Exclusão do muromonabe para tratamento de pacientes em imunossupressão em transplante renal / Exclusion of muromonabe for the treatment of patients in immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

CONTEXTO: o transplante renal é a opção terapêutica de escolha para pacientes com doença renal crônica em estádio terminal (estádio V). A imunossupressão é dividida em indução da imunossupressão e manutenção, podendo haver necessidade de tratamento da rejeição aguda do transplante. O anticorpo monoclonal anti-CD3 muromonabe atua no bloqueio de receptores CD3 das células T impedindo a reação de rejeição do enxerto. No processo de revisão do PCDT de imunossupressão, foi verificado que o medicamento muromonabe estava com o registro cancelado na Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA), confirmando informações dos especialistas na reunião de escopo realizada em abril/2019 para revisão do PCDT vigente. Sendo assim, o PCDT foi atualizado sem o medicamento e com as alternativas medicamentosas como a timoglobulina e basiliximabe como opções para indução da imunossupressão e timoglobulina, imunoglobulina e plasmaférese para tratamento da rejeição aguda. JUSTIFICATIVA DA EXCLUSÃO: medicamento com registro cancelado na ANVISA. DELIBERAÇÃO FINAL: na 90ª reunião do Plenário da Conitec, realizada nos dias 02 e 03 de setembro de 2020, deliberaram, por unanimidade, recomendar a exclusão de muromonabe para imunossupressão em transplante renal, conforme apresentado no Relatório de Recomendação n° 554/2020. Foi assinado o Registro de Deliberação n° 548/2020. DECISÃO: Excluir o muromonabe para tratamento de pacientes em imunossupressão em transplante renal, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, conforme Portaria n° 42, publicada no Diário Oficial da União n° 182, seção 1, página 159, em 22 de setembro de 2020.

Oral Administration of OKT3 MAb to Patients with NASH, Promotes Regulatory T-cell Induction, and Alleviates Insulin Resistance: Results of a Phase IIa Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial.

UNLABELLED: Oral administration of anti-CD3 antibodies induced regulatory T cells (Tregs) alleviating the insulin resistance and liver damage in animal models. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and biological effects of oral OKT3 monoclonal antibody (Balashov et al. Neurology 55:192-8, 2000) in patients with NASH. DESIGN: In this Phase-IIa trial, four groups of patients with biopsy-proven NASH (n = 9/group) received placebo (group A) or oral OKT3 (group B: 0.2; C: 1.0; D: 5.0 mg/day) for 30 days. Patients were followed for safety, liver enzymes, glucose, lipid profile, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), serum cytokines and Tregs. RESULTS: Oral OKT3 was well tolerated without treatment-related adverse events. OKT3 induced Tregs: with significant increases of CD4(+)LAP(+) (Latency associated peptide) and CD4(+)CD25(+)LAP(+) cells in Group D, and a significant increase in TGF-ß in Groups C and D. AST decreased significantly in group D and a trend in Groups B and C. Fasting plasma glucose decreased significantly in all treatment groups compared with placebo. OGTT decreased significantly in Group D. Correlations were observed between the changes in several immune-modulatory effects and clinical biomarkers. While serum anti-CD3 levels where undetectable increases in human anti-mouse antibody levels were observed in Groups C and D. CONCLUSION: Oral administration of anti-CD3 MAb to patients with NASH was safe and well tolerated. Positive biological effects were noted in several hepatic, metabolic and immunologic parameters. These findings provide the basis for future trials to investigate the effect of oral anti-CD3 MAb immunotherapy in patients with NASH.

Association of antibody induction immunosuppression with cancer after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Induction immunosuppression is a mainstay of rejection prevention after transplantation. Studies have suggested a connection between antibody induction agents and cancer development, potentially limiting important immunosuppression protocols. METHODS: We used a linkage of U.S. transplantation data and cancer registries to explore the relationship between induction and cancer after transplantation. A total of 111,857 kidney recipients (1987-2009) in the Transplant Cancer Match Study, which links the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and U.S. Cancer Registries, were included. Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and other cancers with increased incidence after transplantation (lung, colorectal, kidney, and thyroid cancers, plus melanoma). RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred sixty-three cancers of interest were identified. Muromonab-CD3 was associated with increased NHL (aIRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.76). Alemtuzumab was associated with increased NHL (aIRR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.02-3.14), colorectal cancer (aIRR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.03-5.91), and thyroid cancer (aIRR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.55-7.33). Polyclonal induction was associated with increased melanoma (aIRR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.06-2.14). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the relative safety with regard to cancer risk of the most common induction therapies, the need for surveillance of patients treated with alemtuzumab, and the possible role for increased melanoma screening for those patients treated with polyclonal anti-T-cell induction.

Severity of the TGN1412 trial disaster cytokine storm correlated with IL-2 release.

AIM: To determine if cytokine release with a solid phase assay is predictive of adverse responses for a range of therapeutic mAbs. METHODS: Cytokine ELISAs and a multi-array system were used to compare responses generated by different therapeutic mAbs using a solid phase assay. Flow cytometry was employed to determine the cellular source of those cytokines. RESULTS: Only TGN1412 and muromonab-CD3 stimulated CD4+ T-cell mediated cytokine release characterized by significant (all P < 0.0001) IFNγ, TNFα, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17 and IL-22 release, comparable with T-cell mitogen. Significantly greater (P < 0.0001) IL-2 release with TGN1412 (2894-6051 pg ml⁻¹) compared with muromonab-CD3 (62-262 pg ml⁻¹) differentiated otherwise comparable cytokine responses. Likewise, TGN1412 stimulated significantly more (P = 0.0001) IL-2 producing CD4+ T-cells than muromonab-CD3 and induced Th1, Th2, Th17 and Th22 subsets that co-release this cytokine. Significant TNFα release was observed with bevacizumab (P = 0.0001), trastuzumab (P = 0.0031) and alemtuzumab (P = 0.0177), but no significant IL-2 release. TGN1412 and muromonab-CD3 caused pro-inflammatory cytokine release despite significantly (both P < 0.0001) increasing numbers of T-cells with a regulatory phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of the adverse response to TGN1412 compared with muromonab-CD3 and other therapeutic mAbs correlates with the level of IL-2 release.

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia after liver transplantation: post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder or coincidental de novo leukaemia?

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders of T-cell origin are quite uncommon, and the vast majority represent neoplasms of mature, post-thymic T- or natural killer cells. Here, we report a rare case of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL), which occurred in an 18-year-old man who had undergone three liver transplants, initially for biliary atresia and subsequently for graft failure due to chronic rejection. He had received immunosuppression with cyclosporine and tacrolimus, as well as short-term treatment with OKT3. The T-ALL occurred 16 years after the first liver transplant. This case highlights the challenge for classifying rare neoplasms occurring in recipients of solid organ transplants that are currently not recognized to lie within the spectrum of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Given the long interval between the liver transplants and the development of T-ALL, a coincidental occurrence of the leukaemia cannot be ruled out. However, the potential roles of immunosuppressive therapy and other co-morbid conditions of the individual as possible risk factors for the pathogenesis of T-ALL are discussed.

Teplizumab for treatment of type 1 diabetes (Protégé study): 1-year results from a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Findings of small studies have suggested that short treatments with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies that are mutated to reduce Fc receptor binding preserve ß-cell function and decrease insulin needs in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the safety and efficacy of one such antibody, teplizumab. METHODS: In this 2-year trial, patients aged 8-35 years who had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for 12 weeks or fewer were enrolled and treated at 83 clinical centres in North America, Europe, Israel, and India. Participants were allocated (2:1:1:1 ratio) by an interactive telephone system, according to computer-generated block randomisation, to receive one of three regimens of teplizumab infusions (14-day full dose, 14-day low dose, or 6-day full dose) or placebo at baseline and at 26 weeks. The Protégé study is still underway, and patients and study staff remain masked through to study closure. The primary composite outcome was the percentage of patients with insulin use of less than 0·5 U/kg per day and glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1C)) of less than 6·5% at 1 year. Analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00385697. FINDINGS: 763 patients were screened, of whom 516 were randomised to receive 14-day full-dose teplizumab (n=209), 14-day low-dose teplizumab (n=102), 6-day full-dose teplizumab (n=106), or placebo (n=99). Two patients in the 14-day full-dose group and one patient in the placebo group did not start treatment, so 513 patients were eligible for efficacy analyses. The primary outcome did not differ between groups at 1 year: 19·8% (41/207) in the 14-day full-dose group; 13·7% (14/102) in the 14-day low-dose group; 20·8% (22/106) in the 6-day full-dose group; and 20·4% (20/98) in the placebo group. 5% (19/415) of patients in the teplizumab groups were not taking insulin at 1 year, compared with no patients in the placebo group at 1 year (p=0·03). Across the four study groups, similar proportions of patients had adverse events (414/417 [99%] in the teplizumab groups vs 98/99 [99%] in the placebo group) and serious adverse events (42/417 [10%] vs 9/99 [9%]). The most common clinical adverse event in the teplizumab groups was rash (220/417 [53%] vs 20/99 [20%] in the placebo group). INTERPRETATION: Findings of exploratory analyses suggest that future studies of immunotherapeutic intervention with teplizumab might have increased success in prevention of a decline in ß-cell function (measured by C-peptide) and provision of glycaemic control at reduced doses of insulin if they target patients early after diagnosis of diabetes and children. FUNDING: MacroGenics, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and Eli Lilly.

[Clinical study of single-dose of recombinant humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody injection in kidney transplant recipients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term and long-term safety of using single-dose escalation of recombinant humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3) in kidney transplantation recipients. METHODS: A total of 29 recipients of cadaveric kidney transplant from June 2008 to December 2008 were sequently assigned to receive single-dose intravenous injection of OKT3 with different doses of 2.5 mg (n = 9), 5.0 mg (n = 10) and 10.0 mg (n = 10) at Days 7 - 14 post-operation. Meanwhile, a control group was established by selecting kidney transplant recipients, who did not participate in the trial in the same period. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. During this period, liver function, kidney function, hemoglobin and other biochemical indicators were monitored and adverse events recorded over time. RESULTS: No obvious first dose effect was observed, except low heat (7/29), chills (4/29), mild liver damage (2/29), upper respiratory tract infection and headache (1/29) across all doses. Other adverse reactions were mild, unrelated with doses. The 2-year patients/grafts survival rates of treatment group and control group were 100%/100%, and 100%/97%, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection confirmed by renal biopsy was 6.9% (2/29) and 10.0% (3/30) in treatment group and control group, respectively. The incidence of lung infection was 10.3% (3/29) and 13.3% (4/30), respectively. The values of serum creatinine at 1 week and 3, 6, 12, 24 months showed no statistically significance in two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It is safe to use single-shot OKT3 intravenously in kidney transplant recipients. The recombinant humanized OKT3 may be an effective immunosuppressive agent with milder toxicity for solid organ transplantation.

Falsely elevated plasma parathyroid hormone level mimicking tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of misdiagnosed tertiary hyperparathyroidism attributable to heterophile antibody interference in a parathyroid hormone (PTH) assay. METHODS: We present clinical and laboratory data relative to this case and review the pertinent English-language literature. RESULTS: A 36-year-old woman with a functioning renal allograft, PTH excess (3,374 pg/mL) refractory to medical therapy, and a history of renal osteodystrophy presented for consideration of a third parathyroidectomy. Remedial parathyroidectomy was performed. The PTH levels did not decline postoperatively, but the patient developed severe hypocalcemia. Reanalysis of the patient's serum specimens was performed with (1) addition of heterophile blocking agents to the murine-based immunoassay and (2) use of a different, goat antibody-based immunoassay. The true PTH level was found to be 5 pg/mL with use of both methods. CONCLUSION: Previous administration of muromonab-CD3 (Orthoclone OKT3) for immunosuppression may have resulted in the development of human antimurine heterophile antibodies, causing a falsely elevated PTH result.

Antithymocyte globulin use for treatment of biopsy confirmed acute rejection is associated with prolonged renal allograft survival.

Antithymocyte globuline (ATG) and OKT3 have been used for treatment of severe biopsy confirmed acute renal allograft rejection (BCAR). We report results on graft and patient survival including 399 subjects diagnosed with BCAR treated with either ATG or OKT3. Multivariable analyses including Banff scores were performed following three different strategies to account for confounding variables. Fifty per cent of subjects in the OKT3 group had a functioning graft 6.3 years after diagnosis of BCAR, but 74% of ATG patients' grafts were still functioning at that time point (log rank P = 0.006). Median actual graft survival was only 4.6 years in the OKT3 subjects, but 9.5 years for ATG-treated patients (log rank P = 0.004). Multivariable analysis revealed that the risk for functional graft loss was significantly elevated in the OKT3 compared to ATG patients (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.02, P = 0.029). The risk for actual graft loss, counting death as event, was also significantly elevated in the OKT3 patients (HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.09-2.74, P = 0.019). The hazard of death was not different between the groups (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.87-2.77, P = 0.137). These data suggest that rejecting renal allografts treated with ATG exhibit longer graft survival than OKT3 treated transplant kidneys. Causal inference, however, cannot be drawn from this associational study.

Oral administration of OKT3 monoclonal antibody to human subjects induces a dose-dependent immunologic effect in T cells and dendritic cells.

INTRODUCTION: Parenteral OKT3 is used to treat transplant rejection and a humanized anti-CD3 Mab has shown positive clinical effects in new onset diabetes. Oral administration of anti-CD3 has not been tested in humans, but suppresses autoimmunity in animal models. Beta-glucosylceramide enhances NKT cell and regulatory T cell activity and enhances the effects of oral anti-CD3 in animals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers (three per group) received orally administered OKT3 over a dose range of 0.2 to 5.0 mg daily with or without beta-glucosylceramide 7.5 mg for 5 days. Safety and immune parameters were measured on days 5, 10, and 30. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Oral OKT3 enhanced T cell proliferation, suppressed Th1 and Th17 responses by 43% and 41%, respectively, increased TGF-beta/IL-10 expression and decreased IL-23/IL-6 expression by dendritic cells, and affected the IgG repertoire as measured by antigen arrays. Co-administration of oral beta-glucosylceramide induced similar effects. No side effects were observed and no subjects developed human anti-mouse antibodies. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that oral anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody is safe and biologically active in humans and presents a new avenue for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Non-skin solid tumors as a cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation.

The use of immunosuppressive agents in renal transplant recipients increases the risk of tumor development. The global incidence of tumors in renal transplant recipients is 4% to 18% and is especially high for skin lesions, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and genital malignancy but not for lung, breast, prostate gland, or colorectal lesions. Between May 1983 and May 2008, we performed 663 renal transplantation procedures; 85.5% were first transplantation procedures. Mean patient age was 46.93 years. Patients received treatment with combinations of immunosuppressive agents including corticosteroids, cyclosporine, OKT3, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, azathioprine, and basiliximab or daclizumab. The incidence of nonskin tumors was 4.07%. Mean age at diagnosis was 61.41 years, mean interval between transplantation and diagnosis of tumor was 6.04 years, and mean duration of graft function was 7.59 years. Mortality was due to tumor in 20.14% of patients, and of those with cancer, 74.07% died; all patients who died had a functioning graft. The most common malignant lesions were lung cancer in men and breast cancer in women. The incidence of nonskin tumors was lower than that in published series, probably because of routine screening of patients while on the waiting list and in transplant recipients with functioning grafts.

Treatment of patients with new onset Type 1 diabetes with a single course of anti-CD3 mAb Teplizumab preserves insulin production for up to 5 years.

Anti-CD3 mAbs may prolong beta cell function up to 2 years in patients with new onset Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). A randomized open label trial of anti-CD3 mAb, Teplizumab, in T1DM was stopped after 10 subjects because of increased adverse events than in a previous trial related with higher dosing of drug. Teplizumab caused transient reduction in circulating T cells, but the recovered cells were not new thymic emigrants because T cell receptor excision circles were not increased. There was a trend for reduced loss of C-peptide over 2 years with drug treatment (p=0.1), and insulin use was lower (p<0.001). In 4 drug-treated subjects followed up to 60 months, C-peptide responses were maintained. We conclude that increased doses of Teplizumab are associated with greater adverse events without improved efficacy. The drug may marginate rather than deplete T cells. C-peptide levels may remain detectable up to 5 years after treatment.

Influence of induction therapy, immunosuppressive regimen and anti-viral prophylaxis on development of lymphomas after heart transplantation: data from the Spanish Post-Heart Transplant Tumour Registry.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoma after heart transplantation (HT) has been associated with induction therapy and herpesvirus infection. It is not known whether anti-viral agents administered immediately after HT can reduce the incidence of lymphoma. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 3,393 patients who underwent HT in Spain between 1984 and December 2003. Variables examined included development of lymphoma and, as possible risk factors, recipient gender and age, induction therapies (anti-thymocyte globulin, OKT3 and anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir or ganciclovir). To study the effect of evolving treatment strategy, three HT eras were considered: 1984 to 1995; 1996 to 2000; and 2001 to 2003. RESULTS: Induction therapy was employed in >60% of HTs, and anti-viral prophylaxis in >50%. There were 62 cases of lymphoma (3.1 per 1,000 person-years, 95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 4.0). Univariate analyses showed no influence of gender, age at transplant, HT era, pre-HT smoking or the immunosuppressive maintenance drugs used in the first 3 months post-HT. The induction agent anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was associated with increased risk of lymphoma, and prophylaxis with acyclovir with decreased risk of lymphoma. Multivariate analyses (controlling for age group, gender, pre-HT smoking and immunosuppression in the first 3 months with mycophenolate mofetil and/or tacrolimus) showed that induction increased the risk of lymphoma if anti-viral prophylaxis was not used (regardless of induction agent and anti-viral agent), but did not increase the risk if anti-viral prophylaxis was used. CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapies with ATG or OKT3 do or do not increase the risk of lymphoma depending on whether anti-viral prophylaxis with acyclovir or ganciclovir is or is not employed, respectively.

[Malignant tumors following renal transplantation]. / A veseátültetést követoen kialakuló rosszindulatú daganatok.

Patient survival time following renal and other solid organ transplantation has been increasing recently, in part due to modern immunosuppressive regimens. However, the probability of malignant tumor formation is also increasing proportionally to survival time, as a side effect of long-term immunosuppression. The primary factor of increased tumor risk is the deficient antitumoral and antiviral function of the immune system. The frequency of posttransplantation tumors is 2 to 4-fold compared to the non-transplanted population, and the distribution of tumor types is also different. The most frequent tumor types--skin cancer, lymphoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, oral cancer, anogenital tumors, etc.--are often associated with oncogenic viruses. Treatment options and the prognosis of posttransplant tumors are worse than in the normal population. The increasing frequency of posttransplantation tumors is an important factor determining the long-term fate of transplant patients. The reduction of carcinogenic agents, the early diagnosis and treatment of tumors and precancerous conditions, low dose immunosuppression and the usage of immunosuppressive agents with an oncologically favorable, anti-proliferative effect will help reduce the risk of posttransplant tumor formation.

Analysis of risk factors for the development of posttransplant lymphoprolipherative disorder among 119 children who received primary intestinal transplants at a single center.

UNLABELLED: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-known complication after pediatric transplantation. We analyzed all potential risk factors to assess patient and graft outcomes of 119 children who received intestinal transplantations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1994 and March 2005, 119 patients underwent cadaveric intestinal transplantation. Their median age at transplant was 1.4 years (range: 0.6-17), median weight was 9.5 kg (range: 4.7-67), and 57% were boys. The median follow-up among 49 ongoing survivors was 41 months (range: 4-121). All PTLD cases were biopsy proven. In the past 5 years, treatment included antiviral therapy, immunosuppression withdrawal, and use of rituximab. RESULTS: The incidence of PTLD was 11.8% (14/119). No patient experienced graft failure secondary to PTLD, while two patients died from PTLD (14.2%). The PTLD group was divided into an early onset group (<4 months, 6 of 14; 42.8%) and a late onset group (>2 years, 8 of 14; 57.2%). No patient experienced PTLD between 4 months and 2 years after transplantation. The use of OKT3 was the only significant risk factor for the development of PTLD. No factor was specifically associated with the early versus late development of PTLD. CONCLUSIONS: The only factor associated with a significantly higher risk of PTLD was the use of OKT3 to treat a rejection episode. Finally, since the the introduction of anti-CD20 antibodies as part of the treatment protocol for PTLD, the risk of death due to PTLD appears to have become manageably low.

Muromonab-CD3 (Orthoclone OKT3), methylprednisolone and cyclosporine for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.

We report the results of a prospective non-randomized phase II study of Muromonab-CD3 (Orthoclone OKT3), an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, with methylprednisolone (MP) and cyclosporine (CSA) for acute GVHD (aGVHD) prophylaxis in 22 hematologic malignancy patients. OKT3 was given at 0.1 mg/kg/day with a maximum dose of 5 mg/day. Initial MP dose was 1000 mg before OKT3, with subsequent doses at 1 mg/kg/day before each OKT3 infusion with a planned taper beginning at day +28. CSA (3 mg/kg/day) was given as a continuous infusion at day -1 and adjusted to maintain serum levels between 250 and 399 ng/ml. Allogeneic BMT donors were HLA-matched siblings (n = 17), single HLA-mismatched-related (n = 1) and HLA-matched unrelated (n = 4). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median 11 days (range, 8-25 days). By intent-to-treat, the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 33% (95% CI 13-53%) at a median 26 days post-BMT (range, 14-84 days). Chronic GVHD developed in 11/12 evaluable patients. Eight patients (36%) developed OKT3 first dose reactions; no cases of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder were observed. OKT3 depleted peripheral CD3+ cells in vivo as measured by flow cytometry. OKT3+MP+CSA combination is moderately effective aGVHD prophylaxis, however, it is unlikely to be superior to CSA+MTX.

A randomized multicenter comparison of basiliximab and muromonab (OKT3) in heart transplantation: SIMCOR study.

BACKGROUND: Antilymphocytic antibodies have been long used for the prevention of acute rejection early after heart transplantation (HTx), but their adverse effects have limited their widespread use. Our aim was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the novel anti-CD25 antibody basiliximab (BAS) compared with muromonab (OKT3). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study, 99 patients were randomly assigned to receive either BAS or OKT3 in the early post-HTx period. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Specific safety variables were predefined for a better comparison of adverse effects. Secondary endpoints concerning anti-rejection efficacy were also evaluated. RESULTS: No adverse events related to study medication were found in the BAS group, whereas 23 were observed among patients receiving OKT3 (P<0.0001). The proportion of patients with predefined adverse events day 4 post-HTx was much higher with OKT3 than with BAS (43% vs. 4%; P<0.0001). Fever, acute pulmonary edema, hypotension, and other complications accounted for most of the difference. At 1-year follow-up, biopsy-proven rejection episodes grade>or=3A had occurred in 39.6% of BAS patients versus 40.4% of OKT3 patients (P=0.87). There were no differences in terms of severity and timing of acute rejection episodes. The number of infectious episodes, complications not related to study medication, and actuarial survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In this HTx study, induction therapy with BAS was safer and better tolerated than OKT3, without significant differences in efficacy outcomes.

Disassociation between risk of graft loss and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with induction agents in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: It is widely assumed that the graft-enhancing properties of antilymphocyte induction agents and their lymphoma-inducing potential are intimately related. METHODS: The Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) database was used to evaluate graft survival and non-Hodgkin lymphoma at 3 years according to type of induction in 112,122 patients receiving a deceased-donor renal transplant during 1985 to 2004. RESULTS: The relative risk of 3-year graft loss versus no induction was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.13; P=0.016) with murine anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (OKT3), 1.03 (95% CI, 0.95-1.11; NS) with antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-Fresenius, 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02-1.35; P=0.021) with ATGAM, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.81; P<0.001) with Thymoglobulin, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84; P<0.001) with interleukin (IL)-2RA induction. The standardized incidence ratio of lymphoma compared with a similar nontransplant population was 21.5 (95% CI, 15.7-28.8; P<0.001) with OKT3, 4.9 (95% CI, 1.6-11.5; P=0.008) with ATG-Fresenius, 29.0 (95% CI, 12.5-57.1; P<0.001) with ATGAM, 21.6 (95% CI, 14.3-31.2; P<0.001) with Thymoglobulin, 7.8 (95% CI, 4.4-12.9; P<0.001) with IL-2RAs, and 9.4 (95% CI, 8.3-10.6 P<0.001) with no induction. CONCLUSIONS: Those agents that offered the highest rates of graft survival were not necessarily associated with the highest risk of lymphoma. Graft survival was significantly improved with Thymoglobulin and IL-2RA induction, whereas lymphoma rates were highest with ATGAM, OKT3, and Thymoglobulin. IL-2RA agents seem to offer the best risk-to-benefit ratio for this patient population overall in terms of graft survival and lymphoma.