Investigation of the inhibitory effects of various drugs on the hepatic uptake of fexofenadine in humans.

Fexofenadine (FEX), an H(1)-receptor antagonist, is eliminated from the liver mainly in an unchanged form. Our previous study suggested that organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B3 contributes mainly to the hepatic uptake of FEX. On the other hand, a clinical report demonstrated that a T521C mutation of OATP1B1 increased its plasma area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Several compounds are reported to have a drug interaction with FEX, and some of this may be caused by the inhibition of its hepatic uptake. We determined which transporters are involved in the hepatobiliary transport of FEX by using double transfectants and examined whether clinically reported drug interactions with FEX could be explained by the inhibition of its hepatic uptake. Vectorial basal-to-apical transport of FEX was observed in double transfectants expressing OATP1B1/multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) and OATP1B3/MRP2, suggesting that OATP1B1 as well as OATP1B3 is involved in the hepatic uptake of FEX and that MRP2 can recognize FEX as a substrate. The inhibitory effects of compounds on FEX uptake in OATP1B3-expressing HEK293 cells were investigated, and the maximal degree of increase in plasma AUC of FEX by drug interaction in clinical situations was estimated. As a result, cyclosporin A and rifampicin were found to have the potential to interact with OATP1B3-mediated uptake at clinical concentrations. From these results, most of the reported drug interaction cannot be explained by the inhibition of hepatic uptake of FEX, and different mechanisms such as the inhibition of intestinal efflux should be considered.

Potent pruritogenic action of tryptase mediated by PAR-2 receptor and its involvement in anti-pruritic effect of nafamostat mesilate in mice.

The pruritogenic potency of tryptase and its involvement in anti-pruritic effect of intravenous nafamostat mesilate (NFM) were studied in mice. An intradermal injection of tryptase (0.05-1 ng/site) elicited scratching in ICR mice, while chymase was without effects at doses of 0.05-50 ng/site. The dose-response curve of tryptase action was bell-shaped and the effect peaked at 0.1 ng/site (approximately 0.7 fmol/site). NFM (10 mg/kg) inhibited scratching induced by tryptase but not by histamine and serotonin. NFM (1-10 mg/kg) produced the dose-dependent inhibition of scratching induced by intradermal compound 48/80 (10 microg/site). The inhibition by NFM (10 mg/kg) was abolished in mast cell-deficient (WBB6F1 W/W(V)) mice, but not in wild-type (WBB6F1 +/+) mice. NFM (10 mg/kg) suppressed tryptase activity in the mouse skin. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) neutralizing antibody (0.1 and 1 microg/site) and the PAR-2 antagonist FSLLRY (10 and 100 microg/site) inhibited scratching induced by tryptase (0.1 ng/site) and compound 48/80 (10 microg/site). These results suggest that mast cell tryptase elicits itch through PAR-2 receptor and that NFM inhibits itch-associated responses mainly through the inhibition of mast cell tryptase.

Applications of primary human hepatocytes in the evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions: evaluation of model drugs terfenadine and rifampin.

The utility of primary human hepatocytes in the evaluation of drug-drug interactions is being investigated in our laboratories. Our initial approach was to investigate whether drug-drug interactions observed in humans in vivo could be reproduced in vitro using human hepatocytes. Two model drugs were studied: terfenadine and rifampin, representing compounds subjected to drug-drug interactions via inhibitory and induction mechanisms, respectively. Terfenadine was found to be metabolized by human hepatocytes to C-oxidation and N-dealkylation products as observed in humans in vivo. Metabolism by human hepatocytes was found to be inhibited by drugs which are known to be inhibitory in vivo. Ki values for the various inhibitors were derived from the in vitro metabolism data, resulting in the following ranking of inhibitory potency: For the inhibition of C-oxidation, ketoconazole > itraconazole > cyclosporin approximately troleandomycin > erythromycin > naringenin. For the inhibition of N-dealkylation, itraconazole > or = ketoconazole > cyclosporin > or = naringenin > or = erythromycin > or = troleandomycin. Rifampin induction of CYP3A, a known effect of rifampin in vivo, was also reproduced in primary human hepatocytes. Induction of CYP3A4, measured as testosterone 6 beta-hydroxylation, was found to be dose-dependent, treatment duration-dependent, and reversible. The induction effect of rifampin was observed in hepatocytes isolated from all 7 human donors studied, with ages ranging from 1.7 to 78 years. To demonstrate that the rifampin-induction of testosterone 6 beta-hydroxylation could be generalized to other CYP3A4 substrates, we evaluated the metabolism of another known substrate of CYP3A4, lidocaine. Dose-dependent induction of lidocaine metabolism by rifampin is observed. Our results suggest that primary human hepatocytes may be a useful experimental system for preclinical evaluation of drug-drug interaction potential during drug development, and as a tool to evaluate the mechanism of clinically observed drug-drug interactions.

The cardiac effects of terfenadine after inhibition of its metabolism by grapefruit juice.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of terfenadine are affected by the concomitant administration of grapefruit juice. METHODS: Six healthy volunteers were recruited for a balanced cross-over study. Each volunteer received 120 mg terfenadine 30 min after drinking 300 ml of either water or freshly squeezed grapefruit juice. The alternative treatment was administered on the second study day 2 weeks later. Measurements of the area under the terfenadine plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum terfenadine concentration (Cmax) and the time to maximum concentration (tmax) were made, and the corrected QT (QTc) interval was measured from the surface electrocardiogram. RESULTS: Terfenadine was quantifiable in plasma in all 6 subjects on both study days for up to 24 h post-dosing. The AUC of terfenadine was significantly increased by concomitant grapefruit administration (median values 40.6 vs 16.3 ng.ml-1.h), as was the Cmax (median values 7.2 vs 2.1 ng.ml-1). The tmax was not significantly increased and there was no significant change in the median QTc interval despite the increased terfenadine levels. The 95% confidence interval for the difference in the change in QTc interval at Cmax was -13 to +38 ms. CONCLUSION: Administration of grapefruit juice concomitantly with terfenadine may lead to an increase in terfenadine bioavailability, but the increase observed in this study did not lead to significant cardiotoxicity in normal subjects. However, this does not exclude the risk of cardiotoxicity in high-risk subjects given greater doses of grapefruit juice over longer periods of time.

Effect of concomitant administration of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effects of terfenadine.

Terfenadine is a widely prescribed non-sedating antihistamine which undergoes rapid and almost complete first pass biotransformation to an active carboxylic acid metabolite. It is unusual to find unmetabolised terfenadine in the plasma of patients taking the drug. Terfenadine in vitro is a potent blocker of the myocardial potassium channel. Overdose, hepatic compromise and the coadministration of ketoconazole and erythromycin result in the accumulation of terfenadine, which is thought to be responsible of QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes ventricular arrhythmia in susceptible individuals. Cimetidine and ranitidine are two popular H2 antagonists which are often taken with terfenadine. The effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on terfenadine metabolism were studied in two cohorts of 6 normal volunteers given the recommended dose of terfenadine (60 mg every 12 h) for 1 week prior to initiation of cimetidine 600 mg every 12 h or ranitidine 150 mg every 12 h. Pharmacokinetic profiles and morning pre-dose electrocardiograms were obtained whilst the patients were on terfenadine alone and after the addition of cimetidine or rantidine. One of the subjects in each cohort had a detectable plasma level of parent compound after 1 week of terfenadine therapy alone; it did not accumulate further after addition of the H2 antagonist. The pharmacokinetics of the carboxylic acid metabolite of terfenadine (Cmax, tmax, AUC) were not significantly changed after co-administration of either H2 antagonist. None of the remaining 5 subjects in either cohort demonstrated accumulation of unmetabolised terfenadine after addition of the respective H2 antagonist and electrocardiographic QT intervals and T-U morphology in them was not changed during the course of the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)