Simulation training in transurethral resection/laser vaporization of the prostate; evidence from a systematic review by the European Section of Uro-Technology.

PURPOSE: Transurethral resection (TURP) and photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) constitute established surgical options to treat benign prostate hyperplasia. We investigated the current literature for simulators that could be used as a tool for teaching urologists alone or within the boundaries of a course or a curriculum. METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL. Search terms included: Simulat*, train*, curricull*, transurethral, TUR*, vaporesect*, laser. The efficacy of different simulators and the impact of different devices, curricula and courses in training and trainee learning curves were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies are selected and presented. Validated virtual reality TURP simulators are the UW VR, PelvicVision, Uro-Trainer, and TURPsim™. Validated synthetic TURP models are Dr. K. Forke's TURP trainer, Bristol TURP trainer, different tissue prostate models, and 3D-printed phantoms. The Myo Sim PVP and the GreenLightTM are sufficiently validated PVP simulators. Several TURP and PVP training curricula have been developed and judged as applicable. Finally, the TURP modules of the European Urology Residents Education Programme (EUREP) Hands-on Training course and the Urology Simulation Bootcamp Course (USBC) are the most basic annual TURP courses identified in the international literature. CONCLUSIONS: Simulators and courses or curricula are valuable learning and training TURP/PVP tools. The existent models seem efficient, are not always adequately evaluated and accepted. As part of training curricula and training courses, the use of training simulators can significantly improve quality for young urologists' education and clinical practice.

Track and Teach: Identifying Key Movement Patterns in Endoscopic Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate.

PURPOSE: We evaluated a system for noninvasive quantitative motion tracking to recognize differences in the movement pattern of experienced surgeons and beginners. Since performing endoscopic procedures requires extensive training, and tissue damage due to disruptive movements with sudden acceleration is possible, the learning curve for beginners is of clinical relevance. Steepening this curve may improve patient outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a commercial gyroscope sensor with a wireless data link, which was attached to the resectoscope handle (RH). After recording, orientation was retrieved by application of the calculated rotation matrices to the RH vector relative to the sensor under the boundary condition of rotational movement around and quasi-constant distance to the pivot point at pelvic floor level. Data alignment, normalization, interpolation, and analysis were performed in custom software scripts. RESULTS: Experienced surgeons and beginners were recorded in n = 36 and n = 14 holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), respectively. Prostate size, patient age, and recorded procedure duration were comparable. Mean lever angle of the individual normalized motion patterns was considerably lower (19.28 ± 0.54° [SEM]) in the advanced than in the beginners' group (24.52 ± 1.00°; p = 0.0001). Further parameters such as velocity and motion variation demonstrated additional differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of motion tracking in HoLEP. Pronounced differences exist between different stages of surgeon experience with this procedure. The method can easily be adopted to aide young surgeons in resectoscope handling and identification of improvable motion patterns. Damage to the pelvic floor and surrounding tissue may thus be reduced.

Feasibility of a telementoring approach as a practical training for transurethral enucleation of the benign prostatic hyperplasia using bipolar energy: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Telementoring is one of the applications of telemedicine capable of bringing highly experienced surgeons to areas lacking expertise. In the current study, we aimed to assess a novel telementoring application during the learning curve of transurethral enucleation of the prostate using bipolar energy (TUEB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A telementoring system was developed by our engineering department. This application was used to mentor ten prospective cases of TUEB performed by an expert endourologist (novice to the TUEB). A questionnaire was filled by the operating surgeon and the mentor to provide subjective evaluation of the telementoring system. Finally, the outcomes of these patients were compared to a control group consisting of ten consecutive patients performed by the mentor. RESULTS: Ten consecutive TUEB were performed using this telementoring application. Delayed and interrupted connection were experienced in two and one patients, respectively; however, their effect was minor, and they did not compromise the safety of the procedure. None of the patients required conversion to conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Only one patient in our series experienced grade IIIb complication. CONCLUSION: The telementoring application for TUEB is promising. It is a simple and low-cost tool that could be a feasible option to ensure patients' safety during the initial phase of the learning curve without time and locations constraints for both the mentor and the trainee; However, it should be mentioned that telementoring cannot yet replace the traditional surgical training with the mentor and trainee being in the operative room. Further studies are required to confirm the current results.

Design, implementation, and evaluation of a novel curriculum to teach transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a 3-year experience of urology simulation bootcamp course.

OBJECTIVES: To present the three-year experience of the multi-component TURP module at Urology Simulation Bootcamp Course (USBC) and demonstrate trainee's competence progression and satisfaction. METHODS: During the USBC, a 4-h TURP module was developed and consisted of (a) familiarisation and assembly of resectoscope instrument, (b) didactic lecture on TURP operative techniques and postoperative complications, (c) learning hands-on resection on validated simulators [Samed, GmBH, Dresden, Germany; TURP Mentor™, Simbionix, Israel], and (d) practicing clot evacuation using the Ellik bladder Evacuator. Trainee's level of instrument knowledge, operative competence, and confidence were assessed pre- and post-course. Trainee's feedback was also collected. RESULTS: One hundred thirty trainees participated in the USBC between 2016 and 2018. Eighty-seven percent of trainees scored themselves as 1-3 (low confidence in resection) on a 5-point Likert scale. Trainees significantly improved in their ability to perform resectoscope assembly for resection, coagulation and incision by 33.6% (p < 0.001), 28.1% (p < 0.001) and 34.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. There was a significant improvement in scores in itemised technical skill on the TURP simulator following completion of the TURP module (Mean difference = 3.4 points, 95% CI 2-4, p < 0.001). Ninety-one percent of trainees agreed that the TURP module was useful for their development in urological training. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that it is feasible to develop and implement a focussed module for teaching TURP with significant improvement in learning. Trainee feedback suggests that they were highly satisfied with the teaching provided and models used. This style of training can be implemented for other common surgical procedures.

TUR-P phantom for resident surgical training: food-based design as a human mimicking model of the prostate.

PURPOSE: This study would like to develop a novel model similar to human prostate in terms of its texture profile, sensation upon resection, and anatomical hallmarks for resident transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) training. METHODS: Ten phantom designs were proposed, using broadly available ingredients and a homemade protocol. Three steps of evaluation and development were done: objective measurement measuring texture profile (e.g. hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness/consistency, and adhesiveness/stickiness) using TA-XT2i Texture Analyzer (Llyod Instruments, Ametek Inc) to compare the designs with human prostate, finding the most similar design to prostate; expert consensus by a panel of urologist/senior residents comparing the simulation of TUR-P on the selected design with pre-existing control phantom; and anatomical design development using 3D printing for molding. RESULTS: Texture profile analysis for mean hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness/consistency, and adhesiveness/stickiness of human prostate was 3753.4 ± 673.4, 85 ± 1.9, 0.7 ± 0.03, and 0, respectively, and design IX was the most similar to human prostate (3660.7 ± 465.6, 87.0 ± 2.5, 0.6 ± 0.05, 0). Furthermore, expert consensus showed superiority of design IX compared with pre-existing control phantom (16.95 ± 1.36 vs 8.86 ± 3.10; P < 0.001). Most of the respondents agreed that the texture, consistency, and phantom ability to mimic human prostate upon resection were similar with human prostate, though hallmarks of the prostate e.g. veromontanum, and lobes were lacking. We used these feedbacks to develop a mold, designed to produce these important anatomical hallmarks. CONCLUSION: This study developed a cost-effective prostate model from a food-based design that is similar to human prostate in terms of its texture and sensation upon TUR-P resection provided with important anatomical hallmarks.

Benefits and Limitations of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Training With a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator.

PURPOSE: Profound endourological skills are required for optimal postoperative outcome parameters after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). We investigated the Karl Storz (Tuttlingen, Germany) UroTrainer for virtual simulation training of the TURP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty urologists underwent a virtual reality (VR) TURP training. After a needs analysis, performance scores and self-rated surgical skills were compared before and after the curriculum, the realism of the simulator was assessed, and the optimal level of experience for VR training was evaluated. Statistical testing was done with SPSS 25. RESULTS: Forty percent of participants indicated frequent intraoperative overload during real-life TURP and 80% indicated that VR training might be beneficial for endourological skills development, underlining the need to advance classical endourological training. For the complete cohort, overall VR performance scores (P = 0.022) and completeness of resection (P < 0.001) significantly improved. Self-rated parameters including identification of anatomical structures (P = 0.046), sparing the sphincter (P = 0.002), and handling of the resectoscope (P = 0.033) became significantly better during the VR curriculum. Participants indicated progress regarding handling of the resectoscope (70%), bleeding control (55%), and finding the correct resection depth (50%). Although overall realism and handling of the resectoscope was good, virtual bleeding control and correct tissue feedback should be improved in future VR simulators. Seventy percent of participants indicated 10 to 50 virtual TURP cases to be optimal and 80% junior residents to be the key target group for VR TURP training. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to improve training the TURP and VR simulators might be a valuable supplement, especially for urologists beginning with the endourological desobstruction of the prostate.

The European Urology Residents Education Programme Hands-on Training Format: 4 Years of Hands-on Training Improvements from the European School of Urology.

BACKGROUND: The European School of Urology (ESU) started the European Urology Residents Education Programme (EUREP) in 2003 for final year urology residents, with hands-on training (HOT) added later in 2007. OBJECTIVE: To assess the geographical reach of EUREP, trainee demographics, and individual quality feedback in relation to annual methodology improvements in HOT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From September 2014 to October 2017 (four EUREP courses) several new features have been applied to the HOT format of the EUREP course: 1:1 training sessions (2015), fixed 60-min time slots (2016), and standardised teaching methodology (2017). The resulting EUREP HOT format was verified by collecting and prospectively analysing the following data: total number of participants attending different HOT courses; participants' age; country of origin; and feedback obtained annually. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 796 participants from 54 countries participated in 1450 HOT sessions over the last 4 yr. This included 294 (20%) ureteroscopy (URS) sessions, 237 (16.5%) transurethral resection (TUR) sessions, 840 (58%) basic laparoscopic sessions, and 79 (5.5%) intermediate laparoscopic sessions. While 712 residents (89%) were from Europe, 84 (11%) were from non-European nations. Of the European residents, most came from Italy (16%), Germany (15%), Spain (15%), and Romania (8%). Feedback for the basic laparoscopic session showed a constant improvement in scores over the last 4 yr, with the highest scores achieved last year. This included feedback on improvements in tutor rating (p=0.017), organisation (p<0.001), and personal experience with EUREP (p<0.001). Limitations lie in the difficulties associated with the use of an advanced training curriculum with wet laboratory or cadaveric courses in this format, although these could be performed in other training centres in conjunction with EUREP. CONCLUSIONS: The EUREP trainee demographics show that the purpose of the course is being achieved, with excellent feedback reported. While European trainees dominate the demographics, participation from a number of non-European countries suggests continued ESU collaboration with other national societies and wider dissemination of simulation training worldwide. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this paper we look at methodological improvements and feedback for the European Urology Residents Education Programme hands-on-training over the last 4 yr.

A Randomized Trial Comparing The Learning Curve of 3 Endoscopic Enucleation Techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP, and MEP) for BPH Using Mentoring Approach-Initial Results.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the differences in the learning curve associated with different techniques of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups (30 patients in each): HoLEP, ThuFLEP or MEP. Inclusion criteria for the study included prostate volume <80 cc, IPSS > 20, or Qmax < 10. The EEPs were performed by 3 surgeons experienced in transurethral resection of the prostate. Assignment of surgeons to surgical technique was also randomized. None of the surgeons had prior experience in EEP. RESULTS: ThuFLEP was slightly superior (with no significant difference [P > .05]) to HoLEP and MEP in terms of overall enucleation rate-1.0 g/min vs 0.8 g/min and 0.7 g/min, respectively. We observed similar enucleation rates at the initial stages of training (first 20 surgeries) with insignificant increase in ThuFLEP efficiency. At next 10 surgeries ThuFLEP and HoLEP efficiency were higher than of MEP (P < .001) without significant difference between techniques of laser EEP (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate can be adopted safely and effectively within 30 surgeries if the technique is learned with a mentoring approach. EEP is shown to be safe and effective even in the initial stages of learning. Laser EEP (HoLEP, ThuFLEP) appears to lend itself to quicker adaptation compared MEP.

Morcellation Efficiency in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Oscillating Morcellator Outperforms Reciprocating Morcellator With no Apparent Learning Curve.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the morcellation efficiency of the Wolf Piranha oscillating morcellator with the Lumenis VersaCut reciprocating morcellator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. The first 41 cases of HoLEP with morcellation performed with the oscillating morcellator were matched by weight of resected tissue to 41 control patients from our historic data set who underwent morcellation with the reciprocating system. The primary outcome of interest was morcellation efficiency. We also evaluated surgeon experience level to assess for a learning curve with the oscillating morcellator. RESULTS: The 41 patients from each group were comparable in terms of age, prostate size, continuation of aspirin, and catheter status. The oscillating morcellation efficiency was nearly double that of the reciprocating morcellator (8.6 g/min [range: 3.0-18.3] vs 3.8 g/min [range: 0.9-10.1], P <.0001). Mean resected weights for cases with the oscillating and reciprocating instruments were 69 g (range: 17-224 g) and 69 g (range: 17-213 g), respectively (P = .9). The total operative time and complication rates did not significantly differ. For the oscillating system, morcellation efficiency for cases performed by staff alone was 9.8 g/min compared with 8.1 g/min when trainees were involved (P = .2), and there was no correlation between morcellation efficiency and number of cases performed (R = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The oscillating morcellation system resulted in a morcellation efficiency double that of the reciprocating system for tissue retrieval after HoLEP. Achieving efficiency with the oscillating system was not associated with a significant learning curve and was not impacted by trainee involvement.

[Prospective evaluation of the direct costs of prostate enucleation by the HoLEP® laser during the learning curve period]. / Évaluation prospective des coûts directs de l'énucléation prostatique par le laser HoLEP® pendant la courbe d'apprentissage.

OBJECTIVE: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been shown to be effective in treating large prostates compared to prostate transurethral resection (TURP). There are no published data evaluating specifically the impact of the learning curve on the direct costs of HoLEP. The objective of this study was to evaluate the direct costs generated by the use of HoLEP laser during the learning curve period. METHOD: The costs of all medical devices (DM) and drugs used, pre- and post-operative parameters during surgery have been prospectively collected between March and October 2016. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 70.8 years and a mean prostate volume of 68.6 cm3. The mean cost of anesthesia was 39.0 € and that of drugs and DM used for surgery was 257.95 € but could reach 470.76 € in case of conversion to bipolar resection. The mean duration of enucleation and morcellation was 150minutes with a mean weight of enucleated specimens of 40.4g. The total mean duration of patient care was 197minutes at an estimated hourly cost of € 636. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some limitations, this study makes it possible to analyze the direct costs of the management of benign prostatic hypertrophy using HoLEP, an innovative surgical technique, and to specify that these costs are more related to bipolar conversion and voluminous adenomas especially during the learning curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Evaluation of the learning curve for transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of prostate using a mentor-based approach

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the mentor-based learning curve of one single surgeon with transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of prostate (PKERP) prospectively. Materials and Methods Ninety consecutive PKERP operations performed by one resident under the supervision of an experienced endourologist were studied. Operations were analyzed in cohorts of 10 cases to determine when a plateau was reached for the variables such as operation efficiency, enucleation efficiency and frequency of mentor advice (FMA). Patient demographic variables, perioperative data, complications and 12-month follow-up data were analyzed and compared with the results of a senior urologist. Results The mean operative efficiency and enucleation efficiency increased from a mean of 0.49±0.09g/min and 1.11±0.28g/min for the first 10 procedures to a mean of 0.63±0.08g/min and 1.62±0.36g/min for case numbers 31-40 (p=0.003 and p=0.002). The mean value of FMA decreased from a mean of 6.7±1.5 for the first 10 procedures to a mean of 2.8±1.2 for case numbers 31-40 (p<0.01). The senior urologist had a mean operative efficiency and enucleation efficiency equivalent to those of the senior resident after 40 cases. There was significant improvement in 3, 6 and 12 month’s parameter compared with preoperative values (p<0.001). Conclusions PKERP can be performed safely and efficiently even during the initial learning curve of the surgeon when closely mentored. Further well-designed trials with several surgeons are needed to confirm the results.

Development and Validation of a Novel and Cost-Effective Animal Tissue Model for Training Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a new and cost-effective animal tissue training model for practicing resection skills of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A porcine kidney was prepared and restructured to simulate the relevant anatomy of the human prostate. The restructured prostate was connected to an artificial urethra and bladder. Face, content, and construct validity of the model was carried out using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, and comparison in task performance between participants and experts was made using observational clinical human reliability analysis. RESULTS: A total of 24 participants and 11 experts who practiced TURP skills on this model from October 2014 to December 2015 were recruited. The mean score on specific feature of the anatomy and color, sensation of texture and feeling of resection, conductibility of current, and efficacy and safety of the model were 4.34 ± 0.37, 4.51 ± 0.63, 4.13 ± 0.53, and 4.35 ± 0.71, respectively, by participants whereas they were 4.22 ± 0.23, 4.30 ± 0.48, 4.11 ± 0.62, and 4.56 ± 0.77, respectively, by the experts on a scale of 1 (unrealistic) to 5 (very realistic). Participants committed more technical errors than the experts (11 vs 7, p < 0.001), produced more movements of the instruments (51 vs 33, p < 0.001), and required longer operating time (11.4 vs 6.2min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A newly developed restructured animal tissue model for training TURP was reported. Validation study on the model demonstrates that this is a very realistic and effective model for skills training of TURP. Trainees committed more technical errors, more unproductive movements, and required longer operating time.

Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation and Resection of Prostate Using a Mentor-based Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the mentor-based learning curve of one single surgeon with transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of prostate (PKERP) prospectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety consecutive PKERP operations performed by one resident under the supervision of an experienced endourologist were studied. Operations were analyzed in cohorts of 10 cases to determine when a plateau was reached for the variables such as operation efficiency, enucleation efficiency and frequency of mentor advice (FMA). Patient demographic variables, perioperative data, complications and 12-month follow-up data were analyzed and compared with the results of a senior urologist. RESULTS: The mean operative efficiency and enucleation efficiency increased from a mean of 0.49±0.09g/min and 1.11±0.28g/min for the first 10 procedures to a mean of 0.63±0.08g/min and 1.62±0.36g/min for case numbers 31-40 (p=0.003 and p=0.002). The mean value of FMA decreased from a mean of 6.7±1.5 for the first 10 procedures to a mean of 2.8±1.2 for case numbers 31-40 (p<0.01). The senior urologist had a mean operative efficiency and enucleation efficiency equivalent to those of the senior resident after 40 cases. There was significant improvement in 3, 6 and 12 month's parameter compared with preoperative values (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PKERP can be performed safely and efficiently even during the initial learning curve of the surgeon when closely mentored. Further well-designed trials with several surgeons are needed to confirm the results.

Learning transurethral resection of the prostate: A comparison of the weight of resected specimen to the weight of enucleated specimen in open prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive procedures in the surgical management of benign prostate enlargement (BPE) are of limited use in the resource-poor settings due to nonavailability of the requisite facilities and skills. It has been observed that teaching uroendoscopy inclusive of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) can be challenging in the resource-poor settings where the traditional master-apprentice (Halstedian) approach has remained the prevalent training technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We aimed in this retrospective study to assess completeness of resection in TURP by comparing the proportion of prostate tissue resected to the proportion enucleated in open retropubic prostatectomy (ORP). We included all BPE patients on urethral catheter managed in the first 18 months after Halstedian training in TURP. The analysis was done using SPSS® 20 and VassarStats® online software. RESULTS: Twenty patients' files for TURP and twenty-eight patients' files for ORP met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the 2 treatment arms were similar in age (P = 0.22), body mass index (P = 0.45), proportion of prostate tissue extirpated (P = 0.38), and International Prostate Symptom Score 12-month postprocedure (P = 0.06). However, larger prostates were treated with ORP (P < 0.0005). The correlation of the weight of resected specimen to preoperative prostate volume (PV) (r = 0.78; P < 0.001) was similar to that of enucleated specimen to preoperative PV (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). Similarly, the proportion of extirpated specimen correlated positively with the preoperative PVs for both TURP (r = 0.23; P = 0.33) and ORP (r = 0.292; P = 0.13), with no evidence of any difference between the 2 correlation values (P = 0.84). CONCLUSION: With appropriate patient selection, especially as a newly trained Surgeon, resections in TURP are as complete as enucleations in ORP.

Technical aspects of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation and resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

TUERP, which is based on TURP, technically has been proven to be safe and effective with reduced complication rates. Due to the lack of systematic pre-clinical training, the surgery is learnt only inside the operative theatre in the majority of the Chinese medical centers. It is also known to have a steep learning curve, and very few articles have addressed the technical aspects of TUERP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The videos of 91 cases of bipolar transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate, which were performed by one urological surgeon in our department from August 2013 to January 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. With an extensive review of the literature and based on the summary of our experience, detailed techniques and tips for TUERP are described. RESULTS: The procedure is initiated from the enucleation of mid-lobe and progressed in a retrograde mode with the guide of the capsular plane. Along with the experience accumulated, the capability of landmark identifying and the surgical skills were improved. CONCLUSION: A steep operative learning curve may be the main obstacle to the widespread use of TUERP. Accurate identification and orientation of the landmark with good understanding of the three-dimensional structure of the prostatic fossa and the detailed technical issues of enucleating along the right capsule plane will be helpful for beginners to overcome the learning curve and gain confidence with this procedure and for experienced surgeons to further improve their surgical technique.

Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

OBJECTIVES: To describe the step-by-step learning curve of the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) surgical technique. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicentre observational study was conducted, involving surgeons experienced in transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy but never having performed HoLEP. The main judgment criterion was the ability of the surgeon to perform four consecutive successful procedures, defined by the following: complete enucleation and morcellation within <90 min, without any conversion to standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), with acceptable stress, and with acceptable difficulty (evaluated by Likert scales). Each surgeon included 20 consecutive cases. RESULTS: Of nine centres, three abandoned HoLEP before the end of the study due to complications, and one was excluded for treating patients off protocol. Only one centre achieved the main judgment criterion of four consecutive successful HoLEP procedures. Overall, the procedures were successfully performed in 43.6% of cases. Reasons for unsuccessful procedures were mainly operative time >90 min (n = 51), followed by conversion to TURP (n = 14), incomplete morcellation (n = 8), significant stress (n = 9), or difficulty (n = 14) during HoLEP. Ignoring operating time, 64% of procedures were successful and four out of five centres did four consecutive successful cases. Of the five centres that completed the study, four chose to continue HoLEP. CONCLUSION: Even in a prospective training structure, HoLEP has a steep learning curve exceeding 20 cases, with almost half of our centres choosing to abandon or not to continue with the technique. Operating time and difficulty of the enucleation seem the most important problems for a beginner. A more intensely mentored and structured mentorship programme might allow safer adoption of the procedure.

Evaluation of the Learning Curve for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Using Multiple Outcome Measures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and quantify the surgical learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) of a single surgeon. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 253 consecutive cases performed by the same surgeon from 2006 to 2013 was conducted. Primary outcomes included enucleation ratio and morcellation efficiencies and complication rates. Three-month postoperative prostate-specific antigen values were used as secondary measures. Cases were divided into cohorts of 20 cases to assess changes in means analyzed through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tests. Scatter plots of cases with a best-fit line were drawn to analyze the learning curve. RESULTS: The mean age of patients across the cases was 69.21 years with an average transrectal ultrasound prostate volume of 95.84 cc. Enucleation ratio efficiency was significantly different between cohorts (P = .02) plateau after 50-60 cases conducted. Similarly, a significant difference is shown for morcellation efficiency (P = .01) with stabilization in performance after 60 cases. Complication rates decreased through the caseload but did not show a statistical difference (P = .62) or plateauing on the graph. Finally, no difference between 3-month postoperative prostate-specific antigen values was seen (P = .083); however, a learning curve of 50 cases was observed graphically. CONCLUSION: Within our single-surgeon cohort, we experienced a learning curve of 40-60 cases for the HoLEP procedure. Large variability in performance late into the caseload demonstrates the technical difficulty of HoLEP. Owing to this, adjuncts to training such as simulation-based training may be of use for the new surgeon to shorten the initial phase of learning.

Role of transurethral resection of the prostate simulators for training in transurethral surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Transurethral surgery is an art unique to urologists; mastering the craft is essential for day-to-day practice. Medical treatment along with minimally invasive treatments have significantly reduced the number of transurethral resection of prostates. Decrease in resident's training hours, expanding subspecialties and the emergence of newer technologies have burdened the trainees who are trying to digest the ever-expanding medical literature. Moreover, expectations from patients and insurance companies with a stress on cutting costs and raising litigations have brought changes in apprentice-based to simulator-based training. We studied the role of transurethral resection of prostate simulators in training of transurethral surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: TURP simulators from bench to virtual reality computer models are available. Most of them have undergone face, content and construct validity. Nontechnical skills training is also important hence simulation to simulator training. Simulation programmes incorporating communication, team building, minimizing errors caused by distraction and managing complex situations can turn a novice into an expert with adequate practice in a stress-free environment. Work is also done to define learning curve, and factors affecting the path to reach the desired goal. Concepts are emerging to integrate simulators and simulation into the existing training programmes. SUMMARY: TURP simulators are essential for training in transurethral surgery. Low or high-fidelity simulators do not matter, but having a well structured simulation programme, under the scrutiny of a dedicated trained faculty, will address most of the issues related to training in transurethral surgery, an art essential for urologists irrespective of the subspecialty one pursues in the future.