It's not you, it's the design - common problems with patient monitoring reported by anesthesiologists: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patient monitoring is critical for perioperative patient safety as anesthesiologists routinely make crucial therapeutic decisions from the information displayed on patient monitors. Previous research has shown that today's patient monitoring has room for improvement in areas such as information overload and alarm fatigue. The rationale of this study was to learn more about the problems anesthesiologists face in patient monitoring and to derive improvement suggestions for next-generation patient monitors. METHODS: We conducted a two-center qualitative/quantitative study. Initially, we interviewed 120 anesthesiologists (physicians and nurses) about the topic: common problems with patient monitoring in your daily work. Through deductive and inductive coding, we identified major topics and sub themes from the interviews. In a second step, a field survey, a separate group of 25 anesthesiologists rated their agree- or disagreement with central statements created for all identified major topics. RESULTS: We identified the following six main topics: 1. "Alarms," 2. "Artifacts," 3. "Software," 4. "Hardware," 5. "Human Factors," 6. "System Factors," and 17 sub themes. The central statements rated for the major topics were: 1. "problems with alarm settings complicate patient monitoring." (56% agreed) 2. "artifacts complicate the assessment of the situation." (64% agreed) 3. "information overload makes it difficult to get an overview quickly." (56% agreed) 4. "problems with cables complicate working with patient monitors." (92% agreed) 5. "factors related to human performance lead to critical information not being perceived." (88% agreed) 6. "Switching between monitors from different manufacturers is difficult." (88% agreed). The ratings of all statements differed significantly from neutral (all p < 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study provides an overview of the problems anesthesiologists face in patient monitoring. Some of the issues, to our knowledge, were not previously identified as common problems in patient monitoring, e.g., hardware problems (e.g., cable entanglement and worn connectors), human factor aspects (e.g., fatigue and distractions), and systemic factor aspects (e.g., insufficient standardization between manufacturers). An ideal monitor should transfer the relevant patient monitoring information as efficiently as possible, prevent false positive alarms, and use technologies designed to improve the problems in patient monitoring.

Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiology requires performing visually oriented procedures while monitoring auditory information about a patient's vital signs. A concern in operating room environments is the amount of competing information and the effects that divided attention has on patient monitoring, such as detecting auditory changes in arterial oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry. METHODS: The authors measured the impact of visual attentional load and auditory background noise on the ability of anesthesia residents to monitor the pulse oximeter auditory display in a laboratory setting. Accuracies and response times were recorded reflecting anesthesiologists' abilities to detect changes in oxygen saturation across three levels of visual attention in quiet and with noise. RESULTS: Results show that visual attentional load substantially affects the ability to detect changes in oxygen saturation concentrations conveyed by auditory cues signaling 99 and 98% saturation. These effects are compounded by auditory noise, up to a 17% decline in performance. These deficits are seen in the ability to accurately detect a change in oxygen saturation and in speed of response. CONCLUSIONS: Most anesthesia accidents are initiated by small errors that cascade into serious events. Lack of monitor vigilance and inattention are two of the more commonly cited factors. Reducing such errors is thus a priority for improving patient safety. Specifically, efforts to reduce distractors and decrease background noise should be considered during induction and emergence, periods of especially high risk, when anesthesiologists has to attend to many tasks and are thus susceptible to error.

Anesthesia awareness-induced posttraumatic stress disorder.

While the incidence of anesthesia awareness has been well documented, information related to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms resulting from anesthesia awareness is limited. Particularly scarce are descriptions of specific techniques to treat anesthesia awareness-induced PTSD. This article reviews an individual example of a woman who was experiencing anesthesia awareness-induced PTSD symptoms for 10 years. Treatment included supportive psychotherapy, psychoeducation, psychopharmacology, and group therapy with other individuals experiencing PTSD symptoms. Although this patient responded to these treatment approaches, additional studies are needed to identify optimal treatment options for patients with anesthesia awareness-induced PTSD.

Identifying the trigeminal nerve branches for transovale radiofrequency thermolesion: "no pain, no stress".

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency thermorhizotomy of the trigeminal nerve is a known treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Analysis of verbal responses to electric stimulation of the trigeminal rootlets has been the only method available to localize the affected branch, but patient discomfort may lead to unreliable verbal responses, resulting in increased morbidity or even therapeutic failure. Orthodromically elicited evoked potentials of the trigeminal nerve have also been used, but their application is tedious and results may vary. OBJECTIVE: To develop an electrophysiological method for intraoperative localization of the trigeminal nerve branches. METHODS: A series of 55 patients under general anesthesia during radiofrequency thermorhizotomy were studied. The trigeminal nerve root was stimulated through the foramen ovale with the RF electrode. Antidromic responses were recorded from the 3 divisions of the trigeminal nerve in the face. Effectiveness rate, pain relief, recurrence, complications, and patient comfort after the procedure were analyzed. RESULTS: Reproducible and easily obtained antidromic responses were clearly recorded in every subdivision of the trigeminal nerve in all patients. Ninety-four percent of patients experienced immediate pain relief after the procedure. The recurrence rate was 12.72%, and the surgical morbidity was 20%. CONCLUSION: This method proved to be useful to determine the exact localization of individual subdivisions of the trigeminal nerve in anesthetized patients, making this procedure safer and more comfortable for them.

Patient perception of combined awake brain tumor surgery and intraoperative 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging: the Kiel experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' perspective of combined awake craniotomy and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a prospective study. METHODS: We evaluated 25 consecutive patients prospectively. Qualitative and quantitative results were obtained by a psychologist via a structured interview 5 +/- 2 days postoperatively, supplemented by preoperative and postoperative assessment of the patients' mood with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, as well as parts of a structured clinical interview during the postoperative assessment. RESULTS: Satisfaction with the experience was high in almost all cases. Only 1 patient recalled experiencing considerable discomfort during the operation. About one-third (39%) of our sample described minor to moderate difficulties; the remaining were entirely satisfied. CONCLUSION: Although the combination of awake craniotomy and intraoperative MRI is demanding, it was both tolerable and reasonable for the patients. Our data confirm that intraoperative MRI appears to have no additional significant impact on the subjective patient perception, although it does prolong the procedure.

At-a-glance monitoring: covert observations of anesthesiologists in the operating room.

BACKGROUND: Patient monitoring displays are designed to improve patient safety, and yet little is known about how anesthesiologists interact with these displays. Previous studies of clinician behavior used an observer in the operating room, which may have altered behavior. We describe a covert observation technique to determine how often and for how long anesthesiologists actually look at the monitoring display during different segments of the maintenance phase of anesthesia, and to determine whether this changed with more than 1 anesthesia provider or during concomitant activities such as reading. METHODS: Five staff anesthesiologists, 2 anesthesia fellows, 3 anesthesia residents, and 2 medical students were covertly videotaped across 10 dual anesthesia provider cases and 10 solo cases. Videotapes were later segmented (5 minutes postinduction [early maintenance], mid-maintenance, and immediately before the drapes came down [late maintenance]) and coded for looking behavior at the patient monitor, anesthesia chart, and other reading material. RESULTS: Anesthesiologists looked at the monitor in 1- to 2-second glances, performed frequently throughout the 3 segments of maintenance anesthesia. Overall, the patient monitor was looked at only 5 of the analyzed time, which is less than has previously been reported. Monitoring behavior was constant across the segments of maintenance anesthesia and was not significantly affected by the number of anesthesia providers or role (trainee vs. senior). In contrast, charting behavior and other reading material viewing changed significantly over the analyzed segments of maintenance anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of "at-a-glance monitoring" has implications for the design of patient monitoring displays. Displays should be developed to optimize the information obtained from brief glances at the monitor.

Impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on surgery of high-grade gliomas.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists on the application of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) procedures during malignant glioma surgery. Because resection rate correlates with the survival rate, it is of paramount importance to determine these values. This study evaluates the impact of IOM on the resection rates, the survival rate, the quality of life, and the functional outcome of malignant gliomas. METHODS: Forty patients with a glioma were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with a glioma not adjacent to motor cortical areas operated without the use of IOM, and group 2, patients with a glioma adjacent to the central region operated under IOM. The further treatment was the same in both groups. The following parameters were analyzed: tumor resection rate, survival rate, preoperative and postoperative Karnowsky Performance Score, and preoperative and postoperative motor function. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the type of surgery performed or in the resection grade in both groups. No statistically significant difference was found in the median survival of the two groups in the Kaplan-Meier analysis with mean survival time 48.8 and 48.2 weeks. The mean Karnowsky Performance Score preoperative was 82.5 and 81.5, and 81.1 and 82.7 after 6 months, for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data presented here demonstrate that tumor resection is not negatively influenced by IOM. Accordingly, gliomas that are found to be otherwise resectable should not be excluded from aggressive management simply because of their vicinity to the motor cortex. Surgery should be performed under IOM.

Effects of intraoperative reading on vigilance and workload during anesthesia care in an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: During routine cases, anesthesia providers may divert their attention away from direct patient care to read clinical (e.g., medical records) and/or nonclinical materials. The authors sought to ascertain the incidence of intraoperative reading and measure its effects on clinicians' workload and vigilance. METHODS: In 172 selected general anesthetic cases in an academic medical center, a trained observer categorized the anesthesia provider's activities into 37 possible tasks. Vigilance was assessed by the response time to a randomly illuminated alarm light. Observer- and subject-reported workload were scored at random intervals. Data from Reading and Non-Reading Periods of the same cases were compared to each other and to matched cases that contained no observed reading. The cases were matched before data analysis on the basis of case complexity and anesthesia type. RESULTS: Reading was observed in 35% of cases. In these 60 cases, providers read during 25 +/- 3% of maintenance but not during induction or emergence. While Non-Reading Cases (n = 112) and Non-Reading Periods of Reading Cases did not differ in workload, vigilance, or task distribution, they both had significantly higher workload than Reading Periods. Vigilance was not different among the three groups. When reading, clinicians spent less time performing manual tasks, conversing with others, and recordkeeping. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia providers, even when being observed, read during a significant percentage of the maintenance period in many cases. However, reading occurred when workload was low and did not appear to affect a measure of vigilance.

Subthalamic stimulation for essential tremor. Short- and long-term results and critical target area.

BACKGROUND/AIMS/METHODS: In order to explore the usefulness and long-term result of subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation for the treatment of essential tremor (ET), we evaluated 3 groups of patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) for ET. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 3 patients who 9 years ago at intra-operative testing had good tremor reduction from STN stimulation. The second group consisted of 10 patients treated with DBS in the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus of the thalamus. The third group comprised 9 patients subjected to STN stimulation for ET with 1-3 years of follow-up. The 3 ET patients with STN stimulation in group 1 have continued to have excellent tremor reduction for up to 9 years. The second group, with Vim stimulation, showed less favourable long-term results. All of the recent STN stimulation group experienced good tremor reduction, but some of the patients above 70 years of age reported troublesome side effects. CONCLUSION: Provided that intra-operative test stimulation produces satisfactory tremor control, STN is a good target for long-term treatment of ET. For patients above the age of 70 years, however, the Vim is a preferable target.

Making monitoring 'work': human-machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia.

This study aimed to explore the use of electronic monitoring within the context of anaesthetic practice. We conducted workplace observation of, and interviews with, anaesthetists and other anaesthetic staff in two UK hospitals. Transcripts were analysed inductively for recurrent themes. Whilst formal sources of knowledge in anaesthesia deal with the issue of monitoring in terms of theoretical principles and performance specifications of devices, anaesthetists in practice often 'disbelieve' monitoring information. They call on and integrate other sources of knowledge about the patient, especially from their clinical assessment. The ability to distinguish 'normal' and 'abnormal' findings is vital. Confidence in electronic information varies with experience, as does the degree to which electronic information may be considered 'redundant'. We conclude that electronic monitoring brings new dimensions of understanding but also the potential for new ways of misunderstanding. The tacit knowledge underlying the safe use of monitoring deserves greater acknowledgement in training and practice.

Anaesthetists' attitudes towards awareness and depth-of-anaesthesia monitoring.

Advances in technology have resulted in the development of several depth-of-anaesthesia monitors. Whether any of these monitors can reduce the incidence of awareness is an important issue for anaesthetists and their patients. We therefore surveyed a random selection of anaesthetists, asking for their opinions of awareness and depth-of-anaesthesia monitoring in current clinical practice. Approximately half (52%) of the anaesthetists surveyed had experienced a patient with awareness. Anaesthetists considered that they had a lower incidence of awareness in their own practice when compared with others, 1:5000 vs. 1:10 000 (p < 0.001). Anaesthetists rated awareness on an 11-point scale as only a moderate problem, median (interquartile range) 5 (2-7). Older anaesthetists were less likely to rate the importance of awareness highly (p = 0.009) and to use awareness monitoring (p = 0.001). Anaesthetists are prepared to use depth-of-anaesthesia monitoring more widely if it can be shown to prevent most cases of awareness in routine practice.

Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography with a special focus on a patient undergoing advanced robotic-assisted procedures.

Intraoperative echocardiography (IOE) has earned a major role in surgical decision-making and helps the cardiac surgeon decide and proceed with appropriate intervention based on the visualized pathology. With the advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques and robotic-assisted operations, more emphasis and dependence has been placed on IOE. We describe our experience with IOE during mitral valve repair at our center, which is one of the pioneer centers for these telemanipulation techniques.

A measure of intraoperative attention to monitor displays.

Vigilance is an important but difficult to measure attribute in anesthesia practitioners. We present a modified standard method to assess intraoperative vigilance toward electronic data displays. The response time to detect a simulated abnormal value on the physiologic monitor was measured. Eight anesthesia residents were studied during 60 surgical procedures. Responses to 439 abnormal values were analyzed. The average response time was 61 +/- 61 s (mean +/- SD), and 56% of the detections were made within 60 s. However, 16% of the abnormal values were undetected during the 5 min that they were displayed. Response times and the rate of missed events were greater during induction of anesthesia (a time of high workload) than during the maintenance or emergence phases of anesthesia. Response times were shorter during procedures on ASA 1 patients than on ASA 3 patients. The results suggest that anesthesiologists usually quickly detect abnormal values on physiologic monitors and that less attention is devoted to monitors during periods of high workload.