Aerosol Dispersion During Mastoidectomy and Custom Mitigation Strategies for Otologic Surgery in the COVID-19 Era.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate small-particle aerosolization from mastoidectomy relevant to potential viral transmission and to test source-control mitigation strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Cadaveric simulation. SETTING: Surgical simulation laboratory. METHODS: An optical particle size spectrometer was used to quantify 1- to 10-µm aerosols 30 cm from mastoid cortex drilling. Two barrier drapes were evaluated: OtoTent1, a drape sheet affixed to the microscope; OtoTent2, a custom-structured drape that enclosed the surgical field with specialized ports. RESULTS: Mastoid drilling without a barrier drape, with or without an aerosol-scavenging second suction, generated large amounts of 1- to 10-µm particulate. Drilling under OtoTent1 generated a high density of particles when compared with baseline environmental levels (P < .001, U = 107). By contrast, when drilling was conducted under OtoTent2, mean particle density remained at baseline. Adding a second suction inside OtoTent1 or OtoTent2 kept particle density at baseline levels. Significant aerosols were released upon removal of OtoTent1 or OtoTent2 despite a 60-second pause before drape removal after drilling (P < .001, U = 0, n = 10, 12; P < .001, U = 2, n = 12, 12, respectively). However, particle density did not increase above baseline when a second suction and a pause before removal were both employed. CONCLUSIONS: Mastoidectomy without a barrier, even when a second suction was added, generated substantial 1- to 10-µm aerosols. During drilling, large amounts of aerosols above baseline levels were detected with OtoTent1 but not OtoTent2. For both drapes, a second suction was an effective mitigation strategy during drilling. Last, the combination of a second suction and a pause before removal prevented aerosol escape during the removal of either drape.

A Commentary on Safety Precautions for Otologic Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

There are insufficient data regarding the safety of otologic procedures in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given the proclivity for respiratory pathogens to involve the middle ear and the significant aerosolization associated with many otologic procedures, safety precautions should follow current recommendations for procedures involving the upper airway. Until preoperative diagnostic testing becomes standardized and readily available, elective cases should be deferred and emergent/urgent cases should be treated as high risk for COVID-19 exposure. Necessary otologic procedures on positive, suspected, or unknown COVID-19 status patients should be performed using enhanced personal protective equipment, including an N95 respirator and eye protection or powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR, preferred), disposable cap, disposable gown, and gloves. Powered instrumentation should be avoided unless absolutely necessary, and if performed, PAPR or sealed eye protection is recommended.

Acquisition of basic ear surgery skills: a randomized comparison between endoscopic and microscopic techniques.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ear surgery is gaining increasing popularity and has an important impact on teaching middle ear anatomy and basic surgical skills among residents and fellows. Due to the wide-angled views offered, the approach significantly differs from the established microscopic technique. This randomized study compares the acquisition of basic ear-surgery skills using the endoscopic and microscopic technique under standardized conditions. We aim to investigate the required surgical times, attempts and accidental damages to surrounding structures (errors) in surgeons with different training levels. METHODS: Final-year medical students (n = 9), residents (n = 14) and consultants (n = 10) from the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland were enrolled in the present study. After randomization every participant had to complete a standard set of grasping and dissecting surgical tasks in a temporal bone model. After the first session the participants were crossed over to the other technique. RESULTS: Time required for completion of the surgical tasks was similar for both techniques, but highly dependent on the training status. A significant increase in the number of damages to the ossicular chain was observed with the microscopic as compared to the endoscopic technique (p < 0.001). Moreover, students beginning with the endoscopic technique showed an overall significantly lower amount of time to complete the tasks (p = 0.04). From the subjective feedback a preference towards the endoscopic technique mainly in medical students was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic approach is useful and beneficial for teaching basic surgical skills, mainly by providing a reduction of damage to surrounding tissues with similar operating times for both techniques. Moreover, medical students performed significantly faster, when first taught in the endoscopic technique. Especially for young surgeons without previous training in ear surgery, the endoscope should be considered to improve surgical skills in the middle ear.

Classifications of Mastoid and Middle Ear Surgery: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate existing classifications of surgical procedures of the middle ear and mastoid and find a suitable classification that could serve as an international standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scoping review with a systematic literature search using reference tracking and a syntax including all surgical procedures in mastoid and middle ear surgery and their synonyms. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Eleven reported classifications were included; six of which focused on middle ear surgery, two on mastoid surgery, and three on both. However, none of the classifications included all current surgical procedures of mastoid and middle ear surgery. CONCLUSION: Many classifications have been proposed for innumerable surgical techniques in middle ear and mastoid surgery. Some are outdated, some are incomplete, most are not widely accepted, and only few correspond with all current surgical techniques.

Comparison of Experts and Residents Performing a Complex Procedure in a Temporal Bone Surgery Simulator.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of automated metrics from a virtual reality (VR) temporal bone surgery simulator to determine how the performance of experts and trainees differs when performing a complex otological procedure (mastoidectomy with posterior tympanotomy and cochleostomy). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Using the University of Melbourne VR temporal bone surgery simulator, seven ENT consultants and seven ENT residents performed two trials of the surgical approach to cochlear implantation on a virtual temporal bone. Simulator recordings were used to calculate a range of automated metrics for each stage of the procedure, capturing efficiency, technique characteristics, drilled bone regions, and damage to vital anatomical structures. RESULTS: Results confirm that experts drilled more efficiently than residents. Experts generally used larger burrs and applied higher forces, resulting in faster material removal. However, they exercised more caution when drilling close to anatomical structures. Residents opened the temporal bone more widely, but neglected important steps in obtaining a clear view toward the round window, such as thinning the external ear canal wall and skeletonizing the medial aspect of the facial nerve. Residents used higher magnification and reoriented the temporal bone more often than experts. CONCLUSION: VR simulation provides metrics that allow the objective analysis of surgical technique, and identification of differences between the performance of surgical residents and their senior colleagues. The performance of residents could be improved with more guidance regarding how much force they should apply, what burr size they should use, how they should orient the bone, and for cochlear implant surgery guidance regarding anatomical regions requiring particular attention, to visualize the round window.

A simple standard technique for labyrinthectomy in the rat: A methodical communication with a detailed description of the surgical process.

Aims Labyrinthectomized rats are suitable models to test consequences of vestibular lesion and are widely used to study neural plasticity. We describe a combined microsurgical-chemical technique that can be routinely performed with minimum damage. Methods Caudal leaflet of the parotis is elevated. The tendinous fascia covering the bulla is opened frontally from the sternomastoid muscle's tendon while sparing facial nerve branches. A 4 mm diameter hole is drilled into the bulla's hind lower lateral wall to open the common (in rodents) mastoid-tympanic cavity. The cochlear crista (promontory) at the lower posterior part of its medial wall is identified as a bony prominence. A 1 mm diameter hole is drilled into its lower part. The perilymphatic/endolymphatic fluids with tissue debris of the Corti organ are suctioned. Ethanol is injected into the hole. Finally, 10 µL of sodium arsenite solution (50 µM/mL) is pumped into the labyrinth and left in place for 15 min. Simple closure in two layers (fascia and skin) is sufficient. Results and conclusion All rats had neurological symptoms specific for labyrinthectomy (muscle tone, body position, rotatory movements, nystagmus, central deafness). Otherwise, their behavior was unaffected, drinking and eating normally. After a few days, they learned to balance relying on visual and somatic stimuli (neuroplasticity).

Predicting Microsurgical Aptitude.

OBJECTIVE: Microscopic techniques are an essential part of otolaryngologic practice. These procedures demand advanced psychomotor and visuospatial skills, and trainees possess these abilities to varying degrees. No method currently exists to predict who will possess an aptitude for microscopic surgery. Our goal was to determine whether performance can be predicted by background experiences or skills. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic hospital. SUBJECTS: Students with no previous surgical experience. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were surveyed on a wide range characteristics thought to affect surgical aptitude, with a primary focus on video gaming and musical training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Subjects performed a microsurgical task using a novel simulator and their performance was assessed by blinded investigators. RESULTS: Forty-six students were assessed. There was no correlation between video gaming and improved microsurgical performance. Rather, video gamers obtained worse scores, although this difference did not reach significance. The majority of students played a musical instrument. Within this group, musicians who began playing at younger ages obtained higher scores, with the highest scores obtained by musicians who began playing before age 6. However, musicians did not obtain higher scores than non-musicians, regardless of their age of initiation. CONCLUSIONS: No improvement in microsurgical aptitude was seen in subjects who had a history of video gaming or musical instrument playing.

Identifying quality indicators of surgical training: A national survey.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Evidence shows a positive association between quality of surgical training received and patient outcomes. Traditionally, improved patient outcomes are linked with increased operative volume. However, generalizing this finding to surgeons in training is unclear. In addition, reduced exposure due to work-hour restrictions calls for alternative methods to determine the quality of training. The purpose of this study was to identify the indicators of high-quality training by surveying the trainees and trainers. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed based on input from faculty and previous studies. The survey was divided into three sections asking about the indicators of quality training, methods to measure them, and interventions for improvement. The questionnaire was administered to program directors (PDs) and senior residents of otolaryngology training programs nationwide. RESULTS: The strongest indicators of quality training that were agreed upon by both residents and PDs were having faculty development as an ideal trainer while having a balanced level of supervision and independence, logbooks for exposure to volume and variety of pathology, continuous evaluation and provision of feedback. However, structured teaching, simulation-based training, and trainee exam scores failed to reach an agreement as a metric of high-quality surgical training. CONCLUSION: Measuring quality of a residency training program is imperative to produce competent surgeons and ensuring patient safety. The results of this study will help the residency programs to better train their residents and improve the quality of their teaching. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

[Quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery: from bench to bedside]. / Qualitätssicherung nach rekonstruktiver Mittelohrchirurgie : Von der Studie zur Praxis.

BACKGROUND: The ongoing improvement of imaging quality nowadays focuses increasingly more on immediate quality evaluation of surgical measures. METHODS: Rotational tomography (RT) has been experimentally proven to be an alternative imaging technique to computed tomography (CT) in terms of quality and postoperative localization of middle ear implants in temporal bones. Based on these results imaging parameters were determined in the form of a surgical check list in order to systematically check individual but important surgical reconstructive steps. RESULTS: The positive benefit of RT concerning immediate and significant postoperative quality control was confirmed by a patient study. The surgical check list was successfully implemented under clinical framework requirements. Among these standardized parameters the determined angulation of inserted middle ear implants was given outstanding significance due to the predictive value concerning functional outcome. CONCLUSION: The RT procedure has been proven to be a reliable imaging tool for postoperative quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery.

Balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube: postoperative validation of patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: The Eustachian tube is responsible for ventilation, protection and drainage of the middle ear. Dysfunction of the Eustachian tube can lead to impairments ranging from inadequate pressure equalisation in the middle ear and pneumatised mastoid process to cholesteatoma. Conventional surgical interventions for chronic tube dysfunction have not brought resounding clinical success. However, the 'Bielefelder Balloon dilatation' constitutes a new and, judging from early results, very effective treatment for chronic tube dysfunction. Proof of the efficacy of the surgical procedures is provided by objective clinical factors, but for quality assurance, the assessment of the subjective quality of life of patients must also be taken into account. To measure health-related quality of life, standardised questionnaires are used which have been tested for reliability, validity and sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The patient survey was conducted retrospectively, and validation of patient satisfaction was carried out with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). RESULTS: GBI analysis revealed significant improvements in the total score as well as in general and physical health. CONCLUSIONS: The Bielefelder Balloon dilatation is a new and safe treatment for chronic tube dysfunction, which had a significant positive influence on the postoperative quality of life of our patient cohort.

[Estimation of the quality of medical aid in otosurgery].

The objective of the present work was to develop a system of assessment of the efficacy and quality of the surgical treatment of the patients presenting with chronic otitis media as a method for the improvement of surgical aid to the subjects with this condition. The system of evaluation of the quality of medical aid to the patients with chronic suppurative otitis media was based on the criteria for the assessment of the efficacy and quality of the surgical treatment by both the attending physician and the patient. The proposed method makes it possible to standardize the approaches to the estimation of the quality of medical aid, objectivate its characteristics, and carry out the comparative analysis of the efficacy and quality of the new methods for the surgical treatment of the patients with chronic suppurative otitis media.

Clinical guidelines and professional liability: a short comment from the legal side.

The paper explores the relationship between clinical guidelines and medical liability. In order to ascertain the standard of care required for example in ear surgery, courts rely on expert opinions and on existing clinical guidelines from medical societies. They assume that clinical guidelines express the reasonable standard of care that, when followed, insulates surgeons from liability. But judges keep the right to find that a set of clinical guidelines does not sufficiently protect the patient's health interests. If in contrast clinical guidelines are overly cautious (e.g. by requiring a scientifically questionable examination), there is no incentive stemming from the legal rules on medical liability to deter surgeons from following the guidelines. However, a growing concern about health costs may in the future influence professional behaviour as much as fear of a malpractice suit today.

Objective assessment of mastoidectomy skills in the operating room.

OBJECTIVE(S): To determine the feasibility and validity of an objective assessment tool designed to measure the development of mastoidectomy skills by resident trainees in the operating room. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal validation study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center and residency training program. SUBJECTS: Otolaryngology residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Technical performance as measured over time using Task-Based Checklist (TBC) and Global Rating Scale (GRS) developed for assessment of mastoidectomy skills. RESULTS: : Seventy pairs of evaluations were completed on 15 residents, showing strong correlation between both instruments (r = 0.93; p < 0.0001). Our instrument demonstrated construct validity for both TBC and GRS, showing higher scores with increasing surgical experience in otology. Both instruments showed high interitem reliability with Cronbach alpha coefficients of 0.98 and 0.95 for TBC and GRS, respectively. Regression analysis showed that thinning posterior external auditory canal (p < 0.05) and opening antrum to deepen dissection at sinodural angle (p < 0.05) were the strongest predictors of overall surgical performance. CONCLUSION: Our assessment tool is a feasible and valid method of evaluating acquisition of mastoidectomy skills in the operating room. It can be integrated into surgical teaching in the operating room and yields information for direct formative feedback.

Pilot testing of an assessment tool for competency in mastoidectomy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the feasibility, validity, and reliability of an evaluation tool for the assessment of competency in mastoid surgery. This study tests the hypothesis that residents of dissimilar training levels differ in their technical performance as measured by this tool. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. METHODS: Two or more faculty otolaryngologists evaluated each resident performing a cortical mastoidectomy on a cadaveric temporal bone. Performance was rated using global and checklist components of a mastoidectomy assessment tool. RESULTS: Fifteen internal and external faculty members evaluated 23 residents over 3 years resulting in 118 evaluations. Construct validity was observed as scores increased with clinical training year. These differences were greater for more complex tasks. There was a percentage agreement of 78.5% between evaluator pairs in the determination of pass (score 3-5) versus fail (score 1-2) for the checklist instrument, and an agreement of 74.4% for the global instrument. Although agreement was lower for the exact score on a scale of 1 to 5, differences of 1 or less occurred in over 80% of evaluator pairs. Regression analysis confirmed faculty perception that sharpening of the posterior external auditory canal cortex and opening of the antrum from posterior to anterior are strong predictors of overall surgical performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the tool we have developed is a feasible, valid, and reliable instrument for the assessment of competency in mastoidectomy. The instrument can be used to provide formative feedback and to identify procedural tasks for which additional training may be necessary.

Facial nerve decompression via middle fossa approach for hyperostosis cranialis interna: a feasible therapeutic approach.

UNLABELLED: Hyperostosis cranialis interna is an autosomal dominant disorder characterised by endosteal hyperostosis and osteosclerosis of the skull base and calvaria, leading to compression and dysfunction of cranial nerves I, II, VII and VIII. CASE REPORT: We report the use of bilateral surgical decompression of the internal auditory canals to treat hyperostosis cranialis interna in an eight-year-old girl presenting with bilateral facial palsy due to hyperostosis cranialis interna. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Using a middle fossa craniotomy approach, both internal auditory canals were unroofed and cranial nerves VII and VIII were decompressed, with a one-year interval between sides. The mimic function recovered. One year post-operatively, the right and left facial sides had been restored to House-Brackmann grades I and II, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of the use of surgical decompression of the internal auditory canal in a case of hyperostosis cranialis interna. Surgical decompression of the internal auditory canal is recommended therapeutically, but may also be performed prophylactically in younger patients with hyperostosis cranialis interna.

Canal wall cholesteatoma following canalplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Bony canalplasty is a common otological procedure performed to widen a narrow ear canal. The aim of this report is to describe two unusual patients who presented with a canal wall cholesteatoma many years after bony canalplasty. CASES: Two patients, aged 28 and 52 years, are presented. Both underwent canalplasty, 14 and 17 years before re-presenting with cholesteatoma evident through posterior canal wall defects. Both patients underwent exploration of the mastoid cavities and cartilage reconstruction of the canal walls. There was no recurrence at 24 and three month follow-up examinations (variously), hearing was preserved in both cases, and the patients suffered no early complications. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent long-term complication of canalplasty is re-stenosis of the external auditory canal. The importance of sealing any inadvertently opened mastoid air cells, in order to avoid the late complication reported, is emphasised.