The paradigm of norgestimate: a third-generation testosterone-derivative progestin with a peripheral anti-androgenic activity and the lowest risk of venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Norgestimate (NGM) is a testosterone derivative with peculiar receptor activities. AREAS COVERED: This is a narrative review of the available data on the pharmacotherapy of NGM in combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in terms of contraceptive efficacy, venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk, safety, tolerability and bleeding patterns. A comprehensive literature review was conducted in August 2020 using PubMed with the keyword 'norgestimate'. EXPERT OPINION: NGM shows a mild estrogenic activity associated with anti-mineralocorticoid and anti-androgenic properties, largely responsible for the cardiovascular safety profile. The anti-androgenic property depends on the androgen receptor (AR) nuclear translocation (AR trafficking and its subnuclear distribution), the inhibition of 5α-reductase activity (it possesses higher activity compared to other available progestins), and the increase on sexual hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels if combined with an estrogenic counterpart. NGM is one of the molecules that best modulates the power of ethinyl-estradiol on the thromboembolic risk, being associated with the lowest VTE risk between different CHCs. NGM has the advantage of retaining peripheral anti-androgenic activity, demonstrated by the impact on lipid and glucose metabolism, and it should be preferred if compared with other similar progestins of the same class of risk which are much more androgenic, such as levonorgestrel.

Comparison of a transdermal contraceptive patch with a newly sourced adhesive component versus EVRA patch: A double-blind, randomized, bioequivalence and adhesion study in healthy women.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence of norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol (NGMN-EE) and adhesion of a transdermal contraceptive patch containing a newly sourced adhesive component (test) compared with the marketed (reference) patch. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study, healthy women received single 7-day application of both test and reference patches. Treatment phase included two treatment periods of 11 days each separated by a 21-day washout period starting from day of patch removal (day 8) of treatment period 1. Assessments included NGMN and EE pharmacokinetics (PK), adhesion using European Medicines Agency (EMA) 5-point scale, irritation potential and application-site reactions, and safety. Patches were bioequivalent if 90% CIs of ratios of means of test/reference for AUC168h, AUCinf, and Css fell within 80-125%. Patch adhesion was comparable if ratios of mean cumulative adhesion percentage values of test/reference were ≥90.0%. RESULTS: Seventy women were randomized; 57 completed both treatments with ≥80% adhesion (score 0-1). Bioequivalence of test and reference patches was demonstrated as 90% CI of ratio of geometric means for AUC168h, AUCinf, and Css for NGMN and EE fell within 80-125%. Both patches had similar adhesion properties (geometric mean ratio was 100.3% [90% CI, 93.2-107.9]). Similar rates of mild-to-moderate itching (11% vs 10%) and erythema events (79% vs 74%) were reported for test and reference patches, respectively, on day 8. CONCLUSIONS: The test patch with the newly sourced adhesive component is bioequivalent to the currently marketed NGMN-EE transdermal patch and has similar adhesion and irritation potential. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: The norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol transdermal patch containing a newly sourced adhesive component is bioequivalent to the currently marketed patch for both active moieties. Both patches had similar adhesion, irritation potential, and safety profiles.

Adhesion Evaluation of AG200-15: An Investigational Transdermal Contraceptive Delivery System.

INTRODUCTION: AG200-15, an investigational transdermal contraceptive delivery system or patch, is designed to be a low-dose, non-daily, combined hormonal contraceptive option for women. In this phase 1 study, the in vivo adhesion of the AG200-15 patch was compared to Xulane®, the only contraceptive patch available in the USA. METHODS: This phase 1, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-period crossover adhesion study compared the 7-day adhesion of the AG200-15 and Xulane contraceptive patches. Eighty-three women, ages 18 to 35 years old, with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 19 kg/m2 and < 35 kg/m2, and weight ≥ 48 kg and < 90 kg were enrolled. Trained study site personnel used a five-point scale to assess patch adhesion daily. A score of 0 reflected at least 90% adhesion; while a score of 4 represented complete detachment of the patch. The primary objective was to compare the adhesion properties of the two patches; AG200-15 would be considered statistically non-inferior to Xulane if the upper 95% confidence limit (CL) of the mean difference in adhesion scores was below + 0.15. RESULTS: The overall mean (standard deviation) scores for AG200-15 (N = 78) and Xulane (N = 77) were 0.14 (0.28) and 0.39 (0.40), respectively (lower scores on the adhesion scale indicate better adhesion). The study demonstrated a difference in mean adhesion scores of - 0.24, meeting the prespecified non-inferiority criterion by demonstrating a one-sided upper CL of - 0.16. Thus, the in vivo adhesion of AG200-15 was shown to be non-inferior to that of Xulane. Most subjects experienced no skin irritation at the application site for either patch and no serious adverse event was reported in the study. CONCLUSION: The in vivo adhesion of AG200-15 is non-inferior to that of Xulane on the basis of the prespecified criterion of the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CL for the mean adhesion score difference being below + 0.15. Both patches were generally well tolerated. FUNDING: Agile Therapeutics, Inc.

A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Study of Erenumab and a Combined Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Females.

BACKGROUND: Erenumab is a human anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody developed for migraine prevention. Migraine predominately affects women of childbearing age; thus, it is important to determine potential drug-drug interactions between a common oral contraceptive and drugs used to treat migraine. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate potential drug-drug interactions between erenumab and a common oral contraceptive. METHODS: Healthy women received three cycles of a norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol-containing oral contraceptive with a single 140-mg subcutaneous dose of erenumab during cycle three. Norgestimate metabolites (norgestrel and norelgestromin) and ethinyl estradiol pharmacokinetics were evaluated in the absence and presence of erenumab. Primary endpoint was peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUCtau). Luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone concentrations were evaluated as pharmacodynamic markers. RESULTS: Erenumab did not influence the pharmacokinetics of norelgestromin, norgestrel, or ethinyl estradiol. Least-squares mean estimates (90% confidence interval) for Cmax ratios were 1.05 (0.90-1.23), 1.06 (0.97-1.16), and 1.04 (0.88-1.22) for norelgestromin, norgestrel, and ethinyl estradiol, respectively. Respective AUCtau ratios were 1.02 (0.94-1.12), 1.03 (0.96-1.10), and 1.02 (0.91-1.14). Luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone concentrations were similar after exposure to oral contraceptive alone and with erenumab. CONCLUSION: Erenumab did not alter the pharmacokinetics of the active components of an estrogen/progestin combination oral contraceptive. Thus, no change in contraceptive efficacy is expected with erenumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02792517.

Thromboembolic adverse event study of combined estrogen-progestin preparations using Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

Combined estrogen-progestin preparations (CEPs) are associated with thromboembolic (TE) side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of TE using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Adverse events recorded from April 2004 to November 2014 in the JADER database were obtained from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) website (www.pmda.go.jp). We calculated the reporting odds ratios (RORs) of suspected CEPs, analyzed the time-to-onset profile, and assessed the hazard type using Weibull shape parameter (WSP). Furthermore, we used the applied association rule mining technique to discover undetected relationships such as the possible risk factors. The total number of reported cases in the JADER contained was 338,224. The RORs (95% confidential interval, CI) of drospirenone combined with ethinyl estradiol (EE, Dro-EE), norethisterone with EE (Ne-EE), levonorgestrel with EE (Lev-EE), desogestrel with EE (Des-EE), and norgestrel with EE (Nor-EE) were 56.2 (44.3-71.4), 29.1 (23.5-35.9), 42.9 (32.3-57.0), 44.7 (32.7-61.1), and 38.6 (26.3-56.7), respectively. The medians (25%-75%) of the time-to-onset of Dro-EE, Ne-EE, Lev-EE, Des-EE, and Nor-EE were 150.0 (75.3-314.0), 128.0 (27.0-279.0), 204.0 (44.0-660.0), 142.0 (41.3-344.0), and 16.5 (8.8-32.0) days, respectively. The 95% CIs of the WSP-ß for Ne-EE, Lev-EE, and Nor-EE were lower and excluded 1. Association rule mining indicated that patients with anemia had a potential risk of developing a TE when using CEPs. Our results suggest that it is important to monitor patients administered CEP for TE. Careful observation is recommended, especially for those using Nor-EE, and this information may be useful for efficient therapeutic planning.

The pharmacokinetics of 12-week continuous contraceptive patch use.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the change in serum ethinyl estradiol (EE2) and norelgestromin (NGMN) levels over 12 weeks of continuous contraceptive patch use. STUDY DESIGN: We asked participants (n=30) to apply consecutive patches to be worn continuously (without a patch-free interval) for 12 weeks. We collected blood samples at the end of each patch week and two times during weeks 4, 8, and 12 (with the additional blood draw occurring mid-week). Liquid chromatography-tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was utilized to assess EE2 and NGMN levels. RESULTS: Twenty-seven women completed the study; 26 were compliant with patch use. Ethinyl estradiol levels ranged from 0 to 193 pg/mL over the period. We observed an accumulation over the 12-week time at an estimated rate of 2.15 pg/mL per week (95% confidence interval 0.95-3.35, p<.001). The change in NGMN levels ranged from 0 to 2.52 ng/mL over the 12 weeks (95% confidence interval 0.021-0.019, p=.915). The most common side effects reported were vaginal spotting, breast tenderness and abdominal pain/cramping. There were no serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: While the range of weekly EE2 values was quite wide, the absolute values remain low and generally within the expected range described in product labeling. Providers may consider prescribing continuous use of the patch, but given the slow accumulation of EE2 over time, 12 weeks should not be exceeded in the absence of safety data.

Nonoral combined hormonal contraceptives and thromboembolism: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs), containing estrogen and progestin, are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) compared with nonuse. Few studies have examined whether nonoral formulations (including the combined hormonal patch, combined vaginal ring and combined injectable contraceptives) increase the risk of thrombosis compared with combined oral contraceptives (COCs). OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to examine the risk of VTE and ATE among women using nonoral CHCs compared to women using COCs. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for all English language articles published from database inception through May 2016. We included primary research studies that examined women using the patch, ring or combined injectables compared with women using levonorgestrel-containing or norgestimate-containing COCs. Outcomes of interest included VTE (deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) or ATE (acute myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke). We assessed the quality of each individual piece of evidence using the system developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. Of seven analyses from six studies examining VTE among patch users compared with levonorgestrel- or norgestimate-containing COC users, two found a statistically significantly elevated risk among patch users (risk estimates 2.2-2.3), one found an elevated risk that did not meet statistical significance (risk estimate 2.0), and four found no increased risk. Of three studies examining VTE among ring users compared with levonorgestrel COC users, one found a statistically significantly elevated risk among patch users (risk estimate 1.9) and two did not. Two studies did not find an increased risk for ATE among women using the patch compared with norgestimate COCs. We did not identify any studies examining combined injectable contraceptives. CONCLUSION: Limited Level II-2 good to fair evidence demonstrated conflicting results on whether women using the patch or the ring have a higher risk of VTE than women using COCs. Evidence did not demonstrate an increased risk of ATE among women using the patch. Overall, any potential elevated risk likely represents a small number of events on a population level. Additional studies with standard methodology are needed to further clarify any associations and better understand mechanisms of hormone-induced thrombosis among users of nonoral combined hormonal contraception.

Evaluation of the effects of the weak CYP3A inhibitors atorvastatin and ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate on lomitapide pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

Lomitapide is a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor approved as an adjunctive treatment for adult patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Lomitapide is extensively metabolized via cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) and is a weak CYP3A inhibitor. Two phase 1 open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm drug interaction studies in healthy subjects assessed the effects of atorvastatin and ethinyl estradiol (EE)/norgestimate, both weak CYP3A inhibitors, on lomitapide pharmacokinetics with staggered (separated by 12 hours) or simultaneous administration. All subjects received a single dose of lomitapide (20 mg) in the evening on day 1. Atorvastatin (80 mg once daily, n = 32) or EE/norgestimate (0.035/0.25 mg once daily, n = 32) dosing was initiated on days 11 or 8, respectively, with evening (arm 1) or morning (arm 2) dosing; at steady state (days 15 or 22), a single lomitapide dose was administered; CYP3A inhibitor dosing continued for 6 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken until 168 hours postdose. With atorvastatin, lomitapide exposure was increased by approximately 2-fold and 1.3-fold, respectively, with simultaneous and staggered administration, respectively. Simultaneous and staggered EE/norgestimate and lomitapide administration resulted in an approximately 1.3-fold increase in lomitapide exposure. Reductions in lomitapide dose may be required for some patients when administered concomitantly with a weak CYP3A inhibitor.

Hypercoagulability in adolescent girls on oral contraceptives-global coagulation profile and estrogen receptor polymorphisms.

Oral contraceptive (OCP) induced changes on coagulation are complex with high inter-individual variability. The precise reason for differences in this variability is unknown. We hypothesized that global coagulation assays better delineate these changes and variability in hypercoagulability may be the result of differences in estrogen metabolism and thrombophilia. Fifty-two adolescents initiating OCPs were prospectively enrolled; 33 subjects completed the study. Samples were analyzed prior to and after OCPs for procoagulant and anticoagulant factor activities and thrombin generation (TG) +/-thrombomodulin. Participants were genotyped for common thrombophilia and estrogen receptor-α (ESR-α) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNP genotypes were compared to coagulation parameters; TG parameters and differences pre and post OCPs were examined. At baseline, a striking finding was elevated FVIII levels. FVL was absent in all and F2 G20210A was present in one participant. The ESR-α polymorphism was present in heterozygous state in 59% and homozygous state in 21% participants. There were no differences in VWF levels and FVIII: C after being on OCPs. Protein S levels decreased with OCPs. Sixty percent of participants showed evidence of hypercoagulability on TG testing on OCPs. Higher thrombin peak and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) were seen on TG after OCPs. With thrombomodulin, ETP and thrombin peak did not decrease after OCPs, signifying 'thrombomodulin resistance'. We demonstrated that OCPs induce a state of "variable" hypercoagulability in adolescents, predominantly through the protein S pathway. Genetic and nongenetic factors may account for the variable increase in hypercoagulability. Further research is needed to understand this.

Transdermal contraception methods: today's patches and new options on the horizon.

INTRODUCTION: The first contraceptive patch with ethinyl estradiol (EE) and norelgestromin in the United States demonstrated that there was a tremendous interest in topical methods, which could provide patient convenience, steady-state hormonal levels and reassurance of ongoing coverage, while maintaining efficacy and good bleeding patterns. Unfortunately, concerns about increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk diminished its popularity. Another version in Europe and Canada had slightly lower estrogen doses, but questions were raised about its VTE risk too based on its progestin. To fill that gap, two new contraceptive patches with lower estrogen levels have been developed and extensively tested. AREAS COVERED: This article provides a short overview of the first set of patches followed by discussions of the pharmacokinetics of the two experimental patches as well as the results of their clinical trials, including information about efficacy, bleeding patterns and tolerability. EXPERT OPINION: Given the recent increased use of first tier contraceptive methods (Intrauterine devices and implants), there may be interest in new patches. Price will influence their popularity. However, a new nondaily delivery system with lower estrogen levels will provide an important option to women.

Safety and tolerability of a new low-dose contraceptive patch in obese and nonobese women.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and tolerability of a new low-dose levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (LNG/EE) contraceptive patch was compared with 2 combination oral contraceptives in 2 clinical studies in which approximately 30% of enrolled participants were obese. STUDY DESIGN: Two phase 3, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trials compared the LNG/EE contraceptive patch (n = 1579) with combination oral contraceptives (n = 581) in healthy women 17-40 years of age. Combination oral contraceptives were LNG 100 µg per EE 20 µg (combination oral contraceptive 20; n = 375) or LNG 150 µg per EE 30 µg (combination oral contraceptive 30; n = 206). Safety and tolerability data from the 2 trials were evaluated in integrated safety analyses. RESULTS: Treatment-emergent adverse events of 2% or greater in the LNG/EE contraceptive patch were nasopharyngitis (5.2%), nausea (4.1%), upper respiratory infection (3.5%), headache (3.4%), sinusitis (2.9%), cervical dysplasia (2.3%), and urinary tract infection (2.1%). Including skin reaction-related treatment-emergent adverse events, the proportion of women who experienced any treatment-emergent adverse event was similar among women randomized to the contraceptive patch (47.5%), the combination oral contraceptive 20 (47.4%), or the combination oral contraceptive 30 (46.8%). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in obese vs nonobese participants in all groups. Serious adverse events occurred in less than 1% of participants in any of the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The LNG/EE contraceptive patch and combination oral contraceptives were well tolerated and associated with similar treatment-emergent adverse event incidences in obese and nonobese women.

A comparison of bleeding patterns and cycle control using two transdermal contraceptive systems: a multicenter, open-label, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate the bleeding pattern and cycle control parameters of a contraceptive patch containing 0.55 mg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 2.1 mg gestodene (GSD) compared with a patch containing 0.6 mg EE and 6 mg norelgestromin (NGMN). STUDY DESIGN: In this phase III, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial, healthy women aged 18-35 years (smokers aged 18-30 years) received either the EE/GSD patch (n=200) or the EE/NGMN patch (n=198). Treatment consisted of one patch per week for 3 weeks followed by a 7-day, patch-free interval for seven cycles. Bleeding control was assessed in two 90-day reference periods. RESULTS: In reference period 1, mean number of bleeding/spotting days was comparable across treatment groups (p>0.05). However, in reference period 2, there were fewer bleeding/spotting days in the EE/GSD patch group (15.7 versus 18.4; p<0.0001). Mean number of bleeding/spotting episodes was comparable across groups for both reference periods, but bleeding/spotting episodes were shorter for the EE/GSD patch than the EE/NGMN patch during reference period 1 (5.13 days versus 5.53 days, respectively; p<0.05) and reference period 2 (5.07 versus 5.66; p=0.0001). Both treatment groups showed a similar frequency of withdrawal bleeding episodes; however, across all seven cycles, the length of these episodes was consistently shorter with the EE/GSD patch (p<0.01). There were no notable treatment differences in intracyclic bleeding. CONCLUSION(S): Bleeding pattern and cycle control achieved with the EE/GSD patch was similar to that of the EE/NGMN patch. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: The paper presents data on the bleeding pattern and cycle control parameters of an investigational transdermal contraceptive patch containing EE and GSD compared with an approved contraceptive patch containing EE and NGMN. This descriptive study found that bleeding patterns associated with the EE/GSD patch were similar to those of an EE/NGMN patch providing higher EE exposure.

Metabolic effects of the contraceptive skin patch and subdermal contraceptive implant in Mexican women: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The contraceptive skin patch (CSP) accepted by the U.S. FDA in 2001 includes ethinylestradiol and norelgestromine, whereas the subdermal contraceptive implant (SCI) has etonogestrel and is also approved by the FDA. In Mexico, both are now widely used for contraception but their effects on Mexican population are unknown. The objective of the study was to evaluate if these treatments induce metabolic changes in a sample of indigenous and mestizo Mexican women. METHODS: An observational, prospective, longitudinal, non-randomized study of women between 18 and 35 years of age assigned to CSP or SCI. We performed several laboratory tests: clinical chemistry, lipid profile, and liver and thyroid function tests. Also, serum levels of insulin, C-peptide, IGF-1, leptin, adiponectin, and C reactive protein were assayed. RESULTS: Sixty-two women were enrolled, 25 used CSP (0 indigenous; 25 mestizos) and 37 used SCI (18 indigenous; 19 mestizos). Clinical symptoms were relatively more frequent in the SCI group. Thirty-four contraceptive users gained weight without other clinical significant changes. After 4 months of treatment, significant changes were found in some biochemical parameters in both treatment groups. Most were clinically irrelevant. Interestingly, the percentage of users with an abnormal atherogenic index diminished from 75% to 41.6% after follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The CSP slightly modified the metabolic variables. Most changes were nonsignificant, whereas for SCI users changes were more evident and perhaps beneficial. Results of this attempt to evaluate the effects of contraceptives in mestizo and native-American populations show that clinical symptoms are frequent in Mexican users of CSP and SCI. Although these medications may affect some metabolic variables, these changes seem clinically irrelevant. Induction of abnormalities in other physiological pathways cannot be ruled out.

Effect of the coadministration of daclatasvir on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate.

BACKGROUND: Daclatasvir is a highly selective NS5A replication complex inhibitor currently in development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection. Daclatasvir is active at picomolar concentrations and demonstrates in vitro activity against a broad range of HCV genotypes. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of daclatasvir on the pharmacokinetics of a combined oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate (Ortho Tri-Cyclen(®)). METHODS: In this open-label single-sequence study, 20 healthy female subjects received ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate for three cycles, with coadministration of daclatasvir in cycle 3. Pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and the active metabolites of norgestimate (norelgestromin and norgestrel) were assessed in cycles 2 and 3. RESULTS: Adjusted ratios of geometric means and 90% CIs were estimated for the maximum observed plasma concentration (ethinyl estradiol 1.11 [1.02, 1.20], norelgestromin 1.06 [0.99, 1.14] and norgestrel 1.07 [0.99, 1.16]) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (ethinyl estradiol 1.01 [0.95, 1.07], norelgestromin 1.12 [1.06, 1.17] and norgestrel 1.12 [1.02, 1.23]). CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of daclatasvir resulted in no clinically relevant effects on exposure to ethinyl estradiol, norelgestromin or norgestrel.

Hormone withdrawal-associated symptoms: comparison of oestradiol valerate/dienogest versus ethinylestradiol/norgestimate.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of oestradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG) versus ethinylestradiol/norgestimate (EE/NGM) on hormone-withdrawal associated symptoms (HWAS) in otherwise healthy women who had experienced at least one of these symptoms when using 21/7-day combined oral contraceptives (COCs). METHODS: This phase III, parallel-group study randomised 409 women aged 18 to 50 years to E2V/DNG or EE/NGM. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to cycle 6 in the average of the three highest visual analogue scale values for headache and/or pelvic pain during cycle days 22 to 28. RESULTS: In total, 395 were included in the full analysis set (E2V/DNG, n = 191; EE/NGM, n = 204). E2V/DNG reduced the symptoms of headache or pelvic pain during cycle days 22 to 28 from baseline to cycle 6 to a significantly greater extent than EE/NGM (mean decrease 43.6 vs. 35.5 mm; p = 0.0024). Both treatments were well tolerated with a similar proportion of women experiencing adverse events that were considered at least possibly related to treatment (35% E2V/DNG vs. 34% EE/NGM). CONCLUSIONS: E2V/DNG reduces the frequency and intensity of headache and pelvic pain to a greater extent than EE/NGM, and may be a good option for women susceptible to HWAS with conventional 21/7-day COCs.

Mood and physical symptoms improve in women with severe cyclical changes by taking an oral contraceptive containing 250-mcg norgestimate and 35-mcg ethinyl estradiol.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate how women without and with different severity of premenstrual symptoms react to treatment with a combined oral contraceptive containing 250-mcg norgestimate/35-mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE). Focus was placed on mood and physical symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: This open, prospective study evaluated 24 women using norgestimate/EE for three cycles in a 21/7 regimen. Symptoms and bleeding pattern were captured by daily ratings on the Cyclicity Diagnoser scale. RESULTS: Women with severe premenstrual mood symptoms improved in summarized negative mood (p<.001) and summarized positive mood (p<.05), as well as in swelling (p<.05) and effect on daily life (p<.05). Women with no or mild or moderate symptoms did not show any significant improvement or deterioration in any symptom after 3 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Norgestimate 250 mcg/EE 35 mcg significantly improved premenstrual summarized negative mood symptoms during 3 treatment months compared to pretreatment in women with severe premenstrual symptoms, together with improvement in positive symptoms, swelling and effect on daily life.

Recent combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) and the risk of thromboembolism and other cardiovascular events in new users.

BACKGROUND: Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) place women at increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) and arterial thrombotic events (ATEs), including acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. There is concern that three recent CHC preparations [drospirenone-containing pills (DRSPs), the norelgestromin-containing transdermal patch (NGMN) and the etonogestrel vaginal ring (ETON)] may place women at even higher risk of thrombosis than other older low-dose CHCs with a known safety profile. STUDY DESIGN: All VTEs and all hospitalized ATEs were identified in women, ages 10-55 years, from two integrated health care programs and two state Medicaid programs during the time period covering their new use of DRSP, NGMN, ETON or one of four low-dose estrogen comparator CHCs. The relative risk of thrombotic and thromboembolic outcomes associated with the newer CHCs in relation to the comparators was assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for age, site and year of entry into the study. RESULTS: The hazards ratio for DRSP in relation to low-dose estrogen comparators among new users was 1.77 (95% confidence interval 1.33-2.35) for VTE and 2.01 (1.06-3.81) for ATE. The increased risk of DRSP was limited to the 10-34-year age group for VTE and the 35-55-year group for ATE. Use of the NGMN patch and ETON vaginal ring was not associated with increased risk of either thromboembolic or thrombotic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In new users, DRSP was associated with higher risk of thrombotic events (VTE and ATE) relative to low-dose estrogen comparator CHCs, while the use of the NGMN patch and ETON vaginal ring was not.

Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of venous thrombosis in current users of non-oral hormonal contraception. DESIGN: Historical national registry based cohort study. SETTING: Four national registries in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: All Danish non-pregnant women aged 15-49 (n=1,626,158), free of previous thrombotic disease or cancer, were followed from 2001 to 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate of venous thrombosis in users of transdermal, vaginal, intrauterine, or subcutaneous hormonal contraception, relative risk of venous thrombosis compared with non-users, and rate ratios of venous thrombosis in current users of non-oral products compared with the standard reference oral contraceptive with levonorgestrel and 30-40 µg oestrogen. Diagnoses were confirmed by at least four weeks of anticoagulation therapy after the diagnosis. RESULTS: Within 9,429,128 woman years of observation, 5287 first ever venous thrombosis events were recorded, of which 3434 were confirmed. In non-users of hormonal contraception the incidence rate of confirmed events was 2.1 per 10,000 woman years. Compared with non-users of hormonal contraception, and after adjustment for age, calendar year, and education, the relative risk of confirmed venous thrombosis in users of transdermal combined contraceptive patches was 7.9 (95% confidence interval 3.5 to 17.7) and of the vaginal ring was 6.5 (4.7 to 8.9). The corresponding incidences per 10,000 exposure years were 9.7 and 7.8 events. The relative risk was increased in women who used subcutaneous implants (1.4, 0.6 to 3.4) but not in those who used the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (0.6, 0.4 to 0.8). Compared with users of combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, the adjusted relative risk of venous thrombosis in users of transdermal patches was 2.3 (1.0 to 5.2) and of the vaginal ring was 1.9 (1.3 to 2.7). CONCLUSION: Women who use transdermal patches or vaginal rings for contraception have a 7.9 and 6.5 times increased risk of confirmed venous thrombosis compared with non-users of hormonal contraception of the same age, corresponding to 9.7 and 7.8 events per 10,000 exposure years. The risk was slightly increased in women using subcutaneous implants but not in those using the levonorgestrel intrauterine system.

Combined hormonal contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: putting the risks into perspective.

To date, 13 studies have provided data on the risk of venous thromboembolism associated with combined oral contraceptives containing drospirenone or the norelgestromin-containing contraceptive patch. The studies varied in their conclusions about whether these methods are associated with higher risks than combined oral contraceptives containing other progestins: the primary reported measures of association (adjusted odds ratios, incidence rate ratios, or hazard ratios) ranged from 0.9 to 3.3. All of the studies had weaknesses in population selection, data validity or completeness, or analysis that may have led to biased or spurious findings. Venous thromboembolism is rare; if the contraceptive methods of interest do confer a higher risk of thromboembolism, only an additional 5-10 per 10,000 users per year would be affected. The important message for patients, clinicians, and policy makers is that the benefits of all contraceptive methods markedly outweigh their risks, primarily because they prevent pregnancy, an inherently hazardous condition. Product labels for hormonal contraceptives should emphasize their substantial health benefits and established safety.