The reasons for and mortality of patients unable to receive reimplantation after resection arthroplasty for chronic hip periprosthetic infection.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a feasible treatment for chronic PJI (periprosthetic joint infection) of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there are large numbers of patients who are unable to ultimately receive reimplantation after resection arthroplasty owing to uncontrolled infection and multiple comorbidities. The purpose of the current study was to identify patient-related risk factors and reasons for being unable to undergo revision THA. METHODS: Individuals undergoing resection arthroplasty for chronic PJI treatment from 2013 to 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. A variety of patient comorbidities, laboratory data, isolated pathogens, and follow-up status were collected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (46 men and 38 women) with a 2.7 ± 2.1-year follow-up were analyzed. Thirty-eight (45.2%) patients eventually underwent revision THA, while the other 46 (54.8%) did not receive reimplantation during follow-up. The patients without receiving reimplantation had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score (3.1 ± 2.9 versus 1.2 ± 1.5; p = 0.001). Lower cumulative incidence of receiving reimplantation was observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (log-rank test, p = 0.019), anemia (p = 0.011), presence of initial fever (p = 0.030), and oxacillin-resistant strain infection (p = 0.030). The most common reasons for not receiving reimplantation were uncontrolled infection, unstable medical conditions, and death. The patients without reimplantation had a relatively higher mortality rate (log-rank test, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Chronic hip PJI with poor medical conditions or oxacillin-resistant strain infection decreased the chance of undergoing revision surgery. These patients had unfavourable outcomes and a higher mortality rate after resection arthroplasty.

Variation in Surgeon Proficiency Scores and Association With Digit Replantation Outcomes.

Importance: Risk-adjusted variation in surgeon outcomes has been traditionally explained by surgeon volume and hospital infrastructure, yet it is unclear how a surgeon's operative proficiency directly contributes to their patients' outcomes. Objective: To assess the variation of surgeons' operative proficiency and investigate its association with surgical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series was a retrospective analysis of all digit replantations and revascularizations at a single US university medical center between January 2000 and August 2020. Surgeons were assigned a proficiency score based on the expected procedure difficulty and outcomes from a sample of their cases. Surgeon proficiency scores were then used to determine associations with outcomes from subsequent cases. The expected difficulty of each case was calculated using a novel scoring system that applied pooled relative risks from a meta-analysis of risk factors for replantation and revascularization failure. Exposures: Digit replantation and revascularization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Digit survival at 1-month follow up (case success) and number of complications. Results: A total of 145 patients and 226 digits were treated by 11 surgeons with training in hand or microsurgery (mean [SD] age, 41.9 [15.2] years; 204 [90%] men); there were 116 replantations and 110 revascularizations. Surgeon proficiency scores ranged from 1.3 to 5.7, with a mean (SD) of 3.4 (1.4). Case success rates among surgeons varied from 20.0% to 90.5%, with a mean (SD) of 64.9%. Higher proficiency scores were associated with fewer case failures: each point increase was associated with 40% decreased odds of failure (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94). Every 3-point increase in proficiency score was associated with 1 less complication (effect estimate, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.56 to 0.02). Surgeon proficiency score had a greater association with case failure than surgeon volume (16.7% vs 12.0%). The final model's association with case failure had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.93. Conclusions and Relevance: Operative proficiency varied widely among practicing surgeons and accounted for 17% of estimative ability for success of digit replantation and revascularization. Greater surgeon proficiency was associated with better outcomes, indicating that the value of surgical care may be optimized by improving surgeon proficiency.

A 17-Year Experience in Hand and Digit Replantation at an Academic Center.

BACKGROUND RESULTS: of replantation surgery following upper extremity traumatic amputation are extensively described in the literature, with success rates varying from 57 to 100 percent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate replantation success rate at a Level I trauma center over a 17-year period and to assess definable factors contributing to these results. METHODS: A retrospective review of all digit and hand replantations at a Level I trauma center was performed using CPT codes from 2001 through 2018. Descriptive analyses, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regressions were used. Significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Analysis consisted of 76 patients with 101 amputated parts (93 digits and eight hands). Fifty-six single digit amputations (30 percent success rate), 37 multidigit injuries (22 percent digit success rate), and eight hand amputations (50 percent success rate) were attempted. The overall success rate was 25 of 76 patients (33 percent) and 29 of 101 parts (29 percent). The most common mechanism of injury was laceration (n = 56), followed by crush (n = 30), and avulsion (n = 11), with repair of laceration-type injuries having the greatest success rate (36 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The authors report a lower success rate of hand and digit replantation than previously described in the literature. Whole hand and thumb replantations resulted in the highest survival rate in our series. Laceration mechanism showed a higher success rate than crush or avulsion-type injuries. The authors' modest results highlight the importance of effective internal auditing of low-volume replantation centers such as their own. Quality improvement measures are proposed for higher future success in replantation surgery at the authors' institution. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Rodeo Thumb: To Replant or Not.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of rodeo thumb amputation to guide clinical decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for rodeo thumb amputations from 2009 to 2019. Patient-reported outcomes were collected and compared by injury level, age, and treatment. Two-sided t test was used to compare continuous variables, and Pearson chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. RESULTS: The study included 37 patients. Patients with interphalangeal injuries treated with replantation had Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores similar to those treated with amputation (1 versus 8; p = 0.07). There was no significant difference in percentage of patients with similar or better roping ability after treatment (40 percent versus 79 percent; p = 0.26), and similar percentages were satisfied (80 percent versus 71 percent; p = 1.00). Patients with metacarpophalangeal injuries treated with replantation and those treated with amputation had similar questionnaire scores (7 versus 10; p = 0.47). Both groups had similar roping ability after treatment (67 percent versus 56 percent; p = 1.00), and there was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction (79 percent versus 44 percent; p = 0.34). Pediatric patients had questionnaire scores similar to those of adults (6 versus 8; p = 0.42). A significantly higher percentage of pediatric patients had similar roping ability following injury than adults (100 percent versus 54 percent; p = 0.02). Most patients in both groups were satisfied (89 percent versus 61 percent; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: For both interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal injuries, patient-reported outcomes were similar regardless of treatment. Children were able to return to roping and perform at a similar or higher level at a greater rate than adults, but had similar questionnaire scores and satisfaction.

National Population Study of the Effect of Structure and Process on Outcomes of Digit Replantation.

BACKGROUND: Surgeon experience, hospital volume, and teaching hospital status may play a role in the success of digit replantation. This study aims to analyze factors that influence digit replantation success rates. STUDY DESIGN: We examined patients with traumatic digit amputations, between 2000 and 2015, from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, which comprises data of more than 99% of its population. We measured the number of traumatic digit amputations and success rate of replantation. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used for descriptive statistics. Regression models were built to analyze the association among patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, and replant success. RESULTS: We identified 13,416 digit replantation patients using the eligibility criteria. The overall replantation failure rate was significantly higher in medium- and high-volume hospitals (low-volume: 11%, medium-volume: 17%, and high-volume: 15%, p < 0.001). Teaching hospitals had significantly higher replantation failure rates [(15.5% vs 7.6%), odds ratio (OR) 2.0; confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.7]. Lower surgeon case volume resulted in a significantly higher failure rate in the thumb replantation (OR 0.89; CI 0.85-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Teaching hospitals had greater odds of replantation failure, owing to being high volume centers and attempting more replantations. However, the effect of residents performing the replantation during their training should be considered. Teaching units are mandatory for resident training; however, a balance should be established to provide training, but with sufficient supervision to achieve optimal replant success. A national protocol to triage digit amputation cases to high volume centers with experienced microsurgeons will help improve the replantation success rate.

The French National Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Cochlear explantation and reimplantation.

This study aims to determine the frequency and causes of cochlear explants with re-implantation (ERI) after 5 years' follow up of the patients included in the French national EPIIC (étude post-inscription des implants cochléaires) registry tracking patients with cochlear implantation. This multicenter, descriptive prospective study was conducted on 5051 patients enrolled in the EPIIC database between January 2012 and December 2016. Ninety-five patients (1.9%) received a primary implant and an ERI during the study. Of these, four benefitted from two ERIs. The number of ERIs was significantly higher in the pediatric population than among adults. The explantation and reimplantation were performed simultaneously in 86% of cases. The reasons for explantation were: in 46.4% of cases linked to a malfunction of the implant, and in 39.3% of cases for medical or surgical reasons. The number of electrodes inserted was significantly higher after the ERI than after the first implantation. There was just one post-ERI infection for these 95 explanted and re-implanted patients. As well as explantation with reimplantation rarely being necessary, it generally presents no major surgical difficulty and in most cases it allows a better integration than in the first implantation.

Upper extremity replantation and revascularization in Finland between 1998 and 2016.

Emergency replantation and revascularization operations of upper extremity injuries demand considerable resources, but their actual occurrence is unknown. This study evaluated all emergency replantations and revascularizations in the upper extremity in Finland from 1998 to 2016. A total of 2,434 operations were identified within the study period. The average number of operations per year was 128 which corresponds with 2.4 operations per 100,000 person years. Operations were most common in persons aged 20 to 59 years and the rate of operations ranged from 1.4 to 5.0 per 100,000 person years. Thirteen percent of the patients were women and 87% were men. This study shows rates of emergency replantation and revascularization operations in upper extremity injuries and proves that the rates have been constant over the past 19 years in Finland.

Bone defect reconstruction with autologous bone inactivated with liquid nitrogen after resection of primary limb malignant tumors: An observational study.

Surgical treatment of malignant bone tumors comprises tumor resection and reconstruction. The most commonly used reconstruction method is prosthesis replacement, which achieves good early function, but has a high long-term incidence of complications. Another reconstruction option is autologous bone replantation, which has the advantages of anatomical matching and no need for large bone bank support. Few studies have evaluated reconstruction with liquid nitrogen-inactivated autogenous bone.The present study aimed to evaluate the oncological results, bone healing results, complications, and indications of reconstruction with liquid nitrogen-inactivated autogenous bone grafts.The study population comprised 21 consecutive patients. The tumor site was the tibia in 9 cases, femur in 8, and humerus in 4. There were 37 osteotomy ends in total. After freezing and rewarming, the medullary cavity of the autogenous bone was filled with antibiotic bone cement. Seventeen patients received bilateral plate fixation, 2 received intramedullary nail and distal plate fixation, and 2 received single plate fixation.The average follow-up was 31 ±â€Š6 months. Eighteen patients survived without tumors, and the 3-year survival rate was 80.4%. All cases had adequate surgical margins, but recurrence developed in 1 patient. Metastasis occurred in 3 patients, who all died of metastasis. Intraoperative inactivated bone fracture occurred in 1 patient, and screw breakage was found in 1 patient. Nonunion occurred at 1 humeral diaphysis osteotomy site, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up; the average healing time of the other 35 ends was 13 ±â€Š6 months, and the bone healing rate was 97.2%. The average bone healing times in the metaphysis and diaphysis were 9 ±â€Š3 months and 15 ±â€Š6 months (P = .003). The average bone healing times in the upper and lower limbs were 16.6 ±â€Š7.4 months and 12.3 ±â€Š5.8 months (P = .020). The average Muscle and Skeletal Tumor Society score was 28 ±â€Š3 (21-30) in the 18 survivors.Liquid nitrogen-inactivated autologous bone replantation for primary malignant limb tumor was safe and effective, as shown by the relatively low complication rate, high bone healing rate, and satisfactory postoperative function. This is a reliable biological reconstruction method for malignant bone tumors with specific site and bone destruction characteristics.

Acute Distal Femoral Replacement for Fractures About the Knee in the Elderly.

Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a reasonable treatment option when used for select indications. In the setting of comminuted intra-articular distal femoral fractures, distal femoral arthroplasty should be considered in low-demand patients with poor bone quality. This article summarizes the existing literature plus the authors' personal experience with DFR use for distal femoral fractures of the native knee.

Postoperative bladder dysfunction and outcomes after minimally invasive extravesical ureteric reimplantation in children using a laparoscopic and a robot-assisted approach: results of a multicentre international survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare postoperative bladder dysfunction rates and outcomes after laparoscopic and robot-assisted extravesical ureteric reimplantation in children and to identify risk factors associated with bladder dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 children underwent minimally invasive extravesical ureteric reimplantation in five international centres of paediatric urology over a 5-year period (January 2013-January 2018). The children were divided in two groups according to surgical approach: group 1 underwent laporoscopic reimplantation and included 116 children (92 girls and 24 boys with a median age of 4.5 years), while group 2 underwent robot-assisted reimplantation and included 35 children (29 girls and six boys with a median age of 7.5 years). The two groups were compared with regard to: procedure length; success rate; postoperative complication rate; and postoperative bladder dysfunction rate (acute urinary retention [AUR] and voiding dysfunction). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of postoperative bladder dysfunction. Factors assessed included age, gender, laterality, duration of procedure, pre-existing bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) and pain control. RESULTS: The mean operating time was significantly longer in group 2 compared with group 1, for both unilateral (159.5 vs 109.5 min) and bilateral procedures (202 vs 132 min; P = 0.001). The success rate was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (100% vs 95.6%; P = 0.001). The overall postoperative bladder dysfunction rate was 8.6% and no significant difference was found between group 1 (6.9%) and group 2 (14.3%; P = 0.17). All AUR cases were managed with short-term bladder catheterization except for two cases (1.3%) in group 1 that required short-term suprapubic catheterization. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that bilateral pathology, pre-existing BBD and duration of procedure were predictors of postoperative bladder dysfunction (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed that short-term bladder dysfunction is a possible complication of extravesical ureteric reimplantation, with no significant difference between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches. Bladder dysfunction occurred more often after bilateral repairs, but required suprapubic catheterization in only 1.3% of cases. Bilaterality, pre-existing BBD and duration of surgery were confirmed on univariate and multivariate analyses as predictors of postoperative bladder dysfunction in this series.

Surgical repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: A retrospective study comparing the management of long-gap esophageal atresia in the Nordic countries.

BACKGROUND: Several surgical procedures have been described in the reconstruction of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We reviewed the surgical methods used in children with LGEA in the Nordic countries over a 15-year period and the postoperative complications within the first postoperative year. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter medical record review of all children born with Gross type A or B esophageal atresia between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2014 reconstructed within their first year of life. RESULTS: We included 71 children; 56 had Gross type A and 15 type B LGEA. Delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) was performed in 52.1% and an esophageal replacement procedure in 47.9%. Gastric pull-up (GPU) was the most frequent procedure (25.4%). The frequency of chromosomal abnormalities, congenital heart defects and other anomalies was significantly higher in patients who had a replacement procedure. The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was significantly higher after DPA compared to esophageal replacement (p = 0.013). At 1-year follow-up the mean body weight was higher after DPA than after organ interposition (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: DPA and esophageal replacement procedures were equally applied. Postoperative complications and follow-up were similar except for the development of GER and the body weight at 1-year follow-up. Long-term results should be investigated. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Comparisons between long-term outcomes of the use of reposition flaps and replantations in fingertip amputations.

BACKGROUND: Replantation is the gold standard procedure for traumatic amputation of fingertips. Reposition flap procedure is performed using nail-bone complex as a free graft and covering graft site with a flap to preserve original finger length, nail complex, and sensory functions of fingertip in pateints where microsurgical methods cannot be applied. In our study, we aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with amputated fingertips who underwent replantation or reposition flap procedures. METHODS: Thirty-five patients of replantation and 28 patients of reposition flap procedures only for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th fingertip amputations were included in the study. Complete fingertip amputations involved Foucher zones 2 and 3. The patients were followed up postoperatively for a median period of 13 months (9-23 months). All patients were assessed with static and dynamic 2-point discrimination tests, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and cold intolerance test for the development of neuroma on the donor site. RESULTS: In 5 patients, replantation procedure failed. In such failed patients, after the removal of necrotic tissues, the stump was either repaired or reconstruction with a flap was applied. Wound dehiscence was observed at the lateral sides of the flaps in 2 patients who underwent reposition procedures. CONCLUSION: Reposition flap repair can be a good cost-effective alternative to other fingertip repair procedures in appropriately selected patients who are not amenable to microsurgery. It preserves the length and sensory functions of fingertips and enables patients to return to their daily life as soon as possible.

Finger Replantation Optimization Study (FRONT): Update on National Trends.

PURPOSE: Traumatic digit amputations have an adverse impact on patients' daily living. Despite experts advocating for digit replantation, studies have shown a continued decrease in rate of replantation. We performed a national-level investigation to examine the recent trend of practice for digital replantation. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample database under the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to select adult patients with traumatic digit amputation from 2001 to 2014. We calculated the rate of attempted and rate of successful digit replantation per year, subcategorizing for digit type (thumb or finger) and for hospital type (rural, urban nonteaching, or urban teaching). We also analyzed the pattern of distribution of case volume to each hospital type per year. We used 2 multivariable logistic regression models to investigate patient demographic and hospital characteristics associated with the odds of replantation attempt and success. RESULTS: Among the 14,872 adult patients with a single digit amputation from 2001 to 2014, only 1,670 (11.2%) underwent replantation. The rate of replantation attempt trended down over the years for both thumb and finger injuries at all hospital types, despite increasing proportions of cases being sent to urban teaching hospitals where they were more than twice as likely to undergo replantation. The rate of successful replantation stayed stable for the thumb at 82.9% and increased for fingers from 76.1% to 82.4% over the years. Patients were more likely to undergo replantation if they had private insurance or a higher level of income. Neither hospital case volume nor hospital type was predictive of successful replantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although more single-digit amputations were treated by urban teaching hospitals with higher likelihood to replant, the downward trend in rate of attempt regardless of hospital type demonstrates that concentration of case volume is not the solution to reverse the declining trend. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Financial aspects of digit replantation need to be considered from both the patients' and the surgeons' perspectives to improve delivery of care for digit replantation.

Telemetry in intracranial pressure monitoring: sensor survival and drift.

BACKGROUND: Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring enable long-term ICP monitoring on patients during normal day activities and may accordingly be of use during evaluation and treatment of complicated ICP disorders. However, the benefits of such equipment depend strongly on the validity of the recordings and how often the telemetric sensor needs to be re-implanted. This study investigates the clinical and technical sensor survival time and drift of the telemetric ICP sensor: Raumedic Neurovent-P-tel. METHODS: Implanted telemetric ICP sensors in the period from January 2011 to December 2017 were identified, and medical records reviewed for complications, explantation reasons, and parameters relevant for determining clinical and technical sensor survival time. Explanted sensors were tested in an experimental setup to study baseline drift. RESULTS: In total, implantation of 119 sensors were identified. Five sensors (4.2%) were explanted due to skin damage, three (2.5%) due to wound infection, and two (1.7%) due to ethylene oxide allergy. No other complications were observed. The median clinical sensor survival time was 208 days (95% CI 150-382). The median technical sensor survival time was 556 days (95% CI 382-605). Explanted sensors had a median baseline drift of 2.5 mmHg (IQR 2.0-5.5). CONCLUSION: In most cases, the ICP sensor provides reliable measurements beyond the approved implantation time of 90 days. Thus, the sensor should not be routinely removed after this period, if ICP monitoring is still indicated. However, some sensors showed technical malfunction prior to the CE-approval, underlining that caution should always be taken when analyzing telemetric ICP curves.

Three-year (2014-2016) activity report of the Replantation Service for hand amputations in Poland.

The paper summarizes 32 months (January 2014 - August 2016) of activity of the Replantation Service for hand amputation in Poland. Over this period a total of 568 cases of total and subtotal amputations as well as other complex injuries to the hand were referred. Of these, 354 referrals (62%) were accepted and 214 (38%) rejected. Among accepted, there were 167 total (47%) and 142 subtotal (40%) amputations; 45 patients (13%) had other severe hand injuries. Vast majority of the patients constituted males aged a mean of 39 years. The most common injury was amputation of several digits in one patient, and thumb amputation - a total of 229 cases (65%), followed by transmetacarpal and wrist amputations - 92 (30%) and forearm/arm amputations - 33 cases (9%). Replantation of amputated extremity was performed in 141 patients (40%), revascularization in 145 (41%) and in 29 (8%) primary repair of the complex injuries. In 27 cases (8%), a coverage of the tissue defects, and in 12 (3%) primary terminalization was performed. Survival rate was of 78% for replantation and revascularization. Comparing to the period 2010-2012, an increase in number of treated patients (of n=64 cases), in number of amputations (of 96 cases) and in number of amputated digits (of 88 cases) were noted. The activity report shows importance of Replantation Service, an informal structure, in saving limbs of severely mutilated patients.

Deep circumferential annuloplasty as an adjunct to repair regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves with a dilated annulus.

BACKGROUND: Failure to address the functional aortic annulus during bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair has led to early repair failures. The pathology of regurgitant BAV involves annular dilatation, which is more pronounced anteriorly and deep toward the muscular interventricular septum. In this study, we assessed the results of BAV repair using a strategy of deep circumferential annular support involving the septum in patients with a dilated annulus (>26 mm) and moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR). METHODS: Between February 1999 and June 2015, 100 patients with regurgitant (≥2+) BAV and a dilated ventriculoaortic junction (VAJ) (≥26 mm) underwent repair with an adjunctive circumferential annuloplasty (reimplantation procedure or ring). External root dissection to accommodate the annuloplasty was carried deep onto the anterior aspect of the interventricular septum. Follow up was complete in 96 patients, with a median follow-up of 31 months and a total of 362 patient-years. Cox regression analysis was used to predict recurrence of AR. RESULTS: The mean VAJ diameter was 30 ± 4 mm. Seventy-nine patients exhibited delayed prolapse of the anterior leaflet (conjoined right and left cusps in Siever type 1 or anterior cusp in Siever type 0), and 93 patients underwent reimplantation. In the entire study group, there were no in-hospital deaths, and only 1 patient had 2+ AR on discharge. There was 1 late noncardiac death. At 8 years, freedom from AR ≥2+ was 96.4% and freedom from reoperation was 96.8%. Higher preoperative AR grade, small graft size, and use of a ring were predictive of recurrent AR. CONCLUSIONS: Regurgitant BAVs with a dilated annulus display anterior cusp prolapse toward the septum. A deep circumferential annuloplasty may help maintain repair durability.

A systemic review and meta-analysis: long-term results of the Bentall versus the David procedure in patients with Marfan syndrome.

This systemic review of the literature and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current state of the evidence for and against reimplantation of the aortic valve (RAV) versus the composite valve graft (CVG) intervention in patients with Marfan syndrome. Random effects meta-regression was performed across the study arms with logit-transformed proportions of in-hospital deaths as an outcome measure when possible. Results are presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and P-values. Other outcomes are summarized with medians, interquartile ranges (IQR) and ranges and the numbers of patients at risk. Twenty retrospective studies that included a combined 2156 patients with long-term follow-up were identified for analysis after a literature search. The in-hospital mortality rate favoured the RAV procedure with an odds ratio of 0.23 [95% CI 0.09-0.55, P = 0.001]. The survival rate at mid-term for the RAV cohort was 96.7% (CI 94.2-98.5) vs. 86.4% (CI 82.8-89.6) for the CVG group and 93.1% (CI 66.4-100) for the RAV group vs. 82.6% (CI 74.9-89.2) for the CVG group for the long term. Freedom from valve-related reintervention (median percentages) for the long term was 97.6% (CI 90.3-100%) for the RAV procedure and 88.6% (CI 79.1-95.5) for a CVG. This systematic review of the literature stresses the advantages of the RAV procedure in patients with Marfan syndrome in regard to long- and short-term results as the treatment of choice in aortic root surgery. The RAV procedure reduces in-hospital as well as long-term deaths and protects against aortic valve reintervention.

Incidence, Timing, and Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Primary Revision of Traumatic Digit Amputations.

PURPOSE: Primary revision amputation is the most common treatment method for traumatic digit amputations in the United States. Few studies have reported secondary revision rates after primary revision amputation. The primary aim of our study was to identify risk factors for secondary revision within 1 year of the index procedure. Secondarily, we describe the incidence and timing of complications requiring secondary revision. METHODS: Our institution's emergency department (ED) database was reviewed for traumatic digit amputations over a 6-year period. Patients were reviewed for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, site of treatment (ED versus operating room), and complications requiring secondary revision. Conditional Cox Proportional Hazard regression was used to model hazard of revision within 1 year of index procedure relative to site of initial management, mechanism of injury, injury characteristics, and patient demographics. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-seven patients with 677 digits were managed with primary revision amputation. Five hundred and eighty-six digits (86.6%) were revised in the ED, and 91 (13.4%) in the operating room. Ninety-one digits required secondary revision, including 83 within 1 year. No increased risk of secondary revision amputation within 1 year of the index procedure was observed for patients treated in the ED compared with the operating room. Relative to crush injuries, bite and sharp laceration amputations had 4.8 times and 2.6 times increased risk of secondary revision, respectively. The index finger had a 5.3-fold increased risk of revision with the thumb as the reference digit. Work-related injuries had a 1.9-fold increased risk of secondary revision compared with non-work-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found indicating that traumatic digit amputations primarily revised in the ED had an increased risk of secondary revision. Patients may be counseled on the risk of secondary procedures based on the mechanism of injury, injury characteristics and demographics, as well as the timing of complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Valve-sparing root replacement for freestanding pulmonary autograft aneurysm after the Ross procedure.

OBJECTIVE: Autograft dilatation is the main long-term complication following the Ross procedure using the freestanding root replacement technique. We reviewed our 25-year experience with the Ross procedure with a special emphasis on valve-sparing reoperations. METHODS: From 1991 to 2016, 153 patients (29.6 ± 16.6 years; 29.4% pediatric) underwent a Ross operation at our institution with implantation of the autograft as freestanding root replacement. The follow-up is 98.7% complete with a mean of 12.2 ± 5.5 years. RESULTS: Mortality at 30-days was 2.0%. Echocardiography documented no or trivial aortic regurgitation in 99.3% of the patients at discharge. Survival probability at 20 years was 85.4%. No case of autograft endocarditis occurred. Autograft deterioration rate was 2.01% per patient-year, and freedom from autograft reoperation was 75.3% at 15 years. A reoperation for autograft aneurysm was required in 35 patients (22.9%) at a mean interval of 11.1 ± 4.6 years after the Ross procedure. A valve-sparing root replacement was performed in 77% of patients, including 10 David and 17 Yacoub procedures with no early mortality. Three patients required prosthetic valve replacement within 2 years after a Yacoub operation. At latest follow-up, 92% of all surviving patients still carry the pulmonary autograft valve. Freedom from autograft valve replacement was 92.1% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using the David or Yacoub techniques, the autograft valve can be preserved in the majority of patients with root aneurysms after the Ross procedure. Reoperations can be performed with no early mortality, a good functional midterm result, and an acceptable reintervention rate.