Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking with In Silico Physicochemical, Pharmacokinetic and Toxicity Prediction of Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines.

Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines 5a-c, 9a-c and 13a-i were synthesized for evaluation of their in vitro antimicrobial properties against some microorganisms and their immunomodulatory activity. The biological activities of pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines showed that the pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines (5c, 9a, 9c, 13a, 13c, 13d, 13e and 13h) displayed promising antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities. Studying the in silico predicted physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, ADMET and drug-likeness properties for the pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines 5a-c, 9a-c and 13a-i confirmed that most of the compounds (i) were within the range set by Lipinski's rule of five, (ii) show higher gastrointestinal absorption and inhibition of some CYP isoforms, and (iii) have a carcinogenicity test that was predicted as negative and hERG test that presented medium risk. Moreover, the molecular docking study demonstrated that the compounds 5c, 9a, 9c, 13a, 13c, 13d, 13e and 13h are potent inhibitors of 14-alpha demethylase, transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase enzymes. This study could be valuable in the discovery of a new series of drugs.

Differentiation-Defective Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Reveal Strengths and Limitations of the Teratoma Assay and In Vitro Pluripotency Assays.

The ability to form teratomas in vivo containing multiple somatic cell types is regarded as functional evidence of pluripotency for human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). Since the Teratoma assay is animal dependent, laborious, and only qualitative, the PluriTest and the hPSC ScoreCard assay have been developed as in vitro alternatives. Here we compared normal hPSCs, induced hPSCs (hiPSCs) with reactivated reprogramming transgenes, and human embryonal carcinoma cells (hECs) in these assays. While normal hPSCs gave rise to typical teratomas, the xenografts of the hECs and the hiPSCs with reactivated reprogramming transgenes were largely undifferentiated and malignant. The hPSC ScoreCard assay confirmed the line-specific differentiation propensities in vitro. However, when undifferentiated cells were analyzed by the PluriTest, only hECs were identified as abnormal whereas all other cell lines were indistinguishable and resembled normal hPSCs. Our results indicate that pluripotency assays are best selected on the basis of intended downstream applications.

Bone marrow spontaneous lesions in rodents from nonclinical 104-week carcinogenicity studies.

The authors performed a retrospective study to determine the incidences and range of spontaneous lesions in the bone marrow (sternum and femur) of control mice and rats. Data was collected from 2186 mice (Crl:CD-1(ICR)BR), and 2347 rats (Han Wistar and CD(SD) rats) from the control dose groups of 104-week carcinogenicity studies carried out between 2005 and 2014. The incidence of spontaneous lesions in the bone marrow was higher in mice than in rats, and in both species non-neoplastic lesions were more common than neoplastic lesions. In mice, the most common non-neoplastic lesions in the bone marrow were increased cellularity, pigmented macrophages, and decreased cellularity, and the most common neoplastic lesions were malignant lymphoma, granulocytic leukemia and histiocytic sarcoma. There were occasional sex and site differences (sternum marrow vs femur marrow) in the incidence of a few bone marrow lesions in mice. In rats, the most common non-neoplastic lesions were increased cellularity and stromal fibrosis, and the most common neoplastic lesion was malignant lymphoma. In rats, no sex predilection in the incidence of bone marrow lesions was apparent, and there were no significant site differences in the incidence of lesions. To the best knowledge of the authors, there are no recent reports on spontaneous pathological findings in bone marrow of rodents, and we believe that these results will facilitate the interpretation of background findings and/or their increased incidence in carcinogenicity studies.

Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay: in silico methods, and the in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity assays.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Carcinogenicity and mutagenicity are toxicological end points posing considerable concern for human health. Due to the cost in animal lives, time and money, alternative approaches to the rodent bioassay were designed based on: i) identification of mutations and ii) structure-activity relationships. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: Evidence on i) and ii) is summarized, covering 4 decades (1971 - 2010). WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: A comprehensive, state-of-the-art perspective on alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Research to develop mutagenicity-based tests to predict carcinogenicity has generated useful results only for a limited area of the chemical space, that is, for the DNA-reactive chemicals (able to induce cancer, together with a wide spectrum of mutations). The most predictive mutagenicity-based assay is the Ames test. For non-DNA-reactive chemicals, that are Ames-negative and mutagenic in other in vitro assays (e.g., clastogenicity), no correlation with carcinogenicity is apparent. The knowledge on DNA reactivity permits the identification of genotoxic carcinogens with the same efficiency of the Ames test. Thus, a chemical mutagenic in Salmonella and/or with structural alerts should be seriously considered as a potential carcinogen. No reliable mutagenicity-based alternative tools are available to assess the risk of non-DNA-reactive chemicals.

Are lifespan rodent carcinogenicity studies defensible for pharmaceutical agents?

For most pharmaceuticals, the assessment of carcinogenic risk to humans can be made from information available from a) genotoxicity studies in vivo, b) 3-6 month toxicology studies in two or more animal species and c) clinical investigations in Phase I and II studies aimed at assessing the existence of risk factors (genotoxicity, immune suppression, hormonal activity and chronic irritation/inflammation) associated with cancer in humans caused by pharmaceuticals. The rodent carcinogenicity bioassay is redundant for compounds with such properties. In considering the utility of a bioassay, one must recognize that the outcome of the bioassay has been shown to be predictable for about half of a random selection of chemicals in the US National Toxicology Program (NTP). The predictability of bioassay outcomes for many pharmaceuticals should be even better, given the availability of extensive knowledge on genotoxic potential in vivo and of pharmacological mechanisms, this adding to the redundancy of the bioassay. Furthermore, the value of the bioassay is itself questionable. The inconsistencies in tumor responses between rodent species and strains, the simultaneous tumor increase and decreases within a study and the susceptibility to tumorigenicity from non-genotoxic chemicals by mechanisms now shown to be of no relevance to humans, together make the use of rodents highly misleading as predictors of human cancer risk. For pharmaceuticals with a novel or poorly-understood pharmacodynamic mechanism, useful information on long-term adverse effects that might presage a carcinogenic hazard to humans may be obtained from a 12 month study, usually in rats, conducted at clinically relevant dose levels.