The clinical utility of procainamide-induced late potentials on the signal averaged ECG.

BACKGROUND: Late potentials (LPs) identified on the signal averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) are a marker for an increased risk of arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome (BrS). Procainamide is a sodium channel blocker used to diagnose BrS. The effects of Procainamide on the SAECG in those with BrS and the significance of Procainamide-induced LPs are unknown. METHODS: Procainamide provocation was performed for suspected BrS with 12-lead and SAECG pre- and post-infusion. Filtered QRS duration (fQRSd), duration of low amplitude signals <40 µV (LAS40) and root-mean-square voltage in the terminal 40 ms (RMS40) were determined. RESULTS: Data from 150 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 44.5 years, 109 males). Procainamide increased fQRSd (Pre 118.8 ± 10.5 ms, post 121.2 ± 10.2 ms, p < 0.001) and LAS40 (Pre 38.7 ± 9.8 ms, post 40.2 ± 10.5 ms, p = 0.005) and decreased RMS40 (Pre 24.6 ± 12 ms, post 22.8 ± 12 ms, p = 0.002). LPs were present in 68/150 (45%) at baseline. Fifteen patients with negative baseline SAECGs had LPs unmasked by Procainamide, but six patients had LPs at baseline that were no longer present following Procainamide. Comparing those with normal hearts (n = 48) to those with a final diagnosis of BrS (n = 38), Procainamide prolonged fQRSd to a greater extent in those with BrS. Comparing those with Procainamide-induced LPs to those with no LPs at any time did not highlight any aspect of phenotype and did not correlate with a history of ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Procainamide influences the SAECG, provoking LPs in a small proportion of patients. However, there is no evidence that Procainamide-induced LPs provide additional diagnostic information or aid risk stratification.

Bedside Electrophysiological Study Using a Temporary Pacemaker May Predict Recurrence of Atrioventricular Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

High-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) or complete heart block (CHB) is a common complication associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, some patients with HAVB/CHB recover with time. The results of electrophysiological studies (EPSs) using permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients with suspicious HAVB/CHB are considered controversial.This study aimed to evaluate whether HAVB/CHB induction at the bedside using a temporary pacemaker can predict recurrence in patients who had recovered from HAVB/CHB after TAVR.We enrolled a total of 11 patients who had recovered from HAVB/CHB and evaluated their electrophysiology using right ventricular pacing and/or procainamide administration.HAVB/CHB induction was positive. Three patients tested positive for HAVB/CHB, whereas 8 tested negative. The ejection fraction and the interval between HAVB/CHB onset and EPS were found to be significant. HAVB/CHB positive patients underwent PPI. A patient with a balloon-expandable valve tested positive just before recovery of CHB, but tested negative 5 days later and was included in the negative group. The 4 patients who tested negative received a cardiovascular implantable electric device (CIED). We observed HAVB/CHB in 2 patients who had previously tested positive after 3 months. Among those who tested negative, those with CIED had no HAVB/CHB, and others showed neither HAVB/CHB on electrocardiogram nor experienced syncope or sudden death.Our EPS revealed that HAVB/CHB induction may predict HAVB/CHB recurrence after TAVR. Valve type and EPS timing may affect the results.

Implementation of a Procainamide-Based Cardioversion Strategy for the Management of Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) remains the most common rhythm disturbance in adult patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs). Although pharmacologic cardioversion has been established as safe and effective in recent-onset AF, its use in U.S. EDs is uncommon. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) procainamide for pharmacologic cardioversion in patients presenting to the ED with AF of <48-hr duration. Patients presenting to the ED with recent-onset AF (<48 hr) undergoing a cardioversion strategy with IV procainamide from 2017 to 2019 were reviewed. Clinical outcomes assessed included rates of cardioversion, hospital admission, stroke, and return ED visits for arrhythmia or serious adverse events. A total of 64 patients received procainamide therapy-60.9% achieved cardioversion and 35.9% were admitted to the hospital. The mean dose was 1062.4 mg (12.1 mg/kg). No patients returned to the ED secondary to stroke and 9.4% experienced complications attributed to procainamide, the most common being hypotension. Within 30 days of therapy, 20.3% of patients returned to the ED secondary to arrhythmia recurrence. Patients experiencing cardioversion with procainamide were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (25.6% vs. 52.0%; p = 0.04) or receive a rate control agent (17.9% vs. 64.0%; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of 30-day return between those who experienced pharmacologic cardioversion and those who did not (p = 0.220). The implementation of a procainamide-based acute cardioversion strategy for patients presenting to the ED with recent-onset AF resulted in a 60% cardioversion rate, which was associated with a significantly higher rate of discharge from the ED. Transient hypotension was the most common adverse event. Further investigation into ED-based protocols for management of recent-onset AF is necessary to better understand their safety and efficacy.

A Multicenter Randomized Trial to Evaluate a Chemical-first or Electrical-first Cardioversion Strategy for Patients With Uncomplicated Acute Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) patients with uncomplicated atrial fibrillation (AF) of less than 48 hours may be safely managed with rhythm control. Although both chemical-first and electrical-first strategies have been advocated, there are no comparative effectiveness data to guide clinicians. METHODS: At six urban Canadian centers, ED patients ages 18 to 75 with uncomplicated symptomatic AF of less than 48 hours and CHADS2 score of 0 or 1 were randomized using concealed allocation in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following strategies: 1) chemical cardioversion with procainamide infusion, followed by electrical countershock if unsuccessful; or 2) electrical cardioversion, followed by procainamide infusion if unsuccessful. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged within 4 hours of arrival. Secondary outcomes included ED length-of-stay (LOS); prespecified ED-based adverse events; and 30-day ED revisits, hospitalizations, strokes, deaths, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were analyzed: 41 in the chemical-first group and 43 in the electrical-first group. Groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, vital signs, and CHADS2 scores. All patients were discharged home, with 83 (99%) in sinus rhythm. In the chemical-first group, 13 of 41 patients (32%) were discharged within 4 hours compared to 29 of 43 patients (67%) in the electrical-first group (p = 0.001). In the chemical-first group, the median ED LOS was 5.1 hours (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.5 to 5.9 hours) compared to 3.5 hours (IQR = 2.4 to 4.6 hours) in the electrical-first group, for a median difference of 1.2 hours (95% confidence interval = 0.4 to 2.0 hours, p < 0.001). No patients experienced stroke or death. All other outcomes, including adverse events, ED revisits, and QoL, were similar. CONCLUSION: In uncomplicated ED AF patients managed with rhythm control, chemical-first and electrical-first strategies both appear to be successful and well tolerated; however, an electrical-first strategy results in a significantly shorter ED LOS.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a sustained-release compounded procainamide preparation after 24-h (acute) administration in normal dogs.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of a compounded sustained-release procainamide formulation in normal dogs. ANIMALS: Six healthy, purpose-bred mixed-breed dogs participated in the study. METHODS: In phase I, two dogs were administered oral procainamide (30 mg/kg), and plasma was obtained to determine plasma concentration ranges and duration. In phase II, six dogs were administered procainamide (30 mg/kg by mouth every 12 hours) to determine the pharmacokinetics of sustained-release procainamide. Serum procainamide concentration was determined using an immunochemistry assay. RESULTS: No adverse clinical effects were noted in any of the dogs studied. The average maximum serum concentration, average serum concentration, and average minimum serum concentration were 10.17, 7.13, and 3.07 µg/mL, respectively. The average time over a 12-h period during which procainamide concentration exceeded 12 µg/mL was 2.35 h, was between 4 and 12 µg/mL was 7.19 h, and was less than 4 µg/mL was 2.46 h. The average times at maximum concentration and minimum concentration were 18.67 and 12.25 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of sustained-release procainamide twice daily achieved targeted plasma concentrations in most dogs. Evaluation of serum trough concentrations should be considered owing to interanimal variability to confirm that serum concentrations are within the reported therapeutic range for an individual patient.

Intravenous Amiodarone and Sotalol Impair Contractility and Cardiac Output, but Procainamide Does Not: A Langendorff Study.

INTRODUCTION: Direct comparison of the effects of antiarrhythmic agents on myocardial performance may be useful in choosing between medications in critically ill patients. Studies directly comparing multiple antiarrhythmic medications are lacking. The use of an experimental heart preparation permits examination of myocardial performance under constant loading conditions. METHODS: Hearts of Sprague Dawley rats (n = 35, 402-507 g) were explanted and cannulated in working heart model with fixed preload and afterload. Each heart was then exposed to a 3-hour infusion of procainamide (20 µg/kg/min), esmolol (100 or 200 µg/kg/min), amiodarone (10 or 20 mg/kg/d), sotalol (80 mg/m2/d), or placebo infusions (n = 5 per dose). Cardiac output, contractility (dP/dTmax), diastolic performance (dP/dTmin), and heart rate were compared between groups over time by linear mixed modeling. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, sotalol decreased contractility by an average of 24% ( P < .001) over the infusion period, as did amiodarone (low dose by 13%, P = .029; high dose by 14%, P = .013). Compared with placebo, mean cardiac output was significantly lower in animals treated with sotalol (by 22%, P = .016) and esmolol 200 µg/kg/min (by 23%, P = .012). Over time, amiodarone decreased cardiac output (20 mg/kg/d, ß = -89 [-144, -33] µL/min2 decrease, P = .002) and also worsened diastolic function, decreasing dP/dTmin by ∼18% and 22% ( P = .032 and P = .011, low and high doses, respectively). Procainamide did not have a significant effect on any measures of systolic or diastolic performance. CONCLUSIONS: In isolated hearts, amiodarone and sotalol depressed myocardial contractility, cardiac output, and diastolic function. However, procainamide did not negatively affect myocardial performance and represents a favorable agent in settings of therapeutic equivalence.

Randomized comparison of intravenous procainamide vs. intravenous amiodarone for the acute treatment of tolerated wide QRS tachycardia: the PROCAMIO study.

AIMS: Intravenous procainamide and amiodarone are drugs of choice for well-tolerated ventricular tachycardia. However, the choice between them, even according to Guidelines, is unclear. We performed a multicentre randomized open-labelled study to determine the safety and efficacy of intravenous procainamide and amiodarone for the acute treatment of tolerated wide QRS complex (probably ventricular) tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous procainamide (10 mg/kg/20 min) or amiodarone (5 mg/kg/20 min). The primary endpoint was the incidence of major predefined cardiac adverse events within 40 min after infusion initiation. Of 74 patients included, 62 could be analysed. The primary endpoint occurred in 3 of 33 (9%) procainamide and 12 of 29 (41%) amiodarone patients (odd ratio, OR = 0.1; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.03-0.6; P = 0.006). Tachycardia terminated within 40 min in 22 (67%) procainamide and 11 (38%) amiodarone patients (OR = 3.3; 95% CI 1.2-9.3; P = 0.026). In the following 24 h, adverse events occurred in 18% procainamide and 31% amiodarone patients (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.15-1.61; P: 0.24). Among 49 patients with structural heart disease, the primary endpoint was less common in procainamide patients (3 [11%] vs. 10 [43%]; OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04-0.73, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This study compares for the first time in a randomized design intravenous procainamide and amiodarone for the treatment of the acute episode of sustained monomorphic well-tolerated (probably) ventricular tachycardia. Procainamide therapy was associated with less major cardiac adverse events and a higher proportion of tachycardia termination within 40 min.

Best Clinical Practice: Emergency Medicine Management of Stable Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation are the causes of approximately 300,000 deaths per year in the United States. VT is classified based on hemodynamic status and appearance. Stable, monomorphic VT treatment is controversial. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to provide emergency physicians with an evidence-based review of the medical management of stable, monomorphic VT. DISCUSSION: Stable, monomorphic VT is part of a larger class of ventricular dysrhythmias defined by a rate of at least 120 beats/min with QRS > 120 ms without regularly occurring P:QRS association. Little controversy exists for the treatment of hemodynamically unstable VT. The medical management of hemodynamically stable monomorphic VT is surrounded by controversy. Direct current cardioversion is most efficacious. Guidelines for the treatment of stable VT from the American Heart Association provide a IIa recommendation for procainamide, compared with a IIb recommendation for both amiodarone and sotalol. Studies evaluating procainamide, lidocaine, amiodarone, and sotalol suffer from poor design, difference in inclusion and exclusion criteria, small sample size, and outcome determination. Procainamide demonstrates the greatest efficacy. If procainamide is selected, a maximum dose of 10 mg/kg at 50-100 mg/min intravenous (IV) over 10-20 min should be provided with monitoring of blood pressure and electrocardiogram. Monomorphic VT with acute myocardial ischemia requires further study. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal management of stable, monomorphic VT includes direct current cardioversion. If medical management is chosen, procainamide is most efficacious, though current literature suffers from poor design.

Cardiac Abnormalities in First-Degree Relatives of Unexplained Cardiac Arrest Victims: A Report From the Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry.

BACKGROUND: Unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) may be explained by inherited arrhythmia syndromes. The Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry prospectively assessed first-degree relatives of UCA or sudden unexplained death victims to screen for cardiac abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Around 398 first-degree family members (186 UCA, 212 sudden unexplained death victims' relatives; mean age, 44±17 years) underwent extensive cardiac workup, including ECG, signal averaged ECG, exercise testing, cardiac imaging, Holter-monitoring, and selective provocative drug testing with epinephrine or procainamide. Genetic testing was performed when a mutation was identified in the UCA survivor or when the diagnostic workup revealed a phenotype suggestive of a specific inherited arrhythmia syndrome. The diagnostic strength was classified as definite, probable, or possible based on previously published definitions. Cardiac abnormalities were detected in 120 of 398 patients (30.2%) with 67 of 398 having a definite or probable diagnosis (17%), including Long-QT syndrome (13%), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (4%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (4%), and Brugada syndrome (3%). The detection yield was similar for family members of UCA and sudden unexplained death victims (31% versus 27%; P=0.59). Genetic testing was performed more often in family members of UCA patients (29% versus 20%; P=0.03). Disease-causing mutations were identified in 20 of 398 relatives (5%). The most common pathogenic mutations were RyR2 (2%), SCN5A (1%), and KNCQ1 (0.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac screening revealed abnormalities in 30% of first-degree relatives of UCA or sudden unexplained death victims, with a clear working diagnosis in 17%. Long-QT, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia were the most common diagnoses. Systematic cascade screening and genetic testing in asymptomatic individuals will lead to preventive lifestyle and medical interventions with potential to prevent sudden cardiac death. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00292032.

Procainamide infusion in the evaluation of unexplained cardiac arrest: from the Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER).

BACKGROUND: Provocative testing with sodium channel blockers is advocated for the evaluation of unexplained cardiac arrest (UCA) with the primary purpose of unmasking the typical ECG features of Brugada syndrome. The Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER) systematically assesses subjects with UCA or a family history of sudden death (FHSD). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical yield of procainamide infusion in a national registry of subjects with either UCA or a FHSD. METHODS: Subjects with either UCA or a FHSD without evidence of a Brugada pattern at baseline underwent procainamide testing (15 mg/kg to a maximum of 1 g at 50 mg/min). A test was considered positive for Brugada pattern if there was an increase in ST elevation >1 mm or if there was >1 mm of new ST elevation in leads V1 and/or V2. Genetic testing was performed on the basis of phenotype detection. RESULTS: Procainamide testing was performed in 174 subjects (age 46.8 ± 15.4 years, 47% female). Testing provoked a Brugada pattern in 12 subjects (6.9%), 5 of whom had no ST abnormalities at baseline. No subjects with a negative procainamide challenge were subsequently diagnosed with Brugada syndrome. Genetic testing was conducted in 10 of the 12 subjects with a provoked Brugada pattern and was positive for a mutation in the SCN5A gene in 1. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the baseline ECG, procainamide testing provoked a Brugada pattern in a significant proportion of subjects with UCA or a FHSD, thereby facilitating a diagnosis of Brugada syndrome, and is recommended in the workup of UCA.

Transmissão hereditária da morte súbita cardíaca nas canalopatias / Hereditary transmission of sudden cardiac death in channelopathies

O caso clínico sugere uma forma rara de canalopatia mista, cujo sintoma clínico e eletrocardiográfico indicava taquicardia ventricular polimórfica catecolaminérgica (TVPC). Porém, ao realizar o teste ergométrico, no pós-esforço, quando há predomínio do sistema nervoso parassimpático, nota-se a indução de eletrocardiograma (ECG) compatível com Brugada do tipo I. Outro aspecto importante foi a transmissão hereditária observada neste caso, em que os avós do paciente eram primos de primeiro grau e houve seis casos de morte súbita cardíaca (MSC) nas gerações subsequentes, com irmão que teve MSC aos 5 anos durante uma crise de choro, mostrando um importante fator genético e familiar relacionado às canalopatias.

The clinical case suggests a rare form of mixed channelopathy, whose clinical and electrocardiographic symptom suggested catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). However, when the exercise test was performed, during post-exercise, where there is a predominance of the parasympathetic nervous system, there was an electrocardiogram (ECG) induction compatible with Brugada type I. Another important aspect was the hereditary transmission observed in this patient, whose grandfathers were first cousins, and 6 cases of sudden cardiac death (SCD) were observed in subsequent generations and one brother had SCD at 5 years of age during a crying episode, showing an important genetic and familial factor related to channelopathies.

Efficacy of procainamide and lidocaine in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in terminating sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) was assessed in a retrospective manner to provide a basis for recommending their use. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 90 patients were included in this study to evaluate the efficacy to terminate SMVT using procainamide or lidocaine. All patients were alert and responsive. The mean systolic blood pressure was 91+/-25 mmHg (range, 40-150 mmHg). SMVT was diagnosed from ECG recordings and later in an electrophysiologic study. VTs with a cycle length of 329+/-55 and 324+/-61 ms were treated with the mean doses of 358+/-50 mg and 81+/-30 mg of procainamide and lidocaine and were terminated in 53/70 (75.7%) and in 7/20 (35.0%) respectively. The drugs were discontinued if there was no rise in blood pressure after slowing of the tachycardia rate or if there were signs of impending deterioration in consciousness. Though procainamide was effective, blood pressure was often low and DC shock should be available at all times during administration of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Procainamide, the relatively older drug, was more effective than lidocaine in terminating SMVT associated with structural heart diseases. This is a retrospective analysis but can form the basis for formulating guidelines for initial management of SMVT.

Amiodarone versus procainamide for the acute treatment of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous amiodarone and procainamide are both used as therapies for refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). However, no studies have compared the efficacy and safety of these agents in pediatric patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients treated with intravenous amiodarone or procainamide during 25 consecutive months for the following mechanisms of SVT were included: orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia, intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia, and ectopic atrial tachycardia; junctional ectopic tachycardia was excluded. Treatment response was categorized as full success, partial success, or failure. Partial success was defined as clinical improvement and/or arrhythmia control but not meeting full success criteria. Adverse events were classified as major (requiring resuscitation) or minor (management changes). There were 40 episodes of SVT in 37 patients (median age, 34 days; 24 with congenital heart disease). Amiodarone was the initial therapy in 26 cases and procainamide in 14 cases. If partial and full success are combined, procainamide was successful in 71% of cases compared with 34% for amiodarone (P=0.046). If partial success is considered a treatment failure, procainamide was successful in 50% compared with 15% for amiodarone (P=0.029). Ten patients received the second medication after the first failed. Success was achieved in 5 of 8 amiodarone-to-procainamide crossovers compared with 1 of 2 procainamide-to-amiodarone crossovers. One major and 10 minor adverse events occurred in amiodarone patients versus 6 minor adverse events in procainamide patients (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, procainamide achieved greater success compared with amiodarone in the management of recurrent SVT without statistically significant differences in adverse event frequency.

Layered bionanocomposites as carrier for procainamide.

The study deals with the intercalation of procainamide hydrochloride (PA), an antiarrythmia drug in montmorillonite (MMT), as a new drug delivery device. Optimum intercalation of PA molecules within the interlayer space of MMT was achieved by means of different reaction conditions. Intercalation of PA in the MMT galleries was conformed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR), and thermal analysis (DSC). In order to retard the quantity of drug release in the gastric environment, the prepared PA-MMT composite was compounded with alginate (AL), and further coated with chitosan (CS). The surface morphology of the PA-MMT-AL and PA-MMT-AL-CS nanocomposites beads was analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The in vitro release experiments revealed that AL and CS were able to retard the drug release in gastric environments, and release the drug in the intestinal environments with a controlled manner. The release profiles of PA from composites were best fitted in Higuchi kinetic model, and Korsmeyer-Peppas model suggested diffusion controlled release mechanism.

Cation-triggered drug release from a porous zinc-adeninate metal-organic framework.

A porous anionic metal-organic framework, bio-MOF-1, constructed using adenine as a biomolecular building block is described. The porosity of this material is evaluated, its stability in biological buffers is studied, and its potential as a material for controlled drug release is investigated. Specifically, procainamide HCl is loaded into the pores of bio-MOF-1 using a simple cation exchange process. Exogenous cations from biological buffers are shown to affect the release of the adsorbed drug molecules.

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus.

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is defined as a lupus-like syndrome temporally related to continuous drug exposure which resolves after discontinuation of the offending drug. There are currently no standard diagnostic criteria for DILE and the pathomechanisms are still unclear. Similarly to idiopathic lupus, DILE can be diveded into systemic (SLE), subacute cutaneous (SCLE) and chronic cutaneous lupus (CCLE). Systemic DILE is characterized by typical lupus-like symptoms including skin signs, usually mild systemic involvement and a typical laboratory profile with positive antinuclear and anti-histone antibodies, while anti-double strand (ds) DNA and anti-extractable nuclear antigens antibodies are rare. High risk drugs include hydralazine, procainamide and isoniazid. Drug-induced SCLE is very similar to idiopathic SCLE in terms of clinical and serologic characteristic, and it is more common than the systemic form of DILE. Drugs associated with SCLE include calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, interferons, thiazide diuretics and terbinafine. Drug-induced CCLE is very rarely reported in the literature and usually refers to fluorouracile agents or non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Recently, cases of DILE have been reported with anti-TNFalpha agents. These cases present with disparate clinical features including arthritis/arthralgia, skin rash, serositis, cytopenia and variable laboratory abnormalities. DILE to anti-TNFalpha agents differs in several ways to classic DILE. The incidence of rashes is higher compared to classical systemic DILE. In most cases of classic DILE visceral involvement is rare, whereas several cases of anti-TNFalpha DILE with evidence of renal disease have been reported. Low serum complement levels as well as anti-extractable nuclear antigen antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies are rarely present in classic DILE, whereas they are reported in half the cases of anti-TNFalpha DILE; in contrast, anti-histone antibodies are described in classic DILE more often than in anti-TNFalpha DILE. Recognition of DILE in patients receiving anti-TNFalpha therapy can be difficult due to the symptoms of their underlying disease. A temporal association (months to years) of the offending drug with characteristic or suggestive symptoms, and resolution of symptoms on drug withdrawal is the best evidence for this diagnosis of DILE.

Effects of procainamide and sotalol on restitution properties, dispersion of refractoriness, and ventricular fibrillation activation patterns in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Interest in combining antiarrhythmic drugs has been prompted by the lack of efficacy of monotherapies and the toxicity resulting from high doses of individual agents. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that procainamide and sotalol combined have greater beneficial effects on restitution, on the dispersion of refractoriness, and on decreasing the complexity of ventricular fibrillation (VF) than either drug alone. METHODS: Six open-chest pigs received intravenous procainamide (15 mg/kg load and 50 microg/kg/min maintenance) followed by sotalol (1.5 mg/kg). Another six pigs received sotalol first and procainamide second. Before drugs and after each drug, 20-second episodes of electrically induced VF were recorded from a 21 x 24 unipolar electrode plaque (2 mm spacing) sutured on the lateral posterior left ventricular epicardium. Restitution properties and dispersion of refractoriness were estimated from activation recovery intervals during pacing. RESULTS: The combination of the two drugs reduced the maximum slope of the restitution curve and during VF reduced the number of wavefronts, the activation rate, the percentage of wavefront families exhibiting reentry, and the conduction velocity more than either drug alone. In addition, in the group that received sotalol first, both drugs together reduced the SD and the coefficient of variation of the spatial dispersion of refractoriness compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Procainamide and sotalol combined have greater beneficial effects on restitution properties, dispersion of refractoriness, and the complexity of VF than either drug alone compared with baseline.

Emergency department use of intravenous procainamide for patients with acute atrial fibrillation or flutter.

OBJECTIVES: Acute atrial fibrillation and flutter are very common arrhythmias seen in emergency department (ED) patients, but there is no consensus for their optimal management. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) procainamide for acute atrial fibrillation or flutter. METHODS: This health records review included a consecutive cohort of ED patients with acute-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter who received IV procainamide at one university hospital ED during a five-year period. The standard clinical protocol involved IV infusion of 1 g of procainamide over 60 minutes, followed by electrical cardioversion if necessary. A trained observer extracted data from the original clinical records. Outcome measurements included conversion to sinus rhythm, adverse events, and relapse up to seven days. RESULTS: The 341 study patients had a mean age of 63.9 years (SD +/- 15.5 years), and 56.6% were male. The conversion rates were 52.2% (95% confidence interval = 47% to 58%) for 316 atrial fibrillation cases and 28.0% (95% confidence interval = 13% to 46%) for 25 atrial flutter cases. Mean dose given was 860.7 mg (SD +/- 231.2 mg), and median time to conversion was 55 minutes. Adverse events occurred in 34 cases (10.0%): hypotension, 8.5%; bradycardia, 0.6%; atrioventricular block, 0.6%; and ventricular tachycardia, 0.3%. There were no cases of torsades de pointes, cerebrovascular accident, or death. Most patients (94.4%) were discharged home, but 2.9% of patients returned with a recurrence of atrial fibrillation within seven days. CONCLUSIONS: This study of acute atrial fibrillation or flutter patients treated in the ED with IV procainamide suggests that this treatment is safe and effective in this setting. Procainamide should be prospectively compared with other ED strategies.

Comparative study of intravenous amiodarone and procainamide in the treatment of atrial fibrillation of recent onset.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of amiodarone and procainamide in the acute cardiology setting. METHODS: The study population consisted of 223 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). After administration of digoxin for ventricular rate control, all patients who failed to restore sinus rhythm (SR) were randomized into 2 groups: group A (113 patients) were administered 300 mg amiodarone intravenously over 30 min and, in case of failure to restore SR, amiodarone of 20 mg/kg/24 h was administered intravenously. Group B (110 patients) were intravenously administered a bolus dose of 1 gm procainamide, at an infusion rate 50/mg/min, and, in case of failure to restore SR, 2 mg/min for the next 24 h. RESULTS: The rate of cardioversion to SR was similar between amiodarone (81.4%) and procainamide (82.7%) (P=NS). Procainamide loading recorded faster cardioversion times than amiodarone loading (P=0.02), but there was no significant difference after that. Amiodarone caused a significant decrease on systolic blood pressure compared to procainamide for the first 18 h (P<0.001), and a significant decrease in the diastolic blood pressure for the first 6 h (P<0.001). Side-effects for either medication were sparse. The only real prognostic factor for successful cardioversion remains the size of left atrium. CONCLUSION: Both drugs were equally effective in restoring SR, though procainamide acts quicker in the loading phase. Both medications are safe and side effects develop only in the maintenance phase.