Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 464
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303537, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753671

RESUMO

Various injectants are available for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different injection therapies in alleviating the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Various databases were searched for relevant studies from inception until May 10, 2023. Eligible studies were identified using the patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcomes (O) model, which involved (P) participants with carpal tunnel syndrome, (I) an intervention based on injection therapy, (C) the use of placebo or another injectant as a control treatment, and (O) the measurement of clinical and electrodiagnostic outcomes of interest. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. The network meta-analysis revealed that platelet-rich plasma is effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of symptom and pain relief and functional improvement in both the short and long term, whereas steroids are effective only in the short term. Additionally, injections of dextrose solution may offer long-term pain relief as well as short- and long-term symptom alleviation and functional improvement. The study findings suggest that platelet-rich plasma should be used as the first-line treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, with dextrose and steroids serving as alternative treatment options.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/terapia , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Metanálise em Rede , Injeções , Glucose/administração & dosagem
2.
Ideggyogy Sz ; 77(3-4): 121-129, 2024 Mar 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591925

RESUMO

Background and purpose:

We aimed to investigate the difference of clinical and electrophysiological improvement between perineural corticosteroid injection therapy (PCIT) and perineural 5% dextrose injection therapy (5%PDIT) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

. Methods:

Total of 92 wrists that were diagnosed as mild-to-moderate idiopathic CTS and completed their follow-up were included in our study. The severity of pain, symptom severity and functional status were asses­sed by visual analog scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores for treatment effectiveness. Randomized wrists were administered PCIT or 5%PDIT accompanied by ultrasound guidance. VAS, BCTQ scores and the electro­physiological study repeated before and after treatment at the 1st and 6th months after perineural injection therapies (PITs) were recorded.

. Results:

Compared with baseline data, within groups there was significant improvement in VAS, BCTQ severity and function scores at 1st and 6th months follow-up (all p < 0.001). Considerable advance were detected in the median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) when pretreatment values were compared with posttreatment first month in both groups (p = 0.01; p < 0.001, respectively). No significant change occurred in median distal motor latency (DML) values between the 1st and 6th months in the groups (p = 0.095; p = 0.113, respectively). No significant difference was observed bet­ween 5%PDIT and PCIT groups.

. Conclusion:

Clinical and electrophysiologic improvement in CTS began from 1st month after PCIT and 5%PDIT. At the 6th month follow-up of the patients, 5%PDIT and PCIT had similar therapeutic effects. As a result, we can consider the replacement of PCIT with 5%PDIT in mild-to-moderate CTS patients especially in those who are hesitant because of the corticosteroid’s adverse effects.

.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Punho , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Glucose
4.
J Clin Neurosci ; 123: 55-61, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38531195

RESUMO

AIM: This study compared the efficacy and safety of local corticosteroid injection (LCI) vs intramuscular (IM) corticosteroid injection in mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: This is an open labeled, randomized controlled trial conducted during December 2021 to August 2023. Eighty-six patients with CTS were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either single 40 mg methylprednisolone (MP) injection at the wrist (LCI arm), or single 40 mg MP intramuscular injection (IM arm) in the deltoid. Primary outcome was absolute Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were SSS score at 1-month, Functional Status Scale (FSS) score at 1 and 3 months, and recurrence at 3 months and injection site pain assessed on visual analog (VAS) scale. RESULTS: Median age was 45 (range 22 - 80) years, and 86 % were females. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean SSS score at 3 months was similar in two arms (1.72 ± 0.71 vs 2.0 ± 0.93) with mean difference (MD) -0.03 (-0.31 to 0.25, p = 0.83) after adjusting for baseline SSS scores. LCI, however, resulted in significantly better SSS (1.48 ± 0.51 vs 1.88 ± 0.69, adjusted p = 0.04), and FSS scores (1.57 ± 0.44 vs 1.80 ± 0.66, adjusted p = 0.03) at 1 month compared to IM arm. Response rate (67.4 % vs 55.8 %; p = 0.30) and recurrence rate (17.1 % vs 22.6 %, p = 0.74) at 3 months were similar. Injection site pain was severe in LCI arm[median 5 (range 3 - 8) vs median 3 (range 2 - 6)]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild to moderate CTS, LCI resulted in better improvement in the BCTQ scores at 1 month compared to IM steroid. However, 3-month's outcome was similar. Intramuscular steroid injection was better tolerated.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Metilprednisolona , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Injeções Intramusculares/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem
6.
Pain Med ; 25(5): 327-333, 2024 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281082

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Recently, there has been a renewed interest in traditional medicine for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Curcumin has been reported as an agent with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and neuroprotective attributes. This study is one of the first investigations to assess the effect of curcumin gel on CTS. METHODS: This study is a prospective, 8-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 70 patients with CTS were analyzed. The intervention group (n = 35) received a topical curcumin gel and a night wrist splint and the control group (n = 35) received a placebo gel and a night wrist splint for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the assessment of the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS) of the participants using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) after 8 weeks. In addition, all participants were evaluated by electrodiagnostic (EDX) test at baseline and after 8 weeks. RESULTS: The mean scores of SSS demonstrated a significant decrease in the curcumin group compared to the placebo group; P-value= 0.021. The mean change score of SSS after the intervention was 12.45 ± 8.18 in curcumin and 3.28 ± 7.06 in the placebo group; P-value = 0.0001 and the mean change score of FSS were 6.24 ± 4.91 and 2.31 ± 4.95 in curcumin and placebo groups, respectively; P-value = 0.002. However, the EDX study showed no significant changes in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: It seems that curcumin gel could be effective in the improvement of the symptom severity and daily activity of patients with CTS.


Assuntos
Administração Tópica , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Curcumina , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Curcumina/uso terapêutico , Curcumina/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
8.
J Ultrasound Med ; 43(4): 751-760, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240323

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study compared levels of discomfort among three positions for ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel injections (USCTI) to potentially facilitate and improve the procedure's tolerability in treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: Ambulatory Veterans referred for electromyography (EMG) evaluation of CTS were eligible for the study; a total of 30 participants were evaluated. Participants were asked to hold three different positions: 1) Hypersupination, 2) Airplane, and 3) total supported abduction (TSA). Participants rated their pain level, ease of performing/holding each position, exacerbation of underlying symptoms, and position preference. Results were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Hypersupination was determined to be the least preferred and most painful position to hold, demonstrating a statistically significant increase in the Numeric Rating Scale score for pain during the procedure compared with Airplane and TSA, which were not significantly different from one another. Pre-procedure neck, shoulder, elbow, and wrist pain were not significantly associated with intra-procedure pain. CONCLUSIONS: When performing USCTI, patient comfort can be optimized by avoiding Hypersupination. Utilizing the Airplane or TSA positions may provide similar access for ulnar approach injections while inducing lower levels of discomfort. Clinical space, resources, patient mobility, and laterality of procedures may further guide one's selection among the positions.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Preferência do Paciente , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Ultrassonografia , Dor , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
9.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 30(1): 38-45, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37016767

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy and rarely develops after drug therapy. This study describes the clinical, electrodiagnostic (EDX), and ultrasound (US) findings in seven patients who experienced CTS due to anti-cancer therapeutic agents. METHODS: All patients underwent EDX testing, and four patients had an US study. RESULTS: CTS occurred in four patients with aromatase inhibitors, two with immune checkpoint inhibitors, and one with a selective estrogen receptor modulator. The mean duration between initiation of the anti-cancer therapeutic agents and symptom onset was 6 weeks (range: 2-12 weeks). Decreased digit sensation was noted in all patients; wasting and weakness of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) was observed in three (42.8%) patients. The compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) of the APB and sensory nerve action potentials of the second or third digit could not be recorded in two (28.5%) and four (57.1%) patients, respectively. The needle EMG detected fibrillations and positive sharp waves in the APB in two patients. The motor unit potentials of the APB were decreased with large polyphasics in three (42.8%) patients. Of the four patients who underwent US testing, all had increased cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel inlet, three (75%) had thenar muscle atrophy, and two (50%) had a loss of fascicular pattern. Three (42.8%) patients underwent a CTR. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should be cognizant of the relationship between anti-cancer therapeutic agents and CTS. EDX studies and US play important roles in the diagnostic assessment of such patients.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico por imagem , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Nervo Mediano , Músculo Esquelético/inervação , Polegar , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico
10.
Asian J Surg ; 47(1): 89-99, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37147265

RESUMO

The comparative effect of commonly used conservative treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome remained controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effect of local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was conducted to identify relevant randomized clinical trials published before 21st Mar 2023. Two independent reviewers assayed quality of included studies using the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool. Relevant data were extracted and pooled analyses were conducted. Outcome measurements included Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, visual analogue scale and some electrophysiology tests, while the former two were set as the primary outcomes. Subgroup analysis and sensitive analysis were performed and publication bias was evaluated. Heterogeneity among the included studies was examined using the I2 statistic. After selection, 12 studies were identified eligibility for inclusion. Only one study was found to have a high risk of bias. Pooled data of primary outcomes did not show any differences between treatments, and subgroup analysis supported the results. However, patients treated with local corticosteroid injection showed better improvement in distal motor latency (p = 0.002) and compound muscle action potential (p = 0.04). Some studies failed to pass the sensitive analysis, indicating the related analysis might be not so stable. A slight publication bias was observed in subgroup analysis of function scales, among three publication bias test. In conclusion, compared to physical therapy, local corticosteroid injection might have better treatment effects on carpal tunnel syndrome.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Humanos , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Tratamento Conservador , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Ann Pharmacother ; 58(3): 205-213, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278013

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The most prevalent entrapment neuropathy is carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Although nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently prescribed for musculoskeletal disorders, oral NSAIDs do not provide any additional benefits for CTS. Nevertheless, the use of NSAID phonophoresis has shown significant improvement, possibly due to increased concentration in the target tissue. The effects of intracarpal injection of NSAIDs on CTS have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a controlled trial to compare the efficacy of ketorolac and triamcinolone in treating CTS. METHODS: Mild to moderate CTS patients were randomly assigned to receive either a local injection of 30 mg ketorolac or 40 mg triamcinolone. Patients were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, severity, function, electrodiagnostic findings, patient satisfaction, and any complications at the injection site, at baseline and 12 weeks after the procedures. RESULTS: Fifty patients participated, and 43 completed the study. Both groups showed significant improvement in the VAS, severity, function, and electrodiagnostic scores at 3 months compared with the baseline. A comparison of the groups showed significant differences in VAS, severity, and function, with the improvement being significantly higher in the triamcinolone group. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The present study showed that injection of triamcinolone or ketorolac into the carpal tunnel relieved pain, increased function, and improved electrodiagnostic findings in patients with mild to moderate CTS. It also showed that triamcinolone was superior to ketorolac in terms of analgesic effect and resulted in greater improvement in symptom severity and function.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Triancinolona , Humanos , Triancinolona/efeitos adversos , Cetorolaco/efeitos adversos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
Ideggyogy Sz ; 76(9-10): 319-326, 2023 Sep 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37782062

RESUMO

Background and purpose:

In this study, we analyzed the effect of oral and oral + intravenous Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) treatment on pain level and physical examination findings in patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

. Methods:

A total of 115 patients patricipa­ted in the study. Physiotherapy and wrist splint were first applied to all patients diag­nosed with CTS in the study. 40 patients were treated with oral ALA after iv. ALA the­rapy, 35 patients received only oral ALA treatment and 40 patients did not receive any medication. The patients were divided into 3 groups as those who received only splint treatment and physiotherapy, those who received oral ALA treatment, and those who received oral ALA treatment after iv. treat­ment. All patients were assessed be­fore the treatment, and at the 1st and 3rd months of the treatment. In clinical assessment, visual analog scale (VAS) forms were filled to define the pain severity, the Boston symptom severity scale (BSSS) and Boston functional status scale (BFDS) were filled for evaluating symptoms and functional status. 

. Results:

VAS, BSSS and BFDS scores of the patients who were treated with intravenous and then oral ALA were found to be significantly lower at the end of both the 1st and 3rd months compared to the patients who received only oral ALA or no medication (p=0.001; p<0.001), (p=0.001; p<0.001), (p=0.006; p<0.001).

. Conclusion:

We think that iv. ALA is effective in the treatment of symptoms associated with CTS.

 

.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Ácido Tióctico , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/complicações , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Ácido Tióctico/uso terapêutico , Dor , Medição da Dor
13.
Cell Mol Neurobiol ; 43(8): 4333-4344, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878141

RESUMO

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The present study sought to identify putative causal proteins for CTS. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal association between 2859 plasma proteins (N = 35,559) and CTS (N = 1,239,680) based on the published GWAS summary statistics. Then we replicated the significant associations using an independent plasma proteome GWAS (N = 10,708). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the robustness of MR results. Multivariate MR and mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the mediation effects of body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and arm tissue composition on the association between putative causal proteins and CTS. Colocalization analysis was used to examine whether the identified proteins and CTS shared causal variant(s). Finally, we evaluated druggability of the identified proteins. Ten plasma proteins were identified as putative causal markers for CTS, including sCD14, PVR, LTOR3, CTSS, SIGIRR, IFNL3, ASPN, TM11D, ASIP, and ITIH1. Sensitivity analyses and reverse MR analysis validated the robustness of their causal effects. Arm tissue composition, BMI, and T2D may play a fully/partial mediating role in the causal relationships of ASIP, TM11D, IFNL3, PVR, and LTOR3 with CTS. The association of ASPN and sCD14 with CTS were supported by colocalization analysis. Druggability assessment demonstrated that sCD14, CTSS, TM11D, and IFNL3 were potential drug therapeutic targets. The present study identified several potential plasma proteins that were causally associated with CTS risk, providing new insights into the pathogenesis of protein-mediated CTS and offering potential targets for new therapies.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Proteínas Sanguíneas/genética , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/genética , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Receptores de Lipopolissacarídeos , Análise da Randomização Mendeliana
14.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol ; 28(4): 453-460, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37758495

RESUMO

Background: This study aimed to clarify the influence of preoperative electrodiagnostic (EDX) utilisation and its severity on surgically treated patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: This retrospective study analysed the data of patients who underwent CTS surgery at our facility from 2012 to 2022. Data regarding age, sex, affected side, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, haemodialysis and insurance type were collected, along with the following clinical information: utilisation of EDX, steroid injection, number of items of preoperative physical examination and history taking, intervals between symptom onset and the initial visit and between the initial visit and surgery, type of surgical procedure and surgery categorisation (primary or revision). EDX data (EDX severity, interval between EDX and surgery and concomitant nerve lesions) were also investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the influence of EDX utilisation and severity on clinical parameters. Results: Of the 343 hands enrolled in our study, 304 (89%) underwent preoperative EDX assessment. EDX severity was classified as normal, mild, moderate or severe in 6 (2%), 18 (6%), 102 (34%) and 178 hands (58%), respectively. After the univariate and multivariable analyses, more items of preoperative physical examination and history taking were associated with non-EDX utilisation, whereas younger age, female sex and steroid injection were associated with milder EDX. Conclusions: Increased number of items of preoperative physical examination and history taking or steroid injection were independently associated with non-EDX utilisation or milder EDX, respectively, suggesting that when thorough clinical evaluation is conducted, hand surgeons may be less likely to request for EDX before surgery. Moreover, their treatment recommendation may be influenced by EDX severity. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Humanos , Feminino , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Eletrodiagnóstico , Exame Físico , Esteroides/uso terapêutico
15.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 16248, 2023 09 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37758760

RESUMO

Knowledge about risks for overuse of psychoactive analgesics in patients having primary surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or ulnar nerve entrapment (UNE), or both, is limited. We investigated if patients with those nerve entrapment disorders have a higher risk of overuse of psychoactive analgesics (i.e., opioids and gabapentinoid drugs) before, after, and both before and after surgery than observed in the general population after accounting for demographical and socioeconomic factors. Using a large record linkage database, we analysed 5,966,444 individuals (25-80 years), residing in Sweden December 31st, 2010-2014, of which 31,380 underwent surgery 2011-2013 for CTS, UNE, or both, applying logistic regression to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Overall, overuse of the psychoactive analgesics was low in the general population. Compared to those individuals, unadjusted RR (95% CI) of overuse ranged in patients between 2.77 (2.57-3.00) with CTS after surgery and 6.21 (4.27-9.02) with both UNE and CTS after surgery. These risks were only slightly reduced after adjustment for demographical and socioeconomic factors. Patients undergoing surgery for CTS, UNE, or both, have a high risk of overuse of psychoactive analgesics before, after, and both before and after surgery.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa , Síndromes de Compressão do Nervo Ulnar , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Pacientes
16.
BMJ Open ; 13(9): e071488, 2023 09 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37723109

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of buffered and non-buffered long-acting local anaesthetics in pain relief during and after carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome. Surgical treatment of CTS, CTR, is the most common hand surgical operation. CTR is usually performed under local anaesthesia, the application of which is often the most painful event during the procedure. One important aspect of patient satisfaction is adequate pain management during and after CTR. Long-acting local anaesthetics provide good postoperative pain control. Adjunct bicarbonate has been shown to reduce pain during injection of local anaesthetic and to prolong its analgesic effect. To date, no published randomised controlled trial has compared buffered to non-buffered long-acting local anaesthetic during CTR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will randomly assign 116 patients with CTS to receive buffered or non-buffered mixtures of lidocaine and bupivacaine with epinephrine before CTR. The primary outcome is overall pain experienced during the injection of local anaesthetic, assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale. The secondary outcomes are pain intensity from the injection and during CTR, use of painkillers and pain intensity every 4 hours until third postoperative night, symptom severity and functional status preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery, and patient-rated outcome measures at 3 months after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Savo Hospital District (2311/2021). The study will be performed according to the principles of good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. The results are expected to be presented in an international hand surgical conference and the manuscript to be sent to a hand surgery-orientated peer-reviewed journal during 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered to clinicaltrials.gov, study ID NCT05328180.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Bicarbonatos , Anestesia Local , Dor , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
17.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 24(1): 645, 2023 Aug 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37563725

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to summarize, synthesize, and integrate the evidence evaluating the effectiveness of biophysical agents compared to other conservative treatments, for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: This was an overview of systematic reviews (SRs). We searched several online databases and obtained SRs relating to managing CTS using biophysical agents. Two independent researchers screened and appraised the quality of the SRs using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2 appraisal tool. We extracted information related to study characteristics as well as the effectiveness of biophysical agents for CTS, the effect sizes, and between-group significances. We categorized the information based on the type of biophysical agent. We also performed a citation mapping and calculated the corrected covered area index. RESULTS: We found 17 SRs addressing 12 different biophysical agents. The quality of the SRs was mainly critically low (n = 16) or low (n = 1). The evidence was inconclusive for the effectiveness of Low-level Laser therapy and favorable for the short-term efficacy of non-thermal ultrasound in improving symptom severity, function, pain, global rating of improvement, satisfaction with treatment, and other electrophysiological measures compared to manual therapy or placebo. Evidence was inconclusive for Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy, and favorable for the short-term effectiveness of Shortwave and Microwave Diathermy on pain and hand function. The corrected covered area index was lower than 35% indicating a low overlap of the SRs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings were based on low-quality primary studies, with an unclear or high risk of bias, small sample sizes, and short follow-ups. Therefore, no recommendations can be made for the long-term effectiveness of any biophysical agents. High-quality evidence is needed to support evidence-based recommendations on the use of biophysical agents in the management of CTS. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022319002, registered on 17/04/2022.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Tratamento por Ondas de Choque Extracorpóreas , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Manejo da Dor , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto
18.
Clin J Pain ; 39(11): 604-610, 2023 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37584413

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of pregabalin for the control of symptoms in mild to moderate idiopathic Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 146 mild to moderate idiopathic CTS patients were randomized into pregabalin (n=74) and placebo groups (n=72). Per protocol, analysis was conducted with 131 patients; pregabalin (n=65) and placebo (n=66). The drug titration dose was 50 mg once daily for the first week, twice daily for the second week and thrice daily for the next 6 weeks. The primary outcome included a change in the Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale (FSS) of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after the eighth week. The secondary outcome was the change in clinical and electrophysiological grading after 8 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in the mean Symptom Severity Scale (14.92±3.72 vs. 16.55±4.45; P =0.025) and FSS (10.77±2.64 vs. 12.0±2.55; P =0.007) in the pregabalin group after 8 weeks. Mean clinical and electrophysiological grading changed significantly from 2.3±0.7 to 2.1±0.8 ( P =0.001) and 1.9±0.7 to 1.8±0.8 ( P =0.020), respectively in the pregabalin group but not in the placebo group. DISCUSSION: The results of this study demonstrates that pregabalin is effective in ameliorating symptoms and improving functional outcomes in mild to moderate idiopathic CTS.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Pregabalina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
J Hand Surg Am ; 48(8): 770-779, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37318406

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Evidence for the use of prophylactic antibiotics in clean hand surgery is limited, yet surgeons continue to administer antibiotics to prevent postoperative infections. We sought to assess the effect of a program directed at reducing the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in carpal tunnel release surgery and elicit reasons for continued use. METHODS: A surgeon leader implemented a program between September 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019 to reduce antibiotic prophylaxis in clean hand surgeries in a hospital system of 10 medical centers. It consisted of (1) an evidence-based educational session for all participating orthopedic and hand surgeons during which the elimination of the use of antibiotics in clean hand surgeries was requested and (2) a year-long, monthly antibiotic use audit and feedback cycle using carpal tunnel release (CTR) as a proxy for clean hand surgery. The rate of antibiotic use in the year of the intervention was compared to the rate prior to the intervention. Multivariable regression was used to determine patient-related risk factors for receiving antibiotics. Participating surgeons completed a survey to elucidate factors that contributed to continued use. RESULTS: Antibiotic prophylaxis decreased from 1223/2379 (51%) in 2017-2018 to 531/2550 (21%) in 2018-2019. During the last month of evaluation, the rate decreased to 28/208 (14%). Logistic regression revealed a higher rate of antibiotic use during the period after the intervention among patients who had diabetes mellitus or who were operated upon by an older surgeon. The follow-up surgeon survey revealed a strong positive correlation between surgeon willingness to administer antibiotics and patient hemoglobin A1c and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of antibiotic use in carpal tunnel release decreased from 51% the year prior to 14% the final month of implementing a surgeon-led program to reduce antibiotic prophylaxis. Multiple barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice were identified. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/cirurgia , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA