Outpatient surgery is the solution at hand for reducing costs and hospital stays for pediatric surgery too: a hospital trial.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient management has proven to be the most useful method of treatment for various minimally complex surgical specialties compared to day-hospital management or ordinary inpatient processes, a fact confirmed by numerous technical documents and works in the literature. METHODS: We analyzed 27,713 surgical interventions carried out in our hospital between 2005 and 2017. This analysis included all interventions for which the indication of the level of care has moved, over the years, to an outpatient setting. We evaluated the direct costs of these services, comparing them by year and by treatment setting. RESULTS: From the analysis of costs in general, for the same number of services, a reduction of 56.6% can be seen in the comparison between 2005 and 2017. In addition, the analysis of the length of stay shows an average reduction in the number of days of hospitalization from 2.9 to 1.2 between 2005 and 2017. On the basis of a large quantity of data, our study confirms that outpatient surgery can have a significant impact in reducing costs and days of hospitalization, even in a pediatric setting, demonstrating that it is the best choice in terms of saving resources and, above all, clinical and organizational appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient surgery is in fact a valuable solution that provides an advantage for both the patient and his/her family, especially in the pediatric field, for the hospital and more generally for the health system as a whole.

Elective ambulatory surgical care in Ireland-why it needs to be better coded, classified and managed.

BACKGROUND: In the year to July 2017, surgical disciplines accounted for 73% of the total national inpatient and day case waiting list and, of these, day cases accounted for 72%. Their proper classification is therefore important so that patients can be managed and treated in the most suitable and efficient setting. AIMS: We set out to sub-classify the different elective surgical day cases treated in Irish public hospitals in order to assess their need to be managed as day cases and the consistency of practice between hospitals. METHODS: We analysed all elective day cases that came under the care of surgeons between January 2014 and December 2016 and sub-classified them into those that were (A) true day case surgical procedures; (B) minor surgery or outpatient procedures; (C) gastrointestinal endoscopies; (D) day case, non-surgical interventions and (E) unclassified or having no primary procedure identified. RESULTS: Of 813,236 day case surgical interventions performed over 3 years, 26% were adjudged to accord with group A, 41% with B, 23% with C, 5% with D and 5% with E. The ratio of A to B procedures did not vary significantly across the range of hospital types. However, there were some notable variations in coding and practices between hospitals. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that many day cases should have been performed as outpatient procedures and that there were variations in coding and practices between hospitals that could not be easily explained. Outpatient procedure coding and a better, more consistent, classification of day cases are both required to better manage this group of patients.

Laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract: a clarification of nomenclature. A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society.

Acronyms and abbreviations are frequently used in otorhinolaryngology and other medical specialties. CO2 laser-assisted transoral surgery of the pharynx, the larynx and the upper airway is a family of commonly performed surgical procedures termed transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). The abbreviation TLM can be confusing because of alternative modes of delivery. Classification and definition of the different types of procedures, performed transorally or transnasally, are proposed by the Working Committee for Nomenclature of the European Laryngological Society, emphasizing the type of laser used and the way this laser is transmitted. What is usually called TLM, would more clearly be defined as CO2 laser transoral microsurgery or CO2 TOLMS or CO2 laser transoral surgery only (with a handpiece) would be defined as CO2 TOLS. KTP transnasal flexible laser surgery would be KTP TNFLS. Transoral use of the flexible CO2 wave-guide with a handpiece would be a CO2 TOFLS. One can argue that these clarifications are not necessary and that the abbreviation TLM for transoral laser microsurgery is more than sufficient. But this is not the case. Laser surgery, office-based laser surgery and microsurgery are frequently and erroneously interchanged for one another. These classifications allow for a clear understanding of what was performed and what the results meant.

Definitional Differences of 'Outpatient' Versus 'Inpatient' THA and TKA Can Affect Study Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There has been great interest in performing outpatient THA and TKA. Studies have compared such procedures done as outpatients versus inpatients. However, stated "outpatient" status as defined by large national databases such as the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) may not be a consistent entity, and the actual lengths of stay of those patients categorized as outpatients in NSQIP have not been specifically ascertained and may in fact include some patients who are "observed" for one or more nights. Current regulations in the United States allow these "observed" patients to stay more than one night at the hospital under observation status despite being coded as outpatients. Determining the degree to which this is the case, and what, exactly, "outpatient" means in the NSQIP, may influence the way clinicians read studies from that source and the way hospital systems and policymakers use those data. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to utilize the NSQIP database to characterize the differences in definition of "inpatient" and "outpatient" (stated status versus actual length of stay [LOS], measured in days) for THA and TKA; and (2) to study the effect of defining populations using different definitions. METHODS: Patients who underwent THA and TKA in the 2005 to 2014 NSQIP database were identified. Outpatient procedures were defined as either hospital LOS = 0 days in NSQIP or being termed "outpatient" by the hospital. The actual hospital LOS of "outpatients" was characterized. "Outpatients" were considered to have stayed overnight if they had a LOS of 1 day or longer. The effects of the different definitions on 30-day outcomes were evaluated using multivariate analysis while controlling for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 72,651 patients undergoing THA, 529 were identified as "outpatients" but only 63 of these (12%) had a LOS = 0. Of 117,454 patients undergoing TKA, 890 were identified as "outpatients" but only 95 of these (11%) had a LOS = 0. After controlling for potential confounding factors such as gender, body mass index, functional status before surgery, comorbidities, and smoking status, we found "inpatient" THA to be associated with increased risk of any adverse event (relative risk, 2.643, p = 0.002), serious adverse event (relative risk, 2.455, p = 0.011), and readmission (relative risk, 2.775, p = 0.010) compared with "outpatient" THA. However, for the same procedure and controlling for the same factors, patients who had LOS > 0 were not associated with any increased risk compared with patients who had LOS = 0. A similar trend was also found in the TKA cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Future THA, TKA, or other investigations on this topic should consistently quantify the term "outpatient" because different definitions, stated status or actual LOS, may lead to different assignments of risk factors for postoperative complications. Accurate data regarding risk factors for complications after total joint arthroplasty are crucial for efforts to reduce length of hospital stay and minimize complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The role of a paediatric day surgery unit at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow between 1993 and 2006.

A retrospective analysis was carried out on all day surgery admissions at Glasgow's Royal Hospital for Sick Children between 1993 and 2006. The aim of the study was to analyse the total number of operations per day, month and year; specialties involved; and age range of the children admitted, to examine how these factors changed over the 13-year study period. We also studied the specific operations performed in 2006 by each specialty.

Does procedure profitability impact whether an outpatient surgery is performed at an ambulatory surgery center or hospital?

Ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are small (typically physician owned) healthcare facilities that specialize in performing outpatient surgeries and therefore compete against hospitals for patients. Physicians who own ASCs could treat their most profitable patients at their ASCs and less profitable patients at hospitals. This paper asks if the profitability of an outpatient surgery impacts where a physician performs the surgery. Using a sample of Medicare patients from the National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery, we find that higher profit surgeries do have a higher probability of being performed at an ASC compared to a hospital. After controlling for surgery type, a 10% increase in a surgery's profitability is associated with a 1.2 to 1.4 percentage point increase in the probability the surgery is performed at an ASC.

Patients "falling through the cracks". The Canterbury Charity Hospital: initial progress report.

AIM: To present the early experience of establishing a community-funded and volunteer-staffed hospital in Christchurch, New Zealand. This was to provide free selected elective healthcare services to patients in the Canterbury region who were otherwise unable to access treatment in the public health system or afford private healthcare. METHODS: Data were reviewed relating to the establishment, financing, staffing and running of the Canterbury Charity Hospital. Details were provided of patients referred by their general practitioners who were seen and treated during the first two and a half years of function. RESULTS: Canterbury Charity Hospital Trust, established in 2004, completed the purchase of a residential villa in 2005 and converted it into the Canterbury Charity Hospital, which performed its first operations in 2007. By the end of December 2009, 115 volunteer health professionals and 79 non-medical volunteers had worked at the Hospital, provided a total of 966 outpatient clinic appointments, of which 609 were initial assessments, and performed 610 surgical procedures. Funding of $NZ4.3 million (end of last financial year) came from fundraising events, donations, grants and interest from investments. There has been no government funding. CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial unmet need for elective healthcare in Canterbury, and this has, in part, been addressed by the recently established Canterbury Charity Hospital. The overwhelming community response we have experienced in Canterbury raises the question of whether the current public health system needs attention to be re-focused on unmet need. We contend that unless this occurs it might be necessary to establish charity-type hospitals elsewhere throughout the country.

Is there a relationship between physician and facility volumes of ambulatory procedures and patient outcomes?

This study explores associations between patient outcomes (7- and 30-day hospitalization and mortality) and healthcare provider (physician and facility) volumes of outpatient colonoscopy, cataract removal, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed in outpatient surgical settings in Florida. Findings indicate that patients treated by high-volume physicians or facilities had lower adjusted odds ratios for hospitalizations and mortality. When physician and facility volume were assessed simultaneously, physician volume accounted for larger effects than facility volume in hospitalization models. When assessing both physician and facility volume together for mortality, facility volume was a stronger predictor of mortality outcomes at 30 days. Further examinations of associations of outpatient physician and facility volumes and patient outcomes are suggested.

The use of ambulatory patient groups for regulation of hospital ambulatory surgery revenue in Maryland.

The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC or the commission) is a government agency with the authority to establish rates for both inpatient and outpatient services for all general acute care hospitals in the state. By law and consistent with the state's unique Medicare waiver, all payers (including Medicare and Medicaid) must pay hospitals on the basis of these rates. The HSCRC has used diagnosis related groups to set case-mix-adjusted limits on the revenue per discharge for inpatient services (similar to Medicare inpatient prospective payment nationally) yet, the Maryland rate-setting system for outpatient services has not embodied incentives to control utilization of services. Beginning in the state's fiscal year 2008, the HSCRC is implementing regulation of ambulatory surgery services using ambulatory patient groups to provide better incentives to control utilization, and to facilitate comparisons of the case-mix-adjusted charges per ambulatory surgery case across hospitals. Maryland has been an innovator in the design and successful implementation of payment systems and other incentive mechanisms to constrain hospital cost, maintain payment equity, and ensure access to needed hospital care. The HSCRC's adoption of all patient refined diagnosis related groups and the hospital-specific relative value method for establishing diagnosis related group weights in 2005 was relevant to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' decision to move to Medicare severity diagnosis related groups beginning in federal fiscal year 2008, and to consider the use of hospital-specific relative value weights. The HSCRC's decision to use ambulatory patient groups for ambulatory surgery is an attempt to apply the most effective features of inpatient payment systems, prospective payment, including incentives to control service volumes. As such, it represents a radical departure from prevailing payment arrangements in that it seeks to remove the traditional distinction between inpatient and outpatient surgical services, a distinction that has blocked the development of effective and well-integrated outpatient payment systems for decades. This article describes the policy rationale for this system, the analysis that was performed, and the methods that will be used to control the revenue per case and compare the relative charges of the hospitals.

A methodology to estimate the potential to move inpatient to one day surgery.

BACKGROUND: The proportion of surgery performed as a day case varies greatly between countries. Low rates suggest a large growth potential in many countries. Measuring the potential development of one day surgery should be grounded on a comprehensive list of eligible procedures, based on a priori criteria, independent of local practices. We propose an algorithmic method, using only routinely available hospital data to identify surgical hospitalizations that could have been performed as one day treatment. METHODS: Moving inpatient surgery to one day surgery was considered feasible if at least one surgical intervention was eligible for one day surgery and if none of the following criteria were present: intervention or affection requiring an inpatient stay, patient transferred or died, and length of stay greater than four days. The eligibility of a procedure to be treated as a day case was mainly established on three a priori criteria: surgical access (endoscopic or not), the invasiveness of the procedure and the size of the operated organ. Few overrides of these criteria occurred when procedures were associated with risk of immediate complications, slow physiological recovery or pain treatment requiring hospital infrastructure. The algorithm was applied to a random sample of one million inpatient US stays and more than 600 thousand Swiss inpatient stays, in the year 2002. RESULTS: The validity of our method was demonstrated by the few discrepancies between the a priori criteria based list of eligible procedures, and a state list used for reimbursement purposes, the low proportion of hospitalizations eligible for one day care found in the US sample (4.9 versus 19.4% in the Swiss sample), and the distribution of the elective procedures found eligible in Swiss hospitals, well supported by the literature. There were large variations of the proportion of candidates for one day surgery among elective surgical hospitalizations between Swiss hospitals (3 to 45.3%). CONCLUSION: The proposed approach allows the monitoring of the proportion of inpatient stay candidates for one day surgery. It could be used for infrastructure planning, resources negotiation and the surveillance of appropriate resource utilization.

[Ambulatory anesthesia in Catalonia, Spain]. / Anestesia ambulatoria en Cataluña.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this arm of the ANESCAT study was to describe the characteristics of ambulatory anesthesia in Catalonia, Spain. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Relevant data was extracted from a survey of anesthetic procedures in 131 public, publicly contracted, and private hospitals on 14 representative days in 2003. RESULTS: Of the estimated 603,189 anesthesias performed, 206,992 (34.32%; 95% confidence interval, 33.3%-35.4%) were on outpatients. The median (10th to 90th percentile) age of patients was 59 (22-80) years and 56.6% were women. The physical status of patients according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was ASA I or II for 75.1% of the patient sample. The most common approach to anesthesia was sedation/monitoring (47.7%), followed by regional anesthesia (28.9%). The types of regional anesthesia reported most often were peri- or retrobulbar blocks (50.8% of the regional blocks), followed by spinal anesthesia (22.2%). Anesthesia was required for surgery in 76.5% of the cases and for diagnostic or other nonsurgical procedures in 22%. The individual surgical specialties creating the greatest demand for anesthetic procedures were ophthalmology (39%) and orthopedic and trauma surgery (10.9%). The specific interventions accounting for the largest percentages of anesthetic procedures were cataract extraction (32.3%) and digestive tract endoscopy (16.7%). In 8.2% of the cases, patients did not require a stay in the postanesthetic recovery unit. Private hospitals, facilities with fewer than 250 beds, and those not accredited to provide medical resident training had higher rates of ambulatory anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory procedures account for approximately a third of the anesthesia workload in Catalonia. Sedation/monitoring and regional anesthesia are the approaches that predominate in this category. Ambulatory anesthesia is applied mainly in ophthalmology and the rate of endoscopic procedures requiring outpatient anesthesia is also high.