Anti-inflammatory Effects of Variola Virus TNF Decoy Receptor in an Experimental Model of Contact Dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Large DNA poxviruses encode a diverse family of secreted proteins that modulate host inflammatory and antiviral responses, in particular by inhibiting one of the key players of the mammalian immune system, the tumor necrosis factor (TNF). METHODS: We investigated the effects of a recombinant variola (smallpox) virus TNF-decoy receptor (VARV-CrmB) in a murine model of contact dermatitis. Our results demonstrate that the VARV-CrmB protein significantly reduces the 2,4-dinitrochlorbenzene (DNCB)-induced migration of skin leukocytes during the sensitization phase and suppresses ear oedema during the elicitation phase of the contact reaction. RESULTS: Studies focusing on the bone marrow hematopoiesis in the contact dermatitis model revealed that the epicutaneous co-application of DNCB and VARV-CrmB protein normalized the DNCBinduced effects to control levels. CONCLUSION: As an effective TNF antagonist, the VARV-CrmB protein might be conceived as a beneficial candidate for further research and development of therapeutic approaches in the field of the inflammatory skin diseases.

The role of genetics and epigenetics in rheumatic diseases: are they really a target to be aimed at?

To date, numerous genetic and epigenetic studies have been performed and provided a crucial step forward in our understanding of the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases. However, most of the recent advances in the treatment of rheumatic diseases including biological therapies are not based on or even discrepant from these genetic and epigenetic findings. For example, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are quite successful in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Behçet's disease (BD), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) but not in that of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), conversely, RA shares genetic backgrounds more with SLE, SSc, SS and AAV than BD, AS and PsA. In this review, we briefly highlight the findings from recent genetic and epigenetic studies and discuss what needs to be studied to provide a novel, more efficacious management of rheumatic diseases.

Clinical Significance of Myeloid-Related Protein 8/14 as a Predictor for Biological Treatment and Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the serum level of Myeloid-Related Protein 8/14 complex (MRP8/14) and to predict and monitor the response to biologic treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: Each patient underwent clinical examination and blood sampling for assessment of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), rheumatoid factors (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibodies (anti-CCP), and serum concentrations of MRP8/14 protein complexes (myeloid-related proteins, MRP8/14) were measured at baseline, and weeks 4 and 12 (after initiation of treatment). RESULTS: Serum MRP8/14 protein complex levels correlated with DAS28 and anti-CCP antibody. MRP8/14 protein complex levels decreased significantly after 12 weeks treatment with biological therapy: mono-rhTNFR-Fc active group. rhTNFR-Fc plus methotrexate (MTX) decreased MRP8/14 protein complex levels from 11839±1849 ng/ml to 5423±1130 ng/ml (p<0.01) a reduction of 54.2% compared with 32.9% in the rhTNFR-Fc group. CONCLUSIONS: MRP8/14 protein complex levels were increased in active stage RA patients. MRP8/14 levels were decreased with rhTNFR-Fc treatment, suggesting serum concentrations of MRP8/14 protein complex might be a promising biomarker to predict responses to biological therapy in active RA patients at baseline and could be used to monitor responses to treatment across different mechanisms of action.

rhTNFR: Fc Suppresses the Development of Endometriosis in a Mouse Model by Downregulating Cell Proliferation and Invasiveness.

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), a proinflammatory cytokine, may play an important role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis; therefore, TNF-α inhibitors potentially have an effect on endometriosis. To investigate the effect of anti-TNF-α treatment on endometriosis, 2 TNF-α inhibitors: recombinant human TNF receptor: Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR: Fc) and TNF-α monoclonal antibody (TNF-α mAb) were used to treat human eutopic endometrial stromal cells (hESCs), and the effects on cell survival, cell cycle, and invasiveness were compared. It was found that rhTNFR: Fc suppressed the TNF-α-induced hESC survival and invasiveness but not TNF-α mAb. Recombinant human TNF receptor: Fc fusion protein decreased the S phase of hESC compared with the TNF-α-treated group. Then, we used a surgically induced mouse model of endometriosis to study the effect of rhTNFR: Fc treatment in vivo. The fluorescence intensity and the size of implanted endometriotic lesions in the mouse model were decreased by rhTNFR: Fc. In conclusion, rhTNFR: Fc suppresses hESC survival and invasiveness and decreases the fluorescence intensity and implant size in the mouse model of endometriosis.

Effects of sildenafil citrate and etanercept treatment on TNF-α levels in peripheral blood of women with recurrent miscarriage.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine serum concentrations of a proinflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), in patients with recurrent abortions undergoing treatment with sildenafil or etanercept. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Serum TNF-α concentrations were determined for 24 patients with recurrent miscarriages (aged 32.7 ± 4.64 years) deemed eligible for sildenafil therapy and 7 patients treated with etanercept (aged 37.65 ± 5.45 years). Measurements were performed before and after therapy. The control group included 10 healthy women (aged 33.3 ± 5.49 years), who gave birth at least once without pregnancy-related complications. The levels of serum TNF-α were measured by Elisa. RESULTS: Patients treated with etanercept had significantly elevated levels of TNF-α before therapy as compared to the control group (41.4 ± 28.4 vs. 16.6 ± 7.2 pg/ml). Moreover we found a tendency for the concentration of TNF-α to increase in sera of patients treated with sildenafil after therapy completion (19 ± 29 vs. 15.4 ± 26.7 pg/ml). Treatment with etanercept resulted in a significant reduction of serum TNF-α levels (41.4 ± 28.4 vs. 25.4 ± 3.2 pg/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy of recurrent abortions with anti-TNF-α drugs appears to be encouraging. Administration of blockers of phosphodiesterase type 5 or TNF-α blockers before conception seems to be a promising future therapy of immune-dependent recurrent miscarriages, limiting the teratogenic influence of the drugs on the fetus.

Adverse events resulting in withdrawal of biologic therapy for psoriasis in real-world clinical practice: A Canadian multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Safety profiles of biologics for treatment of psoriasis are limited to data from randomized controlled trials. There is a need for comparative safety reports of biologics based on data from clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: We sought to estimate and compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) leading to withdrawal of biologics (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab) in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective chart review from September 2005 to September 2014. Incidence proportion and rate of AEs leading to withdrawal by biologic agent and AE were calculated. RESULTS: For 545 treatments administered in 398 patients, 22 (4.04%) AEs were associated with withdrawal, for a rate of 1.97/100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-2.94). Common AEs were injection-/infusion-site reactions (0.55%, 0.92%, 0%, and 0% for etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab, respectively); infections (0%, 0.18%, 0.55%, 0.18%); and malignancies (0.18%, 0.18%, 0%, 0.37%). LIMITATIONS: Possible incompleteness of chart details and small study population limit the conclusiveness of findings. CONCLUSION: Biologic agents for treatment of psoriasis are safe; AEs associated with withdrawal occurred in 4% of all administered biologic therapies. It does not appear that real-world patients encounter more AEs with biologics than patients in clinical trials.

[Biological treatment in severe Still's disease--a case report]. / Leczenie biologiczne w ciqikiej postaci choroby Stilla--opis przypadku.

Still's disease and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are multisystem inflammatory diseases of unknown etiology, different disease course and prognosis. Still's disease is characterized by hectic fever, arthritis, skin rash, organomegaly, elevated serum ferritin and inflammatory factors. Early diagnosis and intensive treatment can prevent disease progression and reduce complications such as amyloidosis, physical disability. The first choice of treatment are high doses of corticosteroids and synthetic disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate (MTX), cyclosporine (CsA). Biologic agents are second line therapy when DMARDs aren't effective, e.g. monoclonal antibodies blocking the action of TNF-alpha (anti-TNF-α), interleukin-1 (ANK--anakinra) and interleukin-6 (TCZ--tocilizumab). We describe in details treatment strategies applied in a young woman with severe Still's disease treated with combination therapy of DMARDs and anti-TNF-α, including etanercept (ETA) or certolizumab (CER). TCZ was applied for the treatment of Still's disease following treatment failure with anti-TNF-α. We've achieved a complete remission of the Still's disease during treatment TCZ.

Etanercept in Alzheimer disease: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor etanercept is well tolerated and obtain preliminary data on its safety in Alzheimer disease dementia. METHODS: In a double-blind study, patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease dementia were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous etanercept (50 mg) once weekly or identical placebo over a 24-week period. Tolerability and safety of this medication was recorded including secondary outcomes of cognition, global function, behavior, and systemic cytokine levels at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and following a 4-week washout period. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2009-013400-31) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01068353). RESULTS: Forty-one participants (mean age 72.4 years; 61% men) were randomized to etanercept (n = 20) or placebo (n = 21). Etanercept was well tolerated; 90% of participants (18/20) completed the study compared with 71% (15/21) in the placebo group. Although infections were more common in the etanercept group, there were no serious adverse events or new safety concerns. While there were some interesting trends that favored etanercept, there were no statistically significant changes in cognition, behavior, or global function. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that subcutaneous etanercept (50 mg/wk) was well tolerated in this small group of patients with Alzheimer disease dementia, but a larger more heterogeneous group needs to be tested before recommending its use for broader groups of patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study shows Class I evidence that weekly subcutaneous etanercept is well tolerated in Alzheimer disease dementia.

Disease activity guided dose reduction and withdrawal of adalimumab or etanercept compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthritis: open label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a disease activity guided strategy of dose reduction of two tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, adalimumab or etanercept, is non-inferior in maintaining disease control in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with usual care. DESIGN: Randomised controlled, open label, non-inferiority strategy trial. SETTING: Two rheumatology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands, from December 2011 to May 2014. PARTICIPANTS: 180 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low disease activity using adalimumab or etanercept; 121 allocated to the dose reduction strategy, 59 to usual care. INTERVENTIONS: Disease activity guided dose reduction (advice to stepwise increase the injection interval every three months, until flare of disease activity or discontinuation) or usual care (no dose reduction advice). Flare was defined as increase in DAS28-CRP (a composite score measuring disease activity) greater than 1.2, or increase greater than 0.6 and current score of at least 3.2. In the case of flare, TNF inhibitor use was restarted or escalated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in proportions of patients with major flare (DAS28-CRP based flare longer than three months) between the two groups at 18 months, compared against a non-inferiority margin of 20%. Secondary outcomes included TNF inhibitor use at study end, functioning, quality of life, radiographic progression, and adverse events. RESULTS: Dose reduction of adalimumab or etanercept was non-inferior to usual care (proportion of patients with major flare at 18 months, 12% v 10%; difference 2%, 95% confidence interval -12% to 12%). In the dose reduction group, TNF inhibitor use could successfully be stopped in 20% (95% confidence interval 13% to 28%), the injection interval successfully increased in 43% (34% to 53%), but no dose reduction was possible in 37% (28% to 46%). Functional status, quality of life, relevant radiographic progression, and adverse events did not differ between the groups, although short lived flares (73% v 27%) and minimal radiographic progression (32% v 15%) were more frequent in dose reduction than usual care. CONCLUSIONS: A disease activity guided, dose reduction strategy of adalimumab or etanercept to treat rheumatoid arthritis is non-inferior to usual care with regard to major flaring, while resulting in the successful dose reduction or stopping in two thirds of patients.Trial registration Dutch trial register (www.trialregister.nl), NTR 3216.

Patient-tailored dose reduction of TNF-α blocking agents in ankylosing spondylitis patients with stable low disease activity in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) blocking agents are very effective in controlling systemic inflammation and improving clinical assessments in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In view of potential side effects and high costs of long-term treatment, our aim was to investigate whether dose reduction of TNF-α blocking agents is possible without loss of effectiveness in AS patients in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Patients from the prospective observational GLAS cohort, fulfilling the modified New York criteria for AS, with active disease before start of TNF-α blocking therapy and stable (≥6 months) low disease activity on the conventional dose regimen, who started with dose reduction of TNF-α blocking therapy before June 2011 were studied. Dose reduction was patient-tailored (step-by-step approach) and consisted of lowering the dose and/or extending the interval between doses. RESULTS: Between June 2005 and March 2011, 58 AS patients started dose reduction of etanercept (n=39), infliximab (n=10), or adalimumab (n=9). Of all patients, 74%, 62%, and 53% maintained their reduced dose or dosing frequency after 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The mean dose of TNF-α blocking therapy over time corresponded to 62% of the standard dose regimen. Disease activity remained low in the majority of patients who maintained dose reduction after 24 months (94% had BASDAI<4). If there was recurrence of disease symptoms, patients achieved good clinical response after returning to the conventional regimen (88% reached BASDAI<4). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational cohort, patient-tailored dose reduction of TNF-α blocking agents was successful preserving stable low disease activity over 24 months in approximately half of the AS patients.

Discontinuation of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and clinical outcomes in the Rheumatoid Arthritis DMARD Intervention and Utilisation Study 2 (RADIUS 2).

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this analysis was to examine discontinuation and reasons for discontinuation from disease-modifying anti-rheumatic (DMARD) therapies in the RADIUS 2 registry, a long-term, open-label, observational study of patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients who participated in RADIUS 2 initiated etanercept (ETN) therapy at study entry and were followed for 5 years. In this post hoc analysis, patients who had received ETN continuously from entry to month 4 were categorised by treatment at month 4: ETN monotherapy, ETN+methotrexate (MTX), ETN+MTX+other DMARDs (OTH), or ETN+OTH. Outcomes were assessed at month 4 and at the time of any subsequent treatment change, and included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). RESULTS: Of 3,484 patients analysed (982 ETN; 1,356 ETN+MTX; 537 ETN+MTX+OTH; 609 ETN+OTH), baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across treatments. No treatment change occurred in 62.3%, 49.9%, 33.3%, and 37.1% of ETN, ETN+MTX, ETN+MTX+OTH, and ETN+OTH patients, respectively. The mean time on therapy from month 4 was longer for patients receiving ETN (23.3 months) or ETN+MTX (23.7 months) than those receiving ETN+MTX+OTH (18.0 months) or ETN+OTH (18.3 months). The greatest improvements in CDAI and HAQ-DI were seen in patients who continued on ETN. The most common reasons for discontinuing DMARD therapy were cost and ineffective treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who had received ≥4 months of ETN continued on ETN throughout the 5-year observation period. Patients with greatest clinical and disability improvements tended to continue on ETN.

Major cost savings associated with biologic dose reduction in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

The purpose of this study was to explore whether patients with Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) (Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) or Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)) would remain in remission following a reduction in biologic dosing frequency and to calculate the cost savings associated with dose reduction. This prospective non-blinded non-randomised study commenced in 2010. Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis being treated with a biologic agent were screened for disease activity. A cohort of those in remission according to standardized disease activity indices (DAS28 < 2.6, BASDAI < 4) was offered a reduction in dosing frequency of two commonly used biologic therapies (etanercept 50 mg once per fortnight instead of weekly, adalimumab 40 mg once per month instead of fortnightly). Patients were assessed for disease activity at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following reduction in dosing frequency. Cost saving was calculated. 79 patients with inflammatory arthritis in remission were recruited. 57% had rheumatoid arthritis (n = 45), 13% psoriatic arthritis (n = 10) and 30% ankylosing spondylitis (n = 24). 57% (n = 45) were taking etanercept and 43% (n = 34) adalimumab. The percentage of patients in remission at 24 months was 56% (n = 44). This resulted in an actual saving to the state of approximately 600,000 euro over two years. This study demonstrates the reduction in biologic dosing frequency is feasible in Inflammatory Arthritis. There was a considerable cost saving at two years. The potential for major cost savings in biologic usage should be pursued further.