The allergy mediator histamine confers resistance to immunotherapy in cancer patients via activation of the macrophage histamine receptor H1.

Reinvigoration of antitumor immunity remains an unmet challenge. Our retrospective analyses revealed that cancer patients who took antihistamines during immunotherapy treatment had significantly improved survival. We uncovered that histamine and histamine receptor H1 (HRH1) are frequently increased in the tumor microenvironment and induce T cell dysfunction. Mechanistically, HRH1-activated macrophages polarize toward an M2-like immunosuppressive phenotype with increased expression of the immune checkpoint VISTA, rendering T cells dysfunctional. HRH1 knockout or antihistamine treatment reverted macrophage immunosuppression, revitalized T cell cytotoxic function, and restored immunotherapy response. Allergy, via the histamine-HRH1 axis, facilitated tumor growth and induced immunotherapy resistance in mice and humans. Importantly, cancer patients with low plasma histamine levels had a more than tripled objective response rate to anti-PD-1 treatment compared with patients with high plasma histamine. Altogether, pre-existing allergy or high histamine levels in cancer patients can dampen immunotherapy responses and warrant prospectively exploring antihistamines as adjuvant agents for combinatorial immunotherapy.

Histamine in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Current status and new perspectives.

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally and its incidence and mortality are rapidly increasing worldwide. The dynamic interaction of immune cells and tumor cells determines the clinical outcome of cancer. Immunotherapy comes to the forefront of cancer treatments, resulting in impressive and durable responses but only in a fraction of patients. Thus, understanding the characteristics and profiles of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) is a necessary step to move forward in the design of new immunomodulatory strategies that can boost the immune system to fight cancer. Histamine produces a complex and fine-tuned regulation of the phenotype and functions of the different immune cells, participating in multiple regulatory responses of the innate and adaptive immunity. Considering the important actions of histamine-producing immune cells in the TME, in this review we first address the most important immunomodulatory roles of histamine and histamine receptors in the context of cancer development and progression. In addition, this review highlights the current progress and foundational developments in the field of cancer immunotherapy in combination with histamine and pharmacological compounds targeting histamine receptors.

Role of Histamine in Modulating the Immune Response and Inflammation.

Inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, histamine, bradykinin, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes, impact the immune system, usually as proinflammatory factors. Other mediators act as regulatory components to establish homeostasis after injury or prevent the inflammatory process. Histamine, a biogenic vasoactive amine, causes symptoms such as allergies and has a pleiotropic effect that is dependent on its interaction with its four histamine receptors. In this review, we discuss the dualistic effects of histamine: how histamine affects inflammation of the immune system through the activation of intracellular pathways that induce the production of inflammatory mediators and cytokines in different immune cells and how histamine exerts regulatory functions in innate and adaptive immune responses. We also evaluate the interactions between these effects.

1-[(2,3-Dihydro-1-benzofuran-2-yl) methyl]piperazines as novel anti-inflammatory compounds: Synthesis and evaluation on H3 R/H4 R.

The histamine receptors (HRs) are members of G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily and traditional targets of huge therapeutic interests. Recently, H3 R and H4 R have been explored as targets for drug discovery, including in the search for dual-acting H3 R/H4 R ligands. The H4 R, the most recent histamine receptor, is a promising target for novel anti-inflammatory agents in several conditions such as asthma and other chronic inflammatory diseases. Due to similarity with previously reported ligands of HRs, a set of 1-[(2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-2-yl)methyl]piperazines were synthesized and evaluated in competitive binding assays as H3 R/H4 R ligands herein. The results showed the compounds presented affinity (Ki ) for H3 R/H4 R in micromolar range, and they are more selective to H3 R. All the compounds showed no important cytotoxicity to mammalian cells. The phenyl-substituted compound LINS01005 has shown the higher affinity of the set for H4 R, but no considerable selectivity toward this receptor over H3 R. LINS01005 showed interesting anti-inflammatory activity in murine asthma model, reducing the eosinophil counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, as well as the COX-2 expression. The presented compounds are valuable prototypes for further improvements to achieve better anti-inflammatory agents.

Identification of histamine receptors in the canine gastrointestinal tract.

The important role of histamine in chronic gastrointestinal diseases has been increasingly recognized over the last two decades in human medicine. Histamine is released following mast cell activation and exerts its action through binding to four different histamine receptors (H1, H2, H3, and H4). Histamine receptors are dispersed throughout the body, and each different receptor mediates a unique response. Documentation of the presence and type of histamine receptors in the differing sections of the canine gastrointestinal tract will provide additional research opportunities to further explore the role of histamine and its receptors in chronic canine enteropathies, as well as potential therapeutic options. Full thickness gastric, duodenal, jejunal, ileal, and colonic biopsies were obtained from 6 clinically normal adult dogs immediately after humane euthanasia. Commercially available histamine receptor antibodies predicted to react with canine tissues were applied to paraffin-embedded tissue sections using standard immunohistochemistry techniques to identify different histamine receptors. Staining intensity was graded from negative to strong, and the specificity of each antibody was evaluated with western blot. The presence and distribution of histamine receptors varied by anatomic site and histologic level within sections of the canine gastrointestinal tract. All 4 histamine receptors were readily identified, although the distribution of H4 receptors was decreased in comparison to the other histamine receptors. The distribution of the various histamine receptors was similar to that seen in the normal human gastrointestinal tract. H1 receptors were located in the stomach, lymphoid tissue of the ileum and colon, and the smooth muscle and ganglia of all sections. H2 receptors were located in all sections of the gastrointestinal tract, with greatest staining intensity in the gastric mucosa. H3 receptors were located in the stomach and colonic mucosa, smooth muscle and ganglia of all sections, and ileal and colonic lymphoid tissue. H4 receptors were located in the ganglia and smooth muscle of the gastrointestinal tract, as well as the gastric and colonic mucosal and ileal lymphoid tissue. Western blot demonstrated both specific and non-specific staining with the H1 and H3 receptor antibody, but good specificity with the H4 receptor antibody. The H2 receptor antibody was not compatible with western blot techniques, despite excellent immunohistochemical specificity and consistency. Further studies to compare the density and distribution of the various histamine receptors in dogs with gastrointestinal disease are warranted.

[Efficacy of Kolofort for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome]. / Effektivnost' Koloforta v lechenii bol'nykh s sindromom razdrazhennogo kishechnika.

AIM: to determine the efficacy and safety of Kolofort in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 52 patients (16 men and 36 women) aged 26 to 59 years were examined over 4 months to rule out organic disease. The diagnosis of IBS was established on the basis of the Rome III diagnostic criteria (2006). Seven patients were diagnosed as having IBS with a preponderance of constipation; 3 had IBS with a preponderance of diarrhea, and 42 had mixed IBS. Thereafter they were given Kolofort, a combination release-active antibody drug having anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, and spasmolytic effects. Kolofort affects the ligand-receptor interactions of the brain-specific protein S-100 with serotonin receptors and σ1-receptors in the central nervous system and that of histamine with histamine H4 receptors in the gastrointestinal tract and modifies (regulates) the functional activity of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). The regulatory action of the drug at the level of the central and autonomic nervous system and the immune system manifests itself as spasmolytic, anti-inflammatory, and sedative effects, which as a whole effectively normalizes gastrointestinal motility. For 3 months, the patients took sublingual Kolofort in a dose of 2 tablets thrice daily for 2 weeks, then 2 tablets twice daily for 2.5 months. Control was made 2 weeks, 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment initiation. The investigators assessed abdominal pain syndrome, defecation disorders, abdominal distension, and flatulence by the visual analogue scale (VAS-IBS questionnaire), visceral sensitivity index (VSI questionnaire), quality of life (QL) in patients with IBS (IBS-QoL questionnaire), and stool form according to the Bristol Stool Chart and measured the levels of TNF-α and interleukin (IL)-1ß and IL-10 before and after treatment. RESULTS: The efficacy of Kolofort showed itself within 2 weeks of its administration against all the study functional parameters (pain, defecation disorder, and flatulence). After one month of therapy, the efficacy of Kolofort achieved meaningful statistical significance against abdominal pain, complaints of flatulence, visceral sensitivity index, and QL. The statistically significant restoration of a stool form was achieved 2 months after treatment and 3-month Kolofort treatment showed a clear-cut positive clinical effect that appeared as reductions in pain syndrome (214±0.22; р < 0.001) and visceral hypersensitivity symptoms (from 30.33±2.9 to 67.76±6.5; р < 0.001), improvements in subjective sensations associated with defecation disorders (from 6.95±0.71 to 2.74±0.28; р < 0.001), stool form, and QL indicators (from 103.48±9.06 to 44.95±5.4; р < 0.001), and a decrease in blood TNF-α levels after treatment termination (from 9.16 to 7.02 pg/ml; р < 0.026). A Kolofort treatment cycle for IBS produced no clinically relevant side effects. CONCLUSION: Kolofort was highly effective in relieving symptoms, in normalizing the psychological status, and in lowering the levels of TNF-α in the treatment of IBS. The efficacy of the drug was achieved because of its combined effect on the main components of the pathogenesis of IBS.

Diminution of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling inhibits vascular permeability and anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: During IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity reactions, vascular endothelial cells permeabilize in response to mast cell mediators. We have demonstrated previously that patients and mice with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) mutations (autosomal dominant hyper-IgE syndrome [AD-HIES]) are partially protected from anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the mechanism by which STAT3 contributes to anaphylaxis and determine whether small-molecule inhibition of STAT3 can prevent anaphylaxis. METHODS: Using unaffected and STAT3-inhibited or genetic loss-of-function samples, we performed histamine skin prick tests, investigated the contribution of STAT3 to animal models of anaphylaxis, and measured endothelial cell permeability, gene and protein expression, and histamine receptor-mediated signaling. RESULTS: Although mouse mast cell degranulation was minimally affected by STAT3 blockade, mast cell mediator-induced anaphylaxis was blunted in Stat3 mutant mice with AD-HIES and in wild-type mice subjected to small-molecule STAT3 inhibition. Histamine skin prick test responses were diminished in patients with AD-HIES. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells derived from patients with AD-HIES or treated with a STAT3 inhibitor did not signal properly through Src or cause appropriate dissolution of the adherens junctions made up of the proteins vascular endothelial-cadherin and ß-catenin. Furthermore, we found that diminished STAT3 target microRNA17-92 expression in human umbilical vein endothelial cells from patients with AD-HIES is associated with increased phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression, which inhibits Src, and increased E2F transcription factor 1 expression, which regulates ß-catenin cellular dynamics. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that STAT3-dependent transcriptional activity regulates critical components for the architecture and functional dynamics of endothelial junctions, thus permitting vascular permeability.

Expression of histamine receptors in the human endolymphatic sac: the molecular rationale for betahistine use in Menieres disease.

The human endolymphatic sac (ES) is situated in a duplicature of the dura in the posterior cranial fossa and constitutes a part of the inner ear. The sac possesses immunological capacities and is responsible for a major part of the trans-epithelial ion transport occurring within the inner ear, via molecular mechanisms similar to that of the kidney collecting duct epithelia. Dysfunction of the trans-epithelial ion transport has been hypothesized as the reason for the endolymphatic hydrops occurring in Menieres diseases. Thus, candidate drug selection for medical treatment of Menieres disease has been based on a potential capability of improving trans-epithelial ion transport. However, recent human studies seems to rule out diuretic therapy and The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use redrew the recommendation for trimetazidine (Vastarel) treatment in the management of Meniere disease in 2012. This leaves betahistine (Betaserc) as the only drug for potential prevention of the incapacitating attacks of dizziness, tinnitus and hearing loss. However, the histamine receptors targeted by betahistine have never been demonstrated in the human ES. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the expression of histamine receptors of the human ES epithelium and sub-epithelial stroma. Following sampling of human endolymphatic sac tissue during translabyrinthine surgery, the expression of histamine receptor genes was determined by cDNA microarray analysis. Results were subsequently verified by immuno-histochemistry. The combined results of microarrays and immuno-histochemistry showed expression of the histamine receptor HRH1 in the epithelial lining of the ES, whereas HRH3 was expressed exclusively in the sub-epithelial capillary network. Receptors HRH2 and -4 were not expressed. The present data provide the first direct evidence of a molecular rationale for betahistine treatment in Menieres disease. A potential betahistine effect in Menieres disease may primarily be through the H3-receptor antagonism, leading to inhibition of vestibular neuro-transmission and central vaso-dilation. The H1-receptor localization in the ES epithelium suggests an immuno-regulatory effect.

The histamine H4 receptor regulates chemokine production in human natural killer cells.

BACKGROUND: Natural killer (NK) cells have been detected in the lesional skin of patients with inflammatory skin diseases, where high levels of histamine are also present. Therefore, we investigated the effect of histamine, in particular via the histamine H4 receptor (H4R), on gene expression levels in human NK cells. METHODS: Comprehensive microarray-based mRNA expression profiling was performed to assess the gene expression levels in human NK cells in response to H4R stimulation in an unbiased approach. The expression of selected cytokines and chemokines was quantified by real-time PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The microarray analysis identified only few genes which were differentially regulated upon H4R stimulation. In follow-up studies, a significant upregulation of CCL3 and CCL4 at the mRNA level and in addition for CCL3 also at the protein level via the H4R was observed. CONCLUSION: The elevated expression levels of chemokines in response to H4R stimulation might foster the inflammation in allergic skin diseases and characterize the H4R as a promising therapeutic target.

Stimulation of the histamine 4 receptor with 4-methylhistamine modulates the effects of chronic stress on the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance.

Alterations to the immune system caused by stress have been considered to markedly increase the risk for immune-related diseases such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. We investigated the potential anti-stress effects of the histamine 4 receptor (H4R) agonist, 4-methylhistamine (4-MeH), in a murine stress model. Mice were placed in 50ml conical centrifuge tubes for 12h followed by a 12h rest. The effects of treatment with 4-MeH (30mg/kg, i.p., twice daily) for 2 days were assessed. At 2 days after physical restraint, mice were sacrificed and tissues harvested. We evaluated the effects of 4-MeH treatment on CD4(+) T cell production, and intracellular IFN-γ and IL-4 expression in these cells. We also assessed IL-1ß, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-4 mRNA expression as well as IFN-γ, TNF-α, GITR, Ox40 and IL-4 protein expression in the spleen. The results showed that 4-MeH treatment of stressed mice results in a substantial increase in the CD4(+) T cells as well as in IFN-γ production by these cells. Compared to both untreated and stressed controls. In contrast, IL-4 expression decreased significantly following 4-MeH treatment of mice. Moreover, stimulation of the H4R resulted in up-regulated expression of IL-1ß, IFN-γ and TNF-α mRNAs and decreased the expression of IL-4. Western blot analysis confirmed decreased protein expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, GITR, Ox40 and increased IL-4 in the SC group and treatment of mice with 4-MeH reversed these effects. Our results confirm the significant impact of chronic stress on T cell function and production of Th1/Th2 mediators H4R.

The histamine H4 -receptor (H4 R) regulates eosinophilic inflammation in ovalbumin-induced experimental allergic asthma in mice.

Via the histamine H4 -receptor (H4 R), histamine promotes the pathogenesis of experimental allergic asthma in mice. Application of H4 R antagonists during sensitization as well as during provocation reduces the severity of the disease. However, the specific cell types functionally expressing H4 R in experimental allergic asthma have not been well characterized in vivo. In this study, we identified the cell type(s) responsible for H4 R activity in experimental asthma and related physiological mechanisms. Using H4 R-deficient mice, we studied the role of H4 R in the sensitization and effector phase. DCs lacking H4 R expression during the in vitro sensitization reaction resulted in effector T cells unable to induce an entire eosinophilic inflammation in the lung upon adoptive transfer in vivo. Recipient mice lacking H4 R expression, which were adoptively transferred with H4 R(+/+) T cells polarized in the presence of H4 R(+/+) DCs, showed reduced signs of inflammation and ameliorated lung function. Here, we provide in vivo evidence that in experimental asthma in mice the H4 R specifically regulates activation of DCs during sensitization, while in the effector phase the H4 R is active in cells involved in the activation of eosinophils, and possibly other cells. A putative therapy targeting the H4 R may be an option for asthma patients developing IL-5-dependent eosinophilia.

Histamine H4 receptor ligands: future applications and state of art.

Histamine is a chemical transmitter found practically in whole organism and exerts its effects through the interaction with H1 to H4 histaminergic receptors. Specifically, H4 receptors are found mainly in immune cells and blood-forming tissues, thus are involved in inflammatory and immune processes, as well as some actions in central nervous system. Therefore, H4 receptor ligands can have applications in the treatment of chronic inflammatory and immune diseases and may be novel therapeutic option in these conditions. Several H4 receptor ligands have been described from early 2000's until nowadays, being imidazole, indolecarboxamide, 2-aminopyrimidine, quinazoline, and quinoxaline scaffolds the most explored and discussed in this review. Moreover, several studies of molecular modeling using homology models of H4 receptor and QSAR data of the ligands are summarized. The increasing and promising therapeutic applications are leading these compounds to clinical trials, which probably will be part of the next generation of blockbuster drugs.

Immunological and molecular targets of atopic dermatitis treatment.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease with a highly variable clinical phenotype and heterogeneous pathophysiology. Its pathogenesis is associated with alterations to both the skin barrier and the immune system, which may in turn be influenced by genetic mutations and the patient's environment. Basic and translational research, as well as clinical trials, have helped broaden our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of AD and to identify potential treatment targets and approaches. These include new ways of reducing transepidermal water loss and the shedding of corneocytes, new ways of interacting with established molecular targets (such as histamine receptors and interleukins and other T-cell cytokines), and the identification of new molecular targets (such as toll-like receptors and tight junction proteins). Well-established treatment options such as emollients, corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors will clearly continue to have a role in treating AD. Among the new agents that could be joining them in the near future are sphinganin (a precursor of ceramides 1 and 3), cannabinoids, highly targeted monoclonal antibodies and subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Mast cell histamine promotes the immunoregulatory activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

It has been shown recently that MCs are required for differential regulation of the immune response by granulocytic versus monocytic MDSCs. Granulocytic MDSCs promoted parasite clearance, whereas monocytic MDSCs enhanced tumor progression; both activities were abrogated in MC-deficient mice. Herein, we demonstrate that the lack of MCs also influences MDSC trafficking. Preferential trafficking to the liver was not seen in MC-deficient mice. In addition, evidence that the MC mediator histamine was important in MDSC trafficking and activation is also shown. MDSCs express HR1-3. Blockade of these receptors by HR1 or HR2 antagonists reversed the histamine enhancement of MDSC survival and proliferation observed in cell culture. In addition, histamine differentially influenced Arg1 and iNOS gene expression in MDSCs and greatly enhanced IL-4 and IL-13 message, especially in granulocytic MDSCs. Evidence that histamine influenced activity seen in vitro translated to in vivo when HR1 and HR2 antagonists blocked the effect of MDSCs on parasite expulsion and tumor metastasis. All of these data support the MDSC-mediated promotion of Th2 immunity, leading to the suggestion that allergic-prone individuals would have elevated MDSC levels. This was directly demonstrated by looking at the relative MDSC levels in allergic versus control patients. Monocytic MDSCs trended higher, whereas granulocytic MDSCs were increased significantly in allergic patients. Taken together, our studies indicate that MCs and MC-released histamine are critical for MDSC-mediated immune regulation, and this interaction should be taken into consideration for therapeutic interventions that target MDSCs.

The histamine H4 receptor mediates inflammation and Th17 responses in preclinical models of arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) has been shown to drive inflammatory responses in models of asthma, colitis and dermatitis, and in these models it appears to affect both innate and adaptive immune responses. In this study, we used both H4R-deficient mice and a specific H4R antagonist, JNJ 28307474, to investigate the involvement of the H4R in mouse arthritis models. METHODS: H4R-deficient mice and wild-type mice administered the H4R antagonist were studied in models of collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). The impact on Th17 cells was assessed by restimulation of inguinal lymphocytes in the disease or immunisation models and with in vitro stimulation of whole blood. RESULTS: Both H4R-deficient mice and mice treated with the H4R antagonist exhibited reduced arthritis disease severity in both CAIA and CIA models. This was evident from the reduction in disease score and in joint histology. In the CIA model, treatment with the H4R antagonist reduced the number of interleukin (IL)-17 positive cells in the lymph node and the total production of IL-17. Th17 cell development in vivo was reduced in H4R-deficient mice or in mice treated with an H4R antagonist. Finally, treatment of both mouse and human blood with an H4R antagonist reduced the production of IL-17 when cells were stimulated in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: These results implicate the H4R in disease progression in arthritis and in the production of IL-17 from Th17 cells. This work supports future clinical exploration of H4R antagonists for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Histamine downregulates the Th1-associated chemokine IP-10 in monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells.

BACKGROUND: Histamine is an important mediator of allergic diseases. It modulates the cytokine expression of various subtypes of antigen-presenting cells by four known receptors, H1R-H4R. The effects of histamine on myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) are unclear. METHODS: Monocytes and mDC were isolated from human PBMC. Histamine receptor expression was evaluated by real-time PCR. Cells were stimulated with histamine and histamine receptor ligands, and restimulated with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C), and supernatants were analyzed by protein array and ELISA. RESULTS: Monocytes and mDC express H1R and H2R without significant differences between the two cell types, whereas H4R mRNA was significantly higher in mDC compared with monocytes and H3R mRNA was not detected in any cell type. Prestimulation with histamine caused a significant decrease in poly I:C-induced expression of interferon-γ-induced protein (IP-10) in mDC and monocytes. Stimulation with specific H1R, H2R and H4R agonists and antagonists showed that the observed effect was mediated via H2R and H4R in monocytes and mDC. CONCLUSION: Monocytes and mDC have similar histamine receptor repertoires with regard to H1R, H2R and H3R, but H4R expression is higher on mDC. Histamine stimulation shows similar functional effects on both cell types, i.e., downregulation of TLR3-induced IP-10 production. This might be a new mechanism how histamine fosters a Th2 milieu.

Histamine receptor H4 regulates mast cell degranulation and IgE induced FcεRI upregulation in murine bone marrow-derived mast cells.

There is increasing evidence that histamine regulates the immune system via histamine H4 receptors, therefore we sought to investigate the functions of the H4 receptor on mast cells. Mast cells were differentiated from murine bone marrow stem cells, and the expression of mast cell surface markers FcεRI and CD117 were measured using flow cytometry. Real-time qRT-PCR was used to determine the expression of mH4R; as a measure of antigen-dependent degranulation, ß-hexosaminidase release assay was carried out using IgE sensitized mast cells. We determined that the expression kinetics of FcεRI and mH4R can be described with a function that has one maximum value in the time range of the culture's differentiation. Antigen-dependent degranulation of murine bone marrow-derived mast cells could be inhibited by a selective H4 antagonist/inverse agonist only when it was present during the IgE sensitization phase of degranulation. In addition, flow cytometric analysis revealed that the H4 antagonist/inverse agonist also inhibited IgE induced FcεRI upregulation. The inhibition percentage of H4 antagonist on IgE induced FcεRI upregulation was determined to be dependent upon the maturity of the mast cell cultures, and this time-dependency was consistent with the expression kinetics of both mH4R and FcεRI. These results imply that H4R has regulatory roles in FcεRI expression and FcεRI mediated functions in mast cells. In conclusion the present study shows that H4 receptors potentially play a role in IgE induced FcεRI upregulation and in the sensitization phase but not the effector phase of mast cell degranulation.

The neglected role of histamine in Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by beta-amyloid plaques accumulation and cognitive impairment. Both environmental factors and heritable predisposition have a role in AD. Histamine is a biogenic monoamine that plays a role in several physiological functions, including induction of inflammatory reactions, wound healing, and regeneration. The Histamine mediates its functions via its 4 G-protein-coupled Histamine H1 receptor (H1R) to histamine H1 receptor (H4R). The histaminergic system has a role in the treatment of brain disorders by the development of histamine receptor agonists, antagonists. The H1R and H4R are responsible for allergic inflammation. But recent studies show that histamine antagonists against H3R and regulation of H2R can be more efficient in AD therapy. In this review, we focus on the role of histamine and its receptors in the treatment of AD, and we hope that histamine could be an effective therapeutic factor in the treatment of AD.

Sequential engagement of FcεRI on Mast Cells and Basophil Histamine H(4) Receptor and FcεRI in Allergic Rhinitis.

Histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R)-deficient mice (H(4)R(-/-)), H(4)R antagonist-treated wild-type (WT) mice, and WT mice depleted of basophils failed to develop early (EPR) or late phase (LPR) nasal responses following allergen sensitization and challenge. Basophil transfer from WT but not H(4)R(-/-) mice restored the EPR and LPR in H(4)R(-/-) mice. Following passive sensitization with OVA-specific IgE, FcεRI(-/-) recipients of WT basophils plus OVA and histamine developed an EPR and LPR. OVA-IgE passively sensitized FcεRI(-/-) recipients of H(4)R(-/-) basophils and OVA and histamine challenge failed to develop an EPR or LPR, and basophils were not detected in nasal tissue. In contrast, recipients of basophils from IL-13(-/-) and IL-4(-/-)/IL-13(-/-) mice developed an EPR but not an LPR. These results demonstrate the development of allergic rhinitis proceeded in two distinct stages: histamine release from FcεRI-activated mast cells, followed by histamine-mediated recruitment of H(4)R-expressing basophils to the nasal cavity and activation through FcεRI.