The Utility of Perilipin in Liposarcomas: PLIN1 Differentiates Round Cell Liposarcoma From Other Round Cell Sarcomas.

Liposarcoma is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in adults; however, accurate diagnosis often depends on the use of ancillary molecular testing which can be time consuming and expensive. Myxoid/round cell liposarcoma may be a diagnostic challenge due to the morphologic similarities with other nonadipocytic sarcomas with round cell morphology. Immunohistochemistry may be a helpful adjunct to appropriately triage cases for molecular testing. Perilipin 1 (PLIN1) and perilipin 2 (adipophilin) (PLIN2) are intracellular proteins involved in lipid droplet formation, which we hypothesized may be useful as immunohistochemical markers for liposarcoma. Using archival tumor tissue, we assessed pattern of PLIN1 and PLIN2 expression in 46 adipocytic tumors and 36 nonadipocytic sarcomas. PLIN1 was expressed in 88% of liposarcomas, including 100% of myxoid/round cell liposarcomas, and did not have any expression in nonadipocytic sarcomas. PLIN1 was not expressed in dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Although PLIN2 demonstrates increased sensitivity for liposarcoma, including expression in dedifferentiated liposarcoma, it is not specific for adipocytic differentiation and is expressed in other nonadipocytic sarcomas. Furthermore, PLIN2 is not expressed in lipoma-like well-differentiated liposarcoma, and as such has limited diagnostic utility.

Perilipin 1 Expression Differentiates Liposarcoma from Other Types of Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Lipid droplets, a morphologic feature of adipocytic tumors, are strongly regulated by associated proteins of the perilipin/PAT (perilipin, adipophilin, and tail-interacting protein of 47 kD) family. So far, the use of perilipins as markers for differential diagnosis of soft tissue tumors has only been studied in a few cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of perilipins in 478 human soft tissue tumors and 60 respective normal tissues. Perilipin 1 was immunohistochemically positive in all studied cases of well-differentiated liposarcomas, >90% of myxoid round cell liposarcomas, and >70% of pleomorphic liposarcomas, whereas only the differentiated components of dedifferentiated liposarcomas were immunohistochemically positive for perilipin 1. All other types of soft tissue sarcomas were negative for perilipin 1. Perilipin 2 was more prominent in dedifferentiated and pleomorphic liposarcomas and nearly all other high-grade sarcomas. In well-differentiated liposarcomas, lipomas, or normal adipose tissue, perilipin 2 was virtually absent. In addition, long-term stimulation of adipogenesis in the liposarcoma cell line LiSa-2 restored perilipin 1 expression, as exhibited in the source tumor. Furthermore, knockdown of perilipin 2 or perilipin 3 in LiSa-2 cells influenced lipid droplet number and size as well as cell vitality. In summary, perilipin 1 is a promising marker for the differential diagnosis of liposarcomas from other soft tissue sarcomas, whereas perilipin 2 correlates negatively with tumor grade and may be therapeutically useful.

Chlorogenic Acid Functions as a Novel Agonist of PPARγ2 during the Differentiation of Mouse 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes.

Rosiglitazone (RG) is a well-known activator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) and used to treat hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes; however, its clinical application has been confounded by adverse side effects. Here, we assessed the roles of chlorogenic acid (CGA), a phenolic secondary metabolite found in many fruits and vegetables, on the differentiation and lipolysis of mouse 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. The results showed that CGA promoted differentiation in vitro according to oil red O staining and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays. As a potential molecular mechanism, CGA downregulated mRNA levels of the adipocyte differentiation-inhibitor gene Pref1 and upregulated those of major adipogenic transcriptional factors (Cebpb and Srebp1). Additionally, CGA upregulated the expression of the differentiation-related transcriptional factor PPARγ2 at both the mRNA and protein levels. However, following CGA intervention, the accumulation of intracellular triacylglycerides following preadipocyte differentiation was significantly lower than that in the RG group. Consistent with this, our data indicated that CGA treatment significantly upregulated the expression of lipogenic pathway-related genes Plin and Srebp1 during the differentiation stage, although the influence of CGA was weaker than that of RG. Notably, CGA upregulated the expression of the lipolysis-related gene Hsl, whereas it did not increase the expression of the lipid synthesis-related gene Dgat1. These results demonstrated that CGA might function as a potential PPARγ agonist similar to RG; however, the impact of CGA on lipolysis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes differed from that of RG.

Adipogenic Impairment of Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Subjects With Metabolic Syndrome: Possible Protective Role of FGF2.

Context: The decreased expansion capacity of adipose tissue plays a crucial role in the onset of disorders associated with metabolic syndrome. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the state of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) from obese subjects with different metabolic profiles. Design: This was a 2-year study to enroll subjects who underwent bariatric surgery or cholecystectomy. Setting: University Hospital. Patients and Intervention: Patients who underwent either bariatric surgery (20 morbidly obese) or cholecystectomy (40 subjects) participated in the study. Main Outcome Measures: ASCs were obtained from both visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Adipogenic, fibrotic gene expression was quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Smad7 and fibroblast growth factor 2 were quantified by western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. The susceptibility of ASCs to apoptosis, their population doubling time, and their clonogenic potential were evaluated. Results: The worsening metabolic profile of the patients was accompanied by a decrease in the intrinsic levels of adipogenic gene expression, reduced proliferation rate, clonogenic potential, and exportation of fibroblast growth factor 2 to the cell surface of the ASCs derived from both tissues. In addition, the ASCs from patients without metabolic syndrome showed differences in susceptibility to apoptosis and expression of TGFß-signaling inhibitory protein Smad7 with respect to the ASCs from patients with metabolic syndrome. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the decrease in adipogenic-gene mRNA and clonogenic potential, as well as the accumulation of fibrotic proteins with metabolic alterations, could be a relevant mechanism controlling the number and size of neogenerated adipocytes and involved in alteration of adipose-tissue expansion.