VIP = 0.8). These variables were applied to a machine learning algorithm resulting in an out of bag score of 0.92 degrees. In analysis II, 76 eyes of 38 patients were included. The difference of preoperative to postoperative IOL tilt of right and left eyes of the same individual was statistically relevant. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative IOL tilt showed excellent predictability using preoperative biometry data and a combination of partial least squares regression and a machine learning algorithm. Preoperative lens tilt, pupil decentration, lens thickness, axial eye length, and preoperative lens decentration were found to be the most relevant parameters for this prediction model.

Severe Spontaneous Tilt of Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lenses.

PURPOSE: To report and evaluate a multicenter series of 18 cases of severe, spontaneous IOL tilt involving the flanged intrascleral haptic fixation technique (FISHF). DESIGN: Clinical study with historical controls. METHODS: We report a cross-sectional study of 46 FISHF cases using the CT Lucia 602 IOL at a single academic center over a period of 24 weeks to determine the incidence of severe rotisserie-style rotational tilt. These rates were then compared with the same time-frame the prior year to help determine if this is a new phenomenon. Additional cases of severe tilt were solicited from another 4 academic centers. RESULTS: Among 46 FISHF cases at a single center, 5 developed severe tilt. No clear pattern in surgical technique, ocular history, or ocular anatomy was evident in these cases compared with controls, although the involved IOLs clustered within a narrow diopter range, indicative of a batch effect. In the same 24-week interval the year before, 33 FISHF cases were performed, none of which exhibited severe rotational tilt. In our multicenter dataset, 18 cases of tilt were identified. Surgeons included fellow and early-career physicians as well as surgeons with multiple years of experience with the Yamane technique. A variety of surgical approaches for FISHF were represented. In at least 8 of the cases, haptic rotation and/or dehiscence at the optic-haptic junction were documented. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of haptic rotation and dehiscence intraoperatively in several cases may reflect a new stability issue involving the optic-haptic junction.

Intraocular lens tilt and decentration in secondary ciliary sulcus implantation in paediatric eyes: A 3-year prospective study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the tilt and decentration of one-piece anti-vaulting haptic intraocular lenses (IOL) and three-piece C-loop haptic IOLs in paediatric eyes undergoing secondary IOL implantation into the ciliary sulcus. METHODS: Paediatric aphakic patients receiving either one-piece anti-vaulting haptic or three-piece C-loop haptic IOL implants into the ciliary sulcus were enrolled in this prospective non-randomized interventional study and followed up for 3 years. IOL decentration and tilt were measured using Scheimpflug images. Preoperative and postoperative information, including demographic data and ocular biometric parameters and complications, were collected and analysed. RESULTS: Among 123 eyes of 79 paediatric patients, there were 72 eyes (58.54%) in the anti-vaulting haptic IOL group and 51 eyes (41.46%) in the C-loop haptic group. The anti-vaulting haptic IOL group had a lower incidence of clinically significant vertical IOL decentration than the C-loop haptic IOL group (23.88% vs. 43.14%, p = 0.037). No intergroup differences were observed in vertical or horizontal tilt or in horizontal decentration (all p > 0.05). One-piece anti-vaulting haptic IOL implantation was associated with a lower risk of clinically significant vertical decentration than three-piece C-loop haptic IOL implantation (odds ratio: 0.42, p = 0.037). There was a higher incidence of IOL dislocation in the C-loop haptic IOL group (15.22% vs. 4.17%, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: In paediatric aphakic eyes undergoing secondary IOL implantation into the ciliary sulcus, one-piece anti-vaulting haptic IOLs can reduce the risk of clinically significant vertical IOL decentration compared with three-piece C-loop haptic IOLs and may favour long-term IOL positional stability.

Comparison of intraocular lens tilt after capsular sutured scleral fixation with capsular segments versus uneventful cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare intraocular lens (IOL) tilt between uneventful phacoemulsification with in-the-bag IOL implantation and sutured scleral fixation (SSF) of the lens bag with a capsular tension segment (type 6 D / Morcher) using a Sheimpflug camera. SETTING: Clinical Practice, Hospital. Barcelona and A Coruña, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative multicenter study. METHODS: IOL tilt was compared between patients who underwent sutured scleral fixation with a capsular tension segment in a single eye (SSF group, n = 15) with patients who underwent uneventful IOL implantation (control group, n = 12) that were matched by biometric measurements. Post-operative refractive accuracy of biometric formulas by means of mean absolute error (MAE) was also reported. All patients underwent a general ophthalmic evaluation, anterior segment photography, and postoperative optical biometry (Zeiss IOLMaster® 500). In addition, IOL tilt was measured with a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam R, Oculus Optikgerate Gmbh). RESULTS: Mean vertical tilt was similar in both groups (2.20+/-2.47° SSF vs 1.97 +/- 1.79° control; p = 0.836) but mean horizontal tilt tended to higher values in the SSF series (2.09 +/- 2.74° vs 0.94 +/- 1.17°; p = 0.139). Considering post-operative refractive error in diopters by MAE calculations, there was an underestimation of IOL power in the SSF group which was only statistically significant for Barrett Universal II (1.07 vs 0.32; p = 0.028) and Hill-RBF (0.95 vs 0.26; p = 0.024) formulas, but not for SRK/T (0.99 vs 0.42; p = 0.285) and Kane (0.96 vs 0.33; p = 0.083). CONCLUSION: Sutured scleral fixation of capsular tension segments in the presence of zonular instability does not seem to induce clinically significant IOL tilt compared to uneventful cataract extraction cases.

Effect of misalignment at different orientations associated with angle κ on optical performance of aspheric intraocular lenses with different surface designs.

Intraocular lens (IOL) misalignment and angle κ have had significant negative impact on post-operative quality of vision. ZEMAX software has been used to imitate the optical performance of pseudophakic eyes with different IOL surface designs at different orientations of IOL misalignment (decentration of 0.4 mm and tilt of 7°, and with the existence of 0.5 mm angle κ). We found that an aspheric balanced curve optic surface maintained better optical performance via inducing less coma aberration. Coma aberration played an unexpectedly important role in the optical performance. With angle κ, the impact of IOL misalignment on visual quality was associated with the orientation of decentration and tilt, indicating that the coma compensation also took effect in pseudophakic eyes. Due to the high incidence of post-operative IOL misalignment, our results provide evidence of the importance of considering personalized angle κ before cataract surgery for patients.

Rotational Stability, Tilt and Decentration of a New IOL with a 7.0 mm Optic.

Purpose: To evaluate rotational stability, tilt and decentration of a new monofocal IOL with a 7.0 mm optic and frame haptics.Methods: Prospective post-market clinical follow-up study at the Kepler University Hospital Linz, Austria. An Aspira-aXA (HumanOptics, Germany) was implanted in 74 eyes of 42 cataract patients. The lens was manufactured with toric markings. IOL rotational stability was evaluated by comparing its position at the end of surgery (EoS) versus 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 4 months postoperatively. IOL tilt and decentration were measured using a Scheimpflug camera at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months.Results: Median absolute IOL rotation was 1.42 degrees (n = 52; mean = 2.18 ± 2.23°) within 1 day after surgery and was significantly higher compared to all later intervals (median <1.0 degree; P = .001). At the 4 months follow-up, IOL rotation was within 5.0 degrees in 85% of the eyes (n = 40) and within 10.0 degrees in 98% (n = 46) of the eyes. The only eye with an IOL rotation of ≥ 10.ty0 degrees (EoS vs. 1 day) had an AL of 26.45 mm. At the last follow-up, the IOL vertical and horizontal tilt referenced to the pupillary axis was in average less than 1.5 degrees in both eyes (n = 54; maximum 5.85°). Decentration in both meridians was on average less than 0.10 mm in both eyes (maximum 0.30 mm).Conclusion: The one-piece Aspira-aXA IOL showed good and stable positioning within the capsular bag over a 4 months period.

Stability and Visual Outcomes of the Capsulotomy-Fixated FEMTIS-IOL After Automated Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Anterior Capsulotomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate stability and performance of a new monofocal anterior capsulotomy-fixated intraocular lens (IOL) (FEMTIS; Teleon Surgical B.V., Spankeren, Netherlands) after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, interventional, noncomparative case series. METHODS: FLACS with FEMTIS IOL was performed in 336 eyes of 183 cataract patients with fixation of the IOL to the anterior capsulotomy followed up for 12 months. Examination included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected visual acuity (CDVA), subjective refraction, IOL centration, posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and investigators' satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: At 12 months, mean IOL rotation was 1.50 ± 1.76 degrees and decentration 0.14 ± 0.14 mm from baseline (day of surgery). Mean horizontal IOL tilt was 0.70 ± 0.60 degrees and vertical 1.15 ± 1.06 degrees relative to the baseline (crystalline lens). Mean distance between IOL and iris was 0.32 mm to 0.36 mm for all measured meridians. Mean UDVA was 0.12 ± 0.14 logMAR (range -0.20 to 0.54 logMAR), mean CDVA -0.01 ± 0.09 logMAR (range -0.30 to 0.20 logMAR). Mean spherical equivalent was 0.35 ± 0.53 diopter (D) and 98% of eyes (n = 235) were within ±1.0 D. Median PCO score was 1 with an Nd:YAG laser rate of 3.1% after 12 months. Most surgeons were very satisfied (median score: 1) with surgery and implanted IOL. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of FEMTIS IOL provided excellent visual and stable refractive outcomes. IOL decentration was very low compared to other published studies and showed an exceptional high in-the-bag stability over a 12-month period. This lens benefits from femtosecond laser capsulotomies. It can be positioned very predictably and offers an optimal platform for toric and multifocal IOL optics.

Refractive and Visual Outcome of Misaligned Toric Intraocular Lens After Operative Realignment.

PURPOSE: The study was performed to evaluate the refractive and visual outcome of patients with misaligned toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) after operative realignment, with and without back-calculation of the toric axis after implantation of the IOL. DESIGN: Institutional, retrospective case-control study. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of 39 patients who underwent a second operation to realign a misaligned toric IOL from August 2013 to December 2019 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Ideal toric axis was calculated using the back-calculator astigmatismfix.com. RESULTS: The study consists of 39 treated eyes (20 [51%] right eyes). The toric IOLs showed a postoperative misalignment of 25.69 ± 26.06°. Postrotational, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) improved from 0.39 ± 0.29 logMAR to 0.27 ± 0.18 logMAR. Refractive outcome showed a reduction of residual sphere and cylinder. The postoperative UDVA when performing alignment to the preoperative calculated axis (51%) was 0.24 ± 0.16 logMAR with a cylinder of 0.90 ± 0.90 diopter (D). In the group with alignment to a back-calculated axis (49%), the UDVA was 0.32 ± 0.20 logMAR with a cylinder of 0.76 ± 0.72 D. High cylinder power IOLs (≥2 D) showed a higher decrease in residual cylinder when back-calculation was performed than low cylinder power IOLs (<2 D) (27% vs 9%). The mean spherical equivalent prediction error of the back-calculator was 0.54 ± 0.55 D. CONCLUSION: Realignment of misaligned toric IOLs improves visual acuity and reduces residual refractive errors. Especially for high cylinder power IOLs, better refractive outcome can be seen when performing a back-calculation before realignment.

The Aravind Pseudoexfoliation Study: 5-Year Postoperative Results. The Effect of Intraocular Lens Choice and Capsular Tension Rings.

PURPOSE: We compared rates of intraocular lens (IOL) decentration, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and visual acuity (VA) in eyes with and without pseudoexfoliation (PEX) 5 years after undergoing cataract surgery. DESIGN: Prospective comparative interventional study. METHODS: This multicenter study population included 1 eye of both 930 cataract patients with and 470 cataract patients without uncomplicated PEX (no small pupils or phacodonesis) all undergoing phacoemulsification by experienced Aravind Eye Care System surgeons. Eyes were randomized to either 1- or 3-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs). PEX eyes were also randomized to either receive or not receive a capsule tension ring. The main outcome measures included IOL decentration and PCO. Secondary outcomes included postoperative best-corrected VA. RESULTS: Follow-up was 86.2% in the PEX group and 86.7% in the control group at 5 years. The PEX group was older (P < .001) and had more men (P = .01). IOL decentration at 5 years was equally prevalent in PEX and control eyes (1.0% vs 1.1%, respectively, P = .8). Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet posterior capsulotomy rates for PCO were similar in the PEX group when compared with control subejcts (5.3% compared with 3.2%, respectively, P = .07). Best corrected VA was better at baseline and years 2 and 3 in the control group (P = .0001, P = .0005, and P = .02); however, there was no difference in BCVA at years 1, 4, and 5 between the PEX and control groups (P = .09, P = .29, and P = .5). CONCLUSION: In a large-scale, long-term, prospective comparative study of cataract surgery in eyes with uncomplicated PEX, the risks of IOL decentration and PCO were low and comparable to that in control subjects. When approaching cataract surgery in eyes with relatively uncomplicated PEX, neither IOL choice (1- vs 3-piece acrylic IOL) nor the presence/absence of a capsule tension ring affects outcomes at 5 years.