Utility of Percutaneous Ultrasonic Tenotomy for Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Chronic tendinopathy is a challenging problem that can lead to significant disability and limitation in not only athletics but also activities of daily living. While there are many treatment techniques described for this overuse injury, no single modality has been proven superior to all others. With recent advances in medical technology, percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT) for tendinosis has gained traction with promising results. OBJECTIVE: To examine the data published on PUT for treatment of tendinopathy, analyze the outcomes of the procedure, including duration of pain relief and patient-reported outcomes, and assess the rate of complications associated with the procedure. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION: The following combination of keywords was entered into the electronic search engines: ultrasonic tenotomy, ultrasound tenotomy, Tenex, and ultrasonic percutaneous tenotomy. The search results were screened for studies relevant to the topic. Only English-language studies were considered for inclusion. Studies consisting of level 4 evidence or higher and those involving human participants were included for more detailed evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were sorted and reviewed. Type of tendinopathy studied, outcome measures, and complications were recorded. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the data collected. RESULTS: There were a total of 7 studies that met the inclusion criteria and quality measures-5 studies involving the treatment of elbow tendinopathy and 1 study each involving the management of Achilles tendinopathy and plantar fasciitis. PUT resulted in decreased pain/disability scores and improved functional outcome scores for chronic elbow tendinopathy and plantar fasciitis. Results for Achilles tendinopathy showed modest improvement in the short term, but long-term data are lacking. CONCLUSION: PUT is a minimally invasive treatment technique that can be considered in patients with tendinopathy refractory to conservative treatment measures. Further higher quality studies are necessary to accurately assess the comparative effectiveness of this treatment modality.

Injuries and Conditions Affecting the Elbow Flexor/Pronator Tendons.

Common flexor-pronator tendon injuries and medial epicondylitis can be successfully treated nonoperatively in most cases. Operative treatment is reserved for patients with continued symptoms despite adequate nonoperative treatment or in high-level athletes with complete rupture of the common flexor-pronator tendon. The physical examination and workup of patients with flexor-pronator tendon injuries should focus on related or concomitant pathologies of the medial elbow. The gold standard for surgical treatment of flexor-pronator tendon ruptures or medial epicondylitis includes tendon debridement and reattachment.

Ultrasound-guided tenotomy improves physical function and decreases pain for tendinopathies of the elbow: a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Tendinopathy is a common cause of elbow pain in the active population. Ultrasound-guided tenotomy (USGT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for cases recalcitrant to conservative management. Several case studies have shown promising preliminary results of USGT for common extensor tendinopathy and common flexor tendinopathy, but none have included USGT for triceps tendinopathy. This larger retrospective study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of USGT for all elbow tendinopathy sites at short- and long-term follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 131 patients (144 procedures; mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 48.1 ± 9.8 years; mean body mass index ± SD, 32.2 ± 7.7; 59% male) with elbow tendinopathy (104 common extensor tendinopathy, 19 common flexor tendinopathy, 8 triceps tendinopathy) treated with USGT over a 6-year period by a single physician. Pain and quality-of-life measures were collected at baseline. Pain, quality-of-life, satisfaction with outcome, and complications were collected at short-term (2-, 6-, and 12-week) and long-term (median 2.7 years, interquartile range = 2.0-4.0 years) follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, USGT for elbow tendinopathy decreased pain from moderate/severe at baseline to mild/occasional at short- and long-term follow-up (P < .01). Quality-of-life assessments showed significant improvement in physical function at short- and long-term follow-up (P < .01). The majority (70%) of patients were satisfied with the procedure. There was a 0% complication rate. CONCLUSION: Benefits of USGT include pain relief, improved physical function, and high patient satisfaction. USGT is a safe, minimally invasive treatment for refractory elbow tendinopathy.

Clinical outcomes of combined surgical treatment of medial epicondylitis and cubital tunnel syndrome.

Surgical results for treatment of medial epicondylitis and cubital tunnel syndrome are generally satisfactory when performed alone. However, our experience suggests a combined procedure is associated with inferior outcomes. A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive surgical cases of medial epicondylectomy/debridement and ulnar nerve decompression during a single operation at our institution from March 2008 to February 2017 using CPT codes. Thirty combined procedures were identified in 29 patients. Fourteen patients and 15 elbows returned to clinic for evaluation at average 4.3 years after surgery (8 men, 6 women, mean age 45.1 years). A Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analogue pain scale (VAS), and physical examination were performed. The data was stratified by type of ulnar nerve procedure and analyzed. Three of fifteen elbows underwent in situ ulnar nerve decompression, and twelve of 15 had transposition, five subcutaneous and seven submuscular. The mean DASH score for in situ decompression was significantly higher than that of transposition (68.2 vs. 13.1). The average visual pain score for patients whom underwent in situ decompression was significantly higher than that of those with ulnar nerve transposition (8.0 vs. 1.2). All other physical exam measures demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups. In situ ulnar nerve decompression in the setting of medial epicondylectomy/debridement may be associated with inferior clinical outcomes in comparison to ulnar nerve transposition. Further studies are needed to validate the results of our study and inform management.

Snapping at the Lateral Aspect of the Elbow: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

CASE: A 59-year-old man presented with snapping at the lateral aspect of the elbow and associated pain. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated extensor tendinopathy and thickening of the radial collateral ligament. Ultrasonography showed entrapment of a synovial fold in the radiohumeral joint. Initial arthroscopic debridement did not alleviate the snapping. Three months later, the patient underwent open excision of a thickened and partially torn annular ligament; subsequently, all of the symptoms resolved. CONCLUSION: Snapping elbow is a phenomenon that often coincides with pain and limited function. Accurate diagnosis is critical because misdiagnosis has been demonstrated to have serious consequences, including the need for repeat surgery.

Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Anatomical Repair of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Rupture Using Suture Anchor Fixation.

BACKGROUND To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the preferred fixation method to use in the repair of distal biceps brachii tendon rupture. The aim of this study was to clinically and functionally (Mayo Elbow Performance Index, MEPI) assess the upper limb after surgical anatomic reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon with the use of suture anchor fixation method with regard to postoperative time and limb dominance, and to assess postoperative complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS The sample comprised 18 males (age 52.09±8.89 years) after surgical anatomical distal biceps brachii reinsertion using suture anchor fixation. A comprehensive clinical and functional evaluation and pain assessment were performed. RESULTS In terms of postoperative complications, an isolated case of surgical site sensory disturbances was noted. Circumferences (p-value 0.21-1.00) and ROM (p-value 0.07-1.00) were similar in the operated and nonoperated limbs. The isometric torque (IT) values of muscles flexing and supinating the forearm were comparable in both limbs (p-value 0.14-0.95), but in patients with the operated dominant limb, the mean IT value was not higher than the value obtained in the nonoperated nondominant one. The MEPI indicated good and excellent results (80.00±15.00-90.00±8.66 points), but a detailed individual analysis showed that reported scores were not in line with objectively measured features. CONCLUSIONS The results of the comprehensive retrospective evaluation justify the clinical use of suture anchors fixation method in the surgical anatomical reinsertion of a ruptured distal biceps brachii tendon. The assessment of a patient should always report both subjective and objective measures.

Patient-related risk factors for requiring surgical intervention following a failed injection for the treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for failure of a therapeutic injection leading to operative management of both medial and lateral epicondylitis. METHODS: A national database was used to query Medicare Standard Analytic Files from 2005-2012 for patients treated with therapeutic injections for medial or lateral epicondylitis using CPT codes for injections associated with corresponding ICD-9 diagnostic codes (726.31 and 726.32, respectively). Those who subsequently underwent surgical treatment following injection were identified. A multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis was utilized to evaluate patient-related risk factors for requiring surgery within 2 years after therapeutic injection. RESULTS: 1,837 patients received therapeutic injections for medial epicondylitis. 52 (2.8%) required ipsilateral surgery at a mean of 429 ± 28 days post-injection. Risk factors for requiring surgical intervention included age <65, obesity, and morbid obesity. 6,561 patients received therapeutic injections for lateral epicondylitis. 201 (3.1%) required subsequent surgery at a mean of 383 ± 128 days' post-injection. Risk factors included age <65, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease. CONCLUSION: The incidence of surgical intervention following a failed therapeutic injection for medial or lateral epicondylitis is low (~3%). Risk factors for failing a therapeutic injection include age <65 years and obesity (BMI > 30) for medial epicondylitis and age <65 years, smoking, diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease for lateral epicondylitis. Patients with these identified risk factors presenting with medial or lateral epicondylitis should be cautioned that they carry a higher risk of subsequent surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.