Clinical pharmacokinetics of nebivolol: a systematic review.

Nebivolol is a beta-1 receptor blocker used to treat hypertension, heart failure, erectile dysfunction, vascular disease, and diabetes mellitus. This review investigated the data regarding pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, drug-drug interactions, dextrorotatory (D), and levorotatory (L) stereoisomers of nebivolol. The articles related to the PK of nebivolol were retrieved by searching the five databases; Google Scholar, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO. A total of 20 studies comprising plasma concentration-time profile data following the nebivolol's oral and intravenous (IV) administration were included. The area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 15 times greater in poor metabolizers (PMs) than in extensive metabolizers (EMs). In hypertensive patients, L-nebivolol expressed a higher maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) than D-nebivolol, i.e. 2.5 ng/ml vs 1.2 ng/ml. The AUC0-∞ of nebivolol was 3-fold greater in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The clearance (CL) was increased in obese than in controls from 51.6 ± 11.6 L/h to 71.6 ± 17.4 L/h when 0.5 mg/ml IV solution was infused. Nebivolol showed higher Cmax, AUC0-∞ and half-life (t1/2) when co-administered with bupropion, duloxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, lansoprazole, and fluoxetine. This concise review of nebivolol would be advantageous in assessing all PK parameters, which may be crucial for clinicians to avoid drug-drug interactions, prevent adverse drug events and optimize the dosage regimen in diseased patients diagnosed with hypertension and cardiovascular disorders.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models of CYP2D6 Substrate and Inhibitors Nebivolol, Cinacalcet and Mirabegron to Simulate Drug-Drug Interactions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Index substrates and inhibitors to investigate the role of the polymorphic enzyme, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, in the metabolism of new compounds have been proposed by regulatory agencies. This work describes the development and verification of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for the CYP2D6-sensitive substrate, nebivolol and the index CYP2D6 inhibitors, mirabegron and cinacalcet. METHODS: PBPK models for nebivolol, mirabegron and cinacalcet were developed using in vitro and clinical data. The performance of the PBPK models was verified by comparing the simulated results against reported human systemic exposure and clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs) studies. RESULTS: The exposure of nebivolol, cinacalcet and mirabegron predicted by the PBPK models was verified against pharmacokinetic data from 13, 3 and 9 clinical studies, respectively. For nebivolol, the predicted mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time (AUC) values in CYP2D6 extensive metaboliser subjects were within 0.9- to 1.49-fold of the observed values. In poor metaboliser CYP2D6 subjects, the predicted Cmax and AUC values were within 0.41- to 0.81-fold of observed values. For cinacalcet, the predicted Cmax and AUC values were within 0.97- to 1.32-fold of the observed data. For mirabegron, the predicted AUC values across all the studies investigated were within 0.71- to 1.88-fold of observed values. The PBPK model-predicted DDIs were in good agreement (within 2-fold) with observed DDIs in all verification studies (n = 8) assessed. The overall precision was 1.26 and 1.21 for Cmax and the AUC ratio, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The developed PBPK models can be used to assess the DDI potential liability of new chemical entities that are substrates or inhibitors of CYP2D6.

Influence of CYP2D6*5 and *10 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of nebivolol in healthy Chinese subjects.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Nebivolol, a selective ß1 adrenoreceptor antagonist, is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6 and shows a wide interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the major CYP2D6 polymorphisms on nebivolol disposition in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-eight volunteers were enrolled and classified as CYP2D6*1/*1, CYP2D6*1/*10, CYP2D6*10/*10 and CYP2D6*5 carriers according to their genotypes. The concentration of nebivolol was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The association between the pharmacokinetic parameters and genotypes was evaluated using the unpaired t test or analysis of variance. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We evaluated the effects of CYP2D6*5 and *10 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of nebivolol. Plasma nebivolol peak concentration and area under the curve (AUC(0-48 h) and AUC(0-∞) ) were significantly higher in subjects with CYP2D6*5 and CYP2D6*10/*10 polymorphism than those in subjects with wild-type CYP2D6 (CYP2D6*1/*1), whereas its plasma clearance was significantly lower in the CYP2D6*10/*10 and CYP2D6*5 carriers. No significant differences in the peak time and terminal half-life of nebivolol were observed among CYP2D6*10/*10, CYP2D6*1/*1 and CYP2D6*5 carriers. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Both CYP2D6*5 and *10 polymorphism altered the pharmacokinetics of nebivolol in healthy Chinese volunteers. Further studies are required to investigate the effects of these single-nucleotide polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicity of nebivolol.

Development and validation of a bio-analytical method for simultaneous quantification of nebivolol and labetalol in aqueous humor and plasma using LC-MS/MS and its application to ocular pharmacokinetic studies.

Beta blockers is the class of choice of drugs in treatment of open angle Glaucoma. However, many of these drugs suffer from systemic side effects due to their absorption into systemic circulation via nasolachrymal duct. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebivolol and labetalol for the treatment of open angle glaucoma, it is important to have a bioanalytical method for measuring the drug concentrations both in aqueous humor and plasma. A simple, sensitive and high throughput liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with protein precipitation technique was developed for simultaneous quantification of nebivolol and labetalol using nebivolol-d4 and metoprolol, respectively, as internal standards in aqueous humor and plasma. Nebivolol and labetalol were monitored in electrospray positive ionization (ESI) mode at transition 406.2/151.1 and 329.2/162.0, respectively. Mobile phase comprised of mixture of aqueous buffer (solvent A) and organic phase (solvent B) (mixture of A:B in the ratio of 30:70, v/v). The aqueous buffer was 5 mM ammonium acetate buffer adjusted to pH 3.5 ±â€¯0.05 with formic acid while the organic phase was a mixture of methanol and acetonitrile in the ratio of 25:75, v/v. Chromatographic separation was achieved using reverse phase Zorbax SB-C18 column (4.6 × 100 mm, 3.5 µm). Method was linear in both the matrices in the concentration range of 0.43-750 ng/mL for nebivolol and 0.39-668 ng/mL for labetalol with r2 > 0.99. Accuracy values, expressed in terms of bias (%), for nebivolol in aqueous humor and plasma were ≤9.6% and ≤11.4% and for labetalol were ≤8.6% and ≤5.9%, respectively. Inter-day and intra-day precision values, expressed in terms of RSD (%), for both the drugs were within 11.4%. No interference was obtained due to matrix components. Mean recovery (%) values in aqueous humor and plasma were 72.4% and 73.0% for nebivolol and 56.7% and 54.4% for labetalol, respectively. No significant degradation was observed in both the drugs in both the matrices when stored at -20 °C for 1 month. Aqueous humor and plasma samples of nebivolol and labetalol on bench top were stable for 18 h and 8 h, respectively. The developed method was applied for determining pharmacokinetic parameters of both drugs in aqueous humor following single dose ocular administration in rabbits.

Effect of CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizer Phenotype on Stereoselective Nebivolol Pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Nebivolol is a drug available as a racemate of d-nebivolol (SRRR) and lnebivolol (RSSS). In human liver microsomes, CYP2D6 mainly catalyses the metabolism of lnebivolol, while CYP2C19 catalyses the metabolism of d-nebivolol. Nebivolol stereoselective pharmacokinetics has been described only for extensive metabolizers (EM). OBJECTIVE: To describe the stereoseletive nebivolol pharmacokinetics in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM) and to assess whether the phenotype has an impact on nebivolol pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Three healthy volunteers PM phenotyped (ratios of 20.1, 220 and 244 for the 8 h urinary excretion of metoprolol/alfa-hydroxymetoprolol) received a single oral dose of racemic nebivolol and sequential blood samples were collected between zero (predose) and 48 h. RESULTS: The obtained data were compared to 22 EM subjects with normal kidney function enrolled in our previous study. For both isomers, Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-48 were significantly greater in the PM group compared to the EMs (p = 0.006 - 0.001). For d-nebivolol, Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-48 were, on average, 5.9, 2.7 and 15.0 larger in PMs. The corresponding values for l-nebivolol were 4.4, 2.7 and 17.5. CONCLUSION: The decline in plasma concentration of both nebivolol isomers in PM phenotypes, especially those with MR of 220 and 244, which indicate minimal or absent CYP2D6 activity, points to alternative mechanisms for nebivolol elimination. Collectively, our results are the first to show the significant impact of CYP2D6 PM phenotype on the metabolic disposition and in vivo exposure to both nebivolol isomers.

Novel bio analytical method development, validation and application for simultaneous determination of nebivolol and S-amlodipine in human plasma using ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A sensitive and specific ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (UPLC-MS/MS) method has been developed, validated and applied for the assay of Nebivolol and S-amlodipine in human plasma. Sample extraction was carried out through hybrid extraction method from 250 µL of human plasma sample. Linearity of the method was (r ≥ 0.9996) was found to be dynamic for both the analytes over concentration range of 25.0-4000 pg/mL. Chromatographic separation was achieved on UPLC column {Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 micrometer)} with the mobile phase composition of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in 5 mM Ammonium formate in water-acetonitrile (20:80, %v/v). Analytes Stability was assured under different requisite conditions in human plasma, reconstitution solution and diluents. Inter and intra-day assay precision and relative error (accuracy) were within ±5% for both analytes. The method was applied and reproduced to support a pharmacokinetic study of 5 mg Nebivolol (NEB) and 2.5 mg S-amlodipine (LAM) tablet on 9 healthy subjects.

Additivity of nebivolol/valsartan single-pill combinations versus other single-pill combinations for hypertension.

The single-pill combination (SPC) comprising nebivolol (5 mg), a vasodilatory ß1 -selective antagonist/ß3 -agonist, and valsartan (80 mg), a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved ß-blocker/renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor SPC for hypertension. Additive effects of four nebivolol/valsartan SPC doses (5 mg/80 mg, 5/160 mg, 10/160 mg, 10/320 mg nebivolol/valsartan) were compared with five Food and Drug Administration-approved non-ß-blocker/renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor SPCs (aliskiren/hydrochlorothiazide, aliskiren/amlodipine, valsartan/amlodipine, aliskiren/valsartan, and telmisartan/amlodipine). Additivity is the ratio of placebo-adjusted SPC blood pressure (BP) reduction to the placebo-adjusted monotherapy component BP reduction sums. A weighted average of comparator scores was calculated and compared vs nebivolol/valsartan. Additivity ratio scores for nebivolol/valsartan SPCs (diastolic BP range: 0.735-0.866; systolic BP range: 0.717-0.822) were similar to the comparator weighted average (diastolic BP: 0.837; systolic BP: 0.825). Among the nebivolol/valsartan SPCs, 5/80 mg had the greatest additivity (diastolic BP: 0.866; systolic BP: 0.822). BP reduction contributions with monotherapy were similar for nebivolol/valsartan 5/80 mg SPC. Additivity scores for nebivolol/valsartan and select non-ß-blocker/renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor SPCs were comparable.

Investigation of a Potential Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Nebivolol and Fluvoxamine in Healthy Volunteers.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether fluvoxamine coadministration can influence the pharmacokinetic properties of nebivolol and its active hydroxylated metabolite (4-OH-nebivolol) and to assess the consequences of this potential pharmacokinetic interaction upon nebivolol pharmacodynamics. METHODS: This open-label, non-randomized, sequential clinical trial consisted of two periods: Period 1 (Reference), during which each volunteer received a single dose of 5 mg nebivolol and Period 2 (Test), when a combination of 5 mg nebivolol and 100 mg fluvoxamine was given to all subjects, after a 6-days pretreatment regimen with fluvoxamine (50-100 mg/day). Non-compartmental analysis was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of nebivolol and its active metabolite. The pharmacodynamic parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were assessed at rest after each nebivolol intake, during both study periods. RESULTS: Fluvoxamine pretreatment increased Cmax and AUC0-∞  of nebivolol (Cmax: 1.67 ± 0.690  vs 2.20 ± 0.970  ng/mL; AUC0-∞: 12.1 ± 11.0  vs 19.3 ± 19.5  ng*h/mL ) and of its active metabolite (Cmax: 0.680  ± 0.220  vs 0.960 ± 0.290  ng/mL; AUC0-∞: 17.6 ±20.1  vs 25.5 ± 29.9  ng*h/mL). Apart from Cmax,AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, the other pharmacokinetic parameters (tmax, kel and t½) were not significantly different between study periods. As for the pharmacodynamic analysis, decreases in blood pressure and heart rate after nebivolol administration were similar with and without fluvoxamine concomitant intake. CONCLUSIONS: Due to enzymatic inhibition, fluvoxamine increases the exposure to nebivolol and its active hydroxylated metabolite in healthy volunteers. This did not influence the blood pressure and heart-rate lowering effects of the beta-blocker administered as single-dose. However, more detail studies involving actual patients are required to further investigate the clinical relevance of this drug interaction. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.

Nebivolol/valsartan: Fixed-dose combination for treatment of hypertension.

Clinical trials demonstrated that a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of the beta-blocker nebivolol (5 mg) and the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan (80 mg) produced a significant reduction of both diastolic and systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Both nebivolol and valsartan contributed to this effect, partial additivity of 86.6% and 82.2% being observed for diastolic and systolic blood pressure, respectively. These values are very similar to the additivity ratios of other recently approved FDCs for hypertension. Use of the FDC nebivolol 5 mg/valsartan 80 mg formulation was associated with a low incidence of treatment-related adverse effects and of serious adverse effects. There was no evidence of adverse effects due to beta2-adrenoceptor blockade. The FDC (Byvalson) was approved and launched in 2016 in the U.S. for the treatment of hypertension.

Bioequivalence study between a fixed-dose single-pill formulation of nebivolol plus hydrochlorothiazide and separate formulations in healthy subjects using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry.

Systemic arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for cerebrovascular disease. Therefore, adequate control of blood pressure is of enormous importance. One of the many fixed-dose single-pill antihypertensive formulations available on the market is the combination of nebivolol and hydrochlorothiazide. The objective of this study was to develop two distinct high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry methods to simultaneously quantify nebivolol and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. The methods were employed in a bioequivalence study, the first assay involving a nebivolol fixed-dose single-pill formulation based on healthy Brazilian volunteers. Nebilet HCT™ (nebivolol 5 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tablet, manufactured by Menarini) was the test formulation. The reference formulations were Nebilet™ (nebivolol 5 mg tablet, manufactured by Menarini) and Clorana™ (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg tablet, manufactured by Sanofi). For both analytes, liquid-liquid extraction was employed for sample preparation and the chromatographic run time was 3.5 min. The limits of quantification validated were 0.02 ng/mL for nebivolol and 1 ng/mL for hydrochlorothiazide. Since the 90% CI for Cmax , AUC(0-last) and AUC(0-inf) individual test/reference ratios were within the 80-125% interval indicative of bioequivalence, it was concluded that Nebilet HCT™ is bioequivalent to Nebilet™ and Clorana™.

Sustained release biodegradable solid lipid microparticles: Formulation, evaluation and statistical optimization by response surface methodology.

For preparing nebivolol loaded solid lipid microparticles (SLMs) by the solvent evaporation microencapsulation process from carnauba wax and glyceryl monostearate, central composite design was used to study the impact of independent variables on yield (Y1), entrapment efficiency (Y2) and drug release (Y3). SLMs having a 10-40 µm size range, with good rheological behavior and spherical smooth surfaces, were produced. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray diffractometry pointed to compatibility between formulation components and the zeta-potential study confirmed better stability due to the presence of negative charge (-20 to -40 mV). The obtained outcomes for Y1 (29-86 %), Y2 (45-83 %) and Y3 (49-86 %) were analyzed by polynomial equations and the suggested quadratic model were validated. Nebivolol release from SLMs at pH 1.2 and 6.8 was significantly (p < 0.05) affected by lipid concentration. The release mechanism followed Higuchi and zero order models, while n > 0.85 value (Korsmeyer- Peppas) suggested slow erosion along with diffusion. The optimized SLMs have the potential to improve nebivolol oral bioavailability.

Assessment of a Potential Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Nebivolol and Bupropion in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The study aimed at investigating the effects of multiple-dose bupropion (potent inhibitor of CYP2D6) on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of single-dose nebivolol (CYP2D6 substrate) and to evaluate the clinical relevance of this potential drug interaction. METHODS: This open-label, nonrandomized clinical study had a 2-period design: during period 1 (reference), a single dose of 5 mg nebivolol was administered, while during period 2 (test), 5 mg nebivolol + 300 mg bupropion were ingested concomitantly, after a pretreatment regimen with bupropion (7 days). The PK parameters of nebivolol and its active metabolite were analyzed by noncompartmental modeling, while the pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were assessed at rest. RESULTS: Bupropion plus nebivolol increased the mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of nebivolol (1.67 ± 0.69 vs. 3.80 ± 1.70 ng/ml) and its active metabolite (0.68 ± 0.22 vs. 1.13 ± 0.38 ng/ml) compared to nebivolol alone. After bupropion pretreatment, the exposure to nebivolol was increased by 7.2-fold for the parent drug and 4-fold for the hydroxylated active metabolite. The difference between the PD parameters measured during the 2 periods was not significant. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that bupropion influenced the PKs of nebivolol in healthy volunteers, but a clinical relevance was not established. However, this latter aspect requires further investigation.

Influence of chronic kidney disease and haemodialysis treatment on pharmacokinetics of nebivolol enantiomers.

AIM: The present study evaluated the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of nebivolol enantiomers in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in patients undergoing haemodialysis. METHODS: Forty-three adult patients were distributed into three groups: healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients with normal kidney function (n = 22); patients with stage 3 and 4 CKD (n = 11); and patients with stage 5 CKD undergoing haemodialysis (n = 10). The subjects received a single oral dose of 10 mg racemic nebivolol. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 h after administration of the drug and heart rate variation was measured over the same interval during the isometric handgrip test. The nebivolol enantiomers in plasma were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of nebivolol is enantioselective, with a greater plasma proportion of l-nebivolol. CKD increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of l-nebivolol (6.83 ng.h ml(-1) vs. 9.94 ng.h ml(-1) ) and d-nebivolol (4.15 ng.h ml(-1) vs. 7.30 ng.h ml(-1) ) when compared with the control group. However, the AUC values of l-nebivolol (6.41 ng.h ml(-1) ) and d-nebivolol (4.95 ng.h ml(-1) ) did not differ between the haemodialysis and control groups. The administration of a single dose of 10 mg nebivolol did not alter the heart rate variation induced by isometric exercise in the investigated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Stage 3 and 4 CKD increases the plasma concentrations of both nebivolol enantiomers, while haemodialysis restores the pharmacokinetic parameters to values similar to those observed in the control group. No significant difference in heart rate variation induced by isometric exercise was observed between the investigated groups after the administration of a single oral dose of 10 mg nebivolol.

Modification of solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with nebivolol hydrochloride for improvement of oral bioavailability in treatment of hypertension: polyethylene glycol versus chitosan oligosaccharide lactate.

Nebivolol (NB)-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) were prepared and modified with chitosan oligosaccharide lactate (COL) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) stearate for improvement of its oral bioavailability. Compritol, poloxamer and lecithin were used for the preparation of SLNs by homogenisation method. After in vitro characterisation effect of lipase, pepsin, or pancreatin on degradation and release rate were investigated. Cytotoxicity and permeation were studied on Caco-2 cells. As COL concentration increased in SLNs, size and zeta potential increased. PEG concentration was reversely proportional to particle size with no change in zeta potential. Encapsulation efficiencies (EEs) were determined as 84-98%. DSC confirmed solubilisation of NB in lipid matrix. A sustained release with no burst effect was determined. The presence of enzymes affected the release. SLNs did not reveal cytotoxicity and highest permeability was obtained with PEG modification. PEG-modified SLNs could be offered as a promising strategy for oral delivery of NB.

A Review of Nebivolol Pharmacology and Clinical Evidence.

Nebivolol is a highly selective ß1-adrenergic receptor antagonist with a pharmacologic profile that differs from those of other drugs in its class. In addition to cardioselectivity mediated via ß1 receptor blockade, nebivolol induces nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation by stimulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase via ß3 agonism. This vasodilatory mechanism is distinct from those of other vasodilatory ß-blockers (carvedilol, labetalol), which are mediated via α-adrenergic receptor blockade. Nebivolol is approved for the treatment of hypertension in the US, and for hypertension and heart failure in Europe. While ß-blockers are not recommended within the current US guidelines as first-line therapy for treatment of essential hypertension, nebivolol has shown comparable efficacy to currently recommended therapies in lowering peripheral blood pressure in adults with hypertension with a very low rate of side effects. Nebivolol also has beneficial effects on central blood pressure compared with other ß-blockers. Clinical data also suggest that nebivolol may be useful in patients who have experienced erectile dysfunction while on other ß-blockers. Here we review the pharmacological profile of nebivolol, the clinical evidence supporting its use in hypertension as monotherapy, add-on, and combination therapy, and the data demonstrating its positive effects on heart failure and endothelial dysfunction.

A Single-Center, Open-Label, 3-Way Crossover Trial to Determine the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction Between Nebivolol and Valsartan in Healthy Volunteers at Steady State.

Combining different classes of antihypertensives is more effective for reducing blood pressure (BP) than increasing the dose of monotherapies. The aims of this phase I study were to investigate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between nebivolol, a vasodilatory ß1-selective blocker, and valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, and to assess safety and tolerability of the combination. This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 3-way crossover trial in 30 healthy adults aged 18-45 years. Participants were randomized into 1 of 6 treatment sequences (1:1:1:1:1:1) consisting of three 7-day treatment periods followed by a 7-day washout. Once-daily oral treatments comprised nebivolol (20 mg), valsartan (320 mg), and nebivolol-valsartan combination (20/320 mg). Outcomes included AUC0-τ,ss, Cmax,ss, Tmax,ss, changes in BP, pulse rate, plasma angiotensin II, plasma renin activity, 24-hour urinary aldosterone, and adverse events. Steady-state pharmacokinetic interactions were observed but deemed not clinically significant. Systolic and diastolic BP reduction was significantly greater with nebivolol-valsartan combination than with either monotherapy. The mean pulse rate associated with nebivolol and nebivolol-valsartan treatments was consistently lower than that associated with valsartan monotherapy. A sharp increase in mean day 7 plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin II that occurred in valsartan-treated participants was significantly attenuated with concomitant nebivolol administration. Mean 24-hour urine aldosterone at day 7 was substantially decreased after combined treatment, as compared with either monotherapy. All treatments were safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, nebivolol and valsartan coadministration led to greater reductions in BP compared with either monotherapy; nebivolol and valsartan lower BP through complementary mechanisms.