The evolution of surgical virtual education and telementoring: One surgeon's journey.

The first era of the global proliferation of surgical advancements involved surgical infection rate and technique breakthroughs by Lister, Halsted, and others. This was propagated by letters, academic papers, and international visits. While success was achieved, it was at a suboptimal pace. In the current era of minimally invasive surgical approaches, these methods are inadequate. This paper chronicles the development and application of virtual learning and telementoring as force multipliers to speed procedural adoption and proliferation.

Minimally-invasive tubular retraction ports for intracranial neurosurgery: History and future perspectives.

Brain retraction is a necessary yet potentially damaging requirement of accessing lesions located in deep structures. The development of minimally-invasive tubular retractors (MITRs) provides the theoretical advantage of maximizing visualization of and access to deep-seated lesions, all while minimizing collateral tissue damage. These advantages make MITRs preferable to traditional bladed retractors in the majority of deep-seated lesions. Several commercially-available MITR systems currently exist and have been shown to aid in achieving excellent outcomes with acceptable safety profiles. Nevertheless, important drawbacks to currently-available MITR systems exist. Continued pursuit of an ideal MITR system that provides maximal visualization and access to deep-seated lesions while minimizing retraction-related tissue damage is therefore important. In this review, we discuss the historical development of MITRs, the advantages of MITRs compared to traditional bladed retractors, and opportunities to improve the development of prospective MITRs.

The History of Neurosurgical Spinal Oncology: From Inception to Modern-Day Practices.

The neurosurgical management of spinal neoplasms has undergone immense development in parallel with advancements made in general spine surgery. Laminectomies were performed as the first surgical procedures used to treat spinal neoplasms. Since then, neurosurgical spinal oncology has started to incorporate techniques that have developed from recent advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurgery has also integrated radiotherapy into the treatment of spine tumors. In this historical vignette, we present a vast timeline spanning from the Byzantine period to the current day and recount the major advancements in the management of spinal neoplasms.

Five thousand years of minimal access surgery: 1850 to 1990: Technological developments.

This is the second of a three-part series that charts the history of minimal access surgery from antiquity to current times. Although rapid developments in laparoscopic and robotic surgery have transformed surgical care over the last 30 years, our predecessors made significant advances in their time which set the principles for modern practice. Part I of this series described how ancient medical practitioners developed simple instruments, from metal or wood, for viewing body cavities. Improvements in the use of metal, glass and lighting allowed for inspection of deeper parts of the body. This second part of the series will show how advances in electrical technology allowed the development of improved lighting for endoscopy and laparoscopy along with the use of electrocautery for a wide range of therapeutic procedures.

Five thousand years of minimal access surgery: 1990-present: organisational issues and the rise of the robots.

The last 30 years have seen a revolution in the provision of minimal access surgery for many conditions, and technological advances are increasing exponentially. Many instruments are superseded by improved versions before the NHS and publicly funded health services can offer widespread coverage. Although we tend to think of minimal access surgery as a modern concept, Parts I and II of this series have shown that there is a 5000-year history to this specialty and our predecessors laid down many principles which still apply today. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, minimal access surgery was driven forward by visionary individuals, often in the face of opposition from colleagues and the medical establishment. However, in the last 30 years, innovation has been driven more in partnerships between healthcare, scientific, financial, educational and charitable organisations. There are far too many individuals involved to detail every contribution here, but this third part of the series will concentrate on some of the important themes in the development of minimal access surgery to its current status.

Five thousand years of minimal access surgery: 3000BC to 1850: early instruments for viewing body cavities.

Surgeons and their patients recognise that one of the major advances in surgical technique over the last 20 years has been the growth of minimal access surgery by means of laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Partnerships with industry have facilitated the development of advanced technical instruments, light sources, recording devices and optics which are almost out of date by the time they are introduced to surgical practice. However, lest we think that technological innovation is entirely a modern concept, we should remember that our predecessors were masters of their craft and able to apply new technologies to surgical practice. The history of minimal access surgery can be traced back to approximately 5000 years ago and this review aims to remind us of the achievements of historical doctors and engineers, as well as bring more modern developments to wider attention.This review will comprise a three-part series:Part I 3000BC to 1850 Early instruments for viewing body cavitiesPart II 1850 to 1990 Technological developmentsPart III 1990 to present Organisational issues and the rise of the robots.

The First Pull-through Approach to a Tongue Tumor by Giorgio Regnoli in 1838.

The aim of this article is to describe the first report of a "pull-through" submental approach for excision of a tongue tumor, performed by Giorgio Regnoli in 1838 on a 14-year-old girl affected by a huge swelling of the tongue, which obstructed the upper airway and hindered swallowing and speech. Regnoli made a midline submental incision, divided the mylohyoid muscle and the oral mucosa, and entered the floor of the mouth. The tongue was pulled into the neck through the newly created opening, and the tumor was circumscribed by thread loops to prevent bleeding and was excised. Then the tongue stump was repositioned in the oral cavity. The skin margins were approximated by bandages. Despite limited armamentarium, the operation was successful. The described approach, subsequently named "pull-through," is still utilized nowadays for selected cases of tongue neoplasms when mandibular splitting is not required.

[A decade's review for the foundation, establishment and development of the Department of Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital].

Department of minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital (also named as Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV) was established on April 7, 2009. Up to now, ten years have passed since its foundation. As the first department built in specialized cancer hospital, which mainly focuses on laparoscopic surgery, its foundation and development has a very important historical and practical significance in the development of surgical oncology in China. Reviewing the rapid growth of the Department of Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery over the past decade, on the one hand, it has benefited from the opportunities of the times and the support of leaders in Peking University Cancer Hospital at that time. More importantly, the progress owes to the pioneering Professor Su Xiangqian, who is brave and innovative, with indomitable spirit and advanced management philosophy. With rigorous training, the ability of the team has been steadily enhanced, the competitiveness has been gradually improved, and the development direction which focuses on laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery and laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has been established. Now, the Department of Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery has become a well-known domestic gastrointestinal tumor center. In the past ten years, under the leadership of Professor Su Xiangqian, the growth of this team is innovative and comprehensive: (1) Introduce the internationally advanced Baldrige medical service management framework, and propose the "management by principle" concept to improve the core competitiveness of the department; (2) Establish an academic brand by laparoscopic standardized surgery training courses for gastrointestinal tumors, promote cooperation and exchange at home and abroad, and participate in international multi-center clinical research projects; (3) Adhere to the "formation of a research-oriented department, conducting clinical and basic research simultaneously" as the development direction; (4) Stick to the core development concept of team building and cultivate professional talents. Looking forward to the future, our team will not forget the beginning of the heart, and move forward! In the next ten years, we will break through ourselves and continue to pursue the higher level!

The History of Surgical Staplers: A Combination of Hungarian, Russian, and American Innovation.

Since their development in 1908, surgical staplers have been used as a method of "mechanical suturing" in efforts to divide hollow viscera and create anastomoses in an efficient and sterile manner. The concept for the surgical stapler was first developed by Humér Hultl, a Hungarian professor and surgeon, and designed by Victor Fischer, a Hungarian businessman and designer of surgical instruments. The design was highly acclaimed; however, it was bulky, cumbersome, and expensive to manufacture. In 1920, Aladár Petz, a student of Hultl, incorporated two innovations to the Fischer-Hultl stapler to create a more lightweight model, which was named the Petz clamp. In 1934, Friedrich of Ulm designed what would be the predecessor to the modern-day linear stapler. In the 1950s, Russian and American staplers began to emerge. Throughout the 1960s, a variety of stapling instruments were developed in the United States, manufactured by the United States Surgical Corporation. In the 1970s, Johnson & Johnson Ethicon brand joined the market. The United States Surgical Corporation was later bought by Tyco Healthcare and became Covidien in 2007. Through the collaboration of Felicien Steichen, Mark Ravitch, and Leon Hirsch, surgical staplers were further modified to incorporate interchangeable cartridges with various designs. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery began production of laparoscopic surgical staplers. Since its inception, the surgical stapler has provided a means to efficiently create safe and effective visceral and vascular anastomoses. The surgical stapler design continues to evolve while still maintaining the basic principles that were implemented in the original design.

Socio-historical evolution of the episiotomy practice: A literature review.

Episiotomy is an enlargement of the vaginal orifice made by a surgical incision of the perineum. This review aimed to provide a socio-historical retrospective on the practice or episiotomy. Using the criteria from the PRISMA guidelines, the authors conducted a literature review, browsing twenty databases and several papers available in the gray literature. Sixty-four articles, seven reports, and fifteen books were selected. Through this study, four eras with different approaches to episiotomy practice could be identified: 1792-1920, 1920-1980, 1980-1996, and 1996-2018. This review shows that institutionalization and medicalization of birth lead to a systematic practice of episiotomy in many westernized countries until 1996. Lay questioning and evidence-based medicine may have reversed this trend into a restrictive practice. After making an inventory of the factors associated with the evolution of change in the rate of episiotomies, the review finally revealed that evolution of the practice of episiotomy has also been influenced by ideological, political, and social factors.

History of Minimally Invasive Surgical Oncology.

Introduction of the fiberoptic light-source and CCD chip camera resulted in the rapid growth of minimally invasive surgical procedures. In surgical oncology, the change came slowly owing to concerns about adhering to oncological principals while learning to use new technology. Pioneers in minimally invasive colorectal surgery proved that minimally invasive resection for cancer was oncologically noninferior to traditional surgery. Early adopters treating esophageal and gastric cancer established that a minimally invasive approach was feasible with lower morbidity and equivalent oncologic outcomes. These results provide a basis for the extension of minimally invasive surgical techniques to other types of cancer surgery.

The History of and Controversy over Kambin's Triangle: A Historical Analysis of the Lumbar Transforaminal Corridor for Endoscopic and Surgical Approaches.

The transforaminal corridor in the lumbar spine allows access to the traversing and exiting nerve roots, the thecal sac, and the intervertebral disc space. Surgeons performing midline and minimally invasive approaches for lumbar interbody fusion access the disc space within the boundaries created by the exiting root of a segment and the traversing root after a complete facetectomy and removal of the pars interarticularis and lamina. Endoscopic surgeons and interventional pain management physicians approach the lumbar segment through a similar corridor, but with the bony anatomy intact. Although the boundaries of the corridor may seem the same, the angle of the trajectory and the bone work between the two differ. The overlap between these 2 distinct access corridors has led to an openhanded application of the term Kambin's triangle. Initially described for endoscopic approaches to the lumbar spine for microdiscectomy, this working triangle has been grafted into the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion literature. Given the similarities between these corridors, it is understandable how the lines of this nomenclature have blurred. The result has been an interchangeable application of the term Kambin's triangle for a variety of procedures in the spine literature. The objective of the current work is to add clarity to the various lumbar transforaminal corridors. The term Kambin's triangle should be limited to percutaneous access to the disc space for endoscopic procedures in the intact spine and should not be applied to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion after laminectomy and facetectomy. Instead, the term expanded transforaminal corridor should be applied.

Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functional multipurpose surgical robot. Currently, the most prominently available multipurpose robotic surgery system with US Food and Drug Administration approval is Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System, which is found in operating rooms across the globe. Although now ubiquitous for minimally invasive surgery, early surgical robot prototypes were specialty focused. Originally, multipurpose robotic systems were intended for long-distance trauma surgery in battlefield settings. While there were impressive feats of telesurgery, the marketable focus has veered from this goal. Initially developed through SRI International and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, surgical robotics reached private industry through two major competitors, who later merged. METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Clinical Key, EBSCO, Ovid, ProQuest, and industry manufacturers' websites yielded 62 relevant articles, of which 51 were evaluated in this review. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the literature and referred to primary sources by conducting interviews with present and historical leaders in the field to yield a detailed chronology of surgical robotics development. As minimally invasive robotic procedures are becoming the standard of care, it is crucial to comprehensively document their historical context and importance as an emerging and evolving discipline.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: Past and Present Implications for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma with Nodal Metastasis.

Although significant progress has been made in the understanding of melanoma pathophysiology and therapy, patients with metastatic melanoma still have a poor prognosis. The management of regional nodes remains a matter of debate. By replacing elective lymph node dissection, sentinel lymph node biopsy has revolutionized the treatment of malignant melanoma. In this paper, the history of the procedure is traced, and the indication for completion lymphadenectomy after positive sentinel node biopsy is discussed in light of the recent studies that addressed this issue. The role of adjuvant therapies in the management of patients with stage III melanoma is also discussed.