Prognostic significance of the preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma treated with curative surgery and adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prognostic value of the preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OC-SCC) treated with curative surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with OC-SCC who received surgery and postoperative adjuvant RT/CCRT between January 2005 and December 2012. Blood samples were drawn in the 2 weeks preceding surgery. SII was calculated by multiplying the absolute neutrophil and platelet counts, and then, divided by the absolute lymphocyte count, and its optimal cutoff value was identified using the Youden's index. The study endpoints included overall survival (OS), local control (LC), regional control (RC), and distant control (DC). RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 993 patients (58.8% of them treated with CCRT). The optimal cutoff value for SII was 810.6. A total of 347 (34.9%) study participants had high preoperative SII values. After allowance for potential confounders in multivariable analysis, high SII values were independently associated with less favorable DC (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.683, p = 0.001) and OS (adjusted HR = 1.466, p < 0.001). No independent association between SII and LC/RC was observed. CONCLUSION: Increased SII values predict poor DC and OS in patients with OC-SCC treated with curative resection and adjuvant RT/CCRT. Owing to the higher risk of systemic failure in this patient group, a thorough follow-up surveillance schedule may be advisable pending independent confirmation of our data.

Salivary gland carcinoma (SGC) with perineural spread and/or positive resection margin - high locoregional control rates after photon (chemo) radiotherapy - experience from a monocentric analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the outcome, especially locoregional control of patients with locally advanced salivary gland carcinoma (SGC) with perineural spread (Pn1) and/or positive resection margins (R1/2) after postoperative photon (chemo) radiotherapy in a single centre. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 65 patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced SGC without distant metastases who underwent radio (chemo) therapy in the department of radiation oncology of the university hospital of Erlangen from January 2000 until April 2017. Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate survival and recurrence rates. In univariate analysis the log-rank test was used to correlate patient-/tumor- and treatment-related parameters to survival and recurrence rates. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 45 months (range: 6; 215). After 1, 3, 5 years cumulative incidence of local and locoregional failure was 3.1, 7.0, 7.0% and 3.1, 9.7, 12.9%, whereas cumulative incidence of distant metastases (DM) was 15.6, 36.0, 44.0%. After 1,3, 5 years cumulative Overall (OS) and Disease-free survival (DFS) was 90.5, 74.9, 63.9% and 83.0, 54.8, 49.4%. The only significant predictor for decreased local and locoregional control was a macroscopic resection margin(R2) (p = 0.002 and p = 0.04). High-grade histology (p = 0.006), lymph node metastases with extracapsular spread (p = 0.044) and an advanced T-stage (p = 0.031) were associated with an increased rate of DM. High-grade histology was the only factor predicting for a decreased DFS (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Photon radiotherapy leads to high local and locoregional control rates in a high-risk patient population with SGC with microscopically positive resection margins and/or perineural spread. The most common site of disease recurrence was distant metastases. Therefore the real challenge for the future should be to prevent distant metastases.

Polymorphous Low-Grade Adenocarcinoma: A Proposed Reconstruction Protocol Based on Past Surgical Experience.

BACKGROUND: To propose a reconstructive protocol based on surgical management experience of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA) and the location of the primary lesion. METHODS: Data on the surgical management and the reconstructive technique of 14 histologically conformed patients with PLGA, all treated by the same surgeon, were analyzed and evaluated. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period in our series was 6.2 years. Mean age at diagnosis was 55.5 years and female to male ratio was 2.2:1. The most common presenting sign was a nonpainful lump or mass in an intraoral location. Most patients were managed by wide local excision and reconstruction method varied from primary closure to the use of radial forearm graft. Recurrence appeared in one of the patients in this series, while 2 required further radiation therapy. A protocol for reconstruction of intraoral patients with PLGA is suggested based on our analysis. CONCLUSION: Surgical management is the gold standard for PLGA treatment. Neck dissection is recommended only in patients with presurgery fine-needle aspiration confirmed lymph node involvement. The reconstruction depends mainly on location and size of the primary lesion.

Risk Factors for Overall Survival Outcome in Surgically Treated Human Papillomavirus-Negative and Positive Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study reports the oncological outcome of a non-selected series of patients with human papillomavirus(HPV)-positive and -negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) preferentially managed with upfront surgery. METHODS: Consecutive OSCC cases (n = 378) diagnosed from 2000 to 2010 in our department were evaluated for risk factors, HPV association, therapy and overall survival (OS). HPV status was determined by combined DNA and p16 testing, and treatment was defined as the first course of treatment with any kind of surgery (upfront surgery) or primary chemoradiotherapy. OS of HPV-associated and HPV-negative patients was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The majority of OSCC patients (215 of 361; 69.5%) received upfront surgery as first-line treatment in curative intent. The 5-year OS rate in patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors were 81.1 and 39.7%, respectively. Upfront surgery in HPV-negative (p < 0.001) and HPV-positive patients (p = 0.05) resulted in improved OS only in advanced stages. Multivariate analysis for patients revealed age in HPV-associated OSCC as an independent predictor for improved survival, and age, performance, N status and therapy as independent predictors in HPV-negative OSCC. CONCLUSIONS: Non-selected OSCC patients amenable to curative therapy show poor 5-year OS. The benefit of upfront surgery remains unclear. A younger patient age was the main factor for a better outcome in patients with HPV-associated OSCC.

Transoral Surgery or Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma - Is It Either Or ?

The management of oropharyngeal carcinoma represents an increasing clinical challenge, because of its rising incidence, particularly in younger patients as a result of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and because significant technological advances have occurred in radiotherapy and surgery over the last 10 years that have increased treatment options for patients, with little robust evidence yet of their relative merits. As a result, there is a lack of clinical consensus on the optimum treatment modality, reflected in wide variation in practice between different cancer networks across the UK. Here, we consider the evidence base for minimally invasive transoral surgery and for intensity-modulated radiotherapy-based primary treatment for oropharyngeal cancer, in terms of both oncological and functional outcomes. Management strategies for HPV-positive and HPV-negative disease, and for different stages of the disease, are considered. There is currently an unparalleled opportunity to shape the future management of oropharyngeal cancer, which is dependent on recruiting patients to ongoing clinical trials, in order to build an evidence base to support a clinical consensus on the optimal treatment strategies. It appears likely that future evidence-based decision-making will use both primary radiotherapy and primary surgical treatment modalities to maximise patient benefit.

Risk Factors Associated with Disease Recurrence in Patients with Stage III/IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Treated with Surgery and Postoperative Radiotherapy.

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to identify variables associated with high risk of failure in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (SCC-OC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 191 patients with stage III-IVb SCC-OC treated with post-operative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between 1995 and 2013. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed; variables associated with inferior DFS were identified. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (39%) recurred. DFS and five-year OS were 52% and 54%, respectively. Poorly differentiated tumors (p=0.03), recurrent tumors (p=0.02) and high nodal ratio (p=0.02) were associated with an increased risk of recurrence. CRT was associated with improved DFS in patients with positive margins and/or extracapsular extension (p=0.021). CONCLUSION: Tumors that are recurrent, high grade, or have high nodal ratio are at risk of recurrence. Presence of these disease features should be taken into consideration for better risk stratification.

Positive surgical margins in early stage oral cavity cancer: an analysis of 20,602 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence of positive surgical margins in early oral cavity cancer and identify patient, tumor, and system factors associated with their occurrence. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I or II oral cavity squamous cell cancer between 1998 and 2011 were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with positive margins were conducted. RESULTS: In total, 20,602 patients with early oral cancer were identified. Margin status was reported in 94.8% of cases, and positive margins occurred in 7.5% of those cases. Incidence of positive margins by institution varied from 0% to 43.8%, with median incidence of 7.1%. Positive margins were associated with clinical factors including stage II disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-1.98), intermediate grade (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37), high grade (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.39-2.03), and floor of mouth (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.52-2.08), buccal mucosa (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.59-2.68), and retromolar locations (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.85-3.11). Positive margins were also associated with treatment at nonacademic cancer centers (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.44) and institutions with a low oral cancer case volume (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.23-1.69). CONCLUSION: Positive margins are associated with tumor factors, including stage, grade, and site, reflecting disease aggressiveness and difficulty of resection. Positive margins also are associated with factors such as treatment facility type, hospital case volume, and geographic region, suggesting potential variation in quality of care. Margin status may be a useful quality measure for early oral cavity cancer.

Postoperative radiotherapy in patients with salivary duct carcinoma: clinical outcomes and prognostic factors.

This study sought to investigate the clinical outcome and the role of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) who had undergone surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of 25 SDC patients treated between 1998 and 2011 with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. The median prescribed dose was 60 Gy (range, 49.5-61.4 Gy). The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the tumor bed in four patients, the tumor bed and ipsilateral neck in 14 patients, and the tumor bed and bilateral neck in six patients. Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic variables were analyzed with the log-rank test. The 5-year LC, DFS and OS were 67%, 45% and 47%, respectively. Disease recurrence was found in 12 patients: seven as local, four as regional and eight as distant failure. Perineural and lymphovascular invasion was a significant prognostic factor for LC (P = 0.03). Local failure was common, and the presence of local recurrence significantly affected the OS (P < 0.05). We conclude that surgery and postoperative radiotherapy is expected to decrease the risk of local failure and contribute to good prognoses for patients with SDC. It might be advisable to have the CTV include the cranial nerves involved and the corresponding parts of the skull base in cases of pathologically positive perineural invasion.

The diagnosis and treatment of oral cavity cancer.

BACKGROUND: About 10,000 persons are diagnosed as having carcinoma of the oral cavity or the throat in Germany every year. Squamous-cell carcinoma accounts for 95% of cases. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the pertinent literature on predefined key questions about these tumors (which were agreed upon by a consensus of the investigators), concerning imaging, the removal of cervical lymph nodes, and resection of the primary tumor. RESULTS: 246 clinical trials were selected for review on the basis of 3014 abstracts. There was only one randomized, controlled trial (evidence level 1-); the remaining trials reached evidence levels 2++ to 3. Patients with mucosal changes of an unclear nature persisting for more than two weeks should be examined by a specialist without delay. The diagnosis is made by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging along with biopsy and a standardized histopathological examination. Occult metastases are present in 20% to 40% of cases. Advanced disease (stages T3 and T4) should be treated by surgery followed by radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. 20% of the patients overall go on to have a recurrence, usually within 2 to 3 years of the initial treatment. The 5-year survival rate is somewhat above 50%. Depending on the radicality of surgery and radiotherapy, there may be functional deficits, osteoradionecrosis, and xerostomia. The rate of loss of implants in irradiated bone is about 10% in 3 years. CONCLUSION: The interdisciplinary planning and implementation of treatment, based on the patient's individual constellation of findings and personal wishes, are prerequisites for therapeutic success. Reconstructive measures, particularly microsurgical ones, have proven their usefulness and are an established component of surgical treatment.

Floor of mouth carcinoma: surgery still the dominant mode of treatment.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the care and outcomes for patients presenting with floor of mouth (FOM) cancers. METHODS: In this Ethics-approved audit, all eligible patients were evaluated with eligibility defined as having a squamous cell carcinoma originating in the FOM. Patient, disease and treatment factors were defined. Primary end points were ultimate local/regional control and cancer-specific survival. These were analysed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance between survival curves. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were eligible for analysis, 76% males and 24% females, with 38 (24%) having a prior diagnosis of cancer. Surgery was performed in 126 patients (54 with pre/postoperative radiotherapy), radiotherapy only in 30 patients and chemotherapy only in 1 patient. Surgery had the best local control (85%), with 23/30 (77%) patients having radiotherapy failing locally. Ultimate regional control was achieved in 89% of patients, while new primaries occurred in 45 (29%) CONCLUSIONS: Surgery remains an essential component of the treatment of patients with FOM cancers, with a high likelihood of other cancers developing.

[Oral surgery as the patient's immediate cause of death]. / Kaakchirurgische behandelingen als oorzaak van overlijden.

The purpose of this study was to determine how often patients have died after treatment by an oral surgeon in the Netherlands. A review of the literature showed that this kind of complication has rarely been described in international literature. Subsequently, a small questionnaire was sent to 274 Dutch oral surgeons; 140 questionnaires were returned (51% response). The oral surgeons participating in the survey had had, on average, 21 years of work experience and 4.3% were women. Forty percent of the respondents confirmed that they had experienced the death of a patient after oral surgery. Most (18 patients) died after a dental extraction. The most important causes of death were post-operative spreading of an infection (15 patients), failing to survive oncology treatment (9 patients) and as the third cause of death, heart and/or lung failure was named (6 patients).

Utility of a generic risk prediction score in predicting outcomes after orofacial surgery for cancer.

Understanding how variations in individual patients and perioperative events alter risk is fundamental to a useful audit of outcome. Many surgical scoring systems have been developed to allow for case-mix adjustment when reporting outcome data. To our knowledge this is the first report of the use of the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity (POSSUM and P-POSSUM) by a maxillofacial unit. We audited 360 operations in 245 patients between 2005 and 2008. The POSSUM morbidity equation showed reasonable discrimination (C Statistic 0.74), as did the P-POSSUM mortality equation (C Statistic 0.75), but neither showed a significant degree of goodness-of-fit (morbidity p=0.0001; mortality p=0.019). Analysis of subgroups of all elective and major operations showed no improvement in the accuracy of scores used to identify risk of complications. The need for a standard of care index for the audit of mortality and morbidity in major head and neck surgery has not yet been met.

Anesthesia morbidity and mortality experience among Massachusetts oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

PURPOSE: To document the incidence of specific complications and the mortality rate for office anesthesia administered by fully qualified oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the state of Massachusetts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey questionnaire was mailed to the 169 active members of the Massachusetts Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Using a specific method for follow-up, a 100% response was obtained. RESULTS: The frequency of office anesthetic complications occurring in 2004 were consistent with our previous studies. There was 1 office death, for a mortality rate of 1/1,733,055. The incidence of other specific anesthetic-related complications is documented. CONCLUSION: From the data presented here, we conclude that outpatient anesthesia in the oral and maxillofacial surgery office continues to be a safe therapeutic modality.

Prognostic factors depicting disease-specific survival in parotid-gland tumors.

PURPOSE: To identify significant prognostic factors that can be used in clinical decision-making with regard to parotid cancer, which is characterized by a complex and diverse group of tumors with variable outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A historical cohort of 184 patients with parotid-gland malignancy, who had been registered in the Province of Manitoba from 1970 to 2003, was examined. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and a log-rank test for comparing subgroups. The independent effect of factors that predicted survival at the bivariate level was determined using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 62 years. The mean follow-up was 64 months. Absolute and disease-specific survival at 5 years was 41.70% and 57.94%, respectively. Survival for Stages I-IV at 5 years was 85.35%, 76.9%, 56.1%, and 8.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Factors with an independent effect on survival (p < 0.05) included age, tumor size, local invasion (Stages T4 vs. T1), and distant metastasis at presentation, tumor differentiation, and treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy vs. surgery alone reduced the risk of death from disease at 5 years by 50% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.228-0.995; p = 0.0486). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the variety of malignant parotid tumors, easily identifiable prognostic indicators such as advanced age, tumor size, local invasion, and tumor differentiation have a significant impact on outcome. Patients with adverse prognostic factors benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. The threshold for the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in managing parotid malignancy should be low.

Office surgery safety: the myths and truths behind the Florida moratoria--six years of Florida data.

BACKGROUND: Office-based surgery is an important method of health care delivery, and in 2000, the Florida Board of Medicine restricted office procedures. The objective of this study was to analyze the deaths resulting from office procedures in Florida. METHODS: The authors reviewed all office surgical incidents that resulted in death, injury, or hospital transfer in Florida from January of 2000 to January of 2006. Various methods were used to determine board status, office accreditation, and hospital privileges. RESULTS: In 6 years of Florida data, a total of 46 deaths related to office procedures were reported. Twenty of those were surgical procedures that are within the scope of plastic surgery, although non-board-certified plastic surgeons performed nine. Of those 20 related to plastic surgery, 11 died before discharge. Although all 11 survived long enough to be transferred to a hospital, we classified them as office deaths. The other nine died after appropriate discharge. Of the nine, seven deaths were from thromboembolism and the others from unknown causes. Thirty-five deaths were related to non-board-certified plastic surgeons and specialists in other fields. Board-certified plastic surgeons accounted for less than one-fourth of the deaths. There were no deaths from a board-certified plastic surgeon since April of 2004. CONCLUSIONS: There were over 600,000 operations during the study period. The fact that 11 office deaths were reported would suggest that the location in which these procedures were performed was not as much of a factor as the regulators have suggested. The most frequent cause of death after discharge was thromboembolism.