Characterization of intestinal microbiota in alcoholic patients with and without alcoholic hepatitis or chronic alcoholic pancreatitis.

Excessive alcohol consumption leads to severe alcoholic hepatitis (sAH) or chronic alcoholic pancreatitis (CAP) only in a subset of patients. We aimed to characterize the intestinal microbiota profiles of alcoholic patients according to the presence and nature of the complications observed: sAH or CAP. Eighty two alcoholic patients were included according to their complications: CAP (N = 24), sAH (N = 13) or no complications (alcoholic controls, AC, N = 45). We analyzed the intestinal microbiota by high-throughput sequencing. Bacterial diversity was lower in patients with CAP, who had a global intestinal microbiota composition different from that of AC. The intestinal microbiota composition of these two groups differed for 17 genera, eight of which were more frequent in patients with CAP (e.g. Klebsiella, Enterococcus and Sphingomonas). There was no significant difference in bacterial diversity between the sAH and CAP groups. However, 16 taxa were more frequent in sAH patients, and 10 were more frequent in CAP patients. After adjustment for confounding factors sAH patients were found to have higher levels of Haemophilus. For alcoholic patients, specific intestinal microbiota signatures are associated with different complications. Patients with CAP and sAH also display specific dysbiosis relative to AC.

Modified single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage technique for a huge infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: A case report.

We report a successful endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of a huge infected multilocular walled-off necrosis (WON) that was treated by a modified single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainage (SGTMD) technique. After placing a wide-caliber fully covered metal stent, follow-up computed tomography revealed an undrained subcavity of WON. A large fistula that was created by the wide-caliber metal stent enabled the insertion of a forward-viewing upper endoscope directly into the main cavity, and the narrow connection route within the main cavity to the subcavity was identified with a direct view, leading to the successful drainage of the subcavity. This modified SGTMD technique appears to be useful for seeking connection routes between subcavities of WON in some cases.

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is common both among patients with alcoholic and idiopathic chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is known to occur in patients with chronic pancreatitis, particularly of alcoholic etiology. There are, however, scanty data on frequency of SIBO in patients with chronic idiopathic pancreatitis and factors associated with its occurrence. METHODS: 68 patients with chronic pancreatitis and 74 age and gender-matched healthy subjects (HS) were evaluated for SIBO using glucose hydrogen breath test (GHBT). Persistent rise in breath hydrogen 12 ppm above basal (at least two recordings) was diagnostic of SIBO. RESULT: SIBO was diagnosed more often among patients with chronic pancreatitis than controls (10/68 [14.7%] vs. 1/74 controls [1.3%]; p = 0.003). Of 68 patients, 22 (32.3%) had alcoholic and 46 (67.6%) had idiopathic chronic pancreatitis. SIBO was as commonly detected among patients with alcoholic as idiopathic pancreatitis (3/22 [13.6%] vs. 7/46 [15.2%]; p = 0.86). Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), steatorrhoea, pain, analgesic use, pancreatic calcifications and use of pancreatic enzyme supplements had no relationship with the presence of SIBO. Diabetes mellitus tended to be commoner among patients with chronic pancreatitis with than without SIBO (6/10 [60%] vs. 18/58 [31%]; p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: SIBO was commoner among patients with chronic pancreatitis, both alcoholic and idiopathic, than HS. Though presence of SIBO among patients with chronic pancreatitis tended to be commoner among those with diabetes mellitus, there was no relationship with age, gender, BMI, steatorrhoea, pain, analgesic use, pancreatic calcifications and use of pancreatic enzyme supplements.

Alcoholic severe acute pancreatitis with positive culture of pancreatic juice treated by nasopancreatic drainage.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a serious disease associated with alcoholism and has a high mortality rate. Effective treatments have not been established. METHODS: A 58-year-old man was admitted due to alcoholic SAP. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography revealed pancreatic calculi at the pancreas head and a stricture in the pancreatic duct from the pancreas head to the body. Endoscopically, nasopancreatic drainage (NPD) was placed through the minor papilla to the pancreas tail beyond the stricture. RESULTS: Pancreatic juice culture was positive for Streptococcus and Enterobacter. The day after NPD, upper abdominal pain was relieved. After changing NPD to a pancreatic stent, the patient was discharged on day 21 post-NPD. CONCLUSION: Alcoholic SAP may reflect aggravation of chronic pancreatitis. The possibility of acute bacterial inflammation should be considered in all cases of chronic alcoholic pancreatitis who present with severe features of inflammation, even in the early stages of an attack. Treatment of this subset of cases by drainage could be of great importance and NPD may be the preferred method.

Microbiologic analysis of peri-pancreatic fluid collected during EUS in patients with pancreatitis: impact on antibiotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is a potentially life-threatening condition frequently accompanied by peri-pancreatic fluid collections (PPFC), such as pseudocysts or pancreatic necrosis. Aspiration of PPFCs during EUS interventions for microbiologic analysis is still rarely performed in clinical routine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of routine microbiologic analysis of PPFCs and its impact on antibiotic therapy in patients with pancreatitis. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, multicenter study. SETTING: Four treatment centers. PATIENTS: A total of 44 consecutive patients who presented for endoscopic treatment of PPFCs were included. INTERVENTION: Concomitantly, PPFC during intervention and concomitant blood cultures were obtained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Microbiologic examination of PPFCs and blood samples. RESULTS: Colonization of PPFCs was found in 59% of PPFC cultures, whereas all but 2 concomitant blood cultures showed no microbial growth. Risk factors for a colonization were the presence of necrosis (P = .006), acute pancreatitis (P = .033), leukocytosis (P = .001), elevated C-reactive protein levels (P = .003), fever (P = .02), turbid material (P = .031), and longer hospital stay (P = .003). In 23 patients with fluid colonization despite empiric antibiotic therapy, the treatment had to be adjusted in 18 patients (78%) according to the observed antibiotic susceptibility profile. LIMITATIONS: Contamination cannot be totally excluded. CONCLUSION: The microbiologic colonization of PPFCs in patients with pancreatitis is common. Only the direct microbiologic analysis of PPFCs, but not of blood cultures, is useful to optimize an effective antibiotic therapy in patients with pancreatitis.

Helicobacter pylori in alcohol induced acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The objective of this study was to measure the association of Helicobacter pylori infection with alcoholic acute pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study comprised of 50 patients with their first alcoholic pancreatitis and 50 alcoholic controls with no history of pancreatitis but similar alcohol use recruited from an alcohol rehabilitation center. Helicobacter infection was measured using Enzygnost EIA IgG-test. Complications and length of hospital stay were also recorded in patients with alcoholic pancreatitis. RESULTS: The seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori was 10/50 (20%) in the pancreatitis group and 15/50 (30%) in the control group (p = NS). The median length of hospital stay of pancreatitis patients was 7 days, 11 days for those tested positive (range 6-25) and 6 days for those tested negative (range 3-47) for Helicobacter pylori, p = 0.013. As determined with the Atlanta criteria, seropositive patients tended to have more often severe pancreatitis, 4/10 (40%) vs. 6/40 (15%), OR 3.78 (95% CI 0.815-17.52), p = 0.097. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that Helicobacter pylori infection is not associated clinically significantly with the development of alcoholic pancreatitis. However, Helicobacter pylori infection may be associated with longer hospital stay due to more severe disease, which needs to be studied in a larger series of patients.

Difference in microbes contaminating pancreatic necrosis in biliary and alcoholic pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION: There are differences in the microbiology of infected pancreatic necrosis in alcoholic and biliary pancreatitis. One possible explanation may be different routes of contamination. BACKGROUND: Infection is a severe complication in acute pancreatitis. Bacteria are found in 40-70% of all patients suffering from necrotizing pancreatitis. We investigated whether there were any differences in microbes isolated from pancreatic necrosis in biliary and alcoholic pancreatitis. METHODS: Microbiological tests were conducted on necrosis taken at the operation for pancreatitis with the etiology of (group A) alcoholic pancreatitis (n = 47) and (group B) biliary pancreatitis (n = 23). Patients with simultaneous cholecystitis were excluded. The time from the first symptoms to the operation or the extent of necrosis did not differ between the groups. RESULTS: Microbes were isolated more often in the cultures from group B than group A (17/23 = 74% vs 15/47 = 32%, p = 0.001). The most common were Gram-positive bacteria in group A and Gram-negative bacteria in group B. From the first week, from the onset of symptoms to the operation. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated significantly more often in the cultures from group B patients than from group A patients (8/10 = 80% vs 1/5 = 20%, p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, we found that biliary pancreatitis was an independent risk factor (adds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-52.10) of contamination of necrosis with Gram-negative bacteria.

Prophylactic antibiotics in treatment of severe acute alcoholic pancreatitis.

Infectious complications currently account for 80% of deaths from acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity for prophylactic antibiotics in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Twenty-three consecutive patients suffering from acute alcoholic pancreatitis with computed tomography demonstrating two or more fluid collections were randomly assigned to one of two groups receiving either nonantibiotic treatment or prophylactic antibiotics (ceftazidime, amikacine, and metronidazole for 10 days). Sepsis was always diagnosed by positive cultures. Seven episodes of severe sepsis occurred (pancreatic infection and septic shock) in the nonantibiotic group, and no infection occurred in the prophylactic antibiotic group (p < 0.03). In conclusion, the use of prophylactic antibiotics in severe alcoholic acute pancreatitis significantly reduces the incidence of severe infection.