Machine Learning-based Prediction Model for Treatment of Acromegaly With First-generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands.

CONTEXT: Artificial intelligence (AI), in particular machine learning (ML), may be used to deeply analyze biomarkers of response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) in the treatment of acromegaly. OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model of therapeutic response of acromegaly to fg-SRL. METHODS: Patients with acromegaly not cured by primary surgical treatment and who had adjuvant therapy with fg-SRL for at least 6 months after surgery were included. Patients were considered controlled if they presented growth hormone (GH) <1.0 ng/mL and normal age-adjusted insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels. Six AI models were evaluated: logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor classifier, support vector machine, gradient-boosted classifier, random forest, and multilayer perceptron. The features included in the analysis were age at diagnosis, sex, GH, and IGF-I levels at diagnosis and at pretreatment, somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and 5 (SST2 and SST5) protein expression and cytokeratin granulation pattern (GP). RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were analyzed. Controlled patients were older (P = .002), had lower GH at diagnosis (P = .01), had lower pretreatment GH and IGF-I (P < .001), and more frequently harbored tumors that were densely granulated (P = .014) or highly expressed SST2 (P < .001). The model that performed best was the support vector machine with the features SST2, SST5, GP, sex, age, and pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels. It had an accuracy of 86.3%, positive predictive value of 83.3% and negative predictive value of 87.5%. CONCLUSION: We developed a ML-based prediction model with high accuracy that has the potential to improve medical management of acromegaly, optimize biochemical control, decrease long-term morbidities and mortality, and reduce health services costs.

The position of combined medical treatment in acromegaly

ABSTRACT Advances in combination medical treatment have offer new perspectives for acromegaly patients with persistent disease activity despite receiving the available medical monotherapies. The outcomes of combination medical treatment may reflect both additive and synergistic effects. This review focuses on combination medical treatment and its current position in acromegaly, based on clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined medical treatment(s) and our own experiences with combination therapy. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):646-52

Brazilian multicenter study on pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the therapeutic response of acromegaly patients to pegvisomant (PEGV) in a real-life, Brazilian multicenter study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Characteristics of acromegaly patients treated with PEGV were reviewed at diagnosis, just before and during treatment. All patients with at least two IGF-I measurements on PEGV were included. Efficacy was defined as any normal IGF-I measurement during treatment. Safety data were reviewed. Predictors of response were determined by comparing controlled versus uncontrolled patients. RESULTS: 109 patients [61 women; median age at diagnosis 34 years; 95.3% macroadenomas] from 10 Brazilian centers were studied. Previous treatment included surgery (89%), radiotherapy (34%), somatostatin receptor ligands (99%), and cabergoline (67%). Before PEGV, median levels of GH, IGF-I and IGF-I % of upper limit of normal were 4.3 µg/L, 613 ng/mL, and 209%, respectively. Pre-diabetes/diabetes was present in 48.6% and tumor remnant in 71% of patients. Initial dose was 10 mg/day in all except 4 cases, maximum dose was 30 mg/day, and median exposure time was 30.5 months. PEGV was used as monotherapy in 11% of cases. Normal IGF-I levels was obtained in 74.1% of patients. Glycemic control improved in 56.6% of patients with pre-diabetes/diabetes. Exposure time, pre-treatment GH and IGF-I levels were predictors of response. Tumor enlargement occurred in 6.5% and elevation of liver enzymes in 9.2%. PEGV was discontinued in 6 patients and 3 deaths unrelated to the drug were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-life scenario, PEGV is a highly effective and safe treatment for acromegaly patients not controlled with other therapies.

The position of combined medical treatment in acromegaly.

Advances in combination medical treatment have offer new perspectives for acromegaly patients with persistent disease activity despite receiving the available medical monotherapies. The outcomes of combination medical treatment may reflect both additive and synergistic effects. This review focuses on combination medical treatment and its current position in acromegaly, based on clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined medical treatment(s) and our own experiences with combination therapy. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):646-52.

Novel gold nanoparticles coated with somatostatin as a potential delivery system for targeting somatostatin receptors.

Targeting of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) like somatostatin-14 (SST-14) could have a potential interest in delivery of anti-cancer agents to tumor cells. Attachment of SST to different nano-carriers e.g. polymeric nanoparticles is limited due to the difficulty of interaction between SST itself and those nano-carriers. Furthermore, the instability problems associated with the final formulation. Attaching of SST to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using the positive and negative charge of SST and citrate-AuNPs could be considered a new technique to get stable non-aggregated AuNPs coated with SST. Different analyses techniques have been performed to proof the principle of coating between AuNPs and SST. Furthermore, cellular uptake studies on HCC-1806, HELA and U-87 cell lines has been investigated to show the ability of AuNPs coated SST to enter the cells via SST receptors. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) indicated a successful coating of SST on the MUA-AuNPs surface. Furthermore, all the performed analysis including DLS, SDS-PAGE and UV-VIS absorption spectra indicated a successful coating of AuNPs with SST. Cellular uptake studies on HCC-1806, HELA and U-87 cell lines showed that the number of AuNPs-SST per cell is signiflcantly higher compared to citrate-AuNPs when quantified using inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. Moreover, the binding of AuNPs-SST to cells can be suppressed by addition of antagonist, indicating that the binding of AuNPs-SST to cells is due to receptor-specific binding. In conclusion, AuNPs could be attached to SST via adsorption to get stable AuNPs coated SST. This new formulation has a potential to target SST receptors localized in many normal and tumor cells.

Somatostatin and dopamine receptor interaction in prostate and lung cancer cell lines.

Somatostatin analogues inhibit in vitro cell proliferation via specific membrane receptors (SSTRs). Recent studies on transfected cell lines have shown a ligand-induced formation of receptor dimers. The aim of this study is 1) to evaluate the role of specific ligands in modulating receptor interactions in the androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, and in the non-small cell lung cancer line, Calu-6, by co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot; and 2) to correlate the antiproliferative effect of these compounds with their ability in modulating receptor interactions. In LNCaP, we have demonstrated the constitutive presence of sstr1/sstr2, sstr2/sstr5, sstr5/dopamine (DA) type 2 receptor (D2R), and sstr2/D2R dimers. BIM-23704 (sstr1- and sstr2-preferential compound) increased the co-immunoprecipitation of sstr1/sstr2 and significantly inhibited proliferation (-30.98%). BIM-23244 (sstr2-sstr5 selective agonist) significantly increased the co-immunoprecipitation of sstr2/sstr5, and induced a -41.36% inhibition of proliferation. BIM-23A760, a new somatostatin/DA chimeric agonist with a high affinity for sstr2 and D2R and a moderate affinity for sstr5, significantly increased the sstr5/D2R and sstr2/D2R complexes and was the most powerful in inhibiting proliferation (-42.30%). The chimeric compound was also the most efficient in modulating receptor interaction in Calu-6, increasing the co-immunoprecipitation of D2R/sstr5 and inhibiting cell proliferation (-30.54%). However, behind BIM-23A760, BIM-53097 (D2R-preferential compound) also significantly inhibited Calu-6 proliferation (-17.71%), suggesting a key role for D2R in receptor cross talk and in controlling cell growth. Indeed, activation of monomeric receptors did not affect receptor co-immunoprecipitation, whereas cell proliferation was significantly inhibited when the receptors were synergistically activated. In conclusion, our data show a dynamic ligand-induced somatostatin and DA receptor interaction, which may be crucial for the antiproliferative effects of the new analogues.

The role of melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptors in the voiding reflex in rats.

We have used the selective melanin-concentrating hormone-1 (MCH(1)) receptor antagonist SNAP 7941 [((+)-methyl (4S)-3-{[(3-{4-[3-(acetylamino)phenyl]-1-piperidinyl}propyl) amino]carbonyl}-4-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-6-(methoxymethyl)-2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-pyrimidinecarboxylate hydrochloride)] to investigate the role of the hypothalamic neuropeptide MCH in the control of voiding in rats. Intravenous administration of SNAP 7941 (3 and 10 mg/kg i.v.) produced dose-related inhibition of rhythmic, distension-induced voiding contractions in anesthetized rats. In conscious rats in which repeated voiding cycles were evoked by continuous slow transvesicular infusion of saline, intragastric SNAP 7941 [0.03-1 mg/kg intragastrically (i.g.)] produced sustained increases in infusion capacity (maximum = 220% basal), comparable with the effects of the 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) antagonist WAY 100635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide maleate salt), and the muscarinic antagonist, oxybutynin (4-diethylaminobut-2-ynyl 2-cyclohexyl-2-hydroxy-2-phenylacetate hydrochloride). SNAP 7941 produced similar results when administered at a low dose (0.01 nmol) into the lateral ventricle (intracerebroventricular). The opposite effect was produced when MCH (20 nmol) was delivered intracerebroventricularly, resulting in a 34% decrease in apparent bladder capacity with increased urinary frequency. The effect of MCH was blocked by the prior intragastric administration of SNAP 7941 (0.1 mg/kg), but oxybutynin (1 mg/kg) was ineffective. Finally, in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats, SNAP 7941 (0.1 mg/kg i.g.) produced a 31% reduction in micturition frequency, accompanied by a 36% increase in bladder capacity, with no effect on total volume voided over 6 h. The data indicate that MCH acts via MCH(1) receptors within the CNS to modulate the voiding reflex in rats. The striking effects of the MCH(1) antagonist SNAP 7941 to increase bladder capacity and reduce voiding frequency indicate that MCH(1) antagonists may offer a potential novel approach for treating overactive bladder syndrome.

Efficacy of chimeric molecules directed towards multiple somatostatin and dopamine receptors on inhibition of GH and prolactin secretion from GH-secreting pituitary adenomas classified as partially responsive to somatostatin analog therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the potency of a somatostatin receptor (sstr)2-sstr5 analog, BIM-23244, of an sstr2-dopamine D2 receptor (sstr2-DAD2) molecule, BIM-23A387 and of new somatostatin-dopamine chimeric molecules with differing, enhanced affinities for sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2, BIM-23A758, BIM-23A760 and BIM-23A761, to suppress GH and prolactin (PRL) from 18 human GH adenomas that are partially responsive to octreotide or lanreotide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2 mRNA levels were determined by RT-PCR. The effect of drugs was tested in cell cultures at various concentrations. RESULTS: In all tumors, the sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2 mRNA levels were coexpressed (mean levels+/-s.e.m. 0.4+/-0.1, 5.3+/-1.9 and 2.0+/-0.4 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase). In 13 tumors, the maximal suppression of GH secretion produced by BIM-23A387 (30+/-3%) and BIM-23244 (28+/-3%) was greater than that produced by octreotide (23+/-3%). In six out of 13 tumors, BIM-23A758, BIM-23A760 and BIM- 23A761 produced greater maximal suppression of GH secretion than octreotide (33+/-5, 38+/-2 and 41+/-2 vs 24+/-2%). Their EC(50) values were 10, 2 and 4 pmol/l. BIM-23A761 was more effective than BIM-23A387 in GH suppression (41+/-2 vs 32+/-4%). The new chimeric molecules produced maximal PRL suppression greater than octreotide (62+/-8 to 74+/-5 vs 46+/-11%). CONCLUSIONS: Novel dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecules with differing, enhanced activity at sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2, consistently produced significatly greater suppression of GH and PRL than either octreotide or single-receptor-interacting ligands in tumors from patients classified as only partially responsive to octreotide therapy. The higher efficacy of the chimeric compounds was, at least partially, linked to their high affinity for sstr2 (IC50 1-10 pmol/l). The other mechanisms by which such molecules produce an enhanced inhibition of GH remain to be elucidated.

Somatostatin receptor gene therapy combined with targeted therapy with radiolabeled octreotide: a new treatment for liver metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) on somatostatin receptor (SSR)-transfected colon carcinoma cells in a rat liver metastases model. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previously the authors have shown highly effective therapy with PRRT of SSR-positive tumors. This treatment is SSR-mediated; successful treatment is seen only in SSR-positive tumors, with no effect in SSR-negative tumors. As many tumors lack this receptor, the idea arose to transfect SSR-negative tumor cells with an SSR gene to apply PRRT on these SSR-transfected tumor cells. METHODS: CC531 colon carcinoma cells (SSR-negative) were transfected in vitro with an SSR (subtype 2) gene (CC2B). Liver metastases were produced after intraportal injection of these tumor cells in rats. On day 7, animals were treated with 185 or 370 MBq [177 Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3 ]octreotate. After 21 days rats were killed and liver metastases were counted. RESULTS: Treatment with 370 MBq [177 Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3 ]octreotate showed a significant antitumor response in rats with CC2B liver metastases (SSR-positive) in comparison with controls. No significant antitumor effect was seen in PRRT-treated rats with CC531 liver metastases (SSR-negative). Also, a dose-dependent tumor response was seen in rats with CC2B liver metastases treated with 185 MBq [ 177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3 ]octreotate compared with controls. In addition, rats with mixed liver metastases treated with 185 MBq [177 Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3 ]octreotate had significantly fewer metastases compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The authors showed an impressive antitumor effect of SSR (subtype 2)-transfected colon carcinoma cells with PRRT in a rat liver metastasis model. Moreover, rats with mixed liver metastases had significantly fewer liver metastases compared with control rats, which may be due to a radiologic bystander effect of [177 Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3 ]octreotate. This phenomenon is beneficial in the concept of in vivo gene therapy.

Therapeutic and diagnostic implications of the somatostatin system in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour disease.

Somatostatin exerts its actions through interaction with specific heptahelical G-protein coupled plasma membrane receptors. Five different somatostatin receptor subtypes have been cloned in man. Different receptor subtypes are coupled to different intracellular transmission cascades in a cell type-dependent manner. In general, somatostatin affects cell proliferation either directly: reducing mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, activating phosphoproteinphosphatase, stimulating EGF-receptors and adenylate cyclase activity; or indirectly reducing the release of autocrine- and/or paracrine-acting growth factors. Somatostatin can exert cytotoxic (G1 phase cell arrest) or cytostatic (apoptosis induction) effects, also depending on the receptor subtype expressed on the target cell. In gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours predominance of sst1 and sst2 with a lesser extent of sst3 and sst5 subtype receptors have been demonstrated using sensitive methods. Synthetic analogues with specific decreasing affinity for sst2 > sst5 > sst3 receptor subtypes have been used as antiproliferative drug in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic tumours. These compounds (octreotide, lanreotide) resulted in a modest growth-inhibition activity either in functioning or in non-functioning tumours. Combination of somatostatin analogues with alpha-interferon produced a more pronounced antiproliferative effect overcoming therapy resistance developed to either single drug. Finally, the development of radio-labelled somatostatin analogue scintigraphy has contributed to gastroenteropancreatic-tumours lesion localization and future more detailed knowledge of somatostatin receptor mechanisms could improve both the diagnostic and therapeutic application of somatostatin analogues.