Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study.

Background and purpose - Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a treatment method for unstable ankle fractures. During recent years, scientific evidence has shed light on surgical indications as well as on hardware removal. We assessed the incidence and trends of hardware removal procedures following ORIF of ankle fractures.Patients and methods - The study covered all patients 18 years of age and older who had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland between the years 1997 and 2016. Patient data were obtained from the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register.Results - 68,865 patients had an ankle fracture treated with ORIF in Finland during the 20-year study period between 1997 and 2016. A hardware removal procedure was performed on 27% of patients (n = 18,648). The incidence of hardware removal procedures after ankle fracture decreased from 31 (95% CI 29-32) per 100,000 person-years in the highest year 2001 (n = 1,247) to 13 (CI 12-14) per 100,000 person-years in 2016 (n = 593). Moreover, the proportion and number of removal operations performed within the first 3 months also decreased. The costs of removal procedures decreased from approximately €994,000 in 2001 to €472,600 in 2016.Interpretation - Removal of hardware after ankle surgery (ORIF) is a common operation with substantial costs. However, the incidence and cost of removals decreased during the study period, with a particular decrease in hardware removal operations within 3 months.

Implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma: a UK experience.

INTRODUCTION: Implant wastage is an under-reported issue in orthopaedics, yet it has been shown to have a significant cost burden on healthcare budgets. In a background of a perilous financial climate in the UK health service, our aim was to define the frequency and costs of implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trauma theatre's implant logbook was retrospectively analysed between April 2017 and April 2018. Wasted implants were identified by the study authors independently. Patient demographics, implant details and costs were among the data collected. Product codes of wasted implants were used to identify implant costs through the manufacturer. RESULTS: Implant wastage occurred in 25.1% of trauma procedures during the study period. Most wasted implants (91%) were screws. The total cost of implant wastage was £8,377.25 during the 12-month period, accounting for 2% of the total implant budget. Wasted intramedullary nails accounted for almost 50% of the total cost. More than 51% of affected procedures involved a trainee as the primary operator. DISCUSSION: We report the first study of implant wastage in orthopaedics from the UK. Total implant wastage was higher than reported in most of the published literature, although it represented a small portion of the budget. Implant wastage is attributable to surgeons or operating theatre staff in most cases and is compounded by surgeons' limited understanding of implant costs. Initiatives to reduce implant wastage should include raising awareness of costs and departmental wastage to surgeons and operating theatre staff as well as employing preoperative planning techniques.

Does an Implant Usage Report Card Impact Orthopaedic Trauma Implant Stewardship?

OBJECTIVES: As hospitals seek to control variable expenses, orthopaedic surgeons have come under scrutiny because of relatively high implant costs. We aimed to determine whether feedback to surgeons regarding implant costs results in changes in implant selection. METHODS: This study was undertaken at a statewide trauma referral center and included 6 fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. A previously implemented implant stewardship program at our institution using a "red-yellow-green" (RYG) implant selection tool classifies 7 commonly used trauma implant constructs based on cost and categorizes each implant as red (used for patient-specific requirements, most expensive), yellow (midrange), and green (preferred vendor, least expensive). The constructs included were femoral intramedullary nail, tibial intramedullary nail, long and short cephalomedullary nails, distal femoral plate, proximal tibial plate, and lower-limb external fixator. Baseline implant usage from the previous year was obtained and provided to each surgeon. Each surgeon received a monthly feedback report containing individual implant utilization and overall ranking. RESULTS: The overall RYG score increased from 68.7 to 79.1 of 100 (P < 0.001). Three of the 7 implants (tibial and femoral nails and lower-limb external fixation) had significant increases in their RYG scores; implant selections for the other 4 implants were not significantly altered. A decrease of 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.4-3.2, P = 0.01) was noted in overall implant costs over the study period. CONCLUSION: Our intervention resulted in changes in surgeons' implant selections and cost savings. However, surgeons were unwilling to change certain implants despite their being more expensive.

Does Implant Choice Affect the Episode Cost of Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture for US Veterans?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate an association between a surgeon's choice of a cephalomedullary nail (CMN) or sliding hip screw (SHS) with the cost of treating a pertrochanteric hip fracture. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: US Veterans Health Administration Sierra Pacific Network. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety-four consecutive US veterans admitted for a principal diagnosis of an OTA/AO 31A-type pertrochanteric hip fracture of a native hip from 2000 to 2015. INTERVENTION: Internal fixation using a CMN or an SHS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Veterans Administration Health Economic Resource Center average national cost estimate of combined acute and postacute care episode cost, excluding implant cost, normalized to 2015 US dollars by the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: Median episode cost was $8223 lower with a CMN than an SHS (95% confidence interval, $5700-$10,746, P < 0.001) after matching on a propensity score for treatment with a CMN based on age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, fracture characteristics, study site, and admission year. A subgroup propensity-matched analysis excluding reverse obliquity pertrochanteric fractures was not sufficiently powered to detect a difference in episode cost (ß = 0.76, P = 0.311). CONCLUSIONS: Implant choice significantly affected the episode cost of care of hip fracture at Veterans Health Administration facilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cost Comparison of Femoral Distraction Osteogenesis With External Lengthening Over a Nail Versus Internal Magnetic Lengthening Nail.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral lengthening is performed by distraction osteogenesis via lengthening over a nail (LON) or by using a magnetic lengthening nail (MLN). MLN avoids the complications of external fixation while providing accurate and easily controlled lengthening. However, the increased cost of implants has led many to question whether MLN is cost-effective compared with LON. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed comparing consecutive femoral lengthenings using either LON (n = 19) or MLN (n = 39). The number of surgical procedures, time to union, and amount of lengthening were compared. Cost analysis was performed using both hospital and surgeon payments. Costs were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the length of femoral distraction. Patients treated with MLN underwent fewer surgeries (3.1 versus 2.1; P < 0.001) and had a shorter time to union (136.7 versus 100.2 days; P = 0.001). Total costs were similar ($50,255 versus $44,449; P = 0.482), although surgeon fees were lower for MLN ($4,324 versus $2,769; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Although implants are more expensive for MLN than LON, this appears to be offset by fewer procedures. Overall, the two procedures had similar total costs, but MLN was associated with a decreased number of procedures and shorter time to union. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Implant options for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: rationale, evidence, and recommendations.

AIMS: The aim of this paper is to review the evidence relating to the anatomy of the proximal femur, the geometry of the fracture and the characteristics of implants and methods of fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant papers were identified from appropriate clinical databases and a narrative review was undertaken. RESULTS: Stable, unstable, and subtrochanteric intertrochanteric fractures vary widely in their anatomical and biomechanical characteristics, as do the implants used for their fixation. The optimal choice of implant addresses the stability of the fracture and affects the outcome. CONCLUSION: The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip has evolved along with changes in the design of the implants used to fix them, but there remains conflicting evidence to guide the choice of implant. We advocate fixation of 31A1 fractures with a sliding hip screw and all others with an intramedullary device. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:128-33.

Intramedullary Nailing System in Unstable Both Bone Diaphyseal Fractures in Children.

Background Forearm fractures in pediatric population is usually managed conservatively. Unstable fractures need operative intervention like closed or open intramedullary nailing or open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws. However, there is no consensus regarding the method of treatment according to age group. Objective To standardize the use of elastic nailing system as effective form of treatment in terms of function, cost and lower complications as compared to widely used titanium nails in developed countries.Method Sixty eight pediatric patients with both bone forearm diaphyseal fractures were managed with closed reduction and intramedullary fixation with rush nail or k-wire and followed at least for 6 months for evaluation of radiological and functional outcome. Result Patients were divided into two age groups, Group A for age of 5 to 9 years (26 patients) and Group B for age of 10-15 years (42 patients). The mean time for union for Group A patient was 7.31 weeks which was significantly lower than that of Group B patients of 9.33 weeks (p-value < 0.05). All the patients in Group A had excellent outcome and 36 (85.7%) patients had excellent outcome and 6 (14.3%) had good outcome in Group B. 5 out of 68 cases (7.35 %) had minor complications (2 in Group A and 3 in Group B). The mean time for implant removal was 17.9 weeks in Group A and 22.9 in Group B. Conclusion Intramedullary fixation for unstable diaphyseal both bone fractures of forearm is safe and cost effective method of treatment with good to excellent functional outcome with union time being significantly lower in younger age group.

Does Knowledge of Implant Cost Affect Fixation Method Choice in the Management of Stable Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?

We conducted a study to determine if knowledge of implant cost affects fixation method choice in the management of stable intertrochanteric hip fractures. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 119 patients treated with a sliding hip screw (SHS; Versafix), a short Gamma nail (SGN), or a long Gamma nail (LGN). Of the 119 fractures, 71 were treated before implant costs were revealed, and 48 afterward. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, fracture types, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and preinjury ambulatory status. SHS was used in 38.0% of the before cases and 27.1% of the after cases, SGN in 29.6% of the before cases and 45.8% of the after cases, and LGN in 32.4% of the before cases and 27.1% of the after cases. Changes in implant use were not statistically significant. SHS was favored for 31-A1.1, 31-A1.2, and 31-A2.1 fractures in the before group but only for 31-A1.2 fractures in the after group. Gamma nails of both sizes were preferred in the after group for 31-A1.1, 31-A1.3, and 31-A2.1 fractures. At our institution, surgeon knowledge of implant cost did not affect fixation method choice in the management of stable intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Costs and Complications of Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of OTA 31-A2 Proximal Femur Fractures in U.S. Veterans.

OBJECTIVES: In fractures without subtrochanteric extension, the indications for the use of short versus long cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) for intertrochanteric femur fractures are unclear. We hypothesized that long nails would be associated with higher costs and similar complication rates. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. SETTING: United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving CMNs for OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures from 2001 to 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Short versus long cephalomedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Costs, perioperative complications, readmissions, surgical failures, and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 262 patients with OTA 31-A2 pertrochanteric fractures (125 treated with short CMNs and 137 treated with long CMNs). The 2 cohorts had similar demographic and medical characteristics. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications, readmissions within 30 days, surgical failures within one year, or death within 30 days or one year. The average cost of hospitalization was significantly higher for the cohort treated with long nails (greater than $7000 in actual costs, and greater than $3000 when statistically adjusted for differences in postoperative lengths of stay). Multivariable analyses showed no significant differences in the rates of development of at least one complication, readmission, or death. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with similar characteristics and fracture patterns, the use of long CMNs was associated with similar rates of complications, readmission, and reoperations, but significantly higher costs than with the use of short nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Short Versus Long Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: Incidence of Ipsilateral Fractures and Costs Associated With Each Implant.

OBJECTIVES: Both short intramedullary nails (SIMNs) and long intramedullary nails (LIMNs) are routinely used in the surgical treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of ipsilateral femur fractures after the surgical treatment of hip fractures and the overall costs associated with each implant. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center and 2 community hospitals. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 609 patients with pertrochanteric hip fractures treated with an SIMN or LIMN from 2005 to 2011. INTERVENTION: Review of patient demographics and clinical outcomes over a 5-year follow-up period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Ipsilateral femur refracture rates were recorded for both groups, and a cost analysis was then performed to compare SIMNs and LIMNs while accounting for their observed refracture rates and surgical/hospital costs to determine the overall cost of each implant. RESULTS: Union rates were equivalent between groups and averaged over 97%. The incidence of ipsilateral femur fractures in both groups steadily increased with greater follow-up time to reach nearly 10% at 5 years. Although only 47% of all nails were locked distally, 15 of the 16 refractures occurred in nails that were not distally locked. Cost analysis revealed no significant difference in the use of short versus LIMNs over a 5-year period (P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ipsilateral femur refractures steadily rose with greater follow-up in both SIMN and LIMNs. Distally locking the initial fixation seems to protect against future femur fractures and may also affect the refracture location when using LIMNs. No differences in overall costs were seen at 1, 2, or 5 years between SIMNs and LIMNs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The SIGN Nail: Factors in a Successful Device for Low-Resource Settings.

Surgeons in low-resource settings manage an increasing number of patients presenting with high-energy fractures. The number of surgeons and the operating time available are frequently not adequate to treat these fractures in a timely manner. A common cause of delay in treating fractures is waiting for the patient to accumulate sufficient funding to pay for the surgery, including the surgical implant. The donation of the SIGN intramedullary nail interlocking screw system obviates a major delay in timing of surgery. The SIGN intramedullary nail has been designed to be used in low-resource settings as it can be placed without fluoroscopy or electricity. The SIGN-trained surgeons are very skillful in hand reaming the canal, placing the nail, and interlocking screws without fluoroscopy. As more is learned about fracture healing, the SIGN system continues to evolve. The SIGN system is expanding to include deformity correction and soft tissue coverage.

Local production of skeletal traction pins to improve access to skeletal traction.

Femoral fractures represent a substantial orthopaedic injury. In the developed world, closed reduction and locked intramedullary nailing is recognized as the optimal treatment. In the less developed world, the use of skeletal traction remains limited by cost and availability of traction pins, which are obtained from orthopaedic companies in the UK or Indian subcontinent. This study aimed to establish whether traction pins may be manufactured locally in resource-limited countries from cut down stainless steel rods. The overall costs for traction pins were obtained from five UK, Indian subcontinent-based companies and metal fabrication shops in Africa. Strict design specifications were provided. The mean price for 100 Steinmann pins was$428 in the Indian subcontinent,$96 in Malawi,$105 in Kenya and$244 in Tanzania. Our results indicate that Steinmann pins may be manufactured locally in resource-limited countries at a significantly cheaper price, which may increase the access to skeletal traction.

An observational cohort study of the adoption of elastic stable intramedullary nailing for the treatment of pediatric femur fractures in Kumasi, Ghana.

BACKGROUND: In high- and middle-income countries, elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the commonest treatment of femur fractures in children 5-11 years of age. At Komfo Anokye Teaching hospital (KATH) in Kumasi, Ghana, prior to this study all pediatric femur fractures were treated with skin traction to union. This study was designed to report the early results and costs of the adoption of ESIN at KATH to provide data to other low- and middle-income sites considering adoption of this surgical technique. METHODS: An observational cohort study that included 84 pediatric patients ages 3-14 years presenting with closed femur fractures and treated with either skin traction or ESIN. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the rate of treatment success between treatment groups. RESULTS: Treatment success (coronal and sagittal angulation less than 10 ° and shortening less than 15 mm at osseous union) was achieved in 92 % of the ESIN group versus 67 % of the skin traction group (odds ratio for ESIN group 9.28 (1.6-54.7); p = 0.0138). Average length of stay was significantly lower in the ESIN group (p = 0.001), but charges to patients were higher in the ESIN group (p < 0.001) because of the high cost of implants. CONCLUSIONS: The initial experience of operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children using ESIN was positive, with improved rates of treatment success and no surgical complications. Because of the high cost of implants, direct costs of treatment remained higher with ESIN despite reductions in length of hospital stay.

Analysis of strategies to increase external fixator stiffness: is double stacking worth the cost?

We compared the mechanical benefits and costs of 3 strategies that are commonly used to increase knee-spanning external fixator stiffness (resistance to deformation): double stacking, cross-linking, and use of an oblique pin. At our academic trauma centre and biomechanical testing laboratory, we used ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene bone models and commercially available external fixator components to simulate knee-spanning external fixation. The models were tested in anterior-posterior bending, medial-lateral bending, axial compression, and torsion. We recorded the construct stiffness for each strategy in all loading modes and assessed a secondary outcome of cost per 10% increase in stiffness. Double stacking significantly increased construct stiffness under anterior-posterior bending (109%), medial-lateral bending (22%), axial compression (150%), and torsion (41%) (p<0.05). Use of an oblique pin significantly increased stiffness under torsion (25%) (p<0.006). Cross-linking significantly increased stiffness only under torsion (29%) (p<0.002). Double stacking increased costs by 84%, cross-linking by 28%, and use of an oblique pin by 15% relative to a standard fixator. All 3 strategies increased stiffness under torsion to varying degrees, but only double stacking increased stiffness in all 4 testing modalities (p<0.05). Double stacking is most effective in increasing resistance to bending, particularly under anterior-posterior bending and axial compression, but requires a relatively high cost increase. Clinicians can use these data to help guide the most cost-effective strategy to increase construct stiffness based on the plane in which stiffness is needed.

Is there a role for Ender's nailing of paediatric femoral fractures in a resource-restricted hospital set-up?

Paediatric femur fractures are managed with the titanium elastic nail system (TENS) in the 5-16-year age group. TENS is costly and not easily available in public hospitals. This study compares TENS nailing with stainless-steel Ender's nail fixation of paediatric femur fractures. A retrospective analysis of patient records from 2006 to 2008 yielded 31 children, 5-16 years of age, who underwent flexible nailing for isolated femur fractures. Sixteen children underwent Ender's nailing and 15 underwent TENS nailing. A significant difference in the coronal plane deformity was found in the TENS nailing group compared with Ender's nailing. The union time and time to weight bearing were significantly shorter for Ender's nailing than TENS nailing. The outcome according to Flynn's criteria was significantly better in the Ender's nailing group. The results of Ender's nailing in paediatric femur fractures were comparable with TENS, with a rapid healing time and reduced angular malunion.

A mini external fixator for hand and finger fractures constructed from readily available materials.

Phalangeal and metacarpal fractures with severe comminution and/or soft tissue compromise can present a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Maintaining viability of the soft tissues while providing rigid fixation of bony injuries is the goal when treating these injuries. Commercially available mini external fixators can help to achieve these goals. However, these devices are costly and are not always available when the surgeon needs them. In this technique study, we discuss the implementation of a mini external fixator using readily available implements in the operating room that is efficient, cost effective, and easy to apply.

Low infection rates after 34,361 intramedullary nail operations in 55 low- and middle-income countries: validation of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) online surgical database.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) supplies intramedullary (IM) nails for the treatment of long bone fractures free of charge to hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Most operations are reported to the SIGN Online Surgical Database (SOSD). Follow-up has been reported to be low, however. We wanted to examine the pattern of follow-up and to assess whether infection rates could be trusted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SOSD contained 36,454 IM nail surgeries in 55 LMICs. We excluded humerus and hip fractures, and fractures without a registered surgical approach. This left 34,361 IM nails for analysis. A generalized additive regression model (gam) was used to explore the association between follow-up rates and infection rates. RESULTS: The overall follow-up rate in the SOSD was 18.1% (95% CI: 17.7-18.5) and national follow-up rates ranged from 0% to 74.2%. The overall infection rate was 0.7% (CI: 0.6-0.8) for femoral fractures and 1.2% (CI: 1.0-1.4) for tibial fractures. If only nails with a registered follow-up visit were included (n = 6,224), infection rates were 3.5% (CI: 3.0-4.1) for femoral fractures and 7.3% (CI: 6.2-8.4) for tibial fractures. We found an increase in infection rates with increasing follow-up rates up to a level of 5%. Follow-up above 5% did not result in increased infection rates. INTERPRETATION: Reported infection rates after IM nailing in the SOSD appear to be reliable and could be used for further research. The low infection rates suggest that IM nailing is a safe procedure also in low- and middle-income countries.

Economic evaluation of reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed and open tibial fractures: results from the study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT).

INTRODUCTION: Recently, results from the large, randomized study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedullary nails in patients with tibial fractures (SPRINT) trial suggested a benefit for reamed intramedullary nail insertion in patients with closed tibial shaft fractures largely based on cost-neutral autodynamizations and a potential advantage for unreamed intramedullary nailing in open fractures. We performed an economic evaluation to compare resource use and effectiveness of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing using a cost-utility analysis. METHODS: We calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each patient from a self-administered health utility index 3 questionnaire for the first 12 months following the intramedullary nailing. A convenience sample of 235 SPRINT patients provided data on costs associated with health care resource utilization. All costs are reported in Canadian dollars for the 2008 financial year. RESULTS: We found incremental effects of -0.017 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.021-0.058) and -0.002 (95% CI -0.060-0.062) QALYs for patients treated with reamed compared with unreamed intramedullary nails in closed and open fractures, respectively. The incremental costs for reamed compared with unreamed intramedullary nailing were $51 Canadian dollars (95% CI -$2298-$2400) in closed tibial fractures and $2546 Canadian dollars (95%CI -$1773-$6864) in open tibial fractures. Unreamed nailing dominated reamed nailing for both closed and open tibial fractures; however, the cost and the utility results had high variability. CONCLUSION: Our economic analysis from a governmental perspective suggests small differences in both cost and effectiveness with large uncertainty between reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing.

Less invasive percutaneous wave plating of simple femur shaft fractures: A prospective series.

In developing nations, fixation of femoral shaft fractures with intramedullary (IM) nails can pose significant challenges. Use of IM implants is commonly limited by availability, funds or patient's physique. Conversely, traditional compression plates are usually readily available at a much lower cost, making bridge plating of femur fractures a frequently used surgical technique. We hypothesised that less invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) of femoral shaft fractures has a similar outcome compared to IM nailing. The study is designed as a prospective case series at a Level 1 university trauma centre. Fifty-seven patients with simple femur shaft fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type A) were enrolled between April 2001 and December 2005 and followed up for a minimum of 1 year or until fracture union. Primary outcome measures included union rate and time to union. Secondary outcome parameters were hardware failure, malalignment, infection and need for revision surgery. The mean age of the study cohort was 24.7 years. Fifty-four patients sustained associated systems injury. Primary union occurred in 54 patients in an average time of 13 weeks. Two patients presented with implant failure, and one patient displayed signs of delayed union. Six patients developed valgus deformities, whereas five patients displayed external rotation malalignment. One patient developed a superficial wound infection, and another presented with a deep infection. Bridge wave plating represents a safe and efficacious treatment alternative to IM nailing for simple femoral shaft fractures in countries where IM nails are limited by availability, costs and patient's physical characteristics.