Application of placing the anterior end of endotracheal tube at the glottis in laryngeal mask airway positive ventilation during general anesthesia: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Glottic contraction and closure causes ventilation obstruction and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) leakage during positive pressure ventilation using LMA. This study aimed to assess the effect of placing the anterior end of the endotracheal tube (ET) at the glottis through the LMA ventilation conduit on treating LMA leakage following glottic contraction and closure. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, patients with non-minor surgery using LMA ventilation were randomly allocated to the i-gel group (group L) and the i-gel combined with ET group (group LE). The tip of ET was placed 2 cm under glottis guided by fiberoptic bronchoscope through i-gel ventilation conduit in group LE. The perioperative incidence of i-gel leakage, the changes of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) following artificial airway insertion, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Perioperative i-gel leakage was observed in 7 of 48 patients (14.6%) in group L and 1 of 49 patients (2.0%) in group LE. There was significant difference in the incidence of leakage between the 2 groups (P = .031). SBP and HR after ET insertion in group LE increased significantly compared to those in group L (P < .05/5). The values of both SBP and HR after ET insertion did not exceed the basic values in group LE (P > .05/4). There were no significant differences in the incidence and severity of postoperative sore pain and hoarseness, cough during i-gel and ET removal between the 2 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Placing the anterior end of ET at the glottis reduced LMA air leakage related to glottic contraction and closure in non-minor surgery. The ET placing had low stress response and did not significantly increase postoperative complications.

Comparing oxygen therapies for hypoxemia prevention during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Hypoxemia is the most frequent adverse event observed during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation. An optimum oxygen therapy has still not been conclusively determined. DESIGN: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. SETTING: Digestive Endoscopy Center. PATIENTS: Adults (≥18 years old and of both sexes) during gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation. INTERVENTIONS: Pubmed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov. were searched until June 30, 2023. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing any oxygen therapy with another oxygen therapy or with placebo (nasal cannula, NC) were included. MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as the pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2). Random-effects network meta-analyses were performed. Data are reported as odds ratios (OR), prediction intervals (PrI) and 95% CI. Bias risk was evaluated following the guidelines outlined by the Cochrane Collaboration. The quality of evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. MAIN RESULTS: We included 27 RCTs with a total of 7552 patients. Compared to the use of NC, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) demonstrated superior efficacy in mitigating hypoxemia (NIPPV vs. NC, OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.08-0.31, 95% PrI: 0.06-0.41), followed by Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) (WNJT vs. NC, OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.10-0.30, 95% PrI: 0.07-0.42). The efficacy for preventing hypoxemia was ranked as follows: NIPPV > WNJT > oropharynx/nasopharyngeal catheter > high-flow nasal oxygenation > nasal mask > NC. CONCLUSIONS: During gastrointestinal endoscopy under procedural sedation, all other advanced oxygen therapies were found to be more efficacious than nasal cannula. NIPPV and WNJT appear to be the most efficacious oxygen therapy for preventing hypoxemia. Additionally, clinicians should make a choice regarding the most suitable oxygen therapy based on the risk population, type of endoscopy and adverse events.

Speed of lung inflation at birth influences the initiation of lung injury in preterm lambs.

Gas flow is fundamental for driving tidal ventilation and, thus, the speed of lung motion, but current bias flow settings to support the preterm lung after birth do not have an evidence base. We aimed to determine the role of gas bias flow rates to generate positive pressure ventilation in initiating early lung injury pathways in the preterm lamb. Using slower speeds to inflate the lung during tidal ventilation (gas flow rates 4-6 L/min) did not affect lung mechanics, mechanical power, or gas exchange compared with those currently used in clinical practice (8-10 L/min). Speed of pressure and volume change during inflation were faster with higher flow rates. Lower flow rates resulted in less bronchoalveolar fluid protein, better lung morphology, and fewer detached epithelial cells. Overall, relative to unventilated fetal controls, there was greater protein change using 8-10 L/min, which was associated with enrichment of acute inflammatory and innate responses. Slowing the speed of lung motion by supporting the preterm lung from birth with lower flow rates than in current clinical use resulted in less lung injury without compromising tidal ventilation or gas exchange.

Effect of lung volume preservation during spontaneous breathing trial on successful extubation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: protocol for a multicenter clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In standard weaning from mechanical ventilation, a successful spontaneous breathing test (SBT) consisting of 30 min 8 cmH2O pressure-support ventilation (PSV8) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is followed by extubation with continuous suctioning; however, these practices might promote derecruitment. Evidence supports the feasibility and safety of extubation without suctioning. Ultrasound can assess lung aeration and respiratory muscles. We hypothesize that weaning aiming to preserve lung volume can yield higher rates of successful extubation. METHODS: This multicenter superiority trial will randomly assign eligible patients to receive either standard weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 without PEEP followed by extubation with continuous suctioning] or lung-volume-preservation weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 + 5 cmH2O PEEP followed by extubation with positive pressure without suctioning]. We will compare the rates of successful extubation and reintubation, ICU and hospital stays, and ultrasound measurements of the volume of aerated lung (modified lung ultrasound score), diaphragm and intercostal muscle thickness, and thickening fraction before and after successful or failed SBT. Patients will be followed for 90 days after randomization. DISCUSSION: We aim to recruit a large sample of representative patients (N = 1600). Our study cannot elucidate the specific effects of PEEP during SBT and of positive pressure during extubation; the results will show the joint effects derived from the synergy of these two factors. Although universal ultrasound monitoring of lungs, diaphragm, and intercostal muscles throughout weaning is unfeasible, if derecruitment is a major cause of weaning failure, ultrasound may help clinicians decide about extubation in high-risk and borderline patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) of the Fundació Unió Catalana d'Hospitals approved the study (CEI 22/67 and 23/26). Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in August 2023. Identifier: NCT05526053.

Effects of starting one lung ventilation and applying individualized PEEP right after patients are placed in lateral decubitus position on intraoperative oxygenation for patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients receiving one lung ventilation in thoracic surgery, numerous studies have proved the superiority of lung protective ventilation of low tidal volume combined with recruitment maneuvers (RM) and individualized PEEP. However, RM may lead to overinflation which aggravates lung injury and intrapulmonary shunt. According to CT results, atelectasis usually forms in gravity dependent lung regions, regardless of body position. So, during anesthesia induction in supine position, atelectasis usually forms in the dorsal parts of lungs, however, when patients are turned into lateral decubitus position, collapsed lung tissue in the dorsal parts would reexpand, while atelectasis would slowly reappear in the lower flank of the lung. We hypothesize that applying sufficient PEEP without RM before the formation of atelectasis in the lower flank of the lung may beas effective to prevent atelectasis and thus improve oxygenation as applying PEEP with RM. METHODS: A total of 84 patients scheduled for elective pulmonary lobe resection necessitating one lung ventilation will be recruited and randomized totwo parallel groups. For all patients, one lung ventilation is initiated the right after patients are turned into lateral decubitus position. For patients in the study group, individualized PEEP titration is started the moment one lung ventilation is started, while patients in the control group will receive a recruitment maneuver followed by individualized PEEP titration after initiation of one lung ventilation. The primary endpoint will be oxygenation index measured at T4. Secondary endpoints will include intrapulmonary shunt, respiratory mechanics, PPCs, and hemodynamic indicators. DISCUSSION: Numerous previous studies compared the effects of individualized PEEP applied alone with that applied in combination with RM on oxygenation index, PPCs, intrapulmonary shunt and respiratory mechanics after atelectasis was formed in patients receiving one lung ventilation during thoracoscopic surgery. In this study, we will apply individualized PEEP before the formation of atelectasis while not performing RM in patients allocated to the study group, and then we're going to observe its effects on the aspects mentioned above. The results of this trial will provide a ventilation strategy that may be conductive to improving intraoperative oxygenation and avoiding the detrimental effects of RM for patients receiving one lung ventilation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2400080682. Registered on February 5, 2024.

Impaired oxygenation after lung resection: Incidence and perioperative risk factors.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of postoperative oxygenation impairment after lung resection in the era of lung-protective management, and to identify perioperative factors associated with that impairment. DESIGN: Registry-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two large academic hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: 3081 ASA I-IV patients undergoing lung resection. MEASUREMENTS: 79 pre- and intraoperative variables, selected for inclusion based on a causal inference framework. The primary outcome of impaired oxygenation, an early marker of lung injury, was defined as at least one of the following within seven postoperative days: (1) SpO2 < 92%; (2) imputed PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg [(1) or (2) occurring at least twice within 24 h]; (3) intensive oxygen therapy (mechanical ventilation or > 50% oxygen or high-flow oxygen). MAIN RESULTS: Oxygenation was impaired within seven postoperative days in 70.8% of patients (26.6% with PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg or intensive oxygen therapy). In multivariable analysis, each additional cmH2O of intraoperative median driving pressure was associated with a 7% higher risk of impaired oxygenation (OR 1.07; 95%CI 1.04 to 1.10). Higher median intraoperative FiO2 (OR 1.23; 95%CI 1.14 to 1.31 per 0.1) and PEEP (OR 1.12; 95%CI 1.04 to 1.21 per 1 cm H2O) were also associated with increased risk. History of COPD (OR 2.55; 95%CI 1.95 to 3.35) and intraoperative albuterol administration (OR 2.07; 95%CI 1.17 to 3.67) also showed reliable effects. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired postoperative oxygenation is common after lung resection and is associated with potentially modifiable pre- and intraoperative respiratory factors.

Low-volume ventilation of preinjured lungs degrades lung function via stress concentration and progressive alveolar collapse.

Mechanical ventilation can cause ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI). The concept of stress concentrations suggests that surfactant dysfunction-induced microatelectases might impose injurious stresses on adjacent, open alveoli and function as germinal centers for injury propagation. The aim of the present study was to quantify the histopathological pattern of VILI progression and to test the hypothesis that injury progresses at the interface between microatelectases and ventilated lung parenchyma during low-positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ventilation. Bleomycin was used to induce lung injury with microatelectases in rats. Lungs were then mechanically ventilated for up to 6 h at PEEP = 1 cmH2O and compared with bleomycin-treated group ventilated protectively with PEEP = 5 cmH2O to minimize microatelectases. Lung mechanics were measured during ventilation. Afterward, lungs were fixed at end-inspiration or end-expiration for design-based stereology. Before VILI, bleomycin challenge reduced the number of open alveoli [N(alvair,par)] by 29%. No differences between end-inspiration and end-expiration were observed. Collapsed alveoli clustered in areas with a radius of up to 56 µm. After PEEP = 5 cmH2O ventilation for 6 h, N(alvair,par) remained stable while PEEP = 1 cmH2O ventilation led to an additional loss of aerated alveoli by 26%, mainly due to collapse, with a small fraction partly edema filled. Alveolar loss strongly correlated to worsening of tissue elastance, quasistatic compliance, and inspiratory capacity. The radius of areas of collapsed alveoli increased to 94 µm, suggesting growth of the microatelectases. These data provide evidence that alveoli become unstable in neighborhood of microatelectases, which most likely occurs due to stress concentration-induced local vascular leak and surfactant dysfunction.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Low-volume mechanical ventilation in the presence of high surface tension-induced microatelectases leads to the degradation of lung mechanical function via the progressive loss of alveoli. Microatelectases grow at the interfaces of collapsed and open alveoli. Here, stress concentrations might cause injury and alveolar instability. Accumulation of small amounts of alveolar edema can be found in a fraction of partly collapsed alveoli but, in this model, alveolar flooding is not a major driver for degradation of lung mechanics.

Comparison of limited driving pressure ventilation and low tidal volume strategies in adults with acute respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) presents a grave risk to acute respiratory failure patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation has been advocated as a protective strategy against VILI. However, the effectiveness of limited driving pressure (plateau pressure minus positive end-expiratory pressure) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the efficacy of LTV against limited driving pressure in preventing VILI in adults with respiratory failure. DESIGN: A single-centre, prospective, open-labelled, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This study was executed in medical intensive care units at Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. We enrolled acute respiratory failure patients undergoing intubation and mechanical ventilation. They were randomized in a 1:1 allocation to limited driving pressure (LDP; ⩽15 cmH2O) or LTV (⩽8 mL/kg of predicted body weight). The primary outcome was the acute lung injury (ALI) score 7 days post-enrolment. RESULTS: From July 2019 to December 2020, 126 patients participated, with 63 each in the LDP and LTV groups. The cohorts had the mean (standard deviation) ages of 60.5 (17.6) and 60.9 (17.9) years, respectively, and they exhibited comparable baseline characteristics. The primary reasons for intubation were acute hypoxic respiratory failure (LDP 49.2%, LTV 63.5%) and shock-related respiratory failure (LDP 39.7%, LTV 30.2%). No significant difference emerged in the primary outcome: the median (interquartile range) ALI scores for LDP and LTV were 1.75 (1.00-2.67) and 1.75 (1.25-2.25), respectively (p = 0.713). Twenty-eight-day mortality rates were comparable: LDP 34.9% (22/63), LTV 31.7% (20/63), relative risk (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.57, p = 0.705. Incidences of newly developed acute respiratory distress syndrome also aligned: LDP 14.3% (9/63), LTV 20.6% (13/63), RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.22, p = 0.348. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with acute respiratory failure, the efficacy of LDP and LTV in averting lung injury 7 days post-mechanical ventilation was indistinguishable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov database (identification number NCT04035915).

Limited breathing pressure or low amount of air given to the lung; which one is better for adults who need breathing help by ventilator machineWe conducted this research at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, aiming to compare two ways of helping patients with breathing problems. We studied 126 patients who were randomly put into two groups. One group received a method where the pressure during breathing was limited (limited driving pressure: LDP), and the other group got a method where the amount of air given to the lungs was kept low (low tidal volume: LTV). We checked how bad the lung injury was at seven days later. The results showed that there was no difference between the two methods. Both ways of helping patients breathe had similar outcomes, and neither was significantly better than the other in preventing lung problems. The study suggests that both approaches work about the same for patients who need help with breathing using a machine.

Comparative effects of variable versus conventional volume-controlled one-lung ventilation on gas exchange and respiratory system mechanics in thoracic surgery patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation with variable tidal volumes (V-VCV) has the potential to improve lung function during general anesthesia. We tested the hypothesis that V-VCV compared to conventional volume-controlled ventilation (C-VCV) would improve intraoperative arterial oxygenation and respiratory system mechanics in patients undergoing thoracic surgery under one-lung ventilation (OLV). METHODS: Patients were randomized to V-VCV (n = 39) or C-VCV (n = 39). During OLV tidal volume of 5 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) was used. Both groups were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O, inspiration to expiration ratio (I:E) of 1:1 (during OLV) and 1:2 during two-lung ventilation, the respiratory rate (RR) titrated to arterial pH, inspiratory peak-pressure ≤ 40 cm H2O and an inspiratory oxygen fraction of 1.0. RESULTS: Seventy-five out of 78 Patients completed the trial and were analyzed (dropouts were excluded). The partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) 20 min after the start of OLV did not differ among groups (V-VCV: 25.8 ± 14.6 kPa vs C-VCV: 27.2 ± 15.3 kPa; mean difference [95% CI]: 1.3 [-8.2, 5.5], P = 0.700). Furthermore, intraoperative gas exchange, intraoperative adverse events, need for rescue maneuvers due to desaturation and hypercapnia, incidence of postoperative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications, and hospital free days at day 30 after surgery did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In thoracic surgery patients under OLV, V-VCV did not improve oxygenation or respiratory system mechanics compared to C-VCV. Ethical Committee: EK 420092019. TRIAL REGISTRATION: at the German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00022202 (16.06.2020).

Adjustment of positive end-expiratory pressure to body mass index during mechanical ventilation in general anesthesia: BodyVent, a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients requiring general anesthesia, lung-protective ventilation can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications, which are associated with higher morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is one component of lung-protective ventilation. The correct strategy for setting adequate PEEP, however, remains controversial. PEEP settings that lead to a lower pressure difference between end-inspiratory plateau pressure and end-expiratory pressure ("driving pressure," ΔP) may reduce the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Preliminary data suggests that the PEEP required to prevent both end-inspiratory overdistension and end-expiratory alveolar collapse, thereby reducing ΔP, correlates positively with the body mass index (BMI) of patients, with PEEP values corresponding to approximately 1/3 of patient's respective BMI. Thus, we hypothesize that adjusting PEEP according to patient BMI reduces ΔP and may result in less postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 7 ml per kg predicted body weight will be randomized and assigned to either an intervention group with PEEP adjusted according to BMI or a control group with a standardized PEEP of 5 mbar. Pre- and postoperatively, lung ultrasound will be performed to determine the lung aeration score, and hemodynamic and respiratory vital signs will be recorded for subsequent evaluation. The primary outcome is the difference in ΔP as a surrogate parameter for lung-protective ventilation. Secondary outcomes include change in lung aeration score, intraoperative occurrence of hemodynamic and respiratory events, oxygen requirements and postoperative pulmonary complications. DISCUSSION: The study results will show whether an intraoperative ventilation strategy with PEEP adjustment based on BMI has the potential of reducing the risk for postoperative pulmonary complications as an easy-to-implement intervention that does not require lengthy ventilator maneuvers nor additional equipment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00031336. Registered 21st February 2023. TRIAL STATUS: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Germany, on 1st February 2023. Recruitment began in March 2023 and is expected to end in September 2023.

Effect of different positive end expiratory pressure levels on optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with or without midline shift who are undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

PURPOSE: In general, high levels of PEEP application is avoided in patients undergoing craniotomy to prevent a rise in ICP. But that approach would increase the risk of secondary brain injury especially in hypoxemic patients. Because the optic nerve sheath is distensible, a rise in ICP is associated with an increase in the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The cutoff value for elevated ICP assessed by ONSD is between 5.6 and 6.3 mm. We aimed to evaluate the effect of different PEEP levels on ONSD and compare the effect of different PEEP levels in patients with and without intracranial midline shift. METHODS: This prospective observational study was performed in aged 18-70 years, ASA I-III, 80 patients who were undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. After the induction of general anesthesia, the ONSD's were measured by the linear transducer from 3 mm below the globe at PEEP values of 0-5-10 cmH2O. The ONSD were compered between patients with (n = 7) and without midline shift (n = 73) at different PEEP values. RESULTS: The increases in ONSD due to increase in PEEP level were determined (p < 0.001). No difference was found in the comparison of ONSD between patients with and without midline shift in different PEEP values (p = 0.329, 0.535, 0.410 respectively). But application of 10 cmH2O PEEP in patients with a midline shift increased the mean ONSD value to 5.73 mm. This value is roughly 0.1 mm higher than the lower limit of the ONSD cutoff value. CONCLUSIONS: The ONSD in adults undergoing supratentorial tumor craniotomy, PEEP values up to 5 cmH2O, appears not to be associated with an ICP increase; however, the ONSD exceeded the cutoff for increased ICP when a PEEP of 10 cmH2O was applied in patients with midline shift.

Comparison of volume-controlled ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed in infants and young children in the prone position: A prospective randomized study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To explore if the pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) modes are superior to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) in optimizing intraoperative respiratory mechanics in infants and young children in the prone position. DESIGN: A single-center prospective randomized study. SETTING: Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients aged 1 month to 3 years undergoing elective spinal cord detethering surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to the VCV group, PCV group and PCV-VG group. The target tidal volume (VT) was 8 mL/kg and the respiratory rate (RR) was adjusted to maintain a constant end tidal CO2. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was intraoperative peak airway pressure (Ppeak). Secondary outcomes included other respiratory and ventilation variables, gas exchange values, serum lung injury biomarkers concentration, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative respiratory complications. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included in the final analysis (40 in each group). The VCV group showed higher Ppeak at T2 (10 min after prone positioning) and T3 (30 min after prone positioning) than the PCV and PCV-VG groups (T2: P = 0.015 and P = 0.002, respectively; T3: P = 0.007 and P = 0.009, respectively). The prone-related decrease in dynamic compliance was prevented by PCV and PCV-VG ventilation modalities at T2 and T3 than by VCV (T2: P = 0.008 and P = 0.015, respectively; T3: P = 0.015 and P = 0.014, respectively). Additionally, there were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes among the three groups. CONCLUSION: In infants and young children undergoing spinal cord detethering surgery in the prone position, PCV-VG may be a better ventilation mode due to its ability to mitigate the increase in Ppeak and decrease in Cdyn while maintaining consistent VT.

Intraoperative lung protection: strategies and their impact on outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The present review summarizes the current knowledge and the barriers encountered when implementing tailoring lung-protective ventilation strategies to individual patients based on advanced monitoring systems. RECENT FINDINGS: Lung-protective ventilation has become a pivotal component of perioperative care, aiming to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). High-quality research has established the benefits of strategies such as low tidal volume ventilation and low driving pressures. Debate is still ongoing on the most suitable levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the role of recruitment maneuvers. Adapting PEEP according to patient-specific factors offers potential benefits in maintaining ventilation distribution uniformity, especially in challenging scenarios like pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positions. Advanced monitoring systems, which continuously assess patient responses and enable the fine-tuning of ventilation parameters, offer real-time data analytics to predict and prevent impending lung complications. However, their impact on postoperative outcomes, particularly PPCs, is an ongoing area of research. SUMMARY: Refining protective lung ventilation is crucial to provide patients with the best possible care during surgery, reduce the incidence of PPCs, and improve their overall surgical journey.

The Effect of Positive Pressure Ventilation on Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is frequent in critically ill COVID-19 patients and is associated with a higher mortality risk. By increasing intrathoracic pressure, positive pressure ventilation (PPV) may reduce renal perfusion pressure by reducing venous return to the heart or by increasing renal venous congestion. This study's aim was to evaluate the association between AKI and haemodynamic and ventilatory parameters in COVID-19 patients with ARDS. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective observational study. Consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 who met ARDS criteria and required invasive mechanical ventilation were enrolled. The relationship between respiratory and haemodynamic parameters influenced by PPV and AKI development was evaluated. AKI was defined according to KDIGO criteria. AKI recovery was evaluated a month after ICU admission and patients were classified as "recovered," if serum creatinine (sCr) value returned to baseline, or as having "acute kidney disease" (AKD), if criteria for AKI stage 1 or greater persisted. The 6-month all-cause mortality was collected. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included in the analysis. AKI occurred in 69 (48%) patients and 26 (18%) required renal replacement therapy. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, sex, hypertension, cumulative dose of furosemide, fluid balance, and plateau pressure were independently associated with AKI. Mortality at 6 months was 50% in the AKI group and 32% in the non-AKI group (p = 0.03). Among 36 patients who developed AKI and were discharged alive from the hospital, 56% had a full renal recovery after a month, while 14%, 6%, and 14% were classified as having an AKD of stage 0, 2, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, AKI was independently associated with multiple variables, including high plateau pressure, suggesting a possible role of PPV on AKI development. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of mechanical ventilation on renal function.

Residual upper airway obstruction during nocturnal noninvasive ventilation despite high positive expiratory pressure. Impact of oronasal mask to nasal mask switch.

BACKGROUND: Nasal mask (NM) and oronasal masks (OM) can be used to provide noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Recent studies suggested that OM is the most used interface and that there is no difference in efficacy or in tolerance between OM and NM for chronic use. However, studies focusing on video laryngoscopy underlined the impact of OM in residual upper airway obstruction (UAO) under NIV. We sought to assess the real-life practice of switching from OM to NM when UAO events persist despite high EPAP levels. METHODS: In an open-label single center prospective cohort study, data from files and full night polysomnography on NM and OM were collected for patients wearing OM and presenting an UAO index ≥15/h despite an EPAP level ≥ 10 cmH20. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in the study. In 31 patients (74 %), switching to a NM reduced UAOi to ≥10/h. Interestingly, 92 % of these patients still had NM at 3 to 12 months of follow-up. Switching to a NM was also associated with a trend in paCO2 reduction and significant improvements in Epworth, sleep quality and NIV compliance. Successful interface switching was significantly associated with female gender, and a trend was observed in non-smokers. CONCLUSION: As for CPAP, switching to a NM improved NIV efficacy in a selected group of patients presenting residual UAO events despite high EPAP levels. Additionally, this switch has an impact on compliance and subjective sleepiness. Thus, in patients with persisting UAO on OM, switching to a NM could be a first-line intervention before considering further investigation such as polygraphy or video laryngoscopy. We also derive an algorithm for mask allocation and adaptation in acute and chronic NIV use.

Clinical characteristics of pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum in mechanical ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax (PTX) and pneumomediastinum (PM) have been reported as potential complications in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, their risk factors and etiology remain unknown. Herein, we investigated the clinical characteristics of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 with PTX or PM. METHODS: We examined patients with severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation who were admitted to the intensive care unit of a tertiary-level emergency medical center in Tokyo, Japan between April 1, 2020. and October 31, 2021. We collected and analyzed the clinical characteristics of the patients who presented with either PTX or PM during mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 165 patients required mechanical ventilation, and 15 patients with PTX/PM during mechanical ventilation were selected. Three patients with obvious causes were excluded, and the remaining 12 patients were analyzed (7.3%). The mortality rate in these patients was as high as 50%, demonstrating the difficulty of treatment in the presence of PTX/PM. PTX/PM occurred 14.5 days after intubation. A peak pressure of > 30 cmH2O was only apparent in one patient, suggesting that high positive pressure ventilation may be less involved than mentioned in the literature. In addition, the inspiratory effort was not strong in our group of patients. (P0.1 was 2.1 cm H2O [1.0-3.8]). CONCLUSION: Various factors are associated with the development of PTX/PM in patients on mechanical ventilation for COVID-19. We did not find a strong correlation between PTM/PM and barotrauma or strong inspiratory efforts, which have been identified as potential causes in previous studies.

Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure on intraoperative oxygenation in thoracic surgical patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypoxemia and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) often occur in patients with one-lung ventilation (OLV), due to both pulmonary shunt and atelectasis. It has been demonstrated that individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (iPEEP) can effectively improve intraoperative oxygenation, increase lung compliance, and reduce driving pressure, thereby decreasing the risk of developing PPCs. However, its effect during OLV is still unknown. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether iPEEP ventilation during OLV is superior to 5 cmH2O PEEP in terms of intraoperative oxygenation and the occurrence of PPCs. METHODS: This study is a prospective, randomized controlled, single-blind, single-center trial. A total of 112 patients undergoing thoracoscopic pneumonectomy surgery and OLV will be enrolled in the study. They will be randomized into two groups: the static lung compliance guided iPEEP titration group (Cst-iPEEP Group) and the constant 5 cmH2O PEEP group (PEEP 5 Group). The primary outcome will be the oxygenation index at 30 min after OLV and titration. Secondary outcomes are oxygenation index at other operative time points, PPCs, postoperative adverse events, ventilator parameters, vital signs, pH value, inflammatory factors, and economic indicators. DISCUSSION: This trial explores the effect of iPEEP on intraoperative oxygenation during OLV and PPCs. It provides some clinical references for optimizing the lung protective ventilation strategy of OLV, improving patient prognosis, and accelerating postoperative rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2300073411 . Registered on 10 July 2023.

Lung ultrasound-guided best positive end-expiratory pressure in neonatal anesthesia: a proposed randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Atelectasis is a common complication in neonatal anesthesia. Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used intraoperatively to evaluate and recognize atelectatic lung areas. Hypotheses for the study are: (1) The use of LUS to guide choice of best positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can lead to reduction of FiO2 to achieve same saturations of oxygen (SpO2). (2) In a less de-recruited lung, there will be less postoperative pulmonary complications. (3) Static respiratory system compliance could be different. (4) Hemodynamic parameters and amount of fluids infused or need for vasopressors intraoperatively could be different. METHODS: We propose a randomized controlled trial that compares standard PEEP settings with LUS-guided PEEP choice in patients under 2 months of age undergoing general anesthesia. RESULTS: The primary aim is to determine whether LUS-guided PEEP choice in neonatal anesthesia, compared to standard PEEP choice, can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to the ventilatory setting in order to maintain same SpO2s. Secondary aims are to determine whether patients treated with LUS-guided PEEP will develop less postoperative pulmonary complications, will have a significant difference in hemodynamic parameters and amount of fluids or vasopressors infused, and in static respiratory system compliance. CONCLUSIONS: We expect a significant reduction of FiO2 in LUS-guided ventilation. IMPACT: Lung atelectasis is extremely common in neonatal anesthesia, because of the physiology of the neonatal lung and chest wall and leads to hypoxemia, being a lung area with a perfusion/ventilation mismatch. Raising inspired fraction of oxygen can overcome temporarily hypoxemia but oxygen is a toxic compound for newborns. Lung ultrasound (LUS) can detect atelectasis at bedside and be used to optimize ventilator settings including choice of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims at demonstrating that LUS-guided choice of best PEEP during neonatal anesthesia can lead to reduction of inspired fractions of oxygen to keep same peripheral saturations SpO2.

High Tidal Volume, High Positive End Expiratory Pressure and Apneic Breath Hold Strategies (Lung Navigation Ventilation Protocol) With Cone Beam Computed Tomography Bronchoscopic Biopsy of Peripheral Lung Lesions: Results in 100 Patients.

BACKGROUND: A dedicated anesthesia protocol for bronchoscopic lung biopsy-lung navigation ventilation protocol (LNVP)-specifically designed to mitigate atelectasis and reduce unnecessary respiratory motion, has been recently described. LNVP demonstrated significantly reduced dependent ground glass, sublobar/lobar atelectasis, and atelectasis obscuring target lesions compared with conventional ventilation. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, we examine the impact of LNVP on 100 consecutive patients during peripheral lung lesion biopsy. We report the incidence of atelectasis using cone beam computed tomography imaging, observed ventilatory findings, anesthesia medications, and outcomes, including diagnostic yield, radiation exposure, and complications. RESULTS: Atelectasis was observed in a minority of subjects: ground glass opacity atelectasis was seen in 30 patients by reader 1 (28%) and in 18 patients by reader 2 (17%), with good agreement between readers (κ = 0.78). Sublobar/lobar atelectasis was observed in 23 patients by reader 1 and 26 patients by reader 2, also demonstrating good agreement (κ = 0.67). Atelectasis obscured target lesions in very few cases: 0 patients (0%, reader 1) and 3 patients (3%, reader 2). Diagnostic yield was 85.9% based on the AQuIRE definition. Pathology demonstrated 57 of 106 lesions (54%) were malignant, 34 lesions (32%) were benign, and 15 lesions (14%) were nondiagnostic. CONCLUSION: Cone beam computed tomography images confirmed low rates of atelectasis, high tool-in-lesion confirmation rate, and high diagnostic yield. LNVP has a similar safety profile to conventional bronchoscopy. Most patients will require intravenous fluid and vasopressor support. Further study of LNVP and other ventilation protocols are necessary to understand the impact of ventilation protocols on bronchoscopic peripheral lung biopsy.

Postoperative pulmonary complications with high versus standard FiO2 in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the possible clinical benefit of high intraoperative oxygen therapy on surgical site infection, the effect on postoperative respiratory function is debatable. However, it remains yet to be elucidated whether hyperoxia due to a high fraction of inspired oxygen used in conjunction with lung protective ventilation can lead to increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. METHODS: In this noninferiority randomized trial, an intraoperative high fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.8 (group H) was compared to a standard fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.3 to 0.4 (group S) in adult patients undergoing major elective or emergency surgery. A lung protective ventilation strategy was employed in all patients, including volume control ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, respiratory rate of 12 beats per minute, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 to 8 cm H2O. Postoperative pulmonary complications were assessed on postoperative days 3 and 5 by the Melbourne group scale. RESULTS: In this trial, n = 226 patients were randomized; among them, 130 patients underwent routine surgery, and 96 patients underwent emergency surgery. The median (interquartile range) of the patients was 48 (35-58) years, and 47.3% were female. Melbourne group scale scores at postoperative day 3 (median [interquartile range] 2 [1-4] in group S vs 2 [1-3] in group H; the difference in median [95% confidence interval] 0 [0, -1]; P = .13) and day 5 (median [interquartile range] 1 (0-3) in group S vs 1 [0-3] in group H; the difference in median [95% confidence interval] 0 [0, 0.5]; P = .34) were statistically similar in both the groups and the upper margin was within the predefined margin of 1. Incidence of surgical site infection (P = .46), postoperative hospital stay (P = .29), and days alive without antibiotic therapy at postoperative day 28 (P = .95) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: High intraoperative fiO2 was noninferior to standard fiO2 in postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing major surgery.