Comparison of the neuromuscular effects of two infusion rates of rocuronium in anesthetized pigs.

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blocking agents are frequently administered to pigs used for research. In humans, administration of the drugs is not without risk and may result in accidental awareness under general anaesthesia and postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade that can lead to serious respiratory complications. Despite the extensive administration, the pharmacodynamics of neuromuscular blocking agents are not thoroughly studied in pigs. Therefore, this study investigates the neuromuscular response of two infusion rates of rocuronium, a commonly used non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent. A group of 14 female Danish Landrace-Yorkshire-Duroc pigs used for supervised surgical training, weighing 40.3 ± 2.1 kg (mean ± SD), were included in the study. They received a loading dose of 0.85 mg/kg rocuronium intravenously followed by infusion of either 2.5 mg/kg/hour (L, low dose) or 5 mg/kg/hour (H, high dose) rocuronium for 30 min. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed with acceleromyography using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. Onset time, time to reappearance of T1, T4, TOF ratio 90% and 100% were recorded. RESULTS: All pigs in group H experienced loss of T1 throughout rocuronium infusion, whereas six out of seven pigs in group L had reappearance of T1 during rocuronium infusion, with additional reappearance of T4 in three of these pigs. The time to recovery of TOF ratio 90% was 14.0 ± 5.4 (L) and 21.7 ± 6.1 (H) minutes and recovery to TOF ratio 100% was 18.7 ± 6.5 (L) and 27.9 ± 9.2 min (H) (mean ± SD). Substantial inter-animal variation in neuromuscular recovery time was observed. CONCLUSION: The large inter-animal variation in pharmacodynamic profiles emphasizes that individual neuromuscular monitoring and titration to effect should be used routinely in research protocols that include rocuronium. In addition to other important measures, these actions are key in order to avoid overdosing and limit the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade.

The train-of-four or double-burst ratios cannot reliably exclude residual neuromuscular block in cats.

This study investigated the relationship between train-of-four (TOF) or double burst (DBS) ratios (T4:T1 or B2:B1) and twitch (T1) or burst (B1) magnitudes during the recovery from rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block in dogs and cats. The main hypothesis was that TOF or DBS ratios recover after the recovery of T1 or B1, and hence high ratio levels are sensitive indicators of restoration of the neuromuscular function. Six anesthetized dogs and six anesthetized cats received 0.5 mg/kg of rocuronium intravenously. The amplitudes of T1 or B1 were measured with mechanomyography during neuromuscular block until the neuromuscular function recovered fully. The TOF or DBS ratio was recorded concurrently. In dogs, recovery of T1 and B1 preceded the recovery of the TOF and DBS ratios, and T1 and B1 were always ≥90% of recovery when the respective ratio reached 0.9. In contrast, T1 was still depressed in 5/6 cats when the TOF ratio reached 0.9. At that moment, T1 was 72.5 ± 19.8% of recovery. Similarly, the DBS ratio returned to 0.9 when B1 was still <90% in 3/6 cats of recovery. The TOF and DBS fade in dogs consistently disappeared after the magnitude of T1 or B1 were restored, and hence, ratios ≥0.9 are a sensitive indicator that the neuromuscular function recovered. Our observation in cats however show that the spontaneous recovery of neither the TOF nor the DBS ratio of 0.9 can reliably exclude residual block, as the magnitude of T1 or B1 was still depressed in several instances.

Prolonged anesthesia using sevoflurane, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in a horse.

HISTORY: A 10-year old Arabian mare had a slow-growing mass on the lower right mandible and required a large partial mandibulectomy. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: No abnormalities were detected apart from the mass. MANAGEMENT: A temporary tracheostomy was performed pre-operatively. Anesthesia was induced with xylazine followed by ketamine and diazepam. For 13 hours, anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions, with the exception of surgical preparation time. Intra-operatively, ventilation was delivered through the cuffed tracheotomy tube. Heart and respiratory rates, ECG, arterial pressures, inspired and expired gases, pulse oximetry values and body temperature were monitored. Dobutamine and whole blood were necessary, and romifidine was used to control recovery. Post-operatively, phenylbutazone and buprenorphine given systemically and bupivacaine administered through a wound soaker catheter were used to provide analgesia. Head-shaking from buprenorphine was controlled with acepromazine and detomidine once standing after 87 minutes in recovery. For 3 days after surgery, analgesia was provided with butorphanol, phenylbutazone and bupivacaine. The mare recovered well, appeared comfortable and started eating the following day with no signs of ileus. FOLLOW-UP: Seven months later, the mare was doing well. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions were suitable for a long and invasive procedure.