Comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication rates between 7 and 14 days of tailored therapy according to clarithromycin resistance test: A randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a simple tailored therapy based on clarithromycin resistance has been implemented as Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy. Nonetheless, despite the tailored therapy and frequent adverse events, studies on treatment period are lacking. This study aimed to compare the H. pylori eradication rates of 7-day and 14-day tailored therapy regimens according to clarithromycin resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial enrolled H. pylori-positive patients who were randomly assigned to 7-day and 14-day regimen groups, depending on the presence or absence of clarithromycin resistance by 23S rRNA gene point mutations. Standard triple therapy (STT) (20 mg rabeprazole, 1 g amoxicillin, and 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily) or bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) (20 mg rabeprazole twice daily, 500 mg metronidazole thrice daily, 120 mg bismuth four times daily, and 500 mg tetracycline four times daily) was assigned by clarithromycin resistance. Eradication rates and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 314 and 278 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively; however, 31 patients were lost to follow-up, whereas five patients violated the protocol. Both the 7-day and 14-day regimens showed similar eradication rates in the ITT (7-day vs. 14-day: 78.3% vs. 78.3%, p > 0.99) and PP (87.9% vs. 89.1%, p = 0.851) analyses. Non-inferiority was confirmed (p < 0.025). A subgroup analysis according to clarithromycin resistance (clarithromycin resistance rate: 28.7%) revealed no significant difference in eradication rates between the 7-day and 14-day STT (90.0% vs. 90.1%, p > 0.99) and BQT (82.5% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.757). Furthermore, adverse events did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-day triple and quadruple therapy according to clarithromycin resistance showed similar eradication rates, as compared to the 14-day therapy.

Amoxicillin, gemifloxacin and rabeprazole, as first-line Helicobacter pylori therapy in clinical practice: A pilot study.

Success in eradication of H. pylori is decreasing due to increasing resistant strains. In particular, side-effects due to 4-agent treatment multiple drug use are observed and treatment compliance decreases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, reliability, and side-effect profile of the combination of amoxicillin and rabeprazole with gemifloxacin, which is a new generation quinolone, in the treatment of H. pylori infection. This study was conducted on 71 naive patients who received H. pylori eradication. All the patients were administered treatment of Amoxicillin (1000 mg twice a day) + Gemifloxacin (320 mg once a day) + rabeprazole (20 mg twice a day) for 7 days. Drug compliance and treatment tolerance were evaluated after finishing the treatment. At 1 month after the end of the treatment, H. pylori eradication was evaluated in all the patients by examining H. pylori antigen in the feces. In the evaluation after treatment, H. pylori eradication was obtained in 63 (88.7%) patients and eradication was not obtained in 8 (11.3%) patients. The treatment was not completed by 2 patients because of side-effects and noncompliance, so after exclusion of these 2 patients, successful H. pylori eradication was obtained in 63 (91.3%) of 69 patients who completed the treatment. Side-effects were seen in a total of 9 (12.7%) patients. Diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain, and nausea-vomiting were seen in some patients, but no reflux, constipation, skin rash, listlessness-fatigue, headache, dizziness, palpitations, dry mouth, or weight loss was seen in any patient. In regions with high resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in particular, the combination of gemifloxacin with amoxicillin and rabeprazole can be considered for use in first-stage treatment as both the efficacy and tolerability are high.

Rabeprazole suppresses cell proliferation in gastric epithelial cells by targeting STAT3-mediated glycolysis.

The dysregulation of glycolysis leads to serials of disease. Rabeprazole is a representative of proton pump inhibitors and widely used in anti-ulcer treatment. However, the function of Rabeprazole on glycolysis in gastric epithelial cells remained to be identified. In this study, 30（Helicobacter pylori）H. pylori-negative cases and 26H. pylori-positive cases treated with Rabeprazole were recruited. The qPCR and Western blotting results showed that Rabeprazole suppressed cell proliferation by inhibition of HK2-mediated glycolysis in BGC823 cells, leading to decrease glucose uptake and lactate production in a dose-dependent way. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was drastically reduced in response to Rabeprazole stimulation, leading to attenuate STAT3 nuclear translocation. Luciferase and Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis showed that Rabeprazole treatment led to a significant inhibition of the binding of STAT3 to the promoter of the HK2 gene, repressing transcriptional activation of HK2. Moreover, the ectopic expression of STAT3 in BGC823 cells resulted in recovery of HK2 transactivation and cell proliferation in Rabeprazole-treated cells. Most importantly, HK2 expression was significantly increased in H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa. These findings suggested that Rabeprazole inhibited cell proliferation by targeting STAT3/HK2 signaling-mediated glucose metabolism in gastric epithelial cells. Therefore, targeting HK2 is an alternative strategy in improving the treatment of patients with H. pylori infection.

Gastric mucosal changes, and sex differences therein, after Helicobacter pylori eradication: A long-term prospective follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Improvement of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia (IM) is considered to reduce the gastric cancer risk, but whether it can be achieved by H. pylori eradication (HPE) remains controversial. To evaluate the effect of HPE, we observed the gastric mucosa for up to17 years after HPE and sex differences in gastric mucosa. METHODS: In total, 172 patients (94 males, 78 females) with HPE were enrolled. Annual histological evaluations were performed for up to 17 years. The grades of mononuclear cells, neutrophils, atrophy, IM in the antrum and corpus were evaluated using the updated Sydney system. RESULTS: Relative to the pre-HPE period, atrophy had improved significantly 1 year after HPE in the antrum (1.50 ± 0.75 vs. 1.21 ± 1.25, P < 0.01) and corpus (0.59 ± 0.75 vs. 0.18 ± 0.52, P < 0.05). IM showed no significant change during 17 years after HPE at either biopsy site. Atrophy scores did not differ significantly between males and females. IM scores were significantly higher in males than in females before eradication (antrum, 0.67 ± 0.94 vs. 0.44 ± 0.77, P = 0.003, corpus, 0.20 ± 0.62 vs. 0.047 ± 0.21, P = 0.0027) and at most observation timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: During 17 years after HPE, atrophy, but not IM, improved significantly at the greater curvatures of the antrum and corpus. IM was significantly more severe in males than in females. Careful follow-up after HPE based on sex differences in gastric mucosal characteristics is important.

Acute kidney injury following the use of different proton pump inhibitor regimens: A real-world analysis of post-marketing surveillance data.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recent evidence has concerned acute kidney injury (AKI) after the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) application. There are few real-world studies to compare the occurrences, clinical features, and prognosis of AKI related to various PPI regimens. We aimed to evaluate and compare the links between different PPIs and AKI in a large population by investigating the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) until recently. METHODS: Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used in data mining to screen the suspected AKI after different PPIs based on the FAERS from January 2004 to December 2019. The times to onset, fatality, and hospitalization rates of PPI-associated AKI were also investigated. RESULTS: We identified 19 522 PPI-associated AKIs, which appeared to influence more middle-aged patients than elderly ones (53.04% vs 33.94%). Women were more affected than men (55.42% vs 44.58%). Lansoprazole appeared a stronger AKI association than other PPIs, based on the highest reporting odds ratio (reporting odds ratio = 20.8, 95% confidence interval = 20.16, 21.46), proportional reporting ratio (proportional reporting ratio = 15.55, χ2  = 73 899.68), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (empirical Bayes geometric mean = 15.15, 95% confidence interval = 14.76). The median time to AKI onset was 446 (interquartile range [IQR] 16-2176) days after PPI administration. PPIs showed a significant difference in average time to AKI onset (P < 0.001), with the shortest of 9 (IQR 3-25) days for rabeprazole and the longest of 1221 (IQR 96.5-2620) days for esomeprazole. PPI-associated AKI generally led to a 5.69% fatality rate and an 8.94% hospitalization rate. The highest death rate occurred in rabeprazole (15.35%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the FAERS database, we profiled AKI related to various PPIs with more details in occurrences, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. Concern should be paid for PPIs when applied to patients with a tendency for AKI.

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of Kangfuxin in combination with rabeprazole in the treatment of peptic ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kangfuxin (KFX), a well-known Chinese patent medicine which extracted from Periplaneta americana, is widely used as an adjuvant in the treatment of peptic ulcers (PUs) with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) such as rabeprazole, in China. However, no clear consensus has been reached on the efficacy for PU treatment. METHODS: We searched in 7 electronic databases to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) completed before May 31, 2020 to explore the clinical efficiency of KFX plus rabeprazole in the treatment of PU. Risk ratio (RR) corresponding to 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to estimate the outcomes. Publication bias was assessed by both Egger's and Begg's tests. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata version 10.0. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs, comprising 2555 PU patients, were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed that, when compared with rabeprazole-based treatment alone, KFX plus rabeprazole significantly improved the healing rate (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.25-1.44) and overall response rate of ulcers (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.20), alleviated the clinical symptoms of PU (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21), and reduced the recurrence of PU (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.61) without an increase in the occurrence of adverse events (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.66-1.28). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that KFX combined with rabeprazole showed positive therapeutic effects and is safe for treating PU, which may provide more reliable evidence for the clinical use of KFX in the treatment of PU.

Does Rabeprazole Sodium Alleviate the Anti-diabetic Activity of Linagliptin? Drug-Drug Interaction Analysis by In vitro and In vivo Methods.

Drug interaction has turned into the preeminent regarding issues for a prescriber during polypharmacy. The foremost objective of this research was to form a complex between linagliptin and rabeprazole sodium by in vitro interactions. The interactions between the drugs have been examined by monitoring some chromatographic and spectroscopic analyses viz. TLC, HPLC, FT-IR, UV, Job's plot, conductometric titrations, and Ardon's spectrophotometric strategy. Rabeprazole sodium formed a stable complex with linagliptin, which was ensured from the insight of these analytical data. The developed complex's bright spot was clearly watched in the TLC plate. The retention time (Rt) of the formed complex was 5.303 min, where the Rt were 3.364 and 3.103 min for linagliptin and rabeprazole sodium, respectively, in HPLC chromatograms. In FT-IR and UV spectra of the formed complex revealed some disappearance of characteristic peaks that affirmed the complexation. All of the variations of the spectrophotometric and chromatographic properties from the antecedent drugs indicated the drug-drug interaction. Another crucial fact for the experimental aim was to affirm the assumed drug interaction by in vivo model examination. The assessment of anti-diabetic property on alloxan-induced Swiss albino mice proved significant in vivo interaction between the drugs. It was outlined from the animal study that the hypoglycemic activity of linagliptin might be significantly affected due to the complex formation of the drug with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Nonetheless, it is the primary outcome of the interaction, which recommends the bigger in vivo study or clinical monitoring on the human model.

Searching for an optimal therapy for H pylori eradication: High-dose proton-pump inhibitor dual therapy with amoxicillin vs. standard triple therapy for 14 days.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared a high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) with rabeprazole and amoxicillin and compared it with a standard triple therapy (STT) with rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for 2 weeks for H pylori eradication in treatment naïve patients. METHODS: H pylori-positive patients were randomly assigned to either a rabeparzole (Pariet) 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin (Ospamox) 1 g b.i.d. and clarithromycin (Klacid) 500 mg b.i.d. for 14 days or rabeprazole (Pariet) 20 mg q.i.d., amoxicillin (Ospamox) 1 g q.i.d. also for 14 days. Eradication was tested for by the C13 -UBT at least 4 weeks after the completion of therapy. RESULTS: H pylori was eradicated in 86.2% of patients (81/94) (95% CI: 77.8-91.7) in the STT group compared with 92.8% (90/97) (95% CI: 85.9-96.5) in the HDDT group on ITT analysis. On PP analysis, H pylori was eradicated in 91.0% of patients (81/89) (95% CI: 83.3-95.4) in the STT group compared with 93.8% (90/96) (95% CI: 87.0-97.1) in the HDDT group. Side effects were few although many patients in the STT arm complained of bitter taste. The HDDT arm was well tolerated by patients. CONCLUSIONS: The HDDT gave a high eradication rate comparable to the STT for 2 weeks and was a well-tolerated regimen for H pylori eradication.

Effect of a rabeprazole half-dose twice daily on acid inhibition in patients with different CYP2C19 alleles.

PURPOSE: Fractional doses of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) more often than once daily (qd) inhibit 24-h acid secretion more effectively than an increase in the standard single daily dose. Although rabeprazole 5 mg qd is covered for prevention of aspirin-induced gastric injury under the Japanese insurance system, it is unclear whether rabeprazole 5 mg twice daily (bid) would more effectively inhibit acid secretion. We compared acid inhibition between rabeprazole 10 mg qd and 5 mg bid in healthy volunteers with different alleles of CYP2C19. METHODS: Twelve Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers (CYP2C19 genotypes: extensive metabolizer (EM) (n = 6) and poor metabolizer (PM) (n = 6)) received three kinds of regimen for 7 days under a randomized crossover design: rabeprazole 5 mg qd (5 mg QD), 10 mg qd (10 mg QD), and 5 mg bid (5 mg BID). A 24-hour pH monitoring was conducted before the trial and on day 7 of each regimen. RESULTS: No significant differences in median pH values (4.0 (1.9-5.9)) and (4.4 (2.1-6.5)) or percent time of pH ≥ 4 (50.7% (11.9-86.8%) and 56.8% (19.3-83.9%)) were seen between the 10 mg QD and 5 mg BID regimens. Median pHs and percent time of pH ≥ 4 in CYP2C19 PMs were significantly higher than those in EMs. With 5 mg BID, there was no significant difference in percent-time with pH ≥ 4 between daytime and nighttime, but the 10 mg QD showed a significant difference. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole 5 mg bid provided no therapeutic advantage for acid inhibition compared with rabeprazole 10 mg qd, regardless of CYP2C19 genotype status.

Rabeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy as first-line treatment for H pylori eradication in special patients: A retrospective, real-life study.

BACKGROUND: The currently recommended quadruple regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection might not be appropriate for every patient, especially in elderly patients or those with multiple comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy in H pylori-positive elderly patients or those with multiple comorbidities. METHODS: From November 2013 to May 2017, the clinical data of H pylori-positive patients ≥60 years old or with multiple comorbidities were collected and reviewed. All patients were given rabeprazole 10 mg three times a day and amoxicillin 1000 mg thrice a day (RA dual therapy) for 14 days as first-line treatment. H pylori eradication was evaluated by 13 C-urea breath test 6 weeks after treatment. Adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were enrolled, including 116 elderly patients and 82 patients with multiple comorbidities. Successful eradication was achieved in 90.9% (180/198, 95% CI: 86.1%-94.2%) patients. Adverse effects, which were mainly mild (referring to skin rash, abdominal pain, and diarrhea), occurred in 22 patients (22/198, 11.1%) and resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: Dual therapy composed of rabeprazole and amoxicillin as a first-line treatment appears to be effective and safe for H pylori infection in elderly patients or those with multiple comorbidities. Additional studies are needed to optimize the regimen.

High-dose dual therapy is effective as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although many regimens, including quadruple, sequential, and concomitant treatment, are used and recommended as first-line or rescue therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection, eradication rates are still below 90% in intention-to-treat analyses. Treatment protocols with substantially high eradication rates and low antibiotic resistance are needed. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of high-dose dual therapy as first-line treatment in a Turkish population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the initial H. pylori status because of dyspeptic symptoms. All patients received a 14-day, high-dose dual therapy comprising rabeprazole (20 mg t.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g t.i.d.) for H. pylori eradication. H. pylori stool antigen tests of eradication were administered to all participants at least 4 weeks after the completion of the treatment. RESULTS: The high-dose dual therapy demonstrated a 91.3% rate of successful eradication of H. pylori infection. Per-protocol success was 94.4% among female patients (n=51) and 89.6% among male patients (n=86); in terms of gender, the differences were not significant (p=0.310). No side effects were observed during the study in any patient. Six other patients did not take adequate doses of the treatment protocol. CONCLUSION: High-dose dual therapy with rabeprazole and amoxicillin was highly effective and well tolerated as a first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication.

Proton pump inhibitors enhance intestinal permeability via dysbiosis of gut microbiota under stressed conditions in mice.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal permeability and psychological stress are considered the key mechanism(s) in functional dyspepsia (FD). Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used for the treatment of FD, the effect of PPIs on intestinal permeability has not been elucidated. This study investigated the effect of PPI on intestinal permeability under stressed conditions. METHODS: C57BL/6J mice were subjected to water avoidance stress (WAS) and administered rabeprazole (40 mg/kg) or vehicle treatment (VT). We then evaluated intestinal permeability both in vivo and ex vivo using plasma fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran and by assessing the paracellular permeability and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) in an Ussing chamber, respectively. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of PPI-treated fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) on intestinal permeability in vivo. Microbiota profiles of donor feces were assessed by 16S rRNA gene analysis using MiSeq and QIIME2. KEY RESULTS: In the WAS treatment, PPI significantly enhanced intestinal permeability in vivo compared to that in VT. Moreover, PPI significantly increased paracellular permeability and decreased TEER in the duodenum and jejunum, respectively, compared to those in VT under stressed conditions. Moreover, both vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) receptor antagonist and ketotifen significantly reversed the effect of PPI on intestinal permeability. Furthermore, PPI-treated FMT significantly increased the intestinal permeability in vivo compared to that in vehicle-treated FMT. Proton pump inhibitors treatment altered the gut microbiota composition, indicating that PPI induced dysbiosis. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Under stressed conditions, PPI enhances intestinal permeability via dysbiosis of gut microbiota. Vasoactive intestinal peptide and mast cells are also implicated in the underlying mechanisms.

The study of intestinal absorption and biodistribution in vivo of proton pump inhibitors.

The major therapeutic strategy for acid-related gastrointestinal diseases in clinic is to reduce the excretion of gastric acid by oral administration of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, it is quite a challenge to study the oral absorption behaviors of PPIs considering their extreme instability under gastrointestinal environment. As a result, little information has been reported on PPI oral absorption so far, hindering the further development of PPI-contained oral preparations. Here, we first investigated the degradation rate of three representative PPIs, including ilaprazole, ilaprazole sodium and rabeprazole sodium. Then a modified in situ intestine absorption method in rat was established: through the temperature control by the heat exchangers, the perfusate was kept at physiological temperature only when passing through the intestine while it was maintained at 4 °C outside the intestine. Therefore PPIs could maintained sufficiently high stability under proper temperature control. Our data demonstrated that both ilaprazole and ilaprazole sodium exhibited significantly higher absorption efficiency than rabeprazole sodium did through the comparison of their apparent permeability coefficients and steady-state plasma concentrations after perfusion in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, mainly attributing to their more suitable oil-water partition coefficient. The duodenum could be the best site for the oral absorption of PPIs. Ilaprazole outperformed its sodium salt form with its stable absorption behavior in tested four intestinal segments. Furthermore, after intravenous or oral administration, ilaprazole exhibited a longer residence time and a higher accumulation in the stomach than in most of other tissues/organs. However, it was also found that the accumulation was heterogeneous and mainly located in mucosa cells of the stomach. Our further study indicated that there was no significant difference on the oral absorption efficiency of ilaprazole between female and male rats but ilaprazole underwent a faster metabolism in male rats after oral absorption. Our study provided a valuable guidance for the design of oral formulation and the optimization of PPI-contained formulations.

Randomised trial of acid inhibition by vonoprazan 10/20 mg once daily vs rabeprazole 10/20 mg twice daily in healthy Japanese volunteers (SAMURAI pH study).

BACKGROUND: Vonoprazan (V), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, has a more durable acid-inhibitory effect as compared with standard-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) but has not been compared with 2-4 times higher daily PPI doses administered in two divided doses. AIMS: To evaluate the acid-inhibitory effect of V 10/20 mg once-daily (OD; V10/V20) vs rabeprazole (R) 10/20 mg twice-daily (BID; R20/R40) in healthy Japanese volunteers. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, open-label, two-period, crossover study compared V10 or V20 vs R20, or V20 vs R40 using three cohorts of 10 healthy Japanese adults. Within each cohort, subjects were randomised to receive V or R for 7 days and, following a washout period ≥7 days, the other treatment for 7 days. On day 6 of each period, 24-hours multichannel gastric impedance-pH monitoring was performed. Percent times pH ≥ 3, ≥4 and ≥5 (pH 3, 4 and 5 holding time ratios [HTRs]) in 24 hours were evaluated as primary pharmacodynamic endpoints. RESULTS: Acid-inhibitory effect (24-hours pH 3 HTR) of V20 was greater than those of R20 (91.0% vs 65.3%; P = .0049) and R40 (98.5% vs 85.9%; P = .0073). Similar results were obtained for 24-hours pH 4 and 5 HTRs. V20 also achieved greater nocturnal pH 4 (91.5% vs 73.2%; P = .0319) and 5 HTRs (78.8% vs 62.2%; P = .0325) as compared with R40. One subject (20%) developed diarrhoea while receiving R40 which was considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 2-4 times the standard daily dose of R, V20 exerts a more potent and durable acid-inhibitory effect. Trial identifier: UMIN000022198 (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Influence of rabeprazole and famotidine on pharmacodynamic profile of dual antiplatelet therapy in clopidogrel-sensitive patients: The randomized, prospective, PROTECT trial.

Although acid suppressants are needed to attenuate gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), pharmacodynamic interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) can increase the risk of high platelet reactivity (HPR). We sought to evaluate serial changes of platelet measures and influence of rabeprazole on platelet measures. After 600-mg clopidogrel loading for elective PCI, clopidogrel-sensitive patients were recruited and randomly assigned to add rabeprazole of daily 20 mg (n = 40) or famotidine of daily 40 mg (n = 40). Platelet measures were performed with light transmittance aggregometry and VASP-P assay. Primary endpoint was 5 µM ADP-induced platelet aggregation (PA) at 30-day follow-up. HPR was defined as 5 µM ADP-induced PA > 46%. Baseline platelet measures did not differ significantly between the groups. The 30-day level of 5 µM ADP-induced PA was similar between the famotidine vs. rabeprazole group (30.0 ± 16.4% vs. 30.2 ± 13.9%, P= .956). In addition, other platelet measures were comparable between the groups. At 30-day follow-up, the incidence of HPR was similar between the famotidine and rabeprazole groups (20.5% vs. 15.4%; P= .555). In conclusion, adjunctive use of rabeprazole showed the similar antiplatelet effect even in clopidogrel-sensitive patients compared with adjunctive famotidine, which may support the similar effect of rabeprazole and famotidine on the antiplatelet effect of dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin.

Sequential Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Myanmar; a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and tolerability.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is little published research to examine the best approach to the management of Helicobacter pylori in Myanmar. This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy and tolerability of sequential eradication therapy compared to Myanmar's current recommendation of a concomitant four drug regimen. METHODS: Patients were screened for H. pylori using monoclonal Stool Antigen Testing (SAT). Those testing positive were randomized 1:1 to receive receive Myanmar's first-line regimen of 14 days of concomitant rabeprazole, clarithromycin, amoxycillin and tinidazole (140 pills, cost US$23) or 10 days of sequential rabeprazole, clarithromycin, amoxycillin and tinidazole (60 pills, cost US$10). Adherence and adverse effects were recorded, and the efficacy of the regimens assessed with repeat SAT. RESULTS: Of the 1011 patients screened for H. pylori infection, 313 (31%) tested positive. There was no statistical difference in the cure rates of the two regimens in either intention-to-treat: 128/157 (82%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 75-87%) receiving sequential therapy versus 123/156 (79%; 95% CI: 72-85%) receiving concomitant therapy (P = 0.55) or per-protocol analysis: 125/131 (95%; 95% CI: 90-98) receiving sequential therapy versus 121/130 (93%; 95% CI: 87-96) receiving concomitant therapy (P = 0.42). Side effects of therapy were reported in 54/157 (47%) patients taking sequential therapy compared with 62/156 (53%) taking concomitant therapy, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this high-burden, resource-poor setting, less expensive sequential therapy was as effective and as well tolerated as the currently recommended concomitant four drug regimen for eradication of H. pylori.

Bioequivalence of a Newly Developed Dabigatran Etexilate Tablet Versus the Commercial Capsule and Impact of Rabeprazole-Induced Elevated Gastric pH on Exposure in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Dabigatran etexilate (DE) is an anticoagulant with proven efficacy and tolerability for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For the commercial capsule, a complex formulation is used to maintain the acidic microenvironment required for maximal absorption. Consequently, its efficacy and safety are similar with or without concomitant intake of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). A simplified DE tablet formulation was developed and tested in two studies. One investigated bioequivalence (BE) of the novel DE tablet versus the commercial DE capsule. The other investigated DE bioavailability (BA) under pretreatment with the PPI rabeprazole and assessed the effect of elevated pH on exposure to dabigatran. METHODS: BE of the novel DE tablet versus the DE capsule was assessed in a randomized two-treatment, four-period, two-sequence crossover study (NCT03070171). The effect of rabeprazole on the BA of the DE tablet was assessed in an open-label, single-arm study (NCT03143166). Both studies were conducted at sites in Japan. Participants were healthy male volunteers, aged ≥ 20-40 years. In the BE study, participants received the DE tablet or capsule (single oral dose, 110 mg); primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from baseline to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of unconjugated dabigatran. In the relative BA study, participants received the DE tablet (single oral dose, 110 mg) with or without rabeprazole pretreatment (once daily for 5 days, 20 mg); primary endpoints were AUC0-tz and Cmax of total dabigatran. RESULTS: In total, 160 participants were randomized in the BE study; 36 participants were enrolled in the BA study. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean (gMean) ratios for AUC0-tz (101.4-116.0%) and Cmax (101.8-116.6%) of unconjugated dabigatran were within pre-defined acceptance criteria for BE. In the relative BA study, the gMeans of AUC0-tz (667 to 192 ng h/mL) and Cmax (83.1 to 21.8 ng/mL) were decreased by approximately 70% when the tablet was administered under rabeprazole pretreatment. The reduction in BA was observed at a mean gastric pH of 5.3. Treatment was well tolerated; no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or significant AEs were reported in either study. CONCLUSION: The DE tablet demonstrated BE to the capsule; however, at high gastric pH, BA of the tablet was reduced by approximately 70%, which may lead to reduced efficacy. Data indicate the importance of examining not only BE under standard conditions, but relative BA at elevated gastric pH. Such investigations may avoid the reduced BA at elevated pH that is quite common in the target population (the elderly and/or patients treated with gastric-acid modifying co-medications), and therefore reduce treatment failure with DE. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers: NCT03070171, and NCT03143166.

Gastric acid inhibitor aggravates indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury via reducing Lactobacillus johnsonii.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) alter the composition of the intestinal microbiome, exacerbating indomethacin (IND)-induced small intestinal damage. Vonoprazan fumarate inhibits gastric acid secretion using a different mechanism from PPIs. We investigated the effects of both drugs on the intestinal microbiome and IND-induced small intestinal damage. We sought to clarify whether PPI-induced dysbiosis and worsening of the damage were due to a specific drug class effect of PPIs. Rabeprazole administration increased operational taxonomic unit numbers in the small intestines of C57BL/6 J mice, whereas the difference was not significant in the vonoprazan-treated group but exhibited a trend. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance of the unweighted UniFrac distances showed significant differences between vehicle- and vonoprazan- or rabeprazole-treated groups. L. johnsonii was the predominant microbial species, and the population ratio decreased after vonoprazan and rabeprazole administration. The vonoprazan- and rabeprazole-treated groups showed increased IND-induced damage. This high sensitivity to IND-induced damage was evaluated by transplantation with contents from the small intestine of mice treated with either vonoprazan or rabeprazole. Supplementation of L. johnsonii orally in mice treated with rabeprazole and vonoprazan prevented the increase in IND-induced small intestinal damage. In conclusion, both rabeprazole and vonoprazan aggravated NSAID-induced small intestinal injury by reducing the population of L. johnsonii in the small intestine via suppressing gastric acid secretion.