A dosimetric comparison of brachytherapy sources for endometrial cancer: an electronic brachytherapy and an iridium-192 source with multichannel cylinders and a three-dimensional technique.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ir192 vaginal brachytherapy (IBT) is commonly used for patients with postoperative endometrial cancer (EC). We devised a novel multichannel vaginal applicator that could be equipped with an electronic brachytherapy (EBT) device. We aimed to explore the differences in physical parameters between the EBT and IBT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 20 EC patients who received adjuvant IBT from March 1, 2023, to May 1, 2023. Multichannel vaginal cylinders were used, and three-dimensional plans were generated. We designed an electronic multichannel vaginal applicator model and simulated a three-dimensional EBT plan. In order to ensure comparability, D90 of the CTV for the EBT plan was normalized to be equivalent to that of the IBT plan for the same patient. RESULTS: Twenty EBT plans were compared with 20 IBT plans. Results showed, the mean D90 value of clinical target volume (CTV) was 536.1 cGy for both treatment plans. For the mean dose of CTV, the EBT was significantly greater (738.3 vs. 684.3 cGy, p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in CTV coverage between the EBT and IBT plans. For high-dose areas (V200% and V150%), the EBTs were significantly greater. There were no significant differences in the maximum doses to the vaginal mucosa between the EBT and IBT, whether at the apex or in the middle segment. For the bladder and rectum, both the low-dose area and high-dose area were significantly lower in the EBT plans. For the conformity index, there was no significant difference between the EBT and IBT plans. For the dose homogeneity index, the EBT value was lower. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, under the premise of a three-dimensional brachytherapy plan, for patients receiving multichannel vaginal applicator brachytherapy, compared with IBT, EBT could reduce the dose to the surrounding organs at risk while maintaining the dose in the target area.

169Yb-based high dose rate intensity modulated brachytherapy for focal treatment of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study compares conventional 192Ir-based high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 169Yb-based HDR intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) for focal prostate cancer treatment. Additionally, the study explores the potential to generate less invasive treatment plans with IMBT by reducing the number of catheters needed to achieve acceptable outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective dosimetric study of ten prostate cancer patients initially treated with conventional 192Ir-based HDR-BT and 5-14 catheters was employed. RapidBrachyMCTPS, a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system was used to calculate and optimize dose distributions. For 169Yb-based HDR IMBT, a custom 169Yb source combined with 0.8 mm thick platinum shields placed inside 6F catheters was used. Furthermore, dose distributions were investigated when iteratively removing catheters for less invasive treatments. RESULTS: With IMBT, the urethra D10 and D0.1cc decreased on average by 15.89 and 15.65 percentage points (pp) and the rectum V75 and D2cc by 1.53 and 11.54 pp, respectively, compared to the conventional clinical plans. Similar trends were observed when the number of catheters decreased. On average, there was an observed increase in PTV V150 from 2.84 pp with IMBT when utilizing all catheters to 8.83 pp when four catheters were removed. PTV V200 increased from 0.42 to 2.96 pp on average. Hotspots in the body were however lower with IMBT compared to conventional clinical plans. CONCLUSIONS: 169Yb-based HDR IMBT for focal treatment of prostate cancer has the potential to successfully deliver clinically acceptable, less invasive treatment with reduced dose to organs at risk.

Clinical and toxicity outcomes with 3D based-HDR surface mold brachytherapy in skin cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Surface mold brachytherapy (SMBT) is an established treatment modality in skin cancer, especially in accessible areas, and has shown comparable outcomes to surgery. We have presented our results for the skin tumor treatment with SMBT treated with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in terms of clinical outcomes and toxicity at our institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 15 patients with skin cancer were treated with customized tube-based SMBT at our institute between January 2019 and July 2021. The patients were treated using HDR-brachytherapy using Iridium-192. The median dose was 40 Gy in 10 fractions. The dosimetric parameters were assessed, and patients were followed up as per the institutional protocol. All patients underwent individualized CT-based planning. Skin toxicity was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). RESULTS: With the majority of the patients being male, the median age was 59 years and the most common site affected was the face (8/15; 53.3%). Among the 15 cases, five were squamous cell carcinoma, nine were basal cell carcinoma, and a single case of sebaceous cell carcinoma. The median depth of invasion was 4 mm, and the median catheter-to-surface distance was 1 mm. The complete response rate among the 10 definitive cases was 90% and partial response in one case. The treatment was well-tolerated with no grade 3-5 toxicities. The median V95% and V90% were 94.8% and 97.1%, respectively. The mean coverage index (C.I.), dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR), and overdose volume index (ODI) were 0.97, 0.13, and 0.05, respectively. After a median follow-up of 12 months, none of the patients had recurrence. On assessment of DLQI, the scores were found to be significant in association with the tumor size and tumor site with scores favoring <2 cm and non-exposed area lesions. CONCLUSION: SMBT is a safe and effective treatment modality for skin tumors providing excellent response and cosmetic outcomes. It is well-tolerated and a non-invasive option for elderly patients with comorbidities and lesions in inoperable areas.

Investigations on the beam quality correction factor for ionization chambers in high-energy brachytherapy dosimetry.

Objective. To enhance the investigations on MC calculated beam quality correction factors of thimble ionization chambers from high-energy brachytherapy sources and to develop reliable reference conditions in source and detector setups in water.Approach. The response of five different ionization chambers from PTW-Freiburg and Standard Imaging was investigated for irradiation by a high dose rate Ir-192 Flexisource in water. For a setup in a Beamscan water phantom, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate correction factors for the chamber readings. After exact positioning of source and detector the absorbed dose rate at the TG-43 reference point at one centimeter nominal distance from the source was measured using these factors and compared to the specification of the calibration certificate. The Monte Carlo calculations were performed using the restricted cema formalism to gain further insight into the chamber response. Calculations were performed for the sensitive volume of the chambers, determined by the methods currently used in investigations of dosimetry in magnetic fields.Main results. Measured dose rates and values from the calibration certificate agreed within the combined uncertainty (k= 2) for all chambers except for one case in which the full air cavity was simulated. The chambers showed a distinct directional dependence. With the restricted cema formalism calculations it was possible to examine volume averaging and energy dependence of the perturbation factors contributing to the beam quality correction factor also differential in energy.Significance. This work determined beam quality correction factors to measure the absorbed dose rate from a brachytherapy source in terms of absorbed dose to water for a variety of ionization chambers. For the accurate dosimetry of brachytherapy sources with ionization chambers it is advisable to use correction factors based on the sensitive volume of the chambers and to take account for the directional dependence of chamber response.

A simple calibration routine for small inorganic scintillation detectors for in vivo dosimetry during brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is rarely performed in brachytherapy (BT), allowing potential dose misadministration to go unnoticed. This study presents a clinical routine-calibration method of detectors for IVD in high (HDR) and pulsed dose rate (PDR) Ir-192 BT. PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric precision and feasibility of an in-clinic calibration routine of detectors for IVD in afterloading BT. METHODS: Calibrations were performed in a PMMA phantom with two needles inserted 20 mm apart. The source was loaded in one of the needles at 15 dwells for 10 s. The detector was placed in the other needle, and its signal was recorded. The mean signal at each dwell position was fitted to the expected dose rate with the calibration factor and the detector's longitudinal position being free parameters. The method was tested with an inorganic scintillation detector using one Ir-192 FlexiSource HDR and two Ir-192 GammaMedPlus PDR sources and followed by validation measurements in water. RESULTS: The standard measurement uncertainty (k = 1) of the calibration factor in absolute terms (Gy/s) was 3.2/3.4% for the HDR/PDR source. The uncertainty was dominated by source strength uncertainty, and the precision of the method was <1%. The mean ± 1SD of the difference in measured and expected dose rate during validation was 1.5 ± 4.7% (HDR) and 0.0 ± 4.1% (PDR) with a positional uncertainty in the setup of 0.33/0.23 mm (HDR/PDR) (k = 1). CONCLUSION: A precise and feasible in-clinic calibration method for IVD and source strength consistency tests in BT was presented.

Dosimetry of Large Field Valencia applicators for Cobalt-60-based brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND: Non-melanoma skin cancer is one of the most common types of cancer and one of the main approaches is brachytherapy. For small lesions, the treatment of this cancer with brachytherapy can be done with two commercial applicators, one of these is the Large Field Valencia Applicators (LFVA). PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to test the capabilities of the LFVA to use clinically 60Co sources instead of the 192Ir ones. This study was designed for the same dwell positions and weights for both sources. METHODS: The Penelope Monte Carlo code was used to evaluate dose distribution in a water phantom when a 60Co source is considered. The LFVA design and the optimized dwell weights reported for the case of 192Ir are maintained with the only exception of the dwell weight of the central position, that was increased. 2D dose distributions, field flatness, symmetry and the leakage dose distribution around the applicator were calculated. RESULTS: When comparing the dose distributions of both sources, field flatness and symmetry remain unchanged. The only evident difference is an increase of the penumbra regions for all depths when using the 60Co source. Regarding leakage, the maximum dose within the air volume surrounding the applicator is in the order of 20% of the prescription dose for the 60Co source, but it decreases to less than 5% at about 1 cm distance. CONCLUSIONS: Flatness and symmetry remains unaltered as compared with 192Ir sources, while an increase in leakage has been observed. This proves the feasibility of using the LFVA in a larger range of clinical applications.

Calibration system correction factor for measuring the reference air kerma rate (RAKR) applied to high dose rate192Ir sources (HDR).

The aim of this study was to use computer simulation to analyze the impact of the aluminum fixing support on the Reference Air Kerma (RAK), a physical quantity obtained in a calibration system that was experimentally developed in the Laboratory of Radiological Sciences of the University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (LCR-UERJ). Correction factors due to scattered radiation and the geometry of the192Ir sources were also sought to be determined. The computational simulation was validated by comparing some parameters of the experimental results with the computational results. These parameters were: verification of the inverse square law of distance, determination of (RAKR), analysis of the source spectrum with and without encapsulation, and the sensitivity curve of the Sourcecheck 4PI ionization chamber response, as a function of the distance from the source along the axial axis, using the microSelectron-v2 (mSv2) and GammaMedplus (GMp) sources. Kerma was determined by activity in the Reference air, with calculated values of 1.725 × 10-3U. Bq-1and 1.710 × 10-3U. Bq-1for the ionization chamber NE 2571 and TN 30001, respectively. The expanded uncertainty for these values was 0.932% and 0.919%, respectively, for a coverage factor (k = 2). The correction factor due to the influence of the aluminum fixing support for measurements at 1 cm and 10 cm from the source was 0.978 and 0.969, respectively. The geometric correction factor of the sources was ksg= 1.005 with an expanded uncertainty of 0.7% for a coverage factor (k = 2). This value has a difference of approximately 0.2% compared to the experimental values.

High dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy source model Monte Carlo dosimetry: mHDR-v2 and mHDR-v2r.

After 2010, the source model of the microSelectron HDR Afterloader System was slightly modified from the previous model. Granero et al. named the modified source model "mHDR-v2r (revised model mHDR-v2)" and the previous model "mHDR-v2". They concluded that the dosimetric differences arising from the dimensional changes between the mHDR-v2 and mHDR-v2r designs were negligible at almost all locations (within 0.5% for r ≥ 0.25 cm), the two-dimensional anisotropy function difference between the two sources is found 2.1% at r = 1.0 cm when compared with the results of the other experimental group. To confirm this difference, we performed a full Monte Carlo simulation without energy-fluence approximation. This is useful near the radiation source where charged-particle equilibrium does not hold. The two-dimensional anisotropy function of the TG-43U1 dataset showed a few percent difference between the mHDR-v2r and mHDR-v2 sources. There was no agreement in the immediate vicinity of the source (0.10 cm and 0.25 cm), when compared to Granero et al. in mHDR-v2r sources. The differences in these two-dimensional anisotropy functions were identified.

The effect of vaginal cylinder inhomogeneity on the HDR brachytherapy dose calculations using Monte Carlo simulations.

PURPOSE: To analytically assess the heterogeneity effect of vaginal cylinders (VC) made of high-density plastics on dose calculations, considering the prescription point (surface or 5 mm beyond the surface), and benchmark the accuracy of a commercial model-based dose calculation (MBDC) algorithm using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The GEANT4 MC code was used to simulate a commercial 192 Ir HDR source and VC, with diameters ranging from 20 to 35 mm, inside a virtual water phantom. Standard plans were generated from a commercial treatment planning system [TPS-BrachyVision ACUROS (BV)] optimized for a treatment length of 5 cm through two dose calculation approaches: (1) assuming all the environment as water (i.e., Dw,w-MC & Dw,w-TG43 ) and (2) accounting for the heterogeneity of VC applicators (i.e., Dw,w-App-MC & Dw,w-App-MBDC ). The compared isodose lines, and dose & energy difference maps were extracted for analysis. In addition, the dose difference on the peripheral surface, along the applicator and at middle of treatment length, as well as apical tip was evaluated. RESULTS: The Dw,w-App-MC results indicated that the VC heterogeneity can cause a dose reduction of (up to) % 6.8 on average (for all sizes) on the peripheral surface, translating to 1 mm shrinkage of the isodose lines compared to Dw,w-MC . In addition, the results denoted that BV overestimates the dose on the peripheral surface and apical tip of about 3.7% and 17.9%, respectively, (i.e., Dw,w-App-MBDC vs Dw,w-App-MC ) when prescribing to the surface. However, the difference between the two were negligible at the prescription point when prescribing to 5 mm beyond the surface. CONCLUSION: The VCs' heterogeneity could cause dose reduction when prescribing dose to the surface of the applicator, and hence increases the level of uncertainty. Thus, reviewing the TG43 results, in addition to ACUROS, becomes prudent, when evaluating the surface coverage at the apex.

Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.

BACKGROUND: High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is commonly used to treat prostate cancer. Existing HDR planning systems solve the dwell time problem for predetermined catheters and a single energy source. PURPOSE: Additional degrees of freedom can be obtained by relaxing the catheters' pre-designation and introducing more source types, and may have a dosimetric benefit, particularly in improving conformality to spare the urethra. This study presents a novel analytical approach to solving the corresponding HDR planning problem. METHODS: The catheter and dual-energy source selection problem was formulated as a constrained optimization problem with a non-convex group sparsity regularization. The optimization problem was solved using the fast-iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (FISTA). Two isotopes were considered. The dose rates for the HDR 4140 Ytterbium (Yb-169) source and the Elekta Iridium (Ir-192) HDR Flexisource were modeled according to the TG-43U1 formalism and benchmarked accordingly. Twenty-two retrospective HDR prostate brachytherapy patients treated with Ir-192 were considered. An Ir-192 only (IRO), Yb-169 only (YBO), and dual-source (DS) plan with optimized catheter location was created for each patient with N catheters, where N is the number of catheters used in the clinically delivered plans. The DS plans jointly optimized Yb-169 and Ir-192 dwell times. All plans and the clinical plans were normalized to deliver a 15 Gy prescription (Rx) dose to 95% of the clinical treatment volume (CTV) and evaluated for the CTV D90%, V150%, and V200%, urethra D0.1cc and D1cc, bladder V75%, and rectum V75%. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for each structure. RESULTS: The DS plans ubiquitously selected Ir-192 as the only treatment source. IRO outperformed YBO in organ at risk (OARs) OAR sparing, reducing the urethra D0.1cc and D1cc by 0.98% ( p = 2.22 ∗ 10 - 9 $p\ = \ 2.22*{10^{ - 9}}$ ) and 1.09% ( p = 1.22 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 1.22*{10^{ - 10}}$ ) of the Rx dose, respectively, and reducing the bladder and rectum V75% by 0.09 ( p = 0.0023 $p\ = \ 0.0023$ ) and 0.13 cubic centimeters (cc) ( p = 0.033 $p\ = \ 0.033$ ), respectively. The YBO plans delivered a more homogenous dose to the CTV, with a smaller V150% and V200% by 3.20 ( p = 4.67 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 4.67*{10^{ - 10}}$ ) and 1.91 cc ( p = 5.79 ∗ 10 - 10 $p\ = \ 5.79*{10^{ - 10}}$ ), respectively, and a lower CTV D90% by 0.49% ( p = 0.0056 $p\ = \ 0.0056$ ) of the prescription dose. The IRO plans reduce the urethral D1cc by 2.82% ( p = 1.38 ∗ 10 - 4 $p\ = \ 1.38*{10^{ - 4}}$ ) of the Rx dose compared to the clinical plans, at the cost of increased bladder and rectal V75% by 0.57 ( p = 0.0022 $p\ = \ 0.0022$ ) and 0.21 cc ( p = 0.019 $p\ = \ 0.019$ ), respectively, and increased CTV V150% by a mean of 1.46 cc ( p = 0.010 $p\ = \ 0.010$ ) and CTV D90% by an average of 1.40% of the Rx dose ( p = 8.80 ∗ 10 - 8 $p\ = \ 8.80*{10^{ - 8}}$ ). While these differences are statistically significant, the clinical differences between the plans are minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed analytical HDR planning algorithm integrates catheter and isotope selection with dwell time optimization for varying clinical goals, including urethra sparing. The planning method can guide HDR implants and identify promising isotopes for specific HDR clinical goals, such as target conformality or OAR sparing.

Use of Thermoluminescence Dosimetry for QA in High-Dose-Rate Skin Surface Brachytherapy with Custom-Flap Applicator.

Surface brachytherapy (BT) lacks standard quality assurance (QA) protocols. Commercially available treatment planning systems (TPSs) are based on a dose calculation formalism that assumes the patient is made of water, resulting in potential deviations between planned and delivered doses. Here, a method for treatment plan verification for skin surface BT is reported. Chips of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used for dose point measurements. High-dose-rate treatments were simulated and delivered through a custom-flap applicator provided with four fixed catheters to guide the Iridium-192 (Ir-192) source by way of a remote afterloading system. A flat water-equivalent phantom was used to simulate patient skin. Elekta TPS Oncentra Brachy was used for planning. TLDs were calibrated to Ir-192 through an indirect method of linear interpolation between calibration factors (CFs) measured for 250 kV X-rays, Cesium-137, and Cobalt-60. Subsequently, plans were designed and delivered to test the reproducibility of the irradiation set-up and to make comparisons between planned and delivered dose. The obtained CF for Ir-192 was (4.96 ± 0.25) µC/Gy. Deviations between measured and TPS calculated doses for multi-catheter treatment configuration ranged from -8.4% to 13.3% with an average of 0.6%. TLDs could be included in clinical practice for QA in skin BT with a customized flap applicator.

Dose perturbation effects by metal hip prosthesis in gynaecological 192Ir HDR brachytherapy.

The present study was conducted to elucidate the effects of hip prostheses in 192Ir HDR brachytherapy and determine dose uncertainties introduced by the treatment planning. A gynaecological phantom irradiated using Nucletron 192Ir microSelectron HDR source was modeled using MCNP5 code. Three hip materials considered in this study were water, bone, and metal prosthesis. According to the obtained results, a dose perturbation was observed within the medium with a higher atomic number, which reduced the dose to the nearby region.

Efficacy of Nanoparticles in dose enhancement with high dose rate of Iridium-192 and Cobalt-60 radionuclide sources in the Treatment of Cancer: A systematic review.

ABSTRACTS: A key challenge in radiation therapy is to maximize the radiation dose to cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. In recent years, the introduction of remote after-loading technology such as high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy becomes the safest and more precise way of radiation delivery compared to classical low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. However, the axially symmetric dose distribution of HDR with single channel cylindrical applicator, the physical "dead-space" with multichannel applicators, and shielding material heterogeneities are the main challenges of HDR brachytherapy. Thus, this review aimed to quantitatively evaluate the dose enhancement factor (DEF) produced by high atomic number nanoparticles (NPs) which increases the interaction probability of photons mainly through the photoelectric effect induced in the great number of atoms contained in each nanoparticle. The NPs loaded to the target volume create a local intensification effect on the target tissue that allows imparting the prescribed therapeutic dose using lower fluxes of irradiation and spare the surrounding healthy tissues. An electronic database such as PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar was searched to retrieve the required articles. Unpublished articles were also reached by hand from available sources. The dose is increased using the high atomic number of nanoparticle elements under the high dose iridium radionuclide whereas the cobalt-60 radionuclide source did not. However, much work is required to determine the dose distribution outside the target organ or tumor to spare the surrounding healthy tissues for the iridium source and make compressive work to have more data for the cobalt source.

CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO PROGNOSTICATION AND MANAGEMENT OF PELVIC RADIATION INJURIES IN GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER PATIENTS. / SUChASNI PIDKhODY DO PROGNOZUVANNIa TA LIKUVANNIa PROMENEVYKh UShKODZhEN' ORGANIV MALOGO TAZU PISLIa RADIOTERAPIÏ KhVORYKh ONKOGINEKOLOGIChNOGO PROFILIu.

BACKGROUND: Rapid development of radiotherapeutic techniques and implementation of radiation therapy (RT) nanotechnologies in practice, taking into account principles of radiobiology, ensures that the planned dose will bedelivered to the target volume with minimal irradiation of healthy tissues while maintaining the guaranteed RTquality. Therefore, further advance of RT involves not only implementation of the new technologies in radiationpractice, but also the intensive developments in fields of radiation medicine and clinical radiobiology. OBJECTIVE: search for optimal models of the high-energy (HDR - high dose rate) brachytherapy (BT) using the 192Irsource in comparison with effects of the reference gamma radiation from 60Co, thereby, to increase the effectivenessof chemoradiation therapy (CRT) of gynecological cancer patients (GCPs) with minimal radiation loads on criticalorgans and tissues in the tumor environment. The radiobiological study was aimed to determine the feasibility ofusing the transmembrane potential (TMP) and intensity of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in peripheralblood lymphocytes (PBL) as predictors of radiosensitivity of non-malignant cells from the tumor environment or itsbed in order to minimize the RT complications in GCPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 115) with cancer stages II-III, T2-3N0-1M0 were managed with comprehensiveconservative treatment. Three groups of patients were selected depending on the applied HDR BT method against abackground of the administered chemosensitizing agents. Blood samples of GCPs (n = 24) before the RT initiationand of apparently healthy individuals (AHIs, i.e. the control group, n = 18) were taken for the radiobiologicalresearch. RESULTS: Review of the direct results of 60Co or 192Ir sources use in HDR BT and of the follow-up data showed theincreased tumor positive response in the main study groups after CRT course by respectively 16.6 % and 20.1 % incomparison with 60Со HDR BT administration. Concerning local reactions it was noted that grade II radiation reactions were almost absent in the main groups. According to the results of radiobiological studies, it was establishedthat TMP level in PBL of GCPs was 1.36 times higher than in AHIs. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the emerging of late radiation injuries depended on the accuracy of of individual computer planning and correct reproduction of the planned RT course, timely correction of treatment programs, use of a complexof rational medical prophylaxis, severity of tumor process and concomitant disorders, as well as on the used type ofHDR radiation sources (192Ir and 60Co). Changes in TMP values and intensity of ROS production in PBL of GCPs in comparison with AHIs, and the high values of these parameters in PBL of individual patients are a rationale to specifythem as additional indicators characterizing the possibility of radiation complications before the RT planning.

Radiobiological and dosimetric comparison of 60Co versus 192Ir high-dose-rate intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: High-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy (IC-ISBT) is an effective treatment for bulky, middle, and advanced cervical cancer. In this study, we compared the differences between 60Co and 192Ir HDR IC-ISBT plans in terms of radiobiological and dosimetric parameters, providing a reference for clinical workers in brachytherapy. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with cervical cancer receiving HDR IC-ISBT were included in this study, and IC-ISBT plans for each individual were designed with both 60Co and 192Ir at a prescribed dose of CTV D90 = 6 Gy while keeping the dose to OARs as low as possible. Physical dose and dose-volume parameters of CTV and OARs were extracted from TPS. The EQD2, EUBED, EUD, TCP, and NTCP were calculated using corresponding formulas. The differences between the 60Co and 192Ir IC-ISBT plans were compared using the paired t-test. RESULTS: In each patient's 60Co and 192Ir IC-ISBT plan, the average physical dose and EQD2 of 60Co were lower than those of 192Ir, and there were statistically significant differences in D2cc and D1cc for the OARs (p < 0.05); there were statistically significant differences in D0.1 cc for the bladder (p < 0.05) and no significant differences in D0.1 cc for the rectum or intestines (p > 0.05). The EUBED ratio (60Co/192Ir) at the CTV was mostly close to 1 when neither 60Co or 192Ir passed their half-lives or when both passed two half-lives, and the difference between them was not significant; at the OARs, the mean value of 60Co was lower than that of 192Ir. There was no statistical difference between 60Co and 192Ir in the EUD (93.93 versus 93.92 Gy, p > 0.05) and TCP (97.07% versus 97.08%, p > 0.05) of the tumors. The mean NTCP value of 60Co was lower than that of 192Ir. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the CTV and OARs, the dosimetric parameters of 60Co and 192Ir are comparable. Compared with 192Ir, the use of 60Co for HDR IC-ISBT can ensure a similar tumor control probability while providing better protection to the OARs. In addition, 60Co has obvious economic advantages and can be promoted as a good alternative to 192Ir.

Optimization of the energy window setting in Ir-192 source imaging for high-dose-rate brachytherapy using a YAP(Ce) gamma camera.

PURPOSE: Although real-time imaging of the high-activity iridium-192 (Ir-192) source position during high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using a high-energy gamma camera system is a promising approach, the energy window was not optimized for spatial resolution or scatter fraction. METHODS: By using a list-mode data-acquisition system that can acquire energy information of a cerium-doped yttrium aluminum perovskite (YA1O3: YAP(Ce)) gamma camera, we tried to optimize the energy window's setting to improve the spatial resolution and reduce scatter fraction. RESULTS: The spatial resolution was highest for the central energy of the window at ∼300 keV. The scatter fraction was also smallest for the central energy of the window at ∼300 keV, and the scatter fraction was more than 48 % smaller than that for the full energy window. CONCLUSIONS: We clarified that the spatial resolution can be improved and the scatter fraction can be reduced through optimizing the energy window of the YAP(Ce) gamma camera by setting the central energy of the window to ∼300 keV for HDR brachytherapy.

Technical note: Short-time sequential high-energy gamma photon imaging using list-mode data acquisition system for high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Measurement of the dwell time and moving speed of a high-activity iridium-192 (Ir-192) source used for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is important for estimating the precise dose delivery to a tumor. For this purpose, we used a cerium-doped yttrium aluminum perovskite (YA1O3 :YAP(Ce)) gamma camera system, combined with a list-mode data acquisition system that can acquire short-time sequential images, and measured the dwell times and moving speeds of the Ir-192 source. METHODS: Gamma photon imaging was conducted using the gamma camera in list mode for the Ir-192 source of HDR brachytherapy with fixed dwell times and positions. The acquired list-mode images were sorted to millisecond-order interval time sequential images to evaluate the dwell time at each position. Time count rate curves were derived to calculate the dwell time at each source position and moving speed of the source. RESULTS: We could measure the millisecond-order time sequential images for the Ir-192 source. The measured times for the preset dwell times of 2 s and 10 s were 1.98 to 2.00 s full width at half maximum (FWHM) and 10.0 s FWHM, respectively. The dwell times at the first dwell position were larger than those at other positions. We also measured the moving speeds of the source after the dwells while moving back to the afterloader and found the speed increased with the distance from the edge of the field of view to the last dwell position. CONCLUSION: We conclude that millisecond-order time sequential imaging of the Ir-192 source is possible by using a gamma camera and is useful for evaluating the dwell times and moving speeds of the Ir-192 source.

The inverse square law: A basic principle in brachytherapy.

The purpose of this article is to remind the importance of the inverse square law in radiotherapy and especially in brachytherapy. Indeed, beyond the impact in radiation therapy with high energy beam, there is the use of radionuclides and low energy photons with short FSD where it is still more important. Comparisons between Iridium Brachytherapy and low energy X-rays brachytherapy show equivalent dose distributions in the first few centimeters. If the inverse square law is not the only element influencing the dose distributions calculations, it must not be forgotten. And it is playing a major role in brachytherapy with short FSD (<6cm).

Investigation the effect of a magnetic field on the dose distribution of I-125, Ir-192, Yb-169, and Co-60 brachytherapy sources by Monte Carlo simulation.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during brachytherapy may alter the dose distribution of radioactive sources implanted in the tumor. This study investigates the impact of a magnetic field of 1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T strengths on the dose distribution of high dose rate Co-60, Ir-192, and Yb-169, and low dose rate I-125 sources, using Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit. After validating the simulation results by calculating the AAPM-TG43 dosimetric parameters, seven sources of each radioisotope were simulated in a water phantom, and their dose distributions were compared under the influence of a magnetic field. The simulation results indicate that using Co-60 brachytherapy under the MRI guidance is not recommended. Furthermore, the impact of a magnetic field of up to 7 T strength on the dose distribution of Ir-192, Yb-169, and I-125 sources is negligible, provided that there is no air pocket near brachytherapy sources.

Comparing Iridium-192 with Cobalt-60 sources in high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Dosimetric and clinical comparison of two cohorts of Iridium-192 (Ir-192) and Cobalt-60 (Co-60) high-dose-rate brachytherapy (DR-BT) boost for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with localized prostate cancer receiving either Ir-192 or Co-60 high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the period of 2002-2019 were evaluated for dosimetric differences, side effects, biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). EBRT, delivered in 46 Gy (DMean) in conventional fractionation, was followed by two fractions HDR-BT boost with 9 Gy (D90%) 2 and 4 weeks after EBRT. Genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were evaluated utilizing the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix definition. RESULTS: A total of 338 patients with a median follow-up of 101.8 (IQR 65.7-143.0) months were evaluated. At 10 years the estimated bRFS, MFS, and OS in our patient sample were 81.1%/71.2% (p=.073), 87.0%/85.7% (p=.862), and 70.1%/69.7% (p=.998) for Ir-192/Co-60, respectively. Cumulative 5-year late grade ≥2 GU toxicity was 20% for Ir-192 and 18.3% for Co-60 (p=.771). Cumulative 5-year late grade ≥2 GI toxicity was 5.8% for Ir-192 and 4.6% for Co-60 (p=.610). Grade 3 late GU side effects were pronounced in the Ir-192 cohort with 8.1% versus 1.4% in the Co-60 cohort (p=.01), which was associated with significantly lower dose to the organs at risk in the Co-60 cohort. PTV D90% was 9.3 ± 0.8 Gy versus 9.0 ± 1.1 Gy (p=.027) for Ir-192 versus Co-60. PTV V100% and PTV V150% were not significantly different between both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Co-60 brachytherapy sources are an effective alternative to Ir-192 in combined prostate HDR-BT boost + EBRT.