Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(8): 1499-1507, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416016

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Routine use of adjunct intraprocedural fresh frozen biopsy (FFP) or point-of-care (POC) cytology at the time of image-guided biopsy can improve diagnostic tissue yields for musculoskeletal neoplasms, but these are associated with increased costs. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain the most cost-effective adjunctive test for image-guided biopsies of musculoskeletal neoplasms. METHODS: This expected value cost-effectiveness microsimulation compared the payoffs of cost (2020 United States dollars) and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life, in days) on each of the competing strategies. A literature review and institutional data were used to ascertain probabilities, diagnostic yields, utility values, and direct medical costs associated with each strategy. Payer and societal perspectives are presented. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses evaluated model uncertainties. RESULTS: The total cost and effectiveness for each of the strategies were $1248.98, $1414.09, $1980.53, and 80.31, 79.74, 79.69 days for the use of FFP, permanent pathology only, and POC cytology, respectively. The use of FFP dominated the competing strategies. Sensitivity analyses revealed FFP as the most cost-effective across all clinically plausible values. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunct FFP is most cost-effective in improving the diagnostic yield of image-guided biopsies for musculoskeletal neoplasms. These findings are robust to sensitivity analyses using clinically plausible probabilities.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/economia , Neoplasias Musculares/economia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Neoplasias Musculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Musculares/cirurgia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estados Unidos
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 88(9): 1207-11, 2006 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16943474

RESUMO

The most appropriate protocol for the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours is controversial, with some authors advocating CT-guided core biopsy. At our hospital the initial biopsies of most musculoskeletal tumours has been by operative core biopsy with evaluation by frozen section which determines whether diagnostic tissue has been obtained and, if possible, gives the definitive diagnosis. In order to determine the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of this protocol we have undertaken a retrospective audit of biopsies of musculoskeletal tumours performed over a period of two years. A total of 104 patients had biopsies according to this regime. All gave the diagnosis apart from one minor error which did not alter the management of the patient. There was no requirement for re-biopsy. This protocol was more labour-intensive and 38% more costly than CT-guided core biopsy (AU$1804 vs AU$1308). However, the accuracy and avoidance of the anxiety associated with repeat biopsy outweighed these disadvantages.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Sarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia , Biópsia/economia , Biópsia/métodos , Biópsia por Agulha/métodos , Neoplasias Ósseas/economia , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Erros de Diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Musculares/economia , Neoplasias Musculares/patologia , Neoplasias Musculares/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/economia , Sarcoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/economia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA