Advance care planning in patients undergoing surgery to resect pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Underlying tension between balancing hope and realism.

BACKGROUND: The timing and the dose of Advanced Care Planning in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing curative-intent resection are generally dictated by the surgeon performing the operation. METHODS: A qualitative investigation using 1:1 interviews with 40 open-ended questions was conducted with a convenience sample of 10 high-volume pancreatic surgeons from across the country. The grounded theory approach was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10 interviews were conducted with expert pancreatic surgeons-6 males and 4 females. During preoperative counseling, all surgeons attempt to motivate patients by emphasizing hope, optimism, and the fact that surgery offers the only opportunity for cure. All surgeons discuss the possibility of recurrence as well as postoperative complications; however, a majority perceived that patients do not fully appreciate the likelihood of recurrence or postoperative complications. All surgeons acknowledged the importance of end-of-life conversations when death is imminent. Seventy percent of surgeons had mixed opinions regarding benefits of preoperative Advanced Care Planning in the preoperative setting, while 20% felt it was definitely beneficial, particularly that delivery of care aligned with patient goals. All surgeons emphasized that Advanced Care Planning should be led by a physician who both knows the patient well and understands the nuances of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma management. Most common barriers to in-depth Advanced Care Planning discussion reported by surgeons include taking away hope, lack of time, and concern for sending "mixed messages." CONCLUSION: We identified that surgeons experience a fundamental tension between promoting realistic long-term goals and expectations versus focusing on hope and enabling an overly optimistic perception of prognosis.

Psychosocial outcomes 1-year post total pancreatectomy and autologous islet cell transplant.

BACKGROUND: A paucity of research regarding the psychosocial outcomes after TPIAT exists. METHODS: Adults (>18 years), adolescents (13-18 years), and children (5-12 years) with their parents were administered questionnaires at the time of evaluation for TPIAT and 1-year postsurgery to assess psychosocial outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 13 adults (6 male, 46%; mean age 35.2 years) and 9 children/adolescents (4 female, 44.4%; mean age 11.78 years) with CP were included in the study. A total of 69.2% of the adults and 66.7% of the children and adolescents were insulin dependent at 1-year postsurgery. In adults, improvements on the SF-36 pain (p = .001) and general health (p = .045) subscales were generally observed 1-year postsurgery. Adult patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery compared to open surgery specifically reported better general health on the SF-36 (p < .05) at 1 year. For children and adolescents, reductions in average pain in the last week (p < .05), pain interference (p < .001), and fatigue were observed (p < .05) at 1-year postsurgery. For the entire sample, using repeated measures ANOVA and covarying for age, significant differences were found 1-year postsurgery in average pain in the last week (p = .034) and pain interference with the following categories: general activity (p < .001), walking (p = .04), normal work (p = .003), sleep (p = .002), and enjoyment in life (p = .007). CONCLUSIONS: While few transplant centers offer this treatment, the improvement in quality of life suggests this may be a viable treatment option for those with CP complicated by intractable pain. (IRB Approval PRO 19080302).

Diagnosis of Depression is Associated with Readmission Following Elective Pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of depression may be associated with adverse outcomes following surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate whether depression is associated with an increased readmission rate following elective pancreatectomy, which is currently unknown. METHODS: The 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to evaluate whether diagnosis of depression was associated with 30-day readmission following elective pancreatectomy in adult patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were adjusted for clustering by facility. A secondary analysis was performed to evaluate whether the risk of diagnosis of depression on 30-day readmission rates was modified by length of stay (median 8 days). All multivariate models were adjusted for patient-level characteristics. RESULTS: There were an estimated 11,992 patients who underwent elective pancreatectomy. Mean age was 63 years, and 48.9% were male. Approximately 10.2% (n = 1223) had diagnosis of depression. Depression was associated with higher odds of 30-day readmission following elective pancreatectomy on univariate [odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.59; P = 0.043] and multivariate analyses (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.01-1.65; P = 0.039). Although length of stay > 8 days was independently associated with higher odds of 30-day readmission (P = 0.005), length of stay did not alter the association between diagnosis of depression and odds of readmission (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of depression was associated with higher odds of 30-day readmission following pancreatectomy, regardless of length of stay. Enhanced focus on evaluation and optimization of perioperative mental health is warranted to identify patients at high risk for readmission and reduce the burden related to readmission following pancreatic surgery.

Psychological Outcomes and Quality of Life in Relation to Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review.

This review aimed to inventory and analyze previous studies regarding quality of life (QoL) and psychological outcomes in relation to pancreatectomy. PubMed and PsycInfo databases were reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Thirteen studies were selected, 9 of which focused on the QoL after surgery. Quality of life significantly improved 3 to 6 months after surgery. Regarding the postoperative experience, one study reported high fear of recurrence of cancer, whereas another emphasized various expressions of patient needs. One study explained how strategy and ability to adapt are not related to the type, the cause, nor the physical condition, but are mainly influenced by the age and the subjective experience of the patients. A last study showed that depression did not affect survival rate after surgery. Our systematic review found only few studies regarding the psychological condition after pancreatectomy and highlights the need to describe and characterize the patients' psychological characteristics in this setting.

Race and Health Disparities in Patient Refusal of Surgery for Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer: An NCDB Cohort Study.

AIM: To identify factors associated with refusal of surgery in patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer and estimate the impact of this decision on survival. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base, 26,358 patients were identified with potentially resectable tumors (pretreatment clinical stage I: T1 or T2 N0M0). Multivariate models were employed to identify factors predicting failure to undergo surgery and assess the impact on survival. RESULTS: Of early-stage patients who were recommended surgery, 7.8% (N = 992) refused surgery for resectable early-stage pancreatic cancer. On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to refuse surgery if they were older [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.19], female (OR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.33-1.73), African American (vs White, OR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.37-2.34), on Medicare/Medicaid (vs private, OR = 2.75; 95% CI 1.54-4.92) or had higher Charlson-Deyo score (2 vs 0, OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.03-1.72). Patients were also significantly more likely to refuse surgery if they were seen at a center that is not an academic/research program (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.6-2.27). Patients who were recommended surgery but refused had significantly worse survival than those with stage I who received surgery [median survival 6.8 vs 24 months, Cox hazard ratio (HR) 3.41; 95% CI 3.12-3.60]. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients refusing surgery for operable early-stage pancreatic cancer has been decreasing in the last decade but remains a significant issue that affects survival. Disparities in refusal of surgery are independently associated with several variables including gender, race, and insurance. To mitigate national disparities in surgical care, future studies should focus on exploring potential reasons for refusal and developing communication interventions.

Health-related quality of life after pancreatic resection for malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (QoL) is of major importance in pancreatic cancer, owing to the limited life expectation. The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to describe QoL in patients undergoing resection for pancreatic or periampullary malignancy. METHODS: QoL was measured on a scale of 0-100 in patients who underwent pancreatic resection for malignancy or premalignancy at the University Medical Centre Utrecht before resection, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Measures consisted of the RAND-36, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the EORTC pancreatic cancer-specific module (QLQ-PAN26). RESULTS: Between March 2012 and November 2013, 68 consecutive patients with a malignancy (59 patients) or premalignancy (9) were included. Physical role restriction, social and emotional domains showed a significant and clinically relevant deterioration directly after operation in 53 per cent (RAND-36, P < 0.001), 63 and 78 per cent (QLQ-C30 and RAND-36 respectively, P < 0.001) and 37 per cent (RAND-36, P < 0.001) of patients respectively. Most domains demonstrated recovery to preoperative values or better at 3 months, except for physical functioning. Emotional functioning at 3, 6 and 12 months was better than at baseline (P < 0.001). Symptom scores revealed a deterioration in vitality, pain (P = 0.002), fatigue (P < 0.001), appetite loss (P < 0.001), altered bowel habit (P = 0.001) and side-effects (P < 0.001) after 1 month. After 3 months, only side-effects were worse than preoperative values (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: QoL after pancreatic resection for malignant and premalignant tumours decreased considerably in the early postoperative phase. Full recovery of QoL took up to 6 months after the operation.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) multimodal programme as experienced by pancreatic surgery patients: Findings from an Italian qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: ERAS has recently been implemented in pancreatic surgery settings, but there is little evidence regarding the effects as perceived by patients. Given the lack of the knowledge in the field, the aim of this study was to capture the experience of patients undergoing pancreatic surgery who received perioperative care based on the ERAS programme. METHODS: We designed a qualitative study undertaken in the pancreatic surgery unit of San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy. Twenty-two consecutive patients were invited to participate in the study and 13 patients were interviewed. Data was collected between March and December 2012 either through face-to-face or semi-structured telephone follow-up from three to six weeks after discharge. Data was analysed using the interpretative phenomenological approach. RESULTS: Patients who underwent surgical pancreatic procedures and treated with ERAS programme reported experiences based on four themes: (1) Feeling prepared to face surgery, (2) Being actively "inside" or "outside" the programme, (3) Healing at home: the best setting, and (4) "Perceiving the ordinary as extraordinary": reaching independence, once at home. CONCLUSION: According to the findings, uncomplicated pancreatic surgery patients may benefit from the ERAS programme. Preadmission counselling should help patients to assume an active role. Once the patient returns home, the availability of a caregiver should be thoroughly assessed to guarantee the support needed by patients to successfully complete the ERAS(programme. Surgery and nursing staff should carefully monitor patients and suggest whether they continue, interrupt, or individualise the scheduled ERAS interventions in accordance with a patient's clinical condition and preferred personal timing.

Quality of life in patients after total pancreatectomy is comparable with quality of life in patients who undergo a partial pancreatic resection.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life after total pancreatectomy (TP) is perceived to be poor secondary to insulin-dependent diabetes and pancreatic insufficiency. As a result, surgeons may be reluctant to offer TP for benign and premalignant pancreatic diseases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed presenting features, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes of all patients who underwent TP at our institution. Quality of life was assessed using institutional questionnaires and validated general, pancreatic disease-related, and diabetes-related instruments (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-C30 and module EORTC-PAN26], Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life), and compared with frequency-matched controls, patients after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Continuous variables were compared using Student t-test or analysis of variance. Categorical variables were compared using χ(2) or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2011, 77 TPs were performed. Overall morbidity was 49%, but only 15.8% patients experienced a major complication. Perioperative mortality was 2.6%. Comparing 17 TP and 14 PD patients who returned surveys, there were no statistically significant differences in quality of life in global health, functional status, or symptom domains of EORTC QLQ-C30 or in pancreatic disease-specific EORTC-PAN26. TP patients had slightly but not significantly higher incidence of hypoglycemic events as compared with PD patients with postoperative diabetes. A negative impact of diabetes assessed by Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life did not differ between TP and PD. Life domains most negatively impacted by diabetes involved travel and physical activity, whereas self-confidence, friendships and personal relationships, motivation, and feelings about the future remained unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: Although TP-induced diabetes negatively impacts select activities and functions, overall quality of life is comparable with that of patients who undergo a partial pancreatic resection.

Surgical outcomes after total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to review surgical outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation (TP/IAT) for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: All pediatric patients (≤18 years old) undergoing TP/IAT over a 10-year period (December 2002-June 2012) were identified for inclusion in a single-center, observational cohort study. Retrospective chart review was performed to identify pertinent preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data, including narcotic usage, insulin requirements, etiology of pancreatitis, previous operative interventions, operative times, islet cell yields, duration of hospital stay, and overall quality of life. Quality of life was assessed using the Short Form-36 health questionnaire. RESULTS: Fourteen pediatric patients underwent TP/IAT for the treatment of CP at the University of Cincinnati with a mean age of 15.9 years (range, 14-18) and a mean body mass index of 21.8 kg/m(2) (range, 14-37). Of the patients, 50% (n = 7) were male and 29% had undergone previous pancreatic operations (1 each of Whipple, Puestow, Frey, and Berne procedures). Etiology of pancreatitis was idiopathic for 57% (n = 8); the remainder had identified genetic mutations predisposing to pancreatitis (CFTR, n = 4; SPINK1, n = 1; PRSS1, n = 1). Mean operative time was 532 minutes (range, 360-674) with an average hospital duration of stay of 16 days (range, 7-37). Islet cell isolation resulted in mean islet cell equivalents (IEQ) of 500,443 in patients without previous pancreatic surgery versus 413,671 IEQ in patients with prior pancreatic surgery (P = .12). Median patient follow-up was 9 months from surgery (range, 1-78). Preoperatively, patients required on average 32.7 morphine equivalent mg per day (MEQ), which improved to 13.9 MEQ at most recent follow-up. Eleven patients (79%) were narcotic independent. None of the patients were diabetic preoperatively. All of the patients were discharged after the operation with scheduled insulin requirements (mean, 17 U/d). This requirement decreased to a mean of 10.1 U/d at most recent follow-up visit. Four patients (29%) progressed to insulin independence. All patients in this series achieved stable glycemic control postoperatively and there was no incidence of "brittle" diabetes. Quality-of-life surveys showed improvement in all tested modules. CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the largest series examining TP/IAT in the pediatric population. Pediatric patients benefitted from TP/IAT with a decrease in postoperative narcotic requirements, stable glycemic control, and improved quality of life.

Impact of post-operative complications on quality of life after pancreatectomy.

CONTEXT: Pancreatectomies for malignant and benign diseases are increasingly being performed worldwide. Recent studies, that have evaluated quality of life in pancreatectomy, have reported conflicting outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to analyze the quality of life changes reported by patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis was performed of a clinical trial examining the safety of intraoperative autotransfusion during oncologic resections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative (90-day) complications were graded prospectively using a validated 5-point scale. Quality of life parameters were recorded prospectively by a single trained interviewer preoperatively, at the first post-operative outpatient visit, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-An instruments. RESULTS: Pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma was performed in 34 patients with a median follow-up of 2 years (range: 1-1.5 years). Major (grade≥3) complications occurred in 12 (35.3%) of patients. Early (<6 month) recurrence was noted in 2 patients (5.9%). Increased severity of fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and loss of appetite over baseline were noted at initial follow-up (P<0.05); however, symptom scores normalized at 6-week follow-up, and remained stable at 6 months. No significant difference was noted in quality of life metrics between patients with or without major complications (P>0.11). A significant (P=0.023) decline in cognitive function vs. baseline was noted at 6-month follow-up after pancreatectomy. Using a repeated-measures generalized linear model, neither age, nor complication occurrence, nor adjuvant therapy, nor early recurrence accounted for this cognitive decline (P>0.10). CONCLUSION: Quality of life metrics tend to normalize to preoperative levels after pancreatectomy at 6 weeks post-operatively. The occurrence of major complications does not predict a decreased quality of life. The decrease in self-reported cognitive function at six months in this cohort merits further study.

Symptomatic change and gastrointestinal quality of life after pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatectomy affects gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Our purpose was to assess the quality of life of pancreatectomy patients in relation to GI function. METHODS: Pancreatectomy patients were asked qualitative, open-ended questions about symptoms. They also completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) for reflux syndrome, acute pain syndrome, indigestion syndrome, diarrhoea syndrome and constipation syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients participated. Of these, 69% reported an improvement and 31% reported no change in preoperative symptoms. No patients reported a worsening of symptoms. Half (50%) of the patients experienced new, different symptoms. Median GSRS scores were 0 for reflux syndrome [interquartile range (IQR): 0-1.0], 0 for acute pain syndrome (IQR: 0-1.0), 2.0 for indigestion syndrome (IQR: 1.0-4.0), 2.0 for diarrhoea syndrome (IQR: 0.5-4.5), and 0 for constipation syndrome (IQR: 0-1.0). Whipple operation patients scored higher on the reflux syndrome (0.5 vs. 0; P= 0.08) and indigestion syndrome (3.5 vs. 1.5; P= 0.06) domains. A total of 68% of Whipple operation patients experienced new symptoms, compared with 32% of patients who had undergone other types of pancreatectomy (P= 0.002). Scores of patients who had undergone surgery <2 years and >2 years earlier, respectively, did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent pancreatectomy frequently experienced an improvement in preoperative symptoms, but also experienced new postoperative symptoms. This was more common after Whipple operations. However, these symptoms were relatively mild in severity. These mild symptoms seem to persist over time.

Outcomes and quality of life after partial pancreatectomy for noninsulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia from diffuse islet cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Noninsulinoma pancreatogenous hypoglycemia (NIPH) is a rare cause of hypoglycemia, especially affecting postbariatric surgery patients, related to excessive insulin secretion. Partial pancreatectomy controls hypoglycemia in the early postoperative period; however, multiple patients have experienced symptomatic relapse. The study goal was to assess frequency and severity of recurrent symptoms in operated patients. METHODS: All patients who underwent pancreatic resection for NIPH at Mayo Clinic from January 1996 through December 2008 were reviewed for demographics, preoperative testing, operative and postoperative details. Data from patient records, mail survey, European Quality of Life Survey (EQ-5D), and Fear of Hypoglycemia Scale (FOHS) were used to assess outcome. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients underwent pancreatic resection for NIPH (5 dead, 1 incarcerated). 48 patients (70%) completed the survey; mean follow-up, 53 months. Median time to recurrent symptoms was 16 months in 41 patients (87%). Despite symptom recurrence, 36 patients (75%) reported overall improvement in symptoms and quality of life (QOL); median EQ-5D health scores increased from 40 to 75 out of 100 (P < .001). Moreover, they reported marked reduction in psychologic stress and hypoglycemic symptoms with greater than 50% decrease in FOHS overall, worry, and behavioral median scores (P < .001). Overall, half of the patients were classified as highly/moderately surgically successful, whereas the other half was minimally successful or surgical failures. CONCLUSION: Although nearly 90% of NIPH patients reported recurrent symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia, a majority reported improvements in QOL and marked reduction in other symptoms after pancreatic resection. Nevertheless, 25% of patients experienced no benefit from partial pancreatectomy.

[The difficult patient--a medical viewpoint]. / Der schwierige Patient aus Sicht des Mediziners.

The management of patients suffering from chronic incurable organic disease combined with a strong element of psychiatric disorder requires patience. Sometimes the involved physicians reach their limits and are pushed to the brink of resignation.

Postobstructive chronic pancreatitis: results with distal resection.

HYPOTHESIS: For most patients with chronic obstructive pancreatitis, distal pancreatectomy confers pain relief. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. Follow-up was complete in 80% of study subjects (mean follow-up, 6.7 years). SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Among 484 patients with chronic pancreatitis undergoing operation from 1976 to 1997, 40 with postobstructive chronic pancreatitis were identified. Criteria for selection included an isolated, dominant major pancreatic duct stricture or cutoff, changes of chronic pancreatitis in the distal pancreas, and ostensibly normal parenchyma without calcification in the proximal gland. The patients were reviewed with regard to operative procedure, postoperative course, and outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included degree of pain relief, morbidity and mortality of operation, survival, rates of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency, and ability to return to work and/or normal activities. RESULTS: All but 1 of the 40 patients had abdominal pain, and 20 (50%) had recurrent episodes of acute pancreatitis. Suspicion of malignancy was a concern in 16 patients (40%). Thirty-eight patients underwent distal pancreatectomy; 1 had a central resection and another a Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy. There was no operative mortality, but significant morbidity occurred in 15%. Among 31 patients with preoperative pain in whom long-term follow-up was available, complete or significant pain relief was achieved in 25 (81%); 74% returned to normal social function, but about half had some element of pancreatic insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Distal pancreatectomy is a safe procedure and achieves pain relief and good quality of life in a large percentage of patients (80%) with presumed postobstructive chronic pancreatitis. However, some of these patients with chronic pancreatitis involving the entire gland have disease masquerading as postobstructive chronic pancreatitis secondary to an ostensibly isolated dominant pancreatic ductal stricture.

Coping and adaptation in pancreatectomized patients: a somatopsychic perspective.

The present study describes various strategies of coping with illness as observed in pancreatectomy patients, a group of patients which has not been investigated before in this field of research. Questionnaire data obtained from a sample of n = 134 were analyzed with regard to sociodemographic (age, sex) and medical characteristics (indication for surgery: chronic pancreatitis vs. pancreatic carcinoma; outcome after surgery: diabetes, hypoglycemia, pain). The relationships between ways of coping and several adaptation criteria were investigated. The question is put up to discussion, if it is possible to clearly separate emotion as a way of coping and emotion as an outcome of coping.

[Coping with disease from the psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic viewpoint exemplified by pancreatectomized patients]. / Krankheitsverarbeitung aus psychosomatisch-psychotherapeutischer Sicht am Beispiel pankreatektomierter Patienten.

In the past few years psychosomatic medicine, apart from investigating the psychosocial sources of bodily disorders, has begun to focus also on the opposite side of the problem, the question of how people experience illness and cope with it. This "somatopsychic" view can be regarded as a supplement to the so far prevailing psychosomatic perspective and its approach. The present study describes and analyzes various strategies of coping with illness as observed in a group of pancreatectomized patients, a group of patients which has not been investigated before in this field of research. Based upon the experience of long-term psychotherapeutic care, the study differentiates between the more problematic and the more beneficial forms of coping, and empirically verifies their prevalence and adaptivity in a sample of pancreatectomized patients, not selected with regard to the extent of care needed. The findings are discussed from the methodological and the psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic point of view.

[Quality of life after duodenopancreatectomy in patients with carcinoma of Vater's ampulla (author's transl)]. / Zur Lebensqualität nach partieller Duodenopankreatektomie bei Karzinom der Papilla Vateri.

Partial duodenopancreatectomy, which leads to poor long-term results in the treatment of cancer of the head of the pancreas, achieves 5 years survival rates of 30% in cancer of Vater's ampulla. A report is given on 3 patients, who could be cured of a cancer of Vater's ampulla by this procedure for more than 10 or 15 years respectively. The quality of life of these patients is satisfactory. As a late consequence diabetes mellitus occurred in 2 patients.