Imported SARS-CoV-2 Variant P.1 in Traveler Returning from Brazil to Italy.

We report an imported case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant P.1 detected in an asymptomatic traveler who arrived in Italy on an indirect flight from Brazil. This case shows the risk for introduction of SARS-CoV-2 variants from indirect flights and the need for continued SARS-CoV-2 surveillance.

Impact of changes to national UK Guidance on testing for gestational diabetes screening during a pandemic: a single-centre observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the differences in detection rate for gestational diabetes (GDM) comparing the methodology recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) compared with testing described as appropriate during the Covid-19 pandemic by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). DESIGN: Cohort study of women delivering between 1 January 2016 and 1 July 2020. SETTING: London Teaching Hospital. POPULATION: All women delivering between 1 January 2016 and 13 May 2020 and follow up of women screening negative between 1 April 2020 and 13 May 2020. METHODS: Retrospective study of prospectively collected data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection rate of gestational diabetes. RESULTS: Using the RCOG guidance, the overall rate of women identified as having gestational diabetes fell from 7.7% (1853/24168) to 4.2% (35/831)(P = 0.0003). Of 230 women who tested negative according to the RCOG criteria from 1 April to 13 May but who subsequently had an oral glucose tolerance test, 47 (20.4%) were diagnosed as having gestational diabetes according to the NICE criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, the RCOG Covid-19 gestational diabetes screening regime failed to detect 47 of 82 (57%) women subsequently identified as gestational diabetics, and therefore cannot be recommended for general use. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Screening for GDM using RCOG Covid criteria reduced detection rates.

A Multisite Quality Improvement Initiative to Enhance the Adoption of Screening Practices for Intimate Partner Violence Into Routine Primary Care for Women Veterans.

OBJECTIVE: The Veterans Health Administration established comprehensive women's health clinics (CWHCs) to provide coordinated, high-quality primary care to women veterans. Intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent among women using these clinics. The Veterans Health Administration recommends screening women for IPV, yet screening uptake is low in CWHCs nationwide. We describe a multisite quality improvement initiative to enhance the adoption of IPV screening practices in the Veterans Health Administration's CWHCs. METHODS: This quality improvement initiative, implemented in 2017-2018, included 4 steps in which we (1) conducted a baseline survey of screening practices at CWHCs throughout the United States; (2) selected and tailored evidence-based implementation strategies based on identified barriers and facilitators; (3) deployed multicomponent implementation support, targeting low-adopting facilities; and (4) conducted a follow-up survey to evaluate changes in IPV screening practices from baseline (winter 2017) to 1-year follow-up (winter 2018) using quantitative and qualitative analyses. RESULTS: Responders from 62 CWHC sites provided information on IPV screening practices and barriers; 42 low-adopting sites were targeted for implementation support. At follow-up, responders provided information on IPV screening practices, perceived usefulness of implementation support strategies, and continued barriers. Among sites that responded to both surveys (n = 47), the number of sites that implemented recommended screening practices increased by 66.7%, from 15 at baseline to 25 at follow-up (P = .02). Emergent themes reflected barriers and facilitators for IPV screening implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in IPV screening practices in CWHCs is a pivotal step toward enhancing care for women. Yet, even with numerous implementation supports, barriers to adoption persist at many sites. Findings on modifiable barriers and unique facilitators can inform next steps for increasing screening uptake.

Economic evaluation of implementing a decentralised Hepatitis B virus diagnostic intervention under National Viral Hepatitis Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of decentralised diagnostic programme for hepatitis B virus (HBV) implemented in Tamil Nadu, South India with specific focus on a selected key population at increased risk of HBV. METHODS: A combination of decision tree and Markov model was developed to compare cost-effectiveness of the new and standard strategy. Cost and health outcomes were calculated based on the proportion of cohort in each respective health state. Total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention and comparator strategies were calculated. The model parameter uncertainties were evaluated by sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Considering decentralised HBV diagnosis followed by early treatment and vaccination for negatives for a cohort of 1000 population resulted in 505 QALYs gained and incremental cost-saving of 180749 ($2620). The decentralised diagnostic strategy could avert 294 deaths, gain 293 life years and reduce out-of-pocket expenditure of 3274 ($47) per person for HBV management. CONCLUSION: Decentralised HBV diagnosis followed by early treatment and vaccination for negatives in Tamil Nadu can save lives and reduce out-of-pocket expenditures compared to standard strategy.

OBJECTIF: Evaluer le rapport coût-efficacité du programme de diagnostic décentralisé du virus de l'hépatite B (VHB) mis en œuvre au Tamil Nadu, dans le sud de l'Inde, avec un accent particulier sur une population clé sélectionnée à risque accru du VHB. MÉTHODES: Une combinaison d'arbre de décision et de modèle de Markov a été développée pour comparer la rentabilité de la stratégie nouvelle et standard. Les coûts et les résultats pour la santé ont été calculés sur base de la proportion de la cohorte dans chaque état de santé respectif. Les coûts totaux, les années de vie corrigées de la qualité (QALY), le rapport coût-efficacité supplémentaire de l'intervention et les stratégies de comparaison ont été calculés. Les incertitudes des paramètres du modèle ont été évaluées par analyse de sensibilité. RÉSULTATS: La prise en compte d'un diagnostic décentralisé du VHB suivi d'un traitement précoce et d'une vaccination des cas négatifs pour une cohorte de 1000 habitants a permis de gagner 505 QALY et d'économiser des coûts supplémentaires de ₹180.749 (2.620 USD). La stratégie de diagnostic décentralisée pourrait éviter 294 décès, gagner 293 années de vie et réduire les dépenses personnelles de ₹3274 (47 USD) par personne pour la prise en charge du VHB. CONCLUSION: Le diagnostic décentralisé du VHB suivi d'un traitement précoce et de la vaccination des cas négatifs au Tamil Nadu peut sauver des vies et réduire les dépenses personnelles par rapport à la stratégie standard.