Ruxolitinib Adherence in Myelofibrosis and Polycythemia Vera: the "RAMP" Italian multicenter prospective study.

Ruxolitinib is beneficial in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and polycythemia vera (PV). Information on ruxolitinib adherence is scant. The Ruxolitinib Adherence in Myelofibrosis and Polycythemia Vera (RAMP) prospective multicenter study (NCT06078319) included 189 ruxolitinib-treated patients. Patients completed the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) and Distress Thermometer and Problem List (DTPL) at the earliest convenience, after registration in the study, and at later timepoints. At week-0, low adherence (ARMS > 14) and high distress (DT ≥ 4) were declared by 49.7% and 40.2% of patients, respectively. The main reason for low adherence was difficult ruxolitinib supply (49%), intentional (4.3%) and unintentional (46.7%) non-take. In multivariable regression analysis, low adherence was associated to male sex (p = 0.001), high distress (p < 0.001), and treatment duration ≥ 1 year (p = 0.03). Over time, rates of low adherence and high distress remained stable, but unintentional non-take decreased from 47.9% to 26.0% at week-48. MF patients with stable high adherence/low distress were more likely to obtain/maintain the spleen response at week-24. Low adherence to ruxolitinib represents an unmet clinical need that require a multifaceted approach, based on reason behind it (patients characteristics and treatment duration). Its recognition may help distinguishing patients who are truly refractory and those in need of therapy optimization.

In silico trial for the assessment of givinostat dose adjustment rules based on the management of key hematological parameters in polycythemia vera patients.

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by excessive levels of platelets (PLT), white blood cells (WBC), and hematocrit (HCT). Givinostat (ITF2357) is a potent histone-deacetylase inhibitor that showed a good safety/efficacy profile in PV patients during phase I/II studies. A phase III clinical trial had been planned and an adaptive dosing protocol had been proposed where givinostat dose is iteratively adjusted every 28 days (one cycle) based on PLT, WBC, and HCT. As support, a simulation platform to evaluate and refine the proposed givinostat dose adjustment rules was developed. A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model predicting the givinostat effects on PLT, WBC, and HCT in PV patients was developed and integrated with a control algorithm implementing the adaptive dosing protocol. Ten in silico trials in ten virtual PV patient populations were simulated 500 times. Considering an eight-treatment cycle horizon, reducing/increasing the givinostat daily dose by 25 mg/day step resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a complete hematological response (CHR), that is, PLT ≤400 × 109 /L, WBC ≤10 × 109 /L, and HCT < 45% without phlebotomies in the last three cycles, and a lower percentage of patients with grade II toxicity events compared with 50 mg/day adjustment steps. After the eighth cycle, 85% of patients were predicted to receive a dose ≥100 mg/day and 40.90% (95% prediction interval = [34, 48.05]) to show a CHR. These results were confirmed at the end of 12th, 18th, and 24th cycles, showing a stability of the response between the eighth and 24th cycles.

Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, for Control of Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera.

BACKGROUND: Polycythemia vera is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis. Rusfertide, an injectable peptide mimetic of the master iron regulatory hormone hepcidin, restricts the availability of iron for erythropoiesis. The safety and efficacy of rusfertide in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera are unknown. METHODS: In part 1 of the international, phase 2 REVIVE trial, we enrolled patients in a 28-week dose-finding assessment of rusfertide. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized withdrawal period in which we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a response, defined by hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, and completion of the trial regimen during part 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by means of the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) patient diary (scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms). RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled in part 1 of the trial, and 59 were assigned to receive rusfertide (30 patients) or placebo (29 patients) in part 2. The estimated mean (±SD) number of phlebotomies per year was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). The mean maximum hematocrit was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 as compared with 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. During part 2, a response was observed in 60% of the patients who received rusfertide as compared with 17% of those who received placebo (P = 0.002). Between baseline and the end of part 1, rusfertide treatment was associated with a decrease in individual symptom scores on the MPN-SAF in patients with moderate or severe symptoms at baseline. During parts 1 and 2, grade 3 adverse events occurred in 13% of the patients, and none of the patients had a grade 4 or 5 event. Injection-site reactions of grade 1 or 2 in severity were common. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with polycythemia vera, rusfertide treatment was associated with a mean hematocrit of less than 45% during the 28-week dose-finding period, and the percentage of patients with a response during the 12-week randomized withdrawal period was greater with rusfertide than with placebo. (Funded by Protagonist Therapeutics; REVIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04057040.).

Prolonged Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Thrombohemorrhagic Risk in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera Patients Treated with Long-Term Aspirin: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to decrease the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential pharmacodynamic interactions of PPIs and antiplatelet drugs with respect to cardiovascular risk. Patients with BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and polycythemia vera (PV) often suffer from peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and frequently receive low-dose aspirin due to an intrinsically high thrombotic risk. METHOD: This retrospective multicenter study from a community setting investigated whether continuous PPI use may affect thrombohemorrhagic risk in ET and PV patients treated with long-term aspirin. RESULTS: Ninety-four aspirin-treated MPN patients (ET = 36, PV = 58) were included; median age was 69.5 years (range 21-92) and 40 (42.6%) were males. Nineteen (20.2%) patients continuously received PPIs and pantoprazole (n = 15, 78.9%) was the most frequently received PPI. PV phenotype (p = 0.085), male sex (p = 0.011), and prior thrombosis (p = 0.005) were associated with PPI use, whereas no correlations were found with respect to age, disease risk, splenomegaly, mutational status, constitutional symptoms, cardiovascular risk factors, cytoreductive treatment, or any of the blood cell counts (p > 0.050 for all analyses). The median follow-up time was 55.5 months; 19 (20.2%) thrombotic and 13 (13.8%) bleeding events occurred during this time. The use of PPIs was not associated with an increased risk of thrombosis (p = 0.158) or overall bleeding (p = 0.229) and none of the patients treated with PPIs experienced GI bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that Helicobacter pylori infection and PUD are quite frequent in ET and PV patients, these preliminary results may provide some reassurance to physicians regarding the absence of thrombohemorrhagic risk associated with prolonged PPI use in MPN patients treated with long-term aspirin. Our observations may be even more important in the light of recent evidence suggesting suboptimal platelet inhibition in ET with once-daily when compared to twice- or triple-daily aspirin which may also cause more abdominal discomfort. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design, limited number of patients included, and the lack of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments.

Risk factors for disease progression and treatment goals in polycythemia vera.

Polycythemia vera is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by the clonal proliferation of hematopoietic cells, leading to the overproduction of erythrocytes and the elaboration of inflammatory cytokines. Management is aimed at reducing the risk of thromboembolic events, alleviating the symptom burden, decreasing splenomegaly, and potentially mitigating the risk of disease progression. Existing treatment options include therapeutic phlebotomy and cytoreductive agents including hydroxyurea, pegylated recombinant interferon alpha 2a, ropegylated recombinant interferon alpha 2b, and ruxolitinib. We review risk factors for both thrombotic events and disease progression in patients with polycythemia vera. We discuss existing and novel therapeutic approaches to mitigate the risk of disease-related complications and progression.

Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Hydroxyurea-Resistant and -Intolerant Polycythemia Vera Patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who exhibit hydroxyurea-resistance (HU-R) and -intolerance (HU-I) may have distinct characteristics and clinical outcomes. However, to date, no studies have reported a comparison between these two groups or assessed prognostic factors in these patients. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and identify prognostic factors among PV patients with HU-R or HU-I. We conducted a review of PV patients who received frontline treatment with HU from nine centers and identified 90 patients with HU-R or HU-I. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of thrombosis after 7 years of HU-R/I was 21.4%, and the incidence of disease progression was 22.5%. Comparing the HU-R and HU-I groups, the HU-R group had a significantly higher rate of disease progression (36.7% vs. 0.56%, P = 0.009), while there was no significant difference in thrombosis incidence (19.0% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.463). Multivariate analysis revealed that HU-R was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 6.27, 95% confidence interval, 1.83-21.47, P = 0.003). Additionally, higher lactate dehydrogenase levels, multiple cardiovascular risk factors, and prior thrombosis were identified as unfavorable predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that patients with HU-R face a higher risk of hematological transformation, but have a comparable risk of thrombosis to patients with HU intolerance. These distinctions should guide decisions on second-line treatment options and clinical trials involving these patients.

Ropeginterferon phase 2 randomized study in low-risk polycythemia vera: 5-year drug survival and efficacy outcomes.

In patients with low-risk polycythemia vera, exposure to low-dose Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (Ropeg) 100 µg every 2 weeks for 2 years was more effective than the standard treatment of therapeutic phlebotomy in maintaining target hematocrit (HCT) (< 45%) with a reduction in the need for phlebotomy without disease progression. In the present paper, we analyzed drug survival, defined as a surrogate measure of the efficacy, safety, adherence, and tolerability of Ropeg in patients followed up to 5 years. During the first 2 years, Ropeg and phlebotomy-only (Phl-O) were discontinued in 33% and 70% of patients, respectively, for lack of response (12 in the Ropeg arm vs. 34 in the Phl-O arm) or adverse events (6 vs. 0) and withdrawal of consent in (3 vs. 10). Thirty-six Ropeg responders continued the drug for up to 3 years, and the probability of drug survival after a median of 3.15 years was 59%. Notably, the primary composite endpoint was maintained in 97%, 94%, and 94% of patients still on drug at 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, and 60% of cases were phlebotomy-free. Twenty-three of 63 Phl-O patients (37%) failed the primary endpoint and were crossed over to Ropeg; among the risk factors for this failure, the need for more than three bloodletting procedures in the first 6 months emerged as the most important determinant. In conclusion, to improve the effectiveness of Ropeg, we suggest increasing the dose and using it earlier driven by high phlebotomy need in the first 6 months post-diagnosis.

Silent Thyroiditis Associated with Ropeginterferon α-2b in a Patient with Polycythemia Vera.

Interferon is an emerging treatment option for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially for polycythemia vera (PV). Previous studies of interferon used therapeutically for hepatitis C have demonstrated that one of the most important adverse events associated with interferon treatment is thyroid dysfunction, and a management strategy for thyroid dysfunction has been established. However, whether or not the recommendation is also suitable for MPN settings is unclear. In this study, one PV patient developed silent thyroiditis during a phase 2 study of ropeginterferon α-2b. This case suggests that thyroid dysfunction is an important clinical issue to consider in interferon treatment for PV.

Analysis of real-world data demonstrating the efficacy of current management of polycythaemia vera in attaining and maintaining therapeutic haematocrit.

BACKGROUND: Polycythaemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, typically driven by acquired JAK2 mutation and characterised by elevated red cell mass and increased risk of thrombotic events. Patients are managed with phlebotomy to maintain haematocrit (Hct) < 0.45, and patients stratified as 'high risk' for thrombosis are additionally treated with cytoreductive agents to attain this target. STUDY: This analysis of newly diagnosed JAK2 mutant PV patients (n = 50) over 2 years aimed to determine how effectively patients attained and maintained target Hct according to recommended practice. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients spent the majority of time in target Hct range. Findings are supportive of current management guidelines.

Ruxolitinib in patients with polycythemia vera resistant and/or intolerant to hydroxyurea: European observational study.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxyurea (HU) is a commonly used first-line treatment in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). However, approximately 15%-24% of PV patients report intolerance and resistance to HU. METHODS: This phase IV, European, real-world, observational study assessed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in PV patients who were resistant and/or intolerant to HU, with a 24-month follow-up. The primary objective was to describe the profile and disease burden of PV patients. RESULTS: In the 350 enrolled patients, 70% were >60 years old. Most patients (59.4%) had received ≥1 phlebotomy in the 12 months prior to the first dose of ruxolitinib. Overall, 68.2% of patients achieved hematocrit control with 92.3% patients having hematocrit <45% and 35.4% achieved hematologic remission at month 24. 85.1% of patients had no phlebotomies during the study. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 54.3% of patients and the most common event was anemia (22.6%). Of the 10 reported deaths, two were suspected to be study drug-related. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that ruxolitinib treatment in PV maintains durable hematocrit control with a decrease in the number of phlebotomies in the majority of patients and was generally well tolerated.

Association between elevated white blood cell counts and thrombotic events in polycythemia vera: analysis from REVEAL.

ABSTRACT: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells and is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events (TEs). Established risk factors for TEs in patients with PV include advanced age, TE history, and elevated hematocrit. Although an association of TE with elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts has been suggested by retrospective studies, this relationship needs further validation. The prospective observational study of patients with polycythemia vera in US clinical practices (REVEAL) study collected prospective clinical data from 2510 patients with PV with a median follow-up of 44.7 months (range, 2-59 months) from enrollment. Using time-dependent covariate Cox proportional hazards models, blood counts were individually modeled with sex, age, disease duration, TE history at enrollment (baseline covariates), and treatment (time-dependent covariate). Analysis of 2271 participants identified 142 TEs in 106 patients. Significant associations with initial TE occurrence during the study period were observed for hematocrit level >45% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.234-2.749; P = .0028) and WBCs >11 × 109/L (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.598-3.465; P < .0001). Elevated WBC count was significantly associated with initial TE occurrence in both low-risk and high-risk PV. When hematocrit was controlled at ≤45%, WBC count >12 × 109/L was significantly associated with TE occurrence (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.066-3.554; P = .0300). The results support incorporation of WBC count into PV risk stratification and studies of treatment strategies, and indicate the importance of controlling both hematocrit and WBC count in disease management. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02252159.

SOHO State of the Art Update and Next Questions: Novel Therapies for Polycythemia Vera.

In the recent years, landmark advancements in the treatment of polycythemia vera (PV) have been achieved. We witnessed the regulatory approval of ropeginterferon and the advanced clinical development of other novel agents that may affect the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease. Agents with the potential of disease modification may soon overtake preceding treatment options that were based on the patient's age and history of thrombosis. Recent studies using ropeginterferon in low-risk PV patients earlier in the disease course challenge the current treatment paradigm and shift the focus on modifying the course of the disease. Hepcidin mimetics offer an excellent alternative to phlebotomy, providing better quality of life, and may lead to improved outcomes in PV by tight hematocrit control. Novel agents, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors, hold promise to complement the therapeutic landscape of PV and might be particularly promising in rationale combinations. Ruxolitinib is well established as an approved second-line treatment for PV. In the frontline setting, the precise role of ruxolitinib, which also represents an appealing agent in combination regimens, will be determined in ongoing research studies. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess whether novel agents/regimens elicit fewer thromboembolic/ hemorrhagic events and halt disease progression to myelofibrosis and acute myeloid leukemia. We aspire that disease-modifying approaches in PV are on the horizon, and that we will be empowered to ultimately change the natural course of the disease and profoundly impact the lives of PV patients in the near future.

A safety evaluation of ruxolitinib for the treatment of polycythemia vera.

INTRODUCTION: Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm hallmarked by deregulated proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells leading to prevalent expansion of red cell mass, increased rate of vascular events, splenomegaly, disease-associated symptoms, and risk of evolution to secondary myelofibrosis and blast phase. PV is pathogenetically associated with autonomously persistent activation of JAK2, which causes overproduction of blood cells and an inflammatory condition responsible for the clinical manifestations of the disease. Extensively supported by preclinical studies, targeting JAK2-dependent signaling represents a rational therapeutic approach to PV, finally leading to the approval of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor. AREAS COVERED (LITERATURE RESEARCH): We analyzed reports of phase 2 and phase 3 trials with ruxolitinib in PV and relevant literature dealing with efficacy and safety aspects, including most recent real-world reports. EXPERT OPINION: Ruxolitinib is the only JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of PV with well-known efficacy for splenomegaly, symptoms, and potentially reduction of vascular events. The treatment regimen is notably manageable and safe, with the most prevalent side effects primarily encompassing myelosuppression, hyperlipidemia, non-melanoma skin cancer and infections, mainly reactivation of Herpes Zoster. These effects necessitate ongoing surveillance and proactive preventive measures.

Change in Polycythemia Vera Treatment: Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b in Light of Current Trials

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (RopegIFN) enables effective cytoreduction in polycythemia vera (PV). Recent analyses suggest that long-term RopegIFN therapy fulfills treatment goals important to patients with PV including good quality of life, the slowing of disease progression, and long event-free survival. Data support the use of RopegIFN in both early PV therapy and second-line and beyond.

Effectiveness of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B in High-Risk Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms- Evaluation of Clinicohaematologic Response, and Safety Profile: Single Centre Experience.

Background: Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph - MPNs) requires individualized approach depending on multiple factors. Novel pegylated Interferon (IFN) formulations have become an attractive therapeutic option in young Ph- MPN patients associated with better patient compliance. Methods: In this retrospective observational study a total of 16 high-risk Ph- MPN patients treated off-label with ropeginterferon alfa-2b given twice monthly, were included. Median follow-up was 24 months. High-risk patients were defined using the IPSET score. Response to treatment was evaluated using ELN, IWG-MET EUMNET standardized criteria and occurrence of side effects was documented. Results: 11 patients were female (68.8%) and 5 male (31.2%); average age at diagnosis was 36 years (17-51); 12 patients (75%) had ET, one (6.2%) PV and three (18.8%) hypercellular phase of PMF. JAK2V617F mutation was detected in 10 patients (62.5%), CALR in three (18.8%), and three (18.7%) were triple-negative cases. In 7 patients (43.7%), ropeginterferon alfa-2b was used in first-line, and 9 (56.3%) were previously treated with HU and/or standard IFN. Among initially ropeginterferon alfa-2b treated patients, complete haematological response was observed in 4/7 (57.1%), partial in 2/7 (28.6%) and suboptimal in one (14.3%). Complete haematological response was observed in 8/9 (88.9%) among previously treated patients. Average time to blood count normalization was 8 weeks, at a dose ranging between 100mcg and 300mcg. Side effects were observed in one patient (6.2%). Conclusion: Our experience is in support of previous studies regarding ropeginterferon alfa-2b efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of young patients with Ph- MPNs.

Long-acting interferon: pioneering disease modification of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells. The malignant clones produce cytokines that drive self-perpetuating inflammatory responses and tend to transform into more aggressive clones, leading to disease progression. The progression of MPNs follows a biological sequence from the early phases of malignancy, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia, to advanced myelofibrosis and leukemic transformation. To date, the treatment of MPNs has focused on preventing thrombosis by decreasing blood cell counts and relieving disease-related symptoms. However, interferon (IFN) has been used to treat MPNs because of its ability to attack cancer cells directly and modulate the immune system. IFN also has the potential to modulate diseases by inhibiting JAK2 mutations, and recent studies have demonstrated clinical and molecular improvements. Long-acting IFN is administered less frequently and has fewer adverse effects than conventional IFN. The current state of research on long-acting IFN in patients with MPNs is discussed, along with future directions.

[Interferon therapy for polycythemia vera].

The effectiveness of interferon (IFN) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) including polycythemia vera (PV) has been reported for more than three decades. However, because of its toxicity and tolerability, the use of IFN has been restricted. With the recent development of pegylated-IFN, the use of IFN has been highlighted again for effectively treating MPNs. Guidelines in Western countries recommend IFN as the first choice for cytoreduction alongside hydroxyurea, particularly for young and pregnant patients. Furthermore, a novel IFN, ropeginterferon alfa-2b, allows biweekly injection and exhibits durable high hematological and molecular responses leading to the approvement of its use in Western countries. Although IFN is not yet been approved for use against PV in Japan's National Health Insurance System as of February 2023, a phase 2 study has shown efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Japanese patients with PV, providing hope for future development.

[Novel therapeutics in myeloproliferative neoplasms: beyond JAK inhibitors].

The discovery of driver genes such as JAK2 in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) led to a better understanding of MPN pathogenesis as a constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT signal. Following these findings, several types of JAK inhibitors have been developed. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor licensed for polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis, demonstrated efficacy in regulating hematocrit levels, lowering spleen volume, and relieving MPN-related symptoms. However, some patients with myelofibrosis are refractory to JAK inhibitors, and some are intolerant due to cytopenia. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors did not slow the progression of acute leukemia, indicating the need for new therapeutic methods for myelofibrosis. Novel medicines, including BCL inhibitor, MDM2 inhibitor, LSD1 inhibitor, PI3K inhibitor, BET inhibitor and telomerase inhibitor, are presently being evaluated in clinical studies for myelofibrosis with the potential to enhance clinical outcomes.

Management of classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in Asia: consensus of the Asian Myeloid Working Group.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized clinically by the proliferation of one or more hematopoietic lineage(s). The classical Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph)-negative MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The Asian Myeloid Working Group (AMWG) comprises representatives from fifteen Asian centers experienced in the management of MPN. This consensus from the AMWG aims to review the current evidence in the risk stratification and treatment of Ph-negative MPN, to identify management gaps for future improvement, and to offer pragmatic approaches for treatment commensurate with different levels of resources, drug availabilities and reimbursement policies in its constituent regions. The management of MPN should be patient-specific and based on accurate diagnostic and prognostic tools. In patients with PV, ET and early/prefibrotic PMF, symptoms and risk stratification will guide the need for early cytoreduction. In younger patients requiring cytoreduction and in those experiencing resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea, recombinant interferon-α preparations (pegylated interferon-α 2A or ropeginterferon-α 2b) should be considered. In myelofibrosis, continuous risk assessment and symptom burden assessment are essential in guiding treatment selection. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in MF should always be based on accurate risk stratification for disease-risk and post-HSCT outcome. Management of classical Ph-negative MPN entails accurate diagnosis, cytogenetic and molecular evaluation, risk stratification, and treatment strategies that are outcome-oriented (curative, disease modification, improvement of quality-of-life).

Top advances of the year: Myeloproliferative neoplasms.

The rapid pace of drug development in hematology has led to multiple approvals for myelofibrosis (MF) and polycythemia vera (PV) in recent years. Moreover, there are many innovative agents and combinations being explored for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). In the past year, there have been several advances in MF, PV, and essential thrombocythemia. In MF, investigational approaches are focusing on strategies to optimize inhibition of signal transduction (including JAK inhibition), modify epigenetics, enhance apoptosis, target DNA replication, transform host immunity, and/or alter the tumor microenvironment. In PV, ropeginterferon alfa-2b has been introduced to the market in the United States, and data continue to accumulate to support the safety and efficacy of this treatment. Hepcidin mimesis is also emerging as a novel way to treat erythrocytosis. In essential thrombocythemia, ropeginterferon alfa-2b is being evaluated, as are therapies to modify epigenetics and inhibit CALR. The enhanced focus on MPNs brings hope that our field can improve morbidity and mortality in this group of diseases.