Antirheumatic drugs and the risk of tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to quantify the rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease (TB) among a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess whether the independent use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is associated with the risk of developing TB. METHODS: The study was performed using the PharMetrics Patient-Centric database (PharMetrics). The cohort consisted of all subjects with > or =1 occurrence of a diagnosis of RA during an inpatient or outpatient visit during the period of September 1998 through December 2003. Conditional logistic regression was used in a nested case-control analysis to estimate the rate ratio (RR) of TB with any use of biological or traditional DMARDs during the year before the index date. We also assessed the interaction between DMARDs and the current use of corticosteroids. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 112,300 patients with RA. A total of 386 cases of TB were identified, which resulted in an overall rate of 2.19 cases per 1000 person-years. The adjusted RR of TB for biological DMARD use is 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-1.9). Use of traditional DMARDs was also independently associated with TB (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5). RRs of developing TB disease with the use of biological or traditional DMARD were lower among current users of corticosteroids than among noncurrent users of corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: We found that the use of biological and traditional DMARDs is associated with an increased risk of developing TB in patients with RA, mainly among noncurrent users of corticosteroids.

Neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease responsive to interleukin-1beta inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease is characterized by fever, urticarial rash, aseptic meningitis, deforming arthropathy, hearing loss, and mental retardation. Many patients have mutations in the cold-induced autoinflammatory syndrome 1 (CIAS1) gene, encoding cryopyrin, a protein that regulates inflammation. METHODS: We selected 18 patients with neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (12 with identifiable CIAS1 mutations) to receive anakinra, an interleukin-1-receptor antagonist (1 to 2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day subcutaneously). In 11 patients, anakinra was withdrawn at three months until a flare occurred. The primary end points included changes in scores in a daily diary of symptoms, serum levels of amyloid A and C-reactive protein, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate from baseline to month 3 and from month 3 until a disease flare. RESULTS: All 18 patients had a rapid response to anakinra, with disappearance of rash. Diary scores improved (P<0.001) and serum amyloid A (from a median of 174 mg to 8 mg per liter), C-reactive protein (from a median of 5.29 mg to 0.34 mg per deciliter), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreased at month 3 (all P<0.001), and remained low at month 6. Magnetic resonance imaging showed improvement in cochlear and leptomeningeal lesions as compared with baseline. Withdrawal of anakinra uniformly resulted in relapse within days; retreatment led to rapid improvement. There were no drug-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Daily injections of anakinra markedly improved clinical and laboratory manifestations in patients with neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease, with or without CIAS1 mutations. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00069329 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Safety of extended treatment with anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety profile of anakinra after extended exposure in a diverse clinical trial population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: A six month, randomised, double blind phase comparing anakinra (100 mg/day) with placebo was followed by open label anakinra treatment for up to three years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Concomitant non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and other disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were permitted. RESULTS: In all 1346 patients with rheumatoid arthritis received anakinra for up to three years. Patients had varying levels of disease severity, concomitant drug use, and comorbid conditions. Cumulative, exposure adjusted event (EAE) rates for all adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and deaths were similar during each year of anakinra treatment; the overall rate (0 to 3 years) was similar to that observed for controls during the blinded phase. The most frequent AEs were injection site reactions (122.26 events/100 patient-years), rheumatoid arthritis progression (67.80 events/100 patient-years), and upper respiratory infections (26.09 events/100 patient-years). The EAE rate of serious infections was higher for patients treated with anakinra for 0 to 3 years (5.37 events/100 patient-years) than for controls during the blinded phase (1.65 events/100 patient-years). However, if the patient was not receiving corticosteroid treatment at baseline, the serious infection rate was substantially lower (2.87 event/100 patient-years). The overall incidence of malignancies was consistent with expected rates reported by SEER. Neutralising antibodies developed in 25 patients, but appeared to be transient in 12; neutralising antibody status did not appear related to occurrence of malignancies or serious infections. There were no clinically significant trends in laboratory data related to anakinra. CONCLUSION: Anakinra is safe and well tolerated for up to three years of continuous use in a diverse population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Observational study on efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin 1 (IL1) receptor antagonist used in rheumatoid arthritis, has been documented in five randomised controlled studies. However, long term post-marketing efficacy data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anakinra in clinical practice. METHODS: All patients with rheumatoid arthritis who started anakinra in six hospitals between May 2002 and February 2004 were included in a two year prospective, in part retrospective, cohort study. Efficacy was assessed using the 28 joint disease activity score (DAS28) and the EULAR response criteria. Safety was evaluated using the common toxicity criteria. Drug survival and prognostic factors were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: After three months, 55% of the patients (n = 146) showed a response (43% moderate, 12% good). A subset of patients continuing anakinra after 18 months had a sustained clinical response compared with patients who switched to other disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (DAS28 improvement, 2.46 v 1.79). Drug survival was 78%, 54%, and 14% after three, six, and 24 months, respectively. The reason for discontinuation was lack of efficacy in 78% and adverse events in 22%. Except for higher drug survival in women (odds ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.97), no prognostic factors were found. Adverse events were reported 206 times in 111 patients, the most common being injection site reactions (36%). Serious adverse events occurred in 12% of the patients, with one classified as related. CONCLUSIONS: The short term efficacy and safety profile of anakinra are comparable to those found in randomised clinical studies. However, the drug survival of anakinra after two years is low, mostly because of lack of efficacy.

Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence rates of serious and nonserious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who start treatment with a biologic agent, and to compare these rates with those in patients with RA who receive conventional treatment. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included. Treating rheumatologists assessed adverse events and serious adverse events. All adverse events and serious adverse events experienced within 12 months after study entry were analyzed. Propensity score methods were applied to estimate which part of a rate increase was likely to be attributable to differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS: Data were available for 512 patients receiving etanercept, 346 patients receiving infliximab, 70 patients receiving anakinra, and 601 control patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The total number of adverse events per 100 patient-years was 22.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 18.7-27.2) among patients receiving etanercept, 28.3 (95% CI 23.1-34.7) among patients receiving infliximab, and 6.8 (95% CI 5.0-9.4) among controls (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in the rate of serious adverse events were also observed. For patients receiving etanercept, those receiving infliximab, and controls, the total numbers of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years were 6.4 (95% CI 4.5-9.1), 6.2 (95% CI 4.0-9.5), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-3.9), respectively (P = 0.0016). After adjusting for differences in the case patient mix, the relative risks of serious adverse events were 2.2 (95% CI 0.9-5.4) for patients receiving etanercept and 2.1 (95% CI 0.8-5.5) for patients receiving infliximab, compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with biologic agents have a higher a priori risk of infection. However, our data suggest that this risk is increased by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Adverse cutaneous reactions to anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: clinicopathological study of five patients.

BACKGROUND: Anakinra, a recombinant human form of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, is used to treat patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVES: To report five patients with cutaneous adverse drug reactions due to anakinra and to evaluate the histopathological and immunohistochemical findings with the aim of understanding the possible mechanisms involved. METHODS: Five patients of a series of 10 patients with RA undergoing treatment with anakinra in a clinical trial presented inflammatory lesions at the anakinra injection sites. In each case, clinical features were recorded and skin biopsy specimens were obtained. In one patient sequential biopsy specimens were obtained from skin lesions at different stages of development. Tissue sections of the biopsy specimens were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and May-Grünwald-Giemsa, and were immunoreacted with antibodies to leucocyte common antigen, CD68, CD3, CD45RO, CD20 and CD45RA. RESULTS: The onset of reaction was within the first month of treatment and appeared as well-defined erythema and oedema involving the injection sites. In two patients the treatment had to be discontinued because of the skin reaction, and in one patient it was associated with systemic involvement. All biopsy specimens exhibited marked dermal oedema and a lichenoid dermal infiltrate composed mainly of lymphomononuclear cells with prominent populations of eosinophils and large CD68+ dermal macrophages and an increase in the number of mast cells, which were spindle shaped in a significant proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous toxicity is a frequent, usually well-tolerated complication of treatment with anakinra in patients with RA, although in some cases it can be associated with systemic involvement. The most relevant histopathological findings include dermal oedema and a lichenoid, perivascular and periadnexal predominantly lymphomononuclear infiltrate, with many eosinophils and the presence of enlarged CD68+ macrophages. These findings resemble those seen in skin reactions in patients receiving chemotherapy and colony-stimulating factors. We also found an increase in mast cell numbers that could be a specific effect of anakinra.

Safety study of intraarticular injection of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Interleukin 1 (IL-1) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). In animal models of OA, IL-1 blockade by IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) can slow the progression of disease. We examined the safety of intraarticular (IA) injections of recombinant human IL-1Ra in patients with knee OA. METHODS: A prospective multicenter trial was conducted using the continual reassessment method. Six doses were considered, 0.05 mg up to 150 mg IL-1Ra, and the trial was double-blind regarding the dose administered. Patients with symptomatic knee OA and without synovial fluid effusion were included. Acute inflammatory reaction (the primary endpoint defining intolerance) was recorded if pain increase over 30 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale and synovial fluid effusion occurred within 72 h after the IA injection. As a secondary aim, efficacy was estimated (by total pain and Western Ontario and McMaster University OA functional index) until Month 3. RESULTS: One patient received 0.05 mg and 13 patients received 150 mg of IL-1Ra. No acute reaction occurred (one patient experienced postinjection joint swelling with no pain) and the 150 mg dose was considered the maximum tolerated dose (intolerance level 0%; confidence interval 0, 9.1%). A significant improvement was still observed until Month 3 in the 13 patients who received 150 mg IL-1Ra: pain improved by -20.4 +/- 23.3 mm (p = 0.008) and WOMAC global score by -19.5 +/- 20.1 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: IA injection of IL-1Ra in patients with knee OA was well tolerated and did not induce any acute inflammatory reaction. The feasibility of such IA injections of IL-1Ra opens a promising therapeutic perspective for patients with OA.

Anakinra: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Anakinra (Kineret) is the first biologic drug that has been developed specifically as an interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist (Ra) and is derived from an endogenous IL-1Ra. The drug blocks the activity of IL-1 in synovial joints, reducing the inflammatory and joint destructive processes associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In randomized, placebo-controlled trials of up to 52 weeks' duration, anakinra has shown efficacy both as monotherapy and in combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with RA. It is subcutaneously administered and is generally well tolerated. Anakinra offers a useful addition to the range of drugs available for the treatment of RA.

Safety of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-1 blocking agents in rheumatic diseases.

The three licensed TNF(alpha) blocking agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab) and the recombinant form of human interleukin-1-receptor antagonist (anakinra) have all been shown to be effective in patients with chronic rheumatic autoimmune diseases; they have also been associated with certain types of serious adverse events. As expected, much of the information on serious events have accumulated during the post-marketing period. Certain serious, but uncommon, adverse events have been observed with all three TNF(alpha) blocking agents, including serious bacterial infections, tuberculosis (TB) and certain opportunistic infections, demyelinating syndromes, and lupus-like reactions. These data suggest that these adverse reactions may be related to blockade of TNF(alpha) and may therefore represent class effects of these agents. However, the severity and degree of risk may not be the same with all three agents. Blockade of interleukin-1 activity with anakinra appears, at present, to be relatively safe. The safety profile of these products will continue to be developed through the use of the registry, periodic safety updates from the passive surveillance program, and safety data from controlled trials of biological therapy for other diseases. Physicians should minimize risks by patient selection and screening for opportunistic infections. Moreover, the choice of the biological agent must be tailored to minimize risks and maximize benefits.

Open label trial of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis over 24 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the therapeutic effect of the interleukin 1 (IL1) receptor antagonist anakinra in ankylosing spondylitis in an open label trial. METHODS: Anakinra (100 mg) was given subcutaneously daily over 24 weeks to 20 NSAID refractory patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Thirteen completed the study. Clinical outcome assessments included disease activity, function, metrology, patients' and physicians' global assessment, peripheral joint assessment, quality of life, and C reactive protein. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints or spine, using gadolinium DTPA as contrast agent, was done before treatment in 15/20 patients, and in 10 patients at study end. The primary end point was the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) and ASAS (assessments in ankylosing spondylitis) short term response after six months. RESULTS: Using an intention to treat analysis, an ASAS 20% response (ASAS 20) was achieved in five patients, ASAS 40 in four, and ASAS 70 in two after 24 weeks. There was no change in mean C reactive protein (22.3 v 33.1 mg/l) or in MRI score. The drug was well tolerated. Injection site reaction was the commonest adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: In this open study, anakinra improved spinal symptoms in only a small subgroup of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.

[Increased risk of infection with biological immunomodifying antirheumatic agents. Clear guidelines are necessary as shown by case reports]. / Okad risk för infektion med biologiska immunmodifierande antireumatika.

Several potent immunosuppressive drugs have become available in the new millennium for patients with rheumatologic diseases, Crohn's disease and other autoimmune disorders. Five patient cases from Växjö central hospital (uptake area 178 000 individuals) with Listeria meningitis, Pneumocystis jiroveci and tuberculosis pneumonia, Listeria sepsis, Legionella pneumonia and E coli sepsis are described. A doubled risk for infections has previously been observed for RA patients, as compared to healthy individuals. There is clearly an increased risk of tuberculosis (depending on the actual and historic environmental prevalence) for patients on TNF antagonists, and therefore tuberculosis screening is now mandatory before start of therapy. Since TNF has a central role in the immune defence, an increased risk of opportunistic infections like listeriosis. mycobacteriosis, and invasive fungal infections has been established. Eight hospitals in southern Sweden participate in a register for the use of TNF blockers in rheumatologic diseases (South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group, SSATG). Guidelines for screening and treatment of latent and active tuberculosis, possible prophylactic antibiotic treatment for endocarditis and vaccination programs for patients on TNF antagonists are discussed.

Preliminary results of safety and efficacy of the interleukin 1 receptor antagonist anakinra in patients with severe lupus arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Joint involvement occurs in most patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and severe lupus arthritis is often refractory to conventional treatments. Anakinra is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but its therapeutic potential has not been proved in patients with SLE. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety/tolerability and efficacy of anakinra in patients with SLE with leading joint involvement. METHODS: In patients with SLE with active polyarthritis and no other uncontrolled systemic/organ manifestations, 100 mg/day anakinra was self administered subcutaneously for 3 months. Disease activity was assessed by VAS, number of swollen/tender joints, ECLAM score, and serological and immunological measures. RESULTS: Four patients with SLE were studied; anakinra was safe in all four patients and no drug related serious adverse events occurred. A subjective benefit was seen in all patients and a trend towards better activity measures after 4 weeks. After an initial response, one patient left the study because of an arthritic flare after 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: In this study anakinra was apparently safe and well tolerated and led to clinical and serological improvement. Anakinra might be an interesting alternative in individual patients with lupus arthritis not responding to conventional treatments.

Overview of benefit/risk of biological agents.

Targeted tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists, first approved by the FDA in 1998, have had a significant impact on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In general, the benefit/ risk ratio for these agents and the IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, has been quite favorable. However, infrequent adverse events can be serious and require continued pharmacovigilance. Infections, particularly tuberculosis and less commonly fungal infections, are among the most serious adverse events, especially given delays in diagnosis due to subtle or atypical presentations. Questions have also arisen regarding whether anti-TNF-alpha agents increase the risk of lymphoma, a complicated issue confounded by the multiple risk factors for lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low observed incidence rates of lymphoma, requiring prolonged monitoring. Additional rare reported complications include systemic lupus erythematosus-like syndromes, congestive heart failure and demyelinating syndromes (including cases resembling progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy). Ongoing post-marketing surveillance of these and other serious adverse events is necessary to determine the true incidence rates, and whether a reassessment of the overall risk-benefit of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists will be required.

Serious infections associated with anticytokine therapies in the rheumatic diseases.

The ability to target and neutralize macrophage-derived inflammatory cytokines, particularly tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), has emerged in recent years as one of the most important advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and several other systemic inflammatory diseases. In rheumatoid arthritis, for example, these biological agents rapidly reduce signs and symptoms of joint inflammation and profoundly slow the progression of joint damage. However, data that have emerged following Food and Drug Administration approval of these agents have alerted clinicians to an increased likelihood of opportunistic infections in patients treated with these agents, particularly tuberculosis. The effect of TNF inhibition on the frequency of infection with more common bacterial pathogens is less clear. Animal models of tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections have demonstrated the importance of TNF-alpha in controlling and containing intracellular pathogens. The spectrum of infections reported to date in the setting of anti-TNF-alpha treatment is reviewed here. In addition, relevant animal data illustrating potential mechanistic roles for TNF-alpha in host responses to infection are also reviewed.

Durability and rapidity of response to anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory disease that ultimately leads to disability and functional decline. Because patients usually develop RA in mid-life, they may experience its consequences for 20-30 years or longer. Proinflammatory cytokines, notably interleukin (IL)-1 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha, are believed to play significant pathophysiological roles. Clinical trials of biologicals that block these cytokines confirm their importance.Anakinra, a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, improves clinical signs and symptoms, and slows radiographic progression in patients with active RA. In clinical trials, patients receiving anakinra doses >1 mg/kg, whether administered alone or in combination with methotrexate, were two to three times more likely than patients receiving placebo to achieve a sustained ACR20 (American College of Rheumatology criteria) response. Notably, bone erosion slows to a greater extent and shows accelerated benefit when anakinra treatment is continued for periods beyond 24 weeks. Anakinra has a rapid onset of action, with substantial improvements in biochemical indices (C-reactive protein) seen within 1 week and clinical responses (ACR20 or joint counts) seen within 4 weeks of starting treatment. Anakinra is generally well tolerated, with injection site reactions being the most common adverse event. These reactions are generally mild and typically resolve within 2-3 weeks of treatment. The anakinra product labelling does include a warning regarding an increased risk of infections of 2% in anakinra-treated patients versus <1% in patients receiving placebo.