Multistage Rectal Polypectomy: An Alternative to Proctectomy in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

INTRODUCTION: When patients with familial adenomatous polyposis have a severely affected rectum, it is usually assumed that endoscopic control is impossible or unwise. The standard approach is proctectomy with either an end ileostomy or an IPAA. Here we show that application of aggressive, multistage snare polypectomy to this situation can be effective and allow the patient to avoid surgery, at least in the short term. TECHNIQUE: Standard polypectomy using snare excision with coagulation is used, taking 2 or 3 sessions, and beginning with the largest polyps. The procedures are performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Endoscopic mucosal resection technique with fluid injection to lift polyps is not necessary. RESULTS: Complete control of the rectal polyps, sustained for at least 2 years, is possible without functional sequelas. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis with severe rectal polyposis can be offered multistage rectal polypectomy and safely avoid proctectomy.

Is early anvil placement an alternative technique to reduce anastomotic leak after rectosigmoid cancer resection?

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most disastrous complications after rectosigmoid cancer operations. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the insertion time of circular stapler anvil on assessing the blood supply of the proximal colon segment, and thus to evaluate the prevention of early anastomotic leaks. MATERIAL METHODS: A total of 57 patients were included in the study, 25 patients in group A and 32 patients in group B, respectively. From the beginning of the operation to the time of anvil placement in group A, it was 32.08 (± 7.34) minutes, and in group B it was 92.19 (± 16.63) minutes. None of the patients in group A had AL, and 4 patients in group B had AL. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that the anvil must be placed at the beginning of the dissection to evaluate the anomalies that cause anastomotic leaks. We think that this method increases the reliability of the anastomosis line. Thus, the hospitalization period of the patients was shortened and they returned to their active lives faster. In addition, patients used less antibiotics and they needed less medical treatment. KEY WORDS: Anastomotic leaks, Anvil, Rectosigmoid cancer placement, Stapler colorectal.

Evaluation of a Novel Trocar-Site Closure Device in Laparoscopic Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of EZ-CloseTM compared to those of hand suture for trocar-site closure according to obesity. METHODS: Fifty-four cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery were enrolled. For the same patient, the right port site was closed using EZ-CloseTM and left port site was closed by hand suture among cases with port-site diameter ≥10 mm. Cases switched to use of a conventional fascial closure device or with closure time 120 s were considered failures. Closure time was analyzed according to body mass index (BMI) and abdominal wall thickness (AWT). RESULTS: The mean closure time was significantly shorter with EZ-CloseTM than with hand suture (87.9 ± 21.0 vs. 128.0 ± 59.0 s, p < 0.001). The number of failure cases was significantly lower with EZ-CloseTM than with hand suture (7 vs. 27, p < 0.001). The closure time of EZ-CloseTM was significantly shorter than that of hand suture in patients with BMI ≥ 25 and < 27 kg/m2 (n = 15, 85.9 ± 19.8 vs. 135.6 ± 67.9 s, p < 0.014) and ≥ 27 kg/m2 (n = 13, 85.1 ± 18.4 vs. 150.2 ± 70.6 s, p < 0.010). With respect to AWT, the closure time of EZ-CloseTM was significantly shorter than that of hand suture in patients with AWT ≥ 20 and < 26 mm (n = 12, 81.1 ± 11.5 vs. 142.3 ± 83.7 s, p = 0.023) and ≥ 26 mm (n = 17, 85.6 ± 22.6 vs. 160.2 ± 55.5, p < 0.001). No infection and herniation were detected in both trocar sites during the follow-up period (median 20.4 months). CONCLUSION: EZ-CloseTM could provide time efficiency in trocar-site closure, especially in obese patients.

Totally robotic vs hybrid abdominoperineal resection: A retrospective multicenter analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancers is technically demanding. Robotic assistance may be of help and can be hybrid (HAPR) or totally robotic (RAPR). The present study describes outcomes of robotic APR and compares both approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric retrospective analysis of rectal cancer patients undergoing either HAPR or RAPR was conducted. Patients' demographics, surgeons' experience, oncologic results, and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients were included, 48 in HAPR group and 77 in RAPR group. Demographics and comorbidities were comparable. Operative time was reduced in RAPR group (266.9 ± 107.8 min vs 318.9 ± 75.1 min, P = .001). RAPR patients were discharged home more frequently (91.18% vs 66.67%, P = .001), and experienced fewer parastomal hernias (3.71% vs 9.86%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: RAPR is safe and feasible with appropriate oncologic outcomes. Totally robotic approach reduces operative time and may improve functional outcomes.

[Prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage in patients with rectal cancer]. / Profilaktika nesostoiatel'nosti shvov kolorektal'nogo anastomoza u bol'nykh rakom priamoi kishki.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a technique of anastomosis sutures protection using the Foley catheter in rectal cancer surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: There were 42 patients with rectal cancer T1-3N0-2M0 (the 7th TNM edition) who underwent radical sphincter-sparing surgery with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for the period from November 2016 to June 2018. All procedures were performed at the Regional Clinical Oncology Center. All operations were completed with formation of colorectal anastomosis in 'end-to-side' fashion. Patients were divided into 2 groups (main and control) depending on used technique. In the main group (n=20), Foley catheter #30 in accordance with original method was used to protect the anastomosis. Preventive colostomy was applied in 15 patients. The control group consisted of 22 patients. None of these patients underwent prevention of anastomosis leakage. Preventive colostomy was performed in 14 patients. RESULTS: There were no early postoperative complications in the main group. The catheter was removed after 7-9 days. In the control group, 5 patients had symptoms of anastomotic leakage (22.5%; p<0.05). Medication was effective in 4 cases. Re-laparotomy were required in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Thus, anastomosis sutures protection using the Foley catheter is quite reliable and technically simple procedure with favorable outcomes.

The value of force and torque measurements in transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).

BACKGROUND: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is associated with a relatively long learning curve. Force, motion, and time parameters are increasingly used for objective assessment of skills to enhance laparoscopic training efficacy. The aim of this study was to identify relevant metrics for accurate skill assessment in more complex transanal purse-string suturing. METHODS: A box trainer was designed for TaTME and equipped with two custom made multi-DOF force/torque sensors. These sensors measured the applied forces in the axial direction of the instruments (Fz), instrument load orientation expressed in torque (Mx and My) on the entrance port, and the full tissue interaction force (Fft) at the intestine fixation point. In a construct validity study, novices for TaTME performed a purse-string suture to investigate which parameters can be used best to identify meaningful events during tissue manipulation and instrument handling. RESULTS: Significant differences exist between pre- and post-training assessment for the mean axial force at the entrance port Fz (p = 0.01), mean torque in the entrance port Mx (p = 0.03) and mean force on the intestine during suturing Fft (p = 0.05). Furthermore, force levels during suturing exceed safety threshold values, potentially leading to dangerous complications such as rupture of the rectum. CONCLUSIONS: Forces and torque measured at the entrance port, and the tissue interaction force signatures provide detailed insight into instrument handling, instrument loading, and tissue handling during purse-string suturing in a TaTME training setup. This newly developed training setup for single-port laparoscopy that enables objective feedback has the potential to enhance surgical training in TaTME.

Impact of a Dual-Ring Wound Protector on Outcome After Elective Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of dual-ring wound protectors (DRWPs) on the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing elective surgery remains unclear. The aim of this cohort study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes after CRC resection with or without use of a DRWP. METHODS: This study enrolled 625 patients with stage I-III CRC undergoing curative resection and divided them into DRWP (n = 348) and control (n = 277) groups. Primary endpoints were postoperative short- and long-term complications. Secondary endpoints were oncological outcomes including wound recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Rates of postoperative complications (P = 0.004) and laparotomy wound infection (LWI) (P < 0.001) were markedly lower in the DRWP group. Operation quality, as per the number of lymph nodes harvested and rate of R0 resection, did not differ between the groups (all P > 0.05). The DRWP group exhibited significantly lower rates of incisional hernia occurrence (5.3% versus 9.5%, P = 0.045) compared with the control group. Multivariable analyses demonstrated an increased risk of LWI with no wound protector in colorectal surgery (odds ratio, 3.778; P = 0.001), and patients who developed LWI after surgery were more than 4 times more likely to develop an incisional hernia during outpatient follow-up (odds ratio, 4.333; P = 0.001). One patient in the control group (0.36%) had isolated wound recurrence at 12 mo postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer postoperative and late complications, comparable oncological safety, and similar long-term clinical outcomes confirmed the benefits of DRWP use for patients with CRC undergoing elective surgery. Therefore, the use of DRWP may be considered in curative CRC resection.

Protection of colorectal anastomosis with an intraluminal bypass device for patients undergoing an elective anterior resection: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the only clinically valid method to prevent morbidity and mortality related to colorectal anastomotic leaks is by construction of a protective ileostomy. Intraluminal bypass might also be a possible way to proctect the anastomosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the CG-100 intraluminal bypass device for the reduction of anastomosis-related morbidity and stoma creation in cases of rectal resection. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on patients having sphincter-preserving rectal resection who were treated with the CG-100 device at Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel between May 2015 and February 2017. The device was implanted during surgery and removed after 10 ± 1 days. All patients underwent a radiologic leak test with water-soluble contrast prior to removal of the device. Patients were followed for 30 days. Information about adverse events, anastomotic leaks, device usability and tolerance were collected. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients participated in the study. Most patients were operated on due to cancer 44 (93.6%). Four (9%) patients received a primary protective stoma on top of the CG-100 device as part of the learning curve of the surgical team and none required a stoma after device removal. Five (9%) serious adverse events were reported, but only 2 (4%) were classified as related to the device. One was a transient enterocutaneous fistula after removal of the device. The second was an asymptomatic radiologic leak in 1 (2.1%) patient which was treated by keeping the device in place and antibiotic treatment for another 10 days without creation of diverting ileostomy. CONCLUSIONS: CG-100 may provide a safe method for fecal diversion over a newly created anastomosis without the complications related to stoma creation and closure. A larger prospective randomized study in patients originally scheduled to receive diverting stoma is needed to confirm these findings.

Comparison of anastomotic leakage rate and reoperation rate between transanal tube placement and defunctioning stoma after anterior resection: A network meta-analysis of clinical data.

OBJECTIVE: Defunctioning stoma (DS) and transanal tube (TT) placement have all been reported to be effective procedures to prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection. However, there are few studies that directly compare the 2 procedures, and those that do are unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search from the databases of Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library. We limited the publication date from 2008/01/01 to 2018/07/29. The bias risk of eligible randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were assessed by Cochrane Collaboration's tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. The direct meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. The network graph, inconsistency test and comparison-adjusted funnel plot were performed by the Stata 14.0 software. The indirect meta-analysis and rank probabilities were performed by GeMTC R package. RESULTS: 6 randomized controlled trials and 26 cohort studies were included in our meta-analysis. All eligible studies were assessed as low risk of bias. The anastomotic leakage rate and reoperation rate was lower in the patients receiving DS or TT placement than patients with non-protection. DS shared similar anastomotic leakage rate with TT. However, the reoperation rate was significantly lower in patients receiving DS than patients receiving TT. CONCLUSION: Both TT and DS were protective factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. DS reduced severity of anastomotic leakage in a more effective way than TT placement. However, we still suggested the routing use of TT for decreasing the risk of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection because it was cheaper and technically simpler.

Sphincter-saving proctectomy for rectal cancer with NO COIL® transanal tube and without ostoma. Clinical outcomes, cost effectiveness and quality of life in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common invasive cancers, and it is responsible for considerable physical and psychosocial morbidity specially in older patients. However, only few reports focused on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients undergone to surgery. This retrospective study compares short-term and long-term outcomes in rectal cancer patients with more and less than 75 years of age. METHODS: Four hundred consecutive patients underwent radical surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma and they were collected in a prospective institutional database and divided into two groups: group 1 (≥75 years, N.=98); group 2 (<75 years, N.=302). Rectal anterior resection (RAR) with sphincter-saving restorative proctectomy and with application of silicone transanal tube NO COIL® 60-80 mm long, was the only procedure considered. Main clinical and pathological data were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the two groups were detected regard to comorbidities and the emergency presentation. Overall survival is lower in patients over 75 age, but cancer-related survival is not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although advanced age is associated with higher morbidity and mortality, in our experience, itself is not a contraindication for surgical sphincter-saving proctetomy in rectal cancer patients. The absence of a stoma also improved the cost effectiveness and patients' quality of life in both groups: psychological morbidity, sexuality, levels of anxiety and depression, body image.