The Road towards Triple Agonists: Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide and Glucagon Receptor - An Update.

Obesity is the fifth leading risk factor for global deaths with numbers continuing to increase worldwide. In the last 20 years, the emergence of pharmacological treatments for obesity based on gastrointestinal hormones has transformed the therapeutic landscape. The successful development of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, followed by the synergistic combined effect of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 receptor agonists achieved remarkable weight loss and glycemic control in those with the diseases of obesity and type 2 diabetes. The multiple cardiometabolic benefits include improving glycemic control, lipid profiles, blood pressure, inflammation, and hepatic steatosis. The 2023 phase 2 double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating a GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor triagonist (retatrutide) in patients with the disease of obesity reported 24.2% weight loss at 48 weeks with 12 mg retatrutide. This review evaluates the current available evidence for GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/GIP receptor co-agonists with a focus on GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor triagonists and discusses the potential future benefits and research directions.

A Review of Incretin Therapies Approved and in Late-Stage Development for Overweight and Obesity Management.

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical trial data for incretin therapies that are approved or in late-stage development for overweight or obesity management, along with clinical implications of these therapies and future directions. METHODS: We searched for clinical trials involving incretin therapies studied specifically for overweight or obesity management in ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed from registry inception through December 2023. RESULTS: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonism, alone and in combination with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonism or glucagon agonism, leads to significant weight reduction in people with overweight or obesity. Newer incretin therapies have demonstrated weight reduction between 15% to 25%, far outpacing non-incretin therapies for weight management and achieving levels of weight loss that may prevent weight-related complications. However, the discontinuation of incretin therapies is associated with weight regain. The main side effects of incretin therapies are transient, mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal side effects - nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and vomiting - that commonly occur in the first 4 to 8 weeks of treatment. There is a rich late-stage pipeline of incretin therapies for weight management, consisting of oral GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonists, triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonists, and combination therapies with nonincretin drugs. CONCLUSION: Newer incretin therapies for weight management have the potential to improve the treatment for overweight and obesity, the treatment and prevention of weight-related complications, and the individualization of weight management. Ensuring that these therapies are accessible - and that treatment with them is consistent and sustainable - is necessary to translate findings from trials into the real world.

Cotadutide promotes glycogenolysis in people with overweight or obesity diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

Cotadutide is a dual glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucagon receptor agonist under development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is a complex disease with no approved pharmacotherapies, arising from an underlying state of systemic metabolic dysfunction in association with T2DM and obesity. Cotadutide has been shown to improve glycaemic control, body weight, lipids, liver fat, inflammation and fibrosis. We conducted a two-part, randomized phase 2a trial in men and women with overweight or obesity diagnosed with T2DM to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cotadutide compared with placebo and liraglutide. The primary endpoints were change from baseline to day 28 of treatment in postprandial hepatic glycogen (part A) and to day 35 of treatment in fasting hepatic glycogen (part B) with cotadutide versus placebo. Secondary endpoints in part B were changes in fasting hepatic glycogen with cotadutide versus the mono glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, liraglutide, and change in hepatic fat fraction. The trial met its primary endpoint. We showed that cotadutide promotes greater reductions in liver glycogen and fat compared with placebo and liraglutide. Safety and tolerability findings with cotadutide were comparable to those of previous reports. Thus, this work provides evidence of additional benefits of cotadutide that could be attributed to glucagon receptor engagement. Our results suggest that cotadutide acts on the glucagon receptor in the human liver to promote glycogenolysis and improve the metabolic health of the liver. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03555994 .

Retatrutide, a GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, for people with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 trial conducted in the USA.

BACKGROUND: According to current consensus guidelines for type 2 diabetes management, bodyweight management is as important as attaining glycaemic targets. Retatrutide, a single peptide with agonist activity at the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), GLP-1, and glucagon receptors, showed clinically meaningful glucose-lowering and bodyweight-lowering efficacy in a phase 1 study. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of retatrutide in people with type 2 diabetes across a range of doses. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 trial, participants were recruited from 42 research and health-care centres in the USA. Adults aged 18-75 years with type 2 diabetes, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7·0-10·5% (53·0-91·3 mmol/mol), and BMI of 25-50 kg/m2 were eligible for enrolment. Eligible participants were treated with diet and exercise alone or with a stable dose of metformin (≥1000 mg once daily) for at least 3 months before the screening visit. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1:1:1:1:2) using an interactive web-response system, with stratification for baseline HbA1c and BMI, to receive once-weekly injections of placebo, 1·5 mg dulaglutide, or retatrutide maintenance doses of 0·5 mg, 4 mg (starting dose 2 mg), 4 mg (no escalation), 8 mg (starting dose 2 mg), 8 mg (starting dose 4 mg), or 12 mg (starting dose 2 mg). Participants, study site personnel, and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until after study end. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks, and secondary endpoints included change in HbA1c and bodyweight at 36 weeks. Efficacy was analysed in all randomly assigned, except inadvertently enrolled, participants, and safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04867785. FINDINGS: Between May 13, 2021, and June 13, 2022, 281 participants (mean age 56·2 years [SD 9·7], mean duration of diabetes 8·1 years [7·0], 156 [56%] female, and 235 [84%] White) were randomly assigned and included in the safety analysis (45 in the placebo group, 46 in the 1·5 mg dulaglutide group, and 47 in the retatrutide 0·5 mg group, 23 in the 4 mg escalation group, 24 in the 4 mg group, 26 in the 8 mg slow escalation group, 24 in the 8 mg fast escalation group, and 46 in the 12 mg escalation group). 275 participants were included in the efficacy analyses (one each in the retatrutide 0·5 mg group, 4 mg escalation group, and 8 mg slow escalation group, and three in the 12 mg escalation group were inadvertently enrolled). 237 (84%) participants completed the study and 222 (79%) completed study treatment. At 24 weeks, least-squares mean changes from baseline in HbA1c with retatrutide were -0·43% (SE 0·20; -4·68 mmol/mol [2·15]) for the 0·5 mg group, -1·39% (0·14; -15·24 mmol/mol [1·56]) for the 4 mg escalation group, -1·30% (0·22; -14·20 mmol/mol [2·44]) for the 4 mg group, -1·99% (0·15; -21·78 mmol/mol [1·60]) for the 8 mg slow escalation group, -1·88% (0·21; -20·52 mmol/mol [2·34]) for the 8 mg fast escalation group, and -2·02% (0·11; -22·07 mmol/mol [1·21]) for the 12 mg escalation group, versus -0·01% (0·21; -0·12 mmol/mol [2·27]) for the placebo group and -1·41% (0·12; -15·40 mmol/mol [1·29]) for the 1·5 mg dulaglutide group. HbA1c reductions with retatrutide were significantly greater (p<0·0001) than placebo in all but the 0·5 mg group and greater than 1·5 mg dulaglutide in the 8 mg slow escalation group (p=0·0019) and 12 mg escalation group (p=0·0002). Findings were consistent at 36 weeks. Bodyweight decreased dose dependently with retatrutide at 36 weeks by 3·19% (SE 0·61) for the 0·5 mg group, 7·92% (1·28) for the 4 mg escalation group, 10·37% (1·56) for the 4 mg group, 16·81% (1·59) for the 8 mg slow escalation group, 16·34% (1·65) for the 8 mg fast escalation group, and 16·94% (1·30) for the 12 mg escalation group, versus 3·00% (0·86) with placebo and 2·02% (0·72) with 1·5 mg dulaglutide. For retatrutide doses of 4 mg and greater, decreases in weight were significantly greater than with placebo (p=0·0017 for the 4 mg escalation group and p<0·0001 for others) and 1·5 mg dulaglutide (all p<0·0001). Mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea, diarrhoea, vomiting, and constipation, were reported in 67 (35%) of 190 participants in the retatrutide groups (from six [13%] of 47 in the 0·5 mg group to 12 [50%] of 24 in the 8 mg fast escalation group), six (13%) of 45 participants in the placebo group, and 16 (35%) of 46 participants in the 1·5 mg dulaglutide group. There were no reports of severe hypoglycaemia and no deaths during the study. INTERPRETATION: In people with type 2 diabetes, retatrutide showed clinically meaningful improvements in glycaemic control and robust reductions in bodyweight, with a safety profile consistent with GLP-1 receptor agonists and GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonists. These phase 2 data also informed dose selection for the phase 3 programme. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

Cinchonine, a Potential Oral Small-Molecule Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist, Lowers Blood Glucose and Ameliorates Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Purpose: The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) is an effective therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Research has focused on small-molecule GLP-1R agonists because of their ease of use in oral formulations and improved patient compliance. However, no small-molecule GLP-1R agonists are currently available in the market. We aimed to screen for a potential oral small-molecule GLP-1R agonist and evaluated its effect on blood glucose and NASH. Methods: The Connectivity map database was used to screen for candidate small-molecule compounds. Molecular docking was performed using SYBYL software. Rat pancreatic islets were incubated in different concentrations glucose solutions, with cinchonine or Exendin (9-39) added to determine insulin secretion levels. C57BL/6 mice, GLP-1R-/- mice and hGLP-1R mice were used to conduct oral glucose tolerance test. In addition, we fed ob/ob mice with the GAN diet to induce the NASH model. Cinchonine (50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg) was administered orally twice daily to the mice. Serum liver enzymes were measured using biochemical analysis. Liver tissues were examined using Hematoxylin-eosin staining, Oil Red O staining and Sirius Red staining. Results: Based on the small intestinal transcriptome of geniposide, a recognized small-molecule GLP-1R agonist, we identified that cinchonine exerted GLP-1R agonist-like effects. Cinchonine had a good binding affinity for GLP-1R. Cinchonine promoted glucose-dependent insulin secretion, which could be attenuated significantly by Exendin (9-39), a specific GLP-1R antagonist. Moreover, cinchonine could reduce blood glucose in C57BL/6 and hGLP-1R mice, an effect that could be inhibited with GLP-1R knockout. In addition, cinchonine reduced body weight gain and food intake in ob/ob-GAN NASH mice dose-dependently. 100 mg/kg cinchonine significantly improved liver function by reducing the ALT, ALP and LDH levels. Importantly, 100 mg/kg cinchonine ameliorated hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in NASH mice. Conclusion: Cinchonine, a potential oral small-molecule GLP-1R agonist, could reduce blood glucose and ameliorate NASH, providing a strategy for developing small-molecule GLP-1R agonists.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Cotadutide, a GLP-1 and Glucagon Receptor Dual Agonist, in Individuals with Renal Impairment: A Single-Dose, Phase I, Bridging Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cotadutide is a balanced glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor dual agonist under development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of cotadutide in individuals with varying degrees of renal impairment. METHODS: In this phase I bridging study, individuals 18-85 years of age, with a body mass index of 17-40 kg/m2 and varying degrees of renal function {end-stage renal disease (ESRD; creatinine clearance [CrCl] < 20 mL/min); severe renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 20 to < 30 mL/min); lower moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 30 to < 44 mL/min); upper moderate renal impairment (CrCl ≥ 45 to < 60 mL/min); normal renal function (CrCl ≥ 90 mL/min)} were treated with a single dose of subcutaneous cotadutide 100 µg under fasted conditions in the lower abdomen. The co-primary endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 48 h (AUC48) and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) for cotadutide. Safety and immunogenicity were secondary endpoints. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03235375). RESULTS: A total of 37 individuals were enrolled in the study (only three enrolled in the ESRD group, therefore this group was excluded from the primary PK analysis). AUC48 and Cmax values for cotadutide were similar across all renal function groups {severe renal impairment vs. normal renal function: AUC48 geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.99 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.29); lower moderate renal impairment versus normal renal function: AUC48 GMR 1.01 (90% CI 0.79-1.30); upper moderate renal impairment versus normal renal function: AUC48 GMR 1.09 (90% CI 0.82-1.43)}. A sensitivity analysis that combined the ESRD and severe renal impairment groups did not show notable changes in the AUC48 and Cmax GMRs. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) ranged from 42.9 to 72.7% across all groups and were mostly mild to moderate in severity. Only one patient had a grade III or worse TEAE during the study period. No positive antidrug antibody results were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the PK and tolerability of cotadutide are unaffected by renal function and that dose adjustments may not be required in individuals with renal impairment.

The Effects of Dual GLP-1/Glucagon Receptor Agonists with Different Receptor Selectivity in Mouse Models of Obesity and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

There is an unmet need for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) therapeutics, considering the increase in global obesity. Dual GLP-1/glucagon (GCG) receptor agonists have shown beneficial effects in circumventing the pathophysiology linked to NASH. However, dual GLP-1/GCG receptor agonists as a treatment of metabolic diseases need delicate optimization to maximize metabolism effects. The impacts of increased relative GLP-1/GCG receptor activity in NASH settings must be addressed to unleash the full potential. In this study, we investigated the potential of OXM-104 and OXM-101, two dual GLP-1/GCG receptor agonists with different receptor selectivity in the setting of NASH, to establish the relative receptor activities leading to the best metabolic outcome efficacies to reduce the gap between surgery and pharmacological interventions. We developed dual GLP-1/GCG receptor agonists with selective agonism. Despite the improved metabolic effects of OXM-101, we explored a hyperglycemic risk attached to increased relative GCG receptor agonism. Thirty-eight days of treatment with a dual GLP-1/GCG receptor agonist, OXM-104, with increased GLP-1 receptor agonism in obese NASH mice was found to ameliorate the development of NASH by lowering body weight, improving liver and lipid profiles, reducing the levels of the fibrosis marker PRO-C4, and improving glucose control. Similarly, dual GLP-1/GCG receptor agonist OXM-101 with increased relative GCG receptor agonism ameliorated NASH by eliciting dramatic body weight reductions to OXM-104, reflected in the improvement of liver and lipid enzymes and reduced PRO-C4 levels. Optimizing dual GLP-1/GCG agonists with increased relative GCG receptor agonism can provide the setting for future agonists to treat obesity, type 2 diabetes, and NASH without having a hyperglycemic risk. SIGNIFICANT STATEMENT: There is an unmet need for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) therapeutics, considering the increase in global obesity. Dual GLP-1/glucagon (GCG) receptor agonists have shown beneficial effects in circumventing the pathophysiology linked to NASH. Therefore, this study has examined OXM-104 and OXM-101, two dual GLP-1/GCG receptor agonists in the setting of NASH, to establish the relative receptor activities leading to the best metabolic outcome efficacies to reduce the gap between surgery and pharmacological interventions.

Xenopus GLP-1-based glycopeptides as dual glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor/glucagon receptor agonists with improved in vivo stability for treating diabetes and obesity.

Peptide dual agonists toward both glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) and glucagon receptor (GCGR) are emerging as novel therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with obesity. Our previous work identified a Xenopus GLP-1-based dual GLP-1R/GCGR agonist termed xGLP/GCG-13, which showed decent hypoglycemic and body weight lowering activity. However, the clinical utility of xGLP/GCG-13 is limited due to its short in vivo half-life. Inspired by the fact that O-GlcNAcylation of intracellular proteins leads to increased stability of secreted proteins, we rationally designed a panel of O-GlcNAcylated xGLP/GCG-13 analogs as potential long-acting GLP-1R/ GCGR dual agonists. One of the synthesized glycopeptides 1f was found to be equipotent to xGLP/GCG-13 in cell-based receptor activation assays. As expected, O-GlcNAcylation effectively improved the stability of xGLP/GCG-13 in vivo. Importantly, chronic administration of 1f potently induced body weight loss and hypoglycemic effects, improved glucose tolerance, and normalized lipid metabolism and adiposity in both db/db and diet induced obesity (DIO) mice models. These results supported the hypothesis that glycosylation is a useful strategy for improving the in vivo stability of GLP-1-based peptides and promoted the development of dual GLP-1R/GCGR agonists as antidiabetic/antiobesity drugs.

The glucagon receptor antagonist LY2409021 does not affect gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal or the incretin effect in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes.

Objective: Gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal (GIGD) during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) reflects the percentage of glucose disposal caused by mechanisms elicited by the oral route of glucose administration. GIGD is reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to a reduced incretin effect and possibly also due to inappropriate suppression of glucagon after oral glucose. We investigated the effect of glucagon receptor antagonism on GIGD, the incretin effect and glucose excursions in patients with T2D and controls without diabetes. Design: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted. Methods: Ten patients with T2D and 10 gender-, age- and BMI-matched controls underwent two 50 g OGTTs and 2 isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusions, succeeding (~10 h) single-dose administration of 100 mg of the glucagon receptor antagonist LY2409021 or placebo, respectively. Results: Compared to placebo, LY2409021 reduced fasting plasma glucose in patients with T2D and controls. Plasma glucose excursions after oral glucose assessed by baseline-subtracted area under the curve were increased by LY2409021 compared to placebo in both groups, but no effect of LY2409021 on GIGD or the incretin effect was observed. LY2409021 increased fasting glucagon concentrations three-fold compared to placebo concentrations. Conclusions: Glucagon receptor antagonism with LY2409021 had no effect on the impaired GIGD or the impaired incretin effect in patients with T2D and did also not affect these parameters in the controls. Surprisingly, we observed reduced oral glucose tolerance with LY2409021 which may be specific for this glucagon receptor antagonist.

Is Glucagon Receptor Activation the Thermogenic Solution for Treating Obesity?

A major challenge of obesity therapy is to sustain clinically relevant weight loss over time. Achieving this goal likely requires both reducing daily caloric intake and increasing caloric expenditure. Over the past decade, advances in pharmaceutical engineering of ligands targeting G protein-coupled receptors have led to the development of highly effective anorectic agents. These include mono-agonists of the GLP-1R and dual GIPR/GLP-1R co-agonists that have demonstrated substantial weight loss in experimental models and in humans. By contrast, currently, there are no medicines available that effectively augment metabolic rate to promote weight loss. Here, we present evidence indicating that activation of the GCGR may provide a solution to this unmet therapeutic need. In adult humans, GCGR agonism increases energy expenditure to a magnitude sufficient for inducing a negative energy balance. In preclinical studies, the glucagon-GCGR system affects key metabolically relevant organs (including the liver and white and brown adipose tissue) to boost whole-body thermogenic capacity and protect from obesity. Further, activation of the GCGR has been shown to augment both the magnitude and duration of weight loss that is achieved by either selective GLP-1R or dual GIPR/GLP-1R agonism in rodents. Based on the accumulation of such findings, we propose that the thermogenic activity of GCGR agonism will also complement other anti-obesity agents that lower body weight by suppressing appetite.

A GLP-1/glucagon (GCG)/CCK2 receptors tri-agonist provides new therapy for obesity and diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon (GCG) receptor dual agonist have promising therapeutic effects in the treatment of obesity and diabetes. Moreover, GLP-1 and cholecystokinin 2 (CCK2 ) dual agonists have been shown to restore pancreas function and improve glycaemic control in preclinical studies. We describe, for the first time, the beneficial effects of GLP-1/glucagon receptor and GLP-1/CCK2 dual agonists, which can be integrated into one peptide, resulting in significant anti-diabetes and anti-obesity effectiveness. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The in vitro potency of this novel peptide Xenopus (x) GLP-1/GCG/CCK2 tri-agonist (xGLP/GCG/gastrin) against GLP-1, GCG, CCK1 and CCK2 receptors was determined on cells expressing the corresponding receptors by cAMP accumulation or ERK1/2 phosphorylation assays. The in vivo anti-diabetes and anti-obesity effects of this tri-agonist xGLP/GCG/gastrin were studied in both db/db and diet induced obesity (DIO) mice. KEY RESULTS: xGLP/GCG/gastrin was a potent and selective GLP-1, GCG and CCK2 tri-agonist. In DIO mice, the metabolic benefits of xGLP-1/GCG/gastrin, such as reduction of body weight and hepatic lipid contents were significantly better than those of the peptide ZP3022 (GLP-1/CCK-2 dual agonist) and liraglutide. In a short-term study in db/db mice, xGLP/GCG/gastrin treatment had considerable effects, increasing islet numbers, islet areas and insulin content. In a long-term treatment study using db/db mice, xGLP-1/GCG/gastrin showed a significantly and sustained improvement in glucose tolerance and glucose control compared with that of liraglutide, ZP3022, cotadutide (GLP-1/GCG dual agonist) and xGLP/GCG-15. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate the therapeutic potential of xGLP-1/GCG/gastrin for the treatment of obesity and diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment patterns in U.S. nursing home residents.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (diabetes) in nursing home residents (NHRs) is increasing, concurrently with obesity and other comorbid conditions. NHR would benefit greatly from antidiabetic medications that would improve glycemic control and give a lower risk of hypoglycemia but that do not contribute to weight gain in obese individuals. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prescription patterns to NHRs with diabetes, including the use of newer injectable therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. METHODS: Treatment patterns of diabetes in NHR were analyzed using Minimum Data Set records and prescription claims from the Omnicare Senior Health Outcomes data repository (May 2011-September 2012). RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes in this population of 229,283 NHRs was 35.4%. Among the 44,665 NHRs with diabetes and prescription claims data, the prevalence of obesity (40.3%) and multiple comorbidities (100%) was high. Approximately 20% of the NHRs with diabetes were aged <65 years. Overall, 20% of NHRs had diabetes that was untreated with medications during the study period. Insulin was the mainstay of treatment (>80%), followed by oral agents (54%). GLP-1 receptor agonist use was low (0.5%) and associated with poor treatment persistence. CONCLUSION: Considerations other than glycemic control may drive prescribing decisions, contrary to recommendations from the American Diabetes Association, American Medical Directors Association, and European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

A decision support tool for appropriate glucose-lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Optimal glucose-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus requires a patient-specific approach. Although a good framework, current guidelines are insufficiently detailed to address the different phenotypes and individual needs of patients seen in daily practice. We developed a patient-specific decision support tool based on a systematic analysis of expert opinion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) 2012 position statement, a panel of 12 European experts rated the appropriateness (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method) of treatment strategies for 930 clinical scenarios, which were permutations of clinical variables considered relevant to treatment choice. These included current treatment, hemoglobin A1c difference from individualized target, risk of hypoglycemia, body mass index, life expectancy, and comorbidities. Treatment options included addition of a second or third agent, drug switches, and replacement by monotherapies if the patient was metformin-intolerant. Treatment costs were not considered. Appropriateness (appropriate, inappropriate, uncertain) was based on the median score and expert agreement. The panel recommendations were embedded in an online decision support tool (DiaScope(®); Novo Nordisk Health Care AG, Zürich, Switzerland). RESULTS: Treatment appropriateness was associated with (combinations of) the patient variables mentioned above. As second-line agents, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were considered appropriate in all scenarios, followed by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (50%), insulins (33%), and sulfonylureas (25%), but not pioglitazone (0%). Ratings of third-line combinations followed a similar pattern. Disagreement was highest for regimens including pioglitazone, sulfonylureas, or insulins and was partly due to differences in panelists' opinions and in drug availability and reimbursement across European countries (although costs were disregarded in the rating process). CONCLUSIONS: A novel decision support tool based on the ADA/EASD 2012 position statement and a systematic analysis of expert opinion has been developed to help healthcare professionals to individualize glucose-lowering therapy in daily clinical situations.

Incretin-mimetic therapies and pancreatic disease: a review of observational data.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Signals from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) and pre-clinical and human pancreata obtained from organ donors have suggested that incretin-based therapies used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, may increase the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) and pancreatic cancer (PC). However, data from observational studies and randomized trials have been conflicting. We conducted a literature review to identify and summarize all observational data published assessing the pancreatic safety of incretins. METHODS: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed and Embase using the key terms for the time period of 1 January 2005, to 12 February 2014. A total of 180 articles were screened in abstract form and 49 were subsequently reviewed in full text for inclusion. Data from 12 articles are included in this report. FINDINGS: Data from the FDA AERS database suggest increased risk of AP and PC with GLP-1 receptor agonist and DPP-4 inhibitor use. These findings are not supported by population-based observational studies for either AP or PC; however, studies assessing the relationship between PC and incretin-based therapies are limited. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is conflicting and inadequate to conclude whether use of incretin-based therapies increases the risk of AP and PC. Further studies, with the ability to provide long term follow-up, are needed.

Treating the obese diabetic.

Type 2 diabetes and obesity are intimately linked; reduction of bodyweight improves glycemic control, mortality and morbidity. Treating obesity in the diabetic is hampered as some diabetic treatments lead to weight gain. Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective antiobesity treatment and causes long-term remission of diabetes in many patients. However, surgery has a high cost and is associated with a significant risk of complications, and in practical terms only limited numbers can undergo this therapy. The choice of pharmacological agents suitable for treatment of diabetes and obesity is currently limited. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists improve glycemia and induce a modest weight loss, but there are doubts over their long-term safety. New drugs such as lorcaserin and phentermine/topiramate are being approved for obesity and have modest, salutary effects on glycemia, but again long-term safety is unclear. This article will also examine some future avenues for development, including gut hormone analogues that promise to combine powerful weight reduction with beneficial effects on glucose metabolism.

Glucagon like Peptide-1 and atherosclerosis.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at high risk for developing cardiovascular diseases. Traditional medicines for type 2 diabetes, such as sulfonylureas, pioglitazone, and insulin have glucose lowering effects; however, they also increase the frequency of hypoglycemia and/or body weight and thus may cancel out the benefits of glucose lowering on the development of atherosclerosis. In contrast, the recently developed glucagon like peptide-1-based therapy using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors has numerous beneficial effects in the management of hyperglycemia with less risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapy also lowers blood pressure and blood lipids and thus may prevent progression of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, glucagonlike peptide-1 receptors are abundantly expressed in vascular cells such as endothelial cells, monocyte/macrophages and smooth muscle cells. Recent studies suggest that the anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory properties of glucagon-like peptide-1 signaling on endothelial cells, its anti-inflammatory effect on macrophages and anti-proliferative effects on smooth muscle cells may halt atherosclerosis. Although large clinical trials are required to confirm these beneficial effects, glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapy could provide both glucose lowering and protection against cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Differentiating incretin-based therapies for population-based health care.

Incretin hormones, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), play a crucial role in modulating insulin and glucagon secretion, as well as regulating appetite, gastric emptying, and pancreatic beta cell function. The pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is complex and includes impaired incretin response, among other metabolic abnormalities. Incretin-based treatments for T2DM, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, mimic or prolong the actions of incretin hormones and function in a glucose-dependent manner, thereby reducing hyperglycemia and avoiding hypoglycemia. There are important mechanistic differences between the GLP-1 receptor agonists and the DPP-4 inhibitors. DPP-4 inhibitors protect endogenous GLP-1 from DPP-4 degradation, thereby achieving a physiologic level of GLP-1. In contrast, GLP-1 receptor agonists act directly on the GLP-1 receptor, achieving a pharmacologic level of GLP-1 activity. These different mechanisms yield different effects on diabetes and weight loss. Incretin-based treatments may improve beta cell function, and, while not indicated for these effects, GLP-1 receptor agonists may also promote satiety, reduce weight, slow gastric emptying, and possibly improve hypertension and triglyceride levels; these characteristics are absent with DPP-4 inhibitors. Therefore, GLP-1 receptor agonists can be an appropriate clinical choice for glycemic control in patients with T2DM, especially in those who would benefit from weight loss or are prone to hypoglycemia.

Dose-dependent effects of the once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the dose-response relationship of lixisenatide (AVE0010), a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, in metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 13 week study of 542 patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled [glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) > or = 7.0 and < 9.0% (> or = 53 and < 75 mmol/mol)] on metformin (> or = 1000 mg/day) treated with subcutaneous lixisenatide doses of 5, 10, 20 or 30 microg once daily or twice daily or placebo. The primary end-point was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to 13 weeks in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: Lixisenatide significantly improved mean HbA(1c) from a baseline of 7.55% (59.0 mmol/mol); respective mean reductions for 5, 10, 20 and 30 microg doses were 0.47, 0.50, 0.69 and 0.76% (5.1, 5.5, 7.5 and 8.3 mmol/mol), on once-daily and 0.65, 0.78, 0.75 and 0.87% (7.1, 8.5, 8.2 and 9.5 mmol/mol) on twice-daily administrations vs. 0.18% (2.0 mmol/mol) with placebo (all P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Target HbA(1c) < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at study end was achieved in 68% of patients receiving 20 and 30 microg once-daily lixisenatide vs. 32% receiving placebo (P < 0.0001). Dose-dependent improvements were observed for fasting, postprandial and average self-monitored seven-point blood glucose levels. Weight changes ranged from -2.0 to -3.9 kg with lixisenatide vs. -1.9 kg with placebo. The most frequent adverse event was mild-to-moderate nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Lixisenatide significantly improved glycaemic control in mildly hyperglycaemic patients with Type 2 diabetes on metformin. Dose-response relationships were seen for once- and twice-daily regimens, with similar efficacy levels, with a 20 microg once-daily dose of lixisenatide demonstrating the best efficacy-to-tolerability ratio. This new, once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist shows promise in the management of Type 2 diabetes to be defined further by ongoing long-term studies.

GLP-2 receptor agonism ameliorates inflammation and gastrointestinal stasis in murine postoperative ileus.

Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) is a pleiotropic intestinotrophic hormone that we hypothesized could lessen gastrointestinal inflammation associated with postoperative ileus (POI). To test this idea, the prophylactic timing and dose of a long-acting variant of human GLP-2 linked to the Fc portion of murine immunoglobulin G (IgG) (GLP-2/IgG) was optimized in a murine model of POI. Surgically treated mice received a single dose of GLP-2/IgG, IgG isotype control, or phosphate-buffered saline 1 to 48 h before small bowel surgical manipulation. The distribution of orally fed fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran and histological analyses of myeloperoxidase-positive immune cells were determined 24 and 48 h postoperatively. TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to determine early changes in mRNA expression in the muscularis or mucosa. In normal mice, prolonged exposure to GLP-2 increased upper gastrointestinal (GI) transit and mucosal weight. When administered 1 or 3 h before surgery, GLP-2/IgG reduced the leukocyte infiltrate 24 and 48 h postoperatively and improved GI transit 48 h postoperatively. Surgical manipulation rapidly increased gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines and enzymes for kinetically active mediators in the mucosa and muscularis. GLP-2/IgG2a affected the expression of genes associated with mucosal inflammation and barrier function. We conclude that prophylactic treatment with a long-acting GLP-2 agonist ameliorates inflammation and improves intestinal dysmotility associated with surgical manipulation of the bowel. The action of GLP-2 is consistent with a lessening of inflammation, leading to a more rapid recovery.

Advances in therapy for type 2 diabetes: GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is intrinsically connected to overweight and obesity. It is a complex metabolic disorder that predisposes patients to, and is associated with, cardiovascular disease. In addition to the triumvirate of core defects associated with T2DM (involvement of the pancreatic beta cell, the muscle, and the liver), other mechanisms including hyperglucagonemia, accelerated gastric emptying, and incretin deficiency/resistance are also involved. This has led to the development of incretinbased therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. These newer therapies have beneficial effects on glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, weight, and pancreatic beta-cell function.