The feasibility of medical unmanned aerial systems in suburban areas.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA) are one of the biggest challenges facing medical systems world-wide. Each year, more than 420,000 Americans experience cardiac arrests with a survival rate of approximately 10%.1 A large challenge to treating OHCA continues to be rapid access to AEDs which can increase survival rates up to 40%.1 While pivotal to an OHCA patient's survival, AEDs are not always readily available. Advances in unmanned aerial systems (UAS) - commonly referred to as drones - can provide a solution since UAS have the ability to rapidly carry an AED payload to an emergency site. This study examined the potential use of UAS delivered AEDs in suburban areas by using the Charlottesville-Albemarle area as an example. This study was carried out by using Geographical Information Systems mapping. Specifications of the Eagle drone model by Flirtey were used to develop a beneficial drone placement plan. Models were created with drones at first responder stations. Coverage area of the drones at first responder stations was compared to coverage area of drone units placed at "ideal" locations in the Charlottesville-Albemarle County area. Population statistics were gathered from the GIS program Social Explorer, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The "ideal" location placement plan was then evaluated for an estimate of total population covered by the system. Finally, ideal drone placements were evaluated and compared to response time and distances versus a local EMS ground unit. With the derived ideal placements, 70.08% of the area would have drone coverage that could deliver an AED in less than five minutes and 97.97% of the area would have coverage in less than 10 min. At minimum, 94.72% of the population would be covered by the ideal placements of drones within the area. Drone response time was significantly faster than ground EMS response by a factor of 5× (P value < .05). Drones were able to get to the incident scene of a theoretical OHCA faster without and with vertical response challenges. The results show that UAS delivery of AEDs is not only possible in the Charlottesville-Albemarle County area, but an effective way to decrease response time to improve chances of survival for a person experiencing an OHCA in similar suburban areas.

A National Study of American Indian and Alaska Native Substance Abuse Treatment: Provider and Program Characteristics.

American Indians and Alaska Natives (AIANs) experience major disparities in accessing quality care for mental health and substance use disorders. There are long-standing concerns about access to and quality of care for AIANs in rural and urban areas including the influence of staff and organizational factors, and attitudes toward evidence-based treatment for addiction. We conducted the first national survey of programs serving AIAN communities and examined workforce and programmatic differences between clinics located in urban/suburban (n=50) and rural (n=142) communities. We explored the correlates of openness toward using evidence-based treatments (EBTs). Programs located in rural areas were significantly less likely to have nurses, traditional healing consultants, or ceremonial providers on staff, to consult outside evaluators, to use strategic planning to improve program quality, to offer pharmacotherapies, pipe ceremonies, and cultural activities among their services, and to participate in research or program evaluation studies. They were significantly more likely to employ elders among their traditional healers, offer AA-open group recovery services, and collect data on treatment outcomes. Greater openness toward EBTs was related to a larger clinical staff, having addiction providers, being led by directors who perceived a gap in access to EBTs, and working with key stakeholders to improve access to services. Programs that provided early intervention services (American Society of Addiction Medicine level 0.5) reported less openness. This research provides baseline workforce and program level data that can be used to better understand changes in access and quality for AIAN over time.

Working Towards Safe Motherhood: Delays and Barriers to Prenatal Care for Women in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas of Georgia.

Objectives Georgia has the highest rate of maternal mortality in the United States, and ranks 40th for infant mortality. The Georgia Maternal and Infant Health Research Group was formed to investigate and address the shortage of obstetric care providers outside the Atlanta area. Because access to prenatal care (PNC) can improve maternal and infant health outcomes, we used qualitative methods to identify the access barriers experienced by women who live in rural and peri-urban areas of the state. Methods We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 24 mothers who gave birth between July and August 2013, and who live in either shortage or non-shortage obstetric care service areas. We also conducted key informant interviews with four perinatal case managers, and analyzed all data using applied thematic analysis. We then utilized Thaddeus and Maine's "Three Delays to Care" theoretical framework structure to describe the recognized barriers to care. Results We identified delays in a woman's decision to seek PNC (such as awareness of pregnancy and stigma); delays in accessing an appropriate healthcare facility (such as choosing a doctor and receiving insurance coverage); and delays in receiving adequate and appropriate care (such as continuity of care and communication). Moreover, many participants perceived low self-worth and believed this influenced their PNC exchanges. Conclusion As a means of supporting Georgia's pregnant women who face barriers and delays to PNC, these data provide a rationale for developing contextually relevant solutions to both mothers and their providers.

Initiating pain and palliative care outpatient services for the suburban underserved in Montgomery County, Maryland: Lessons learned at the NIH Clinical Center and MobileMed.

OBJECTIVE: With the ongoing expansion of palliative care services throughout the United States, meeting the needs of socioeconomically marginalized populations, as in all domains of healthcare, continues to be a challenge. Our specific aim here was to help meet some of these needs through expanding delivery of pain and palliative care services by establishing a new clinic for underserved patients and collecting descriptive data about its operation. METHOD: In November of 2014, the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center's Pain and Palliative Care Service (PPCS) launched a bimonthly offsite pain and palliative care outpatient clinic in collaboration with Mobile Medical Care Inc. (MobileMed), a private not-for-profit primary care provider in Montgomery County, Maryland, serving underserved area residents since 1968. Staffed by NIH hospice and palliative medicine clinical fellows and faculty, the clinic provides specialty pain and palliative care consultation services to patients referred by their primary care healthcare providers. A patient log was maintained, charts reviewed, and referring providers surveyed on their satisfaction with the service. RESULTS: The clinic had 27 patient encounters with 10 patients (6 males, 4 females, aged 23-67) during its first 7 months of operation. The reason for referral for all but one patient was chronic pain of multiple etiologies. Patients had numerous psychosocial stressors and comorbidities. All primary care providers who returned surveys (n = 4) rated their level of satisfaction with the consultation service as "very satisfied" or "extremely satisfied." SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: This brief descriptive report outlines the steps taken and logistical issues addressed to launch and continue the clinic, the characteristics of patients treated, and the results of quality-improvement projects. Lessons learned are highlighted and future directions suggested for the clinic and others that may come along like it.

Rural Patient Access to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Centers is Improved by a Novel Integrated Telemedicine Prehospital System.

BACKGROUND: As per American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines, the delay between first medical contact and balloon inflation should not exceed 90 min for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In North America, few prehospital systems have been developed to grant rural populations timely access to PCI. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the ability of an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) system serving suburban and rural populations to achieve the recommended 90-min interval benchmark for PCI. METHODS: A prehospital telemedicine program was implemented in a rural and suburban region of the Quebec province. Three patient groups with STEMI were created according to trajectory: 1) patients already en route to a PCI center, 2) patients initially directed to the nearest hospital who were subsequently diverted to a PCI center during transport, and 3) patients directed to the nearest hospital without transfer for PCI. Time intervals were compared across groups. RESULTS: Of the 208 patients diagnosed with STEMI, 14.9% were already on their way to a hospital with PCI capabilities, 75.0% were rerouted to a PCI center, and 10.1% were directed to the nearest local hospital. All patients but one arrived at the PCI center within the 60-min prehospital care interval, considering an additional 30 min for balloon inflation at the PCI center. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that a regionalized prehospital system for STEMI patients could achieve the recommended 90-min interval benchmark for PCI, while giving timely access to PCI to rural populations that would not otherwise have access to this treatment.

Primary care practices' perceived constraints to engaging in research: the importance of context and 'Flow'.

AIM: The primary purpose of this study is to understand primary care practices' perceived constraints to engaging in research from micro-, meso-, and macro-level perspectives. BACKGROUND: Past research has spotlighted various barriers and hurdles that primary care practices face when attempting to engage in research efforts; yet a majority of this research has focused exclusively on micro- (physician-specific) and meso-level (practice-specific) factors. Minimal attention has been paid to the context - the more macro-level issues such as how these barriers relate to primary care practices' role within the dominant payment/reimbursement model of U.S. health-care system. METHODS: Semi-structured focus groups were conducted in five U.S. practices, all owned by an independent academic medical center. Each had participated in at least one research study but were not part of a practice-based research network or affiliated with a medical school. Data were analyzed using NVIVO-9 by using a multistep coding process. Findings The perceived constraints offered by the participants echoed those featured in previous studies. Secondary analyses of the interconnected nature of these factors highlighted a valuable and sensitive 'Flow' that is evident at the individual, interaction, and organizational levels of primary care practice. Engaging in research appears to pose a significant threat to the outcomes of Flow (i.e., revenue, patient health outcomes, and the overall well-being of the practice). It is posited that the risk of not meeting expected productivity-based outcomes, which appear to be dictated by current dominant reimbursement models, frames the overall process of research-related decision making in primary care. Within the funding/reimbursement models of the US health-care system, engaging in research does not appear to be advantageous for primary care practices.

Simple, school-based mass distribution as a small-town strategy.

OBJECTIVE: Test a radically simple school-based point-of-dispensing model. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Community PARTICIPANTS: Community residents with children at one middle school. INTERVENTIONS: Rapid dispensing of medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): 1) Measure and extrapolate ability to distribute medications to Darien residents through school-based distribution model; 2) assess if using a limited staffing model with limited training was functional. Identify stress points; 3) understand the existing school communication model; 4) track and extrapolate the breakdown of adult-to-child doses distributed and compare to existing census data; and 5) measure throughput of school-based distribution model in the 50-minute drop-off period. RESULTS: 1) This exercise supported the concept that rapid medication distribution through the public schools is an appropriate strategy for health departments, particularly departments with limited resources. 2) Just-in-time briefing worked well as a training strategy. The primary stress points identified were in restock-if medication was in blister packs, we would not be able to stock vests with 100 of each as they are substantially bigger than mints. 3) The secure Darien Public School notification system was ideal for distributing information to parents since they tend to receive school communication on a regular basis and by definition, access is limited to town residents. 4) When asked about household size, most drivers indicated "two adults and two (or more) children." We distributed medication for 784 adults and 963 children. This ratio was higher than the 2010 Census, which had an average household size of 3.08 in Darien. 5) In 50 minutes, using a mix of Health Department and school staff, medication was distributed to 1,747 residents, almost 10 percent of the population. The hourly throughput from this model was distribution to 2,096 people per hour or 699 people per distributor per hour. This compares favorably to almost every other nonmedical distribution model. CONCLUSIONS: Using four Health Department staff and six public school staff, we distributed medication to 784 adults and 963 pediatric residents in 50 minutes at one school. If we extrapolated that across the six other public schools in Darien, we could provide medication to more than 10,000 residents within 8 hours. While we are cognizant of the limitations and drawbacks of this model, we strongly believe that it is the only practical solution to the problem of rapid distribution of medication to the entire community.

Does a primary care practice pharmacist improve the timeliness and completion of medication management reviews?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the effect of integrating a pharmacist into the general practice team on the timeliness and completion of pharmacist-conducted medication reviews. METHOD: A pharmacist was integrated into an Australian inner-city suburb general practice medical centre to provide medication reviews for practice patients. A retrospective analysis of medication reviews with two time periods was conducted: pre-integration of the practice pharmacist and post-integration of the practice pharmacist. In an effort to obtain a measure of external validity the data were compared to data from the Division of General Practice in which the medical centre is located. KEY FINDINGS: There were 70 patients referred for medication review in the pre-integration phase and 314 patients referred in the post-integration phase. The time to complete the medication review process was significantly reduced from a median of 56 days to 20 days with a practice pharmacist. Prior to having a practice pharmacist 52% of patients did not have the service billed by the general practitioner, which was reduced to 6% during the post-integration phase. CONCLUSION: The results from this trial show that the integration of a pharmacist into the general practice team was associated with an increase in the timeliness and completion rate of medication reviews.

Mental health care treatment initiation when mental health services are incorporated into primary care practice.

PURPOSE: Most primary care patients with mental health issues are identified or treated in primary care rather than the specialty mental health system. Primary care physicians report that their patients do not have access to needed mental health care. When referrals are made to the specialty behavioral or mental health care system, rates of patients who initiate treatment are low. Collaborative care models, with mental health clinicians as part of the primary care medical staff, have been suggested as an alternative. The aim of this study is to examine rates of treatment startup in 2 collaborative care settings: a rural family medicine office and a suburban internal medicine office. In both practices referrals for mental health services are made within the practice. METHODS: Referral data were drawn from 2 convenience samples of patients referred by primary care physicians for collaborative mental health treatment at Fletcher Allen Health Care in Vermont. The first sample consisted of 93 consecutively scheduled referrals in a family medicine office (sample A) between January 2006 and December 2007. The second sample consisted of 215 consecutive scheduled referrals at an internal medicine office (sample B) between January 2009 and December 2009. Referral data identified age, sex, and presenting mental health/medical problem. RESULTS: In sample A, 95.5% of those patients scheduling appointments began behavioral health treatment; in sample B this percentage was 82%. In sample B, 69% of all patients initially referred for mental health care both scheduled and initiated treatment. CONCLUSIONS: When referred to a mental health clinician who provides on-site access as part of a primary care mental health collaborative care model, a high percentage of patients referred scheduled care. Furthermore, of those who scheduled care, a high percentage of patients attend the scheduled appointment. Findings persist despite differences in practice type, populations, locations, and time frames of data collection. That the findings persist across the different offices suggests that this model of care may contain elements that improve the longstanding problem of poor treatment initiation rates when primary care physicians refer patients for outpatient behavioral health services.

Patients' and health professionals' perceptions of teamwork in primary care.

INTRODUCTION: Effective teamwork in primary care settings is integral to the ongoing health of those with chronic conditions. This study compares patient and health professional perceptions about teams, team membership, and team members' roles. This study aimed to test both the feasibility of undertaking a collaborative method of enquiry as a means of investigating patient perceptions about teamwork in the context of their current health care, and also to compare and contrast these views with those of their usual health professionals in New Zealand suburban general practice settings. METHODS: Using a qualitative methodology, 10 in-depth interviews with eight informants at two practices were conducted and data analysed using inductive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The methodology successfully elicited confidential interviews with both patients and the health professionals providing their care. Perceptions of the perceived value of team care and qualities facilitating good teamwork were largely concordant. Patient and health professionals differed in their knowledge and understanding about team roles and current chronic care programmes, and had differing perceptions about health care team leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the consensus that team-based care is essential for those with chronic conditions, but suggests important differences between patient and health professional views as to who should be in a health care team and what their respective roles might be in primary care settings. These differences are worthy of further exploration, as a lack of common understanding has the potential to consistently undermine otherwise well-intentioned efforts to achieve best possible health for patients with chronic conditions.

The role of interorganizational partnerships in health services provision among rural, suburban, and urban local health departments.

CONTEXT: With limited resources and increased public health challenges facing the US, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others have identified partnerships between local health departments (LHDs) and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) as critical to the public health system. LHDs utilize financial, human, and informational resources and develop partnerships with local NGOs to provide public health services. PURPOSE: Our study had 2 primary goals: (1) compare resources and partnerships characterizing rural, suburban, and urban LHDs, and (2) determine whether partnerships play a mediating role between LHD resources and the services LHDs provide. METHODS: We conducted secondary data analysis using the National Association of County and City Health Officials 2005 Profile Study. We used chi-squared and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to examine differences between rural, suburban, and urban LHDs. We used regression-based mediation methods to test whether partnerships mediated the relationship between resources and service provision. FINDINGS: We found significant differences between LHDs. Urban LHDs serve larger jurisdictions, have larger budgets and more staff, cultivate more partnerships with local NGOs, and provide more health services than suburban or rural LHDs. We found that partnerships were a partial mediator between resources and service provision. In playing a mediating role, partnerships reduce differences in service provision between rural, suburban, and urban LHDs. CONCLUSIONS: Partnerships mediate the relationship between resources and service provision in LHDs. LHDs could place more emphasis on cultivating relationships with local NGOs in order to increase service provision. This strategy may be especially useful for rural LHDs facing limited resources and numerous health disparities.

How do Australian metropolitan and rural pharmacists counsel consumers with prescriptions?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare counselling provided by community pharmacists in Australian metropolitan and rural pharmacies. METHODS: Mail surveys to 650 randomly selected New South Wales (NSW) community pharmacies [385 (59%) metropolitan, 265 (41%)] rural were conducted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rates of verbal and written prescription medicine information and type of information given both for new and regular medicines were determined. The rates of verbal information were also explored by assessing how likely pharmacists were to counsel based on hypothetical cases for new prescription medicines. RESULTS: A response-rate of 42% was obtained from 116/378 (31%) metropolitan and 156/262 (60%) rural pharmacies. A higher proportion of metropolitan than rural pharmacists reported providing verbal information for more than 50% of new prescriptions (P < 0.001) and for more than 50% of regular prescriptions (P < 0.001). In contrast, a higher proportion of rural than metropolitan pharmacists reported giving out Consumer Medicine Information leaflets (CMIs) for more than 50% of new prescriptions (P = 0.007). After controlling for any identified confounders, metropolitan pharmacists were 4.6 times more likely to verbally counsel on new prescriptions and 3.1 times more likely to counsel on regular prescriptions, while rural pharmacists were 2.4 times more likely to give out CMIs for new prescriptions. Information on medicine administration was provided more frequently than information on the safety aspects of medicine, with both types of information being more frequently given for new than regular prescription medicines. There was variability in responses to hypothetical cases and not all respondents were highly likely to counsel on all new prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Metropolitan pharmacists tended to provide verbal information, while rural pharmacists tended to give out written information. The respondents prioritised counselling on medicine administration for new prescription medicines. Not all respondents, however, were highly likely to counsel on all new prescriptions.

Alternative models for academic family practices.

BACKGROUND: The Future of Family Medicine Report calls for a fundamental redesign of the American family physician workplace. At the same time, academic family practices are under economic pressure. Most family medicine departments do not have self-supporting practices, but seek support from specialty colleagues or hospital practice plans. Alternative models for academic family practices that are economically viable and consistent with the principles of family medicine are needed. This article presents several "experiments" to address these challenges. METHODS: The basis of comparison is a traditional academic family medicine center. Apart of the faculty practice plan, our center consistently operated at a deficit despite high productivity. A number of different practice types and alternative models of service delivery were therefore developed and tested. They ranged from a multi-specialty office arrangement, to a community clinic operated as part of a federally-qualified health center, to a team of providers based in and providing care for residents of an elderly public housing project. Financial comparisons using consistent accounting across models are provided. RESULTS: Academic family practices can, at least in some settings, operate without subsidy while providing continuity of care to a broad segment of the community. The prerequisites are that the clinicians must see patients efficiently, and be able to bill appropriately for their payer mix. CONCLUSION: Experimenting within academic practice structure and organization is worthwhile, and can result in economically viable alternatives to traditional models.

Telemedicine and neurosciences in developing countries.

It is a universally accepted fact that the number of neurosurgeons in developing countries is woefully inadequate. It is also unrealistic to expect this limited number to work in professional isolation, in suburban and rural areas, without adequate infrastructure. Therefore, this has resulted in concentration of neurosurgeons in developing countries, in metropolitan areas, even at the risk of being underemployed. The phenomenal advances in communications and information technology in India are resulting in a new look at how secondary and tertiary health care can be provided to the underprivileged masses. Following a proof of concept validation ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization) in conjunction with the Apollo Hospitals, is ready to use satellite technology to provide specialist care not only to suburban and rural India but to other countries as well, by using the large number of highly qualified and trained specialists in urban India. The implications of these developments for the delivery of neurosurgical care to suburban and rural India is briefly reviewed.

Factors that promote success in home palliative care: a study of a large suburban palliative care practice.

It has been repeatedly shown that most people would prefer to die in their own homes. However, many factors affect the feasibility of this choice. This study retrospectively examined the medical and nursing charts of 402 cancer patients who wished to die at home and had been referred to a palliative care service. Of those reviewed, 223 (55%) died at home, while 179 died in hospitals. The presence of more than one caregiver, an increased length of time between diagnosis and referral to a palliative care physician, an increased length of time under that physician's care, older age at referral, home ownership, and race were all significantly associated with home death, as were certain cancer diagnoses. The most compelling of these predictive factors have formed the basis for an evaluation tool, soon to be validated, to help palliative health professionals assess the viability of home-based palliative care culminating in a home death.