Neuronavigation-Specific Parameters for Selective Access of Trigeminal Rootlets in Radiofrequency Lesioning: A Cadaveric Morphometric Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Radiofrequency lesioning (RFL) is a safe and effective treatment for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Despite gaining mainstream neurosurgical acceptance in the 1970s, the technique has remained relatively unchanged, with the majority of series using lateral fluoroscopy over neuronavigation for cannula guidance. To date, there are no studies describing neuronavigation-specific parameters to help neurosurgeons selectively target individual trigeminal rootlets. In this cadaveric study, we sought to provide a neuronavigation-specific morphometric roadmap for selective targeting of individual trigeminal rootlets. METHODS: Embalmed cadaveric specimens were registered to cranial neuronavigation. Frontotemporal craniotomies were then performed to facilitate direct visualization of the Gasserian ganglion. A 19-gauge cannula was retrofit to a navigation probe, permitting real-time tracking. Using preplanned trajectories, the cannula was advanced through foramen ovale (FO) to the navigated posterior clival line (nPCL). A curved electrode was inserted to the nPCL and oriented inferolaterally for V3 and superomedially for V2. For V1, the cannula was advanced 5 mm distal to the nPCL and the curved electrode was reoriented inferomedially. A surgical microscope was used to determine successful contact. Morphometric data from the neuronavigation unit were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty RFL procedures were performed (10R, 10L). Successful contact with V3, V2, and V1 was made in 95%, 90%, and 85% of attempts, respectively. Mean distances from the entry point to FO and from FO to the clival line were 7.61 cm and 1.26 cm, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept study, we found that reliable access to V1-3 could be obtained with the neuronavigation-specific algorithm described above. Neuronavigation for RFL warrants further investigation as a potential tool to improve anatomic selectivity, operative efficiency, and ultimately patient outcomes.

A rare case of the auriculotemporal and inferior alveolar nerves communication.

This case study describes anatomical variations in the branching pattern of the posterior division of the trigeminal nerve and its clinical implications for dental and craniofacial surgery. The study presents two uncommon variations observed in an elderly male cadaver. A communicating branch connecting one of three roots of the auriculotemporal nerve and inferior alveolar nerve just before entering the mandibular foramen on the right side, and three communicating branches between the IAN and lingual nerve on the left side. The presence of such variations may complicate anesthesia associated with oral surgery procedures.

How to understand an enlarged Meckel's cave? An anatomical study.

PURPOSE: Dilatation of the trigeminal cavum, or Meckel's cave (MC), is usually considered a radiological sign of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. However, the normal size of the trigeminal cavum is poorly characterized. In this study, we describe the anatomy of this meningeal structure. METHODS: We dissected 18 MCs and measured the length and width of the arachnoid web and its extension along the trigeminal nerve. RESULTS: Arachnoid cysts were clearly attached to the ophthalmic (V1) and maxillary (V2) branches until they entered the cavernous sinus and foramen rotundum, respectively, without extension to the skull base. Arachnoid cysts were close to the mandibular branch toward the foramen ovale, with a median anteromedial extension of 2.5 [2.0-3.0] mm, lateral extension of 4.5 [3.0-6.0] mm, and posterior extension of 4.0 [3.2-6.0] mm. The trigeminal cavum arachnoid had a total width of 20.0 [17.5-25.0] mm and length of 24.5 [22.5-29.0] mm. CONCLUSION: Our anatomical study revealed variable arachnoid extension, which may explain the variability in size of the trigeminal cavum in images and calls into question the value of this structure as a sign of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. The arachnoid web extends beyond the limits described previously, reaching almost double the radiological size of the cavum, particularly at the level of V3 afference of the trigeminal nerve. It is possible that strong adhesion of the arachnoid to the nerve elements prevents the formation of a true subarachnoid space that can be visualized by magnetic resonance imaging.

Comparative Anatomic Study Between Intradural Suboccipital Retrosigmoid and Extradural Transzygomatic Middle Fossa Approaches to Expose the Trigeminal Nerve.

BACKGROUND: Meckel cave tumors are relatively rare, especially trigeminal nerve (TN) schwannomas. These tumors frequently project through the trigeminal pore, occupying the middle and posterior fossae. The most used routes to this region are the suboccipital retrosigmoid intradural approach (SORSA) and the transzygomatic middle fossa approach (TZMFA). Both approaches allow further exposure by adding intraoperative techniques, such as removing the suprameatal tubercle (retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach [RISA]) and the petrous apex (TZMFA-PA), respectively. This study aims to understand how TN exposure differs between both surgical approaches and how it increases by adding specific surgical maneuvers to these techniques. METHODS: Five formalin-fixed adult cadaver heads were submitted to high-resolution computed tomography and their images were loaded into the neuronavigation device. Anatomic key points were defined along the outline of the TN, and their three-dimensional spatial locations were collected following each surgical approach. This process allowed the calculation of the TN exposed area obtained through each technique. RESULTS: The mean areas of exposure of the TN were 125.9 mm2 with SORSA and 208.9 mm2 with RISA, which represents an additional mean gain of 61.92% (P = 0.047). Using TZMFA, a mean exposure of 419.24 mm2 was obtained. When TZMFA-PA was used, the mean exposed area was 486.03 mm2, representing a mean gain in the exposure area of 16.81% (P = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that TZMFA allows better exposure of TN ganglionic and postganglionic segments, and the removal of the PA adds the preganglionic segment visualization, although with less TN exposed area compared with RISA. With SORSA, the additional suprameatal tubercle removal shows the trigeminal pore and the medial margin of the central portion of the TN ganglionic segment, making it possible to expose the mouth of the Meckel cave and part of its contents.

The Trigeminal Nerve: Anatomy and Pathology.

The trigeminal nerve is the fifth cranial nerve and is a sensory-motor nerve that provides the innervation to the face with its three roots. The trigeminal nerve can be affected by several diseases, such as vascular conflict, congenital malformation, inflammatory or neoplastic diseases. Magnetic Resonance Imaging plays a crucial role in its evaluation. This article aims to review the trigeminal nerve anatomy, discuss the best magnetic resonance imaging techniques to evaluate each nerve segment, and demonstrate the imaging aspect of the diseases that most commonly affect it.

Ontogeny of the trigeminal system and associated structures in Alligator mississippiensis.

From the appearance of the vertebrate head, the trigeminal system has played a role in behavioral and ecological adaptation. The trigeminal nerve is the primary cranial somatosensory nerve, also innervating the jaw muscles. In crocodylians, the trigeminal nerve plays a role in modulating the high bite force and unique integumentary sensation. In association with these behaviors, crocodylians are known for large trigeminal nerves, a high volume of trigeminal-innervated musculature, and densely packed, specialized sensory receptors. These innovations also occurred in concert with a restructuring of the lateral braincase wall. These morphologies have previously been investigated in phylogenetic and evolutionary contexts, but an ontogenetic, whole-system investigation of trigeminal tissue and associated musculature, cartilage, and bone is lacking, as is an understanding of developmental timing of morphologies significant to hypotheses of homology. Here, we use contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging to provide description and analysis of the trigeminal system in an ontogenetic series of Alligator mississippiensis from embryonic to adult form. We explore growth rates and allometric relationships of structures and discuss the significance to hypotheses of homology. We find a high growth rate and allometric trajectory of the trigeminal nerve in comparison to other cranial nerves, likely associated with the large volume of trigeminal musculature and high densities of sensory receptors. We identify a similar trend in the pterygoideus dorsalis muscle, the highest contributor to bite force. We narrow ontogenetic timing of features related to the trigeminal topological paradigm and the undeveloped epipterygoid. Overall, we provide a basis for understanding trigeminal development in crocodylians, which upon comparison across reptiles will reveal ontogenetic origins of morphological variation.

Meckel Cave: An Anatomical Study Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To our knowledge, few studies have investigated anatomy of the Meckel cave with neuroimaging modalities. The present study aimed to characterize it using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following conventional MRI examination, a total of 101 patients underwent T2-weighted imaging in thin-sliced coronal and sagittal sections, and 11 patients underwent constructive interference steady-state sequences in thin-sliced sagittal sections. Moreover, 3 injected cadaver heads were dissected. RESULTS: In the cadaver specimens, the size and extent of the cerebrospinal fluid-filled space between the Gasserian ganglion and surrounding arachnoids were difficult to define. On the T2-weighted imaging, the Meckel cave was delineated with variable morphologies and left-right asymmetry. On the sagittal images, the shape of the Meckel cave could be classified into 3 different types, bulbous, oval, and flat, with the oval being the most frequent that comprised 60%. Furthermore, on the sagittal constructive interference steady-state images, parts of the trigeminal nerve distributed in the Meckel cave were delineated in all patients. The ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular divisions were clearly distinguished on both sides. CONCLUSIONS: The Meckel cave is a structure characterized by diverse morphologies and left-right asymmetry. Thin-sliced T2-weighted imaging is useful for exploring the anatomy of the Meckel cave.

The trigeminal system: The meningovascular complex- A review.

Supratentorial sensory perception, including pain, is subserved by the trigeminal nerve, in particular, by the branches of its ophthalmic division, which provide an extensive innervation of the dura mater and of the major brain blood vessels. In addition, contrary to previous assumptions, studies on awake patients during surgery have demonstrated that the mechanical stimulation of the pia mater and small cerebral vessels can also produce pain. The trigeminovascular system, located at the interface between the nervous and vascular systems, is therefore perfectly positioned to detect sensory inputs and influence blood flow regulation. Despite the fact that it remains only partially understood, the trigeminovascular system is most probably involved in several pathologies, including very frequent ones such as migraine, or other severe conditions, such as subarachnoid haemorrhage. The incomplete knowledge about the exact roles of the trigeminal system in headache, blood flow regulation, blood barrier permeability and trigemino-cardiac reflex warrants for an increased investigation of the anatomy and physiology of the trigeminal system. This translational review aims at presenting comprehensive information about the dural and brain afferents of the trigeminovascular system, in order to improve the understanding of trigeminal cranial sensory perception and to spark a new field of exploration for headache and other brain diseases.

Reappraisal of the types of trigeminal porus and importance in surgical applications.

OBJECTIVE: The detailed information regarding the types of trigeminal porus (TP) and related surgical approach is lacking in the literature. Therefore, we performed this study to elucidate further the types of TP and the relationships with critical surgical landmarks in the skull base. METHODS: The study was performed on 19 formalin-fixed cadavers of the cranial base (52.6% male, n = 10; 47.4% female, n = 9) on both sides. Calculations were made of the vertical dimension (VD), horizontal dimension (HD), and types of TP, the thickness of the TP, the HD and VD of the internal acoustic meatus, the distance between the TP-IAM, the thickness of the ossifying tissue that forms the TP, the trigeminal nerve (CN V) in both types and the distance between the CN V-VI. RESULTS: The elliptical (42.1% left, 36.8% right), oval (52.6% left, 36.8% right) and slit-like (5.3% right) types of TP were detected (X2 = 11.722). The HD of the TP was, on average, 8.02 mm (female) and 9.2 mm (male) on the right side, and 8.26 mm (female) and 8.81 mm (male) on the left side. The VD of the TP was, on average, 1.99 mm (female) and 2.65 mm (male) on the right side, and 2.42 mm (female) and 2.94 mm (male) on the left side. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, ellipse and slit-like types of TP are taken into account in order to plan the surgical approaches to remove or prevent the extension of tumors. A combined surgical technique is recommended to reach the TP easily without damaging the nearby surgical structures during surgery. The oval type of TP allows a wide range of movements, so it is more advantageous in skull base surgery.

Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia attributable to the vertebrobasilar artery: decompression technique and significance of separation from the nerve root.

BACKGROUND: Separation of the vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) from the trigeminal nerve root in microvascular decompression (MVD) is technically challenging. This study aimed to review the clinical features of VBA involvement in trigeminal neuralgia and evaluate surgical decompression techniques in the long term. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes of 26 patients (4.4%) with VBA involvement in 585 consecutive MVDs for TGN using a Teflon roll for repositioning the VBA. The final operative status of the nerve decompression was categorized into two groups: the separation group and the contact group. Separation of the VBA from the nerve root was completed in 13 patients in the separation group, and slight vascular contact remained in the remaining 13 patients of the contact group. The clinical features of VBA-related TGN were investigated and the operative results were analyzed. RESULTS: Multiple arteries are involved in neurovascular compression (NVC) in most cases. The anterior inferior cerebellar artery was the most common concomitant artery (69%). The site of the NVC varies from the root entry zone to the distal portion of the root. All patients were pain-free immediately after surgery and maintained medication-free status during the follow-up period, except for one patient (3.8%) who had recurrent facial pain 8 years after surgery. Postoperative facial numbness was observed in six patients (23%). Of these, one patient showed improvement within 3 months and the other five patients had persistent facial numbness (19.2%). Other neurological deficits include one dry eye, one diplopia due to trochlear nerve palsy, two decreased hearing (< 50 db), two facial weaknesses, and two cerebellar ataxia. Although most of them were transient, one dry eye, two hearing impairments, and one cerebellar ataxia became persistent deficits. Statistical analyses revealed no difference in surgical efficacy or complications in the long term between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Slightly remaining vascular contact does not affect pain relief in the long term. Our study indicated that once the tense trigeminal nerve is loosened, further attempts to mobilize the VBA are not necessary.

Anatomic Danger Zones of the Head and Neck.

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic procedures require a detailed understanding of surface anatomy to avoid complications. The head and neck region has prominent danger zones including nerves and vasculature that may be at risk during cutaneous surgery. A thorough understanding of these danger zones can help avoid complications that may lead to functional or cosmetic impairment. METHODS: The anatomic literature regarding the course of high-risk structures of the head and neck was reviewed. Structures deemed at risk during dermatologic procedures were included in the analysis. The final analysis focused on branches of the facial nerve, parotid duct, spinal accessory nerve, trigeminal nerve, and the lacrimal system. Anatomical information was compiled regarding each high-risk structure to develop a "danger zone" at which each respective structure is at risk. RESULTS: The danger zone for each structure was compiled based on the review of the literature and depicted in the figures. CONCLUSION: With careful attention to anatomy and the meticulous surgical technique, there is great potential for reduction in surgical injury to danger zones of the head and neck.

SnapShot: Orofacial Sensation.

Ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve provide sensory innervation to orofacial tissues. Trigeminal sensory neurons respond to a diverse array of sensory stimuli to generate distinct sensations, including thermosensation, mechanosensation, itching, and pain. These sensory neurons also detect the distinct sharpness or pungency of many foods and beverages. This SnapShot highlights the transduction ion channels critical to orofacial sensation.

Anatomy of Trigeminal Neuromodulation Targets: From Periphery to the Brain.

The trigeminal nerve complex is a very important and somewhat unique component of the nervous system. It is responsible for the sensory signals that arise from the most part of the face, mouth, nose, meninges, and facial muscles, and also for the motor commands carried to the masticatory muscles. These signals travel through a very complex set of structures: dermal receptors, trigeminal branches, Gasserian ganglion, central nuclei, and thalamus, finally reaching the cerebral cortex. Other neural structures participate, directly or indirectly, in the transmission and modulation of the signals, especially the nociceptive ones; these include vagus nerve, sphenopalatine ganglion, occipital nerves, cervical spinal cord, periaqueductal gray matter, hypothalamus, and motor cortex. But not all stimuli transmitted through the trigeminal system are perceivable. There is a constant selection and modulation of the signals, with either suppression or potentiation of the impulses. As a result, either normal sensory perceptions are elicited or erratic painful sensations are created. Electrical neuromodulation refers to adjustable manipulation of the central or peripheral pain pathways using electrical current for the purpose of reversible modification of the function of the nociceptive system through the use of implantable devices. Here, we discuss not only the distal components, the nerve itself, but also the sensory receptors and the main central connections of the brain, paying attention to the possible neuromodulation targets.

Optimizing Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Impact of Radiation Dose and Anatomic Target on Patient Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Radiosurgery is an increasingly popular treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN); however, several treatment variables require further study. This meta-analysis was conducted to clarify ambiguity in the literature and optimize treatment parameters. METHODS: A random-effects proportions meta-analysis using subgroup analysis and meta-regression investigated the association of prescription dose and anatomic target on outcomes in patients with typical TN. The PRISMA guidelines were used. Radiation doses used ranged from 70 to 90 Gy and the anatomic targets were either the root entry zone or a more distal nerve location. Outcome measures were pain at last follow-up and the development of bothersome numbness. RESULTS: Increasing radiation prescription dose was associated with improved outcomes across all analyzed doses (P < 0.001). Patients treated at a distal trigeminal nerve target had better pain control compared with a root entry zone target (P < 0.001). Despite a higher median dose, a distal target was independently associated with improved pain control. There were similar rates of bothersome numbness across radiation doses and both treatment targets. CONCLUSIONS: Higher radiation dose was associated with superior pain control without increasing bothersome numbness. Independent of dose, the distal target was also associated with improved pain control. Bothersome numbness was not related to dose or target.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Role of Trigeminal Length and Pontotrigeminal Angle on Target Definition and on Clinical Effects.

OBJECTIVE: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a well-defined treatment for trigeminal neuralgia. The aim of this study was to determine how the GKRS planning might change on the basis of the patient's own anatomy and how to best choose the target location. METHODS: Trigeminal cisternal length, pontotrigeminal angle, and distance between middle of the shot and emergence were evaluated in 112 consecutive GKRS plans for trigeminal neuralgia. Correlations with pain outcomes and facial hypoesthesia were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean angle was 29° ± 4.4° and 37° ± 0.9°, respectively, in patients developing and not developing severe hypoesthesia (P = 0.045), despite no significant difference on brainstem dose (11.9 ± 0.8 and 10.5 ± 0.3 Gy; P = 0.22). The length of the nerve was not relevant on clinical outcomes but the shot-emergence distance (mean 8.1 ± 0.2 mm) depended on both trigeminal length and angle (P = 0.01). At constant prescription dose, 6-month cumulative rates of pain relief and control without therapy were 52.9% when the shot-emergence distance was ≤8 mm, whereas 25% when this distance was >8 mm (P = 0.017). The maintenance of good pain control was more long lasting in the first group (49.5 ± 6.6 vs. 25.4 ± 5 months; P = 0.006) with a 5-year cumulative rate of 70% and 26%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The pontotrigeminal angle and the shot-emergence distance should be considered during GKRS planning: the first as a potential risk factor for hypoesthesia, and the second should not exceed 8 mm.

The emissary veins of the foramen ovale: an anatomical study using magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: The emissary veins (EVs) passing through the foramen ovale (FO) are not well understood. The aim of this study was to characterize these veins using contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In total, 85 patients underwent thin-sliced, contrast MRI. Coronal and sagittal images were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The EVs of the FO were well delineated in 100% on sagittal and 97% on coronal images. On the sagittal images, these veins could be classified into the lateral, medial, and perineural types in association with the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve (V3) segment in the FO. In 22% of the slides, the medial EV was more predominant than lateral one, while in 64% of the slides, the latter was more predominant. On the coronal images, the identified EVs of the FO coursed medially to the V3 in 68% and laterally in 72% of 165 sides. The perineural EVs most frequently coursed along both the lateral and medial surfaces of the V3. On the sagittal images, the angles formed by the midline of the V3 segment in the FO and lower margin of the FO were 81.5 ± 11.9° on the left side and 80.0 ± 12.2° on the right, while on the coronal images, they were 61.5 ± 12.1° on the left side and 64.8 ± 11.3° on the right. CONCLUSIONS: The EVs of the FO are structures that may be characterized by a well-developed venous channel in the lateral aspect of the V3 and nearly symmetrical orientation of both V3s lying in the FO.

Anatomical assessment of trigeminal nerve tractography using diffusion MRI: A comparison of acquisition b-values and single- and multi-fiber tracking strategies.

BACKGROUND: The trigeminal nerve (TGN) is the largest cranial nerve and can be involved in multiple inflammatory, compressive, ischemic or other pathologies. Currently, imaging-based approaches to identify the TGN mostly rely on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which provides localization of the cisternal portion of the TGN where the contrast between nerve and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is high enough to allow differentiation. The course of the TGN within the brainstem as well as anterior to the cisternal portion, however, is more difficult to display on traditional imaging sequences. An advanced imaging technique, diffusion MRI (dMRI), enables tracking of the trajectory of TGN fibers and has the potential to visualize anatomical regions of the TGN not seen on T2-weighted imaging. This may allow a more comprehensive assessment of the nerve in the context of pathology. To date, most work in TGN tracking has used clinical dMRI acquisitions with a b-value of 1000 s/mm2 and conventional diffusion tensor MRI (DTI) tractography methods. Though higher b-value acquisitions and multi-tensor tractography methods are known to be beneficial for tracking brain white matter fiber tracts, there have been no studies conducted to evaluate the performance of these advanced approaches on nerve tracking of the TGN, in particular on tracking different anatomical regions of the TGN. OBJECTIVE: We compare TGN tracking performance using dMRI data with different b-values, in combination with both single- and multi-tensor tractography methods. Our goal is to assess the advantages and limitations of these different strategies for identifying the anatomical regions of the TGN. METHODS: We proposed seven anatomical rating criteria including true and false positive structures, and we performed an expert rating study of over 1000 TGN visualizations, as follows. We tracked the TGN using high-quality dMRI data from 100 healthy adult subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). TGN tracking performance was compared across dMRI acquisitions with b = 1000 s/mm2, b = 2000 s/mm2 and b = 3000 s/mm2, using single-tensor (1T) and two-tensor (2T) unscented Kalman filter (UKF) tractography. This resulted in a total of six tracking strategies. The TGN was identified using an anatomical region-of-interest (ROI) selection approach. First, in a subset of the dataset we identified ROIs that provided good TGN tracking performance across all tracking strategies. Using these ROIs, the TGN was then tracked in all subjects using the six tracking strategies. An expert rater (GX) visually assessed and scored each TGN based on seven anatomical judgment criteria. These criteria included the presence of multiple expected anatomical segments of the TGN (true positive structures), specifically branch-like structures, cisternal portion, mesencephalic trigeminal tract, and spinal cord tract of the TGN. False positive criteria included the presence of any fibers entering the temporal lobe, the inferior cerebellar peduncle, or the middle cerebellar peduncle. Expert rating scores were analyzed to compare TGN tracking performance across the six tracking strategies. Intra- and inter-rater validation was performed to assess the reliability of the expert TGN rating result. RESULTS: The TGN was selected using two anatomical ROIs (Meckel's Cave and cisternal portion of the TGN). The two-tensor tractography method had significantly better performance on identifying true positive structures, while generating more false positive streamlines in comparison to the single-tensor tractography method. TGN tracking performance was significantly different across the three b-values for almost all structures studied. Tracking performance was reported in terms of the percentage of subjects achieving each anatomical rating criterion. Tracking of the cisternal portion and branching structure of the TGN was generally successful, with the highest performance of over 98% using two-tensor tractography and b = 1000 or b = 2000. However, tracking the smaller mesencephalic and spinal cord tracts of the TGN was quite challenging (highest performance of 37.5% and 57.07%, using two-tensor tractography with b = 1000 and b = 2000, respectively). False positive connections to the temporal lobe (over 38% of subjects for all strategies) and cerebellar peduncles (100% of subjects for all strategies) were prevalent. High joint probability of agreement was obtained in the inter-rater (on average 83%) and intra-rater validation (on average 90%), showing a highly reliable expert rating result. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results of the study suggest that researchers and clinicians may benefit from tailoring their acquisition and tracking methodology to the specific anatomical portion of the TGN that is of the greatest interest. For example, tracking of branching structures and TGN-T2 overlap can be best achieved with a two-tensor model and an acquisition using b = 1000 or b = 2000. In general, b = 1000 and b = 2000 acquisitions provided the best-rated tracking results. Further research is needed to improve both sensitivity and specificity of the depiction of the TGN anatomy using dMRI.

Endoscopic endonasal treatment of maxillary nerve (V2) painful neuropathy: cadaveric study with clinical correlation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical access to the second (V2, maxillary) and third (V3, mandibular) branches of the trigeminal nerve (V) has been classically through a transoral approach. Increasing expertise with endoscopic anatomy has achieved less invasive, more efficient access to skull base structures. The authors present a surgical technique using an endoscopic endonasal approach for the treatment of painful V2 neuropathy. METHODS: Endoscopic endonasal dissections using a transmaxillary approach were performed in four formalin-fixed cadaver heads to expose the V2 branch of the trigeminal nerve. Relevant surgical anatomy was evaluated and anatomic parameters for neurectomy were identified. RESULTS: Endoscopic endonasal transmaxillary approaches completed bilaterally to the pterygopalatine and pterygomaxillary fossae exposed the V2 branch where it emerged from the foramen rotundum. The anatomy defined for the location of neurectomy was determined to be the point where V2 emerged from the foramen rotundum into the pterygopalatine fossa. The technique was then performed in 3 patients with intractable painful V2 neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: In our cadaveric study and clinical cases, the endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa achieved effective exposure and treatment of isolated V2 painful neuropathy. Important surgical steps to visualize the maxillary nerve and its branches and key landmarks of the pterygopalatine fossa are discussed. This minimally invasive approach appears to be a valid alternative for select patients with painful V2 trigeminal neuropathy.