Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 393
Filtrar
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(17)2024 Aug 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39273137

RESUMO

Chitosan-based biomaterials are being investigated for their unique properties that support skin regeneration and wound healing. This study focused on the preparation and characterization of a mupirocin (Mup)-loaded PEGylated chitosan (CS-PEG) nanoparticulate film (NF) [CBNF]. The CBNF was characterized using FTIR spectroscopy and SEM analysis. The results demonstrated that CBNF was successfully incorporated into the composites, as shown by functional group modification through FTIR analysis. Additionally, the SEM micrograph revealed the deposition of nanoparticles (<200 nm) on the surface of transparent CBNF. The film has higher water absorption (≥1700%) and moderate water retention ability within 6 h. Furthermore, histological findings showed significant development, with re-epithelialization and granulation of tissues after 19 days, indicating the healing efficiency of CNBF. These results suggest that drug-loaded films could be an effective carrier and delivery agent for Mup-like anti-inflammatory drugs.


Assuntos
Quitosana , Mupirocina , Nanopartículas , Polietilenoglicóis , Cicatrização , Quitosana/química , Mupirocina/química , Mupirocina/farmacologia , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Nanopartículas/química , Polietilenoglicóis/química , Animais , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Espectroscopia de Infravermelho com Transformada de Fourier
2.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 75, 2024 Jul 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992708

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSI) in orthopaedic surgery. The efficacy of decolonisation for S. aureus on reducing the risk of SSI is uncertain in this speciality. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a nasal screening strategy of S. aureus and targeted decolonisation on the risk of S. aureus SSI. METHODS: A retrospective pre-post and here-elsewhere study was conducted between January 2014 and June 2020 in 2 adult orthopaedic surgical sites (North and South) of a French university hospital. Decolonisation with Mupirocin and Chlorhexidine was conducted in S. aureus carriers starting February 2017 in the South site (intervention group). Scheduled surgical procedures for hip, knee arthroplasties, and osteosyntheses were included and monitored for one year. The rates of S. aureus SSI in the intervention group were compared to a historical control group (South site) and a North control group. The risk factors for S. aureus SSI were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 5,348 surgical procedures was included, 100 SSI of which 30 monomicrobial S. aureus SSI were identified. The preoperative screening result was available for 60% (1,382/2,305) of the intervention group patients. Among these screenings, 25.3% (349/1,382) were positive for S. aureus and the efficacy of the decolonisation was 91.6% (98/107). The rate of S. aureus SSI in the intervention group (0.3%, 7/2,305) was not significantly different from the historical control group (0.5%, 9/1926) but differed significantly from the North control group (1.3%, 14/1,117). After adjustment, the risk factors of S. aureus SSI occurrence were the body mass index (ORaper unit, 1.05; 95%CI, 1.0-1.1), the Charlson comorbidity index (ORaper point, 1.34; 95%CI, 1.0-1.8) and operative time (ORaper minute, 1.01; 95%CI, 1.00-1.02). Having benefited from S. aureus screening/decolonisation was a protective factor (ORa, 0.24; 95%CI, 0.08-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low number of SSI, nasal screening and targeted decolonisation of S. aureus were associated with a reduction in S. aureus SSI.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Clorexidina , Mupirocina , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Programas de Rastreamento , França
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 52(10): 1202-1208, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus is a proven strategy to reduce surgical site infections (SSI). Recently updated guidelines expanded nasal decolonization beyond traditionally high-risk populations to include the option for alcohol-based antiseptics (ABAs). We assessed the efficacy of a novel ABA for reducing SSI compared to mupirocin and iodophor. METHODS: A literature search in Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases was completed of studies reporting SSI outcomes in hospitals using an ABA. Primary meta-analyses were conducted to analyze ABA clinical efficacy versus no intervention (7 studies); subanalyses compared the ABA to mupirocin (3 studies) or iodophor (2 studies). RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven nasal decolonization titles for SSI prevention were identified, of which 7 were accepted. In the studies selected, 16,212 patients were included: 7,983 (49.24%) control group, and 8,129 (50.14%) intervention group. Significant effect sizes (measured as odds ratios [ORs]) and z-scores were found in all 3 meta-analyses: (OR = 3.178, z = 4.743, P < .001) in ABA clinical efficacy, (OR = 4.110, z = 3.167, P < .01) in ABA versus mupirocin, and (OR = 3.043, z = 3.155, P < .01) in ABA versus iodophor. Funnel plots for each demonstrated a lack of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant positive effects were identified in all 3 meta-analyses. An ABA appears to be a viable alternative to mupirocin or iodophors to reduce SSIs.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais , Iodóforos , Mupirocina , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Iodóforos/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento , Etanol/administração & dosagem , Administração Intranasal , Mucosa Nasal/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Nasal/microbiologia
4.
P R Health Sci J ; 43(2): 73-78, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38860960

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Increased mupirocin use leads to mupirocin resistance and is associated with persistence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers, prolonged hospitalization, and significant economic burdens for health systems. The study aimed to investigate the antimicrobial activity of compounds of Salvia rosmarinus L. ("rosemary", formerly Rosmarinus officinalis), alone or in combination with mupirocin, against multidrug resistant MRSA using isolates obtained from pediatric patients. METHODS: The in vitro antibacterial activity of the monoterpene α-pinene (α-Pi), a rosemary essential oil constituent, alone and in combination with mupirocin, was evaluated by determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) and the fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) and fractional bactericidal concentration indices against multidrug-resistant clinical MRSA strains. The in vivo efficacy of α-Pi, alone and in combination with mupirocin, to eradicate MRSA infection was determined using an optimized mouse model of MRSA-infected wounds. Mouse skin samples (obtained via biopsy) were assessed for toxicity, and rabbit skin samples for irritation. RESULTS: Both in vitro and in vivo, α-Pi was active against MRSA strains and acted synergistically with mupirocin against MRSA strains. Mupirocin-monoterpene combinations exhibited FICI values of 0.2 to 0.4, reducing the MBC of topical mupirocin 33-fold. A topical formulation containing α-Pi and mupirocin enhanced the efficacy of mupirocin in an in vivo MRSA-infected mouse skin model without significantly harming the skin of mice and rabbits. CONCLUSIONS: A topical formulation combining mupirocin and α-Pi may aid in the development of innovative agents for treating MRSA infections.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Monoterpenos Bicíclicos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mupirocina , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Camundongos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Monoterpenos Bicíclicos/administração & dosagem , Monoterpenos Bicíclicos/farmacologia , Humanos , Monoterpenos/farmacologia , Monoterpenos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino
6.
J Perinatol ; 44(5): 724-730, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38351274

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of active surveillance and decolonization strategies on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection rates in a NICU. STUDY DESIGN: MRSA infection rates were compared before (2014-2016) and during (2017-2022) an active surveillance program. Eligible infants were decolonized with chlorohexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing and/or topical mupirocin. Successful decolonization and rates of recolonization were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-two (0.57%) of 9 100 hospitalized infants had invasive MRSA infections from 2014 to 2022; infection rates declined non-significantly. During the 6-year surveillance program, the risk of infection was 16.9-times [CI95 8.4, 34.1] higher in colonized infants than uncolonized infants. Those colonized with mupirocin-susceptible MRSA were more likely successfully decolonized (aOR 9.7 [CI95 4.2, 22.5]). Of 57 infants successfully decolonized who remained hospitalized, 34 (60%) became recolonized. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA infection rates did not significantly decline in association with an active surveillance and decolonization program. Alternatives to mupirocin and CHG are needed to facilitate decolonization.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Clorexidina , Infecção Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Mupirocina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Recém-Nascido , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Banhos
7.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 37(4): 216-223, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353666

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of several local antibiotic regimens in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in clean surgical wounds. DATA SOURCES: The authors searched CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), the VIP (VIP information resource integration service platform), Wanfang Data knowledge service platform (WANFANG), SinoMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 20 randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 2000 and April 1, 2021 were included in this meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Authors extracted the name of the first author, publication date, country, type of surgery, follow-up time, mean age of participants, sample size of each group, interventions, outcome indicators, and study type from each article. DATA SYNTHESIS: The overall effectiveness of eight local managements in reducing the incidence of the SSI effect were compared through the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) probabilities. The results of a network meta-analysis demonstrated that gentamicin ointment (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.60), mupirocin ointment (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.94), and gentamicin soaking of the graft (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.91) significantly reduced the incidence of SSI compared with control. Further, vancomycin soaking of the graft (86.7%) ranked first, followed by gentamicin ointment (81.1%), gentamicin irrigation (79.9%), mupirocin ointment (56.8%), triple antibiotic ointment (47.8%), gentamicin soaking of the graft (42.3%), and vancomycin powder (22.1%); ampicillin powder (17.8%) was the least effective drug. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that local antibiotics combined with conventional antibiotics in the wound before wound closure are effective in reducing the incidence of SSI in clean surgical wounds. Vancomycin inoculation of the graft exhibited the best effect.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Metanálise em Rede , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem
9.
JAMA ; 330(14): 1337-1347, 2023 10 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37815567

RESUMO

Importance: Universal nasal mupirocin plus chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing in intensive care units (ICUs) prevents methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and all-cause bloodstream infections. Antibiotic resistance to mupirocin has raised questions about whether an antiseptic could be advantageous for ICU decolonization. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of iodophor vs mupirocin for universal ICU nasal decolonization in combination with CHG bathing. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two-group noninferiority, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted in US community hospitals, all of which used mupirocin-CHG for universal decolonization in ICUs at baseline. Adult ICU patients in 137 randomized hospitals during baseline (May 1, 2015-April 30, 2017) and intervention (November 1, 2017-April 30, 2019) were included. Intervention: Universal decolonization involving switching to iodophor-CHG (intervention) or continuing mupirocin-CHG (baseline). Main Outcomes and Measures: ICU-attributable S aureus clinical cultures (primary outcome), MRSA clinical cultures, and all-cause bloodstream infections were evaluated using proportional hazard models to assess differences from baseline to intervention periods between the strategies. Results were also compared with a 2009-2011 trial of mupirocin-CHG vs no decolonization in the same hospital network. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the primary outcome was 10%. Results: Among the 801 668 admissions in 233 ICUs, the participants' mean (SD) age was 63.4 (17.2) years, 46.3% were female, and the mean (SD) ICU length of stay was 4.8 (4.7) days. Hazard ratios (HRs) for S aureus clinical isolates in the intervention vs baseline periods were 1.17 for iodophor-CHG (raw rate: 5.0 vs 4.3/1000 ICU-attributable days) and 0.99 for mupirocin-CHG (raw rate: 4.1 vs 4.0/1000 ICU-attributable days) (HR difference in differences significantly lower by 18.4% [95% CI, 10.7%-26.6%] for mupirocin-CHG, P < .001). For MRSA clinical cultures, HRs were 1.13 for iodophor-CHG (raw rate: 2.3 vs 2.1/1000 ICU-attributable days) and 0.99 for mupirocin-CHG (raw rate: 2.0 vs 2.0/1000 ICU-attributable days) (HR difference in differences significantly lower by 14.1% [95% CI, 3.7%-25.5%] for mupirocin-CHG, P = .007). For all-pathogen bloodstream infections, HRs were 1.00 (2.7 vs 2.7/1000) for iodophor-CHG and 1.01 (2.6 vs 2.6/1000) for mupirocin-CHG (nonsignificant HR difference in differences, -0.9% [95% CI, -9.0% to 8.0%]; P = .84). Compared with the 2009-2011 trial, the 30-day relative reduction in hazards in the mupirocin-CHG group relative to no decolonization (2009-2011 trial) were as follows: S aureus clinical cultures (current trial: 48.1% [95% CI, 35.6%-60.1%]; 2009-2011 trial: 58.8% [95% CI, 47.5%-70.7%]) and bloodstream infection rates (current trial: 70.4% [95% CI, 62.9%-77.8%]; 2009-2011 trial: 60.1% [95% CI, 49.1%-70.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Nasal iodophor antiseptic did not meet criteria to be considered noninferior to nasal mupirocin antibiotic for the outcome of S aureus clinical cultures in adult ICU patients in the context of daily CHG bathing. In addition, the results were consistent with nasal iodophor being inferior to nasal mupirocin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03140423.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Banhos , Clorexidina , Iodóforos , Mupirocina , Sepse , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração Intranasal , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Banhos/métodos , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Iodóforos/administração & dosagem , Iodóforos/uso terapêutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como Assunto , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 44(11): 1707-1716, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34719647

RESUMO

Mupirocin nanoparticle-loaded hydrogel (MLH) was successfully developed. This study focused on the safety of cell lines and the biocompatibility of MLH for wound healing in rat models. MLH was assessed by an analysis of cytotoxicity and the secretion of inflammatory cytokines in cell lines. The cytocompatibility of MLH was compared with mupirocin ointment on full-thickness burn wounds in rats. The results indicated that MLH and blank hydrogel had no toxicity to human epidermal keratinocytes and human fibroblast cells. MLH inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activity in macrophage-like cells resulting in low nitric oxide production and reduced inflammatory cytokine production (interleukin (IL)-1ß) compared with a positive control (LPS only). In burn wounds, MLH and hydrogel healed the wound better than the other groups determined by wound contraction, reduced secretion, and the generation of new blood vessels, as well as promotion of hair follicle cells. Better granulation tissue proliferation, less necrosis, and a lower degree of inflammation were found in the MLH and blank hydrogel than in the mupirocin ointment. The hydrogel group reduced the macrophages (CD68) on day 14 at the edge of the wound. On day 28, T cells (CD3), B cells (CD20), and CD68+ cells were concentrated in the deeper subcutaneous tissue. Additionally, the transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1) concentration and matrix prometalloproteinase-2/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 ratio in the MLH and hydrogel groups were less than those in the other groups. The MLH formulation was safe and effective in burn wound healing. Therefore, MLH formulations are promising candidates for further evaluation in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Queimaduras/tratamento farmacológico , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Materiais Biocompatíveis , Linhagem Celular , Movimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Colágeno/metabolismo , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Hidrogéis , Masculino , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/efeitos adversos , Sistemas de Liberação de Fármacos por Nanopartículas , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos
11.
Dermatol Online J ; 27(7)2021 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391333

RESUMO

Periungual pyogenic granulomas are benign vascular tumors that present as painful, round, spontaneously bleeding lesions composed of rapidly proliferating capillaries and excess tissue. The vast majority of pyogenic granulomas are caused by physical trauma or infectious agents and they may resolve spontaneously. Herein, we highlight a very rare case of periungual pyogenic granulomas induced by the regularly prescribed oral retinoid acitretin during treatment for congenital palmoplantar keratoderma. This unique case showed that it is feasible to continue acitretin therapy in the presence of pyogenic granuloma development if proper dose reduction and topical therapies are utilized. The patient's lesions resolved within two weeks of this protocol's initiation and the pyogenic granulomas did not recur over the course of a six-month follow-up observation period. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed databases for the clinical features and treatments in other reported acitretin-induced pyogenic granuloma cases; we compiled a comprehensive list of other prescription drugs known to cause pyogenic granulomas up-to-date.


Assuntos
Acitretina/efeitos adversos , Granuloma Piogênico/induzido quimicamente , Ceratolíticos/efeitos adversos , Doenças da Unha/induzido quimicamente , Acitretina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Clobetasol/administração & dosagem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Ceratodermia Palmar e Plantar/tratamento farmacológico , Ceratolíticos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem
12.
Pharm Dev Technol ; 26(8): 852-866, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34193003

RESUMO

The goal of this study was to develop and examine the nanogel-based topical delivery system of mupirocin. Nanogels were prepared with chitosan and bovine serum albumin by ionic gelation and Carbopol 940 was added to improve the gelling/adhesive properties. Detailed characterization studies were performed and the cellular binding capacity of radiolabeled nanogels was investigated on CCD-1070Sk cell lines. Results indicate the successful formation of nanogels with particle size and zeta potential ranged between 341.920-603.320 nm and 13.120-24.300 mV, respectively. The mechanical and rheological studies proved pseudoplastic and strong elastic gel behavior (G' > G''). Mupirocin was successfully entrapped into nanogels with a ratio of more than 95% and the loaded drug was slowly released up to 93.89 ± 3.07% within 24 h. The ex vivo penetration and permeation percentages of mupirocin were very low (1.172 ± 0.202% and 0.161 ± 0.136%) indicating the suitability of nanogels for dermal use against superficial skin infections. The microbiological studies pointed out the effectiveness of nanogels against Staphylococcus aureus strains. Nanogels did not show toxicity signs and the cell binding capacity of radiolabeled formulations was found to be higher than [99mTc]NaTcO4 to CCD-1070Sk cell line. Overall, mupirocin nanogels might be considered as a potential and safe topical treatment option for bacterial skin infections.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Nanogéis , Resinas Acrílicas/administração & dosagem , Resinas Acrílicas/química , Administração Cutânea , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Quitosana/administração & dosagem , Quitosana/química , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Humanos , Mupirocina/farmacocinética , Nanogéis/administração & dosagem , Nanogéis/química , Permeabilidade , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Soroalbumina Bovina/administração & dosagem , Soroalbumina Bovina/química , Espectroscopia de Infravermelho com Transformada de Fourier , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos
13.
J Pediatr ; 236: 70-77, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023342

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical mupirocin in reducing Staphylococcus aureus colonization in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of mupirocin vs placebo in S aureus-colonized infants was conducted in a tertiary care NICU between October 2016 and December 2019. Weekly universal active surveillance with polymerase chain reaction screening identified colonized infants. Colonized infants received a 5-day course of mupirocin (mupirocin group) or petroleum jelly (control group). Repeat courses were given for additional positive screens. RESULTS: A total of 216 infants were enrolled; 205 were included in data analyses. Primary decolonization was more successful for mupirocin-treated infants (86 of 104 [83%]) than for controls (20 of 101; 20%) (P < .001). Although recurrent S aureus colonization occurred frequently (59 of 81 [73%] mupirocin-treated and 26 of 33 [79%] controls), subsequent decolonization remained more successful for mupirocin-treated infants than for controls (38 of 49 [78%] vs 2 of 21 [10%]; P < .001). Subgroup analyses of infants of ≤30 weeks' gestational age yielded similar results; decolonization occurred more often in mupirocin-treated infants compared with control infants (63 of 76 [83%] vs 13 of 74 [18%]; P < .001). Bacterial sterile site infections tended to be less frequent in mupirocin-treated infants compared with controls (2 of 104 [2%] vs 8 of 101 [8%]; P = .057). No invasive S aureus infections occurred in mupirocin-treated infants, but 50% of infections in controls were from S aureus, and 1 resulted in death. CONCLUSIONS: Universal active surveillance and targeted treatment with topical mupirocin is a successful decolonization strategy for NICU infants and may prevent S aureus infection. However, S aureus colonization frequently recurs, necessitating repeat treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02967432.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Carga Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Administração Tópica , Método Duplo-Cego , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Estudos Prospectivos , Retratamento , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo
14.
Assay Drug Dev Technol ; 19(4): 216-225, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33781090

RESUMO

In the present study, mupirocin (MP), an antimicrobial agent, was formulated as a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) by using a novel method named as melt emulsion ultrafiltration method. For the formulation of NLC, glyceryl monostearate and watermelon seed oil were used as solid and liquid lipids, respectively. The method was optimized for various parameters by Taguchi design of experiment and prepared NLCs were characterized for particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), shape, zeta potential, % drug loading, and in vitro release profile. The optimized NLCs were found to be smooth, monodisperse with PDI 0.229 ± 0.093. NLCs were found to have an average particle size of 139 ± 0.75 nm and +21.9 ± 0.98 mV as zeta potential. The % drug loading of optimized NLCs was found to be 59% ± 0.13%. The optimized NLCs were able to release the drug up to 24 h. The release kinetic study revealed mixed-order kinetics. Hence, it was concluded that the novel method is simple and able to fabricate MP-loaded NLCs with sustained release property and being stable in terms of particle size, PDI, and % drug loading.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/química , Citrullus/química , Portadores de Fármacos , Composição de Medicamentos , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Glicerídeos/química , Cinética , Lipídeos/química , Mupirocina/química , Nanoestruturas , Tamanho da Partícula , Óleos de Plantas/química , Ultrafiltração
16.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 35(1): 107-133, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303331

RESUMO

Staphylococcus aureus infections are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, and health care costs. S aureus colonization has been shown to increase risk for invasive and noninvasive infections. Decolonization of S aureus has been evaluated in multiple patient settings as a possible strategy to decrease the risk of S aureus transmission and infection. In this article, we review the recent literature on S aureus decolonization in surgical patients, patients with recurrent skin and soft tissue infections, critically ill patients, hospitalized non-critically ill patients, dialysis patients, and nursing home residents to inform clinical practice.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Estado Terminal , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Diálise/métodos , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Casas de Saúde , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
17.
J Sci Med Sport ; 24(6): 520-525, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33303369

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Skin and soft tissue infections commonly affect athletes and can lead to cluster outbreaks if not managed appropriately. We report the findings of an investigation into an outbreak of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection in an Australian professional football team. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Nose, axilla, groin and throat swab were collected from 47 participants. MRSA and MSSA isolates underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing, binary typing and whole genome sequencing. Infection control practitioners (ICPs) investigated the training grounds for risk factors in the transmission of S. aureus. RESULTS: Almost half of the participants (n=23, 48.9%) were found to be colonised with MSSA. An outbreak cluster of MRSA ST5 closely related to the fusidic acid-resistant New Zealand NZAK3 clone was identified in a group of four players. MSSA ST15 and MSSA ST291 strains were found to have colonised and spread between two and five players, respectively. All participants were advised to undergo decolonisation treatment consisting of 4% chlorhexidine body wash and mupirocin nasal ointment for ten days. The ICP team identified several unhygienic practices within the club's shared facilities that may have played a role in the transmission of S. aureus. CONCLUSIONS: We report for the first time a community-associated S. aureus outbreak involving the highly successful fusidic acid-resistant MRSA ST5 clone in a professional football club associated with inadequate hygiene procedures. Management and prevention of S. aureus relies heavily on hygiene education and adherence to personal and environmental hygiene practices and policies.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Futebol Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intranasal , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Austrália/epidemiologia , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/transmissão , Estudos Transversais , Ácido Fusídico/farmacologia , Genoma Bacteriano , Humanos , Higiene , Meticilina/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Pomadas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
18.
J Orthop Res ; 39(2): 333-338, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33258495

RESUMO

Preoperative decolonization, especially of Staphylococcus aureus carriers, has been proposed to reduce periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), but the evidence-based consensus is still lacking and data on long-term outcomes is scarce. In a previous randomized, single-blinded trial, decolonization produced no significant reduction of surgical site infections in overall elective orthopedic surgery at 3-month follow-up. A 2-year follow-up was then performed to specifically detect the impact of decolonization on delayed-onset PJI (3-24 months after surgery). Between November 2015 and September 2017, 613 of 1318 recruited patients underwent prosthetic surgery. Individuals were allocated into either the S. aureus carrier group (34%, 207 of 613 patients) or the noncarrier group (406 of 613 patients), according to nasal swab screening results. Both groups were then randomized into intervention and control arms. In the S. aureus group, the intervention consisted of daily chlorhexidine showers and application of mupirocin nasal ointment twice a day for 5 days before surgery. In noncarriers, only chlorhexidine showers were prescribed. Sample size calculation was based on the initial trial for overall and not for the prosthetic surgery group. No PJI was found at 2 years in either the carrier or in the noncarrier group. Therefore, no definite conclusion about the efficacy of preoperative decolonization to reduce PJI can be drawn. PJI proportions in this study were lower than described in the literature (mostly around 0.3%). Despite the insufficient sample size, this trial is the largest randomized trial on decolonization with a long-term follow-up, and results may be helpful for future meta-analyses.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Administração Intranasal , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril , Artroplastia do Joelho , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
19.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(23): 1965-1972, 2020 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32959059

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be detected via nasal screens. Evidence indicates that negative MRSA nasal screens may be used to de-escalate anti-MRSA antibiotics in pulmonary infections. In the ICU, universal decolonization with intranasal mupirocin is implemented to reduce MRSA infection risk. This study aimed to determine whether mupirocin administration affects the reliability of MRSA PCR nasal screens. METHODS: This retrospective study divided subjects based on timing of intranasal mupirocin administration-before and after MRSA screen. Subjects with confirmed pulmonary infection that received vancomycin, blood/respiratory cultures, and had MRSA PCR screen collected were included. Subjects with concurrent infection requiring vancomycin or MRSA infection in prior 30 days were excluded. Primary outcome of this non-inferiority study was the negative predictive value (NPV) of the screen. Secondary outcomes included the positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of the screen and duration of vancomycin. RESULTS: Ultimately, 125 subjects were included in each group. The NPV in the group receiving mupirocin before screen was 95.2%, whereas the NPV in the group receiving mupirocin after screen was 99%. The difference between groups was -3.8% (90% CI -7.8%-0.2%; p=0.31), which failed to meet non-inferiority criteria. The secondary outcomes of PPV, sensitivity and specificity of the screen were similar in both groups. The duration of vancomycin was significantly longer in subjects receiving mupirocin before screen (3 days vs. 2 days; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intranasal mupirocin prior to the screen may reduce NPV in pulmonary infections. Approach de-escalation of vancomycin based on screen results with caution.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nariz/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
20.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 9: CD007239, 2020 09 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32987448

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the health benefits of breastfeeding, initiation and duration rates continue to fall short of international guidelines. Many factors influence a woman's decision to wean; the main reason cited for weaning is associated with lactation complications, such as mastitis. Mastitis is an inflammation of the breast, with or without infection. It can be viewed as a continuum of disease, from non-infective inflammation of the breast to infection that may lead to abscess formation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of preventive strategies (for example, breastfeeding education, pharmacological treatments and alternative therapies) on the occurrence or recurrence of non-infective or infective mastitis in breastfeeding women post-childbirth. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (3 October 2019), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of interventions for preventing mastitis in postpartum breastfeeding women. Quasi-randomised controlled trials and trials reported only in abstract form were eligible. We attempted to contact the authors to obtain any unpublished results, wherever possible.  Interventions for preventing mastitis may include: probiotics, specialist breastfeeding advice and holistic approaches.   DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 trials (3034 women). Nine trials (2395 women) contributed data. Generally, the trials were at low risk of bias in most domains but some were high risk for blinding, attrition bias, and selective reporting. Selection bias (allocation concealment) was generally unclear. The certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of bias and to imprecision (low numbers of women participating in the trials). Conflicts of interest on the part of trial authors, and the involvement of industry funders may also have had an impact on the certainty of the evidence. Most trials reported our primary outcome of incidence of mastitis but there were almost no data relating to adverse effects, breast pain, duration of breastfeeding, nipple damage, breast abscess or recurrence of mastitis. Probiotics versus placebo Probiotics may reduce the risk of mastitis more than placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 0.75; 2 trials; 399 women; low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain if probiotics reduce the risk of breast pain or nipple damage because the certainty of evidence is very low. Results for the biggest of these trials (639 women) are currently unavailable due to a contractual agreement between the probiotics supplier and the trialists. Adverse effects were reported in one trial, where no woman in either group experienced any adverse effects. Antibiotics versus placebo or usual care The risk of mastitis may be similar between antibiotics and usual care or placebo (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.34; 3 trials; 429 women; low-certainty evidence). The risk of mastitis may be similar between antibiotics and fusidic acid ointment (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.81; 1 trial; 36 women; low-certainty evidence) or mupirocin ointment (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.05 to 3.89; 1 trial; 44 women; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. None of the trials reported adverse effects. Topical treatments versus breastfeeding advice The risk of mastitis may be similar between fusidic acid ointment and breastfeeding advice (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.22; 1 trial; 40 women; low-certainty evidence) and mupirocin ointment and breastfeeding advice (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.35; 1 trial; 48 women; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. One trial (42 women) compared topical treatments to each other. The risk of mastitis may be similar between fusidic acid and mupirocin (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.00; low-certainty evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Specialist breastfeeding education versus usual care The risk of mastitis (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.17 to 4.95; 1 trial; 203 women; low-certainty evidence) and breast pain (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.37; 1 trial; 203 women; low-certainty evidence) may be similar but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Anti-secretory factor-inducing cereal versus standard cereal The risk of mastitis (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.72; 1 trial; 29 women; low-certainty evidence) and recurrence of mastitis (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.03 to 4.57; 1 trial; 7 women; low-certainty evidence) may be similar but we are uncertain due to the wide CIs. Adverse events were not reported. Acupoint massage versus routine care Acupoint massage probably reduces the risk of mastitis compared to routine care (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.78;1 trial; 400 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and breast pain (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.23; 1 trial; 400 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported. Breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment versus routine care Breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment may reduce risk of mastitis (RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.21; 1 trial; 300 women; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that acupoint massage is probably better than routine care, probiotics may be better than placebo, and breast massage and low frequency pulse treatment may be better than routine care for preventing mastitis. However, it is important to note that we are aware of at least one large trial investigating probiotics whose results have not been made public, therefore, the evidence presented here is incomplete. The available evidence regarding other interventions, including breastfeeding education, pharmacological treatments and alternative therapies, suggests these may be little better than routine care for preventing mastitis but our conclusions are uncertain due to the low certainty of the evidence. Future trials should recruit sufficiently large numbers of women in order to detect clinically important differences between interventions and results of future trials should be made publicly available.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Aleitamento Materno/efeitos adversos , Mastite/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Viés , Grão Comestível/química , Feminino , Ácido Fusídico/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Massagem/métodos , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Neuropeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Pomadas/administração & dosagem , Placebos/uso terapêutico , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA