RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser and topical tranexamic acid (TA) have shown promise in treating melasma. AIM: This aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining to a picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser combined with topical TA for melasma treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients' facial halves with bilateral symmetrical melasma were randomized to receive either topical TA and picosecond laser treatment or laser monotherapy. All patients received three consecutive picosecond laser treatment sessions at 4-week intervals, and additional one side facial received topical TA treatment twice daily until 4 weeks after the third treatments. Efficacy was assessed using the Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score, VISIA (Canfield, USA) red area feature counts, and average pore volume as measured by Antera 3D®. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed the study. Post-treatment, mMASI scores and VISIA red area feature counts were lower in combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves, and average melanin level was lower in the combination therapy halves (p < 0.05). Comparisons between the combination therapy halves and laser monotherapy halves after the third treatment revealed significant differences in mMASI scores, melanin levels, and VISIA red area feature counts (p < 0.05). After treatment, patient satisfaction rates in the combination therapy halves and monotherapy halves was 71.4% and 54.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). No obvious adverse effects were observed in the combination therapy halves; whereas, 10.42% (5/48) of participants in the laser monotherapy halves experienced temporary pigmentation, which resolved within 3 months. CONCLUSION: The picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser, when used independently and in combination with topical TA, has been proven to be effective in the improvement of melasma. However, the combined treatment approach showed a more pronounced improvement in melasma symptoms, with higher patient satisfaction, and was associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects. These findings strongly support that integrating topical TA with picosecond laser therapy as a superior therapeutic strategy for melasma management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200057771.
Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Melanose , Satisfação do Paciente , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ácido Tranexâmico , Humanos , Melanose/terapia , Melanose/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Tranexâmico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Tranexâmico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Adulto , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Masculino , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Administração Cutânea , Antifibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Antifibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The under-eye region is an area of significant cosmetic concern. Photobiomodulation (PBM) has emerged as an effective, safe, inexpensive, and convenient treatment for skin rejuvenation. Herein, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a LED under-eye device for under-eye rejuvenation, as measured by objective and patient reported outcomes. Eleven participants self-administered treatment using a commercially available LED device emitting red (633 nm) and near infrared (830 nm) light for six weeks. Standardized photographs and questionnaires were administered at baseline and six weeks. Photographic digital analysis indicated an improvement in under-eye wrinkles at six weeks compared to baseline, with a reduction in wrinkle score from 20.05 to 19.72. However, this finding was not statistically significant. Participants self-reported consistent improvements in under-eye wrinkles, texture, dark circles, bags, pigmentation, and erythema. All participants reported a high degree of comfortability, ease of use, and satisfaction with the eye device. The participants noted no moderate or severe adverse events and few reports of transient expected outcomes such as mild erythema. The participants' self-reported improvements and high user satisfaction, and the device's favorable safety profile, highlights the benefits of at-home LED devices for under-eye rejuvenation. Future randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes could further establish the safety and efficacy of at-home LED under-eye treatments.
Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Satisfação do Paciente , Rejuvenescimento , Envelhecimento da Pele , Humanos , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentação , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Inquéritos e Questionários , IdosoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This research was aimed at ascertaining the clinical effects of 595 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) in combination with supramolecular salicylic acid (SSA) in the treatment of rosacea. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with rosacea were selected, of which 42 patients treated with PDL alone were considered as the control group, and 42 patients treated with 595 nm PDL in combination with 30% SSA were regarded as the observation group. The treatment continued for 4 months in the two groups. Clinical symptom scores, skin barrier function indicators, serum inflammatory factors, AcneâQOL scores and adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: After treatment, levels of inflammatory factors, clinical symptom scores, transdermal water loss, and oil volume were decreased, and epidermal water content and Acne-QOL scores were increased in both groups (all P < 0.05), and the changes in the observation group were more pronounced versus the control group (all P < 0.05). The difference in the incidence of adverse reactions was not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: 595 nm PDL in combination with SSA is safe in the treatment of rosacea.
Assuntos
Lasers de Corante , Rosácea , Ácido Salicílico , Humanos , Rosácea/terapia , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Rosácea/tratamento farmacológico , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Corante/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Ácido Salicílico/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem , Pele/patologia , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/efeitos da radiaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), a widely prevalent complication in patients with type 2 diabetes, exerts a significant influence on patients' overall health and financial circumstances. Photobiomodulation therapy is one of the means of physical therapy for DPN. Although preliminary findings suggest the efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy in alleviating peripheral neuropathy, the existing literature lacks substantial evidence regarding its safety and effectiveness specifically in the context of diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy. Therefore, we plan to arrive at more distinct findings through systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. METHODS: We will conduct a comprehensive search for studies published from the beginning until October 1, 2023, using various databases including Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, AMED, Wanfang database, VIP database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature database. Simultaneously, we will also search for the WHO International Clinical Trial Registration Platform, China Clinical Trial Registration Platform, and Clinical Trials.gov. Gray literature will be retrieved using Google Scholar and opengrey.edu. Only randomized controlled trials in Chinese and English were included, with no restrictions on publication status. The primary outcomes will include change of symptom scores, change of nerve conduction velocity. Additional outcomes will encompass quality of life, change in pain, blood glucose levels after fasting and 2 hours after eating, levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, and any adverse events associated with photobiomodulation therapy. Reman V.5.4 and R language will be used for the meta-analysis. Assessment of potential bias will be conducted through Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool (RoB 2.0) and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023466586). DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of photobiomodulation therapy as a potential treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and providing a straightforward and convenient therapeutic for patients. Additionally, it expands the range of treatment alternatives available to healthcare professionals managing DPN.
Assuntos
Neuropatias Diabéticas , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/radioterapia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/radioterapia , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Metanálise como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fractional ablative resurfacing techniques are preferred treatments for facial rejuvenation of aged skin. This study was performed to investigate the cutaneous effects of using a fractional picosecond laser at 1064 nm with a diffractive lens. METHODS: The penetration depth according to the location of the handpiece tip was evaluated using an acrylic panel. Laser induced optical breakdown (LIOB) and cutaneous damage were observed after hematoxylin and eosin staining in guinea pigs. Collagen formation was evaluated using Victoria staining, Masson's trichrome (MT) staining, and immunohistochemical staining for collagen type III. RESULTS: The penetration depth for LEVEL 1 was 499.98-935.23 µm (average: 668.75 ± 182.84 µm); the LIOB cavity area was 1664.17 ± 650.52 µm2. The penetration depth of LEVEL 2 was 257.12-287.38 µm (average: 269.77 ± 14.55 µm) with an LIOB cavity area of 1335.85 ± 214.41 µm2. At LEVEL 3, that was 36.17-53.69 µm (average: 52.15 ± 20.81 µm) and the LIOB cavity area was 1312.67 ± 1069.12 µm2. No epidermal tissue damage was observed and collagen formation was observed from day 14 under all conditions. CONCLUSION: Diffractive optical element (DOE) lens arranged laser treatment system controlled the position of LIOB occurrence and an irradiating area.
Assuntos
Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Animais , Cobaias , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Rejuvenescimento , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos da radiaçãoRESUMO
The prevalence of rosacea in skin of color (SOC) populations is estimated to be as high as 10% in some countries. Traditionally, intense pulsed light (IPL) and pulsed dye laser (PDL) have been the laser and energy-based devices (EBDs) used to treat rosacea. However, not all laser and EBDs are safe for SOC (Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI) due to increased absorption of energy in pigmented skin and increased risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and scarring. This review summarizes the use of the top seven laser and EBDs for treating rosacea in SOC.
Assuntos
Lasers de Corante , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Rosácea , Pigmentação da Pele , Rosácea/terapia , Rosácea/radioterapia , Humanos , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a prevalent form of hair loss that affects both men and women, severely impacting patients' quality of life. Traditional treatments include oral medications, topical medications, and hair transplantation, but these methods have certain side effects and limitations. How to safely effectively and maximally promote hair growth has been a key issue in the treatment of AGA. In recent years, fractionated laser therapy, as a noninvasive method, has gradually gained attention due to its minimally invasive and highly effective nature. AIMS: In this paper, we summarized the studies related to fractional laser treatment of AGA in the past 15 years, and discussed its therapeutic mechanism, clinical effect, future development direction, and advantages and disadvantages compared with traditional treatment methods in the treatment of AGA. METHODS: An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus. All available articles studying fractional laser treatment of AGA were compiled in March 2024. Titles and abstracts were then screened for relevance and thoroughly examined for patient clinical outcomes. Prospective clinical trials, retrospective chart reviews, case series, and individual case reports were included in the literature review. CONCLUSIONS: Fractional laser treatment of AGA showed remarkable efficacy and high safety. Compared with traditional treatments, fractional laser has the advantages of minimally invasive, quick recovery, fewer side effects, and a wide range of population applicability, providing an effective treatment option for AGA patients. Further large-scale clinical studies will help optimize the laser parameters and treatment settings to improve the therapeutic effect.
Assuntos
Alopecia , Humanos , Alopecia/radioterapia , Alopecia/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Cabelo/efeitos da radiação , Cabelo/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
This systematic review assesses the evidence concerning laser treatments for nail psoriasis (NP), a prevalent condition among individuals with cutaneous psoriasis that notably affects their quality of life. Traditional treatments have limitations in terms of drug delivery and poor patient adherence, leading to interest in laser therapies for their targeted approach, extended treatment intervals, and the potential to enhance topical medication effectiveness. The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. English-language randomized and non-randomized controlled trials with full-text availability were included. Data on the laser type, treatment protocol, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) outcomes, and adverse events were extracted, and nail bed and matrix features and patient satisfaction were assessed. The primary effect measure was a percentage reduction in NAPSI scores from baseline. Nineteen studies involving the pulse dye laser (PDL), long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser and fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) were identified. Lasers, particularly those used in conjunction with topical agents, have shown favorable results. PDL effectively lowered NAPSI scores, and the Nd:YAG laser had comparable effectiveness but more discomfort. FCL also shows promise, particularly for topical drug delivery. PDL and Nd:YAG laser treatment were more effective at reducing nail bed features, whereas FCL was effective at reducing both nail bed and matrix features. Overall, lasers are promising treatment alternatives for NP, with similar NAPSI outcomes to topical therapies and intralesional injections.
Assuntos
Lasers de Corante , Lasers de Gás , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Doenças da Unha , Psoríase , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Psoríase/terapia , Psoríase/radioterapia , Doenças da Unha/terapia , Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Terapia a Laser/instrumentação , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Pigmentação da Pele , Humanos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Estudos Transversais , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Pigmentação da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Raios Infravermelhos/uso terapêutico , Percepção , Masculino , Feminino , AdultoRESUMO
Laser hair removal is a commonly used method in dermatology which is based on selective thermolysis and utilizes the appropriate wavelength, pulse width, and energy density to damage hair follicles. Given the prevalence of skin diseases such as psoriasis, dermatitis, and vitiligo, and the increasing popularity of laser hair removal, the aim of this study was to investigate the safety of laser hair removal in individuals with skin diseases. This retrospective study was conducted at the laser department of Razi Hospital on 99 patients who underwent laser hair removal. The exacerbation of disease after laser therapy was significantly associated with active skin disease (p = .021) and laser treatment at the site of the disease (p < .001). The incidence of Koebner phenomenon was significantly associated with age (p = .017) and the number of sessions with the ND-YAG device (p = .034). It is crucial to exercise caution when performing laser treatment on individuals with active skin disease and to avoid treating the affected area were possible. If necessary, it is recommended to delay laser treatment until the disease is under control for patients with active skin disease or those who wish to receive laser treatment at the site of the disease.
Assuntos
Remoção de Cabelo , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Remoção de Cabelo/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Cabelo/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/radioterapia , Dermatopatias/etiologia , Adulto Jovem , Psoríase/radioterapia , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Vitiligo/radioterapia , Adolescente , IdosoRESUMO
Contemporary approaches for facial rejuvenation encompass the utilization of both ablative and nonablative laser techniques. Extensive research has elucidated the adverse consequences associated with ablative laser treatment, such as the emergence of infectious, follicular, scarring, and pigmentary alterations. Nonablative fractional lasers exhibit commendable cosmetic outcomes, characterized by a diminished incidence of complications owing to their photomechanical mechanisms, in contrast to ablative laser modalities. Nonetheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that untoward effects may still manifest. In this report, we present two cases of herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation subsequent to nonablative fractional resurfacing. Timely identification and the appropriate administration of antiviral agents are important, which serve as imperative measures to mitigate the long-term consequences that may arise in the event of complications.
Assuntos
Envelhecimento da Pele , Humanos , Feminino , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Herpes Simples/etiologia , Ativação Viral/efeitos da radiação , Simplexvirus , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Rejuvenescimento , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentação , Face , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Terapia a Laser/métodosRESUMO
Previous clinical studies have shown that pulsed dye laser (PDL) and intense pulsed light (IPL) are effective for treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea(ETR). This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PDL and IPL at three different wavelength bands (broad-band, single-narrow-band, and dual-narrow-band) in treating ETR. Sixty subjects with ETR were randomly categorized into four groups and received one of the following laser treatments: PDL (595 nm), IPL with Delicate Pulse Light (DPL, 500-600 nm), IPL with M22 590 (590-1200 nm), or IPL with M22 vascular filter (530-650 nm and 900-1200 nm). Four treatment sessions were administered at 4-week intervals, with one follow-up session 4 weeks after the final treatment. The efficacy of the four lasers was evaluated by comparing the clinical symptom score, total effective rate, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score before and after treatment. The safety was evaluated by comparing adverse reactions such as pain, purpura, erythematous edema, and blister. All 60 subjects completed the study. Within-group effects showed that the clinical symptom score, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score of all four groups were significantly reduced compared to before treatment (p < 0.001). Between-group effects showed no statistically significant difference among the four laser groups. Safety analysis showed that all four lasers were safe, but the incidence of blister was higher in the M22 vascular group. Nonpurpurogenic PDL, DPL, M22 590, and M22 vascular were equally effective in treating ETR and were well-tolerated. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT05360251.
Assuntos
Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa , Lasers de Corante , Rosácea , Humanos , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Corante/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Rosácea/radioterapia , Rosácea/terapia , Adulto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa/métodos , Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa/instrumentação , Terapia de Luz Pulsada Intensa/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date, a consensus on the relative efficacy and safety of CO2 fractional laser versus erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) fractional laser treatments for atrophic acne scars has not been reached. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess and compare their effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. METHODS: For this meta-analysis, we conducted comprehensive searches in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, covering publications from their inception up to August 2023. Our focus was on studies comparing fractional CO2 laser with Er:YAG fractional laser treatments for atrophic acne scars. We excluded duplicate publications, research lacking full-text access, incomplete data, or cases where data extraction was not feasible. Additionally, animal experiments, reviews, and systematic reviews were not considered. Data analysis was performed using STATA 15.1. RESULTS: Eight studies (seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a retrospective study) were included in this meta-analysis. The sample size ranged from 28 to 106 with a total of 418 patients, including 210 in the CO2 fractional group and 208 in Er:YAG fractional group. The pooled results showed that the effective rate of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly higher than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.08-3.01) and the downtime of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly shorter than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = -2.11, 95% CI: -3.11 to -1.10). In addition, VAS of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly higher than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (WMD = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.32-2.21) and the duration of erythema of CO2 fractional laser in treating atrophic acne scar was significantly longer than that of Er:YAG fractional laser (WMD = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.63-2.07). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of pain and incidence of PIHbetween CO2 fractional laser and of Er:YAG fractional laser. CONCLUSION: When it comes to treating atrophic acne scars, CO2 fractional laser demonstrates superior efficacy and leads to shorter downtime. However, it is important to note that CO2 fractional laser treatments tend to result in higher pain intensity and may carry a higher risk of post-treatment pigmentation compared to Er:YAG fractional laser procedures.
Assuntos
Acne Vulgar , Cicatriz , Lasers de Gás , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Humanos , Acne Vulgar/complicações , Acne Vulgar/radioterapia , Atrofia/etiologia , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/terapia , Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Gás/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Skin aging and photoaging is a process that may appear at a relatively early age, causing an aesthetic problem. Common signs of skin aging include wrinkles, dyspigmentation, and decreased elasticity. AIM: Aim of this article is to study the effectiveness and safety of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for skin rejuvenation. METHODS: Thirty Syrian female patients aged 25-50 participated in this study and were diagnosed with moderate to severe melasma and wrinkles. The patients were divided into two groups and received LLLT with a wavelength of 660 nm emitting a continuous wave. The power density and dose used were 15.6 mW/cm2, and 3 J/cm2 respectively, and the laser effective area was 32 cm2. The evaluation was done before, during, and after 12 treatment sessions, based on photographs, in addition to the modified Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI), Pinch test, and Fitzpatrick's classification of facial wrinkling at baseline. RESULTS: Comparing before, and after treatment, and between the two groups, revealed a significant improvement in skin rejuvenation, with a statistical significance (p < 0.05). Additional outcome measures included assessments of patient satisfaction scores, and no adverse effects or re-pigmentation were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that LLLT may be a useful and safe therapeutic option in treating melasma, skin elasticity, and wrinkle improvement, which we advised to be integrated into treatment, and follow-up programs in cosmetics and dermatology.
Assuntos
Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Melanose , Satisfação do Paciente , Rejuvenescimento , Envelhecimento da Pele , Humanos , Feminino , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Adulto , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Melanose/radioterapia , Melanose/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentação , FaceRESUMO
Laser sources have established their potential effect in inducing hair regrowth. No large cohort study has evaluated the effect of ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium yttrium aluminum garnet (Er: YAG) laser in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). To investigate the efficacy and safety of the ablative fractional 2940-nm Er: YAG laser in combination with medication therapy for the treatment of AGA. We performed a retrospective study between first July 2021 to 30th December 2021. All included patients received oral finasteride and topical minoxidil, or combined with six sessions of Er: YAG laser at 2-week intervals. Patients were divided into medication or combined therapy groups. The efficacy of the two therapies was evaluated by the investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores and the patient's Likert satisfaction scale at week 12 and week 24. Changes in total, terminal and villous hair count, total and terminal hair diameter, and AGA grade were also recorded. Adverse events were evaluated at each follow-up. A total of 192 male patients with AGA were included, including 67 receiving combination treatment, and 125 receiving medication treatment. At week 24, the combination treatment afforded superior outcomes in the IGA score, patient's global assessment, total and terminal hair counts, and diameters (all P<0.05). No severe adverse events were reported in both groups. The combined therapy of ablative fractional Er: YAG laser and medication was superior in treating male AGA than single medication therapy without serious adverse effects.
Assuntos
Alopecia , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Humanos , Alopecia/terapia , Alopecia/radioterapia , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Finasterida/administração & dosagem , Finasterida/uso terapêutico , Minoxidil/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pulsed-dye lasers (PDL) are one of the standard therapies for rosacea, but alternatives are needed. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of the variable-sequenced, large-spot 532 nm KTP laser to the 595 nm PDL in treating rosacea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, controlled, evaluator-blinded study. Patients were treated with either a KTP or PDL with 1-3 sessions at intervals of 6-8 weeks. A follow-up visit was scheduled on Week 6 post-treatment. Clinical outcome was assessed by computer-assisted analysis and by patients and two blinded dermatologists. Pain intensity during treatment and adverse events were documented. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (mean age 51 years) were allocated in a 2:1 ratio to either the KTP or PDL. Erythema in both treatment arms decreased significantly (p < 0.01). Clinical evaluation revealed high improvement. Mean pain intensity was significantly lower with the KTP (2.5/10) than with the PDL (4.1/10). Both lasers showed a good safety profile. Relevant purpura was only seen in the PDL group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the variable-sequenced, large-spot KTP and the PDL demonstrated comparable efficacy in treatment of rosacea. Regarding safety, the KTP exhibited fewer post-treatment reactions. The KTP might serve as a potential alternative to PDL in the treatment of rosacea.
Assuntos
Lasers de Corante , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Rosácea , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Eritema/etiologia , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Corante/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Púrpura/etiologia , Rosácea/terapia , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Vitiligo is a common depigmenting skin disorder. This work is performed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of fire needles combined with 308 nm excimer laser therapy in treating vitiligo. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fire needles combined with 308 nm excimer laser therapy with 308 nm excimer laser therapy alone for vitiligo were included. The Cochrane Collaborative Network Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Statistical analysis was completed using RevMan5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcomes. RESULTS: In this study, 10 RCTs and 1333 patients were included. The results showed that compared with 308 nm excimer laser therapy alone, fire needle combined with 308 nm excimer laser therapy is more effective in improving clinical effective rate (RR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.24, 1.50], p < 0.00001), serum CD4+ level (MD = 3.12, 95% CI [2.50, 3.74], p < 0.00001), CD4+/CD8+ ratio (MD = 0.24, 95% CI [0.09, 0.39], p = 0.001), and quality of life measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (MD = 3.76, 95% CI [3.33, 4.19], p < 0.00001), and reducing the Vitiligo Area Score Index (VASI) (MD = -5.47, 95% CI [-6.56, -4.37], p < 0.00001). The reported adverse events, including redness, swelling, pain, blisters, and itching, were controllable, and all these events were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The current evidence indicates that fire needle combined with 308 nm excimer laser therapy is effective and safe for vitiligo. However, owing to the suboptimal quality of the included studies, more high-quality and large-scale RCTs are needed for comprehensive analysis and further validation.
Assuntos
Lasers de Excimer , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vitiligo , Vitiligo/radioterapia , Humanos , Lasers de Excimer/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Excimer/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Agulhas , Terapia por Acupuntura/instrumentação , Terapia por Acupuntura/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodosRESUMO
Importance: Early treatment of port-wine birthmark (PWB) can be life-altering and is often associated with improved outcomes and quality of life. There is growing evidence that shorter treatment intervals may play a role in more rapid PWB clearance; however, the optimal treatment interval has not been established. Objective: To describe the outcomes of once-weekly pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatments for PWB in infants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series analyzed the medical records of patients with PWB who received once-weekly PDL treatments between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023, at the Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York. These patients were younger than 6 months. Before-and-after treatment photographs were independently assessed and graded 2 months after initiation of treatment. Intervention: Once-weekly PDL treatments. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage improvement of PWB, which was graded using the following scale: 0% (no improvement), 1% to 25% (mild improvement), 26% to 50% (moderate improvement), 51% to 75% (marked improvement), 76% to 95% (near-total clearance), and 96% to 100% (total clearance). Results: Of the 10 patients (6 males [60%]; median [range] age at first treatment, 4 [<1 to 20] weeks) included, 7 (70%) had experienced either near-total clearance (76%-95%) or total clearance (96%-100%) of their PWB with once-weekly PDL treatments after 2 months. The other 3 patients all saw marked improvement (51%-75%) and subsequently went on to achieve near-total clearance with additional treatments. The median (range) duration of treatment and number of treatments to achieve near-total or total clearance in all patients were 2 (0.2-5.1) months and 8 (2-20) treatments, respectively. No adverse events were noted. Conclusion and Relevance: This case series found that once-weekly PDL treatments for PWB in the first few months of life was associated with near-total or total clearance of PWB with no reported adverse events, suggesting improved outcomes can be achieved with shorter overall treatment duration. Further investigation into this novel decreased treatment interval of 1 week is warranted.
Assuntos
Lasers de Corante , Mancha Vinho do Porto , Humanos , Mancha Vinho do Porto/radioterapia , Mancha Vinho do Porto/cirurgia , Lasers de Corante/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Corante/efeitos adversos , Lactente , Masculino , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recém-Nascido , Fatores de Tempo , Qualidade de Vida , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) exhibits robust absorption near 800 nm. AIMS: To examine the clinical effects of combining ICG with a 785 nm picosecond laser for treating photo-aged skin. PATIENT/METHODS: A 785 nm 600 picosecond laser was used on the facial area of 16 female patients with Fitzpatrick skin type III and IV (mean age: 58.44 ± 5.24 years) after applying 0.0125% ICG cream. A total of 3000 shots were administered in diffractive optical element mode at a pulse energy of 200 mJ and frequency of 10 Hz. Hyperpigmented lesions were treated using the Zoom handpiece set at a spot size of 3-4 mm, pulse energy of 60-120 mJ, and frequency of 3-7 Hz. Patients underwent five sessions of treatment at intervals of 1-2 weeks. Wrinkles, pores and pigmented lesions were assessed at the initial assessment and 4 weeks after the final treatment using the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale and 10-point visual analog scale, respectively. Skin biopsy of the postauricular area was performed on two consenting patients. RESULTS: Significant improvements in wrinkles (p = 0.02), pores (p = 0.034), and hyperpigmentation (p = 0.036) were observed, along with increased patient subjective improvement. Adverse effects were transient and well-tolerated. Hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining revealed increased and thickened dermal collagen fibers. Immunohistochemical staining revealed increased expression of collagen I and III throughout the papillary and upper reticular dermis, along with diffuse increase of STRO-1 in the dermis. CONCLUSIONS: The combined application of a 785 nm picosecond laser and ICG yielded promising clinical outcomes for treating photo-aged skin in Asian patients with Fitzpatrick skin type III and IV.
Assuntos
Povo Asiático , Verde de Indocianina , Rejuvenescimento , Envelhecimento da Pele , Humanos , Feminino , Verde de Indocianina/administração & dosagem , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos da radiação , Envelhecimento da Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hiperpigmentação/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/efeitos adversos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/métodos , Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade/instrumentação , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Pele/patologia , Pele/diagnóstico por imagem , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Face , Corantes/administração & dosagem , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/instrumentação , Idoso , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Administração Cutânea , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Concentrated growth factor (CGF) injection has proven effective in treating androgenetic alopecia (AGA). The primary mechanism of CGF in treating AGA is thought to be the CD34+ stem cells and platelets-associated growth factors being injected into the scalp. CGF efficacy in treating AGA may rely on the activation level of these stem cells and platelets. The 640 nm laser is a United States Food and Drug Administration approved AGA treatment that activates follicle stem cells. Therefore, we hypothesize that pretreating CGF with a 640 nm laser may further activate CD34+ stem cells and platelets, thereby improving the efficacy of CGF in treating AGA. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate whether 640 nm laser pretreated CGF (640CGF) has a greater effect in treating AGA than 640 nm laser non-pretreated CGF (N640CGF) and evaluate whether 640 nm laser pretreatment changed CD34+ cell percentage. METHODS: This study enrolled 10 patients (8 male, 2 female) with AGA aged 18-60 years who received CGF injections. The 640CGF group was pretreated with a 640 nm laser at an energy density of 4 J/cm2, with a 30 cm irradiation distance for 30 min. Half of the scalp was treated with 640CGF, whereas the other half was treated with N640CGF. The injection was prepared by a doctor who did not know which blood tube had been pretreated. The treatment efficacy was evaluated using a trichoscope 1 month after injection. RESULTS: All 10 (100%) patients participated in the follow-up visit, and a higher quantity of new hairs was observed on the side injected with 640CGF than N640CGF (p = 0.019). Additionally, fewer malnourished hairs were observed on the 640CGF pretreated side (p = 0.015). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A higher percentage of CD34+ stem cells and improved efficacy in AGA treatment could be observed with CGF prepared from 640 nm laser-pretreated blood.