When Walter Freeman Came to Town: The Prefrontal Lobotomy at Rochester State Hospital.

In the United States, frontal lobe lesioning procedures have been uniformly linked to the neurologist Walter Freeman, although the prefrontal lobotomy was investigated in other institutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, Russia, Japan, and China, mostly in patients with psychosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and/or intractable pain syndromes. These procedures were based on earlier reports of improvement of psychiatric symptoms after surgical resection of frontal lobe tumors and led many to infer a causal relationship between frontal lobe dysfunction and abnormal behavior. Freeman first visited Rochester, MN, as a medical student in a gastrointestinal laboratory at the Mayo Clinic. Freeman visited Rochester again many years later, a visit that was received with trepidation but ultimately led to the adoption of his lobotomy method. Freeman's grandfather, W.W. Keen, was a highly respected surgeon credited with the first successful surgical resection of a benign brain tumor in the United States, a connection that may have contributed to Freeman's subsequent interest in performing lobotomies. Keen maintained a close relationship with the Mayo brothers and also advocated for Freeman's initial visit to the Mayo Clinic. In this article, we present a brief historical review of Freeman and the early reports of the prefrontal lobotomy procedure performed by consultants affiliated with the Mayo Clinic and Rochester State Hospital.

Psychosurgery in Indian Scenario: Time to Think with Phronesis.

With advances in technology, neurosurgical procedures are being examined for potential use in psychiatric conditions. However, the use of neurosurgical procedures in psychiatry carries the baggage of memories of psychosurgery. Different neurosurgical techniques carry their characteristic safety, efficacy, and complication profile. The introduction of deep brain stimulation has generated a new interest in surgical treatment with a distinct advantage over lesioning procedures used in the past. In such a scenario, it is essential that an informed discussion takes place regarding the use of these neurosurgical procedures in psychiatric disorders such that patient safety, informed consent, regulatory requirements, and research are taken care of.

The Value of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Brain Surgery.

Favorable clinical outcomes in adult and pediatric neurosurgical oncology generally depend on the extent of tumor resection (EOR). Maximum safe resection remains the main aim of surgery in most intracranial tumors. Despite the accuracy of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in the detection of residual intraoperatively, it is not widely implemented worldwide owing to enormous cost and technical difficulties. Over the past years, intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) has imposed itself as a valuable and reliable intraoperative tool guiding neurosurgeons to achieve gross total resection (GTR) of intracranial tumors.Being less expensive, feasible, doesn't need a high level of training, doesn't need a special workspace, and being real time with outstanding temporal and spatial resolution; all the aforementioned advantages give a superiority for IOUS in comparison to iMRI during resection of brain tumors.In this chapter, we spot the light on the technical nuances, advanced techniques, outcomes of resection, pearls, and pitfalls of the use of IOUS during the resection of brain tumors.

Predicting 30-Day Non-Seizure Outcomes Following Temporal Lobectomy with Personalized Machine Learning Models.

BACKGROUND: Temporal lobe epilepsy is the most common reason behind drug-resistant seizures and temporal lobectomy (TL) is performed after all other efforts have been taken for a Temporal lobe epilepsy. Our study aims to develop multiple machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting postoperative outcomes following TL surgery. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database identified patients who underwent TL surgery. We focused on 3 outcomes: prolonged length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharges, and 30-day readmissions. Six ML algorithms, TabPFN, XGBoost, LightGBM, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression, coupled with the Optuna optimization library for hyperparameter tuning, were tested. Models with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) values were included in the web application. SHapley Additive exPlanations was used to evaluate importance of predictor variables. RESULTS: Our analysis included 423 patients. Of these patients, 111 (26.2%) experienced prolonged LOS, 33 (7.8%) had nonhome discharges, and 29 (6.9%) encountered 30-day readmissions. The top-performing models for each outcome were those built with the Random Forest algorithm. The Random Forest models yielded AUROCs of 0.868, 0.804, and 0.742 in predicting prolonged LOS, nonhome discharges, and 30-day readmissions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study uses ML to forecast adverse postoperative outcomes following TL. We developed accessible predictive models that enhance prognosis prediction for TL surgery. Making ML models available for this purpose represents a significant advancement in shifting toward a more patient-centric, data-driven paradigm.

A multi-center comparison of surgical techniques for corpus Callosotomy in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: Corpus callosotomy (CC) is used to reduce seizures, primarily in patients with generalized drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The invasive nature of the procedure contributes to underutilization despite its potential superiority to other palliative procedures. The goal of this study was to use a multi-institutional epilepsy surgery database to characterize the use of CC across participating centers. METHODS: Data were acquired from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database, a prospective observational study collecting data on children 0-18 years referred for surgical evaluation of DRE across 22 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers. Patient, epilepsy, and surgical characteristics were collected across multiple CC modalities. Outcomes and complications were recorded and analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients undergoing 85 CC procedures at 14 participating epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. Mean age at seizure onset was 2.3 years (0-9.4); mean age for Phase I evaluation and surgical intervention were 9.45 (.1-20) and 10.46 (.2-20.6) years, respectively. Generalized seizure types were the most common (59%). Complete CC was performed in 88%. The majority of CC procedures (57%) were via open craniotomy, followed by laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT) (20%) and mini-craniotomy/endoscopic (mc/e) (22%). Mean operative times were significantly longer for LiTT, whereas mean estimated blood loss was greater in open cases. Complications occurred in 11 cases (13%) and differed significantly between surgical techniques (p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in length of postoperative stay across approaches. Mean follow-up was 12.8 months (range 1-39). Favorable Engel outcomes were experienced by 37 (78.7%) of the patients who underwent craniotomy, 10 (58.8%) with LiTT, and 12 (63.2%) with mc/e; these differences were not statistically significant. SIGNIFICANCE: CC is an effective surgical modality for children with DRE. Regardless of surgical modality, complication rates are acceptable and seizure outcomes generally favorable. Newer, less-invasive, surgical approaches may lead to increased adoption of this efficacious therapeutic option for pediatric DRE.

Esquadrinhando corpos, mutilando histórias: as psicocirurgias aplicadas nas mulheres internadas no Hospício de Juquery / Scrutinizing bodies, mutilating histories: the psychosurgeries undergone by women at Juquery Mental Asylum

Ao longo de seus quatro capítulos, faz um percurso sobre a conformação da psiquiatria organicista, sobre o contexto histórico da sociedade paulista do segundo quartel do século XX, dedicando especial atenção às questões endógenas do Juquery no que tange ao perfil de seus psiquiatras e pacientes. Desse modo, Eliza Toledo lança luz sobre personagens destacados nesse contexto que, até então, careciam de maior atenção da historiografia, como, a título de exemplo, os médicos Mário Yahn e Aloysio de Mattos Pimenta. Ambos desenvolveram variações das técnicas propostas por Egas Moniz e angariaram prestígio entre seus pares ao publicar, em importantes periódicos nacionais e internacionais, uma série de artigos sobre as psicocirurgias, aplicadas invariavelmente em mulheres.

3D4K exoscope in epilepsy surgery: a seminal experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To report the progressive introduction of the exoscope (EX) from surface lesionectomy to antero-mesial temporal lobectomy (AMTL) in an epilepsy surgery practice. METHODS: We describe a population of ten consecutive patients undergoing EX surgery, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, that was compared to a similar population of patients referred to operative microscopic surgery (OM). RESULTS: All surgeries were performed with the use of EX or OM alone. Transient neurological complications for surgery in eloquent regions were recorded in one patient for each population. Nine and seven patients undergoing, respectively, EX and OM surgery resulted in Engel class Ia (90% vs. 70%). The mean duration of EX and OM surgery resulted in 265.5 and 237.9 min, respectively, with a mean of 308.3 and 253.3 min for AMTL cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study revealed that ORBEYE EX can be safe and effective in different types of epilepsy surgeries. The transition from OM to EX is fast, even though it is slower for the more challenging mesial temporal structure removal. Ergonomic and operative team interaction is improved by the use of EX. Our data need to be confirmed by larger studies.

Corpus Callosotomy Is a Safe and Effective Procedure for Medically Resistant Epilepsy.

Corpus callosotomy (CC) is an effective surgical treatment for medically resistant generalized or multifocal epilepsy (MRE). The premise of CC extrapolates from the observation that the corpus callosum is the predominant commissural pathway that allows spread and synchroneity of epileptogenic activity between the hemispheres. Candidacy for CC is typically reserved for patients seeking palliative epilepsy treatment with the goal of reducing the frequency of drop attacks, although reduction of other seizure semiologies (absence, complex partial seizures, and tonic-clonic) has been observed. A reduction in morbidity affiliated with evolution of surgical techniques to perform CC has improved the safety profile of the procedure without necessarily sacrificing efficacy.

Psychiatric changes after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy for medial temporal lobe epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) that has comparable rates of seizure freedom to traditional open resective TLE surgery. The objective of this study was to determine psychiatric outcome (i.e., depression and anxiety changes, psychosis) after SLAH, to explore possible contributory factors to these changes, and to determine the prevalence of de novo psychopathology. METHODS: We explored mood and anxiety in 37 adult patients with TLE undergoing SLAH using the Beck psychiatric symptoms scales (i.e., Beck Depression Inventory-II [BDI-II] and Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) preoperatively and 6 months following surgery. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of worse depression or anxiety symptoms following SLAH. The prevalence of de novo psychopathology following SLAH was also determined. RESULTS: We found a significant decrease in BDI-II (mean decline from 16.3 to 10.9, p = 0.004) and BAI (mean decline from 13.3 to 9.0, p = 0.045) scores following SLAH at the group level. While the rate of resolution of depression (from 62% to 49%) did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.13, McNemar's), the rate of resolution of anxiety (from 57% to 35%) was statistically significant (p = 0.03, McNemar's). The de novo rate of psychopathology (i.e., new onset depression or anxiety) following SLAH was 1 of 7 (14%). Using a metric of meaningful change rather than complete symptom resolution, 16 of 37 (43%) patients experienced improvement in depression and 6 of 37 (16%) experienced worsening. For anxiety, 14 of 37 (38%) experienced meaningful improvement and 8 of 37 (22%) experienced worsening. Baseline performance on the Beck Scales was the only factor contributing to outcome status. DISCUSSION: In one of the first studies to evaluate psychiatric outcomes after SLAH, we found promising overall trends toward stability or significant improvement in symptom burden at the group level for both depression and anxiety. There was also a significant improvement in clinical anxiety, though the decrease in clinical depression was not significant, likely owing to the limitations of sample size. SLAH may improve overall psychiatric symptoms, similarly to traditional resective TLE surgery, but de novo psychopathology and postoperative psychiatric morbidity remain significant issues, and larger samples are necessary to determine causal contributory factors.

Happy Birthday "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest": A Momentous Tale in the Quest for an Effective and Ethical Approach to Psychosurgery.

The anniversary of the publication of 'One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest' by Ken Kesey offers an opportunity for reflection on the use of neurosurgery in psychiatry. We used a narrative, historical and dialectical method to deliver an account of the controversial subject. A balanced representation of the negative and positive aspects, acknowledging some of the questionable ethical practices while describing well-reasoned applications is provided. It includes neurosurgeons, psychiatrists who have embraced these procedures with unwarranted enthusiasm and those who have opposed. Neurosurgical techniques for the treatment of severe mental disorders have evolved from rudimentary procedures which were used to 'correct' unwanted behaviours associated with a wide range of severe mental disorders to more refined and selective approaches used as a last resort to treat specific mental health conditions. In the absence of specific aetiological models to guide ablative surgical targets, non-ablative, stimulatory techniques have more recently been developed to allow reversibility when surgical treatment fails to obtain a sizeable improvement in quality of life. The subject is concretely illustrated by two eloquent clinical images: one on a series of brain computed tomography scans carried out on a Canadian population of subjects, who underwent leukotomy decades ago, and the other more contemporary on an implantation surgery to epidural stimulation. Alongside technical advances in psychosurgery, a regulatory framework has gradually developed to ensure vigilance in the appropriateness of patients' selection. Nevertheless, harmonisation of protocols around the world is necessary to ensure consistency in obtaining and maintaining the highest possible ethical standards for the benefit of patients. If the neurosciences promise today, in their new, better framed, and reversible applications, to provide answers to unmet therapeutic needs, we still must remain attentive to drifts linked the introduction of intrusive technologies for purposes of domination or behaviour modification that would impede our individual freedom.

Lobectomy versus gross total resection for glioblastoma multiforme: A systematic review and individual-participant data meta-analysis.

Overall survival (OS)for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a known association with the extent of tumor resection with gross total resection (GTR) typically considered as the upper limit. In certain regions such as the anterior temporal lobe, more extensive resection by means of a lobectomy may be feasible. In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of lobectomy and GTR for GBM. PubMed and Embase were queriedfor studies that compared the outcomes after lobectomy or GTR for GBM. The primary outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and Karnofksy Performance Status (KPS) score at the latest follow-up. The secondary outcomes were seizure control at the latest follow-up and complication rates. Meta-analysis for OS and PFS was performed using individual-participant data reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed for KPS. The secondary outcomes were pooled using descriptive statistics. Of the 795 records screened, 6 were included in our study. Meta-analysis revealed that anterior temporal, frontal, or occipital lobectomy was associated with significantly better OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001) than GTR, but not KPS (MD = 6.37; 95% CI=(-13.80, 26.54); p = 0.536). Anterior temporal lobectomy was associated with significantly better seizure control rates than GTR for temporal GBM (OR = 27; 95% CI=(1.4, 515.9); p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between anterior temporal, frontal, or occipital lobectomy and GTR. In conclusion, lobectomy was associated with significantly better OS, PFS, and seizure control than GTR for GBM.

Cognitive outcomes following functional neurosurgery in refractory OCD patients: a systematic review.

Neurosurgery is a therapeutic option for patients with refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder who do not respond to previous treatments. Although its efficacy in reducing clinical symptomatology has been proven, few studies have analyzed its effects at the cognitive level. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the cognitive outcomes of functional neurosurgery in patients that went through capsulotomies or cingulotomies. PubMed, Medline, Scopus, PsycInfo, PsyArticles, and Web of Knowledge were searched for studies reporting cognitive outcomes in refractory obsessive-compulsive patients after capsulotomies and cingulotomies. The risk of bias was assessed with the Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies With No Control Group tool; 13 studies met inclusion criteria, including 205 refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder patients for both surgical procedures. Results showed a substantial number of studies that did report significant cognitive improvement after surgery, being this improvement specially related to memory and executive functions. The second-most frequent finding is the maintenance of cognitive performance (nor improvement or worsening). From a neuropsychological point of view, this outcome might be considered a success, given that it is accompanied by amelioration of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Subtle cognitive adverse effects have also been reported. Neurosurgery procedures appear to be safe from a cognitive point of view. Methodological issues must be improved to draw clearer conclusions, but capsulotomies and cingulotomies constitute an effective alternative treatment for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder patients.

Future directions in psychiatric neurosurgery: Proceedings of the 2022 American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery meeting on surgical neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in the treatment of psychiatric diseases, currently available therapies do not provide sufficient and durable relief for as many as 30-40% of patients. Neuromodulation, including deep brain stimulation (DBS), has emerged as a potential therapy for persistent disabling disease, however it has not yet gained widespread adoption. In 2016, the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ASSFN) convened a meeting with leaders in the field to discuss a roadmap for the path forward. A follow-up meeting in 2022 aimed to review the current state of the field and to identify critical barriers and milestones for progress. DESIGN: The ASSFN convened a meeting on June 3, 2022 in Atlanta, Georgia and included leaders from the fields of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry along with colleagues from industry, government, ethics, and law. The goal was to review the current state of the field, assess for advances or setbacks in the interim six years, and suggest a future path forward. The participants focused on five areas of interest: interdisciplinary engagement, regulatory pathways and trial design, disease biomarkers, ethics of psychiatric surgery, and resource allocation/prioritization. The proceedings are summarized here. CONCLUSION: The field of surgical psychiatry has made significant progress since our last expert meeting. Although weakness and threats to the development of novel surgical therapies exist, the identified strengths and opportunities promise to move the field through methodically rigorous and biologically-based approaches. The experts agree that ethics, law, patient engagement, and multidisciplinary teams will be critical to any potential growth in this area.