RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Beta-blocker use evaluation is a performance method that focuses on the evaluation of beta-blocker use processes to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Several studies conducted in different hospitals revealed a high incidence of inappropriate prescription of beta-blockers among hospitalized patients. Therefore, it is important to identify inappropriate beta-blocker prescribing since they may increase the risk of hospitalizations. Despite this, there was no study conducted related to drug use evaluation of beta-blockers in Nedjo general hospital (NGH). Thus, this study was aimed at assessing the use evaluation of beta-blockers in medical wards of NGH. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at medical wards of NGH from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017. RESULTS: Out of the total of 149 medical record of patients that contains beta-blockers, 84 (56.37%) were males and about one-third (31.54%) of the patients ages were between 41 and 50 years. Propranolol was the most commonly prescribed beta-blocker (62.76%), and 94.56% of beta-blockers were prescribed with correct indication. There were about 51%, 46.31%, 64.43%, and 46.98% of beta-blockers prescribed with the correct dose, duration, frequency, and route of administration, respectively. Regarding the routes of administration, 70 (46.98%) of them were prescribed with the correct route. Most drugs interacting were propranolol with cimetidine 26 (68.42%), and the most frequent condition for which beta-blockers were prescribed was hypertension (32.89%). CONCLUSION: Overall, there was an inappropriate use of beta-blockers in terms of dosage and durations. So, prescribers of NGH should strictly adhere to the national treatment guideline when prescribing medications. Additionally, drug information centers have proved useful and effective in promoting rational drug use. Hence, it should be recommended for general use.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Hospitais Gerais/tendências , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Adolescente , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Interações Medicamentosas , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Etiópia , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compile and synthesize the available literature describing medical cannabis use across various disease states. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EBSCO, and Google Scholar searches were conducted using MeSH and/or keywords. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were included if they described the use of cannabis-based products and medications in the treatment of a predefined list of disease states in humans and were published in English. The extraction period had no historical limit and spanned through April 2019. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence was compiled and summarized for the following medical conditions: Alzheimer disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, autism, cancer and cancer-associated adverse effects, seizure disorders, human immunodeficiency virus, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis (MS), nausea, pain, posttraumatic stress disorder, and hospice care. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Based on identified data, the most robust evidence suggests that medical cannabis may be effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, seizure disorders, MS-related spasticity, and pain (excluding diabetic neuropathy). Overall, the evidence is inconsistent and generally limited by poor quality. The large variation in cannabis-based products evaluated in studies limits the ability to make direct comparisons. Regardless of the product, a gradual dose titration was utilized in most studies. Cannabis-based therapies were typically well tolerated, with the most common adverse effects being dizziness, somnolence, dry mouth, nausea, and euphoria. CONCLUSIONS: As more states authorize medical cannabis use, there is an increasing need for high-quality clinical evidence describing its efficacy and safety. This review is intended to serve as a reference for clinicians, so that the risks and realistic benefits of medical cannabis are better understood.
Assuntos
Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Maconha Medicinal/administração & dosagem , Maconha Medicinal/efeitos adversos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Náusea/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Vômito/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Temporal changes in the dispensing of glucose-lowering drugs (GLD) and their associated costs among elderly populations is unclear. This information is especially relevant to countries in which medications are partly or fully government subsidized. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the trends in prevalence, incidence and costs associated with GLD dispensed to older Australians. METHODS: We analysed Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data for 76,906 people aged ≥ 65 years dispensed diabetes medications over the period 2013-2016. RESULTS: Older males were dispensed more GLD than were older females, with the marginal difference increasing from 3.2% in 2013 (age-sex adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.032; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.024-1.041; p < 0.001) to 3.9% in 2016 (aIRR 1.039; 95% CI 1.030-1.047; p < 0.001). The number of GLD dispensed per person was consistently lower in those aged ≥ 75 years than in those aged 65-74 years, with the gap widening over the years. More patients were initiated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors over the study period, at the expense of older GLD. The proportion of users and attributed costs associated with the use of metformin, sulfonylureas, α-glucosidase inhibitors and thiazolidinediones decreased over time. The total subsidized costs of GLD is forecast to increase to $A395 million by 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment landscape for diabetes in Australia is undergoing dynamic change. More patients were initiated with the newer but costlier GLD over the study period.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Custos de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/tendências , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Glicemia/análise , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/economia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective in reducing thromboembolism events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, little is known about trends in NVAF prevalence and DOAC prescriptions in daily clinical practice. This study investigated the current status and trends in NVAF prevalence and DOAC prescriptions in a region of Japan.MethodsâandâResults:Annual data for the 4 years from May 2014 to May 2017 in the Tsugaru region of Aomori Prefecture, Japan, were obtained for analysis from the Japanese National Health Insurance database ("Kokuho" database [KDB]). The prevalence of NVAF in subjects aged 40-74 years increased gradually over the 4-year study period (1,094/57,452 [1.90%] in 2014, 1,055/56,018 [1.88%] in 2015, 1,072/54,256 [1.98%] in 2016, and 1,154/52,341 [2.20%] in 2017). The proportion of NVAF patients prescribed warfarin decreased (42%, 33%, 24%, and 21% in 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively), the proportion of those prescribed DOACs increased (30%, 42%, 50%, and 57%, respectively), and the proportion not prescribed an oral anticoagulant (OAC) decreased (28%, 25%, 26%, and 22%, respectively). However, 17% of patients with a CHADS2score ≥2 were not prescribed an OAC in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: By using the KDB we found that the prevalence of NVAF has increased gradually from 2014 to 2017. In the Tsugaru region in Japan, DOACs prescriptions increased and warfarin prescriptions decreased over the 4-year period.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/administração & dosagem , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Varfarina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medicines Use Reviews (MURs) and the New Medicine Service (NMS) are services delivered by UK community pharmacists to improve adherence, improve patient understanding of their medicines and reduce medicines wastage. AIM: In this scoping review we aim to identify, map and critically examine the nature of existing empirical evidence in peer reviewed journals relating to MUR and NMS consultations. METHOD: Systematic searches identified the available MUR and NMS empirical literature. We sought data on barriers and facilitators to conducting MUR or NMS consultations, the perceptions of pharmacists and patients, the conduct of consultations, and outcomes of consultations. Searches from 2005 (when MURs were introduced) to May 2018 were conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and Scopus databases. Data were extracted into Excel for examination of study characteristics, participant characteristics, type of intervention/services delivered and key study quantitative and/or qualitative findings. RESULTS: Forty-one papers from 37 studies met the inclusion criteria: 28 papers were of MURs, 10 of NMS and 3 for both services. Studies focused on the introduction and implementation of these services, with little attention to outcomes for patients; effectiveness was not evaluated beyond in a single NMS RCT. Observational data indicated that pharmacists and patients view MURs and the NMS positively, despite challenges implementing these services and apparent lack of communication between pharmacists and GPs. Consultations were reported to be short, typically 10-12â¯min, characterised by limited engagement with patients and their health problems. The extent and nature of advice on health behaviours during consultations or other content was rarely examined. CONCLUSION: The research literature on MURs and the NMS has developed slowly. There is much scope for further research attention to developing more patient-centred care.
Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/normas , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Farmacêuticos/normas , Papel Profissional , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/tendências , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/tendências , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background Older age and inappropriate prescribing is related to a greater rate of emergency department visits and hospitalisations. Objective To assess the efficacy of an interprofessional collaboration programme in which a review of the medication of older patients seen in the emergency observation unit was carried out. Setting Emergency departments at four Spanish hospitals. Method Randomised, controlled study. Patients over 65 years of age presenting to the emergency department were randomised to a control or an intervention group. In the intervention group, a pharmacist reviewed the patients' chronic medication and identified any potentially inappropriate prescriptions based on the STOPP/START criteria. Each case was discussed with the emergency specialist and a recommendation to modify the treatment was sent to the general practitioner. Main outcome measure Rate of emergency visits and hospital admissions. Results The adjusted rate ratio of emergency visits and hospital admissions was 0.808 (95% CI 0.617 to 1.059) at 3 months, 0.888 (95% CI 0.696 to 1.134) at 6 months and 0.954 (95% CI 0.772 to 1.179) at 12 months. There was a statistically significant reduction at 3 months in two of the hospitals that participated in the study [adjusted rate ratio at 3 months was 0.452 (95% CI 0.222 to 0.923) in hospital 3 and 0.567 (95% CI 0.328 to 0.983) in hospital 4]. Conclusion Overall, the intervention did not reduce the number of emergency visits and hospital admissions. However, a significant effect was observed in centres were a high acceptance rate of treatment recommendations was achieved.
Assuntos
Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/tendências , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/tendências , Farmacêuticos/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/métodos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have gradually entered the Czech market as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists and parenteral anticoagulants since 2008. Considering the eventual changes, the aim was to evaluate drug use and expenditure patterns on anticoagulants in the Czech Republic. A retrospective utilization study was conducted retrieving data from the State Institute for Drug Control database, including reports on drug supplies from distributors with anatomical therapeutic chemical classification (ATC) codes B01AA, B01AB, B01AE, B01AF, and B01AX. The utilization on national level was expressed as the ratio of the number of defined daily doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/TID). Expenditures on all anticoagulants were also assessed. Data was analyzed using PASW (version 18.0). Between January 2007 and December 2017, the national anticoagulant utilization rate increased continuously from 14.15 to 27.67 DDD/TID. The use of DOACs was 0.002 DDD/TID in 2008, increased to 6.04 DDD/TID in 2017. Warfarin utilization, after a small decrease in 2008, has shown nearly stable levels in the recent years (70.9% of all anticoagulants; mean 11.55 DDD/TID over the last 5 years), while its increase was halted by the spread of DOACs utilization (p < 0.05). In 2017, over half of the expenditures (51.1%) were due to oral anticoagulants, whereof 47.6% was related to DOACs. The results reflected a growing utilization and increasing costs of all anticoagulants, especially in DOACs at the expense of warfarin. Still, additional information regarding patient persistence and prescribing patterns is needed for a better understanding of oral anticoagulant utilization.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/economia , República Tcheca , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Background: AF, anticoagulation, NOACs, changing patterns of prescription. Methods: We describe baseline data and treatment patterns of patients recruited in Belgium in the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF). Recruitment began when novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were introduced and provides a unique picture of changing treatment patterns over time. 1713 patients with a new (≤6 weeks duration) diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and at least one investigator-defined stroke risk factor were recruited between May 2012 and August 2016, and will be prospectively followed for at least 2 years. Results: Overall, anticoagulant use in Belgium was higher than in the rest of Europe: 80.1% of patients received an anticoagulant ± antiplatelet (AP) therapy (14.5% on vitamin K antagonists; 65.6% on NOAC), 10.7% AP therapy and 9.3% no antithrombotic therapy. Over time, we observed an increase in anticoagulant use and a decrease in AP use for stroke prevention. NOAC use in Belgium was the highest of Europe at the study start, with many countries catching up later. In high stroke risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2), anticoagulants were used in 84.3%, leaving 15.7% unprotected. In low risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc 0-1) anticoagulants were overused (58.7%). Factor Xa inhibitors were used more frequently than direct thrombin inhibitors. Conclusion: Guideline adherence on stroke prevention was higher in Belgium than in the rest of Europe, and increased over time. NOAC use in Belgium was the highest of Europe at the study start, with many countries catching up later. Possible reasons are discussed. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01090362.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Bélgica , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of blood pressure lowering (BPL) agents are being prescribed for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, especially in the older population. The aim of this study is to describe the temporal trends and patterns of BPL dispensing among older Australians (aged ≥65 years). METHODS: We utilized prescription claims data from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) for a 10% random sample of people aged ≥65 years. The PBS, funded by the Federal government, provides subsidies to make medicines more affordable for Australian residents. We restricted our analysis to "long-term concession" individuals, who would use PBS for the majority of their medication needs. BPL agents were identified using the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes. The annual prevalences and proportional distributions of BPL dispensing by categories were summarized from 2006 to 2016. Direct standardization was applied to indicate changes of BPL dispensing over time. RESULTS: Age-standardized dispensing of BPL agents increased by 8% among older Australians from 2006 to 2016 (58%-66%). BPL dispensing in males has exceeded that in females since 2009. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers were the dominant BPL agents dispensed, with more than 55% of all BPL users over time. Dispensing of diuretics decreased from 27% to 21%, calcium channel blockers decreased from 30% to 25%, while ß-blockers remained stable (29%-31%). The use of fixed-dose combinations increased over time from 23% to 31%. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of BPL dispensing steadily increased among older Australians from 2006 to 2016. The changes in the patterns of BPL dispensing were largely in line with contemporary changes to clinical guidelines for an aging population.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Several treatments have been developed, including rifaximin for the treatment of IBS without constipation (non-IBS-C), but no studies have evaluated the effect of these therapies on patient referral rates to tertiary care gastroenterology clinics. AIM: To assess referral patterns for IBS patients at a tertiary motility clinic over a 10-year period. METHODS: Data from consecutive patients referred to the clinic during 2006-2016 were analyzed. Trends in the proportion of referrals and prior rifaximin use in IBS-C versus non-IBS-C groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 814 adult patients were referred to a single physician panel for IBS-related symptoms. Of these, 776 were included in the study [528 females (68%), average age 45.7 ± 15.9 years), comprising 431 IBS-C (55.5%) and 345 non-IBS-C (44.5%) patients. The proportion of non-IBS-C referrals declined significantly from 53.0% in 2006 to 27.3% in 2016 (Chi-square, p < 0.0001, Cochran-Armitage trend test p = 0.0001), and the proportion of IBS-C referrals increased significantly from 46.9% in 2006 to 72.7% in 2016 (Chi-square, p < 0.0001, Cochran-Armitage trend test p = 0.0004). Non-IBS-C referrals with prior rifaximin use significantly increased from 22.7% in 2006 to 66.7% in 2016 (Cochran-Armitage trend test, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a significantly declining tertiary care referral rate for non-IBS-C over the past decade. While not directly linked, there has been an increase in rifaximin use in the same population during the same time interval.
Assuntos
Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Encaminhamento e Consulta/tendências , Rifaximina/uso terapêutico , Centros de Atenção Terciária/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/epidemiologia , Los Angeles/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine whether Ohio House Bill 341, which mandated the use of Ohio's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), was an effective regulatory strategy to reduce opioid and benzodiazepine dispensing. METHOD: Secondary analysis of Ohio's PDMP data on prescription opioids and benzodiazepines dispensed from November 2014 to March 2017. An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to determine if there was a significant change in the quantity of opioids and benzodiazepines dispensed. RESULTS: After HB341 became effective in April 2015, there was a statistically significant decrease in the monthly quantity (number of pills) opioids and benzodiazepines dispensed in Ohio. There was a modest increase in the mean days' supply of opioids and no change in the mean morphine equivalent dose. CONCLUSIONS: Legislation in Ohio requiring prescribers to check the PDMP was effective in reducing the quantity of opioids and benzodiazepines dispensed.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Benzodiazepinas , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , OhioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Statins have become standard of care in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to examine the trends in statin use among Australians aged ≥ 65 years for the period 2007-2016. METHODS: Data from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme covering a 10% random sample of the Australian population were analysed. The 1-year prevalence and incidence of statin use were determined for each year, as were the percentage of statin dispensations according to statin type or intensity and the percentage of new users prescribed each statin type or intensity. To describe relative changes, age-sex adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined via Poisson regression modelling using 2007 as the reference year. RESULTS: The 1-year prevalence of statin use increased consistently each year from 34.2% in 2007 to 44.1% in 2016 (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.28-1.31). The 1-year incidence was 68.5 per 1000 in 2007 and 59.0 per 1000 in 2016 (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.90). Women were 18% (age-adjusted rate ratio [aRR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.83) less likely than men to initiate statins across all years. The incidence of statin use was also highest among individuals aged 65-74 years, who were about 15% (sex-adjusted rate ratio [sRR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.16) and 45% (sRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.44-1.47) more likely to initiate statins than those aged 75-84 and ≥ 85 years, respectively. Atorvastatin was the most commonly dispensed statin across all years. The proportion of new users dispensed high-intensity statins increased year-on-year from 23.6% in 2007 to 30.5% in 2016 (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.21-1.31). CONCLUSION: The proportion of older adults in Australia using statins has increased over the last decade, although the incidence has declined. Atorvastatin is the most commonly dispensed statin and the use of high intensity statin has increased.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Assistência Farmacêutica/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
AIMS: Knowledge on the use of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication among older adults is limited. We hypothesized that ADHD medication is used off-label in adults aged ≥50 years as part of palliative care in e.g. cancer patients. The aim of this study was to describe the use of ADHD medication among adults aged ≥50 years in Denmark. METHODS: Using the Danish health registries, we identified new users ≥50 years of ADHD medication during 2000-2012. We estimated the annual incidence of ADHD medication use and ADHD diagnoses. We described new users of ADHD medication according to co-medication, comorbidities and assessed the 1-year cumulative mortality rate. A posthoc analysis allowed us to include new users until 2015. RESULTS: We identified 6690 new users of ADHD medication from 2000 to 2012. From 2000 to 2015 we observed an increase in the incidence of ADHD medication use from 12.5 to 30.3 per 100 000 person-years. However, the incidence rate decreased from 2010 to 2015. Throughout the study period, the incidence rate of ADHD diagnoses was low (overall prevalence among new users ≤2%). Opioids were the most frequent comedication used (used by 54%), while cancer was the most frequent diagnosis preceding treatment (prevalence of 52%). The 1-year cumulative mortality was 50%, primarily driven by patients with a preceding cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: There was an increase in the incidence of ADHD medication use in adults aged ≥50 years from 2000-2010 and a decreasing incidence from 2010-2015. Our results suggest that ADHD medication is used off-label in older adults as part of palliative care.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/epidemiologia , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Uso Off-Label/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Comorbidade , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/tendências , Prevalência , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate person-level agreement between medication exposure as predicted using the PRE2DUP (a prescription-based design to estimate continuous drug use) method and postmortem toxicological findings, in the Swedish population during the years 2006 to 2013. METHODS: Using the Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine's toxicology database and the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare's registries on causes of death, dispensed medications, and in-patient care, forensic-toxicological findings were compared with prescription-based estimates of drug use for 27 medications. We modeled expected drug-use periods with the PRE2DUP using an algorithm of demonstrated high validity that evaluates personal drug-purchasing patterns with consideration to possible stockpiling of drugs and package information. Excluding criteria included self-inflicted death and recent in-patient care. RESULTS: In data from 18 627 performed autopsies, as well as 10 160 instances of dispensed drug use, the agreement between PRE2DUP drug-use periods and forensic toxicology was, overall, moderate (Cohen's kappa: 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.55-0.57]) with a positive predictive value, or predicted adherence rate, of 46.0%. The group-level predicted adherence and agreement were highest for antidepressants, at 71.0% (Cohen's kappa: 0.74 [CI: 0.73-0.76]), and lowest for cardiovascular drugs, at 21.5% (Cohen's kappa: 0.33 [CI: 0.31-0.36]). Predicted recreational use (negative predictive value) was low for all investigated drugs (0.0%-1.4%). The biological half-life explained 29% (P = 0.003) of the variability of the false-positive rate. CONCLUSIONS: Measured agreement between PRE2DUP-based drug-use estimates and forensic-toxicological findings is dependent upon a number of factors, including true continuous drug use and postmortem detectability of the investigated drugs, as well as the occurrence of unconventional dosing and true non-adherence.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Toxicologia Forense/normas , Vigilância da População , Prescrições/normas , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Toxicologia Forense/estatística & dados numéricos , Toxicologia Forense/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População/métodos , Prescrições/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/normas , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Suécia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
To analyze the biologics usage and expenditure for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in each prefecture throughout Japan using the national open database, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan disclosed; in Oct 2016, the data of the top 30 most-frequently prescribed drugs during a 1-year period from April 2014 to March 2015 in each prefecture in Japan, along with the patients' age and sex. Seldom-used drugs were excluded. We picked up only biologics for the present study. The total expenditure on biologics used in each prefecture was correlated with the population thereof. However, there was a big difference, up to ~ twofold, in the average expenditure used for an RA patient: highest in Toyama and lowest in Wakayama. There was also a big difference, ~ 4.5-fold, in the number of rheumatologists/1000 RA patients, highest in Kyoto and lowest in Aomori. The average expenditure used for an RA patient was correlated with the number of rheumatologists in the western part of Japan. Etanercept seemed to be used most frequently to Japanese RA patients followed closely by infliximab. Abatacept was used more frequently to the elderly than other biologics. There was a big difference in the number of rheumatologists and expenditure on biologics for the treatment of an RA patient among prefectures in fiscal 2014. Factors that brought this unevenness need to be scrutinized for universal implementation of good RA care throughout Japan, where there are uniform health insurance system and free access to rheumatologists.
Assuntos
Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Antirreumáticos/economia , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/economia , Produtos Biológicos/economia , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica , Reumatologistas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Reumatologistas/economia , Reumatologistas/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a frequent cause of neuropathic pain of the upper limb. Surgery is often proposed in second-line treatment, leading to an expected decrease in analgesic drug consumption. The main objective of this study was to investigate the variations in analgesic drug prescriptions, with a special focus on constant or increasing prescription patterns, before and after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study of French beneficiaries from the health insurance system in Midi-Pyrénées area. All patients undergoing carpel tunnel surgery during a specified period were identified and included. Definition of increased or constant prescription of analgesics was based on the comparison of the accumulated defined daily doses received by months and a difference between early preoperative (2 months before) and late postoperative period (2-12 months after surgery) superior to a -3.5 margin. We performed 4 multivariate logistic regression models to identify factors associated with increased or constant analgesic drug prescription patterns (for all analgesics, opioid, antineuropathic, nonopioid drugs). RESULTS: Among the 3665 patients included, 3255 (89%) received at least 1 analgesic drug during the late postoperative period (39% [n = 1426] for opioids and 15% [n = 563] for antineuropathic drugs). Prescription of analgesic, opioid, or antineuropathic drugs was maintained or increased in the late postoperative period in 11%, 5%, and 3% of the population, respectively. High levels of preoperative pain and female sex were associated with an increase in opioid use, whereas inpatient surgery (vs ambulatory surgery), high levels of preoperative pain, and psychiatric disorders were found to be associated with an increase in antineuropathic drug use. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that approximately 3% to 5% of patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery had persistent and even increased use of opioid or antineuropathic drugs more than 2 months after surgery, in relation with possible chronic postoperative pain. Considering the incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome, the risks associated with persistent opioid use in this population should be further monitored.
Assuntos
Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/epidemiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Bases de Dados Factuais , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Farmacoepidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Pegfilgrastim is indicated to reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia. As a cost-savings initiative, Pegfilgrastim Process Guidelines were developed and implemented at a large, academic teaching institution to improve appropriate use of pegfilgrastim and to decrease costs of outpatient infusion center administration by deferring doses to home self-administration for eligible patients. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review was conducted post-implementation of the Pegfilgrastim Process Guideline to evaluate the use of pegfilgrastim and to assess the safety and efficacy of transferring pegfilgrastim orders from outpatient infusion center to home administration for eligible patients. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in the study, with 35 patients receiving pegfilgrastim in the outpatient infusion center, 13 patients self-injecting at home, and 11 patients receiving doses in both settings. The total wholesale cost avoidance for pegfilgrastim orders transferred to self-administration at home during this time period totaled $205,163. The revenue from outpatient prescriptions of pegfilgrastim totaled $291,111.93. The percentage of febrile neutropenia admissions was 11.4%, 0%, and 9.1% in the outpatient infusion, home, and outpatient/home group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the Pegfilgrastim Process Guidelines demonstrated decreased total pegfilgrastim orders to be dispensed by the infusion center and a cost avoidance of $205,163 in four months without any perceivable changes in patient outcomes. This represents a significant cost-savings opportunity.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/métodos , Redução de Custos/métodos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Filgrastim/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/tendências , Adulto , Redução de Custos/tendências , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício/tendências , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Filgrastim/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/economia , Polietilenoglicóis/economia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
This study assessed the prescribing pattern of irrational use of antibiotic among children under age of 12 years in public and private sector hospitals in Pakistan. The prospective clinical evaluation of drug utilization pattern of antimicrobials from Patient Bedside File (PBF) of in-patients and Culture Sensitivity Test (CST) reports were evaluated to determine the antibiotic resistance. Two indicators recorded to assess antibiotic prescribing were; dose of prescribed antibiotic (low-dose, rational and high -dose) and Indication (valid or invalid). Antibiotics resistance for 25 selected antibiotics was determined by culture sensitivity test. This study showed that in Private Sector Hospital 77.7% neonates, 13.3% infants and 9% children admitted in ICU were receiving antibiotics, among them only 57.3% neonates, 62% infants and 59.9% children were found valid that is prescribed antibiotics for right indication. 27% neonates, 19% infants and 22.1% children were prescribed under dose of antibiotics, which may lead to antimicrobial resistance and increased cost of hospital stay. Only 29.1% neonates, 30% infants and 36.8% children were receiving rational dosing. In Public Sector Hospital, 65.6% neonates, 19.4% infants and 15% children were receiving antibiotics. Among them valid indication was found in 35.3% neonates, 35.6% infants and 39.8% in children. 33.3% neonates, 26.6% infants and 28.2% children were receiving under dose that may lead to resistance not only among those who were prescribed under dose but also such bacteria become resistant and spread to other population to increase antimicrobial resistance. The irrational prescribing of antibiotics was found very high (above 50%) in Public sector hospital (Hospital-B) for every age group whereas in Private sector hospital (Hospital-A) this practice was found near to 50%. In this study the prescribing frequency of Amikacin, Cefixime, Cefotaxime, Meropenem, Amoxicillin, Vancomycin, Azithromycin, Levofloxacin and Clarithromycin was found above 80% in both hospitals (A and B). Among these, Amoxicillin, Penicillin, Erythromycin and Cephalexin showed higher resistance i.e. 49.2%.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/tendências , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Centros de Atenção Terciária/tendências , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Esquema de Medicação , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Feminino , Hospitais Privados/tendências , Hospitais Públicos/tendências , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Paquistão , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Procedimentos Desnecessários/tendênciasRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe contemporary trends of P2Y12 inhibitor use in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or chronic kidney disease (CKD) who have a higher risk of recurring ACS and may benefit from treatment with higher efficacy third-generation agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor). DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: A large U.S. commercial insurance program (2009-2015). PATIENTS: P2Y12 inhibitor initiated within 2 weeks after an ACS event. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 98,649 P2Y12 inhibitor initiators, of whom 24.5% had comorbid DM (no CKD), 10.5% had CKD (no DM), and 12.6% had DM and CKD. Overall, 85.2% of patients initiated clopidogrel, followed by prasugrel (11.6%) and ticagrelor (3.2%). Prasugrel use decreased over time irrespective of preexisting DM and/or CKD; ticagrelor use increased. In logistic regression models accounting for patient demographics and clinical covariates, preexisting DM alone was not associated with prasugrel or ticagrelor versus clopidogrel treatment initiation; however, having CKD with or without DM significantly reduced the likelihood of receiving prasugrel versus clopidogrel (odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.88 for CKD alone; OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.98 for DM and CKD). Comorbid DM and CKD reduced the odds of initiating ticagrelor versus clopidogrel (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.92). PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: We observed lower or similar use of prasugrel and ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with ACS and comorbid DM and/or CKD. Given the potential for worse clinical outcomes with clopidogrel in these patients, our findings highlight the need to investigate the implications of these trends on recurrent ACS and bleeding events.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/sangue , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/complicações , Adenosina/administração & dosagem , Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Clopidogrel , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/sangue , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidina/administração & dosagem , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Background The prescription is one of the factors that influences rational use of medicines. The evaluation of prescribing indicators should contribute to organization of primary health care services. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate prescribing indicators and associated factors in primary health care in the northeast health district, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Setting Twenty primary health care units in the Northeast Health District, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Method The study was cross sectional. Indicators proposed by World Health Organization were used to evaluate rational use of medicines. Main outcome measure Indicators evaluated were average number of medicines per prescription, proportion of medicines with antibiotic, injectable, medicines prescribed by generic name and medicines present in the essential medicines list. Results Three hundred and ninety-nine patients were interviewed. The average number of medicines per prescription was 3.5 (SD 2.2). The proportion of medicines with antibiotic, injectable, medicines prescribed by generic name and medicines present in the essential medicines list was 17.8, 9.8, 94.9, 91.4%, respectively. Patient age ≥60 years was positively associated with number of medicines per prescription (P = 0.00). Conclusion In the northeast health district of Belo Horizonte, the proportion of prescriptions of antibiotics and injections, the adoption of prescribing by generic name and the prescribing of essential medicines were satisfactory in this study considering reference values for these indicators and international scientific literature. However, the mean number of prescribed medicines requires a more in-depth evaluation.