Interocular conflict from a monocular augmented reality display: Impact of visual characteristics on performance.

In monocular see-through augmented reality systems, each eye is stimulated differently by a monocular image that is superimposed on the binocular background. This can impair binocular fusion, due to interocular conflict. As a function of visual characteristics, the latter can have a greater or lesser impact on user comfort and performance. This study tested several visual characteristics of a binocular background and a monocular element during an exposure that reproduced the interocular conflict induced by a monocular see-through near-eye display. The aim was to identify which factors impact the user's performance. Performance was measured as target tracking and event detection, identification, fixation time, and latency. Our results demonstrate that performance is a function of the binocular background. Furthermore, exogenous attentional stimulation, in the form of a pulse with different levels of contrast applied to the monocular display, appears to preserve performance in most background conditions.

Visual Acuity Testing for Telehealth Using Mobile Applications.

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic illustrates the increasingly important role of telemedicine as a method of clinician-patient interaction. However, electronic applications (apps) for the testing of ophthalmology vital signs, such as visual acuity, can be published and used without any verification of accuracy, validity, or reliability. Objective: To reassess the accuracy of visual acuity-testing apps and assess their viability for telehealth. Design, Setting, and Participants: The US Apple App Store was queried for apps for visual acuity testing. Anticipated optotype size for various visual acuity lines were calculated and compared against the actual measured optotype size on 4 different Apple hardware devices. No human participants were part of this study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean (SD) errors were calculated per device and across multiple devices. Results: On iPhones, 10 apps met inclusion criteria, with mean errors ranging from 0.2% to 109.9%. On the iPads, 9 apps met inclusion criteria, with mean errors ranging from 0.2% to 398.1%. Six apps met criteria and worked on both iPhone and iPad, with mean errors from 0.2% to 249.5%. Of the 6 apps that worked across devices, the top 3 most accurate apps were Visual Acuity Charts (mean [SD] error, 0.2% [0.0%]), Kay iSight Test Professional (mean [SD] error, 3.5% [0.7%]), and Smart Optometry (mean [SD] error, 15.9% [4.3%]). None of the apps tested were ideal for telemedicine, because some apps displayed accurate optotype size, while others displayed the same letters on separate devices; no apps exhibited both characteristics. Conclusions and Relevance: Both Visual Acuity Charts and Kay iSight Test Professional had low mean (SD) errors and functionality across all tested devices, but no apps were suitable for telemedicine. This suggests that new and/or improved visual acuity-testing apps are necessary for optimal telemedicine use.

Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children.

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of an open-view binocular handheld aberrometer (QuickSee) for diagnosing refractive errors in children. METHODS: 123 school-age children (9.9 ± 3.3 years) with moderate refractive error underwent autorefraction (AR) with a standard desktop device and subjective refraction (SR), with or without cycloplegia to determine their eyeglass prescription. Measurements with QuickSee (QS) were taken in 62 of these patients without cycloplegia (NC), and in 61 under cycloplegia (C). Differences in refraction values (AR vs SR vs QS) as well as the visual acuity (VA) achieved by the patients with each method (QS vs SR) were used to evaluate the performance of the device in measuring refractive error. RESULTS: The spherical equivalent refraction obtained by QS agreed within 0.5 D of the SR in 71% (NC) and 70% (C) of the cases. Agreement between the desktop autorefractor and SR for the same threshold was of 61% (NC) and 77% (C). VA resulting from QS refractions was equal to or better than that achieved by SR procedure in 77% (NC) and 74% (C) of the patients. Average improvement in VA with the QS refractions was of 8.6 and 13.4 optotypes for the NC and C groups respectively, while the SR procedure provided average improvements of 8.9 (NC) and 14.8 (C) optotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The high level of agreement between QuickSee and subjective refraction together with the VA improvement achieved in both study groups using QuickSee refractions suggest that the device is a useful autorefraction tool for school-age children.

Is 25Hz enough to accurately measure a dynamic change in the ocular accommodation?

BACKGROUND: Accommodation is often recorded at a low sampling rate using devices such as autorefractors that are designed to measure the static refractive error. It is therefore important to determine if that resolution is sufficient to accurately measure the dynamic properties of accommodation. The current study provides both theoretical and empirical evidence on the ideal sampling rate necessary to measure a dynamic response. METHODS: Accommodative and disaccommodative step stimuli ranging from 1-3D (1D steps) were presented using a Badal optical system. Responses from 12 children (8-13 years) and 6 adults (20-35 years) were recorded using a dynamic photorefractor (DPR). Fast Fourier transformation was applied to the unsmoothed dynamic responses including position, velocity and acceleration. Also, velocity and acceleration main sequence (MS) characteristics were compared between three photorefractor conditions on 3 subjects. RESULTS: The Nyquist sampling limit necessary to accurately estimate position, velocity and acceleration was at least 5, 10 and 70Hz, respectively. Peak velocity and acceleration were significantly underestimated at a lower rate (p<0.5). However, the slope of MS remained invariant with sampling rate (p>0.5). CONCLUSION: Contrary to the previous findings, a dynamic accommodative response exhibited frequencies larger than 10Hz. Stimulus direction and amplitude had no influence on the frequencies present in the dynamic response. Peak velocity and acceleration can be significantly underestimated when sampled at a lower rate. Taken as a whole, low sampling rate instruments can accurately estimate static accommodation, however, caution needs to be exercised when using them for dynamic accommodation.

Influence of glaucoma surgery on the ocular surface using oculus keratograph.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy on the ocular surface. DESIGN: Retrospective, case-control study. METHODS: Eighty-one samples without dry eyes were recruited and divided into three groups, including phacoemulsification group (N = 30) as control group, trabeculectomy group (N = 27) and phacotrabeculectomy group (N = 24) as study groups. Ocular surface parameters, including noninvasive keratograph first (NifBUT) and average (NiaBUT) tear film breakup time, tear meniscus height (TMH) and corneal fluorescein stain (CFS), were estimated preoperatively, at 3 days, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively using oculus keratograph. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in ocular surface parameters at baseline among three groups (p > 0.05). The magnitude of NifBUT and NiaBUT was reduced at 3 days and 1 month postoperatively in phacotrabeculectomy group, but greater than that in the other two groups (All p < 0.001). In all the groups, both the NifBUT and NiaBUT tended to recover at 1 and 3 months postoperatively, whereas both of them did not recover to baseline at 3 months postoperatively in trabeculectomy (NifBUT, p = 0.001; NiaBUT, p < 0.001) and phacotrabeculectomy group (NifBUT, p < 0.001; NiaBUT, p = 0.020). TMH was raised at 3 days postoperatively and restored to the baseline level at 1 and 3 months postoperatively for three groups (p > 0.05). CFS was elevated at 3 days postoperatively and different in recovery at 1 and 3 months postoperatively for three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of phacotrabeculectomy on ocular surface is worse than that of trabeculectomy for the short run and is not distinct different for a long time.

Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.

PURPOSE: To investigate a new algorithm to perform an automated non-cycloplegic refraction in adults. METHODS: Fifty healthy subjects were measured twice (test-retest) with the new automated subjective refraction method and with the conventional clinician subjective refraction procedure. Objective refraction was also measured with the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 autorefractor. The new automated method was inspired on the root finding bisection algorithm and on the Euclidean distances in the power vector domain. The algorithm was implemented in a computer that was synchronized with a customized motorized phoropter. Repeatability was mainly assessed with the within-subject standard deviation (Sw) and accuracy was mainly assessed with the limits of agreement. RESULTS: The within-subject standard deviations of the power vector components (M, J0, J45) obtained for the right eye are (±0.13, ±0.04, ±0.05)D and (±0.17, ±0.03, ±0.07)D, respectively, for the clinical and the automated subjective refraction methods. The limits of agreement (with the clinical method) for the automated and the objective methods are, respectively (±0.56, ±0.18, ±0.31)D and (±0.77, ±0.15, ±0.18)D. Similar results are obtained for the left eye. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed automated method is repeatable and more accurate than objective techniques in healthy adults. However, it is not accurate enough to replace the clinical subjective refraction yet and it should be tested in a wider population in terms of age, refraction and different ocular conditions. Despite these important limitations, this method has been shown to be a potentially valuable method to improve the access to primary eye care services in developing countries.

A standardized protocol for quantification of saccadic eye movements: DEMoNS.

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative saccadic testing is a non-invasive method of evaluating the neural networks involved in the control of eye movements. The aim of this study is to provide a standardized and reproducible protocol for infrared oculography measurements of eye movements and analysis, which can be applied for various diseases in a multicenter setting. METHODS: Development of a protocol to Demonstrate Eye Movement Networks with Saccades (DEMoNS) using infrared oculography. Automated analysis methods were used to calculate parameters describing the characteristics of the saccadic eye movements. The two measurements of the subjects were compared with descriptive and reproducibility statistics. RESULTS: Infrared oculography measurements of all subjects were performed using the DEMoNS protocol and various saccadic parameters were calculated automatically from 28 subjects. Saccadic parameters such as: peak velocity, latency and saccade pair ratios showed excellent reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.9). Parameters describing performance of more complex tasks showed moderate to good reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficients 0.63-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a standardized and transparent protocol for measuring and analyzing saccadic eye movements in a multicenter setting. The DEMoNS protocol details outcome measures for treatment trial which are of excellent reproducibility. The DEMoNS protocol can be applied to the study of saccadic eye movements in various neurodegenerative and motor diseases.

Does air gas aesthesiometry generate a true mechanical stimulus for corneal sensitivity measurement?

BACKGROUND: Belmonte Ocular Pain Meter (OPM) air jet aesthesiometry overcomes some of the limitations of the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. However, for true mechanical corneal sensitivity measurement, the airflow stimulus temperature of the aesthesiometer must equal ocular surface temperature (OST), to avoid additional response from temperature-sensitive nerves. The aim of this study was to determine: (A) the stimulus temperature inducing no or least change in OST; and (B) to evaluate if OST remains unchanged with different stimulus durations and airflow rates. METHODS: A total of 14 subjects (mean age 25.14 ± 2.18 years; seven women) participated in this clinical cohort study: (A) OST was recorded using an infrared camera (FLIR A310) during the presentation of airflow stimuli, at five temperatures, ambient temperature (AT) +5°C, +10°C, +15°C, +20°C and +30°C, using the OPM aesthesiometer (duration three seconds; over a four millimetre distance; airflow rate 60 ml/min); and (B) OST measurements were repeated with two stimulus temperatures (AT +10°C and +15°C) while varying stimulus durations (three seconds and five seconds) and airflow rates (30, 60, 80 and 100 ml/min). Inclusion criteria were age <40 years, no contact lens wear, absence of ocular disease including dry eye, and no use of artificial tears. Repeated measures (analysis of variance) and appropriate post-hoc t-tests were applied. RESULTS: (A) Stimulus temperatures of AT +10°C and +15°C induced the least changes in OST (-0.20 ± 0.13°C and 0.08 ± 0.05°C). (B) OST changes were statistically significant with both stimulus temperatures and increased with increasing airflow rates (p < 0.001), and were more marked with stimulus temperature AT +10°C. CONCLUSION: A true mechanical threshold for corneal sensitivity cannot be established with the air stimulus of the Belmonte OPM because its air jet stimulus with mechanical setting is likely to have a thermal component. Appropriate stimulus selection for an air jet aesthesiometer must incorporate stimulus temperature control that can vary with stimulus duration and airflow rate.

Surround Propinquity and Tonic Accommodation.

PURPOSE: Previous studies of dark focus have found evidence of a propinquity response, in which subjects accommodate to the perceived distance of their surroundings despite being in absolute darkness. Their distance perception in a lighted room allows a spatial representation to persist within the darkened room. This study sought to establish the significance and magnitude of the propinquity response in a large sample of young adults, and to determine whether the propinquity response can be predicted by a subject's initial dark focus in an unknown dark room. METHODS: Dark focus was measured with a dynamic infrared optometer (Plusoptix PowerRef 3) in 30 young adult subjects, 26 of whom were naive to the testing room and its dimensions. Dark focus was then measured at varying dioptric wall distances of 0.25-4D. The subject viewed the lighted room before each measurement. For each individual, the dark focus was plotted as a function of dioptric wall distance. The slope of this function was used as a measure of the propinquity response. RESULTS: The mean initial dark focus value was 1.05D (SD 1.04D) for the 26 naive subjects. The mean slope of the plot of dark focus as a function of dioptric wall distance was small (+0.097), yet highly statistically significant (P = .0002). The propinquity response function showed no statistically significant quadratic or cubic trends, and so may be considered linear. No statistically significant correlation was found between naive dark focus and propinquity response (r = +0.246, P = .226). CONCLUSIONS: Propinquity seems to be a small but statistically significant factor in dark focus measurements. Though it is unlikely to contaminate tonic accommodation measurements in large samples under normal laboratory conditions, a minority of individuals exhibit large propinquity responses equal to that of proximal accommodation in lighted conditions.

Effect of apparent depth cues on accommodation in a Badal optometer.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to analyse the effect of peripheral depth cues on accommodation in Badal optometers. METHODS: Monocular refractions at 0.17 and 5.00 D of accommodative stimulus were measured with the PowerRef II autorefractor (Plusoptix Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA). Subjects looked (randomly) at four different scenes, one real scene comprising familiar objects at different depth planes (Real) and three virtual scenes comprising different two-dimensional pictures seen through a Badal lens. The first image consisted of a photograph of the real scene taken in conditions that closely mimic a healthy standard human eye performance (out-of-focus [OoF] blur); the second image was the same photograph rendered with a depth of focus to infinity (OoF sharpness); and finally the third image consisted of a fixation target and a even white surrounding (White). In all cases the field of view was 25.0° and the fixation target was a Maltese cross subtending to two degrees. RESULTS: Twenty-eight right eyes from healthy young subjects were measured. The achieved statistical power was 0.9. At 5.00 D of accommodative stimulus, the repeated measures analysis of variance was statistically significant (p < 0.05) and the corresponding Bonferroni post hoc tests showed the following mean accommodative response differences and standard deviation (p-value) between the real and the virtual scenes: real-white =-0.66 ± 0.92 D (p < 0.01); real-OoF sharpness = -0.43 ± 0.88 D (p = 0.07); real-OoF blur =-0.25 ± 0.93 D (p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: A stimulus poor in depth cues inaccurately stimulates accommodation in Badal optometers; however, accommodation can be significantly improved in the same Badal optometer, when displaying a realistic image rich in peripheral depth cues, even though these peripheral cues (also referred to as retinal blur cues) are shown in the same plane as the fixation target. These results have important implications in stereoscopic virtual reality systems that fail to represent appropriately retinal blur.

Accommodation stimulus and response determinations with autorefractors.

PURPOSE: To develop equations for accommodation stimulus and accommodation response with autorefractors when the accommodation stimulus is produced by combinations of object distances and lenses placed in front of eyes, and to give worked examples using these equations. METHODS: Simple ray tracing was used to determine stimulus and response equations, taking into account the reference positions for targets, for refraction, and for autorefractor readings. RESULTS: Several examples applying equations are provided. Features of these examples include evaluating approximate calculations that have been used previously, demonstrating which equations should be used in different circumstances, how to substitute numbers into equations, how to deal with discrepancies between subjective and objective refraction, and how to deal with astigmatism. Problems associated with measuring accommodation response by placing lenses in front of the eye are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate equations for accommodation stimulus and accommodation response for a range of accommodation stimuli in different setups have been developed.

Does the Badal optometer stimulate accommodation accurately?

PURPOSE: To study whether the accommodation response to Badal optometer is equivalent to the response for real space targets. METHODS: Accommodative responses were measured for 28 young eyes with the WAM-5500 autorefractometer in eight configurations for 0.17 D, 2.0 D and 5.0 D accommodation stimuli. Parameters that might contribute to differences in response were systematically isolated: stimulation method (real space vs Badal targets), field of view, instrument's cover proximity, the looming effect, and the peripheral interposition of objects in depth. RESULTS: Mean accommodative response differences between a natural view configuration and a configuration with a Badal Optometer were 0.50 ± 0.43 D and 0.58 ± 0.53 D for 2.0 D and 5.0 D stimulation, respectively (p < 0.001), with accommodation lags for the latter condition. Of the isolated parameters that might contribute to these differences, varying the interposition of objects in depth affected accommodation response more markedly. CONCLUSIONS: It is likely that Badal optometers affect accommodation through a combination of some or all of the studied parameters. We conclude that accommodation response to closed-view Badal optometers is not equivalent to real space target response.

Stereoscopic Viewing Can Induce Changes in the CA/C Ratio.

PURPOSE: Stereoscopic displays challenge the neural cross-coupling between accommodation and vergence by inducing a constant accommodative demand and a varying vergence demand. Stereoscopic viewing calls for a decrease in the gain of vergence accommodation, which is the accommodation caused by vergence, quantified by using the convergence-accommodation to convergence (CA/C) ratio. However, its adaptability is still a subject of debate. METHODS: Cross-coupling (CA/C and AC/A ratios) and tonic components of vergence and accommodation were assessed in 12 participants (27.5 ± 5 years, stereoacuity better than 60 arc seconds, 6/6 acuity with corrected refractive error) before and after a 20-minute exposure to stereoscopic viewing. During stimulation, vergence demand oscillated from 1 to 3 meter angles along a virtual sagittal line in sinusoidal movements, while accommodative demand was fixed at 1.5 diopters. RESULTS: Results showed a decreased CA/C ratio (-10.36%, df = 10, t = 2.835, P = 0.018), with no change in the AC/A ratio (P = 0.090), tonic vergence (P = 0.708), and tonic accommodation (P = 0.493). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that the CA/C ratio can exhibit adaptive adjustments. The observed nature and amount of the oculomotor modification failed to compensate for the stereoscopic constraint.

[Accuracy of three common optometry methods in examination of refraction in juveniles].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of the three methods of Suresight handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy in examination of juveniles patients with or without cycloplegia.
 METHODS: Firstly, 156 eyes of 78 juveniles (5 to 17 years old) were examined by using WelchAllyn Suresight handheld autorefractor and NIDEK ARK-510A table-mounted autorefractor with or without cycloplegia; secondly, retinoscopy was performed with cycloplegia.
 RESULTS: The spherical power measured by methods without cycloplegia were significantly greater than those measured with cycloplegia (P<0.05); without cycloplegia, there was no significant difference in spherical power, cylindrical power and cylindrical axis between Suresight handheld autorefractor and retinoscopy (P>0.05). These results were highly consistent, suggesting a tendency towards a short sight. However, the spherical power and cylindrical power measured by table-mounted autorefractor was significantly different (P<0.05); with cycloplegia, there was significant difference in spherical power between Suresight handheld autorefractor and retinoscopy (P<0.05).
 CONCLUSION: Cycloplegic retinoscopy is necessary for juvenile refraction examination. Under natural pupil situation, Suresight handheld autorefractor is better than table-mounted autorefractor, though both show a myopia tendency. Nevertheless, table-mounted autorefractor can be taken as a recommendation for the prescription of lens trial. As a strong reference for subjective optometry, retinoscopy should be the gold standard for measuring refractive errors.

Reliability of power profiles measured on NIMO TR1504 (Lambda-X) and effects of lens decentration for single vision, bifocal and multifocal contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of power profiles measured on NIMO TR1504 (Lambda-X, Belgium) and investigate the effects of lens decentration on the power profiles for single vision (SV), bifocal (BF) and multifocal (MF) contact lenses. METHODS: Accuracy of the sphere power was evaluated using single vision BK-7 calibration glass lenses of six minus and six plus powers. Three SV and four BF/MF contact lenses - three lenses each, were measured five times to calculate the coefficients of repeatability (COR) of the instrument. The COR was computed for each chord position, lens design, prescription power and operator. One lens from each type was measured with a deliberate decentration up to ±0.5mm in 0.1mm steps. RESULTS: For all lenses, the COR varied across different regions of the half-chord position. In general, SV lenses showed lower COR compared to the BF/MF group lenses. There were no noticeable trends of COR between prescription powers for SV and BF/MF lenses. The shape of the power profiles was not affected when lenses were deliberately decentered for all SV and PureVision MF lenses. However, for Acuvue BF lenses, the peak to trough amplitude of the power profiles flattened up to 1.00D. CONCLUSION: The COR across the half-chord of the optic zone diameter was mostly within clinical relevance except for the central 0.5mm half-chord position. COR were dependent on the lens type, whereby BF/MF group produced higher COR than SV lenses. The effects of deliberate decentration on the shape of power profiles were pronounced for lenses where the profiles had sharp transitions of power.

Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults: an update.

PURPOSE: The Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 is an open view autorefractor that superseded the Canon R-1 autorefractor in the mid-1990 s and has been used widely in optometry and vision science laboratories. It has been used to measure refractive error, accommodation responses both statically and dynamically, off-axis refractive error, and adapted to measure pupil size. This paper presents an overview of the original 2001 clinical evaluation of the SRW-5000 in adults (Mallen et al., Ophthal Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 101) and provides an update on the use and modification of the instrument since the original publication. RECENT FINDINGS: The SRW-5000 instrument, and the family of devices which followed, have shown excellent validity, repeatability, and utility in clinical and research settings. The instruments have also shown great potential for increased research functionality following a number of modifications. SUMMARY: The SRW-5000 and its derivatives have been, and continue to be, of significant importance in our drive to understand myopia progression, myopia control techniques, and oculomotor function in human vision.

PRESBYOPIA OPTOMETRY METHOD BASED ON DIOPTER REGULATION AND CHARGE COUPLE DEVICE IMAGING TECHNOLOGY.

With the development of photoelectric technology and single-chip microcomputer technology, objective optometry, also known as automatic optometry, is becoming precise. This paper proposed a presbyopia optometry method based on diopter regulation and Charge Couple Device (CCD) imaging technology and, in the meantime, designed a light path that could measure the system. This method projects a test figure to the eye ground and then the reflected image from the eye ground is detected by CCD. The image is then automatically identified by computer and the far point and near point diopters are determined to calculate lens parameter. This is a fully automatic objective optometry method which eliminates subjective factors of the tested subject. Furthermore, it can acquire the lens parameter of presbyopia accurately and quickly and can be used to measure the lens parameter of hyperopia, myopia and astigmatism.

[Observation of orthokeratology discontinuation].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the change of teenagers with short-time and long-time orthokeratology discontinuation, including diopters, corneal curvature, corneal topography, axial length, and central corneal thickness, and to investigate the refractive correction methods after long-time orthokeratology discontinuation. METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 141 patients (257 eyes) with a history of wearing and discontinuing wearing orthokeratology lenses in our center were collected. According to the spherical equivalent diopters, the patients were divided into two groups (< or = -4.00 D for group I and -4.00 D for group II). Each group was further divided into two sub-groups by the discontinuation time (1 to 3 months for sub-group A and more than 3 months for sub-group B). Four sub-groups were named as I A, II A, I B, and II B. Some optical examinations were performed for the patients before orthokeratology lens wearing and after orthokeratology discontinuation, such as refraction, corneal curvature, corneal topography, corneal endothelial cells, axial length, and central corneal thickness measurement. The refractive correction methods used by patients who had long-term orthokeratology discontinuation were recorded. The observed data were analyzed with paired t-test and one-way ANOVA by SPSS16. RESULTS: The statistically significant changes (t = 3.222, 3.404, 3.141, 5.012, P < 0.05) of spherical diopter values were (-0.31 +/- 0.58) D, (-0.48 +/- 0.68) D, (-0.35 +/- 0.65) D, and (-0.57 +/- 0.58) D for groups IA, IB, IIA, and IIB, respectively. astigmatism of the four sub-groups had no significant change (P > 0.05) The average annual spherical growth was (-0.08 +/- 0.17) D, (-0.12 +/- 0.17) D, (-0.07 +/- 0.19) D, and (-0.15 +/- 0.16) D, respectively, for the four sub-groups, and there was no statistically significant difference among them (F = 1.180, P > 0.05). Compared to the state before wearing orthokeratology lenses, the corneal curvature measured by an autorefractor was statistically different for groups I A and I A, but not statistically different for groups I B and II B. For the long-time discontinuation groups, only the SRI of the corneal topography had a statistically significant decrease compared to the value before wearing orthokeratology lenses, and others had no significant change. The average annual increase of axial length was (0.22 +/- 0.16) mm and (0.16 +/- 0.10) mm for groups IA and IB, respectively, and the increase was statistically significant (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two sub-groups (F = 1.908, P > 0.05). The central corneal thickness had no significant change (t = 1.971, 2.017, P > 0.05). The rates of the refractive correction methods after long-time discontinuation were 36.7%, 22.4%, 22.4%, 12.4%, and 6.1% for spectacles, rigid gas permeable contact lenses, soft contact lenses, either spectacles or soft contact lenses, and refractive operations, respectively. CONCLUSION: The corneal morphology and central corneal thickness returned to the original after three months of discontinuation of orthokeratology. The myopia had no significant growth after discontinuation, and there was no significant difference between low to moderate and relatively high myopia.