Evaluation of the AV7909 Anthrax Vaccine Toxicity in Sprague Dawley Rats Following Three Intramuscular Administrations.

AV7909 is a next-generation anthrax vaccine under development for post-exposure prophylaxis following suspected or confirmed Bacillus anthracis exposure, when administered in conjunction with the recommended antibacterial regimen. AV7909 consists of the FDA-approved BioThrax® vaccine (anthrax vaccine adsorbed) and an immunostimulatory Toll-like receptor 9 agonist oligodeoxynucleotide adjuvant, CPG 7909. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential systemic and local toxicity of AV7909 when administered via repeat intramuscular injection to the right thigh muscle (biceps femoris) to male and female Sprague Dawley rats. The vaccine was administered on Days 1, 15, and 29 and the animals were assessed for treatment-related effects followed by a 2-week recovery period to evaluate the persistence or reversibility of any toxic effects. The AV7909 vaccine produced no apparent systemic toxicity based on evaluation of clinical observations, body weights, body temperature, clinical pathology, and anatomic pathology. Necrosis and inflammation were observed at the injection sites as well as in regional lymph nodes and adjacent tissues and were consistent with immune stimulation. Antibodies against B. anthracis protective antigen (PA) were detected in rats treated with the AV7909 vaccine, confirming relevance of this animal model for the assessment of systemic toxicity of AV7909. In contrast, sera of rats that received saline or soluble CPG 7909 alone were negative for anti-PA antibodies. Overall, 3 intramuscular immunizations of Sprague Dawley rats with AV7909 were well tolerated, did not induce mortality or any systemic adverse effects, and did not result in any delayed toxicity.

Delayed Localized Hypersensitivity Reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Series.

Importance: In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 2 mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2020. Some patients in the US have developed delayed localized cutaneous vaccine reactions that have been dubbed "COVID arm." Objective: To describe the course of localized cutaneous injection-site reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, subsequent reactions to the second vaccine dose, and to characterize the findings of histopathologic examination of the reaction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective case series study was performed at Yale New Haven Hospital, a tertiary medical center in New Haven, Connecticut, with 16 patients referred with localized cutaneous injection-site reactions from January 20 through February 12, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: We collected each patient's demographic information, a brief relevant medical history, clinical course, and treatment (if any); and considered the findings of a histopathologic examination of 1 skin biopsy specimen. Results: Of 16 patients (median [range] age, 38 [25-89] years; 13 [81%] women), 14 patients self-identified as White and 2 as Asian. The delayed localized cutaneous reactions developed in a median (range) of 7 (2-12) days after receiving the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. These reactions occurred at or near the injection site and were described as pruritic, painful, and edematous pink plaques. None of the participants had received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Results of a skin biopsy specimen demonstrated a mild predominantly perivascular mixed infiltrate with lymphocytes and eosinophils, consistent with a dermal hypersensitivity reaction. Of participants who had a reaction to first vaccine dose (15 of 16 patients), most (11 patients) developed a similar localized injection-site reaction to the second vaccine dose; most (10 patients) also developed the second reaction sooner as compared with the first-dose reaction. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinical and histopathologic findings of this case series study indicate that the localized injection-site reactions to the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine are a delayed hypersensitivity reaction. These reactions may occur sooner after the second dose, but they are self-limited and not associated with serious vaccine adverse effects. In contrast to immediate hypersensitivity reactions (eg, anaphylaxis, urticaria), these delayed reactions (dubbed "COVID arm") are not a contraindication to subsequent vaccination.

Injection site vaccinology of a recombinant vaccinia-based vector reveals diverse innate immune signatures.

Poxvirus systems have been extensively used as vaccine vectors. Herein a RNA-Seq analysis of intramuscular injection sites provided detailed insights into host innate immune responses, as well as expression of vector and recombinant immunogen genes, after vaccination with a new multiplication defective, vaccinia-based vector, Sementis Copenhagen Vector. Chikungunya and Zika virus immunogen mRNA and protein expression was associated with necrosing skeletal muscle cells surrounded by mixed cellular infiltrates. The multiple adjuvant signatures at 12 hours post-vaccination were dominated by TLR3, 4 and 9, STING, MAVS, PKR and the inflammasome. Th1 cytokine signatures were dominated by IFNγ, TNF and IL1ß, and chemokine signatures by CCL5 and CXCL12. Multiple signatures associated with dendritic cell stimulation were evident. By day seven, vaccine transcripts were absent, and cell death, neutrophil, macrophage and inflammation annotations had abated. No compelling arthritis signatures were identified. Such injection site vaccinology approaches should inform refinements in poxvirus-based vector design.

MRGPRX2 sensing of cationic compounds-A bridge between nociception and skin diseases?

Mast cells are innate immune cells located at many barrier sites in the body and known to protect the host against environmental threats and to be involved in allergic diseases. More recently, new studies have investigated their roles in the regulation of skin inflammation and transmission of pain and itch sensations. Mast cell signalling through the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor (MRGPR) X2 or its mouse orthologue MRGPRB2 has been reported to be one of the major mechanism by which mast cell can regulate such processes. MRGPRX2 and MRGPRB2 can induce mast cell degranulation upon binding to a broad panel of cationic molecules such as neuropeptides, bacteria-derived quorum sensing molecules, venom peptides, host defense peptides and, unfortunately, various FDA-approved drugs. Upon activation, mast cells release granule-associated proteases, lipids and multiple cytokines that can modulate vascular permeability, immune cells recruitment and activation status of tissue-projecting nociceptive sensory neurons (ie nociceptors). Here, we discuss the modality of MRGPRX2-dependent mast cell activation and its different consequences on the patterns of skin inflammation and associated diseases. We notably emphasize how MRGPRX2-dependent skin mast cell activation might trigger various pathological traits such as pruritus, pain and inflammation and therefore become a potential therapeutic target for inflammatory pain, itch, atopic dermatitis and drugs-induced injection site reactions.

The Interaction of Innate and Adaptive Immunity and Stabilization of Mast Cell Activation in Management of Infusion Related Reactions in Patients with Fabry Disease.

Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal disorder caused by mutations in GLA gene resulting in lack of or faulty α-galactosidase A (α-GalA) enzyme. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human α-GalA enzyme (agalsidase) is the standard treatment option for FD. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs), with symptoms ranging from rigors, to fever, pain, vomiting, angioedema and diarrhea, are often seen due to immune response against the exogenous enzyme. To elucidate the mechanisms causing the IRRs in FD, eight patients who developed IRRs were investigated. All, except one, tested negative for agalsidase-specific IgE and had normal tryptase levels. Circulating dendritic cells were drastically reduced during IRRs, suggesting possible sequestration to the sites of inflammation. An increase in NK cells and a decrease in T cells were also observed. Cytokines IL-4, IL-8 and TNF-α showed a significant increase, indicating nonspecific degranulation of mast cells. All IRRs were managed successfully using a combination of standard premedications and mast cell stabilizers without any interruption of therapy. Taken together, the results indicate crosstalk between immune cells resulting in IgE-independent mast-cell-specific allergic inflammation. Mast cell stabilizers could be used to control IRRs and for safe reintroduction of agalsidase in patients previously treated with ERT.

Low Eosinophil Percentages as a New Predictive Marker for Infusion Reactions Due to Trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Infusion reactions (IRs) often occur with trastuzumab. Although premedication by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be effective to a certain extent, IRs are still common and infrequently severe. Therefore, a predictive marker that can select patients requiring further prophylaxis is useful for appropriate prevention, but remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis for 136 consecutive female inpatients aged 18 years and older who received 8 mg/kg of the initial trastuzumab administration for breast cancer with a 25-mg dose of rectal diclofenac before trastuzumab infusion between May 2007 and April 2019, in order to assess IRs. RESULTS: Overall, 57 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. IRs were observed in 17.5% (10/57) of the patients. Univariate analysis showed that patients with a low eosinophil percentage (≤2%) were associated with IRs (p=0.016). CONCLUSION: A low eosinophil percentage can be a useful new predictive marker for trastuzumab-induced IRs in patients with breast cancer.

Dupilumab Provides Favorable Safety and Sustained Efficacy for up to 3 Years in an Open-Label Study of Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) commonly requires long-term treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the safety and efficacy of dupilumab treatment for up to 3 years in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: This ongoing, multicenter, open-label extension study (LIBERTY AD OLE; NCT01949311) assessed dupilumab treatment in adults previously enrolled in dupilumab trials. Patients received dupilumab 300 mg weekly up to 148 weeks. The primary outcome was safety. RESULTS: Of 2677 patients enrolled and treated, 347 reached week 148. Mean self-reported drug compliance was 98.2%. Safety data were consistent with previously reported trials (270.1 adverse events [AEs]/100 patient-years; 6.9 serious AEs/100 patient-years) and the known dupilumab safety profile. Common AEs (≥ 5% of patients) included nasopharyngitis, AD, upper respiratory tract infection, conjunctivitis, headache, oral herpes, and injection-site reactions. AD signs and symptoms showed sustained improvements during treatment with mean (standard deviation, mean percentage change from parent study baseline) Eczema Area and Severity Index 1.4 (3.2, - 95.4%) and weekly Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale 2.2 (1.8, - 65.4%) at week 148. LIMITATIONS: No control arm; fewer patients at later time points; regimen different from the approved 300 mg every 2 weeks dose. CONCLUSION: These safety and efficacy results support dupilumab as a continuous long-term treatment for adults with moderate-to-severe AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949311. Dupilumab provides favorable safety and sustained efficacy for up to 3 years in an open-label study of adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (MP4  139831 kb).

Immunogenicity and safety of a DTaP-IPV/Hib pentavalent vaccine given as primary and booster vaccinations in healthy infants and toddlers in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Globally, the use of single DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccines that combine DTaP-IPV and Hib is widespread, but in Japan vaccination is usually concomitant at separate sites. The immunogenicity and safety of a primary vaccination series and booster of a combined pentavalent DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccine were evaluated and compared to separate administration of DTaP-IPV and Hib in Japanese infants. METHODS: Healthy Japanese infants were administered DTaP-IPV/Hib (Group A: N = 207) or DTaP-IPV + Hib (Group B: N = 207) by the subcutaneous (SC) or DTaP-IPV/Hib by the intramuscular (IM) route (Group C: N = 10). All subjects received a 3-dose primary vaccination series and a booster. Non-inferiority (Group A versus Group B) was tested post-primary series and subsequent post hoc analyses were performed for anti-Hib. Safety was assessed by parental reports. RESULTS: Non-inferiority for SC administration of Group A versus Group B for the primary series was demonstrated for antibody responses to all antigens except Hib using the threshold of 1.0 µg/mL. Post hoc analyses for anti-Hib demonstrated non-inferiority for the primary series response using 0.15 µg/mL, and for pre-booster antibody persistence and the booster response using 0.15 µg/mL and 1.0 µg/mL. The immune response was similar for each antigen following SC or IM administration. There were no safety concerns in any group, and a lower incidence of injection sites for the IM route was observed as expected. CONCLUSIONS: These data show the good immunogenicity and safety profile of the DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccine as a 3-dose infant primary series followed by a booster in the second year of life in Japan.

Immunostimulatory effects on THP-1 cells by peptide or protein pharmaceuticals associated with injection site reactions.

Injection site reaction (ISR) is a common side-effect associated with the use of peptide or protein pharmaceuticals. These types of pharmaceuticals-induced activation of antigen-presenting cells is assumed to be a key step in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated ISR. The present study was designed to evaluate the immunostimulatory properties of peptide or protein pharmaceuticals using human monocytic THP-1 cells. Here, THP-1 cells, with or without phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) pretreatment, were exposed to enfuvirtide and glatiramer acetate (positive controls) or evolocumab (negative control) for 6 or 24 h. PMA treatment differentiated non-adherent monocytic THP-1 (nTHP-1) cells into adherent macrophagic THP-1 (pTHP-1) cells that highly express CD11b and CD36. Enfuvirtide increased the release of cytokines, e.g. TNFα, MIP-1ß, and MCP-1, and expression of CD86 and CD54 on nTHP-1 cells at 24 h. Similar immunostimulatory properties of glatiramer acetate were observed both in the nTHP-1 and pTHP-1 cells at 6 h, but the responses were very weak in the pTHP-1 cells. Evolocumab did not affect cytokine secretion or cell surface marker expression in either cell type. Taken together, these in vitro THP-1 cell assays revealed the immunostimulatory properties of enfuvirtide and glatiramer acetate. This assay platform thus could serve as a powerful tool in evaluating potential immune-related ISR risks of peptide or protein pharmaceuticals in humans.

Cutaneous adverse events induced by azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndrome patients: Case reports and a lesson from published work review.

Subcutaneous injection of azacitidine (AZA) is an important treatment option for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), which improves overall survival. In hematology, the incidence of AZA-induced cutaneous adverse events (AE) has been known to be relatively high, which has not been well recognized by dermatologists. Discontinuation of AZA can result in the deterioration of MDS disease activity. Therefore, on dermatological consultation, precise evaluation of AE severity and careful consideration is required for post-AE medication management. To enhance our understanding of AZA-induced cutaneous AE, we report four cases with two representative cutaneous AE subtypes and summarize the clinicopathological phenotypes and courses of the cases in the published work. Case 1, a 71-year-old man, developed neutrophilic dermatosis involving the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. The other three cases, a 75-year-old man, a 78-year-old woman and a 68-year-old man, presented injection-site erythema associated with flare-up reaction. Discontinuation of AZA was necessary for case 1 alone. The published work review delineated three major subtypes of AZA-induced cutaneous AE: systemic cutaneous reaction, neutrophilic dermatosis type and erythematous type injection-site reaction. Histologically, the first two subtypes are mostly characterized by neutrophil infiltration, while the third subtype presents lymphocytic cell infiltration. Neither AZA discontinuation nor intensive interventions were required for the erythematous type injection-site reaction, while AZA termination or systemic treatments, represented by corticosteroid administration, were preferentially conducted for the systemic cutaneous reaction or the neutrophilic dermatosis type injection-site reaction subgroup. These observations support the necessity of subtype-dependent treatment strategies for the management of AZA-induced cutaneous AE.

Immunogenicity and skin clearance recapture in clinical studies of brodalumab.

BACKGROUND: Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) may change pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic profiles of biologic therapies, potentially decreasing efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential effects of brodalumab immunogenicity on safety, efficacy, and retreatment. METHODS: Data from 1 phase 2 and 3 phase 3 studies of brodalumab in psoriasis were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 2.7% of patients had positive test results for binding ADAs after receiving brodalumab; ADAs were transient in 1.4% of patients, and there were no neutralizing ADAs. Among ADA-positive patients, 60.0% (3/5) achieved a static physician's global assessment score of 0 or 1 at week 12 in the group receiving the brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks, compared with 79.1% (1131/1429) of ADA-negative patients. All patients (100%) who experienced return of disease and were retreated with brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks (none were ADA positive) achieved at least a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area And Severity Index, ≥90% of whom regained response by week 8 of retreatment. Hypersensitivity reactions were less frequent with brodalumab than with placebo. Injection site reactions occurred in 1.8% of patients treated with brodalumab versus 2% of patients treated with ustekinumab. LIMITATIONS: Retreatment could be assessed in only 1 phase 3 brodalumab study. CONCLUSION: Brodalumab compares favorably with other biologics in terms of immunogenicity and high rates of efficacy recapture upon retreatment.

Tissue Response to Subcutaneous Infusion Catheter.

Insulin infusion pump, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and insulin infusion set (IIS) have been developed to be increasingly feasible for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Several recently approved CGMs are transitioning from 7-day to 10-day wear time without the need for fingerprick recalibration. Nevertheless, studies and improvements on IIS, a critical part of insulin pump therapy, have been limited. In particular, the recommended wear time of IIS is still 2-3 days, which can hardly match the current duration of CGM for potential closed-loop system development. It is generally believed that both the inserted catheter and the subsequent infused insulin drug could induce particular subcutaneous tissue response and skin-related complications at the infusion site. In certain cases, poor glycaemic control, increased risk of hypoglycemia, and serious cosmetic impact on people with diabetes were observed. Skin complication has also been attributed as an important factor resulting users to discontinue insulin pump therapy. This article provides the rare systematic review of IIS induced subcutaneous tissue responses and skin complications, including the impacts from the inserted catheters, the subcutaneous infused insulin, and the adhesive or tape used to immobilize the catheter. The FDA's recommendation for the frequency of IIS change was further discussed. Future studies on this topic are required to further understand the IIS-related problems, and future strategies could be developed accordingly to significantly reduce the incidence of these problems, extend the wear time, and increase the acceptance of insulin pump based therapy.

Impact of Precipitation of Antibody Therapeutics After Subcutaneous Injection on Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity.

Antibody therapeutics with poor solubility in the subcutaneous matrix may carry unintended risks when administered to patients. The objective of this work was to estimate the risk of antibodies that precipitate in vitro at neutral pH by determining the impact of poor solubility on distribution of the drug from the injection site as well as immunogenicity in vivo. Using fluorescence imaging in a mouse model, we show that one such precipitation-prone antibody is retained at the injection site in the subcutaneous space longer than a control antibody. In addition, we demonstrate that retention at the injection site through aggregation is concentration-dependent and leads to macrophage association and germinal center localization. Although there was delayed disposition of the aggregated antibody to draining lymph nodes, no overall impact on the immune response in lymph nodes, systemic exposure of the antibody, or enhancement of the anti-drug antibody response was evident. Unexpectedly, retention of the precipitated antibody in the subcutaneous space delayed the onset of the immune response and led to an immune suppressive response. Thus, we conclude that precipitation due to poor solubility of high doses of antibody formulations delivered subcutaneously may not be of special concern in terms of exposure or immunogenicity.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Safety and Immunogenicity of Revaccination With Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Tdap) in Adults 10 Years After a Previous Dose.

BACKGROUND: Reduced-antigen-content tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is recommended in many countries for boosting immunity in adolescents and adults. Although immunity to these antigens wanes with time, currently available Tdap products are not labeled for repeat administration in the United States. METHODS: We performed an observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial in 1330 adults aged 18 to <65 years who received either the Tdap (n = 1002) or tetanus-diphtheria (Td) (n = 328) vaccine 8 to 12 years after a dose of Tdap vaccine administered previously. Solicited adverse events following immunization were documented for 7 days after vaccination, and serious adverse events and adverse events of medical significance were documented for 6 months after vaccination. Levels of antibodies against component vaccine antigens were measured before and 1 month after vaccination. RESULTS: A solicited adverse event was reported by 87.7% of Tdap and 88.0% of Td vaccine recipients. We found no significant differences in the rates of injection-site reactions, systemic reactions, or serious adverse events between the vaccine groups. A robust antibody response to each pertussis antigen in the Tdap-vaccinated group was found; postvaccination-to-prevaccination geometric mean antibody concentration ratios were 8:1 (pertussis toxoid), 5.9 (filamentous hemagglutinin), 6.4 (pertactin), and 5.2 (fimbriae 2 and 3). Postvaccination geometric mean concentrations of tetanus antibody (4.20 and 4.74 IU/mL, respectively) and diphtheria antibody (10.1 and 12.6 IU/mL, respectively) were similar in the Tdap and Td groups, and the rates of seroprotection against tetanus and diphtheria were >99% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A second dose of Tdap vaccine in adults approximately 10 years after a previous dose was well tolerated and immunogenic. These data might facilitate consideration of providing Tdap booster doses to adults.

A post hoc analysis utilizing the FDA toxicity grading scale to assess injection site adverse events following immunization with the live attenuated Zoster Vaccine (ZVL).

BACKGROUND: ZOSTAVAX (ZVL; Zoster Virus Live), is a single dose, live, attenuated vaccine licensed for the prevention of herpes zoster (HZ) and post herpetic neuralgia (PHN) in adults ≥50 years of age. Injection site adverse events (AEs) of erythema, swelling and pain were solicited within 5 days post vaccination in the 2 pivotal studies of ZVL; ZEST (ZOSTAVAX Efficacy and Safety Trial) and SPS (Shingles Prevention Study). Protocol specified criteria were used to report the frequency and intensity of injection site AEs in ZEST and SPS studies. Subsequently, the FDA Toxicity Grading Scale provided guidance for uniform assessment of AEs across all adult vaccine clinical trials. The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to categorize the previously reported injection site AEs in two pivotal trials of ZVL according to the current FDA Toxicity Grading Scale. METHODS: The current FDA Toxicity Grading Scale provides a measure for classifying injection site AEs by four grades [Grade 1 (mild); Grade 2 (moderate); Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (life threatening)]. Injection site erythema, swelling, and pain intensity gradings were assigned to the respective FDA Toxicity Grade based on this appropriation. A descriptive analysis of the proportion and risk difference (within 95% confidence intervals) of injection site AEs per the FDA Toxicity Grading Scale is provided. RESULTS: The frequency of injection site AEs (erythema, swelling, pain) after subcutaneous vaccination with ZVL were higher in recipients of ZVL compared with placebo. Majority of the injection site AEs observed were Grade 1 (mild) or Grade 2 (moderate) in intensity. Additionally, Grade 3 (severe) injection site AEs were observed infrequently. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the FDA Toxicity Grading Scale provides a uniform AE assessment tool across different adult vaccines. This post hoc summary of injection site AEs using FDA Toxicity Grading Scale provides further evidence of low frequency of severe injection site AEs post ZVL vaccination.

Lymphoma Risk and Overall Safety Profile of Adalimumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease With up to 6 Years of Follow-Up in the Pyramid Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Real-world, prospective, long-term studies in Crohn's disease (CD) characterizing adalimumab safety data and lymphoma risk were lacking. We present the final results from the PYRAMID registry, which was designed to rule out a doubling of lymphoma risk in adalimumab-treated patients with CD. METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active CD newly prescribed or currently receiving adalimumab according to local product labels were followed for up to 6 years and analyzed for adverse events (AEs). The registry exposure-adjusted observed rate of lymphoma was compared with the estimated background lymphoma rate from a sex-matched general population in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 17 Registry database adjusted for anticipated prior or concurrent thiopurine use in a CD population. RESULTS: A total of 5025 patients were evaluated (16680.4 PY of adalimumab registry exposure, ≈3 years/patient mean follow-up). Registry treatment-emergent AEs included 4129 serious AEs (n = 1853 [36.9%]; 24.8 E/100 PY), 792 serious infections (n = 556 [11.1%]; 4.7 E/100 PY), and 134 malignancies (n = 116 [2.3%]; 0.8 E/100 PY), including ten lymphomas. The observed lymphoma rate (0.060 E/100 PY) was lower than the estimated background rate (0.084 E/100 PY), and the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CI of the observed rate (0.102 E/100 PY) was lower than double the estimated rate (0.168 E/100 PY). CONCLUSIONS: PYRAMID is the longest prospective adalimumab study in routine clinical practice, with up to 6 years of follow-up. No new safety signals were reported. The pre-specified registry objective of ruling out a doubling of lymphoma risk with adalimumab was met.

Immunogenicity and safety of a second dose of a measles-mumps-rubella vaccine administered to healthy participants 7 years of age or older: A phase III, randomized study.

The introduction of vaccination programs against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) led to significant global reduction in morbidity and mortality from these diseases. The currently recommended MMR vaccination schedule in the United States of America comprises 2 vaccine doses typically administered at 12-15 months and 4-6 years, respectively. Considering recent outbreaks in the USA, catch-up vaccination with an additional dose of MMR vaccine could contribute to outbreak control and community protection. This phase III, observer-blind, randomized controlled trial (NCT02058563) assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a dose of the MMR-RIT vaccine (Priorix, GSK) compared to MMR II vaccine (control; M-M-R II, Merck&Co Inc.) in ≥7-year-olds who had received ≥1 previous dose of MMR vaccine. We assessed anti-measles, anti-mumps, and anti-rubella antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs; primary endpoint) and seroresponse rates (SRRs) at day 42 post-vaccination. Solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The according-to-protocol cohort for immunogenicity included 869 participants (MMR-RIT: N = 433; MMR II: N = 436). We observed anti-measles, anti-mumps, and anti-rubella antibody GMCs of 1790.2 mIU/mL, 113.5 EU/mL, and 76.1 IU/mL, respectively, and SRRs of 98.8%, 98.4%, and 99.5%, respectively, after a dose of MMR-RIT; non-inferiority compared to MMR II was demonstrated. Both vaccines showed comparable reactogenicity profiles; the most common solicited AEs were injection site redness and pain, and fever (MMR-RIT: 12.2%, 11.8%, and 3.0%; MMR II: 11.7%, 11.5%, and 5.2%, respectively). The dose of MMR-RIT induced robust immune responses that were not inferior to those of MMR II, and was well tolerated.