Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is the primary cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the strategy for VT treatment in HCM patients remains unclear. This study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy for sustained VT in patients with HCM. METHODS: A total of 28 HCM patients with sustained VT at 4 different centers between December 2012 and December 2021 were enrolled. Twelve underwent catheter ablation (ablation group) and sixteen received AAD therapy (AAD group). The primary outcome was VT recurrence during follow-up. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups. After a mean follow-up of 31.4 ± 17.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 35.7% of the ablation group and 90.6% of the AAD group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29 [95%CI, 0.10-0.89]; P = 0.021). No differences in hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause (25.0% vs. 71.0%; P = 0.138) and cardiovascular cause-related mortality/heart transplantation (9.1% vs. 50.6%; P = 0.551) were observed. However, there was a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of VT recurrence, hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause, cardiovascular cause-related mortality, or heart transplantation in ablation group as compared to that of AAD group (42.9% vs. 93.7%; HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.95]; P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: In HCM patients with sustained VT, catheter ablation reduced the VT recurrence, and the composite endpoint of VT recurrence, hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause, cardiovascular cause-related mortality, or heart transplantation as compared to AAD.

Pediatric and Familial Genetic Arrhythmia Syndromes: Evaluation of Bidirectional Ventricular Tachycardia-Differential Diagnosis.

Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia is a unique arrhythmia that can herald lethal arrhythmia syndromes. Using cases based on real patient stories, this article examines 3 different presentations to help clinicians learn the differential diagnosis associated with this condition. Each associated genetic disorder will be briefly discussed, and valuable tips for distinguishing them from each other will be provided.

Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from the left ventricular summit (LVS) is challenging because of the anatomic barriers. On the other hand, RFCA at the endocardial sites near the earliest epicardial activation site of LVS-VAs (anatomic approach) has proven successful. The evolving trends in the approaches and outcomes of RFCA of LVS-VAs at a single center were evaluated. METHODS: We studied 88 consecutive patients with idiopathic LVS-VAs at our institute from 2009 to 2019. These patients were divided into 3 periods: 2009 to 2012 (early), 2013 to 2015 (middle), and 2016 to 2019 (recent). The data were compared among the 3 periods. RESULTS: The RFCA success rate did not significantly change from the early to middle period but significantly increased from the middle to recent period (P=0.0315). The transpericardial approach usage significantly decreased over the 3 periods. The anatomic approach usage significantly increased over the 3 periods. The use of the transpericardial approach did not affect the RFCA outcomes over the 3 periods. The success rate of the anatomic RFCA tended to increase from the early to middle period and significantly increased from the middle to recent period (P=0.0412). The number of endocardial locations where RFCA was successful increased over the 3 periods. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 10-year period, the transpericardial approach became decreasingly performed, whereas the anatomic approach became increasingly performed with a satisfactory improvement in the RFCA outcomes of LVS-VAs. The anatomic RFCA became more successful by identifying more and various endocardial locations as target sites.

Antiarrhythmic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Post-Myocardial Infarction Scar.

BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is superior to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in reducing the risk of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death, but its mechanistic data on myocardial scar after myocardial infarction (MI) are lacking. The objective of this work was to assess the effects of Sac/Val on inflammation, fibrosis, electrophysiological properties, and ventricular tachycardia inducibility in post-MI scar remodeling in swine. METHODS: After MI, 22 pigs were randomized to receive ß-blocker (BB; control, n=8) or BB+Sac/Val (Sac/Val, n=9). The systemic immune response was monitored. Cardiac magnetic resonance data were acquired at 2-day and 29-day post MI to assess ventricular remodeling. Programmed electrical stimulation and high-density mapping were performed at 30-day post MI to assess ventricular tachycardia inducibility. Myocardial samples were collected for histological analysis. RESULTS: Compared with BB, BB+Sac/Val reduced acute circulating leukocytes (P=0.009) and interleukin-12 levels (P=0.024) at 2-day post MI, decreased C-C chemokine receptor type 2 expression in monocytes (P=0.047) at 15-day post MI, and reduced scar mass (P=0.046) and border zone mass (P=0.043). It also lowered the number and mass of border zone corridors (P=0.009 and P=0.026, respectively), scar collagen I content (P=0.049), and collagen I/III ratio (P=0.040). Sac/Val reduced ventricular tachycardia inducibility (P=0.034) and the number of deceleration zones (P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: After MI, compared with BB, BB+Sac/Val was associated with reduced acute systemic inflammatory markers, reduced total scar and border zone mass on late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and lower ventricular tachycardia inducibility.

Electromechanical Window and Spontaneous Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Takotsubo Syndrome.

QT interval prolongation is common in patients hospitalized with Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), however, only a minority experience ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Our aim was to characterize the electromechanical window (EMW) in patients with TTS and to evaluate its association with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. We preformed aretrospective analysis of 84 patients hospitalized with TTS in the Tel-Aviv Medical Center between 2013 and 2022. All patients underwent a comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation and the EMW was calculated by subtracting the QT interval from the QRS onset to the aortic valve closure obtained from a continuous-wave Doppler for the same beat. Of the 84 patients with TTS, 74 (88%) were female and the mean age was 70 ± 11 years. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 42 ± 8%. The EMW was negative in 81 patients (96%), and the mean EMW was -69 ± 50 ms. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 7 patients (8%). The EMW of patients who experienced ventricular tachyarrhythmias was more negative than patients who did not (-133 ± 23 ms vs -63 ± 48 ms, p = 0.001). In the univariate analysis, EMW and QT were associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (univariate odds ratio [OR]EMW 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.05, p = 0.003 and univariate ORQTc 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03, p = 0.02); however, only EMW remained significant in the multivariate analysis (OREMW 1.03 95% CI 1.03 to 1.05, p = 0.023). EMW was more effective than corrected QT interval in identifying patients who had ventricular tachyarrhythmias (AUCEMW: 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97 vs AUCQTc 0.77, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93, p = 0.02), and a cut-off value of -108 ms was predictive of ventricular tachyarrhythmias with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 79%. In conclusion, EMW is negative in patients with TTS and is associated with increased risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The role of EMW in the risk stratification of patients with TTS warrants further investigation.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation and its implications for modern cardiac electrophysiology: results of an EHRA survey.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a treatment option for recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The current and future role of STAR as viewed by cardiologists is unknown. The study aimed to assess the current role, barriers to application, and expected future role of STAR. An online survey consisting of 20 questions on baseline demographics, awareness/access, current use, and the future role of STAR was conducted. A total of 129 international participants completed the survey [mean age 43 ± 11 years, 25 (16.4%) female]. Ninety-one (59.9%) participants were electrophysiologists. Nine participants (7%) were unaware of STAR as a therapeutic option. Sixty-four (49.6%) had access to STAR, while 62 (48.1%) had treated/referred a patient for treatment. Common primary indications for STAR were recurrent VT/VF in SHD (45%), recurrent VT/VF without SHD (7.8%), or premature ventricular contraction (3.9%). Reported main advantages of STAR were efficacy in the treatment of arrhythmias not amenable to conventional treatment (49%) and non-invasive treatment approach with overall low expected acute and short-term procedural risk (23%). Most respondents have foreseen a future clinical role of STAR in the treatment of VT/VF with or without underlying SHD (72% and 75%, respectively), although only a minority expected a first-line indication for it (7% and 5%, respectively). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation as a novel treatment option of recurrent VT appears to gain acceptance within the cardiology community. Further trials are critical to further define efficacy, patient populations, as well as the appropriate clinical use for the treatment of VT.

Intramural needle ablation or repeated standard ablation in patients referred for repeat ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: When ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurs after standard RF ablation (sRFA) some patients benefit from repeat sRFA, whereas others warrant advanced methods such as intramural needle ablation (INA). Our objectives are to assess the utility of repeat sRFA and to clarify the benefit of INA when repeat sRFA fails in patients with VT due to structural heart disease. METHODS: In consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled in a study for INA for recurrent sustained monomorphic VT despite sRFA, repeat sRFA was considered first. INA was performed during the same procedure if repeat sRFA failed or no targets for sRFA were identified. RESULTS: Of 85 patients enrolled, acute success with repeat sRFA was achieved in 30 patients (35%), and during the 6-month follow-up, 87% (20/23) were free of VT hospitalization, 78% were free of any VT, and 7 were lost to follow-up. INA was performed in 55 patients (65%) after sRFA failed, or no endocardial targets were found abolished or modified inducible VT in 35/55 patients (64%). During follow-up, 72% (39/54) were free of VT hospitalization, 41% were free of any VT, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Overall, 59 out of 77 (77%) patients were free of hospitalization and 52% were free of any VT. Septal-origin VTs were more likely to need INA, whereas RV and papillary muscle VTs were less likely to require INA. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat sRFA was beneficial in 23% (18/77) of patients with recurrent sustained VT who were referred for INA. The availability of INA increased favorable outcomes to 52%.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease: What Is Known and New Perspectives.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: This review aims to evaluate current evidence regarding ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease and explore novel approaches currently developing to improve procedural and long-term outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published trials (PARTITA, PAUSE-SCD, and SURVIVE-VT) have demonstrated the prognostic benefit of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to current clinical practice. Advanced cardiac imaging provides a valuable pre-procedural evaluation of the arrhythmogenic substrate, identifying ablation targets non-invasively. Advanced cardiac mapping techniques allow to better characterize arrhythmogenic substrate during ablation procedure. Emerging technologies like pulsed field ablation and ultra-low temperature cryoablation show promise in ventricular tachycardia ablation. Advancements in mapping techniques, ablation technologies, and pre-procedural cardiac imaging offer promise for improving ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes in ischemic heart disease.

Pulsed field ablation: A promising approach for ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been a central therapeutic strategy for ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, concerns about its long-term effectiveness and complications have arisen. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), characterized by its nonthermal, highly tissue-selective ablation technique, has emerged as a promising alternative. This comprehensive review delves into the potential advantages and opportunities presented by PFA in the realm of VT, drawing insights from both animal experimentation and clinical case studies. PFA shows promise in generating superior lesions within scarred myocardial tissue, and its inherent repetition dependency holds the potential to enhance therapeutic outcomes. Clinical cases underscore the promise of PFA for VT ablation. Despite its promising applications, challenges such as catheter maneuverability and proarrhythmic effects require further investigation. Large-scale, long-term studies are essential to establish the suitability of PFA for VT treatment.

Role of arrhythmic phenotype in prognostic stratification and management of dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with arrhythmic phenotype combines phenotypical aspects of DCM and predisposition to ventricular arrhythmias, typical of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The definition of DCM with arrhythmic phenotype is not universally accepted, leading to uncertainty in the identification of high-risk patients. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of arrhythmic phenotype in risk stratification and the correlation of arrhythmic markers with high-risk arrhythmogenic gene variants in DCM patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre study, DCM patients with available genetic testing were analysed. The following arrhythmic markers, present at baseline or within 1 year of enrolment, were tested: unexplained syncope, rapid non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ≥1000 premature ventricular contractions/24 h or ≥50 ventricular couplets/24 h. LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, and desmosomal pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants were considered high-risk arrhythmogenic genes. The study endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death and major ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVA). We studied 742 DCM patients (45 ± 14 years, 34% female, 410 [55%] with left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <35%). During a median follow-up of 6 years (interquartile range 1.6-12.1), unexplained syncope and NSVT were the only arrhythmic markers associated with SCD/MVA, and the combination of the two markers carried a significant additive risk of SCD/MVA, incremental to LVEF and New York Heart Association class. The probability of identifying an arrhythmogenic genotype rose from 8% to 30% if both early syncope and NSVT were present. CONCLUSION: In DCM patients, the combination of early detected NSVT and unexplained syncope increases the risk of life-threatening arrhythmic outcomes and can aid the identification of carriers of malignant arrhythmogenic genotypes.

Relevance of mexiletine in the era of evolving antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular arrhythmias.

Despite impressive developments in the field of ventricular arrhythmias, there is still a relevant number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who require antiarrhythmic drug therapy and may, e.g., in otherwise drug and/or ablation refractory situations, benefit from agents known for decades, such as mexiletine. Through its capability of blocking fast sodium channels in cardiomyocytes, it has played a minor to moderate antiarrhythmic role throughout the recent decades. Nevertheless, certain patients with structural heart disease suffering from drug-refractory, i.e., mainly amiodarone refractory ventricular arrhythmias, as well as those with selected forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) may nowadays still benefit from mexiletine. Here, we outline mexiletine's cellular and clinical electrophysiological properties. In addition, the application of mexiletine may be accompanied by various potential side effects, e.g., nausea and tremor, and is limited by several drug-drug interactions. Thus, we shed light on the current therapeutic role of mexiletine for therapy of ventricular arrhythmias and discuss clinically relevant aspects of its indications based on current evidence.

Cardiac monoamine oxidase-A inhibition protects against catecholamine-induced ventricular arrhythmias via enhanced diastolic calcium control.

AIMS: A mechanistic link between depression and risk of arrhythmias could be attributed to altered catecholamine metabolism in the heart. Monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A), a key enzyme involved in catecholamine metabolism and longstanding antidepressant target, is highly expressed in the myocardium. The present study aimed to elucidate the functional significance and underlying mechanisms of cardiac MAO-A in arrhythmogenesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analysis of the TriNetX database revealed that depressed patients treated with MAO inhibitors had a lower risk of arrhythmias compared with those treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. This effect was phenocopied in mice with cardiomyocyte-specific MAO-A deficiency (cMAO-Adef), which showed a significant reduction in both incidence and duration of catecholamine stress-induced ventricular tachycardia compared with wild-type mice. Additionally, cMAO-Adef cardiomyocytes exhibited altered Ca2+ handling under catecholamine stimulation, with increased diastolic Ca2+ reuptake, reduced diastolic Ca2+ leak, and diminished systolic Ca2+ release. Mechanistically, cMAO-Adef hearts had reduced catecholamine levels under sympathetic stress, along with reduced levels of reactive oxygen species and protein carbonylation, leading to decreased oxidation of Type II PKA and CaMKII. These changes potentiated phospholamban (PLB) phosphorylation, thereby enhancing diastolic Ca2+ reuptake, while reducing ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2) phosphorylation to decrease diastolic Ca2+ leak. Consequently, cMAO-Adef hearts exhibited lower diastolic Ca2+ levels and fewer arrhythmogenic Ca2+ waves during sympathetic overstimulation. CONCLUSION: Cardiac MAO-A inhibition exerts an anti-arrhythmic effect by enhancing diastolic Ca2+ handling under catecholamine stress.

Characterization of conduction system activation in the postinfarct ventricle using ripple mapping.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) mapping of the ventricular conduction system is challenging. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use ripple mapping to distinguish conduction system activation to that of adjacent myocardium in order to characterize the conduction system in the postinfarct left ventricle (LV). METHODS: High-density mapping (PentaRay, CARTO) was performed during normal rhythm in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation. Ripple maps were viewed from the end of the P wave to QRS onset in 1-ms increments. Clusters of >3 ripple bars were interrogated for the presence of Purkinje potentials, which were tagged on the 3D geometry. Repeating this process allowed conduction system delineation. RESULTS: Maps were reviewed in 24 patients (mean 3112 ± 613 points). There were 150.9 ± 24.5 Purkinje potentials per map, at the left posterior fascicle (LPF) in 22 patients (92%) and at the left anterior fascicle (LAF) in 15 patients (63%). The LAF was shorter (41.4 vs 68.8 mm; P = .0005) and activated for a shorter duration (40.6 vs 64.9 ms; P = .002) than the LPF. Fourteen of 24 patients had left bundle branch block (LBBB), with 11 of 14 (78%) having Purkinje potential-associated breakout. There were fewer breakouts from the conduction system during LBBB (1.8 vs 3.4; 1.6 ± 0.6; P = .039) and an inverse correlation between breakout sites and QRS duration (P = .0035). CONCLUSION: We applied ripple mapping to present a detailed electroanatomic characterization of the conduction system in the postinfarct LV. Patients with broader QRS had fewer LV breakout sites from the conduction system. However, there was 3D mapping evidence of LV breakout from an intact conduction system in the majority of patients with LBBB.